A woman president? More like, no fucking way.
I hate to be political as much as the next man — which means exactly that I love it more than I love breathing air or using my eyeballs for seeing.
Think about that for a second because you know that it’s true. We men love politics, it’s no secret. It’s as much a part of being man as getting animals drunk or being forever vigilant for the greatest and fastest shortcut of all time. Politics at its core is in fact the very core of man. It is a quest, but a quest for what? Bam. That’s what. How do you like that.
Before I continue let me stress that no woman under any circumstance should be venturing these very deepest waters of sophomoric thought as revelations of the type just witnessed (with many more to come) can be severely damaging.
Let us picture in our minds a mythical land that would embody only the manliest nature — and here of course I’m talking about Germany, you can see for yourself. Picnic benches of oak as thick as a cinder block as far as the eye can see, and beer in glass steins the weight of an airplane windshield being getting smashed together with abandon for the absolute fuck of it.
Do you think that in the metaphorical “topic hat” of such a place there exists perhaps a piece of paper that says, “How was your day?” or “Where my mother went wrong.”
Fuck no. No way. And in fact there exists no such topic hat in either reality or fantasy.
But why?
It because men in such a place of rampant manhood want to speak of only one thing: Politik. The politics of doing the job. The politics about doing the job. And the politics of getting the job done. You can no sooner squelch this desire than you can throw a dumpster into the middle of the street with your bare hands. It cannot be done.
I think that my point here is obvious: a woman will never ever in a million fucking years be president of the United States or of anywhere.
There are two simple reasons for this. There is no need for a third because the first two are so utterly conclusive. Observe as I blow the lid off the entire media hype and tornado of bullshit…
No woman will ever be president because:
1. No woman is a man.
2. See rule 1.
Done. The fact that men are better than women is merely a corollary at this point.
Let’s expand these principles to some degree of practice with the power of our mighty imaginations by temporarily suspending every single non-perversion of logic and placing a woman in the White House for just a moment. The stress on the mind from such an absurdity is taxing I know so this will be brief. It is some relief that the details of the scene are not important. It can be any scene — that’s the beauty of it; any scene in which Madam President is there with anyone else.
What she is thinking at any moment is precisely, ‘Am I doing a good job?’, ‘Does everyone think I’m a fraud?’, ‘Did I get everyone’s opinion?’
Utter bullshit.
As men we know inherently that this is absolutely no way to get the job done. This kind of lay-about, lolly-gagging thought isn’t even preparing to get the job done. It’s a lame fuck around, and a waste of time.
Women do not understand politics at its core as much as a dog or a screwdriver does not understand crossing a busy street. Sure, you can guide them safely across. You can carry a screw driver to the store and buy it a cookie, but in the end it has no goddamn idea what’s going on — and that’s really what we’re talking about here.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 24 23 22 21 [20] 19 18 17 16 15 14 … 1 » Show All
..how far did u go to get that comment? i cant see it anywhere?
OK, alen. u can belive i know stuff or ot, i really dont mind. ur choice, and no, im not an expert yet, (will be tho!;P) im still pretty young, and i know more on that stuff then the average adult, so, eh. Im doing well.
but seen as u say u know more then me on it,wat do u mean “That applies to sex and conflict. That’s not aggression. That’s not necessarily competition. Both of those things can exist without engaging in risk.”
Sex in one long battle= conflict
conflict requires aggression
aggression is surfaced when needed to enhance chances of success because conflict means a competition has arisen
so im lost..i dont get it. can u explain it to me?
and why do u talk up testosterone when explain aggressive nature, coz adrenalin is pretty high up there.
i figured stuff like Dopamine and norepinephrine would be going crazy.
i figured theyd play a bigger role then testosterone..but im probably wrong…can you explain it better then?
Yeah, imagine if she goes up to the Muslims and yell “I demand rights for your women!”.
Boom. WWIII.
Pure poetry.
Gosh you’re a whore all the time. Seriously though, shut your attention whoring mouth, preferably with your favorite cake/ice cream/cock, run a lap, and get the fuck out of here.
Is it true that you can tell how old a fat woman is by counting the stretch marks?
If it is, rest assured that the all-you-can-eat Chinese buffet that is Clair’s life, is about to run out of wontons.
So how exactly is she so qualified? Most of her supporters that I’ve heard have simply been “YAY! A woman like me! Girl Power!” while political correspondents spend their time discussing her wardrobe and choice of accessories. This is the top job in your entire nation, Commander in Chief of the armed forces, and representative of the US to the rest of the world. Much of which, if you hadn’t noticed, really isn’t too happy with the US at present. Particularly, and most importantly, in certain nations where its a woman’s place to shut the fuck up. So if you think she’s going to fix the current fiasco I think you’re very mistaken. The last thing the US needs at the moment is a sign of weakness in their eyes. Do her policies hold water? I can’t comment too deeply on those as I find trouble finding anything about her campaign that doesn’t involve the fact she’s A) a woman, and B) not a Republican. From what little I have read, it seems she proposes some very radical socialist changes to the economy. You spent a very long era of cold war convincing the rest of the world a free market economy was the ideal environment. Is the US really changing its views on that? They also come with a high price, you know, just look at the Australian tax system and see what sort of price if done properly. If they’re not done properly, then its money tossed into a cesspit after being shredded.
Lots of fuzzy feel good ideas may work around a coffee table over tea and cupcakes, they may seem very exciting prospects, but like the man who comes home at dinner time says, “Who is going to pay for it?”
I have no say in the matter, and confess not knowing the whole story behind her campaign platform. But I look on with interest to see how things turn out in the nation I respect as staunch dependable allies. The outcome affects us also, for there won’t be many others standing firm beside you in the global arena unless they have their hand out asking for free shit.
Frankly, this Aussie is nervous about the whole thing.
At least I dont lie about it.
Heh
just like you won’t vote for her because she lacks a Y chromosome
Yeah. We are talking about the nation’s top job here. There is no way in hell we cannot find at least a 100 men more capable than Hilary to take on the job. But then again, women will vote for her because she has XX chromosome. Heh.
So she simply won’t be president because she is a woman
You haven’t bothered to hear he points or veiws?
I personally like Obama, he has the same standpoints as I do, but as does Hilary
The role of testosterone has been grossly misrepresented; and that’s only beginning to change. There’s been a lot of bias on the subject.
Here are some factoids to help
- Testosterone exists in both men and women; but is higher in men.
- Testosterone is responsible for sex drive in men and women
- Testosterone levels fluctuate over the day, and rise in cases of competition/challenge and sex
- In cases of competition, testosterone levels will remain high for some time after the event for the winner; but will plummet for the loser
- Men with high testosterone levels are generally happier, and are in much better health, mentally and physically; but tend to engage in riskier behaviour
- Men with low testosterone levels are moodier, have low sex drives and poorer health
In summary… what testosterone appears to be doing, is giving the body a reward system for taking risks, and helping to engage in persuing that risk. That applies to sex and conflict. That’s not aggression. That’s not necessarily competition. Both of those things can exist without engaging in risk. But testosterone does help the body and mind in dealing with the conflict. It’s also interesting that testosterone drops for losers in conflict. As though the body cuts off the reward system so that the person doesn’t engage in that risky behavior.
What I tell women is that if they want to understand how testosterone affect men’s behavior; just think of how they feel when they’re really really horny and just want to jump a guy. That’s testosterone, and that’s the kind of focus and grit that it gives men in all aspects of their lives.
I thought it makes men competitive?
Anyhow, I admit that I am a noob at neuroscience. That is why I didnt really bother responding to the allegations raised - Quite simply, I couldnt. Thanks for the clarification though.
I’m quite familiar with neuroscience and psychology. And I don’t believe you, sorry Clair. I think you’ve heard some of those things… as much as everyone has that sits watching tabloid talk shows; but I don’t believe you’re any kind of an expert on the subject. If you were, you wouldn’t have been goading MansVoice.
And yes, I can argue that men aren’t more aggressive than women. That’s a stereotype that affects how people see men; and I don’t agree with it at all.
Men have more focus, more determination, are are more likely to take risks, and can separate their feelings from tasks at hand; but those aren’t aggression.
If you’re thinking that testosterone promotes aggression… it doesn’t. Men with low testosterone levels are more likely to be aggressive.
I haven’t met a woman yet that wasn’t at least as aggressive as the men I’ve known.
Alen, believe it or not, i already knew that stuff.
But Im not saying men and women are the SAME. Quite the contrary, we are very different, and the brain just tells us that. Very interesting stuff. If u only researched that to prove a point, id suggest further reasearch, its waaay fun.
BUt u cant really argue that men are not aggressive…thats what ur hard wired for. Women are hard wired for talking and the like, coz it makes for a stronger more efficient community (yes when utilised correctly…please dont go inot bitching about this..anyway, one could argue that is also to do with social hierarchy)
“more areas of the brain tend to fire when solving problems.”
(in women than men)
Reductio ad absurdum.
Men aren’t more aggressive than women. If you looked at your own behaviour you’d realize that pretty quickly. They do tend to be more motivated, though, in my experience.
The focus on neuroscience for gender differences at this stage is still asking for a lot of trouble. If you knew anything about the field you’d realize that too. However there are SOME findings that are being confirmed and do show that there are real gender differences in the way we think; flying in the face of decades of feminist rhetoric. The fact that these findings are coming out in a climate of political correctness shouldn’t be ignored.
The Interior Parietal Lobe is proportionally much larger than the IPL in women. indicating better mathematical and logical reasoning skills, 3D rotations and perceptions of time and space.
Women have larger Broca and Wernikes areas; showing a preference for more language relative to men.
So, to generalize; women like to talk a lot, men are good at interacting with the real world.
Men having more neurons in the cerebral coretex.
Women are more prone to dementia (likely related to point above)
While the Corpus Collosum has not been convincingly found to be different in men and women; more areas of the brain tend to fire when solving problems.
This is often touted by women as indicating that women are “smarter” because they are more holistic, and bring more to a problem. However, intelligence; as it is typically measured, tends to be higher in those that can focus thoughts and weed out noise. The above indicates that men have the capacility of bilateral thought; but when a problem is presented they have a greater ability to weed out noise, emotion, external stimulus; and focus on the problem at hand.
http://www.cerebromente.org.br/n11/mente/eisntein/cerebro-homens.html
May it stand the weather and storm of ages as long as the great ones of Giza mate. In fact, one better than they, may its true meaning never be lost in a cloud of antiquity.
The pharaohs too were hurting when they built the pyramids.
They were hurting for something awesome.
-Dick
If women were unpredictable I’d have to get married to get laid.
So another fool stumbles upon this site and exclaims. They say women are unpredictable but everything that they say is exactly the same as every other woman before them. Morons.