A woman president? More like, no fucking way.
I hate to be political as much as the next man — which means exactly that I love it more than I love breathing air or using my eyeballs for seeing.
Think about that for a second because you know that it’s true. We men love politics, it’s no secret. It’s as much a part of being man as getting animals drunk or being forever vigilant for the greatest and fastest shortcut of all time. Politics at its core is in fact the very core of man. It is a quest, but a quest for what? Bam. That’s what. How do you like that.
Before I continue let me stress that no woman under any circumstance should be venturing these very deepest waters of sophomoric thought as revelations of the type just witnessed (with many more to come) can be severely damaging.
Let us picture in our minds a mythical land that would embody only the manliest nature — and here of course I’m talking about Germany, you can see for yourself. Picnic benches of oak as thick as a cinder block as far as the eye can see, and beer in glass steins the weight of an airplane windshield being getting smashed together with abandon for the absolute fuck of it.
Do you think that in the metaphorical “topic hat” of such a place there exists perhaps a piece of paper that says, “How was your day?” or “Where my mother went wrong.”
Fuck no. No way. And in fact there exists no such topic hat in either reality or fantasy.
But why?
It because men in such a place of rampant manhood want to speak of only one thing: Politik. The politics of doing the job. The politics about doing the job. And the politics of getting the job done. You can no sooner squelch this desire than you can throw a dumpster into the middle of the street with your bare hands. It cannot be done.
I think that my point here is obvious: a woman will never ever in a million fucking years be president of the United States or of anywhere.
There are two simple reasons for this. There is no need for a third because the first two are so utterly conclusive. Observe as I blow the lid off the entire media hype and tornado of bullshit…
No woman will ever be president because:
1. No woman is a man.
2. See rule 1.
Done. The fact that men are better than women is merely a corollary at this point.
Let’s expand these principles to some degree of practice with the power of our mighty imaginations by temporarily suspending every single non-perversion of logic and placing a woman in the White House for just a moment. The stress on the mind from such an absurdity is taxing I know so this will be brief. It is some relief that the details of the scene are not important. It can be any scene — that’s the beauty of it; any scene in which Madam President is there with anyone else.
What she is thinking at any moment is precisely, ‘Am I doing a good job?’, ‘Does everyone think I’m a fraud?’, ‘Did I get everyone’s opinion?’
Utter bullshit.
As men we know inherently that this is absolutely no way to get the job done. This kind of lay-about, lolly-gagging thought isn’t even preparing to get the job done. It’s a lame fuck around, and a waste of time.
Women do not understand politics at its core as much as a dog or a screwdriver does not understand crossing a busy street. Sure, you can guide them safely across. You can carry a screw driver to the store and buy it a cookie, but in the end it has no goddamn idea what’s going on — and that’s really what we’re talking about here.
Related Articles:
October 30th, 2007 at 12:51 am - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
Aww, poor little MansVoice. So stunted in philosophical growth.
Really, WHAT part of the womans brain makes it inferior to a mans brain? Please, do enlighten me. The human brain makes you who you are. So, do tell.
Or if it is simpler for you, spill me a bit of psychological evidence since you say you are not familiar with even basic neurology. They can easily over lap.
October 30th, 2007 at 1:01 am - IP Man-Hash: 78e5f8aa67d98
I am stunted in “philosphical growth”. Spare me the ad hominems and address my replies.
But let us go with your premise for the moment.
How am I in any way “stunted”? I am a Valedictorian with near perfect grades and good ECs to boot. I have been on panels which covered numerous themes such as “geopolitics” to “national defence” and have engaged reputable professors and senior politicians at their level. I dont think you have achieved as much as I do in highschool or college so spare me the “philosophical bullshit”.
What part of the woman’s brain you ask? Having a brain doesnt mean shit if you dont know how to use it. But let us go into science shall we?
Men, whose brains are generally larger. One such study showed that men have larger brains than women, a 100 gram difference after correcting for body size
Evidence : To determine if there was a link between gender and intelligence, and perhaps between brain size and intelligence, Rushton and a colleague analyzed the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) scores from 100,000 17- and 18-year-olds.
G-factor
When Rushton and colleagues weighted each SAT question by an established general intelligence factor called the g-factor, they discovered that males surpassed females by an average of 3.6 IQ points.
For example (from the NYT article):
Among college-bound seniors who took the math portion of the SAT in 2001, for example, nearly twice as many boys as girls scored over 700, and the ratio skews ever more male the closer one gets to 800, the top tally. Boys are also likelier than girls to get nearly all the answers wrong.
Something you don’t often hear when people are whining about the “unfairness” SAT score disparities.
Back to Chavez:
For years, feminists have tried to explain away these achievement differences by suggesting girls are not encouraged properly to pursue math and science. Lately, some have even started blaming how these subjects are taught: too much emphasis on competition and being “right,” too little on collaborative learning and nurturing self-esteem.
That and the fact that women are being pumped with estrogen making them think with emotions instead of “logic and deduction”.
October 30th, 2007 at 5:20 am - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
:) Oh no dear MansVoice. It is the limbic system that is responsible for our emotions, as well as yours. And if you think that limits us, let’s remember the fact that men are physically more aggressive right? Well, I’m afraid the the R-complex is responsible for that…in case you didn’t know, the r-complex is the least evolved brain out of the three.
Anyway, those facts would mean a bit more if you could give me the source so that I can make a source analysis of it/them.
But seriously one or two tests backing up your argument wasn’t what I was asking for. Even if it is your own logical hypothesis, tell me the differences between male and females brains that puts women at a disadvantage for everything, or most things.
(p.s - Brain size obviously means nothing, 1) Look at the animal kingdom. Don’t animals larger then us have larger brains then us? We’re still smarter then them and 2) The whole brain is not used, there fore extra brain is a waste of space anyway.)
October 30th, 2007 at 8:19 am - IP Man-Hash: 2963e11061bb5
I have never said it was the brain that controls our emotions. I was adding to it as an after thought. That is what estrogen does to women.
Animals have larger heads. That doesnt mean their brains are huge? Einstein had a larger brain than the average human.
Like I said, I am no expert at neurology and I dont pretend to be.
Granted that even men and women both have brains of near-similar size and intelligence. Well, one gender uses it, another doesnt. That is what makes men better than women.
November 6th, 2007 at 10:20 pm - IP Man-Hash: 08b99e39e2a09
It’s simply not worth the time to debate her. Believe me, I’ve tried with the women in my life. Through sincere, thoughtful and caring dialogues, it’s been proven to me, (beyond any question of a doubt), that it leads nowhere.
Something I’ve learned over time: there’s no need to debate with children, those who are loony, or women.
November 13th, 2007 at 6:50 am - IP Man-Hash: c49de3df26f62
That’s like saying you don’t have to like chicken to be black. Complete and utter bullshit!
November 13th, 2007 at 8:04 am - IP Man-Hash: 0364a2b269277
@ New men: Welcome on board.
December 13th, 2007 at 12:00 am - IP Man-Hash: f645fd4eb8584
I’m absolutely astounded that such a website exists with such a profound hatred of women! after seeing the Dr Phil show i had to check this out for myself.
DIck, how you must be hurting!! I cant imagine what pain you must be experiencing to go to all the trouble of constructing such a hateful website inciting disrespect and promoting women as intellectually inferior. after all we all know that there are many forms of intelligence, not just academic. Men and women co-exist- one gender is no better nor worse than the other, just different and I believe complementary.
God Dick, what happened to you! was it your mother- did she fail to nurture you or protect you as a child as every child has a right to, or was it a lover who hurt you. I have many wonderful men in my life including colleagues, my sons and husband and cant imagine and have never come across such a sad person in all my life.
please get some help- women are not all bad. You are truly missing out on some wonderful experiences by closing yourself to all women.
December 13th, 2007 at 12:11 am - IP Man-Hash: 720a12647a390
Are you equally suprised feminist websites exist that espouse genital torture of their male offspring?
This site doesn’t promote hatred, its satire blended with home truth’s. Get over yourself, and I think you typo’d your name “Disgusting”.
Its interesting though, the number of women who’s pop-psychology thinks man-thought is a result of an abusive mother seems to suggest deep down they know how abusive mothers can be. They’re obviously aware of the stats for the incidence of child abuse which weigh so heavily towards women being the predominant perpetrators of it in our society. I’m surprised she didn’t throw in an attack on penis size as well.
Go Freud yourself some place else “Disgusting”, and get the fuck off this website.
December 13th, 2007 at 12:23 am - IP Man-Hash: 6d3bb32787b07
So another fool stumbles upon this site and exclaims. They say women are unpredictable but everything that they say is exactly the same as every other woman before them. Morons.
December 13th, 2007 at 12:30 am - IP Man-Hash: 720a12647a390
If women were unpredictable I’d have to get married to get laid.
December 13th, 2007 at 1:48 am - IP Man-Hash: e36376410e1aa
The pharaohs too were hurting when they built the pyramids.
They were hurting for something awesome.
-Dick
December 13th, 2007 at 1:53 am - IP Man-Hash: 720a12647a390
May it stand the weather and storm of ages as long as the great ones of Giza mate. In fact, one better than they, may its true meaning never be lost in a cloud of antiquity.
December 13th, 2007 at 6:58 am - IP Man-Hash: a04ab4ccee142
Reductio ad absurdum.
Men aren’t more aggressive than women. If you looked at your own behaviour you’d realize that pretty quickly. They do tend to be more motivated, though, in my experience.
The focus on neuroscience for gender differences at this stage is still asking for a lot of trouble. If you knew anything about the field you’d realize that too. However there are SOME findings that are being confirmed and do show that there are real gender differences in the way we think; flying in the face of decades of feminist rhetoric. The fact that these findings are coming out in a climate of political correctness shouldn’t be ignored.
The Interior Parietal Lobe is proportionally much larger than the IPL in women. indicating better mathematical and logical reasoning skills, 3D rotations and perceptions of time and space.
Women have larger Broca and Wernikes areas; showing a preference for more language relative to men.
So, to generalize; women like to talk a lot, men are good at interacting with the real world.
Men having more neurons in the cerebral coretex.
Women are more prone to dementia (likely related to point above)
While the Corpus Collosum has not been convincingly found to be different in men and women; more areas of the brain tend to fire when solving problems.
This is often touted by women as indicating that women are “smarter” because they are more holistic, and bring more to a problem. However, intelligence; as it is typically measured, tends to be higher in those that can focus thoughts and weed out noise. The above indicates that men have the capacility of bilateral thought; but when a problem is presented they have a greater ability to weed out noise, emotion, external stimulus; and focus on the problem at hand.
http://www.cerebromente.org.br/n11/mente/eisntein/cerebro-homens.html
December 13th, 2007 at 7:05 am - IP Man-Hash: a04ab4ccee142
“more areas of the brain tend to fire when solving problems.”
(in women than men)
December 13th, 2007 at 8:09 am - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
Alen, believe it or not, i already knew that stuff.
But Im not saying men and women are the SAME. Quite the contrary, we are very different, and the brain just tells us that. Very interesting stuff. If u only researched that to prove a point, id suggest further reasearch, its waaay fun.
BUt u cant really argue that men are not aggressive…thats what ur hard wired for. Women are hard wired for talking and the like, coz it makes for a stronger more efficient community (yes when utilised correctly…please dont go inot bitching about this..anyway, one could argue that is also to do with social hierarchy)
December 13th, 2007 at 8:54 am - IP Man-Hash: a04ab4ccee142
I’m quite familiar with neuroscience and psychology. And I don’t believe you, sorry Clair. I think you’ve heard some of those things… as much as everyone has that sits watching tabloid talk shows; but I don’t believe you’re any kind of an expert on the subject. If you were, you wouldn’t have been goading MansVoice.
And yes, I can argue that men aren’t more aggressive than women. That’s a stereotype that affects how people see men; and I don’t agree with it at all.
Men have more focus, more determination, are are more likely to take risks, and can separate their feelings from tasks at hand; but those aren’t aggression.
If you’re thinking that testosterone promotes aggression… it doesn’t. Men with low testosterone levels are more likely to be aggressive.
I haven’t met a woman yet that wasn’t at least as aggressive as the men I’ve known.
December 13th, 2007 at 8:58 am - IP Man-Hash: 2f854bed461cf
I thought it makes men competitive?
Anyhow, I admit that I am a noob at neuroscience. That is why I didnt really bother responding to the allegations raised - Quite simply, I couldnt. Thanks for the clarification though.
December 13th, 2007 at 9:19 am - IP Man-Hash: a04ab4ccee142
The role of testosterone has been grossly misrepresented; and that’s only beginning to change. There’s been a lot of bias on the subject.
Here are some factoids to help
- Testosterone exists in both men and women; but is higher in men.
- Testosterone is responsible for sex drive in men and women
- Testosterone levels fluctuate over the day, and rise in cases of competition/challenge and sex
- In cases of competition, testosterone levels will remain high for some time after the event for the winner; but will plummet for the loser
- Men with high testosterone levels are generally happier, and are in much better health, mentally and physically; but tend to engage in riskier behaviour
- Men with low testosterone levels are moodier, have low sex drives and poorer health
In summary… what testosterone appears to be doing, is giving the body a reward system for taking risks, and helping to engage in persuing that risk. That applies to sex and conflict. That’s not aggression. That’s not necessarily competition. Both of those things can exist without engaging in risk. But testosterone does help the body and mind in dealing with the conflict. It’s also interesting that testosterone drops for losers in conflict. As though the body cuts off the reward system so that the person doesn’t engage in that risky behavior.
What I tell women is that if they want to understand how testosterone affect men’s behavior; just think of how they feel when they’re really really horny and just want to jump a guy. That’s testosterone, and that’s the kind of focus and grit that it gives men in all aspects of their lives.
December 13th, 2007 at 10:09 am - IP Man-Hash: e24370fe2bb3c
So she simply won’t be president because she is a woman
You haven’t bothered to hear he points or veiws?
I personally like Obama, he has the same standpoints as I do, but as does Hilary