The Second Step is Admitting It
Unlike women, men can be a whole shit load of things over the course of their lives — and all without relying on government quotas or miniskirts. To men that’s an important difference.
We can accelerate in academia for one, we can also become top businessmen in sharp looking suits, or we can simply be good parents. That’s our prerogative as men: whatever we want and however we want to do it.
However, while exercising so much responsibility, we men, from time to time, can also be wrong.
Not in the way that women are wrong, of course. The way a man can be wrong is like placing the fork and knife on the wrong side of the plate. Who cares, everyone still eats. The way that women are usually wrong is by throwing the flatware in the pool, burning dinner, and then playing the period card like its Uno.
Uno! Great. As if women have ever had more than one card.
It’s a widely bullshit myth that men can’t admit they’re wrong. Men admit they’re wrong all the time. There’s more than three billion men in the world right now all taking care of business and responsibilities at lighting fast speeds and in a million different directions. With all that man power flying around fucking of course The Noid is eventually going to show up and ruin a pizza or two. There’s nothing wrong with that. The only thing wrong is the bullshit myth.
No, men admit their wrong. And when they do, they’ll make it right and that’ll be the end of it.
See that’s the first way that men are better than women at admitting they’re wrong. To a woman, being wrong is a two out of a three step process — just like everything else in a woman’s life: two out of three. There’s the fuck up, which they make plenty of, from their history degrees to their mixed fucking signals to their prison pen pals; then there’s the admitting it. And that’s where a woman’s journey ends in a maelstrom of tears and snot and attention. Men on the other hand cross that goal line of absolution and fix the mistake. They take care of it, and they clear their permanent record of jackass doings.
So why don’t women go all the way? It’s not a big deal to fuck up. Besides it’s not like women have any metaphorical ball to drop anyway. What man gives a woman control over her finances? Please. That’s laughable.
The answer is that women don’t fix their mistakes because all women think they’re fucking perfect. Perfect like fucking Nicole Kidman in The Stepford Wives or perfect like that finger stab guy in Aliens, whoever you want, women think that’s them. Who the fuck knows why. Some kiss-ass douche bag that they dated for six months too long or their mother probably told them at some point. Who cares. Whatever the reason, when a woman fucks up her whole goddamn life and psycho self-image crumbles around her like a gingerbread house in May. Then comes the waterworks and then the serious life-change and positive attitude which lasts about a fucking hour and a half. And all the while we men have to put on our tool belts (figurative or actually literal tool belts) and get down to some serious un-fucking up.
You know what the problem is. It’s that men are so good at admitting their wrong and women are so fuck terrible at it that they don’t even notice when it actually happens. They’re waiting for the crying and the screaming and the ten minutes of secret eye-rolling.
The fact of it is though, that men are so smooth at admitting they’re wrong, sometimes no one even notices at all. And really, isn’t that exactly how its supposed to be.
Related Articles:
October 15th, 2007 at 3:21 pm - IP Man-Hash: 27bb4a532c17e
@woman thanks for granting me the presumption of being real. I think. At least you beat Sony.
You’ve responded intelligently with an impressive laundry list of quotes (no that isn’t a snide attack on women who should do laundry. Indeed, as a man I’m happy to do laundry. It’s ironing that I hate, though I love irony.)
If you will really respond sincerely to my comments, then say so. And I shall respond to that entire list.
I disagree with much of it; I agree with some of it.
Regards,
-wolfe
October 15th, 2007 at 3:23 pm - IP Man-Hash: 27bb4a532c17e
@Savant I get your drift. It’s a cool riff. I agree with much of what you say. I agree my views are archaic; I don’t agree that they are useless.
William F. Buckley stood athwart America and cried “STOP!”. Ronald Reagan got elected. Cool beans.
-wolfe
October 15th, 2007 at 3:26 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7cff7535f53d1
I promise to respond sincerely, not always to agree however. Would be very interested to hear any of your comments.
October 15th, 2007 at 5:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: b24fa70c8e643
Its certainly interesting to “hear” the opinions of Wolfe. That is ALL you should be doing.
There is a sign at the front door of the site that says “no women allowed”. How is it that you are so presumptuous and assume this sign does NOT apply to you? Are you exempt from other people’s rules in other peoples houses? Would you condone your children’s friends coming into your house and flagrantly ignoring your standards for acceptable behavior…in YOUR house? I genuinely doubt it. So why are you doing that HERE?
You say that you will “promise to respond sincerely”. How can you possibly expect to be taken as sincere, when you clearly demonstrate contempt for other people’s rules in other peoples houses? You are a hypocrite.
Read then heed, the rules. You pretend to be civil with your thin veneer of feigned interest, but in actuality you are a thug. Stop breaking into my home uninvited, would describe it adequately.
October 15th, 2007 at 11:48 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7cff7535f53d1
October 16th, 2007 at 2:04 am - IP Man-Hash: 8bf10ee7e5a18
So is it the case in fact that you refuse to take responsibility for your own actions, and the absence of policing here is the sole excuse you rely upon to justify your behaviour?
It’s curious that you put forward this particular coverall disclaimer. I do question whether it is genuine, but as always one usually discovers the credibility or otherwise of a person by watching what they DO, rather than what they SAY. Perhaps we can evaluate your credibility on this basis.
I do agree with the outcome you propose, but simply suggest an alternative order. The criteria are identical.
1. You stop posting
2. Men here will agree to stop responding to those posts
-it will be but a few days until your most recent posting will be a distant memory, and your proposal that there be no responses to your posts will become reality. This is indeed what you have indicated to be your desire, and in the absence of some undisclosed agenda I suggest that this solution produces an outcome which satisfies that desire. Is my logic to be faulted in any way by having reached that conclusion?
The application of thought to solving problems, paradoxes and other curiosities in life includes as a matter of necessity, the need to obtain sufficient evidence with which to draw valid conclusions. For example, if one were to observe a consistent tendency in female posters…to be aggressive, haughty, illogical, abusive, irrational or simply bitter…and this trend was statistically significant, one might be justified in forming a hypothesis that such behaviors were in general terms, representative of the female population as a group. This is not to say that exceptions wouldn’t exist, just that the group or individual members, might be expected to demonstrate the behavior concluded by statistical analysis.
Of course, any onus of proof that an individual is “not like that” rests with the individual making the claim. My observation is that this is not a responsibility which is well fulfilled by the females on this site, and no amount of protest by them is valid while they shirk this responsibility.
Amazingly, they seem oblivious to rational conclusion and appear to have some type of inferiority complex, which in itself would be an interesting subject for study. In simple terms, the answer to your question is that the responses of females are important in terms of study, but can be intellectually tiresome due to the factors mentioned.
You’ll no doubt observe corroboration of that as they respond to this post.
October 16th, 2007 at 8:11 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
9 out of 10 for artistic impression with the feigned righteous indignation.
The converse has always held true.
You’re as faux as any inferred virtue of your morally mostly irredeemable ideology.
Because I still think too much of you to believe you’re genuine in most of your stated political, and otherwise, convictions.
- evil sony
- Kleerup feat Robyn - With Every Heartbeat (Pete Tong & Dave Spoon Remix)
October 16th, 2007 at 8:18 am - IP Man-Hash: 41f6de747e750
Excellent post. Watch and learn, Woman.
October 16th, 2007 at 8:33 am - IP Man-Hash: 7cff7535f53d1
I was having a conversation with Wolfe and I am genuinly interested in what he has to say in response to my post. He offered to respond and I accepted.
If you feel you must ask him not to respond to me after all then do so.
October 16th, 2007 at 7:26 pm - IP Man-Hash: 8bf10ee7e5a18
If you feel you must accept Wolfe’s offer to respond to you, then go to Wolfe’s musings. He’ll likely agree this is best in all the circumstances.
Your excuse for remaining here, such as it is…is flawed. Here’s why; While Wolfe maintains his readily available alternative site where you may communicate with him at your leisure, there is no reason for you to REMAIN here, regardless of any contrivance you concoct. The logic is simple and clear.
For you, it’s a matter of credibility…or rather, whether your words demonstrate you have any. As we watch what you DO, we are cognisant of any undisclosed agenda you may HAVE…which betrays the words that you SAY, namely,
So with Wolfe’s alternative site available, and the “no women allowed” sign prominently displayed HERE, think of leaving HERE as a truth detector. Think of staying…as your admission of an agenda other than that which you have stated. Any future presence by you here would then be forever tainted by a shadow of insincerity, which I will no doubt be inclined to remind everyone about when necessary.
The rules of other people’s houses are there for a reason. In their own houses, other people are appropriately conferred the right to have visitors respect those rules. DISrespect of the rules demonstrates contempt…perhaps the undisclosed agenda I’ve referred to?
The sign HERE does indeed say “No Women Allowed”. In terms of my truth test, integrity test, hidden agenda test, or whatever it may be conveniently known by…your actions will betray any insincerity that your WORDS try to conceal.
October 16th, 2007 at 8:20 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7cff7535f53d1
There used to be segregation in this country and signs that would say “No Blacks” Fortunately some people refused to accept this and forced change.
They are your tests your rules and are noted. I don’t agree with you and will agree to differ so as to end this conversation.
October 16th, 2007 at 11:54 pm - IP Man-Hash: eeb32e3dc6874
Good point woman. Now that sign reads “Not Hiring Men”, for government employment.
October 17th, 2007 at 6:31 am - IP Man-Hash: 7cff7535f53d1
I notice that the issue with women taking men’s jobs and the above statement come up quite a lot. Could you elaborate?
October 17th, 2007 at 9:19 am - IP Man-Hash: 2385f3847dc8b
I note you are an American Feminazi. This goes a long way towards explaining your intractable attitude. I’ll make appropriate reference to the deficiency whilst your uninvited presence persists.
As expected, you demonstrate rampant contempt for the rules of this establishment, “no women allowed”. What part don’t you understand? Perhaps you are so arrogant that you think Rules don’t apply to you?
This is not about Black people’s rights, it’s about you refusing to abide by the rules of this establishment…like disobeying Road Rules. Try telling the Police you don’t believe in “No Speeding” signs, and see how far it gets you; that’s the concept. Having a limited womanly brain is no excuse for stupidness.
Nevertheless as I have indicated, it will now be necessary to remind everyone that you are an intruder each time you post…at my convenience of course. Don’t be disappointed if I miss a few, I’ll be there for you most of the time because this is clearly what you want.
In a civilized society, your womanly arrogance would be rewarded with a backhand across the face to assist you with your obvious learning difficulty. This efficient behavior modification technique has been available for use on loudmouth females throughout History, except in more recent times of Feminazi insurrection. It works particularly well as a disciplinary measure in cases of intractable arrogance or haughtiness; the outspoken female quickly learns her place with the realization that she is inferior to the Male, and must act accordingly.
“Woman” has verified her contempt for the rules here, and confirmed that she has an undisclosed agenda which is at odds with her lie that she is “genuinly (sic) interested in what he (Wolfe) has to say in response to my post” (and therefore could simply visit Wolfe’s musings…instead of trespassing here).
“Woman” has demonstrated that the words she speaks cannot be regarded as Truth, and that she is prepared to act dishonestly in order to further her Feminazi agenda. She is a shining example of the deception and deceit to be expected from an unprincipled female. It’s a big Red flag to watch out for.
“Woman” is a Liar, and I’ve proved it conclusively with evidence. It’s no wonder she wants to “agree to differ so as to end this conversation”. As usual, women’s tangled bullshit can’t survive a simple logic test, and “Woman” is running away from the truth.
Accordingly, everything “Woman” posts from now on should be considered lying trash…because she IS a liar.
October 17th, 2007 at 9:27 am - IP Man-Hash: 1b282541e5f4b
Fully agreed upon. If you dont like the way the game is being played here, leave. We never asked for a “discussion” or a “talk”. This is manly talk. Handle the comments or leave. We do not conform to what YOU wish to hear. Keep in mind that YOU are the guest and should do as all guests do - respect the host’s rules.
October 17th, 2007 at 9:46 am - IP Man-Hash: 7c0657c0c4763
hang on will go google American Feminazi do you have to be american to be one?
October 17th, 2007 at 10:39 am - IP Man-Hash: 2385f3847dc8b
Listen to Mansvoice and stop being pedantic. Unless you’re completely retarded, you know exactly what the terminology infers.
October 17th, 2007 at 10:44 am - IP Man-Hash: 2385f3847dc8b
Woman hasn’t learned. Here’s her reminder that she’s a liar.
Woman has been truth tested on these words, and proved a liar.
She continues to trespass here. Accordingly, everything “Woman” posts from now on should be considered lying trash.
October 17th, 2007 at 12:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0264d76590fb0
Mansman: I prefer she be allowed to post so I can get a good belly laugh at her antics. Its just so amusing.
October 17th, 2007 at 2:30 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7cff7535f53d1
Thank You Detached I am glad to hear I made someone laugh. Its good for the Soul and very healing, as it releases endorphins.