All Women Are Whores Part II
“It’s okay for men to sleep around, but when women do it, they’re called sluts!”
Man do I hate talking to women.
Talking to women is like prancing around in the backyard of someone who has five Dalmatians. First of all, you’re prancing and you shouldn’t be doing that, but more importantly have you seen what five Dalmatians can do to a backyard?
You shouldn’t even open the backdoor unless you’re wearing galoshes. And that’s exactly what you need to wade through women and their endless mouth shit.
Take this fucking gem.
“It’s okay for men to sleep around but women are sluts! That’s a double standard.”
No, sweetheart, that tank top is a double standard. A double standard of sexy.
I’m joking, but that’s all it takes to get that pre-rage, five-seconds-to-meltdown shrew to abandon her principles and taxi right back into the landing zone. Women are rock-solid reliable that way. I think I read something about how Jesus was deterred several times by a little harmless flirting.
Oh wait, no I didn’t. Because Jesus was a man.
Women have absolutely no clue what a “double standard” is. For every woman who’s ever said the words, there’re six who wish they would have and twenty who don’t know what the fuck anyone is talking about but are pretty sure they agree. Women think like seagulls. If they see anything that looks like bread (attention) they pounce on it like a flock of ravenous savages.
But what am I talking about?
The statement “It’s okay for men to sleep around but when women do it, they’re sluts” is complete bullshit. To women, it’s not okay at all for men to sleep around. No woman on Earth thinks that’s okay. They do, however, love it.
Women love a man-whore like they love oxygen. I’m not talking about oxygen for breathing either. I’m talking about oxygen for cleaning their pores — which more of them should do more often.
And men? Men don’t give ten shits if anyone’s a whore — except their daughters, sisters, and mothers; obviously, but that’s only because that manner of female philandery reflects poorly on a man.
Women think men think “it’s not okay for women to be whores” because women will believe anything we tell them. And we can tell them whatever we want. That’s one of the many prerogatives of being a man — doing and saying whatever you want, whenever you want. Nature knows that you as a man will use this responsibly, that’s why she gave you all the brains and muscle and not the fat ass.
I love you.
I have no idea what that is.
I totally respect you. For real.
Don’t make me laugh. Respect is earned. No woman has ever earned anything in her life.
Related Articles:

















Pages: « 18 17 [16] 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 … 1 » Show All
All women know this, so the reason any relationship fails is always the woman’s fault every time.
Martial hardship is because of women. In this case, it’s because of your mother.
-Dick
This is something that feminists have a difficult time with:
Holding a job isn’t the same as contributing to civilization.
I would argue that the greatest contribution any human can make to civilization is raising well-adjusted children. I’d gladly trade my left leg to do so full-time.
In any case, I stipulate that many women hold jobs. Now multiply that number by ten thousand, and you have the number of female parasites, either by not holding a job or by being parasitic in some other way.
Civilization, not society. Any two pygmies in the jungle can have a society. A civilization is another matter entirely.
How to women contribute to the growth and maintenance of civilization?
In my office, we have a number of women. None of them contribute to even our company, much less civilization. They are to a person incompetant, back-stabbing, useless parasites trying to claw or sleep their way to the top. Not a single one of them is capable of doing their job: that’s left to their male co-workers.
This is what I’ve generally observed everywhere I’ve worked. Women may hold a job, but they’re actually parasites. Were they all fired tomorrow, productivity would increase dramatically.
As I’ve said, I stipulate that there are a small handful of women who are contributing. There are ten thousand times that number who are simply parasites.
Don’t even get me started about modern teachers. They are among the most ignorant individuals currently in the workforce. At least half of my job as a father is correcting them so that my own children don’t grow up ignorant.
Here’s a wonderful anecdote: my kids are allergic to almost every animal on the planet but guinea pigs. They have five of them. When questioned, one of my daughters’ teachers authoritatively announced that guinea pigs are pigs (swine), and that pigs aren’t mammals.
Any fool knows that guinea pigs are rodents, and that both rodents and swine are mammals.
My grandmother has some land on which sits a one-room schoolhouse that closed in the late 1950s. It still contains a mountain of vintage textbooks and literature. I triple-dog dare any modern high school teacher to teach from third- and fourth-grade textbooks from the 1950s. I’ve seen them and been utterly disgusted at how ignorant modern teachers are.
In general, all modern “teachers” or “educators” should be fired en masse and replaced with corporate trainers from successful companies. These are people who are used to actually producing productive individuals and whose jobs rely on increased production.
Goddamned affirmative action! It’s screwing up everything. I’m sure there are many men in their firms there to clean up after the women fuck up everything.
“Again, I say that for every one woman legitimately attempting to contribute to civilization, there are ten thousand greedy, self-ignorant, drunken sluts. Because of this, the number of women actually contributing to civilization is at best statistically insignificant.”
But as I said, many, many women hold jobs (in fact, the majority of them). Any personal aspects of them aside, they are somehow contributing to society. My mother is a clinical scientist (basically a researcher and advisor) to a pharmaceutical company, my aunt is an accountant, my other aunt is a teacher, etc. They aren’t parasites or greedy, ignorant, drunken sluts; they’ve used equality of opportunity in order to contribute to society. With the exception of my aunt who is a teacher, I doubt they would have been able to contribute in the way they have without that opportunity.
“Again, I say that for every one woman legitimately attempting to contribute to civilization, there are ten thousand greedy, self-ignorant, drunken sluts. Because of this, the number of women actually contributing to civilization is at best statistically insignificant.”
But as I said, many, many women hold jobs. I’d say the majority hold jobs. Any personal aspects of them aside, they are somehow contributing to society. My mother is a clinical scientist (basically a researcher and advisor) to a pharmaceutical company, my aunt is an accountant, my other aunt is a teacher, etc. T
I’m glad you agree she’s stupid, Luka.
Again, I say that for every one woman legitimately attempting to contribute to civilization, there are ten thousand greedy, self-ignorant, drunken sluts. Because of this, the number of women actually contributing to civilization is at best statistically insignificant.
The same is not true of men.
I’ll suggest something to you that was something of an epiphany for me in terms of explaining just why women behave so much differently than men:
In order to survive, men must work. Women can survive without working.
You’ll probably object, but before doing so, I would encourage you to examine the real outcome of men not working. Men will die. The same is not true of women: family and society will always intervene to keep women from dying if they choose not to work.
No wonder men and women look at the world differently. I can’t honestly say what I’d think of a world in which I wasn’t required to work at some point in order to eat, have clothes, and put a roof over my head. All I know is that not having that requirement for my entire life would give me a radically erroneous worldview.
I won’t speak about your parents specifically, partly because I don’t know them and partly because I don’t want to disillusion you.
However …
If they’re doing a good job of parenting, the children are never aware of any problems. Until my we told the kids we were divorcing, my children were unaware that our marriage was DOA. When we argued, it was when they weren’t present. They were certainly too young to understand anything about sex, and we’d've never made that public in any case.
In short, if they’re parenting you correctly, everything should appear hunky-dory to you no matter how hideous life may be for either of them.
All I can tell you is that from talking to a large number of men over several generations (from my grandfather to my uncles to my peers to younger married men), the cycle is alarmingly familiar. After marriage, sex gradually decreases. As soon as the woman feels like she’s done procreating, sex ceases entirely. Emotional and psychological support similarly ceases until the man’s primary role in a woman’s life is as a source of money.
You may not like her (many women don’t), but I’d suggest you pick up Dr. Laura Schlessinger’s book The Proper Care and Feeding of Husbands. In it, Dr. Laura uses many examples of men in precisely the situation I describe. I’ve known many men who read the book and comment, “I’m on every page.”
I objected to the idea that women haven’t done anything productive with equality of opportunity, but I can understand that one can have a career and still be a greedy, gold-digging slut, as you put it.
As for marriage, I can’t comment much because I’m not married. However, from what I’ve observed through my parents, maritial hardship seems to be the result of the stress and responsibilities involved. My parents both greatly neglected themselves and their relationship in order to pay the bills and raise my sister and I. Fundementally, however, they seem to be unendingly supportive of each other.
Having a career and being a greedy, gold-digging slut aren’t mutually exclusive.
As an example: my ex and I are both in lucrative fields. During our marriage, she earned $10K and $30K more than I.
She was still a greedy, gold-digging slut. Nor was she unique: most professional women are also greedy, gold-digging sluts.
In general, after women have the number of children they want, they end sex and emotional support of their husbands. Men become nothing more than a paycheck and a source of physical labor. It would be nice if this weren’t the case, but it is.
To be sure, women’s jobs have changed. They’re not just taking care of home and children. They are, however, greedy, gold-digging sluts.
“You say you can carve your life as you please… can you stop your natural cycle?”
Women can, yes. There are lots of surgeries and pills that can prevent the whole thing.
I never said I was a woman. You never directly asked me what my gender was, so I’ve never felt the need to say.
And I just remembered that the opposite of love is not hate. Hatred means you still care, which isn’t opposite. The true opposite is discord. Bye, thank you for telling me your points. I’ll consider them, but you’ve made it clear that that’s not important, so… I don’t care about your opinion… so… eh, I’m hungry. Later guys. Enjoy yourselves.
No, Alex is not stupid, she just happens to have a different view to you.
Great points Dakota.
The drunken peasants born with balls flip burgers and wash cars and build roads and all other neccessary works.
A piece of shit bottom barrel male is worth more than the smartest female on the planet.
Alex you’re fucking stupid.
Get a clue.
“Women squander their freedom by refusing to be anything more than greedy, gold-digging sluts.”
That isn’t true. Many, many women have legitimate careers that they couldn’t have pursued without equality of opportunity.
Exactly.
Great fucking post, Billy!
Human. You banter on and on facetiously about being considerate.
Why don’t you pawn your scuba gear or scratch that trip to Nepal and make use of the money to financially come to the aid of a few homeless folk?
There surely must be a few hapless people living on the sidewalk near you. The downtrodden are an intrinsic part of society. Always been. Hopefully won’t always be like this, but through the goodwill and wit of men and not internment in concentration/extermination camps.
I believe risking disease, starvation or freezing to death on the sidewalk nearly everyday is quite a deal more meriting of commiseration than having to use UberMegaSuperTamponâ„¢ - Jumbo size a few days a month.
- GALLEON - One sign (extended version)
You are so decieved. Nobody kept women from learning or seeing the world and they had more time to invent then most men did. In fact that had loads of time but would rather spend it with Oprah.
Level playing files?… Wrong again the field isn’t level it’s all downhill to the poor disadvantaged women now. Wrong again women didn’t gain equal rights but more privileges. Women are pretending to be working. They don’t work well at anything but expect things handed to them on a silver platter. I once was all for equal rights until women proved they weren’t.
Why should I be considerate to you inconsiderate bitches? You are not considerate enough to take heed to the sign that says “No women allowed” so you rudely stay here against our wishes and toss your insanity to the wind. You women expect respect and give none. Show some respect here for a change and leave.
Show yourself as considerate and go away.
No doubt women are the dumbest group of people on earth.
Hello *waves*