A woman president? More like, no fucking way.
I hate to be political as much as the next man — which means exactly that I love it more than I love breathing air or using my eyeballs for seeing.
Think about that for a second because you know that it’s true. We men love politics, it’s no secret. It’s as much a part of being man as getting animals drunk or being forever vigilant for the greatest and fastest shortcut of all time. Politics at its core is in fact the very core of man. It is a quest, but a quest for what? Bam. That’s what. How do you like that.
Before I continue let me stress that no woman under any circumstance should be venturing these very deepest waters of sophomoric thought as revelations of the type just witnessed (with many more to come) can be severely damaging.
Let us picture in our minds a mythical land that would embody only the manliest nature — and here of course I’m talking about Germany, you can see for yourself. Picnic benches of oak as thick as a cinder block as far as the eye can see, and beer in glass steins the weight of an airplane windshield being getting smashed together with abandon for the absolute fuck of it.
Do you think that in the metaphorical “topic hat” of such a place there exists perhaps a piece of paper that says, “How was your day?” or “Where my mother went wrong.”
Fuck no. No way. And in fact there exists no such topic hat in either reality or fantasy.
But why?
It because men in such a place of rampant manhood want to speak of only one thing: Politik. The politics of doing the job. The politics about doing the job. And the politics of getting the job done. You can no sooner squelch this desire than you can throw a dumpster into the middle of the street with your bare hands. It cannot be done.
I think that my point here is obvious: a woman will never ever in a million fucking years be president of the United States or of anywhere.
There are two simple reasons for this. There is no need for a third because the first two are so utterly conclusive. Observe as I blow the lid off the entire media hype and tornado of bullshit…
No woman will ever be president because:
1. No woman is a man.
2. See rule 1.
Done. The fact that men are better than women is merely a corollary at this point.
Let’s expand these principles to some degree of practice with the power of our mighty imaginations by temporarily suspending every single non-perversion of logic and placing a woman in the White House for just a moment. The stress on the mind from such an absurdity is taxing I know so this will be brief. It is some relief that the details of the scene are not important. It can be any scene — that’s the beauty of it; any scene in which Madam President is there with anyone else.
What she is thinking at any moment is precisely, ‘Am I doing a good job?’, ‘Does everyone think I’m a fraud?’, ‘Did I get everyone’s opinion?’
Utter bullshit.
As men we know inherently that this is absolutely no way to get the job done. This kind of lay-about, lolly-gagging thought isn’t even preparing to get the job done. It’s a lame fuck around, and a waste of time.
Women do not understand politics at its core as much as a dog or a screwdriver does not understand crossing a busy street. Sure, you can guide them safely across. You can carry a screw driver to the store and buy it a cookie, but in the end it has no goddamn idea what’s going on — and that’s really what we’re talking about here.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 24 … 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 [4] 3 2 1 » Show All
Arielle, aren’t you the one who has betrayed her own sex? Hmmm, my eyes are fine, perhaps you are the blind one?
geezer, Oz hasn’t ever had a female prime minister. Does that mean we are just as much a superpower as the states? Your logic is specious.
Nicole posted a very impressive list of women presidents from around the world. Nicole, you have my thanks, my hat is off to you. I say emphatically, well done, very well done. In one fell swoop you have established beyond all doubt, why the U.S.A. stands as the world’s sole Super Power. The U.S.A. still has men in charge and because of this, it remains firm in it’s place as “THE� world Super Power. Thank you for proving that men are better than women so very, effectively.
Female,
Have you had your own vision checked? This phenomena may simply be your own need for corrective lenses.
That’s so laughable and dumb that I nearly spit coffee on my desk.
-Dick
Montreal — Tens of thousands of people ignored frigid temperatures Saturday to lead a worldwide day of protest against global warming.
Is frigidity causing global warming?
I don’t know what the other Oshtrayans in here think but I believe visibility is getting worse and although still extremely sunny, on a hot day, it’s not blindingly clear with pitch black shadows everywhere like it used to be.
Australia hasn’t signed it either.
In addition to global warming, we now have to consider global dimming.
Which essentially means there is now less sunlight hitting the earth due to the pollution in the atmosphere (not good for solar power operators). This also means that evaporation rates are down.
http://www.globalissues.org/EnvIssues/GlobalWarming/globaldimming.asp
China’s wholehearted embrace of Capitalism is a bit of a concern. Hopefully petrol will rise to unaffordable levels and put a stop to the massive emissions increase that will result from every Chinese person driving a humvee. What a stupid vehicle. I don’t care who invented it, they are an oxygen thief and should be dealt with accordingly.
Wow. The number of errors Nicole makes is impressive.
The US Senate (not Bush), under Democratic control (Hint: not Bush’s party), rejected the ultimate terms of the accord 95-0 in July 1997. (Hint: This was three and a half years before Bush became president!)
Clinton never signed it; Gore did, in early 1998 (nearly 3 years before Bush became President!). Knowing that his own party (and the Republicans) repudiated the treaty completely, it was never submitted to the Senate for ratification, and thus remains non-binding on the US.
“Kyoto agreement which stated that America would use less fossil fuel to help preserve the environment” The agreement says nothing of the kind. Read it. Moreover, the Kyoto agreement will do next to nothing to assist the environment, while destroying millions of jobs.
“he refused, insisting America could use whatever it wanted.” Like your fantasies about Bush being in a time machine and travelling back in time to mind control Democratic Senators and Clinton, he did this and it’s not remotely his position.
I’m appalled at the level of ignorance displayed in your post.
There’s a word for that: idiocy.
We all know he’s literate.
He still asks a woman if he can pee though. Snigger.
Yes, Nicole, and did you know that if you burp, fart, and sneeze at the same time, you will die???
There’s another word for it: off-topic.
Men are better than women.
-Dick
You know when Bush was offered an opportunity to sign the Kyoto agreement which stated that America would use less fossil fuel to help preserve the environment. But he refused, insisting America could use whatever it wanted.
There’s a word for that: idiocy.
Hortencia, you obviously didn’t read what I wrote: Bush has degrees from Yale and Harvard. He is president of the US. How he got into college is another topic entirely. I am countering your point, i.e. he can barely read. Anyone who would put forth such a proposition is… I don’t know. It’s such a odd assertion, so strange and so Twilight Zonish. I’m at a loss for words.
He’s not illiterate. He’s simply not. For you to say so is libelous and irresponsible. In other words: womanly.
-Dick
His Daddy was president, he would never got into Yale or Harvard without that.
Bush received his undergraduate degree from Yale. He received his MBA from Harvard. He flew fighter jets in the service. He is president of the United States. Barely literate? Hortencia, I don’t know what else to say.
George W Bush jnr is doing a brilliant job though isn’t he? Not that he’s helped enormously by Condelezza Rice (not a good example, but then find a decent republican) or anything, Bush is barely literate!
While you’re right that some women in these countries are happy to be subservient, many are not (a resent magazine article written by a women living in Iraq really opened my eyes) so don’t these women have the option of being considered equal to men? They should not be held back because not every woman feels the same.
Okay so you want all people in all countries to be equal, a nobe aim indeed but unfortunately it will never happen. What you must understand and appreciate is that not all people want this and indeed some people’s religions dictate otherwise and so women are happy to be subservient, and it is wrong to intefere with the way of life in these countries.