A Woman’s Version of Self-Reliance
A woman with self-reliance is like a bowling ball rolling down the street. You don’t need to pay attention to it unless it’s your bowling ball or your car in the way. If either of those are true, get your running shoes on or your credit card out. You’re about to pay for a fuck up.
No matter how many signs there are in front of an out of control bowling ball — telling it to turn around, shut the fuck up, or not return the calls of a guy who will only let it see his penis in the dark — the bowling ball won’t notice. Bowling balls are as dense as trash-compacted shit.
So are women.
Women and bowling balls will destroy anything in their path to satisfy their compulsive greed. Women crave attention and bowling balls crave speed; both will destroy lives, children, and their marriage to get more. Women are unlike bowling balls because no matter how drunk you get a bowling ball, you can’t fuck it. Like mine, your dick is way too big.
A woman’s version of self-reliance is fucking up so much on her own, she doesn’t have to ask for help. Someone has to physically force “help” up her metaphysical ass.
Women don’t have the man-brains suited for problem solving like men do. That’s why women have only invented like two things and neither was something that had a compass on it for convenience. What the fuck would a woman ever need with a compass? They don’t even know how to use them.
“Does the direction pointing at me tell me which way I’m going?”
That depends. Does it point to Retard Town?
A woman with “self-reliance” is one who is in denial and locked into a life-long scavenger hunt with no clue what her first mystery item even looks like.
1. Competence.
All a woman has to do to solve a problem is open her mouth. That’s where the old saying comes from, “A man in time saves nine.” Like when a woman doesn’t ask her husband if it’s safe to back out of a parking space at 20 miles an hour with platform sandals haphazardly on her feet and whilst on a cell phone — or when she doesn’t ask a man what it means to “make a right when the fucking internet directions say to make a right?”
A man in time saves nine.
Women who are “self-reliant” are really just silent time-bombs of cluster fuck, waltzing around making problems big enough for ten men when one man could have fixed it easily by himself an hour ago. When it comes to a full-fledged fuck up like a rear tire that is now a backseat, or dinner reservations that are now off by an hour, ten men have to fix it.
One man could have fixed either in the first place by not letting a woman drive. That’s a loss of Man Points.
Women are as obsessed with self-reliance as Dumbo was with his magic feather. The only difference between women and Dumbo is that in order to make Dumbo fly, we have to suspend our disbelief. In order to make women independent, we have to put Starbucks on every corner so they can’t possibly get lost, make everything free including loans and credit cards, and reverse numbers so that “children raised by single mothers are eight times more likely to go to prison” actually means “less likely”.
Just look at all those school shootings. According to prison statistics, those would have been less likely to happen if those children had been raised by single men. Women can’t even be reliant properly.
Related Articles:
December 12th, 2007 at 9:29 pm - IP Man-Hash: a2517bfb5e966
“Your attitude is the same as most women, it’s all about what he can do for you, and what you are saying when you claim you could marry him because you could not be submissive has nothing to do with you submitting to authority but everything to do with you not being able to control him. ”
This was the only thing that you were not right about- I am not controlling in relationships- I do have a lot of other flaws, like being a bad comunicator- but I have no desire to control men when I am in a relationships with them.
Also- I don’t believe in divorce, and wouldn’t do it.
If I recognize that I have these problems of not wanting my life to be like this, isn’t it better than doing what most women do? They get married anyway, and make their husband’s life a big fucking mess. I think recognizing your traits and acting responsibly is a good plan.
December 12th, 2007 at 9:38 pm - IP Man-Hash: a2517bfb5e966
I wasn’t talking about love specifically- I was talking about marriage- I honestly don’t have experience with either - I guess Clair is right about Zardoz being right….
December 12th, 2007 at 9:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
Why don’t u just marry someone that dosent mind having an equal partnership, where u both take charge of what ur best at, regardless of gender?
December 12th, 2007 at 9:45 pm - IP Man-Hash: f8c2ecac66d1a
if you are already living together then you are in denial, the difference between married and not married when living together is either party can leave at any time, the only reason you would live with someone yet not marry them is you don’t want to lose that card, the reason you refuse to give up that card is it is a good way to remain completely in control of yourself/resources regardless of the good of the couple therefore it is all about control.
marrage is not about who has control, it is about the partners working towards the best intrest of the couple, not just themselves. Who has control at a given moment is a moot point when both are acting in the couples best intrests instead of only their self.
December 12th, 2007 at 9:49 pm - IP Man-Hash: a2517bfb5e966
December 12th, 2007 at 9:50 pm - IP Man-Hash: a2517bfb5e966
I don’t know men who genuinely feel that way- not at their core. That’s the environment I’d need to coexist with someone succesfully - but not sure its truely out there- people seem to either want to be in charge or they want someone to be in charge of them, and I don’t like the idea of either.
December 12th, 2007 at 9:53 pm - IP Man-Hash: 349c2dc95fedb
Agreed and I wont have it any other way.
Someone has to call the final shots and I wont live for a facade of an “equal” partnership just to boost the woman’s ego. Since the sole reason for an “equal” partnership is to make the woman FEEL and/or think she is an equal…Not…
December 12th, 2007 at 9:56 pm - IP Man-Hash: 720a12647a390
In Australia, just living together in a de facto relationship for a 2 year qualifying period entitles the same rights and privileges to half of everything. Its a get out of it free card, without any waiting period, and the added bonus of still getting half of the house and car and all the kids.
December 12th, 2007 at 10:02 pm - IP Man-Hash: f8c2ecac66d1a
sounds like I should move to Australia… in Canada it’s 3-6 months depending on the province
December 12th, 2007 at 10:03 pm - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
Exactly. Someone has to call the final shot, either come to a mutual agreement, or whoever is best at whatever is going on should make the final shot- male or female.
December 12th, 2007 at 10:04 pm - IP Man-Hash: 720a12647a390
Ouch…. Damn… I’d be a pauper if that were the case…… Much sympathy mate, I thought it was bad enough here….
December 12th, 2007 at 10:07 pm - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
uhh..this is off topic…. but uz should download (legally of course :P) the song “She’s and Angel to You, But she a Devil to Me” by the Click 5…
I laughed when I heard it, cause it reminds me of this site somehow..:D
December 12th, 2007 at 10:08 pm - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6
sorry its “Angel to you, Devil to me”
December 12th, 2007 at 10:13 pm - IP Man-Hash: a2517bfb5e966
OK- the guy is hypothetical- I am not in a relationship of any kind, so don’t think I’m causing harm to someone as we are speaking about this. Also, I would not live with a man unless I were married to him. I know its pretty common for people to move in together quickly- I think its a bad idea, just from what I have seen.
This is a really good comment. I think you are 100% right.
So- so………So….So I think you are right……….damn. So, do you think that the best interests of all married couples and families as far as “gender roles” - uh…what do you think about that? Do you think there is one way to go about that? I think your comment is right- I’m thinking (without knowing) that we might disagree on what is best as far as gender roles in a marriage.
Marriage should not be about control- but then - Damn, you know there is something here that I want to ask that I just can’t verbalize. Sorry.
December 12th, 2007 at 10:16 pm - IP Man-Hash: a2517bfb5e966
Are you kidding me? I think in the US it depends on the state- but I think in mine, you actually have to be married
1.ceremony (preformed by person with liscense)
2.witness
3.certificate
We don’t have “common law” marriages in my state- most states have done away with that, I think.
December 12th, 2007 at 10:24 pm - IP Man-Hash: 720a12647a390
The US Constitution and Bill of Rights provide men a fighting chance at some semblance of genuine “equality”. Other nations that imported feminism don’t all have a fighting chance while manginas happily say “yes sweetheart, whatever makes you happy dear” just to ensure they get laid every second saturday night.
December 12th, 2007 at 10:32 pm - IP Man-Hash: f8c2ecac66d1a
Traditional gender roles came about from the partners playing to their strenghts. When you go back 100 years, it made sense for the woman to look after the kids and household while the man to workout side the home for income as the vast majority of jobs were manual labour.
Since this is no longer the case there should be some flex, but when it comes down to it, once children come into the picture it makes more sense long term financially for the male to be the primary bread winner since he won’t need to take time as much time off.
I think really what happens traditionally should be a guide, but not the final say on how marrage should work.
For example when married army couples have one member deployed, for up to 15 months the other has to make sure every thing is taken care of and ready for the others return, basicly taking over both set of roles whatever they may be.
In the end as long as someone is doing what needs to be done, which partner that does it is inconsequential.
The question is not really who’s job it should be based on past circumstances but who it makes the most sense to do it right now.
December 12th, 2007 at 10:33 pm - IP Man-Hash: a2517bfb5e966
That seems so bizare- 6 months?!? 3 is crazy.
I’m just going to do the world a favor and keep my woman brain away from marriage- just in case. I’d like to think I’d never get divorced, but just to be on the safe side. I’m keeping myself away from relationships with you people so I don’t contribute to the problem. I’ tyring to spread the word among other women (without telling them about mbtw, of course) but they don’t understand what I’m trying to tell them.
December 12th, 2007 at 10:38 pm - IP Man-Hash: a2517bfb5e966
This is great stuff- I do think it’s best for kids to be raised by parents- and If I were married with kids, I would choose that over a second income, regardless of sacrifice- so long as our needs were met.
Your comment is really perfect.
December 12th, 2007 at 10:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: a2517bfb5e966
I guess we didn’t disagree so much after all.