Watcher all but one form of torture, prolonged nagging.

The real irony is that women like usemenonly and you, Alexis, are speeding the change along by antagonising the men on this site – most amusing!

Very amusing. Just a matter of time girls, your greed will be your own undoing.

Spot on, Watcher!
While I would never waste actual pearls on reality-denying swine, I’m not completely averse to giving even the dumbest of bitches – for example, usemensmoney – an occasional pat on the head while tossing them a biscuit (their posts DO MORE to prove our and Dick’s points than even we can. Now THAT is ironically amusing!).

*New York City, 1982 – feminist Brenda Berkman “successfully” sues the city, resulting in firefighter tests being modified, physical standards lowered, and the cheering of the “We can do anythiiiing a man can do!” crowd
(this isn’t uncommon – where female firefighters exist, they are VERY FEW in number, and/or the standards to pass them have been MODIFIED – remember: Feeeeeeeeelings are much more important than public safety!!!).

*The “Family” Court system – NOT debatable, the FACT that whimmin receive special treatment, by design (therefore, MEN are systemically discriminated against).

*Whimmin disrespecting the WRITTEN wishes (rule of “No Women Allowed”) by ONLY ONE man, Dick Masterson – the evidence lies all over this site (imagine these harpies in real life; and expand this problem to all those proximal).

WhimminsVersionOfSelfReliance-”BecauseIFeeeeelThatWay!”

Alexis, do you really believe that women today have a achieved a permanent level of status in society? If you do you are very, very wrong. Feminists claiming to represent all woman have been waging a war against the family unit and men for the last 30 years. At first it was tolerable but as over the decades pass and law is layered upon initiative, upon law. Well let’s say now they are genuinely hurting many men, too many for others to ignore.

Men are getting in the mood to fight back!

I believe the metaphorical ‘battle of the sexes’ has yet to be fought and I can assure you, women will regret ever starting it.
If childbirth is the primary function of women, fighting is the primary function of man. Be that prey, rivals or enemies in fact anything that gets in his way. Over thousands of years he has become rather good at it.

Truly, men now have become ‘Gods of War’ – in all forms of warfare.

I’m not joking. Allow me to present the evidence. Men imagined, designed and built thermonuclear weapons, predator drones, nuclear attack submarines. He trained his body and mind to the utmost to become the perfect warrior. We call those arts Kung-Fu or Ninjitsu, boxing. That’s to say nothing of the tools he imagined and built such as katanas, sniper-rifles, SAMs or Mini-guns.

Men fight good!

Men dreamt and perfected torture, propaganda and marketing (Oh yes! marketing is most certainly a form of warfare)

Men fight very good!

…and that’s the ‘gender’ feminists want to rile-up and fight, they would have better luck fighting against salt-water crocodiles using only high-heeled shoes!

Men are beginning to realise women have snatched power from them but have completely forgotten that it comes with RESPONSIBILITY. If women can’t take responsibility, and they never do; PMS, ‘battered wives syndrome’, ‘preg-head’, ‘I think with my heart’. Then they should not have authority, it’s not right and not fair!

Simple.

More and more men are beginning to see that, they are getting angry.

Men coming through domestic courts, they too are getting angry.

This anger is building. Every ‘positive discrimination action’, every ‘record divorce settlement’, every ‘woman given millions for hurt feelings’, every woman that gets an easy ride in the courts makes this anger burn that much more fiercely. It is fuel on the fire.

I don’t see blood on the street but I do see a social/political war looming, one that women will obviously lose. It will happen under the guise of something like an Anglo-Christian moral resurgence, I’m just guess there, but change is coming. It’s inevitable.

The real irony is that women like usemenonly and you, Alexis, are speeding the change along by antagonising the men on this site – most amusing!

Because it’s so obvious that he isn’t serious.

It’s utterly impossible for a human being to survive being as low on IQ as he makes himself out to be.
He has yet to make a single valid point – he basically just rants on and on trying to be as offensive as possible. There is NO LOGICAL STRUCTURE or intelligent thought process present WHATSOEVER.
Surely when you consider Darwin’s evolution of species – “survival of the fittest” – it becomes crystal clear that if he genuinely lacked mental faculties to this extent he would have long ago accidentally and brutally killed himself.
If he is serious, then he must have spent his entire life under a rock with absolutely no educational, cultural, or social contact. He gives himself away, of course, with his fairly evolved vocabulary.

This leads us to the obvious conclusion that he is NOT to be taken seriously!!
He’s quite the smart businessman – he has discovered that saying the stupidest and most offensive possible things he can think of, with absolutely no proof, logic, or sensible arguments, gets a HUGE rise out of people, especially when he directs it at half of the world’s population.

I salute you, Dick, for being secretly so smart. You’re infamous, you’ve been on TV, things you’ve probably dreamed of all your life.
It’s just too bad that in the process you’ve made yourself out to be pitied scum and now tens of thousands of people would leap at the opportunity to decapitate you.
:)

The only thing that’s terrifying is all the gullible foolish young men that take him seriously and so enthusiastically side with him… you are definitely committing social suicide. With an M-32.

Should be “you’re pathetic”.
As in ‘You Are’ Pathetic.

I know that part of the English language is hard to grasp.
Maybe you should write it down?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nTasT5h0LEg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JZAHl5_LTGQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3U0udLH974

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NSsa_-GaVhY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Es52WQKLumI

I think of it as legalized stealing- are there any other instances that ya’ll know of where this is the case, that law promotes stealing of property/money?

Federal taxes?

http://www.freetalklive.com – a free radio against federal goverment stealing your hard earned money. (Sorry if links irritate you, Dick. <3 )

They prefer to blame the gun; which was sitting in a drawer doing nothing until the Degenerate, raised by a single mom, grabbed it.

Makes no sense, but it avoids accountability and The Truth. Which women avoid like the plague. It always makes them look dumb. Because they are.

see said:

MeanInGreen said:

So, do you think that the best interests of all married couples and families as far as “gender roles”

Traditional gender roles came about from the partners playing to their strenghts. When you go back 100 years, it made sense for the woman to look after the kids and household while the man to workout side the home for income as the vast majority of jobs were manual labour.

Since this is no longer the case there should be some flex, but when it comes down to it, once children come into the picture it makes more sense long term financially for the male to be the primary bread winner since he won’t need to take time as much time off.

I think really what happens traditionally should be a guide, but not the final say on how marrage should work.

For example when married army couples have one member deployed, for up to 15 months the other has to make sure every thing is taken care of and ready for the others return, basicly taking over both set of roles whatever they may be.

In the end as long as someone is doing what needs to be done, which partner that does it is inconsequential.

The question is not really who’s job it should be based on past circumstances but who it makes the most sense to do it right now.

This is great stuff- I do think it’s best for kids to be raised by parents- and If I were married with kids, I would choose that over a second income, regardless of sacrifice- so long as our needs were met.

Your comment is really perfect.

Amen! A fresh breeze of common, good sense! It take two to bring a child into the world. The only crime is not taking proper responsibility for it, and involving talk show hosts and an audience while it plays in traffic.
This comment is a lighthouse.

We have more powerful orgasms than you fuckwits

Can you provide medical evidence to support that theory? Or are you just making shit up?

Suffer, morons. The definition of thirst is dehydration, basically, for you dogs, meaning “loss of water”. Beer will not rehydrate you, fools.

Actually, that’s only half true. Alcohol is a diuretic, and yes, it will dehydrate you. However, beer contains MUCH more water in it than it does alcohol. A single beer has virtually no dehydration effect on the body. In fact, alcohol is actually healthy for the body in small doses. It helps regulate the digestion amongst other things.
The problem occurs when someone drinks 4 or 5 beers. Then the diuretic effect causes the body to expel much of it’s moisture in the form of urinating, thus, dehydrating you. (That’s why you have to pee when your drink alcohol than when you drink water.)

I have a georgeous, 6′ 2″ God boyfriend who screams and moans when I fuck him, and he is beautiful. He spins me out he is so devine. You wankers are useless.

*laughs hard* So what? What does that have to do with anything? Why would you even tell us that? What point were you trying to make?

From some of the posts earlier on here, it sounds like it’d actually really be easy to ACCIDENTALLY marry someone- especially in fucking Canada!! my God!

But as a side note, I bet there are a lot of women who fuck up marriages – not because of feminism, but because they feel the same way I do- fear/resentment of the idea of losing their freedom. In their thoughts, that might morph itself into the idea of being oppressed I guess- for the sake of giving it a name, if they can’t understand the real source of those feelings. I hear this idea buried in conversations with women a lot- I don’t point it out though, because what good could really come of that?

- But the weird thing is, they all still buy into that idea of marriage that everyone is out their promoting- Not sure what that is all about- Another example of women being confused, maybe- just taking what people are selling and not stopping to think if its what they really want or if they’d be any good at it… Everyone is promoting this thing, and nobody can fucking do it anyway- so I think maybe we should all just calm down. Your chances are less that heads or tails with it. Plus, you have to trust the other person with (& for) the rest of your life – that can’t be a good idea, can it?

Are you the guy whose girlfriend got him to help move her across the country and then started acting crazy?