Women’s Vaginas Are Puke City
I’m going to talk about Britney Spears’ stupid vagina today even though I don’t see anything newsworthy or remotely interesting about what’s happened.
In that case, I’m going to use my man ability to turn something stupid and dull into something of value. Have you ever seen some homeless weirdo on the beach paint beautiful pictures out of chalk and trashcans? Or some other man and some fire turn a bunch of wood into more fire? That’s what I’m talking about.
Men are better than women because penises are better than vaginas.
Here’s why I don’t give even half a damn about Britney Spears and her precious fucking vagina.
Item 1: A female celebrity took some whorish pictures.
So has every woman. Browse MySpace for about five seconds for proof of that, or better yet just go take some random pictures of naked women. Why do you think photographers get laid so much? Women love that compromising manner of shit.
Item 2: A recently divorced woman took some whorish pictures.
Women are so completely incapable of affecting the world around them the only way they can try to hurt anyone (including an ex-husband) is by hurting themselves. Have you heard of bulimia? A lot of men haven’t because it’s a stupid problem and men don’t waste their time on stupid bullshit. Bulimia is the condition in which some poor fucking princess tries to get back at the world by abusing herself alone in the dark. What a waste of time!
Item 3: Vaginas are gross.
I’ve heard about Britney Spears and her fucking vagina pictures from three separate women today, who were each frothing at the mouth like rabid turkeys and flapping their giblets in such fervor I thought something gross was going to pop off of something else gross.
And so did they.
Women are gross and have cooties and they know it. That’s why they’re all so fucking excited about Britney Spears and her vagina and her smiley face caesarian scar. It’s like women all over the world are walking around this week wearing T-shirts that say “Vaginas Are” on the front part and then “Gross!” in big fuck off capital letters on the back.
Well you know what, for once women are right.
Men and their penises are featured not only in historic statues of artistic fame and incalculable worth, but also in comedies like Something About Mary and the advertisements for Deuce Bigolo 2. The man fact of the world is that penises have been bringing laughter and wonderment to the world for hundreds of thousands of years.
The only thing vaginas have ever done is ruined tasteful photos.
Related Articles:
December 22nd, 2006 at 8:18 pm - IP Man-Hash: abc4bc23027f8
Well said.
December 23rd, 2006 at 6:31 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
I did not expect you to agree, far from it.
I ask you this. What is true? What is fantasy? What is the truth? How do you personally define these?
History abounds in exceedingly productive systems which harnessed human nature most effectually, towards whatever objectives their initiators and driving individuals initially then subsequently set. Totalitarian (communist and fascist) regimes are a poignant example. Slavism based economies are another. To be effectively productive and effectively destructive are not at all mutually exclusive qualities.
It all comes down to what you seek to accomplish/achieve and what you seek to avoid/prevent that determines the definitive effectiveness of a social hierarchical/governance system. And what cost, both in ‘human material’ (Red Army at Stalingrad to deny a propaganda objective, American lives willingly expended at Pearl Harbour to turn reticent congress and public opinion in favour of American involvement in the war, Coventry to protect the Enigma code tables, etc.) as well as plain material cost, you’re willing to expend. The same complete and utter failure to some (the dead, the grieving) is a crowning achievement to others.
Of course, to you this is likely but further reason to long for the abolition of the state. To me, it’s evidence of the intrinsic evil in man waiting to augment if unleashed in a system tending towards anarchy. I ask you, what is it Libertarians intend to supplant governed society with? Certainly nothing better for the human condition.
What governance/social system would that be, with nothing but free will and dubious, fleeting self imposed morality with no deterring threat of enforced sanction from no one but the self and, optionally additionally, a begrudged deity displeased with one’s conduct threatening penance through eternal torment in some putative after life to reliably drive people as a majority towards species sustaining good, even if through coercion - isn’t that what policing and enforcing such statutes as there are pertaining to murder or rape and their afferent punitive measures is? - , to deter from wrongdoing?
Does doing away with the historically malfeasant action of governments balance out the anarchic system of Libertarianism democratically empowering the people to ill deeds with no threat of secular consequence from society as a whole?
Look but to Iraq for edification on what a Libertarian experiment might wish to accomplish if attempted. Of course, I might pardonably plow into the ‘armed populace’ gun advocacy fables here, but I won’t. The truth is self evident. Let who wishes to see, see.
Better to democratically periodically strive to insure government aims just and good, Biblical arbitrary good - the only absolutely true - , with no depleting or pernicious expense to any part of the population for the arbitrary benefit of another than to weaken or disband the state altogether and abolish any and all mandatory redistribution of wealth.
- Carl Orff, Carmina Burana (1937) - 02 Fortune plango vulnera
December 23rd, 2006 at 12:56 pm - IP Man-Hash: 98c4f9c613c11
Are you trying to say that the Ancient Romans were strictly heterosexual in the Christian and Conservative mold of pre-1960s America?(rolls eyes 50 times in a row)
December 23rd, 2006 at 12:58 pm - IP Man-Hash: 98c4f9c613c11
Female, you would give me a blow job if I wanted you to. Unfortunately for you, I think lesbians are ugly.
December 23rd, 2006 at 12:59 pm - IP Man-Hash: 98c4f9c613c11
I think Wolfe and Billy should start having sex with each other. However, I don’t see how that’s possible, since two pussies can’t screw each other.
P Coderch
December 23rd, 2006 at 1:02 pm - IP Man-Hash: 98c4f9c613c11
What the hell does nihilism have to do with lebertarianism? Answer: nothing. Libertarianism is the most rational, reponsible and sublime exaltation of the individual and his rights there is. Nihilism, conversely, dictates that we have no value as individuals or as a Society, then eveything is allowed. Libertarianism is the extreme polar opposite of nihilism.
P Coderch
December 23rd, 2006 at 1:06 pm - IP Man-Hash: 98c4f9c613c11
Beta-Males-Unite, keep putting sense in the brains of these chivalrous pussy-whipped bastards, otherwise we’ll continue to see little boys being genitally mutilated by their chivalrous bastard dads, and women to remain eternally eing treated as “enhanced” children. The word “enhanced” is used to emphasize that the female condition is infinetely better than that of children, because while the latter have no responsabilities, they also have no rights, while women have no responsabilites, like children, BUT all the rights of adults. Keep up the great work. You kick ass!
P Coderch
December 23rd, 2006 at 1:38 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5fdb78f644952
I offer no comment, since none is needed for those with eyes to see and ears to hear.
I don’t (and didn’t) accuse you of the former. The latter? Yes, that makes sense.
Who decides how this is done? And who acts to ensure contracts are enforced?
Well we already have this. You can get married in a state with lax marital laws that’s not a community property state with a marriage contract. It’s true there’s a chance that won’t be upheld, but that’s true of any contract.
So what you’re proposing isn’t (initially at least) libertarian at all. You simply seek a new overt ruleset, rather than permitting people to contract as they wish — even if we agree they are contracting foolishly and stupidly, as present-day marriages certainly are.
You then hope that this new ruleset may permit a relatively libertarian society to emerge.
Have I got it right?
I’m not trying to attack your views, or even (at this stage) to debate them; I’m simply trying to understand them, as they seem to be shifting subtly as I enquire. It seemed before that you and P were proposing a revolutionary change — the kind that’s not been seen for thousands, perhaps tens of thousands of years.
Now you seem to simply believe that imposing new rules of some sort upon society, while maintaining entirely the structure of family and marriage — can lead to the changes you so fervently desire.
And no, I don’t think you’re a nihilist, though it’s somewhat difficult to tell at the moment.
Best,
-wolfe
December 23rd, 2006 at 3:30 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
What the hell does nihilism have to do with leberwurstism? Answer: nothing. Leberwurstism is the most irrational, reprehensible and subversive exaltation of the egocentrist and his egotistical manias there is. Nihilism, similarly, dictates that we have no value as individuals or as a Society, then everything is allowed. Leberwurstism is the extreme polar congruent of nihilism.
P Coderch
Partially correct. A quote to which I complementary complete with another.
Accurate. One might perspicaciously perceive a particular libertarian among us is lacking ‘civilisational restraint’. Yet it’s still SotS that put it best.
Silly little nerdy robots. Ever plotting to rule the world through no rule, ever fruitlessly. Thankfully.
- Carl Orff, Carmina Burana (1937) 28 - O Fortuna
December 23rd, 2006 at 3:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Oy Coderch. Really. Drop a pebble to your right and it would fall off the Earth.
Government is the manliest thing since an ape bore the first queen of England, haven’t you heard?
December 23rd, 2006 at 4:59 pm - IP Man-Hash: 98c4f9c613c11
What the hell does nihilism have to do with leberwurstism? Answer: nothing. Leberwurstism is the most irrational, reprehensible and subversive exaltation of the egocentrist and his egotistical manias there is. Nihilism, similarly, dictates that we have no value as individuals or as a Society, then everything is allowed. Leberwurstism is the extreme polar congruent of nihilism.
P Coderch
Partially correct. A quote to which I complementary complete with another.
Accurate. One might perspicaciously perceive a particular libertarian among us is lacking ‘civilisational restraint’. Yet it’s still SotS that put it best.
Silly little nerdy robots. Ever plotting to rule the world through no rule, ever fruitlessly. Thankfully.
- Carl Orff, Carmina Burana (1937) 28 - O Fortuna
Changing my post does not change the fact that you’re wrong. Libertarianism advocates individual responsability, respect for individual rights, a rational approach to government, seeing it as a corporation with a specific purpose instead of a the embodiment of the will of a collective - which allows those in power to trump indidvidual rights to serve themselves, etc. You are a loser if you disagree with me here.
P Coderch
December 24th, 2006 at 2:10 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
That might well be. Yet I contend you’re a leberwurstian, regardless.
- Carl Orff, Carmina Burana (1937) - 23 Veni, veni, venias
December 24th, 2006 at 7:11 am - IP Man-Hash: 479ab57a00cdd
@Wolfe/Sony/All
Gentleman, the world you seem to be accusing me of desiring sounds eerily similar to the liberal/conservative dystopia I grew up in and wish to escape.
I think the greatest difference I have with the traditional mindset is, I view civilization and it’s subsystems (religion, politics, culture, art, science, technology, etc) to be products of human nature - rather than the other way around. I believe we are naturally a moral, logical and emotional animal, with good and bad sides, designed by evolution to operate on both an individual and collective/group level .. interdependent, interlocking, self-regulating, self-organizing systems and subsystems with inherent, defined, hardcoded ranges and parameters of thought, experience and behavior. I believe life to be nothing more than a system, and all living things to be biological “robots”, which serve as vehicles for genes.
As radical as my view may seem to you, I would argue westernism founders’ core views were similar, and radical for their time:
(from wikipedia)Jefferson believed that individuals have an innate sense of morality that prescribes right from wrong when dealing with other individuals—that whether they choose to restrain themselves or not, they have an innate sense of the natural rights of others.
Let’s toss the term “libertarian” for a second .. too confusing… it means too many things to too many people.
I’m an empiricist and a rationalist. My views are largely based upon mainstream (non racist, non sexist, non eugenicist, non hateful) neo-darwinistic theories in the mold of Richard Dawkins, Steven Pinker, Daniel Dennett and Robert Wright. Pinker’s most recent work does a decent job at presenting the case:
——————
(excerpt from wikipedia)
The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature is a best-selling 2002 book by Steven Pinker arguing against tabula rasa models of psychology, arguing that the human mind is substantially shaped by evolutionary psychological adaptations.
Pinker argues that modern science has challenged three “linked dogmas” that comprise the dominant view of human nature in intellectual life:
the blank slate (the mind has no innate traits)
the noble savage (people are born good and corrupted by society)
the ghost in the machine (each of us has a soul that makes choices free from biology)
Much of the book is dedicated to examining fears of the social and political consequences of his view of human nature:
“the fear of inequality”
“the fear of imperfectibility”
“the fear of determinism”
“the fear of nihilism”
Pinker claims these fears are non sequiturs, and that the blank slate view of human nature would actually be a greater threat if it were true. For example, he argues that political equality does not require sameness, but policies that treat people as individuals with rights; that moral progress doesn’t require the human mind to be naturally free of selfish motives, only that it has other motives to counteract them; that responsibility doesn’t require behavior to be uncaused, only that it responds to praise and blame; and that meaning in life doesn’t require that the process that shaped the brain must have a purpose, only that the brain itself has purposes. He also argues that grounding moral values in claims about a blank slate opens them to possibility of being overturned by future empirical discoveries; and that belief in a blank slate human nature encourages destructive social trends such as persecution of the successful and totalitarian social engineering …
——————
I usually describe my political stance simply as “libertarian”, mainly because there is no other term laymen usually easily/quickly understand, and mainly because “real” libertarians and I strive to do more or less the same thing: build effective market and governmental systems which properly and fairly balance rights and responsibilities, towards ethical and productive outcomes, for both the individual and the whole, to maximize growth in both the short and long terms.
However, “original” “real” libertarians such as Jefferson, Smith, et al - were not privileged with our modern scientific understanding of evolution, natural systems, human nature, genetics, computer science, etc. Neo-darwinist libertarians such as I seek to continue on in the tradition of westernism’s founders, by updating our libertarian-based systems to reflect our updated understanding of the Age of Enlightenment concepts these systems were based upon.
In my view, one of the most important factors westernism’s founders failed to predict was the unique psychology and value system of females and children/young adults,which I believe “unmasked” itself shortly after women gained the right to vote, and also after academic institutions (populated mostly by young adults) gained greater visibility on the western scene. Imo, this phenonema, and the failure of anyone then or since to clearly identify or understand it, led to the unchallenged, under-the-radar rise of matriarchal socialism both culturally and politically, on both the left and the right .. and is best exemplified by the rise of the “soft left” ie western leftism ie “liberalism” ie “feminism” [as opposed to the "hard left" ie eastern leftism ie "Stalinism", which is much more of an adult - though woefully incorrect - masculine mindset] and the conservative right’s largely futile efforts to contain it.
That being said, the founders of westernism did the best they possibly could with the information available to them at the time, and to then take their radical new vision and navigate the traditionalist socio-political landscape of the 18th century. I would argue that our libertarian-based systems in only 230 years have advanced human civilization more than in all of prior human history (scientist estimate anatomically modern homo sapiens emerged about 130,000 years ago) combined, and is still chugging along in a positive direction overall, in spite of all of it’s problems.
-BMU
December 24th, 2006 at 3:12 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Quite.
http://world.std.com/~mhuben/libindex.html
Unpleasant perusing!
And a merry Christmas and a happy new year for all! Those marsupials among us yet to be shot by Stallone included.
- Offspring - Want You Bad
December 24th, 2006 at 4:04 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Quite.
http://world.std.com/~mhuben/libindex.html
Most unpleasant perusing!
And a merry Christmas and a happy new year for all! Those marsupials among us yet to be shot by Stallone included.
- the sounds sony makes while blissfully savouring a bottle of aged Cabernet Sauvignon from Vrancea’s hills
December 24th, 2006 at 4:05 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
I’ve completely forgotten my previous post, undoubtedly still awaiting moderation… How cool is that?
December 25th, 2006 at 6:20 am - IP Man-Hash: 6cd139f0c8028
LOL
Stallone couldn’t pass our newly announced entry tests on either knowledge of our culture or literacy. This particular marsupial feels remarkably free of lead.
Likewise on the greetings.
December 25th, 2006 at 5:05 pm - IP Man-Hash: db423994ebcf1
Merry Christmas to all from the North Pole! May you all have a good day!
-Strength and Honor-
December 26th, 2006 at 4:24 am - IP Man-Hash: 98c4f9c613c11
I don’t even know what the fuck that means. Stop speaking in codes and MAN UP!
P Coderch
December 26th, 2006 at 5:49 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
My apologies. All hail thee, P Coderch, king of the Leberwurstians!
- Die Walkure - Ride of the Valkyries