But It Happened to Me! Who Fucking Cares?
Women like to argue. They love it because it’s one of the few things in life where fucking up at it gets you more.
Take pies for example. If you go into a restaurant and try to serve the waitresses a pie with your face they’re probably not going to serve you another one.
Arguing is different. The less listening (women refer to this as “not talking”) you do, the more you get to do it. For women it’s like a pint that’s got a treasure map to a free pint on the bottom. Holy shit, I wonder if that’s patented.
Of the many ways women argue too stupidly to fathom, this is my least favorite:
But it happened to me! And this is how I feel about it!
What am I supposed to do with that? It sounds and looks like a useless piece of shit, but the look on her face says it’s something wonderfully impressive. Like some kind of artwork. Women are the opposite of magicians. They do nothing and look fucking astounded whereas a magician will make your face disappear and look like the smuggest prick in the universe.
That’s why women make shitty magicians. That and they hate little kids.
If you want to see the Me, Me, Me Defense in action, try engaging a group of women in an abortion argument. If you’re in the right part of town — any part of town that’s out after 10PM — you can bet your ass half of them will have “had it happen to them.”
Somehow letting a man pay for an abortion makes a woman an expert on the subject. That reminds me of the time I opened a dental practice after I let my parents pay for a cavity filling when I was eight years old. Or it least it would if I was a woman and tooth decay was a fetus.
Having it happen to you doesn’t give you any extra say. All men know that. That’s why a man calls another man when he ends up in prison for some reason. That’s why men call lawyers instead of their mothers or their dumb as fuck best friend when another man has kicked the crap out of them.
Women don’t. It’s the dumbest, most manipulative, and egotistical debate tactic that could ever be imagined. I hesitate to even call it a tactic because it’s so retarded, but it does qualify in the same way women barely qualify for everything else.
So it is a tactic, and that means you can use it. Keep it in your man bag. Every woman jumps on the Me, Me, Me Defense like it’s a bar tender.
Related Articles:
Psychology is an aging and defunct field. If it is to survive, it must become more established and disciplined; I read somewhere that 60% of all Americans show symptoms of one mental illness. That is not true of any other medical field.
By the way, were you trying to make a point or were you just plagiarizing someone else’s work? Nobody likes a lying sack of shit.
The mentally ill are the witches of the 21st century.
Looking for a safe stance on abortion?…… Yea, me neither
Ha! I can tell you with certainty that if only men drove, traffic accidents would decrease by 98%. After all, I am sure there are some faulty traffic lights.
Fathers and Husbands need to stop letting their daughters and wives, drive!
Arguing about abortion?
Well, where I live, on the right side of the state of Washington [Seattle is the wrong side of the state], 90% of the women are solidly pro-life. So, if you’re arguing against abortion, you’ll get no argument from them. Maybe some homemade cookies, but no argument. The other 10% are too busy to argue because they’re busy packing up to move to Seattle.
If you are arguing “anti-life” [what they call pro-choice in Seattle and Portland] then you won’t get any argument from the 90%. They’ll just rip off your head and shit in your neck. And the other 10% are still busy packing up and heading out.
That’s impressive, Al. Their stats are a little bogus here and there, but not totally out to lunch. It certainly meshes with my observations.
-wolfe
A wise move, Giannis, if you believe this site:
- Women drive only 30% of miles driven but are in 37% of the fatal accidents
- How drunk does a man have to be to drive as dangerously as a sober woman? Answer: seven drinks
- Women pilots have a crash rate four times higher than men pilots.
- Women truckers have a crash rate six times higher than men truckers.
- NHTSA data suggests that women drivers are only 70% more likely than men drivers to have a fatal accident.
- NHTSA data suggests that a man who drinks and drives increases his probability of having an accident by 4% and ignores that sober women drivers have a probability of having an accident equivalent to that of men drivers with a BAC of 0.12.
- NHTSA data suggests that if only men drove:
Traffic accidents would decrease by 22%.
9,159 lives would be saved each year.
330,000 lives would be saved over the next 30 years.
$44 billion per year would be saved in crash repair costs.
- NHTSA data suggests that if only women drove:
There would be 23,879 more traffic fatalities each year.
There would be 7,674 more women killed each year.
-Big Al
I dont even get in a car that a female is driving, how about a plane!
Well, they always said that air travel is the safest. Now we know why heh.
Despite the fact that the first woman in the UK won her licence in 1911, today only 6% of licensed pilots in the UK are female with less than 3% flying professionally.
No surprises, as usual.
Good to know, Big Al.
-Dick
According to the US Department of Labor, about 87% of air traffic controllers are men.
We have just seen what a sensible idea this is.
-Big Al
No wonder women are rarely stopped for directions.
No doubt here.
My sister made that silly joke about men not wanting to ask for directions and I replied “The last time I stopped and asked for directions there was a woman who left me more confused and lost then before I asked her.” Needless to say my sister did not appreciate the truth.
-Women suck at giving directions.
No wonder women are rarely stopped for directions.
She doesn’t need one, gwallan. As I understand it, wherever she wants to go could technically be in any direction.
-Big Al
And for gods sake DO NOT show fem a map!!
/salute Dick on observation; /salute Christian on “banality”, /salute Dakota for trying, like me, to communicate.
Female, you’re trying for a special case. Even at that you fail. If you want to dispute surveyors; I spent a few weeks working as one (obviously as an apprentice) during the summer.
Dakota is entirely correct, and it doesn’t take surveying experience to say so. Give it a rest.
Here’s my suggestion. Leave this site until July, Eastern Daylight Time. Maybe during that time you will relax; maybe your bf will make you relax; maybe you will hit satori.
Come back in July, be polite, and logical and rational, and you’re more than likely to be met with the same. No dolphins, please.
Attention doesn’t have to be bad. You’re capable of more. Show it.
-wolfe
Uh … Fem … let’s use a quick diagram. You’re standing midway between two McDonald’s:
[ McD's ] [ McD's ]How many directions can you go in which there are a McDonald’s?
Answer: precisely two. They aren’t located in just any direction, but in two directions. Consequently, a weather vane pointing in any direction other than one of the two in which a McDonald’s is located will not be pointing toward a McDonald’s.
The more it writes, the more it prove it’s banality.
Female, you are a worthless idiot. Your new man-friend really won himself a prize pig.
-Dick
If a woman was standing exactly mid-way between two or more McDonalds (which can happen) then technically, the nearest McDonalds could be in either or any direction. To be entirely precise you would need surveyers.
Agreed, Dakota, especially your point on gender-based ranges for “normal” behavior.
Female:
Considering Mcdonalds are in every direction, cheers.
The nearest McDonald’s is not in “every” or any direction. It is in one direction.
You’re welcome.
-wolfe
Considering Mcdonalds are in every direction, cheers.
That’s close to the case for me, Wolfe. It was a combination of things that turned me off from feminism, and indeed convinced me of the inherent superiority of the male sex. Personal experience, while a major component, was by no means the only component.
In terms of personal experience, I’m capable of looking at it fairly objectively: it’s possible that my experience with women is atypical, for a variety of reasons. That’s why I run a reality check against the experiences of other men and (because I have family members in the field) with psychologists in general.
Without fail, every man my age has had similar experiences. Not all of them have had a failed marriage (though a fair percentage have), but all of them have experience with psychotic behavior on the part of the women they’ve known.
Furthermore, psychologists (the good ones, mind you, not the psychobabblers) will readily admit that there are two standards for “normal” behavior: one that applies to men and one that applies to women. If one applied the male standard to women, a huge number of women would be diagnosed with personality disorders that presently are not. It even shows up in standardized psychological tests such as the MMPI: scores that would be interpreted as a personality disorder in men are interpreted as within norm for women.
This is actually a reasonable point. It’s completely wrong, but it’s the most logical thing you’ve said today.
You ignore the fact that men in general — and the men here in particular — tend to analyze things that happen to them personally and fit them into a larger rational framework.
We do not take umbrage against a class of people the way women do. It takes much more time for a man to conclude that an entire group (that presents itself positively) is malign.
Were women accurate in their anger, and judgments, this would be a huge advantage for women, and a huge weakness of men. Since the accuracy of women is roughly that of a weathervane pointing the way to the nearest McDonalds, this is not the case.
Many of us started out as pro-feminist. It took, not negative personal experiences, but several years of observation and thought, coupled with a lot of reading to bring us round to our present view. Negative personal experiences didn’t hurt that process of course, but they didn’t drive it (at least not for me).
Regards,
-wolfe
Female, we already know you don’t know anything. That’s what we’ve been saying since you first set your club foot on this site.
Now fuck off.
-Dick
Most of you justify being here because you yourself have experienced negativitiy from feminism firsthand. So if that isn’t the pot calling the kettle black, I don’t know what the hell is.
Good point indeed, both Dick and RAP.
Yep. No need to be in the “right part of town”, just look around menarebetterthanwomen.com. I don’t think we’ve a single female poster who hasn’t used this, often repeatedly. Sometimes they disguise it, but often it’s just the blatant “I feel”.
-wolfe
Good fucking point Dick, we all see that happen here time after time. This should be a woman law.