All Women Are Whores Part II
“It’s okay for men to sleep around, but when women do it, they’re called sluts!”
Man do I hate talking to women.
Talking to women is like prancing around in the backyard of someone who has five Dalmatians. First of all, you’re prancing and you shouldn’t be doing that, but more importantly have you seen what five Dalmatians can do to a backyard?
You shouldn’t even open the backdoor unless you’re wearing galoshes. And that’s exactly what you need to wade through women and their endless mouth shit.
Take this fucking gem.
“It’s okay for men to sleep around but women are sluts! That’s a double standard.”
No, sweetheart, that tank top is a double standard. A double standard of sexy.
I’m joking, but that’s all it takes to get that pre-rage, five-seconds-to-meltdown shrew to abandon her principles and taxi right back into the landing zone. Women are rock-solid reliable that way. I think I read something about how Jesus was deterred several times by a little harmless flirting.
Oh wait, no I didn’t. Because Jesus was a man.
Women have absolutely no clue what a “double standard” is. For every woman who’s ever said the words, there’re six who wish they would have and twenty who don’t know what the fuck anyone is talking about but are pretty sure they agree. Women think like seagulls. If they see anything that looks like bread (attention) they pounce on it like a flock of ravenous savages.
But what am I talking about?
The statement “It’s okay for men to sleep around but when women do it, they’re sluts” is complete bullshit. To women, it’s not okay at all for men to sleep around. No woman on Earth thinks that’s okay. They do, however, love it.
Women love a man-whore like they love oxygen. I’m not talking about oxygen for breathing either. I’m talking about oxygen for cleaning their pores — which more of them should do more often.
And men? Men don’t give ten shits if anyone’s a whore — except their daughters, sisters, and mothers; obviously, but that’s only because that manner of female philandery reflects poorly on a man.
Women think men think “it’s not okay for women to be whores” because women will believe anything we tell them. And we can tell them whatever we want. That’s one of the many prerogatives of being a man — doing and saying whatever you want, whenever you want. Nature knows that you as a man will use this responsibly, that’s why she gave you all the brains and muscle and not the fat ass.
I love you.
I have no idea what that is.
I totally respect you. For real.
Don’t make me laugh. Respect is earned. No woman has ever earned anything in her life.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 18 … 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 [4] 3 2 1 » Show All
Nuns love a man-whore. Nuns love everyone. It’s part of the whole God thing.
-Dick
Lepaver,
What about priests? Nuns and priests have chosen to devote their lives to God and the study of the teachings of and word of God. They get fufillment in their lives from this love of God, rather than fufillment from the love of another person. Using them as an example is ridiculous.
“No woman has ever earned anything in her life.” Is this just your opinion, or have you found actual data to back up this idea? Also, on the earlier note you made that women love a man-whore, why do you believe this to be true? What about nuns?
They are, Oldone. And don’t get her started on dolphins.
-Big Al
Female, it seems often that you are against individual responsibility as though it is the fault of the “collective� rather than the person making the poor decisions. Again, very “1984� and very disturbing. I wonder what is next, are spoons to be blamed for Rosie O’Donell being fat and cars to be blamed for automotive accidents?
Blondie, I was addressing a certain female who uses that handle to post here. For clarification the first sentence should have read:
“Female, you obviously don’t…”
Very well said. I agree, except for the first sentence. It should read “some people i.e females and males don’t understand….”
Is the one word answer “NO”?
Do u want to see my tits???
Only a woman would attend a “talk” or, indeed, write a whole book on a question which has a one word answer.
-Big Al
Women are too fond of deflecting their own personal responsibility on someone else’s shoulders
Female Said:
“Unfortunately that also precludes you from being able to do anything to change the situation. Whatever”
The only thing I could do to prevent my woman from cheating is having her wear a chastity belt. Otherwise you are correct, I dont have anything to do with whether she chooses to spread her legs or not.
Female Said:
“I mean that sometimes you can’t fully express your individual identity, so you compromise and behave/do what the other person wants or needs you to do. You tend to sacrifice what you want or might prefer to do, to some degree.”
I dont know how the women are in australia, but here in the US, women do this all the time. There is a catch though, most women do not express the individual identity until after the honeymoon is over. Uptil the point of saying “I do”, women say or do what is necessary to get those wedding vows. There are varying degrees of this, but every woman here does it.
I have seen friends get married, and within a 3 year time frame, the woman he married is no longer identifiable. Physical-wise, persoanlity-wise and mentally.
Like my friend Bill, I knew him before he met his wife. When he met his future wife, he was on cloud nine. They made the greatest couple I ever saw. They BOTH went out their ways to make each other happy. Hell, if Bill had stop by her place to pick something up, and then leave, Tina would make it a point to have make-up on and her hair presentable. Bill went above and beyond, what he should have, for her. He felt he had someone very special with him, I totally agreed. At times, I was somewhat envious of him, but happy for him all the same.
Bill started realize what Tina was like, less than a year after marrying her.
The long beautiful blond tresses she had, were cut into a “bob” 6 months after the honeymoon. Without having kids or getting pregnant, she gained 25 pounds. (Note: Bill dated her for 3 years before marrying her, she didn’t gain a single ounce in those 3 years.) The sweet woman that would do anything for her man was replaced by critical harpy. Things that never bothered her before, were a never ending irritant to her. (Example: When Bill met Tina, Bill was a smoker. Tina never complained about his smoking when dating. Not in front of me and Bill stated she never complained about it either. Guess what?! NOW IT IS A PROBLEM!) Now Bill can never do anything right, and he can never escape the bitching. Bill and I, hang out, play pool, and relax every once in a while. Even those times of escape, his electronic leash rings and guess what, Tina is bitching about something again. Even when leaving the house he cant escape the abuse.
Not all women over here are not as bad as Tina, but most men over here see their women go through the “transformation” after saying “I do.” Some tranformations are quicker than others, some have more drastic degrees of transformation, than others.
However, Bill and I have determined that womens’s true identities are revealed after getting married, not before. Men are the ones that compromise their behaviors, not the women.
Using your own reasoning and argument means, that Bill would be totally within reason to not only cheat, but take the kids, divorce his wife and demand child support and alimony. All of this, because the enviormental factors that Tina is creating in his life?!
Female obviously don’t understand how a relationship works (which could be said of most women). You don’t conform or change yourself to your partners liking. Then you wouldn’t be the person you know and this would cause psychological problems. Also, if someone is asking you to change to conform to their liking, they are not a person anyone needs to be with. This is a sign of a mental deficiency, in that they are emotional immature by reason that they cannot accept the faults of their significant other and are unable to resolve problems. In a real relationship, two people accept each other for who they are, they maintain their own individual being, but they create a new one together. My Grandma said it best “There’s me, and there’s him and then there’s us.” It’s the personality of the couple. He goes out with the guys and he is him. She goes out with the girls and she is her. They go to a party together, and everyone sees the couple not the individuals.
Let me simplify the cheating issue for you. If you have a problem, you do not introduce a new problem to solve the old. Cheating is not an option, ever. If your car had a transmission problem, would you pour a bag of sugar in the gas tank and gum up the engine to get someone to pay attention to the transmission? HELL NO! You take the car to the shop and fix the fucking transmission. That is the point. If you want the problem fixed, address the problem.
I tell you one thing Female, “Your babble is not Nessary”.
I agree. I must be off to the talk on “Are Men Necessary”. Ciao.
I mean that sometimes you can’t fully express your individual identity, so you compromise and behave/do what the other person wants or needs you to do. You tend to sacrifice what you want or might prefer to do, to some degree.
Yes. Though in her case, she has some of the psychology of an abuser, and had I been paying close enough attention, it was in evidence prior to our marriage. In that respect, I am at least in part to blame, inasmuch as I either failed to noticed the red flags or downplayed the ones that I did notice. If I had it to do over, I simply would have terminated the relationship before it got to a marriage. The signs that it would eventually go bad were there.
I don’t understand. One always has one’s individual identity in a relationship. Being in a relationship doesn’t transform you into a hybrid being, the relationship is just something you do together.
There’s me, there’s the woman, and there’s our relationship. The two identities don’t somehow merge, we just have this thing we do together called a “relationship.”
I didn’t say I didn’t have any effect. I said that cheating on one’s spouse or significant other isn’t excused by problems in the relationship between them. An individual chooses how to respond. Choosing to respond to problems in the relationship by cheating on the other person is a bad choice, indicative of poor character, that’s all.
Dakota Smith
Okay, so let me get this straight.
You met your former wife, thought she was a pretty decent sort of person, fell in love, married her and had a couple of kids.
Somewhere along the way she became this completely different person, individually, within your marriage. This makes me wonder because marriage is supposed to be a partnership and it just doesnt seem to fit that somehow you can be completely individual within that sort of set up, but let’s just say, for your argument’s sake, that you can and in that case, I agree with you. On the off chance that I am in the right here, in terms of thinking that most people find it difficult to hold onto their own identity completely when in a relationship, then I have to wonder what exactly happens in marriages when someone goes from being “we” to “I”, closely followed by “me and the third party”.
If you believe you have no effect in determining the quality of your relationship and by implication your partner’s feelings/thoughts and behaviours, then all well and good. I would only believe that if suddenly your partner was struck down by a parasitic infection (possibly from a pet) which completely changed their individual behaviour.
Yes. Precisely.
Certainly, but an individual chooses how to deal with environmental stimuli. They are not locked into a specific pattern of behavior that says, “If this certain thing happens to me, then I must respond a certain way, no questions asked.”
If a woman cheats on me, it’s her responsibility, end of story. Similarly, if I cheat on a woman, it’s my responsibility, no one else’s. See the reason why I didn’t cheat on the skank during our marriage for details.
Dakota Smith
By your logic, people’s behaviour is all individualistic. Every person’s behaviour can simply be attributed to that individual, either their genes or their astrological birth chart or whatever. I don’t agree with you. Humans are social and behaviour doesn’t take place in a vacuum. Even with symptomatic conditions that result from genetic abnormalities, there is usually an environmental stimulus involved. You like playing the blame game as this obsolves you from responsibility/accountability/guilt etc. Unfortunately that also precludes you from being able to do anything to change the situation. Whatever.
Sure it is! Women have earned that right.
And what we’re saying is that you’re wrong. They are not one and the same.
No, people who lack the character to work out the problems in the relationship cheat. The rationalizations they cling to in order to excuse their lack character are irrelvant.
We understand what you’re saying. You’re wrong, that’s all.
Dakota Smith