Ask Dick: Has Feminism Affected Anything?

Necroswordsman of decayingsword.mabtw.com has sent me the following question.

Hey Dick, I have a question. In most of my life I have wondered how feminists have affected the media. For example, nowadays, a children’s presenter has to be clearly a young guy or they’re branded a pedophile. You get what I mean.

I’d really like some answers.

And I’d really like those barking-dog shock-collars to become the hottest women’s fashion item for 2007. Imagine what a utopia that would be. Every time a woman went to open her mouth, she’d get an electric Five Across the Eyes.

Women are too terrified during a crisis to say anything anyway. What’s the downside? At least this way they’d have an excuse. A sexy excuse.

Thinking back on children’s presenters, a few legends immediately come to mind: Captain Kangaroo, Mr. Wizard, and Mr. Rogers. Unlike any goddamn woman has ever done, these men brought smiles to the faces of millions of children for decades. That makes them a million times better than your average mother. I have a word for these men: legends. Women have a word for these men as well: pedophiles.

Women are so far up their own ass with how fucking great they are, they can’t give one ounce of credit to anyone who has ever done anything fantastic — or should I say mantastic. Women never get any credit for anything in the first place, so who can blame them. You can’t give someone a backwards purple nurple if you don’t know what it is. And it’s not called credit when you get the blame for fucking up, which women get and do constantly. It’s called blame. That’s why it’s actually called blame and not credit. Blame is all women know and that’s why they shoot it out of their mouths all day like broken sprinklers of shit.

But did feminism cause this?

Absolutely not. I was thinking about this while I was writing the above — that’s just the average day in the life of a man: thinking, writing, watching TV, snacking on some cashews, and not listening to someone on the phone all at the same time. I came to the conclusion that feminism has not affected shit in society.

The reason women call men children’s presenters pedophiles is because they’re immature and they think it’s funny.

Women have the emotional maturity of methadone addicts. They think everything in the world is funny. Shit, I make women laugh all the time and I don’t even try; they’re like retarded. You don’t even have to make a joke and they’ll laugh at it. And that includes laughing at the hard work and child rearing programmes put out by these brave men called children’s presenters.

Feminism didn’t make women behave poorly. They’ve been doing that for eons. Feminism just called attention to it.

Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

115 Comments in 101 threads.»

Pages: [6] 5 4 3 2 1 » Show All

Comment by Wisdom
2008-04-12 17:22:00 - IP Man-Hash: 56cd7d82603b9

Just go suck your dad’s cock and be glad you are a real man!
Men with men rock!

 
Comment by Purba
2008-02-15 12:36:58 - IP Man-Hash: 93a3b988c9b2b

Men- I must apologise for being wordy- its’ merely exemplary of the vast superiority of our male mind. I aim to incontrovertibly put feminists back in their place.
We men are much like the origin of all of our proverbs “the knowledge of many condensed by the wit of one”. so we usually opt for as few words as necessary.

Unfortunately, as per the simpleton, for feminists- it takes a long while for facts to sink in.

Fact:
Feminism has NOT constructively helped any women aside from its’ own incestuous, back-patting, intellectual masturbatory demographic: white, over-privileged, non economically viable, unattractive, overweight and androgenically imbalanced.

Males and their tireless, selfless, knowledge-seeking minds & inventions have done more to assist women than any feminist could dare dream.
Feminism has not lifted women out of poverty, provided health & nutrition, medicine nor pharmacy, safe childbirth, immunized their children, made safe drinking water, basic hygiene, contraception and reproductive choice, removed them from violence, abuse, slavery or real degradation (as opposed to imagined- as per the damaged psyche of the bloated feminist dogmatic/diatribist), labour-saving machinery nor anything remotely useful.

Thus, Feminists hate us men because: MEN HAVE HELPED WOMEN MORE THAN FEMINISM/FEMINISTS: more concretely, more intellectually and more economically than anything associated with feminism.

Their emotive anti-male vitriol (bereft of fact, reason or research) is merely a primitive psychological reaction- the outward projection of hostility due to deep-rooted self-hatred and inferiority-complexes.

Plato’s time-less wisdom best describes Feminism: “As empty vessels make the loudest sound, so they that have the least wit are the greatest blabbers.”

Say it loud, say it proud- “men HELP women more than feminists help women, so femmos hate us men”.
Truth hurts, hey femmos?

Comment by John_Petrucci
2008-09-07 18:52:20 - IP Man-Hash: 05de0fd3c213a

How have men helped women? I mean, sure, they’ve done SOME things for them- but mostly. all I hear is men talking shit about women and they bitch about how their lives suck with women about half the time.

Comment by Arbalest
2008-09-07 19:19:14 - IP Man-Hash: 688d46c40d9d4

Actually, contrary to popular belief, women have always been protected by society. You didn’t see women help building the pyramid did you? Or the draft, until recently in history men were always expected to fight and die for the society while the women stayed at home. Even in a hostle takeover women will get treated better, being left alive for other reasons while the men are outright killed trying to protect their families. Even in Egypt, the queen was allowed to choose who became Pharoh by marrying her. Even now, we have male feminist who would punish their own gender because they believe that”women are oppressed” myth. Men are much more caring towards women than the other way around.

Comment by John_Petrucci
2008-09-07 19:24:39 - IP Man-Hash: 05de0fd3c213a

They only got treated better because they were believed to be weaker than their actual potential. Women were basically oppressed, and no, I’m no feminist, but even nowadays, there’s still that 1800’s thing going on…where women are still thought upon as being ‘weak’ and ‘insignificant’ human beings, or not even.

(Comments won't nest below this level)
Comment by Arbalest
2008-09-07 19:40:23 - IP Man-Hash: 688d46c40d9d4

There’s a difference between opression and repression.

Opression is like slavery. or the holocaust. Or the KKK.

Being held back in fear you’ll get hurt is not opression but repression, similar to snatching a baby’s hand from a turned on oven.

And these days, the ones going on about how weak women are are usually the women themselves. The lazy ones using a crutch to blame their weaknesses on. Ladies have no use for such things and men have no problem respecting these ladies who actually prove themselves. Go into the forum and there’s Victorian Lady who’s treated like a saint. That’s a example of a lady, much different then the girls relying on their crutches.

 
Comment by John_Petrucci
2008-09-07 19:48:59 - IP Man-Hash: 05de0fd3c213a

But see, that’s only those women. There are other women out there who want to be seen as an equal- some show it in a way that’s totally WRONG, like, let’s just say, Hilary Clinton- but the actual women who go into work everyday and do their job as a businesswoman or something along those lines are the ones who should be respected more than they are, and for that reason.

 
Comment by Arbalest
2008-09-07 20:01:28 - IP Man-Hash: 688d46c40d9d4

Sorry, but Hillarry Clinton is not a good example. I’ve read into her history and she’s about the worst example you can get. Nothing about Hillary is about equality.

And those women usually ARE respected one way or another. For every man there to put her down there will be another one there to defend her. Or she could call on the harrassment laws every business follow. Women are given much more respect than men in that regard.Hell, you yourself are a example of it. You saw women being critized and jumped to defend them.

 
Comment by thisisstupid
2008-09-07 20:07:40 - IP Man-Hash: 3a62a6072de9d

And Arblast is a Dick-fan, I’m guessing??
Hey this one is for you, bitch,

8===>

 
Comment by John_Petrucci
2008-09-07 20:12:57 - IP Man-Hash: 05de0fd3c213a

Yeah, I know Hilary’s not a good example. That’s why I said that she was trying to earn respect the wrong way.

I guess so. But it just seems to me like men don’t give too much respect to women, and they seem like they make fun of them as if they were stupid, insipid dogs. And that bothers me, I wish those men would just realize how much potential there really IS in a woman. Those few don’t realize it because they’re blinded by the “great achievements that men have already made.” And yeah, men have done a good job when it comes to that. But women were never really given the chance to change the world. Because men looked down upon the mere THOUGHT of it! It just bother me. That’s all.

 
Comment by thisisstupid
2008-09-07 20:17:12 - IP Man-Hash: 3a62a6072de9d

To Arbalest:
8====>
we know you <3 them, sweetie.

 
Comment by Arbalest
2008-09-07 20:27:22 - IP Man-Hash: 688d46c40d9d4

Understandable but I know a lot of men who respect women even when they don’t deserve it. I’ve seen women who are a LOT more sexist than dick is. The thing is that while people like you oppose Dick( which is understandable) I’ve looked into feminism and found things that make Dick look like a saint and people say nothing. The men don’t get it and the women don’t care. But I figure we’re on the same page so I’ll leave you alone.

http://antimisandry.com/ That site can provide more info than I can and they don’t have Dick’s bluntness.

http://profile.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=user.viewprofile&frien dID=146143641

And this guy here has a blog which you can look into for other things wrong with the whole feminism thing.

http://www.angryharry.com/ And a blog from britian doing something similar.

There are a lot of biased people and I’ld hate for one sexist to excape judgement over another because of gender. But again we’re already on the same page I believe so I’ll wish you a good whatever time of day it is for you.

 
Comment by thisisstupid
2008-09-07 20:32:05 - IP Man-Hash: 3a62a6072de9d

Uh, I hate feminist. And I’m a girl. They try to turn all women into dykes.

And I LIKE wearing tight fitting clothing that makes guys wanna poke my ass!! And if they do, then i get to tell Leo and he gets to kick ass!!
BWUHAHAHAHA!
Go to hell.

 
 
 
 
 
Comment by Billy
2008-01-24 01:53:19 - IP Man-Hash: df8a37f402a4d

Billy said:

Dumchick said:

So is this website like a little treehouse club with a cute little painted sign that says No Girls Allowed? You may think this makes you look really manly and macho, because only a real man would be so misogynistic (oh I’m sorry, I should probably use smaller words for a keg sucking frat boy like yourself), but in reality, you just look like little boy who’s too afraid of women to be able to appreciate strength and intelligence. Have fun with your insecurity and your own hand.

oops..
Why is everything to do about sex with these little girls? hoes

 
Comment by Billy
2008-01-24 01:47:36 - IP Man-Hash: df8a37f402a4d

Domchick said:

Female, you have been told that this is a strictly “no women” site? There are plenty of feminists websites where your views would be welcome. I think you’ll agree that you’re just diverting/hijacking a good manly discussion.

Men, ignore the female and continue where we left off before the interruption.

I agree with Frederick, this talk of an Islamic invasion of Europe is utter non-sense. These people may be of Islamic origin, but their religious beliefs and practices will die out just as other religions have. Islamic influx and subsequent secularisation more like.

So is this website like a little treehouse club with a cute little painted sign that says No Girls Allowed? You may think this makes you look really manly and macho, because only a real man would be so misogynistic (oh I’m sorry, I should probably use smaller words for a keg sucking frat boy like yourself), but in reality, you just look like little boy who’s too afraid of women to be able to appreciate strength and intelligence. Have fun with your insecurity and your own hand.Why is everything to do about sex with these little girls? hobag

 
Comment by MansVoice
2008-01-23 23:46:17 - IP Man-Hash: 7b55501cead9a

who’s too afraid of women to be able to appreciate strength and intelligence

I haven’t met any woman smarter or more capable than myself.

I say you are afraid of real men. Fuck off feminist cunt.

Comment by John_Petrucci
2008-09-07 20:24:41 - IP Man-Hash: 05de0fd3c213a

ORLY? Maybe you’re just too vain to realize that there are ACTUALLY women out there smarter than you?

 
 
Comment by detached
2008-01-23 19:24:32 - IP Man-Hash: c3f4479460146

I’d rather jack off with sandpaper than be with a chick like “domchick”. I’m sure you’re hot…fatty.

 
Comment by Domchick
2008-01-23 15:56:42 - IP Man-Hash: 7883c4f2b5c56

Anonymous said:

Female, you have been told that this is a strictly “no women” site? There are plenty of feminists websites where your views would be welcome. I think you’ll agree that you’re just diverting/hijacking a good manly discussion.

Men, ignore the female and continue where we left off before the interruption.

I agree with Frederick, this talk of an Islamic invasion of Europe is utter non-sense. These people may be of Islamic origin, but their religious beliefs and practices will die out just as other religions have. Islamic influx and subsequent secularisation more like.

So is this website like a little treehouse club with a cute little painted sign that says No Girls Allowed? You may think this makes you look really manly and macho, because only a real man would be so misogynistic (oh I’m sorry, I should probably use smaller words for a keg sucking frat boy like yourself), but in reality, you just look like little boy who’s too afraid of women to be able to appreciate strength and intelligence. Have fun with your insecurity and your own hand.

 
Comment by Cunt Puncher
2008-01-21 04:23:08 - IP Man-Hash: aa871a3792e9a

Anonymous said:

Female, you have been told that this is a strictly “no women” site? There are plenty of feminists websites where your views would be welcome. I think you’ll agree that you’re just diverting/hijacking a good manly discussion.

Men, ignore the female and continue where we left off before the interruption.

I agree with Frederick, this talk of an Islamic invasion of Europe is utter non-sense. These people may be of Islamic origin, but their religious beliefs and practices will die out just as other religions have. Islamic influx and subsequent secularisation more like.

OK fucktard, and the difference between the two is…………………..Bzzzzzzzzzzzz……….time’s up, CUNT.

 
Comment by MansVoice
2008-01-03 02:48:09 - IP Man-Hash: 2e9f52b62c482

Trolling for cock?

Bugger off, feminist slut. Go play your mind games in your pseudo “intellectual” forums - HAHAHAHHA.

 
Comment by The WISE ONE
2008-01-03 01:53:34 - IP Man-Hash: 38a7212c8ff33

OH LORDY.
YOU MEN ARE DISGUSTING.
HAHA.
:]
GET A LIFE.
I WRITE THAT, DUE TO IT BEING EVIDENT THAT ANY BRITTLE ATTEMPT YOU MAY HAVE MADE TO GET ONE HAS NOT WORKED.
-CARO, THE FEMINIST.
NOW SUCK MY INVISIBLE DICK[BECAUSE I KNOW YOU'RE ALL GAY.]

Comment by Elitist_Prick
2008-08-19 14:03:59 - IP Man-Hash: 81f420217d258

Typical woman penis envy.

 
 
Comment by Clair
2007-12-02 04:06:01 - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6

…okay…

 
Comment by Mark
2007-12-02 02:44:29 - IP Man-Hash: 2998d637ad7de

Clair said:

ya know…I wasn’t being mean. You’re just being stupid, because you don’t know me. So how can you come to conclusions like that?

Because you’re stupid.

 
Comment by Clair
2007-12-02 01:57:44 - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6

ya know…I wasn’t being mean. You’re just being stupid, because you don’t know me. So how can you come to conclusions like that?

 
Comment by Billy
2007-12-02 01:17:09 - IP Man-Hash: cf5569ce44177

Clair said:

Dick makes girls laugh? You know who kinda reminds me of Dick? You know the film clip for Barbie Girl? Well he reminds me of Ken in it, and Barbie reminds me of everything Dick bitches about women. Just an observation.

And you remind me of the song by Pink called - Stupid Girl

 
Comment by Clair
2007-12-01 23:14:47 - IP Man-Hash: f68191fe56ea6

Dick makes girls laugh? You know who kinda reminds me of Dick? You know the film clip for Barbie Girl? Well he reminds me of Ken in it, and Barbie reminds me of everything Dick bitches about women. Just an observation.

 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-11-19 07:48:40 - IP Man-Hash: 422940479a69d

P Coderch said:

The real question that this guy shouls have asked is: is there anything that feminism has NOT affected - negatively, of course.

P Coderch

I was more wondering about just child presenters, and it’s easier to blame feminists than women, since feminists -are- all crazy bitches.

Good times. Where does the innocence go.

 
Comment by P Coderch
2007-08-10 15:30:40 - IP Man-Hash: 52ddc4a390467

The real question that this guy shouls have asked is: is there anything that feminism has NOT affected - negatively, of course.

P Coderch

 
Comment by P Coderch
2007-08-10 15:09:25 - IP Man-Hash: 52ddc4a390467

sonyad said:

Wolfe. You purposefully eschew the point.

What are you gonna do? Use GE Capital Bonds at Metro Cash & Carry or WalMart in Backwater, Flyover Country to buy a Gillette razor like the cheap (likely Chinese countermade) sharp little fucker I use?

Just invoke the infallibility of the market whenever you’re in trouble? People are really overdoing the ‘invisible hand’ thing. It’s getting a tad old.

Human beings are not 128 bit precision floating point data processors with a single decision threshold but with unpredictable and wildly varying intervals (in time and from individual to individual) of decision threshold.

You wouldn’t believe what people are willing to pay for stuff if put on the spot as was the case through price raising orchestrated between all our domestic concrete manufacturers last year.

Sometimes going without or moving your business elsewhere is NOT an option, unlike in Dakota’s pixie fairy economic fantasies. And last year was but another in the recent building boom across the country.

It was still cheaper than importing the stuff, to be sure. But really not by all that much at all, despite their much lower production costs.

In the real world, the one we live in, these are called cartel policies and are not that uncommon by a long shot. Yet another roadtrain one can leisurely drive through the holes in Dakota’s argument.

Obviously, the state, more specifically the Office of Fair Trading, intervened with lawsuits. Some resolved to mediocre fines likely to be refunded on successful appeal (one such fined manufacturer already has had their fine refunded and is free to charge whatever it wants) with perhaps some state compensations to boot for the ordeal.

Corruption inquiries are now pending into how the OFT orchestrated the case. Word is massive kickbacks to the wife of the president of the OFT were in order for the case to be botched. The president of the OFT himself already seems to have surreptitiously concluded a 30 day notice for a resignation the devil and he only must have known about. Out of the blue and for no apparent reason. Certainly totally unconnected to the case.

Seems corruption is better business indeed.

And this is but a single concrete example among many of the market failing despite state and government (through corruption thereof), not because of them.

Dakota will now perhaps argue one or both of the following:

1. Fair trade is whatever the buyers and sellers themselves alone agree upon. Even if it is really just the sellers agreeing amongst themselves what to uniformly charge for an indispensable or indispensable exceptionally (such as concrete in a building boom) product the buyers crave(concrete has to be poured continuously from foundation to penthouse and roof or you can piss it all good bye if it dries in batches or levels).

The sellers should have the right to charge you whatever exorbitant prices they well please to convene upon for their product s despite the fact they could never afford to do so without a concerted effort working perpendicularly with competition.

Cartel policies are not a failure, he’ll say. It’s just the glory of capitalism at work.

2. Without the state this would never have happened in the first place or would never have been as severe. It would certainly not be endemic to the market.
___
Both contentions being utter poppycock, of course. I suspect he’ll refrain from contending these contentions lest alone he adhere to my prediction.

Libertarianism is utter nonsense. If Dakota had saved any room at all for reason on the matter he’d likewise see this for the truth it is.

Guess irrationality is not exclusive gender after all.

Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha…Sonyad having a Marxist meltdown. Priceless…

P Coderch

 
Comment by sonyad
2007-04-01 02:42:34 - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7

I just realised something. There’s just one senator Clinton.
That was low. But not incongruous your general right eye challenged outlook on politics.

Wolfe, the existence of GE Capital Bonds and the like does not negate the dollar’s existence, role or importance now does it? Nor can I see it take the place of the dollar in the eventuality of a descent into anarchy. Or indeed be worth anything at all. Do you?

It seems to me you’re acutely biased (to the right). You actually enjoy entertaining the pipe dream of a social philosophy that is leberwurstianism (an atrocious one, if you just take the time to thought experiment with it even a little) though you have enough sense to stop short of proselytising its enactment.

Or, more precisely, the abolishment of government in favour of anarchy.

Better dread the ‘privatised’ governments that would inevitably emerge out of anarchy.

- ALIZEE - Jen ai marre

Comment by John
2008-08-02 12:22:03 - IP Man-Hash: 571a53d0ad583

I prefer Alizee - Moi Lolita

Wow.

 
 
Comment by Necroswordsman
2007-03-31 14:26:21 - IP Man-Hash: 35a3bf5e9bc19

sonyad said:
As long as discussion is respectful and pertinent to the topic/off topic subtopic at hand you’re likely to find most members can be amenable.

Not to mention having proper grammar and spelling helps. Along with not holding down the caps button and looking like a complete retard.

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis