{{women are cruel and vain and look at men as atm machines}}
And that’s what you wanted to be? God made you a man for a reason. Changing your gender is your way of saying He(God) didn’t know what he was doing! How dare you!! Actually,Truthfully I feel sad for you, because the pride that once hung from your crotch area is gone forever. What a waste.

MEN DO.

Cute try though sweety.

This article is great, and so are all the others!

wolfe said:

maxime said:
you are abviously lost in your gender divisions which you base upon who can identify, seperate and protect male privielge most firecely.

The greatest male privilege is the privilege of spelling correctly.

You leak into the area of Equality now, (like women really know what they want). Let them have it, let them have it. Case in point: one guy I know works at mill where they’ve experience some H.R. phenomena in that a ’shemale’, morphidite head case has required the addition of a ’special restroom’. Special Ed is not required to figure out that this hormone-injected, mutated little creature will never have the bone structure to do the lifting required for her position. Alas, no leverage-only w/ the government, who just denied some guy who lost his hand anything at all so ’she-a-pet’ can skid through!
What the world coming to?

Leaving that remark aside, male privilege:
- to die years younger.
- to be much smarter, and harder working, but only earn 33% more.
- to be rooked on social security, getting $0.37 out for every dollar women get out.
- to be drafted
- to be the number one victims of violence
- the number 1 victims of gender violence
- yet endlessly falsely accused of rape and DV, especially in custody disputes
- to have the deck stacked totally against them in custody and family courts.

Yes… please tell me more of this male ‘privilege’.

-wolfe

KL said:

stupid fags

http://singleabroad.com

Textbook example of your ungrateful, dull western girly-girl. I assure you she is above knowledge of any field, just look at her postings. She’s too stupid to even begin to comprehend what humor is – she’s almost subhuman. I suppose relying on your body as a substitute for your character does that to you. She’ll never know what it feels like to be respected like Teddy Roosevelt, to actually contribute something worth meaning as opposed to being a social parasite.
Shame.

Cottag said:

So, according to Dick, men are much better at sucking cock than women?

This site is um, interesting. I had no idea there were so many of you Manly Gay Men out there who are so obsessed with women that you would dedicate an entire site to it!

You make no sense

This site is um, interesting. I had no idea there were so many of you Manly Gay Men out there who are so obsessed with women that you would dedicate an entire site to it!

Suffice to say, though, that I agree with the premise that someone who works hard at a job is more likely to succeed than a somewhat more intelligent (or better connected) person who doesn’t.
-wolfe

Maybe this was true way back but affirmative action has ruined that for many. Kuntz rule.

abaddon_fff said:
@wolfe:
The only problem that I have with your argument, is that you equate the level of stupidity with the level of education.
-Strength and Honor-

To be clear, level of intellect has only a loose correlation with level of education. It is not feasible to be a moron and have a PhD from a reputable university; it is certainly feasible to be of mediocre intellect and have a PhD, or a brilliant genius and have no degree.

The statement that I think confused matters was:

IQ scores of 125, for example, a level said to correspond with people getting first-class degrees.

I agree; it’s poorly written. My only defense is that I quoted it; a poor defense. What that statement means to me is… “a level said to correspond with people generally capable of getting first class degrees.” And that’s all I intended.

Bob said:

It is amusing that you should mention this – my neighbour is currently reading a management/psychology book that shows (with numbers) that how good someone is at their job, and how far they’ve gone is completely unrelated to IQ (past a certain barrier level of say 120 for scientists). On the other hand, it’s very much related to how much time a person puts into work.

Common sense really!

I’m actually skeptical of that book. After all, a coloring book, with paint by numbers shows (with numbers!) how to paint pictures. That doesn’t make it an authority. Much of what’s been written on the subject of IQ (on either side) is rubbish.

Suffice to say, though, that I agree with the premise that someone who works hard at a job is more likely to succeed than a somewhat more intelligent (or better connected) person who doesn’t.
-wolfe

abaddon_fff said:

@wolfe:
The only problem that I have with your argument, is that you equate the level of stupidity with the level of education.
-Strength and Honor-

Actually, I think you’re misreading something I quoted, though I agree it’s not terribly clear. To be clear, level of intellect has only a loose correlation with level of education. It is not feasible to be a moron and have a PhD; it is certainly feasible to be of mediocre intellect and have a PhD, or a brilliant genius and have no degree.

The statement that I think confused matters was:

Common sense really!

abaddon_fff said:

@wolfe:
The only problem that I have with your argument, is that you equate the level of stupidity with the level of education.
-Strength and Honor-

I agree with abaddon. Too many women are ignorant airheads who think a college degree makes you honest. Quite the opposite.