Ask Dick: Has Feminism Affected Anything?
Necroswordsman of decayingsword.mabtw.com has sent me the following question.
Hey Dick, I have a question. In most of my life I have wondered how feminists have affected the media. For example, nowadays, a children’s presenter has to be clearly a young guy or they’re branded a pedophile. You get what I mean.
I’d really like some answers.
And I’d really like those barking-dog shock-collars to become the hottest women’s fashion item for 2007. Imagine what a utopia that would be. Every time a woman went to open her mouth, she’d get an electric Five Across the Eyes.
Women are too terrified during a crisis to say anything anyway. What’s the downside? At least this way they’d have an excuse. A sexy excuse.
Thinking back on children’s presenters, a few legends immediately come to mind: Captain Kangaroo, Mr. Wizard, and Mr. Rogers. Unlike any goddamn woman has ever done, these men brought smiles to the faces of millions of children for decades. That makes them a million times better than your average mother. I have a word for these men: legends. Women have a word for these men as well: pedophiles.
Women are so far up their own ass with how fucking great they are, they can’t give one ounce of credit to anyone who has ever done anything fantastic — or should I say mantastic. Women never get any credit for anything in the first place, so who can blame them. You can’t give someone a backwards purple nurple if you don’t know what it is. And it’s not called credit when you get the blame for fucking up, which women get and do constantly. It’s called blame. That’s why it’s actually called blame and not credit. Blame is all women know and that’s why they shoot it out of their mouths all day like broken sprinklers of shit.
But did feminism cause this?
Absolutely not. I was thinking about this while I was writing the above — that’s just the average day in the life of a man: thinking, writing, watching TV, snacking on some cashews, and not listening to someone on the phone all at the same time. I came to the conclusion that feminism has not affected shit in society.
The reason women call men children’s presenters pedophiles is because they’re immature and they think it’s funny.
Women have the emotional maturity of methadone addicts. They think everything in the world is funny. Shit, I make women laugh all the time and I don’t even try; they’re like retarded. You don’t even have to make a joke and they’ll laugh at it. And that includes laughing at the hard work and child rearing programmes put out by these brave men called children’s presenters.
Feminism didn’t make women behave poorly. They’ve been doing that for eons. Feminism just called attention to it.
Related Articles:
March 28th, 2007 at 4:05 pm - IP Man-Hash: b970e8787af34
Dick, the words and phrases with which you write are so harsh. But…but.. it’s all T R U E. Girls do pass blame all day. In fact, every article you write is so unbelievable true, it’s insane that more men aren’t privy to the absolute true annoyance and peril of these walking vaginas and their brigade.
How on earth did we end up this way? Why are men so mawkish for pussy? How are we going to get these menstruating beasts out of the voting booths, out of the corporate offices, out of the universities, and back into the laundry room where they can truly shine?
I swear if I owned a business I would never hire a women. I simply could not bring myself to do it. There is no amount of money you could pay me to hire a woman. I’d rather attach my penis to a car battery. Their beaver-trap brains just can not handle the thought processes needed to avoid danger and process problems. Instead, all they do is incite danger and instantiate problems. In today’s society, you can get sued for even saying you wouldn’t hire a women. And the females and their thought-police would actually win!
Have we lost all decency in our time? Has everyone lost their fucking mind? Is there no way back to the natural order of things? Are we destined to suffer at the whim of these estrogen-beasts and their followers? Please tell me there is hope for a return to decency.
March 28th, 2007 at 4:14 pm - IP Man-Hash: 41d1817bb2e08
Any manpoints lost for googling “backwards purple nurple”? Hope not.
March 28th, 2007 at 4:38 pm - IP Man-Hash: c20b47cbcee08
Of course they did :)
March 28th, 2007 at 6:27 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4a1207b9a8d74
I have a female friend (practically a sister, I’ve known her since kindergarten) who proves this constantly. I make a game of it.
All I have to do is look her square in the eye, straight-faced, and say just about ANY word and she’ll start laughing.
March 29th, 2007 at 1:31 am - IP Man-Hash: 9d1bff40f6840
He didn’t say anything about females down under, so you creamed your jeans for no real reason. Only men can compete with men.
March 29th, 2007 at 4:45 am - IP Man-Hash: 4555637db20cf
I’ve just lost a few man-points. I read that silly line
and I immediately felt like applying My Five Across Her Eyes. Violence against women is abhorrent.
March 29th, 2007 at 7:36 am - IP Man-Hash: 2448b0cfc2f97
I swear if I owned a business I would never hire a women.
Probably quite a few businessmen who would agree with you. Especially when you are talking about areas where high commitment is required or where efficiency is important. But guess what? You don’t have that choice. If you’re not meeting the quotas for male-to-female ratios - heaven forbid, you’re employing only men - you will be fined and life/business will be made hard for you.
From the Angry Harry blog quoting Fred Reed, “The Equality Scam”:
Full article here: http://www.fredoneverything.net/WomenandAfAc.shtml
Of course, as women become dominant in professions, corporations and academia (because it’s always a “boy’s club” unless women are at least dominant), they are the ones that will have female-only recruitment policies. Neither the “de-patriarchalised” courts (read zero-justice) nor the feminist Governments are going to give a shit either.
March 29th, 2007 at 7:46 am - IP Man-Hash: dc4b477cfd13b
They’ll be out of the voting booths the next time your government collapses. Here in the USA, it’s getting closer every day.
Again, when your government that empowers them collapses. Here in the USA, it’s probably inside of ten years, but the current monetization of the Iraq War debt and subsequent runaway inflation brings the Big Crunch ever closer, ever faster.
Yes.
Again, it’s government that empowers them, and that’s becoming a more and more temporary situation every day.
Depends what happens after the Big Crunch. If we insist on instituting yet another fascist/socialist government with unlimited powers as we have now, then yes, it’s going to be problematic. If we go for something that has powers that are so limited that it can’t even coin money and killing elected officials and their staff is legal for any reason, then maybe we have a chance.
March 29th, 2007 at 7:59 am - IP Man-Hash: 35a3bf5e9bc19
I stand corrected Dick. It’s just women’s fault, not feminists. Stupid to think feminists actually do things.
Just get rid of George Bush and it will improve.
March 29th, 2007 at 8:00 am - IP Man-Hash: 35a3bf5e9bc19
Actually, a mistake. Feminists actually do something. Bitch.
March 29th, 2007 at 8:06 am - IP Man-Hash: 2448b0cfc2f97
Dakota Smith, I would not be so sure about Patriarchal Socialist Government or the US Government collapsing. Nor do I see a “Big Crunch” in the next 10 years. The economic means for a total collapse are not there. Yes, the economy is becoming more global, but a catastrophic collapse? No. More likely you’ll have a minor recession as we’ve had in the past.
None of the economists are predicting a US (and consequentally, worldwide?) collapse in the next decade, and quite frankly, there is no way I see it happening either.
March 29th, 2007 at 8:08 am - IP Man-Hash: 35a3bf5e9bc19
It would be an implosion if you will. It’s own foundations would crumble ‘and Jill came tumbling after…’
March 29th, 2007 at 8:09 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Again with the puerile libertine libertarianism dreams, Dakota? Government isn’t inherently evil. It’s just your who’s in your government who’s inherently evil.
Who will print the money? Ma and pa? Microsoft? Enron? Who, may I ask (in my misguided impudence)?
Will you print them yourself just before you go shopping?
March 29th, 2007 at 8:12 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Anon, just pray trading in Euros doesn’t pick up with more OPEC members or the Saudis. Lest the money tree shrivels up all of a sudden.
March 29th, 2007 at 8:14 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
You CANNOT have a viable national economy without government. You can’t have any economy or trade without at least local government.
To think otherwise is foolhardy and delusional.
March 29th, 2007 at 8:24 am - IP Man-Hash: 2448b0cfc2f97
It would be an implosion if you will. It’s own foundations would crumble ‘and Jill came tumbling after…’
Again I don’t see this as a means for collapsing an economy. Single-motherhood and family breakdown have been part of Western life for a number of decades now and, on the whole, society continues to work. It’s certainly not “crumbling”.
Thanks, sonyad, for pointing out the lack of any concreteness in what DS is saying. Yes, Patriarchal Government are the ones “empowering” women (often with men’s taxes), Patriarchal Government, having usurped men’s providing role is quite anti-male nowadays, but let’s look at the economics of it sensibly.
March 29th, 2007 at 10:33 am - IP Man-Hash: dc4b477cfd13b
Again with the peurile socio-fascim dreams, sonyad?
Power corrupts. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. This is as true today as it was in Lord Acton’s time. Failure to understand this one simple fact is the sole cause of tyranny in the world.
Anyone who likes and can convince buyer customer that there is something real backing it.
Nope, no doubt some system will be agreed-apon by the market and I’ll use whatever it happens to be.
Incorrect: all that government does is interfere with free trade among individuals through regulation and theft.
Government theft at all levels in the US inflates shelf prices of every good and service on the market by at least 800% while simultaneously stealing at least 50% of every individual’s income — and that’s not even counting the incredible inflation caused by government in just the last couple of years, which devalues the currency to nearly the point of worthlessness.
No private system could operate that way because it would drive away its customers. The reason government can get away with it is because we have no choice.
Explain the black market in drugs, then. It operates totally outside the sanction of government.
It’s certainly true that government helps the drug trade through prohibition. Without prohibition, most drugs (like everything else) would be damned near free to the consumer.
March 29th, 2007 at 10:36 am - IP Man-Hash: 6545d23cd19c2
I do dislike how my taxes go towards paying for a single mom to drink beer and smoke while yer 8 kids from 8 fathers sit in their own feces.
I wish I could direct where my money goes.
I’d put it all into R&D research.
March 29th, 2007 at 10:38 am - IP Man-Hash: dc4b477cfd13b
In a free market, you can. Only government forces you to pay for things you don’t like or never use.
March 29th, 2007 at 10:41 am - IP Man-Hash: 4d18bb7f039b0
The US is a dying beast. It’s easy to say “well families are all fucked up but most people still have jobs”.
Jobs mean nothing at this point in the great Empire’s fall. Jobs are the last thing to go. Civility, faith and family are the first. Eventually when the great parasites suck those out for long enough that the honorable men powering this country realize they’ve been made fools and cuckolds and start not giving a fuck. Then comes civil war or violent religious rebirth. Either one sounds like very fun living conditions for the cunts who did this.