The Second Step is Admitting It

Unlike women, men can be a whole shit load of things over the course of their lives — and all without relying on government quotas or miniskirts. To men that’s an important difference.

We can accelerate in academia for one, we can also become top businessmen in sharp looking suits, or we can simply be good parents. That’s our prerogative as men: whatever we want and however we want to do it.

However, while exercising so much responsibility, we men, from time to time, can also be wrong.

Not in the way that women are wrong, of course. The way a man can be wrong is like placing the fork and knife on the wrong side of the plate. Who cares, everyone still eats. The way that women are usually wrong is by throwing the flatware in the pool, burning dinner, and then playing the period card like its Uno.

Uno! Great. As if women have ever had more than one card.

It’s a widely bullshit myth that men can’t admit they’re wrong. Men admit they’re wrong all the time. There’s more than three billion men in the world right now all taking care of business and responsibilities at lighting fast speeds and in a million different directions. With all that man power flying around fucking of course The Noid is eventually going to show up and ruin a pizza or two. There’s nothing wrong with that. The only thing wrong is the bullshit myth.

No, men admit their wrong. And when they do, they’ll make it right and that’ll be the end of it.

See that’s the first way that men are better than women at admitting they’re wrong. To a woman, being wrong is a two out of a three step process — just like everything else in a woman’s life: two out of three. There’s the fuck up, which they make plenty of, from their history degrees to their mixed fucking signals to their prison pen pals; then there’s the admitting it. And that’s where a woman’s journey ends in a maelstrom of tears and snot and attention. Men on the other hand cross that goal line of absolution and fix the mistake. They take care of it, and they clear their permanent record of jackass doings.

So why don’t women go all the way? It’s not a big deal to fuck up. Besides it’s not like women have any metaphorical ball to drop anyway. What man gives a woman control over her finances? Please. That’s laughable.

The answer is that women don’t fix their mistakes because all women think they’re fucking perfect. Perfect like fucking Nicole Kidman in The Stepford Wives or perfect like that finger stab guy in Aliens, whoever you want, women think that’s them. Who the fuck knows why. Some kiss-ass douche bag that they dated for six months too long or their mother probably told them at some point. Who cares. Whatever the reason, when a woman fucks up her whole goddamn life and psycho self-image crumbles around her like a gingerbread house in May. Then comes the waterworks and then the serious life-change and positive attitude which lasts about a fucking hour and a half. And all the while we men have to put on our tool belts (figurative or actually literal tool belts) and get down to some serious un-fucking up.

You know what the problem is. It’s that men are so good at admitting their wrong and women are so fuck terrible at it that they don’t even notice when it actually happens. They’re waiting for the crying and the screaming and the ten minutes of secret eye-rolling.

The fact of it is though, that men are so smooth at admitting they’re wrong, sometimes no one even notices at all. And really, isn’t that exactly how its supposed to be.

Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

72 Comments in 72 threads.»

Comment by jarbrain
2008-06-08 21:12:20

Mansman said:

woman said:

There used to be segregation in this country and signs that would say “No Blacks” Fortunately some people refused to accept this and forced change.

They are your tests your rules and are noted. I don’t agree with you and will agree to differ so as to end this conversation.

I note you are an American Feminazi. This goes a long way towards explaining your intractable attitude. I’ll make appropriate reference to the deficiency whilst your uninvited presence persists.

As expected, you demonstrate rampant contempt for the rules of this establishment, “no women allowed”. What part don’t you understand? Perhaps you are so arrogant that you think Rules don’t apply to you?

This is not about Black people’s rights, it’s about you refusing to abide by the rules of this establishment…like disobeying Road Rules. Try telling the Police you don’t believe in “No Speeding” signs, and see how far it gets you; that’s the concept. Having a limited womanly brain is no excuse for stupidness.

Nevertheless as I have indicated, it will now be necessary to remind everyone that you are an intruder each time you post…at my convenience of course. Don’t be disappointed if I miss a few, I’ll be there for you most of the time because this is clearly what you want.

In a civilized society, your womanly arrogance would be rewarded with a backhand across the face to assist you with your obvious learning difficulty. This efficient behavior modification technique has been available for use on loudmouth females throughout History, except in more recent times of Feminazi insurrection. It works particularly well as a disciplinary measure in cases of intractable arrogance or haughtiness; the outspoken female quickly learns her place with the realization that she is inferior to the Male, and must act accordingly.

“Woman” has verified her contempt for the rules here, and confirmed that she has an undisclosed agenda which is at odds with her lie that she is “genuinly (sic) interested in what he (Wolfe) has to say in response to my post” (and therefore could simply visit Wolfe’s musings…instead of trespassing here).

“Woman” has demonstrated that the words she speaks cannot be regarded as Truth, and that she is prepared to act dishonestly in order to further her Feminazi agenda. She is a shining example of the deception and deceit to be expected from an unprincipled female. It’s a big Red flag to watch out for.

“Woman” is a Liar, and I’ve proved it conclusively with evidence. It’s no wonder she wants to “agree to differ so as to end this conversation”. As usual, women’s tangled bullshit can’t survive a simple logic test, and “Woman” is running away from the truth.

Accordingly, everything “Woman” posts from now on should be considered lying trash…because she IS a liar.

“back hand across the face” Used to be this thinking was considered Biblical, along the lines of “spare the rod and spoil the child”. No more than twenty years ago, you were considered ’soft’ if you weren’t knocking your wife around and tossing your kids around. Is it a man’s fault that women and children ’squirrel away’ hatred and disrespect when they push us beyond ape shit? Afterall, the ‘the mantle of authority’ is not something we asked for; it is God Ordained.

 
Comment by Dr.Howard
2008-05-25 18:39:41

” Men cant admit their wrong ”

I was wrong this morning. There , Just disproved that quote. Guess what ? i’ll move on in life. i wont dwell and cry for weeks about it. I’ll move on.

Men > women

 
Comment by Karu
2008-04-12 08:54:26

KL said:

BIGGEST LIE OF THE CENTURY. ” MEN ADMITTING THEYRE WRONG”—-TRUTH IS - MEN CANT ADMIT THEYRE WRONG!!!!!!

It’s been months and you still haven’t admitted the fallacy of your comment. Me? I was wrong once. I accepted it, admitted it, and fixed my error within the hour.

Also, caps lock is cruise control for cool.

 
Comment by KL
2008-01-26 11:20:00

BIGGEST LIE OF THE CENTURY. ” MEN ADMITTING THEYRE WRONG”—-TRUTH IS - MEN CANT ADMIT THEYRE WRONG!!!!!!

 
Comment by Dutch269
2007-10-25 15:29:22

Yes they do Mansman, that is one of most powerfull tactics these creatures use, MANipulation.

They forget what the discussion is about after the first few sentences, all they can do is try and get you worked up emotionally. Then, they begin to feed off your responces, like leeches.

If you respond to thier rants, they begin to break you down with insults and propaganda they learned from thier skank mothers, or from websites like NOW. Actually trying to convince you, there is something wrong with you, just for pointing out thier faults… females hate that!

Men are emotionally centered, we are in control, that is where they strike.

 
Comment by sonyad
2007-10-25 15:03:12

Use the ‘quote’ button for pete’s sake.

- Chemical Brothers - Funk soul brother

 
Comment by woman
2007-10-25 11:50:55

DOUBT SAYS
“You and your association with a cause which resorts to small penis jokes, anti-male homophobia, and victim feminism - this isn’t the place for it.”

NO Doubt, I Have never made said jokes or anti male homophobia.

“‘men are selfish hogs”

Again Doubt your words I can’t agree with that.

 
Comment by Doubt
2007-10-24 22:15:34

woman said:I would call anyone replying to me politely as an exchange.

But the most polite thing you could do right now would be to leave. You and your association with a cause which resorts to small penis jokes, anti-male homophobia, and victim feminism - this isn’t the place for it.
Even if you were to make a post that you think is the greatest piece of womyn literature after those 2 minutes of typing, it would be blemished by the numerous stupid cunts and male impersonators who frequent this site in search from the attention that daddy never could give them.
http://feministing.org is a popular feminist site - give it a try. I’m sure you will get a big round of ‘u go gurlie’ and ‘men are selfish hogs but we aren’t men but rather little girls who exploit their sexuality for attention so our character should have…uh, brain hurt, too much thinkie. Try wash face, see self in mirror, now eye hurt!’
(Proofreading does not touch you at night.)

 
Comment by woman
2007-10-24 21:29:29

son of the suns said:

I’m sorry cunt, you’re such a worthless bitch I have no response.

That is what I am referring to abbadon.

 
Comment by woman
2007-10-24 21:11:19

abaddon_fff said:

When have I done so?

-Strength and Honor?

not you I was repeating the original question

 
Comment by son of the suns
2007-10-24 19:21:30

I’m sorry cunt, you’re such a worthless bitch I have no response.

 
Comment by abaddon_fff
2007-10-24 17:56:04

When have I done so?

-Strength and Honor?

 
Comment by woman
2007-10-24 17:44:30

Well some Luka sometimes and Mike, not an exchange with you but you posted something I totally agreed with and said so. I would call anyone replying to me politely as an exchange.

Also you answered my question with a question! classic evasive behaviour shall i ask it again

“I have had some very interesting exchanges with men and women on this site. For some reason you and a few others can only resort to abuse with words like cunt and bitch and that is more credible how exactly?”

 
Comment by abaddon_fff
2007-10-24 00:32:13

I have had some very interesting exchanges with men and women on this site. For some reason you and a few others can only resort to abuse with words like cunt and bitch and that is more credible how exaclty?

I have noticed that many of your responses are without worth in the literal sense. What exchanges are you talking about woman?

-Strength and Honor-

 
Comment by mike5150
2007-10-24 00:17:35

So you would prefer to post uncontested? You just say what you want and thats the end of it.

 
Comment by woman
2007-10-23 22:15:04

“2nd person plural”, “1st person”, “all about you”…what relevance does that babbling horseshit have to do with being proven a liar? Notice how she NEVER DENIED IT.”

Sorry Mansman I thought you would get that. Let me explain more slowly

originally I said if ” you stopped responding to all our posts we wouldn’t keep on posting and that would be the end of it.”

You 2nd person plural means all of you who post to this site. Seeing as I am having conversations with some of you (2nd person plural) I continued to post, which does not make me a liar.

“This lying cunt is exactly the reason why sites like this exist. It’s interesting to observe how she tries to squirm out of her lies by belching forth more bullshit. If she keeps this up, her credibility will decline into the absolutely pathetic.”

I have had some very interesting exchanges with men and women on this site. For some reason you and a few others can only resort to abuse with words like cunt and bitch and that is more credible how exaclty?

 
Comment by Mansman
2007-10-23 06:06:47

Observe how this Woman avoids the actual point, namely that she has been PROVED to be a liar. Her credibility is zero. No amount of bullshitting by her can change the fact.

“2nd person plural”, “1st person”, “all about you”…what relevance does that babbling horseshit have to do with being proven a liar? Notice how she NEVER DENIED IT.

This lying cunt is exactly the reason why sites like this exist. It’s interesting to observe how she tries to squirm out of her lies by belching forth more bullshit. If she keeps this up, her credibility will decline into the absolutely pathetic.

 
Comment by woman
2007-10-17 14:34:38

Not 1st, as it is not all about you!

 
Comment by woman
2007-10-17 14:33:19

Mansman said:

Woman hasn’t learned. Here’s her reminder that she’s a liar.

woman said:

October 17th, 2007 at 6:31 am:
or as i have said in other posts if you stopped responding to all our posts we wouldn’t keep on posting and that would be the end of it.

Woman has been truth tested on these words, and proved a liar.
She continues to trespass here. Accordingly, everything “Woman” posts from now on should be considered lying trash.

‘You’ is 2nd person plural

 
Comment by woman
2007-10-17 14:31:44

Mansman said:

Woman hasn’t learned. Here’s her reminder that she’s a liar.

woman said:

October 17th, 2007 at 6:31 am:
or as i have said in other posts if you stopped responding to all our posts we wouldn’t keep on posting and that would be the end of it.

Woman has been truth tested on these words, and proved a liar.
She continues to trespass here. Accordingly, everything “Woman” posts from now on should be considered lying trash.

You is 2nd person plural

 
Comment by woman
2007-10-17 14:30:00

Detached said:

Mansman: I prefer she be allowed to post so I can get a good belly laugh at her antics. Its just so amusing.

Thank You Detached I am glad to hear I made someone laugh. Its good for the Soul and very healing, as it releases endorphins.

 
Comment by Detached
2007-10-17 12:39:12

Mansman: I prefer she be allowed to post so I can get a good belly laugh at her antics. Its just so amusing.

 
Comment by Mansman
2007-10-17 10:44:33

Woman hasn’t learned. Here’s her reminder that she’s a liar.

woman said:

October 17th, 2007 at 6:31 am:
or as i have said in other posts if you stopped responding to all our posts we wouldn’t keep on posting and that would be the end of it.

Woman has been truth tested on these words, and proved a liar.
She continues to trespass here. Accordingly, everything “Woman” posts from now on should be considered lying trash.

 
Comment by Mansman
2007-10-17 10:39:44

woman said:

hang on will go google American Feminazi do you have to be american to be one?

Listen to Mansvoice and stop being pedantic. Unless you’re completely retarded, you know exactly what the terminology infers.

 
Comment by woman
2007-10-17 09:46:22

hang on will go google American Feminazi do you have to be american to be one?

 
Comment by MansVoice
2007-10-17 09:27:25

Mansman said:This is not about Black people’s rights, it’s about you refusing to abide by the rules of this establishment…like disobeying Road Rules. Try telling the Police you don’t believe in “No Speeding” signs, and see how far it gets you; that’s the concept. Having a limited womanly brain is no excuse for stupidness.

Fully agreed upon. If you dont like the way the game is being played here, leave. We never asked for a “discussion” or a “talk”. This is manly talk. Handle the comments or leave. We do not conform to what YOU wish to hear. Keep in mind that YOU are the guest and should do as all guests do - respect the host’s rules.

 
Comment by Mansman
2007-10-17 09:19:28

woman said:

There used to be segregation in this country and signs that would say “No Blacks” Fortunately some people refused to accept this and forced change.

They are your tests your rules and are noted. I don’t agree with you and will agree to differ so as to end this conversation.

I note you are an American Feminazi. This goes a long way towards explaining your intractable attitude. I’ll make appropriate reference to the deficiency whilst your uninvited presence persists.

As expected, you demonstrate rampant contempt for the rules of this establishment, “no women allowed”. What part don’t you understand? Perhaps you are so arrogant that you think Rules don’t apply to you?

This is not about Black people’s rights, it’s about you refusing to abide by the rules of this establishment…like disobeying Road Rules. Try telling the Police you don’t believe in “No Speeding” signs, and see how far it gets you; that’s the concept. Having a limited womanly brain is no excuse for stupidness.

Nevertheless as I have indicated, it will now be necessary to remind everyone that you are an intruder each time you post…at my convenience of course. Don’t be disappointed if I miss a few, I’ll be there for you most of the time because this is clearly what you want.

In a civilized society, your womanly arrogance would be rewarded with a backhand across the face to assist you with your obvious learning difficulty. This efficient behavior modification technique has been available for use on loudmouth females throughout History, except in more recent times of Feminazi insurrection. It works particularly well as a disciplinary measure in cases of intractable arrogance or haughtiness; the outspoken female quickly learns her place with the realization that she is inferior to the Male, and must act accordingly.

“Woman” has verified her contempt for the rules here, and confirmed that she has an undisclosed agenda which is at odds with her lie that she is “genuinly (sic) interested in what he (Wolfe) has to say in response to my post” (and therefore could simply visit Wolfe’s musings…instead of trespassing here).

“Woman” has demonstrated that the words she speaks cannot be regarded as Truth, and that she is prepared to act dishonestly in order to further her Feminazi agenda. She is a shining example of the deception and deceit to be expected from an unprincipled female. It’s a big Red flag to watch out for.

“Woman” is a Liar, and I’ve proved it conclusively with evidence. It’s no wonder she wants to “agree to differ so as to end this conversation”. As usual, women’s tangled bullshit can’t survive a simple logic test, and “Woman” is running away from the truth.

Accordingly, everything “Woman” posts from now on should be considered lying trash…because she IS a liar.

 
Comment by woman
2007-10-17 06:31:57

I notice that the issue with women taking men’s jobs and the above statement come up quite a lot. Could you elaborate?

 
Comment by mike5150
2007-10-16 23:54:47

Good point woman. Now that sign reads “Not Hiring Men”, for government employment.

 
Comment by woman
2007-10-16 20:20:36

There used to be segregation in this country and signs that would say “No Blacks” Fortunately some people refused to accept this and forced change.

They are your tests your rules and are noted. I don’t agree with you and will agree to differ so as to end this conversation.

 
Comment by Mansman
2007-10-16 19:26:09

If you feel you must accept Wolfe’s offer to respond to you, then go to Wolfe’s musings. He’ll likely agree this is best in all the circumstances.

Your excuse for remaining here, such as it is…is flawed. Here’s why; While Wolfe maintains his readily available alternative site where you may communicate with him at your leisure, there is no reason for you to REMAIN here, regardless of any contrivance you concoct. The logic is simple and clear.

For you, it’s a matter of credibility…or rather, whether your words demonstrate you have any. As we watch what you DO, we are cognisant of any undisclosed agenda you may HAVE…which betrays the words that you SAY, namely,

woman said:

I was having a conversation with Wolfe and I am genuinly interested in what he has to say in response to my post. He offered to respond and I accepted.

So with Wolfe’s alternative site available, and the “no women allowed” sign prominently displayed HERE, think of leaving HERE as a truth detector. Think of staying…as your admission of an agenda other than that which you have stated. Any future presence by you here would then be forever tainted by a shadow of insincerity, which I will no doubt be inclined to remind everyone about when necessary.

The rules of other people’s houses are there for a reason. In their own houses, other people are appropriately conferred the right to have visitors respect those rules. DISrespect of the rules demonstrates contempt…perhaps the undisclosed agenda I’ve referred to?

The sign HERE does indeed say “No Women Allowed”. In terms of my truth test, integrity test, hidden agenda test, or whatever it may be conveniently known by…your actions will betray any insincerity that your WORDS try to conceal.

 
Comment by woman
2007-10-16 08:33:30

I was having a conversation with Wolfe and I am genuinly interested in what he has to say in response to my post. He offered to respond and I accepted.

If you feel you must ask him not to respond to me after all then do so.

 
Comment by MansVoice
2007-10-16 08:18:52

Mansman said:
Of course, any onus of proof that an individual is “not like that” rests with the individual making the claim. My observation is that this is not a responsibility which is well fulfilled by the females on this site, and no amount of protest by them is valid while they shirk this responsibility.

Amazingly, they seem oblivious to rational conclusion and appear to have some type of inferiority complex, which in itself would be an interesting subject for study. In simple terms, the answer to your question is that the responses of females are important in terms of study, but can be intellectually tiresome due to the factors mentioned.

You’ll no doubt observe corroboration of that as they respond to this post.

Excellent post. Watch and learn, Woman.

 
Comment by sonyad
2007-10-16 08:11:44

9 out of 10 for artistic impression with the feigned righteous indignation.

Wolfe said:

I shall continue to treat you with more deference than perhaps you deserve, for that is my nature.

-wolfe.

The converse has always held true.

You’re as faux as any inferred virtue of your morally mostly irredeemable ideology.

Because I still think too much of you to believe you’re genuine in most of your stated political, and otherwise, convictions.

- evil sony

- Kleerup feat Robyn - With Every Heartbeat (Pete Tong & Dave Spoon Remix)

 
Comment by Mansman
2007-10-16 02:04:39

woman said:

All you have to do marksman is lock the door! I am sure with all the male super brains on this site it coouldn’t be that hard to block my posts.

So is it the case in fact that you refuse to take responsibility for your own actions, and the absence of policing here is the sole excuse you rely upon to justify your behaviour?

or as i have said in other posts if you stopped responding to all our posts we wouldn’t keep on posting and that would be the end of it.

It’s curious that you put forward this particular coverall disclaimer. I do question whether it is genuine, but as always one usually discovers the credibility or otherwise of a person by watching what they DO, rather than what they SAY. Perhaps we can evaluate your credibility on this basis.

I do agree with the outcome you propose, but simply suggest an alternative order. The criteria are identical.

1. You stop posting
2. Men here will agree to stop responding to those posts

-it will be but a few days until your most recent posting will be a distant memory, and your proposal that there be no responses to your posts will become reality. This is indeed what you have indicated to be your desire, and in the absence of some undisclosed agenda I suggest that this solution produces an outcome which satisfies that desire. Is my logic to be faulted in any way by having reached that conclusion?

why do you respond if you are not interested in anything we say?

The application of thought to solving problems, paradoxes and other curiosities in life includes as a matter of necessity, the need to obtain sufficient evidence with which to draw valid conclusions. For example, if one were to observe a consistent tendency in female posters…to be aggressive, haughty, illogical, abusive, irrational or simply bitter…and this trend was statistically significant, one might be justified in forming a hypothesis that such behaviors were in general terms, representative of the female population as a group. This is not to say that exceptions wouldn’t exist, just that the group or individual members, might be expected to demonstrate the behavior concluded by statistical analysis.

Of course, any onus of proof that an individual is “not like that” rests with the individual making the claim. My observation is that this is not a responsibility which is well fulfilled by the females on this site, and no amount of protest by them is valid while they shirk this responsibility.

Amazingly, they seem oblivious to rational conclusion and appear to have some type of inferiority complex, which in itself would be an interesting subject for study. In simple terms, the answer to your question is that the responses of females are important in terms of study, but can be intellectually tiresome due to the factors mentioned.

You’ll no doubt observe corroboration of that as they respond to this post.

 
Comment by woman
2007-10-15 23:48:12

Mansman said:

Its certainly interesting to “hear” the opinions of Wolfe. That is ALL you should be doing.

There is a sign at the front door of the site that says “no women allowed”. How is it that you are so presumptuous and assume this sign does NOT apply to you? Are you exempt from other people’s rules in other peoples houses? Would you condone your children’s friends coming into your house and flagrantly ignoring your standards for acceptable behavior…in YOUR house? I genuinely doubt it. So why are you doing that HERE? ”

All you have to do marksman is lock the door! I am sure with all the male super brains on this site it coouldn’t be that hard to block my posts.

or as i have said in other posts if you stopped responding to all our posts we wouldn’t keep on posting and that would be the end of it.

why do you respond if you are not interested in anything we say?

 
Comment by Mansman
2007-10-15 17:39:17

Its certainly interesting to “hear” the opinions of Wolfe. That is ALL you should be doing.

There is a sign at the front door of the site that says “no women allowed”. How is it that you are so presumptuous and assume this sign does NOT apply to you? Are you exempt from other people’s rules in other peoples houses? Would you condone your children’s friends coming into your house and flagrantly ignoring your standards for acceptable behavior…in YOUR house? I genuinely doubt it. So why are you doing that HERE?

You say that you will “promise to respond sincerely”. How can you possibly expect to be taken as sincere, when you clearly demonstrate contempt for other people’s rules in other peoples houses? You are a hypocrite.

Read then heed, the rules. You pretend to be civil with your thin veneer of feigned interest, but in actuality you are a thug. Stop breaking into my home uninvited, would describe it adequately.

 
Comment by woman
2007-10-15 15:26:10

I promise to respond sincerely, not always to agree however. Would be very interested to hear any of your comments.

 
Comment by Wolfe
2007-10-15 15:23:18

Savant said:
You must understand that your views are archaic, and useless. Your view is unfavorable to the collective. Self-esteem encourages thinking and smart choices. Smart choices do not sell. You will be assimilated into American culture. Resistance is futile.

@Savant I get your drift. It’s a cool riff. I agree with much of what you say. I agree my views are archaic; I don’t agree that they are useless.

William F. Buckley stood athwart America and cried “STOP!”. Ronald Reagan got elected. Cool beans.

-wolfe

 
Comment by Wolfe
2007-10-15 15:21:05

@woman thanks for granting me the presumption of being real. I think. At least you beat Sony.

You’ve responded intelligently with an impressive laundry list of quotes (no that isn’t a snide attack on women who should do laundry. Indeed, as a man I’m happy to do laundry. It’s ironing that I hate, though I love irony.)

If you will really respond sincerely to my comments, then say so. And I shall respond to that entire list.

I disagree with much of it; I agree with some of it.

Regards,
-wolfe

 
Comment by Wolfe
2007-10-15 15:17:49

@woman I’ll have a response for you below.
This is to Sony.

@Sony:

sonyad said: [speaking of wolfe]

As opposed to phony human beings, such as your self [sic].

That’s pretty sad, Sony. The insult is significant. You assert that I’m not human, because of my political beliefs. By contrast, I acknowledge you are human, but I certainly can’t commend you.

I’ve never treated you the way you’ve just treated me. Precisely because I value your views, your opinion hurts. Don’t mistake me. It doesn’t hurt much — because I’m a man. I shrug, and I move on. But I think it will give you a perverse pleasure to know that I read what you said and was affected by it. And moved you from the column of !?! to ‘evil’.

Sad because you’re not stupid, and I’d have enjoyed being friends. But you’ve decisively moved yourself well beyond that column.

So be it. You are what you are. Irrational, and, I think, evil. Certainly a nasty piece of work to deny the very humanity in those you disagree with. You’ve made the choices you’ve made, and you’ve chosen to attack me. I shan’t dignify you with much of a response other than this.

I shall continue to treat you with more deference than perhaps you deserve, for that is my nature.

-wolfe.

 
Comment by woman
2007-10-15 14:21:29

However points are better than generalisations. Don’t agree with Wolfe’s but not sure if he phony think he is very real actually.

 
Comment by woman
2007-10-15 14:18:53

oops sorry sonyad wrong post my bad

 
Comment by woman
2007-10-15 14:15:28

Sonyad its easy just to throw insults around without making a point, do you have one?

 
Comment by sonyad
2007-10-15 13:39:34

Wolfe said:
Unguided by fathers, boys will tend to become thugs (also known in the US as Democrats)

As opposed to phony human beings, such as your self.

- Rolling Stones - (I Can’t Get No) Satisfaction

 
Comment by woman
2007-10-15 13:34:01

” to mass-produced displays of musical-ineptness”

Great quote!

 
Comment by Savant
2007-10-15 13:20:47

Wolfe said:

Of course it’s a Dad’s duty to teach his daughter how not to be a whore. That’s probably one of the central duties of a father to a daughter.

He needs to love her, and ensure that she has adequate levels of self-esteem. He also needs to ensure that she isn’t spoiled. It’s a tough line to traverse.

Well Mr. Wolfe… it looks damn good on paper. Allow me to put on my Borg voice for a second:

Western culture will methodically rape today’s youth into what it sees fit. Your view will not buy our drugs, watch our programs, or allow us the freedom to do whatever we want, without fear of retribution.
Your view will not encourage rampant purchasing. Our view will not only sell everything from uber-expensive vehicles, to mass-produced displays of musical-ineptness, to salad shooters… whilst subsequently drugging our nations people into a lemming-like state.

You must understand that your views are archaic, and useless. Your view is unfavorable to the collective. Self-esteem encourages thinking and smart choices. Smart choices do not sell. You will be assimilated into American culture. Resistance is futile.

 
Comment by woman
2007-10-15 10:19:50

no

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2007-10-15 10:11:39

That must have taken a lot of work.

-Dick

 
Comment by woman
2007-10-15 08:51:46

Not my language or views wolfe the veiws of this site and yes i actually agree with you. I am dismayed too. Obviously you don’t think all women are like this or you wouldn’t have jumped so quickly to defend them good for you I was just showing how these postings could look from a different perspective.

Here are just a few of the beliefs and “crude language” of the site you support , would you show this to your daughters?

All women are cheaters./ Not even guilt will stop women from being the cheating harlots that they are./ Like any virus, women are not content with ruining their own lives. Ultimately, they seek out the lives of decent, honest men and tempt and corrupt them until they appear to be cheaters as well when nothing could be further from the truth. Cheating is like getting pregnant. It’s 100% a woman’s fault 100% of the time. = Dick

Their is no womens success. Unless you include the advent of the handjob + mike

See how she tries to shame you with sex, that’s all women care about + Dutch

Run along, sweet-tits. No one will listen to what you say if you don’t put out because it just isn’t worth listening to. You are common, dull, and boring. You do have an entire crowd of sluts to share it with= Doubt

Women hate sex simply because they are lousy at it= Dick

No need. There’s waves of airheaded whores everywhere with nothing better to do than gab about their fantasy’s of being attractive to Men. Mansman

Like I said, we call you a WHORE because you are BEING one, fishing for attention like the SLUT that you are. You can CHOOSE not to feel hurt. I personally dont care. I will call you as it is because thats what you are.= mansman

Now fuck off, you stupid little cunt. You don’t know shit, you’re just a slut who uses sex to manipulate the stronger, better men. Really, fuck off. = Doubt

Women just kind of lie around like big fat pigs in big fat puddles of shit. Congratulations women. You really earned those rights!= dick

Marriage is 100% the fault of women. It was invented by men though! Did you know that? Marriage was invented because women were too busy whoring it out to fuck the only the guy who was paying their rent and feeding their fat asses French bon-bons every day = Dick

Of course, just like any other time a woman opens her mouth, she doesn’t have any fucking clue what she’s talking about.= Dick

HAHAHAHAHA. You trying to be funny, little bitch? Suck it up… or suck me up… bitch. = mansman

You know what would shut you up for good? My cock in your mouth! = doubt
Tell the whore to fuck off! Stupid horseshit opinions are not wanted here.
Are you getting the idea, whore? = mansman

t’s surprisingly easy to train women. As long as you can ignore anything that comes out of their mouths.
-Dick

 
Comment by Wolfe
2007-10-15 05:58:13

woman said:
Can’t imagine how a little girl would feel to know her daddy thinks her and all her gender are cunts. and bitches. Thats Horrible

@woman I’m dismayed by your crude language and evident negative view of your sex.

Of course it’s a Dad’s duty to teach his daughter how not to be a whore. That’s probably one of the central duties of a father to a daughter.

He needs to love her, and ensure that she has adequate levels of self-esteem. He also needs to ensure that she isn’t spoiled. It’s a tough line to traverse.

Unguided by fathers, boys will tend to become thugs (also known in the US as Democrats) and women will tend to become whores. This is simple statistical fact.

The tendency can be combated by women, certainly.

-wolfe

 
Comment by MansVoice
2007-10-14 22:07:02

This article is god damn true. Women almost never apologise especially to their family members.

 
Comment by woman
2007-10-14 21:28:37

dick to quote you

“We can accelerate in academia for one, we can also become top businessmen in sharp looking suits, or we can simply be good parents”

How could you call yourself or any man on this site a good parent if you have daughters?

Either you tell them the truth which is they are whores, cunts, stupid and so is their mother and that men will just want to fuck them and never respect them.

Or you can lie and not tell them how you really feel

Either way how is that good parenting? Can’t imagine how a little girl would feel to know her daddy thinks her and all her gender are cunts. and bitches. Thats Horrible

 
Comment by Heinrich_Himmler
2007-05-27 01:36:49

“One of my ex’s Amanda would always say how everything was my fault. I worked full time, while i supported the roof over her head some of her clothes, and the food she ate. She said i didnt make enough time for her. I eventually dumped her because”

Amanda. Ah, Amanda. The 5 minutes of sheer bliss. I spent 12 years with “Miss.American.impossible.Cunt.” You did absolutely the right thing by dumping Ms. completely-utterly- impossible. Forget her and dont look back.

 
Comment by Heinrich_Himmler
2007-05-27 01:31:09

BTW Mr Dick, what do you think of my post? (Bows before him) If you tell me to get of your site - i wouldn’t like that much.
Love, Heinrich

 
Comment by Heinrich_Himmler
2007-05-27 01:12:49

Women almost never say “i was wrong”. They just change their minds. If it wasn’t for women, there wouldn’t be people! But considering most of the people i meet, it would be like the closing of Jurasic park.
Women cant do anything significant except paperwork, clean up shit, cook, and have more people. If you want to drive a car, use a computer, or ride a ship or plane. guess what, it was built by men. I couldn’t give a shit if we have more people. I saw “Children of Men”. It was boring. Unless a person can amuse me, pay me, or fuck me, i couldnt give a Hell if they existed or not.

Touche’ you say? Guess what, im a man, and if i dont come to work, here is what happens: your car doesnt work. Your computer, furnace, electricity, phone, none of any of that shit will work. Name whatever you want, beeyatch, guess who brought it to you. If, beloved female, you think you can do it better, please do it!!! fill out the form and wait for the phone call. You’re welcome to it. I’ve had my share of hauling buckets of bolts and 100 lbs of welding lead up a hill in 110 degrees to fix some shit, complete with a surly fellow crew of assholes.

Face it, men do all the shit work and wait around hoping to get laid. If men aren’t happy, YOU arent happy. Personally i’m a half step away from the uni bomber lifestyle just as soon as decent wireless internet becomes available. I have a truck, and a camper shell, it grows more tempting every damn day.

 
Comment by MACHO-MAN
2007-03-01 23:30:45

alone*

 
Comment by MACHO-MAN
2007-03-01 23:29:07

Female said:

For god sake, women do say these words when their warranted. Clearly, you’re just always in the wrong. And can’t see it either. I’m sorry if this offends you. Easy.

That is typical for a woman to say a man is wrong EVERY time. She is just hiding behind the fact that women blame men for everything and never stop blaming. One of my ex’s Amanda would always say how everything was my fault. I worked full time, while i supported the roof over her head some of her clothes, and the food she ate. She said i didnt make enough time for her. I eventually dumped her because she wasnt going to leave me she was just going to bitch about how i wasnt perfect. And if i was perfect she would have said i was bisexual thinking i had some traits of a woman. I realized that nomatter how hard i worked nomatter how many times i bought her flowers because i didnt do something right that she couldnt manage to comunicate to me i was wrong. I guess if theres not a woman thats that way ill live a life along with my money and my adventures.

 
Comment by Em
2006-04-06 04:59:50

This is one article I l can agree with. I do admire the way men tend to admit their mistakes and fix it, no hassles. It is true us women like to bitch about our problems, and it can be to the point of inaction. I don’t know why women act like that, but they do. Perhaps it is just another way of handling our problems? Heck, I don’t know!

Good observation in general.

-Emm

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2005-11-04 08:47:14

“so true”, that’s a brilliant point. As I was reading it I was going to respond with “women do say ‘I’m sorry’, however, it is always followed by an ‘if’ thus rendering it completely worthless.”

Imagine my surprise when I read the following from, Female.

“I’m sorry if this offends you.”

That’s a non-apology. That’s a non-apology and it’s the only kind of apology that a woman can make. Women can’t grasp the notion of humility or remorse. They’re truly a vile lot and Female has yet again proven just how low women will sink to destroy a human spirit. That’s all they can do.

You’re absolutely spot on on everything. Thanks for posting.

-Dick

 
Comment by Christian J
2005-11-04 05:03:57

“l sincerely hope l dont go to me grave before l hear a woman utter the intolerable reality of existing in a man’s world, namely… l am sorry, l was wrong, l accept RESPONSIBILIY.”

They really are incapable of confessing it. They have been taught, no screeched at for so long by the feminasties that they are “perfect” and “victims” that is is impossible for them to be incorrect.

Rest in Peace, brother.

 
Comment by Female
2005-11-04 04:23:47

For god sake, women do say these words when their warranted. Clearly, you’re just always in the wrong. And can’t see it either. I’m sorry if this offends you. Easy.

 
Comment by so true
2005-11-04 02:17:59

A bit bluntly stated, but hey 1000 man point for speaking the unvarnished awful truth. All you ever need to know you are correct in your characterisations of women is that they get defensive then offensive. You know… touching a raw nerve causes shreiks of protestation.

l think l will prolly go to me grave never ever hearing a female utter the words “l am wrong” or “l am sorry.”

Which really is a bit sad. Do women have any understanding of the power of those words. The act of taking responsibility totally deflects any other attacks. When you say “sorry” or “l am wrong” or “you are right” that is the swift and decisive END of the matter. For now we can MOVE ON to the SOLUTIONS and IMPROVE the situation. Rather than wallowing into perpetuity. No need to speak 100k self validfating rhetorical rationalisations which only make you feeling a bit half arsed and breeds resentment in the other party, when a few words will wrap the thing up to EVERYBODY’S satisfaction.

Sometimes l wounder if women actually want resolution, solution, satisfaction. Sometimes l think that they just want perpetual complaint as a way of feelling better about the oh so deliterious injustice of being born female in a man’s world.

You want to make it your world… you gotta take responsibility. Until you do you can only ever live in the shadows. These sort of comments upset the weak willed and feeble minded and frankly, excepting a Phillipino dump scavenging 5 yr old girl, l dont really care. The incredibly well off westerners who complain about the oppressive existence of wanton consumption, aspirational living and navel gazing self absorption generate no empathy in my mind.

l have noithing but the utmost admiration for women who just puyt there heads down and get it done. The women who camplain that its a man’s world yet would find living in a man’s world for more than 5 minutes to be completely intolerable are the one’s who dont deserve our time nor attention.

l sincerely hope l dont go to me grave before l hear a woman utter the intolerable reality of existing in a man’s world, namely… l am sorry, l was wrong, l accept RESPONSIBILIY.

 
Comment by a girl
2005-11-03 19:22:22

If you ignored the females what would you have left to talk about? You wouldnt get to bitch or say ‘blow job’ nearly half as much.

 
Comment by Christian J
2005-11-03 04:49:21

CB
“It’s occasionally referred to as the “Borg collective?.

The man is making millions by pandering to the permanently perplexed.

He should recommend blow-jobs as a form of psychic mental therapy.”

 
Comment by Nicole
2005-09-26 12:23:20

You would do well to follow your own examples jason.

 
Comment by jason
2005-09-13 16:55:18

I have a suggestion: Instead of replying to ANY of the females in here, we just ignore them. God, that pisses them off! Seriously, that pisses them off!

 
Comment by Esther
2005-09-12 16:12:28

Once again Mr. Masterson, you have hit the nail squarely upon the head. I think this inability of the lesser gender stems from another shortcoming: their steadfast refusal to “deal with it”, where “it” refers to any situation where things don’t go exactly to their specific liking. Men have respect for other people (even most women, though it is largely unwarranted) and to that end we take immediate and unwavering responsibility for any action that results in a negative outcome. This is a form of dealing with the proverbial “it”. We recognize that we made a mistake somewhere along the line and we do what we can to minimize the fallout from said mistake. This can also be referred to as accountability, something women know squat about.

 
Comment by CB
2005-09-10 18:11:20

Filthy rich moronic genius? I can do nothing but tip my glass to a man who takes cliches and metaphors that are so hackneyed even 5 year old boys call bullshit on them, and dress them up with psychobabble horseshit, then shovel them by the truckload into the vacuous gaping maws of the female “mind”. The term “female mind” has also been used as an allegory in modern science fiction.

It’s occasionally referred to as the “Borg collective”. The man is making millions by pandering to the permanently perplexed. He should recommend blow-jobs as a form of psychic mental therapy.

 
Comment by Patriarchal Oppressor
2005-09-10 15:57:44

Dick, you have an excellent point. You can count on a man to come up with a brilliant, yet subtle way to profit from wymyn’s eternal oppression.

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2005-09-10 11:49:38

Moron or filthy rich genius?

He’s a man after all, surely he knows from a lifetime of experience that women’s problems are all molehills and princess complexes.

You’re too right about everything else.

-dick

 
Comment by CB
2005-09-10 04:45:54

Talking to women and getting them to understand large, deeply meaningful concepts like ‘Just tell them the truth’ or ‘Why don’t you fix it instead of bitch