Women’s Vaginas Are Puke City
I’m going to talk about Britney Spears’ stupid vagina today even though I don’t see anything newsworthy or remotely interesting about what’s happened.
In that case, I’m going to use my man ability to turn something stupid and dull into something of value. Have you ever seen some homeless weirdo on the beach paint beautiful pictures out of chalk and trashcans? Or some other man and some fire turn a bunch of wood into more fire? That’s what I’m talking about.
Men are better than women because penises are better than vaginas.
Here’s why I don’t give even half a damn about Britney Spears and her precious fucking vagina.
Item 1: A female celebrity took some whorish pictures.
So has every woman. Browse MySpace for about five seconds for proof of that, or better yet just go take some random pictures of naked women. Why do you think photographers get laid so much? Women love that compromising manner of shit.
Item 2: A recently divorced woman took some whorish pictures.
Women are so completely incapable of affecting the world around them the only way they can try to hurt anyone (including an ex-husband) is by hurting themselves. Have you heard of bulimia? A lot of men haven’t because it’s a stupid problem and men don’t waste their time on stupid bullshit. Bulimia is the condition in which some poor fucking princess tries to get back at the world by abusing herself alone in the dark. What a waste of time!
Item 3: Vaginas are gross.
I’ve heard about Britney Spears and her fucking vagina pictures from three separate women today, who were each frothing at the mouth like rabid turkeys and flapping their giblets in such fervor I thought something gross was going to pop off of something else gross.
And so did they.
Women are gross and have cooties and they know it. That’s why they’re all so fucking excited about Britney Spears and her vagina and her smiley face caesarian scar. It’s like women all over the world are walking around this week wearing T-shirts that say “Vaginas Are” on the front part and then “Gross!” in big fuck off capital letters on the back.
Well you know what, for once women are right.
Men and their penises are featured not only in historic statues of artistic fame and incalculable worth, but also in comedies like Something About Mary and the advertisements for Deuce Bigolo 2. The man fact of the world is that penises have been bringing laughter and wonderment to the world for hundreds of thousands of years.
The only thing vaginas have ever done is ruined tasteful photos.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 13 … 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 [4] 3 2 1 » Show All
@Chivalrous Ugh. I can see why you’re depressed (yes I know it’s medical not just attitude).
Clean water is an energy problem. If we have enough cheap energy, clean water isn’t an issue. If we don’t? Well, we’ll be fine in most of North America, but the rest of the world may not be.
As for overpopulation, it’s really a third world problem, not a US/Britain/Can/Aus/NZ/European/Japanese problem. Of all those countries, I believe only the US is barely reproducing itself. Barely. At about 2.1 babies per couple. Parts of Europe and Japan are down to about 1.0. Japan is already entering a population death spiral.
That doesn’t mean it isn’t a problem that has to be addressed globally, but to argue that North Americans shouldn’t have kids because of the overpopulation problem is … a curious reading of the problem and a curious reach for solution.
On land prices? Well, it’s many factors. You can still get quite cheap land, depending on where you want to live. Check out places like Idaho, Montana. You want to live near a big city? Trickier. But your grandparents buying big tracts of land didn’t have that privilege either, generally. Sure, they lived close for today’s modern cars and roads. But back then most such roads weren’t paved and cars were a lot less reliable.
I used to. I’m a little more jaundiced now, as I suspect most of us are.
Wish I could say things that’d make you feel better. I urge you to spruce up and go to the party. Who cares what women think?
-wolfe
chiv·al·rous (shvl-rs)
adj.
1. Having the qualities of gallantry and honor attributed to an ideal knight.
2. Of or relating to chivalry.
3. Characterized by consideration and courtesy, especially toward women.
Are you stupid?
Why choose such an unbefitting ‘name’?
[don't give up, i'm sure those blueballs of yours are quite something...]
Wow, I guess I have some catching up to do…
To Wolfe:
I might have mentioned in my other posts -
I don’t want kids, I happen to hate kids.
I think the world is terribly overpopulated. I want a return to beautiful, large land plots for reasonable prices amongst other things (Like our parents and gparents got) — that ain’t gonna happen with everyone having fucking worthless brats that we won’t even have clean water for in 75 years….
To homosexuals:
Dudes, no disrespect but I do not get it!
I have gone 7 years without a date, a kiss, a drunken makeout, not even hand holding. I have not talked to a single woman outside my job in 7 years. I am 36, I have NEVER wanted to kiss/do anything with a dude whatsoever. It just isn’t my thing. Of course, I beat off like a madman dreaming of amazing babes, but that is none of your business…. :)
To anyone:
Yes, I believe in slightly old fashioned romantic love (like I wish more of you would) but I would not say I favor a total return to ManWork/WomanHomeKidsEtc.
The Thing with me is, I believe(d?) in women. I really did, for a verrry long time. It hurts to give that up, ya know?
I am blowing off my company Christmas party tomorrow because I feel so inferior around hot chicks. I don’t feel that way about myself,
FUCKING GODDAMNED WHORES made me feel that way when I’m in public because of 23 really painful, blueballed years. heehee.
P.S.
Go Dick - Fuck off whores.
another anti gay woman. Dick has an article on that, check it out.
Jesus. I’d just like to point out that she is a different Alex.
Okay, first I thought you were crazy…but now I see I was SO wrong. You’re gay! And a loser! Wow…thanks for clearing that up, Dick. Jeez, for a second there I couldn’t fathom what kind of guy would write this shit. Very confusing. But I get it now. Thanks again.
Mistaking the fact that I may be occasionally polite for humility is an error few make twice.
And guess what, neither do I. Reading comprehension, dear fellow. Once again you demonstrate your pathetic lack of an intellect.
A real man defers to another real man that clearly knows more than he does. Or he lives alone, outside society. There’s nothing wrong with either path, but if you’re going to behave like a stupid, arrogant ass to everyone and attempt to live in society while flaunting your ignorance, people are going to inevitably note your attitudinal resemblance to Britney Spears.
Interesting projection you’ve got going there, Missy.
By your behavior, you’ve forfeited the right to be treated by me as a man. If you’re lucky and careful, you won’t destroy yourself with everyone else here, but I’d advise a long hard look in the mirror at your attitude, arrogance and profound wilful ignorance.
Now fuck off the site, you sneering, simpering little teenybopper.
-wolfe
wolfe: Well, please keep in mind that’s not for all of us.
How womanly of you.
Impressive. Your thoughts on what others want are almost as accurate as a woman’s.
You’ve certainly got the intolerance, ignorance and rudeness to be a woman or a gay activist.
-wolfe
The father of a cunt has spoken! You see, the difference between me and you is that I’m not humble. I don’t think that the definition of a “real” men as one who serves women like lap dogs and dies for them is that great. I don’t equate chivalry with being a real man, because real men don’t defer to anyone and are not humble towards the weak - and women are weak. You’re pathetic. You daughter will end up giving blow jobs to indigents at an ally for having such a pussy for a dad.
P Coderch
Also noteworthy is that all historically attested incarnations of communism/socialism, for being communist/socialist and all, were quite far from anarchy.
So basically, libertarianism would actually premiere in anarchism. Isn’t that nice? A sole, measly merit.
Merit?
What has being an anarchist, or rather a wishful anarchist, got to do with being either a ‘commy’ or a ‘rapacious capitalist’? Sure, in a true anarchy, what libertarians unwisely connive towards, any form of economy above basic, highly localised barter (highly susceptible to coertion, mind you - this is not sterile theories 101 lalaland) would be conspicuous by its absence. Economies would break down. International trade would cease. Peoples would starve and plagues would decimate with complete freedom. Genocides of a new and exciting amplitude and other neat, fun stuff would occur.
You have misconstrued me. There’s somewhat of a confusion here. People think that anarchism directly and solely implies socialism or/and viceversa. As in a bijective relationship, of sorts. Untrue. One is a form of government, or rather ungovernment, and the other is a type of economy, the free market economy. Government and economy go hand in hand, btw. You can’t really have either without the other. This is what libertarians fail to grasp.
The libertarian dream is just that: capitalist anarchy. A flightless, wingless bird.
Never meant to accuse you of such socialistic utopia designs of fairies, free health care for all or, ’social nets’ to help you back on your feet, keep your family from starving and pay for your oncology medical bills or, God forbid, helping the needy.
I surmise that if libertarians ever got their wish, they’d be gouging their eyes out to make amends while being the first to scream for a revival of government and enactment of a police state.
Happily, you’re only just a mild libertarian, though. As in only 99,(618)%. Not really libertarian at all, actually. This must mean you’re not selfish, cheap and stingy or a Republican (pardon the redundancy) either. Let alone an atheist Republican on steroids.
Libertarians have little to no grasp of what human greed is capable of. And it’s staring them in the mirror.
Or is it simply that you just don’t care?
- Timo Maas - Help Me (feat. Kelis)
———-
Sonyad,
Har, har har. Touche. :)
I do understand the (valid and not so valid) criticisms (both from right and left) of libertarianism, which is why I support a mixed market system .. but it must always value and uphold the “kick ass” libertarian spirit — so that the people never mistake intelligently regulated capitalism for socialism.
And all the congregation promptly dropped to the flower and began singins psalms and hymns in unison!
“All hail the invisible hand that guideth the individual’s individualistic in his singular yet eerily collective wisdom of the ubiquitous hive! All hail thee, anarchy! Our only lord, master and god…”
- Blue - You Make Me Wanna
———-
I think I agree a little more with P Coderich on this one.
My view is women were always whores. Conservative societies even give them more of a cover to assume a virtous pose while acting the slut in secret.
I base this view on sociobiology and genetics: the evidence shows that females evolved many physical and psychological “weapons” for the purpose of manipulation and extraction of male resources. Chief among these skills is cuckoldry. Studies are showing that there is and always has been a cuckoldry rate of somewhere between 10-25% of all children born.
This is why I think women and other criminals even “work” better and easier in strict, morally conservative societies - they are able to assume the mantle of virtuosity quite easily - then work their whore magic from there. Iow, nobody ever finds out, so they are never punished. Women from such countries are notorious whores - like the Asian countries, for example. The Arab women are probably devilishly hot sluts - look how much it takes fromt their men to keep them behaved.
I guess I just have a strong libertarian streak. I much prefer open societies, not because I’m a bleeding heart liberal who trusts in the goodness of people, because I’m a realist who acknowledges the evilness and nastiness of human behavior, and believe it only ferments and grows in the shadows. And although it takes time - perhaps too much time - open cultures eventually identify, convict and hang the ugliest behaviors and offenders. The invisible hand.
“What are you even doing here? I think what you really want is a return to the days when men paid all the bills, opened doors to women and went got drafted to war while women got to live.”
Bzzt. In those days women were loyal because society demanded it. I’d pay the bills and take care of a woman if I knew she would not stab my back the first time I turn it. Also wages were high enough for one job households before women started “working” and made the economy stagnant.
wolfe: Well, please keep in mind that’s not for all of us.
How womanly of you.
Impressive. Your thoughts on what others want are almost as accurate as a woman’s.
You’ve certainly got the intolerance, ignorance and rudeness to be a woman or a gay activist.
-wolfe
I’m straight as you get, but i don’t like feminism. It is a complete injustice how women take advantage of guys in countries like USA and Australia.
I don’t like gay or bi women. And no 1/2 the men here aren’t gay and I really doubt there is anything pretty about you at all.
No we dont have to put up with women no mater what.
You see over time your sex drive will decrease and just having good male friendship will suffice. What you need is just good company and it’s doubtful that you will ever find that in a female.
Female “sexuality” is an illusion, a myth, an act she puts on to manipulate and extract male resources.
Females are neither hetero, homo or bi-sexual… they are “buy-sexual”.
Iow, females don’t like sex - they like power, money and attention, and they use sex to get it - via men, women, children, whoever, whatever.
In summary, biologically speaking, women are whores.
Research has shown that both straight men and women are capable of being bi-curious, curious about a same-sex gender. Many people turn out to be between the lines of straight and gay, and straight ppl are more straight than gay. Some go through a “curious” phase, while others are actually really gay. Some ppl are homophobic because they are REALLY straight or scared. THe only reason why you would think women are universally “bi” (although this is not true) is because ppl in general accept bisexual women, whereas any gayness in a man is looked down upon.
ps - I’m pretty sure 1/2 the men posting in here are gay.