All Women Are Whores Part III
In the building phase, I tentatively called this article, “Men Are Better Than Women At Being Nerds.” That’s true on its own, but what I’m going to talk about here is so much bigger and more bombastic I’ve decided to up the ante.
All women are whores. I know it and you know it, and now nerds do too.
What is a nerd first of all? I’m a man so naturally I have all the answers.
Nerds are a lot like obscenities. You know them when you see them and no amount of man-talking out your man-ass is going to make that any simpler (manpler). For the sake of this article, let’s just say a nerd is certainly anyone who goes to a Star Wars convention and participates in or enjoys dressing up like Star Wars characters. That’s a generous definition as it could easily be argued to be anyone reading about Star Wars conventions and sending me fucking links about Star Wars conventions, but let’s just leave it for the time being.
According to the article at the bottom of this very one you’re reading, the new trend sweeping the world of dressing up like Star Wars characters at Star Wars conventions is women dressing up in slutty versions of said characters. I don’t know what offends my man sensibilities more in this case: the flagrant display of sexuality where it is completely inappropriate, or the lame contrived way women choose to shit all over cherish childhood memories and the formation of new ones.
The last thing I want to see is Darth Vader with a nice rack and fucking slits cut out of that super suit of his so he can show off a little thigh. What in the fuck! Bravo, ladies. You put boobs on a Stormtrooper uniform.
Men are better than women at being nerds because men understand what it is to be a nerd. It means being interested and committed to an idea or a set of ideas in a way some might consider fanatical. Does that sound familiar? You’ve probably heard it before. That’s right, it’s called fucking democracy.
Democracy was founded by a bunch of nerds who were nerdy for your civil liberties — and boy were they fucking nerdy. They drafted little nerd memos to each other called Bills of Rights and wrote secret nerd journals about fantasies of voting and free trade and other things a woman with a PhD in economics still couldn’t wrap her fucking head around. That’s what a man nerd is capable of.
A woman nerd is capable of trouncing around in a cute outfit and getting attention she has no business getting. First of all, that’s dangerous to women. The last thing women need to experience is a life they can never have. Women don’t have the metaphysical grappling strength of men. They can’t haul themselves out of a shithole if that’s where they were born like you and I can. If a woman has a lazy-eye, she’s fucked. Sammy Davis Jr. didn’t even have a fucking eye and look at what he accomplished. That’s called being a man.
Women’s only skill — and I use that term loosely — is dressing sexy. Not subtly sexy either. Think of Yoda ears on a girl in a bikini or something dumb like that. I don’t know because I didn’t read the article I’m about to link to and I certainly didn’t try to find any additional pictures.
Women are whores.
Related Articles:
May 26th, 2008 at 3:38 pm - IP Man-Hash: f42c56a3b67c9
Nerds couldn’t have created democracy. Certainly men did not create it. It was probably orginally thought up by women, influencing men to do away with oligarchies in an ancient society where trade and tax were important to building a navy/army. Why, because nerds prefer to solve political problems in much more direct systems, if they are true MEN, real nerds that is!
[In any case, modern representative democracy is a foolish system of govt likely to help speed up the extinction of mankind, as it panders to consumers and thus big business and energy moghuls.]
Men are not better at being committed to democracy or any other system of govt. It is just that historically, since men stopped being hunters, and women gave up their natural state: the political control of the home, and the village, men took over.
But men are poor politicians, and they resort to violence too often. American democracy was founded by English/Scottish philosophers who had studied the ancients and British law, and wanted to continue to have a say in who taxed them, and why.
A nerd could not have been responsible for a system thought up by women and put into place by these philosophers. They were just extending the British democracy to America, and eliminating the King from the scene. Most nerds I know much prefer violent means to solving political problems than thoughtful ones, such as giving people rights. Eventually a few of them, like George Washington did so. He won most of the war with French help and by running away from the superior British enemy.
In any case, democracy does not give you any more rights than any other form of govt. Some democracies can be fearful places to live in, if you cross them! America is a great example of just such a system.
Now, real nerds, and real men, who wanted to avoid violent struggles, would create a much better system. I will call this MERITOCRACY. Why, every nerd I’ve ever met wanted to rule the world, and would much prefer to do so based on how many exams - academic and physical - they had passed. If the world was ruled by MERIT, then we can surely say that MEN WERE IN CONTROL, since no woman would have the intellectual and physical ability to pass the set of examinations that a true MERITOCRACY would require its leaders to pass. AND OLD People would also be KICKED out, as they the physical exams - the assault course - would be too much for them.
TRUE NERDS, with good physical strength, would become RULERS. And that is surely a good thing. Fucking whores and women need not apply.
May 26th, 2008 at 3:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: 6bf5d1cafefe3
‘Democracy’ is just a fanfare for the same old elite dominion. Voting is a con-trick cooked up to fool the masses into thinking they run things - when in fact Bohemian Grove and other power-elites really rule.
May 26th, 2008 at 3:49 pm - IP Man-Hash: f42c56a3b67c9
Women do have the metaphysical grappling strength of men. In fact there’s little intellectual difference between us. If she is born ugly, then that does not stop her from greatness. For example, Lise Meitner was the person behind splitting the atom. Hahn and his colleagues in Germany, and thus the Manhattan Project, would not have succeeded if it were not for Lise Meitner. She is just one woman who was a great scientist and scholar. Thus to say that women are inferior this way is untrue and against the evidence.
Now most people would not agree that a woman’s only skill is to dress sexily and not subtly either. This is nonsense. If a man is out to get a woman, does he dress in an overcoat in mid-summer? Of course not. If a woman wants to be fucked then she’s going to dress to get fucked. That’s a fact.
A few women push this concept further, and because they are stupid, lazy, come from bad homes, enjoy it, or are on drugs or just perv’s then they become WHORES.
May 26th, 2008 at 3:55 pm - IP Man-Hash: f42c56a3b67c9
Not quite. Because the USA no longer has a monarchy. So its not true that it is the old elites. In the US it is elites who have won the economic social wars that go on between families. It’s a legalised mafia, one family against the other. Whereas in Britain, we have a party political system that allows anyone who can obtain local support to rule. You don’t have to be rich to rule Britain. It is still a bad system because it gives the power to parties, and parties are corrupted by big business. The ‘cash for honours scandal for example.
May 26th, 2008 at 4:07 pm - IP Man-Hash: a28a8fa6fa63a
I agree. As a matter of fact. A man could never have created the special theory of relativity either. It was really invented by a woman who whispered the formula in Einstein’s ear. One of the dirty little secrets of science. Keep posting, my friend, keep posting. We need more people like you to explain the world to us.
May 26th, 2008 at 4:30 pm - IP Man-Hash: 274333e3d4b88
He’s actually right about Meitner. Hahn was a chemist who set up an experiment that caused nuclear fission; he looked at the data, and did not know what the hell was going on. Meitner looked at his data and knew it was fission. Hahn was a great experimentalist and Meitner a great theoretical physicist who most certainly should have received the Nobel Prize with Hahn. But right now she is the ONLY female theoretical physicist that I, and probably just about anybody else, can think of. Its not hard to come up with a list of male theoretical physicists: Plank, Einstein, Schrodinger, Heinsenberg, Dirac, Fermi, Gamov, etc.
May 26th, 2008 at 4:46 pm - IP Man-Hash: a28a8fa6fa63a
I’m sure she was a great scientist. What I’m satirizing is a statement like this: “Hahn and his colleagues in Germany, and thus the Manhattan Project, would not have succeeded if it were not for Lise Meitner. ”
This is such a typical “let’s exaggerate the importance of a certain female scientist so as to make the overall record of women look less pathetic” type of thing.
If you know something about science, then you’ll know that if one person doesn’t discover something, then somebody else will, a short time later. The closer you get to the modern age, the fewer the exceptions to this. Many inventions and discoveries are even done simultaneously by people working independently of each other. Virtually all cultural achievements are collective achievements in the end.
June 25th, 2008 at 1:26 am - IP Man-Hash: a1cede7b56794
It’s kinda mean but at the same time its for a good reason really.
Infections are easily brought on with out it.
I’m border line with it.
Todays society has been taught to accept circumcision as a requirement or the “norm” for males born today, but on the other hand…who is to judge what is normal and what is not?
I don’t know…like I said I’m borderline with this argument.
I don’t think its right that mothers make the decision but its not like the baby can. They would have to wait until they were adult and mature enough to understand.
but again, on the other hand,
It’s like cropping an australian shephards tail, It’s done to the species because its a herding dog, meaning it herds cattle and sheep which could harm the animal and maybe even kill it. So the tail Is cropped to ensure that its tail is not stepped on and its back is not broken. To ensure the creatures saftey. The same goes for men.
To ensure that that man will grow and live a healthy life with out potential infection, which could lead to death.
June 25th, 2008 at 1:38 am - IP Man-Hash: 2d80136710951
If you’re so concerned about men leading healthy lives, I’ve got a much simpler, more humane suggestion that cutting chunks off his cock.
Prevent the mother from making any fucking decisions about his upbringing whatsoever. Not only does it make him less likely to become delinquent, apathetic and un-achieving, it also reduces his chances of infection by the social parasite that is feminism.
June 25th, 2008 at 1:42 am - IP Man-Hash: a28a8fa6fa63a
Agreed.
Don’t be silly. Circumcision is not common in Europe, for instance, surely they would have noticed if it caused health problems. In the US the practice is also in decline, because it’s an unwarranted child mutilation.
Actually experts are divided on the benefits. Even in HIV/AIDS affected regions in Africa the benefit is not clear. (It slows down infection rate, but not necessarily the number of deaths)
June 25th, 2008 at 1:46 am - IP Man-Hash: a1cede7b56794
Big mouth for a man who whouldnt be here had it been for his mother enduring 9 mothes of your shit, LITERALLY.
But you don’t have to be a douche about it when its only my opinion.
I didn’t insult you nor argue against what you believe in. I only stated the facts. Their are just was many faults in men as there are on women. Just get over yourself and come down from the pedistool you think you sit on.
June 25th, 2008 at 1:52 am - IP Man-Hash: 2d80136710951
And you wouldn’t be here if you could read. So what are we talking about?
June 25th, 2008 at 1:54 am - IP Man-Hash: a1cede7b56794
Something as simple as a paper cut could lead to death. (if left untreated and dipped in aids) but there is still the possibility. As there is a possibility for anything whether its proven otherwise. Possibility is something that is unknown by humans and the unknown is their biggest fear so they do anything possible to avoid the unknown, but what they dont realize is it’s still unknown and therefore unable to predict and certainly prevent.
It’s just another flaw like the many others we have to face. I DO think its wrong yes…its a horrible process and the baby is in extreme pain after, which isn’t fair. And the mother shouldnt have any right to do such a thing. but again…ever since it was accepted in to society people have seen it was normal and thats why basic instinct and social standards conflict.
June 25th, 2008 at 1:58 am - IP Man-Hash: a1cede7b56794
look…Im not looking for an argument, while you clearly are, im not like those dumbass women who make life complicated. Despite whether you say I am. I admit, I do have some womenly flaws that unfortunatly came with the package. I’m a NON-MALE like dick stated. I hang out with men, I talk to men, I HATE WOMEN. I WISH I WEREN’T ONE! But i had no choice in what I was going to be.
Now, act like an adult and drop the insults.
June 25th, 2008 at 2:26 am - IP Man-Hash: 2d80136710951
I’m not arguing. I’m waiting for you to stop making all my arguments for me.
This is one of the most fundamental reasons men are better than women. Women hate everyone, especially themselves. Every time they get an opportunity to speak, their mouths turn into geysers of shit that ruin everything. Men don’t hate women, they just want to end the shit-storm and get back to keeping the earth from falling off it’s axis just like our fathers did.
June 25th, 2008 at 2:37 am - IP Man-Hash: a1cede7b56794
No, thats where your wrong. I am not to say what people like nor do I have to right. I am not those said people, and I do not hate them as people I hate them as sterotypical women. so dont be so quick to judge. I do see dicks point. He covers most women, meaning the women who ARE what has be stereotyped as being a women. He would have to change the title if he included women such as myself thus bringing his “manlyness” and RESPECT down a notch. We wouldnt want that, now would we.
June 25th, 2008 at 2:48 am - IP Man-Hash: 2eb3c3c0957bf
A wise man once said:
Female anger is the weathervane of truth.
-Dick Masterson
June 25th, 2008 at 2:53 am - IP Man-Hash: a1cede7b56794
You leave out the 10% of women who actually DO understand and even agree. So really its just a general idea. No specifics, No REAL facts stating that ALL women are like this. Ive noticed in your writing that you try to sound as witty as possible to draw in the reader…well, that goes against you JUST getting “straight to the point” now doesnt it? No, that wasn’t wit. That was fact.
You choose to write, so I have no say, BUT, I DO think that it should be stated that there are women out there that DO NOT fit these crude stereotypes.
but other than that keep writing because u are hitting the nail on the head when it comes to most women in general.
June 25th, 2008 at 2:55 am - IP Man-Hash: a1cede7b56794
What? Can’t come up with something yourself so you have to copy and paste something Dick said?
June 25th, 2008 at 3:00 am - IP Man-Hash: a1cede7b56794
Agreed