Antidepressants Are Depressing Me
Click below to get Dick in your Ear and listen to the podcast of this article.
Of all the women I know who are on antidepressants, 100% of them have told me.
When it comes to women and their stupid mental problems that I don’t give a fuck about, I wish patients had to respect the doctor/client confidentiality agreement as well. That would not only make my life a lot less whiny, but it would also make every first date happening in Utah on any given Friday night about two awkward silences smoother.
If you weren’t aware, Utah has the highest per capita female usage of prescription antidepressants in the world. No one knows why, but it’s probably because Utah is extremely religious, and we all know women take to religion about as well as they take to using whiskey as a lubricant. It stings you for a minute, it stings her for a lifetime.
Men are better than women.
Men do not air our dirty laundry all over the place like we’re doing the world a favor.
First of all, men have an infinite number of classifications for “used” before we get to “dirty”. That’s how we stay attracted to women — no matter how many kids they have. Used does not equal dirty. Just because a pair of jeans are in the washing machine, doesn’t mean they’re dirty. Maybe you just sat on a Gummi Bear. It’s not like you shit yourself.
Secondly, men are better than women at taking prescription antidepressants.
I have known a friend of mine for two and a half years. Just this weekend, I found out he had a kid. I am manlighted to say that at this rate, I won’t know about his Xanax addiction until a woman is sitting in the Oval Office — which will be never.
Women can’t shut their mouths about what they shove down their throats. Zoloft, Lustral, Effexor, Wellbutrin, Zyban, Cymbalta, Lexapro, Paxil, Aropax, Cutting, Anorexia; to women those are all just another word for attention.
Why else would the depression rate for women be double that of men? It’s not like any woman ever got rich as shit in her 30’s and then realized she married way under their league. Do they have a drug for that?
Medicare should cover divorces.
Since all women were born with an unlimited debtors account at the Bank of Vagina Fargo, I see absolutely no reason why they should ever be depressed. Other than the reason that they fucking love being depressed.
For women, depression is a time machine into a world of being a good for fuck teenager, who doesn’t know shit about shit except that the refrigerator is magic, the day starts at 2PM, and money is something Republicans invented because George Bush hates black people.
Related Articles:
August 10th, 2007 at 6:37 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9b0b9a4016949
Ang. There is one rule that you should all live by.
1.) If you are going to put me through the excruciating torture of listening to you blather about your depression because of the “men” in your life you’ve already broken the rule! The whole point of this was WE DON’T WANT TO HEAR ABOUT YOUR ISSUES with men, life, menstrual cycle or otherwise! If you want sympathy that’s what your girlfriends are for. If want a solution, that’s what men are for. No, you deal with it. Furthermore, what do you sit your child in front of on Saturday morning? A fucking Martin Luther King speech? You’re child must simply hate you. No, my daughter probably sits in front “Disney Princess” because she lives with a women. Her Mother.
Lastly, you don’t need a man to complete you?
1.) Unfortunately due to the lack of thought you put into you’re rantings you obviously do to complete the other 9/10’s of your brain
2.) WOW! you make much more than minimum wage! That means nothing! So do millions of other women who had the nerve to write an article on Yahoo News on “How to marry a Billionaire”. The only woman that will ever sink her vampire teeth into my bank account will be my daughter and she’ll have it as I see fit.
3. Lastly, name me one woman who is real and I’ll tell you no every time! You all have had a hidden agenda since birth and have been trained for generations like The Samurai to do so. MEN ARE BETTER THAN WOMEN!
- SGT REYES
August 10th, 2007 at 6:57 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9b0b9a4016949
The issue is this Coderch. I too have unfortunately seen men who allow themselves to, as you put it “grovel for pussy”. Of course, women are finally having to come up with ways other than that to keep a grip on the man. With pussy being something we have such overstock of that it could be sold on shelves, the day I “grovel for pussy” will be the day Sadaam Hussein comes out of his grave, captures me, tortures me, drugs me and drops me in an cesspool tied to die. PUSSY IS NOTHING but a cum receptacle! IT IS NOT A FUCKING SHRINE OF POWER! When will women get that (oh wait they’re women… it’s useless)? A woman either finds a dick to fuck or spends $50 dollars on a fake one and gets herself off. Either way she will have sex and we have the AC to their DC. If the bitch is a tease, there’s a billion that are not. Ang screams feminist and bitter, depressed woman who has one friend. Her cat; and I don’t even want to know what the poor animal goes through. MEN ARE BETTER THAN WOMEN!
August 11th, 2007 at 2:59 pm - IP Man-Hash: 52ddc4a390467
The issue is this Coderch. I too have unfortunately seen men who allow themselves to, as you put it “grovel for pussy”. Of course, women are finally having to come up with ways other than that to keep a grip on the man. With pussy being something we have such overstock of that it could be sold on shelves, the day I “grovel for pussy” will be the day Sadaam Hussein comes out of his grave, captures me, tortures me, drugs me and drops me in an cesspool tied to die. PUSSY IS NOTHING but a cum receptacle! IT IS NOT A FUCKING SHRINE OF POWER! When will women get that (oh wait they’re women… it’s useless)? A woman either finds a dick to fuck or spends $50 dollars on a fake one and gets herself off. Either way she will have sex and we have the AC to their DC. If the bitch is a tease, there’s a billion that are not. Ang screams feminist and bitter, depressed woman who has one friend. Her cat; and I don’t even want to know what the poor animal goes through. MEN ARE BETTER THAN WOMEN!
The thing is that sexual desire in both genders is controlled by testosterone, and the bottom line is that men have 30 times more than women. What does this mean? That men will always desire to have casual sex to a much higher degree than women. It is as simple as that. It is the law of supply and demand. Fro every woman who wants to have casual sex, there will be dozens of men. So men must sexually compete with other men for women. As a poet once said:”Sex is somethign that women have, that men want.” So your theory that women want sex as much as men is wrong. Sex is used by women as a “prize” that they give to men who behave like they want, just liek a carrot put in front of a horse that makes him chase it all the time. Furthermore, all men want beautiful women, and these women are rare. So all men go for the same women, which gives them power. Beautiful young women have ENORMOUS power over men.
P Coderch
August 14th, 2007 at 7:36 pm - IP Man-Hash: ae179e9967da1
P Coderch, that is only true with Western women who are brainwashed by our culture. You have never been with an Eastern or Southern American women. Those women want tons of sex, enjoy their femininity, and see themselves as nothing more than something to make their man happy. And they never use sex as a prize. I suggest you date one, but be fair to them because they do know their place and they keep it. If you screw them over, they’ll become angry and you’ll contaminate the stock.
August 14th, 2007 at 9:46 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3c8b05bf321cc
Women who see themselves as nothing more than an object to make their man happy completely lack identity and are very sad. Why would you want some mindless, soulless robot catering to your every whim rather than an actual human being? Every person regardless of gender should care about the happiness of the people around them (their family, friends, significant others, etc), and do what they reasonably can to make those people happy, but no one should exist solely for that purpose.
August 14th, 2007 at 10:04 pm - IP Man-Hash: 94b3b6aecd2aa
They don’t They actually want women like you and me. But they run into problems because they STILL want us to think they’re better than we are. And, as you know from the time you’ve spent here, well…that’s just not going to happen for most of them.
So, they hope for a soulless robot, cause that’s the most they’re capable of handling.
August 14th, 2007 at 10:21 pm - IP Man-Hash: 1d7991e476ee8
I actually agree with you there, Alex. Both sides of that equation would be off.
August 15th, 2007 at 11:46 pm - IP Man-Hash: ae179e9967da1
You’re all full of shit, and you know it. You are engaging in racist hate speech against a population of women who are just better then you. It’s not that you look down on them. It’s that you look down on yourselves, and you don’t want anyone to know how worthless you are.
What you don’t get is that it’s not that they don’t have goals. They just have goals that aren’t selfish, unlike you. They’re goal is to raise a family. You’re goal is to take away jobs from men, thereby fucking over families for your selfish need to constantly consume resources to feed your bottomless pit ego.
August 16th, 2007 at 5:58 am - IP Man-Hash: 1d7991e476ee8
Let me make myself clear: I really don’t think anyone should be a mindless robot. I just don’t think anyone is, or wants anyone to be. Or if they are, it’s so incredibly rare as to be an anomaly.
Doing my part to keep my man happy is something I do freely and with full knowledge. When I make that small effort to keep him happy, he treats me like a queen. That’s something most women don’t get, because they have never seen it.
August 16th, 2007 at 6:25 am - IP Man-Hash: b49936f2bf38b
I never said that having the goal of raising a family made a person a mindless, soulless robot. I have plenty of respect for women who make that choice, even though it’s one I wouldn’t make myself. What I said is that a woman existing for the SOLE purpose of making her husband happy would be a mindless, soulless robot. Taking what you said literally, consider what living that way would imply. If she is only concerned with making him happy, she, unlike her husband, would have no regard for herself. Her own opinions, thoughts, feelings, etc. would go out the window, because any that were contrary to his, or bothersome/upsetting to him, would be suppressed in the effort to make him happy. Anything she wanted to do, that he did not approve of, she would not do. If she thinks of herself as NOTHING but something to make her husband happy, it is necessary that she abandon her own mind and will. I consider someone with no mind and will of their own to be mindless and soulless. What would you think of a man who lived only to make his wife happy?
Though, all this, of course, is taking what you said completely literally. If you meant something less extreme, then what I described wouldn’t necessarily be accurate.
My goals have nothing to do with ego or wanting wealth. I want to have a career because I would be bored crazy otherwise, and because I have passions/interests I want to pursue. Women have as much of a right to ambition as men do.
August 16th, 2007 at 6:28 am - IP Man-Hash: b49936f2bf38b
I’ll second what KellyMac said. Of course a wife should try to make her husband happy, and vice versa; I consider that very important (a marriage can’t survive otherwise). The problem is if that is someone’s ONLY concern and goal.
August 16th, 2007 at 9:46 am - IP Man-Hash: 14b7f9f8985f0
I take the view that it is next to impossible to make another person happy.
You are only responsible for your own happiness. Expecting another person to make you happy or expecting to be responsible for another person’s happiness is to invite constant disappointment and perhaps resentment when the other person doesn’t match up to expectation. Sometimes people don’t know the source of their own happiness/unhappiness let alone what would make another person happy.
It is possible, on the other hand, to make life easier and richer for your partner. I view a relationship like a form of teamwork, to the outside world you are as a united front. You stick up for your team. You don’t do things that could let down or embarrass the other. You support them in their interests and endeavours, you delight in their happiness and be understanding when they are sad. You build them up, not knock them down.
…but are you responsible for whether or not that person is happy or sad? Nope. You are there to help contribute to their happiness but you are not the source of happiness itself.
August 16th, 2007 at 10:03 am - IP Man-Hash: cfb78268d537a
Alex, why the fuck are you so into hyberboles? Its pretty obvious that the wife’s sole job isnt just to make her man pretty. I am sure most guys respect their wives enough to allow her to be independent, have her fun etc. The problem with today world is that numerous wives dont reciprocate that gesture. They dont respect a man when he helps out, slogs for the family or any of that. Please, be rational and stop thinking every sentence with “I feminist”. It makes everything you say, post and do so radical, extreme and myopic.
Sure they do. Just the fact that men are better and more capable. For example, men and women can both want/dream to be CEOs but its usually who deserves to eat the cake.
August 16th, 2007 at 10:07 am - IP Man-Hash: cfb78268d537a
Of course, again, thats over stretching it? I like my wife to submit when I want her to but to be a mindless drone? Not quite. I think most men here are rational enough to know that there should be a boundary drawn. Like most relationships, its very hard to have 50-50. One party usually has to give more. The women should give in to the guy more often than not because he is the leader of the family, contributes more financially to the family and not doing so would bruise his ego(yes men have huge egos) and cause the marriage to break down(As we often see today).
August 16th, 2007 at 11:42 am - IP Man-Hash: b49936f2bf38b
@ Luka- When I said people should try to make their spouses happy, I was thinking along the lines of doing nice things for your spouse, appreciating and complimenting them, being willing to sometimes make sacrifices for their benefit, supporting them and what makes them happy, etc. I of course believe this should be reciprocal.
@ Mansvoice- I realize what I described was a bit extreme, which is why I said that it only applied if you were to take Ralohcs’s statement literally: “see themselves as nothing more than something to make their man happy.” Women are a great deal more than something to make their husband happy, and should see themselves that way, just like men are a great deal more than something to make their wives happy, and should (and do) see themselves that way. Ralohcs has some pretty extreme views, so I wasn’t sure the extent of which he meant literally what he said.
As for what you described, I agree that wives should appreciate their husband for what he does to support and help the family, and that they should be understanding of what he needs and what makes him happy, etc. Husbands should do the same. And when I said women have a right to ambition, I agree that whoever is determined to be more qualified (without gender bias in either direction), should get the job. My issue was that Ralohcs called women who pursue a career selfish. If they neglect their children, I might agree, but generally I believe they should have equal right to pursue their ambitions.
As for the submitting thing, I would have a problem being in a relationship that wasn’t 50-50, so mine are, and it works for me. Depends on the couple I guess.
August 16th, 2007 at 11:47 am - IP Man-Hash: c84cf03fe9f40
If a woman is raising her kids..and wants a job… she better be able to get a job that allows her to afford daycare.
Then her kids are now being raised by another person while she’s out working… and she then comes home and is too tired cook or clean or look after her kids… is the man supposed to work all day and come home to a mess and have to cook and look after the kids?
What kinda crappy deal is that?
August 16th, 2007 at 12:51 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Nice outlook on life you got there. Read much rand?
Of course, you realize, I hope, I’m being caustically sardonic.
- Atb - Fields of love
August 16th, 2007 at 12:55 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Maybe women can never either be truly happy or wish the happiness of others and you extrapolate on yourself stating that.
Who’s to say?
- ATB - Hold you (vinil club mix)
August 16th, 2007 at 2:21 pm - IP Man-Hash: a13ba81333017
Right, but as she notes I don’t think that’s what she was saying. You’re attacking a straw (wo)man there.
You are only responsible for your own happiness. Expecting another person to make you happy or expecting to be responsible for another person’s happiness
Depressed people (I’m speaking clinically depressed here) are made happier in marriage, relatively speaking, than happier people. (No, I don’t have a citation because I’m lazy. But it was a pretty good peer-reviewed study).
Even if it’s not a very good marriage.
Go figure.
I agree with the rest of what you say, and don’t disagree with your comments on happiness, I just don’t think they were on point.
-wolfe
August 16th, 2007 at 9:52 pm - IP Man-Hash: 52ddc4a390467
Wow…what a bitch you are. So you make a “small effort” so that he will treat you “like a queen”. Do you comprehend how selfish you are? Try to undrstand this: a man’s happiness comes first, and women should feel honored to please a superior male.
P Coderch