Keep The Camping To Purse Sales
Men are much better than women at camping. In fact, women are so bad at it, that there’s almost nothing as unpleasant as camping with a woman.
Except maybe one thing.
Camping with two women.
Women are full of shit. They shirk the equality curtain when it fits like a snake shedding its skin, and in the case of why women can’t do things like camping, construction working, or cigarette smoking worth a damn, they run the princess game faster than Logan. It’s a bunch of shit though. See, you can tell immediately because a woman is saying it.
The dirt and the infrequent showers have nothing to do with why women hate camping. Imagine this if you will.
You’ve accidentally locked yourself inside a shitty motel room in some hick town because you dropped a suitcase on the door knob and broke it off — accidentally. The only thing in the room for entertainment is a television set. Then it turns out that, oh great, some prick broke the television set.
Does that sound like fun? No fucking way. If you weren’t a man that kind of thing would reduce you to a babbling, neurotic mess within an hour. That’s why women behave like shrill disasters when they are taken camping; because nature is a woman’s Podunk, locked-in motel room and her mind is a broken television set.
How many women philosophers have there been? There has never been one, because not only do philosophers have to buy their own bullshit (and no woman ever has ever believed a word she said), but they also have to be alone with their thoughts for longer than the four seconds it takes a woman to say, ‘Not tonight I’m tired,’ and then pass out on the bigger half of the bed.
To all the young men out there — and I see this all the time, if you’re holding out for a woman who can go camping with you or some other klepto-crazy shit like play video games with you or what have you, I have one piece of advice. Why hold out for one? Why not just hold out for two…or a dozen?
Fuck, the sky’s the limit in fantasy land where a woman can go camping without embarrassing herself and everyone she’s with.
Related Articles:
September 25th, 2005 at 3:06 pm - IP Man-Hash: 56806c0431943
And yet here you are, your one of those irritating people who continue to “argue” even after the other person has shut the door.
How can I put this in a way your little brain will understand.
I DONT CARE WHAT YOU THINK. dont bother to respond, really.
September 25th, 2005 at 3:10 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3dddc19b55aad
Nicely predicted again, Dick.
September 25th, 2005 at 3:13 pm - IP Man-Hash: 56806c0431943
Dick predicted nothing, I predicted that he would respond, which he did.
September 25th, 2005 at 3:19 pm - IP Man-Hash: 1c02f21d37550
Thank you, alen. Good thing there isn’t some kind of emoticon that injures people over the internet. Nicole’s already resorted to shouting with her capital letters. When dealing with women that means double-standard violence is moments away.
Nicole, I was simply stating that if you knew your answer was not going to be accepted, it was pointless and a waste of your time to respond. That’s just like the battered wife who keeps coming home with her tail between her legs. It’s sad, pathetic, and exactly like you.
-Dick
September 25th, 2005 at 3:25 pm - IP Man-Hash: 56806c0431943
Once again, pointing out the lesser evil. A man who batters his wife is much worse than the woman who returns.
September 25th, 2005 at 3:28 pm - IP Man-Hash: 1c02f21d37550
That’s got nothing to do with the point. What a surprise.
-Dick
September 25th, 2005 at 3:32 pm - IP Man-Hash: bbdbd8f85eb8a
Nicole, you are missing the point. Try thinking “outside the box.” When I ask for the person who invented the telescope, give me something comparable–not just a telescope inventor–but make it relevant and comparable. I’m not going to get into an insult-slinging parade–and you, surprisingly, haven’t either (at least to me). I need proof–as men are wont to do–that women are equal to men if this is going to be the recurring theme.
One thing, ladies, that you’re not seeing in all of this is that the concept of equality of the sexes is impossible–and I’m not even giving you a hard time here. We are separate genders, therefore, we cannot be equal–it is inherently impossible. Men (generally speaking) are stronger, faster, more logical, capable of thinking more abstractly and have needed to be for ages — it all goes back to the primitive hunter-gatherer concept.
Men, who were the hunters, needed to rely on their wits and physical prowess to survive.
Women , on the other hand, were nurturers of family: conception, birth, oral communication and the gathering of nuts, berries, and roots were the staple of women’s lives–and, unfortunately, left women ill-prepared to meet man in modern societies.
Now, amongst other women, the different intellectual and physical hierarchies are evident, though still different IN COMPARISON with men.
But, ladies, why compare yourselves with such loathsome creatures as men? Comparison always leads to the root problem–the need to compare means that one is equal to the other, but of differing substance. Be happy with yourselves and realize that men should have a forum to discuss women–imperfections and all–whether or not you like it.
Have a good evening, combatants.
September 26th, 2005 at 8:31 am - IP Man-Hash: 681f2e2cfc31a
Sera, Ness, WHoretencia:
Come on, girlies. You’re not going to have Nicole do ALL of the work, are you? Surely, with the combined brainpower of one substandard man, the group of you honeys could break out the encyclopedia and figure out that my questions, though loaded, illustrate my point.
September 26th, 2005 at 9:22 am - IP Man-Hash: 56806c0431943
So basically Jason, you were lying when you said you would consider women your equals if we could come up with 5 of your examples.
September 26th, 2005 at 11:12 am - IP Man-Hash: 0e2f2db43d2f0
Seriously, watch a woman try to pack sometime. It is terrible and tragic.
September 26th, 2005 at 11:26 am - IP Man-Hash: 681f2e2cfc31a
Not “come up with.” I meant, ANSWER correctly.
Why am I repeating myself? I asked for answers, not conjecture or near-answers.
Best example: that obscure-ass Elizabethan painter you mentioned (who even you had to explain what she did). Who the FUCK was she? I said World-renowned. I ask for Jerry Seinfeld, and you give me Carrot Top. Jesus Christ.
As far as I’m concerned, any more posts by women in this NO WOMEN ALLOWED Men’s forum do not exist to me–I will skip over them.
No, little girls’ remarks do not give this forum any pizzazz. It makes it void of any possible intelligent discussions and frustratingly circular in logic. Thisis the EXACT reason women NEVER invent anything. They can never get out the door. Women are boring and conniving and other women don’t even like them for it.
All replies to this from women will be ignored. Fuck you!
September 26th, 2005 at 11:50 am - IP Man-Hash: e2bdae6dd4ca9
“As far as I’m concerned, any more posts by women in this NO WOMEN ALLOWED Men’s forum do not exist to me–I will skip over them.”
Why did you ask the women any questions in the first place, Jason? How very convenient that you want to ignore them all NOW.
And for the record, you just came out worse in an argument with someone who says things like, “Dick predicted nothing, I predicted that he would respond, which he did.”
Congratulations!
Oh, and fuck you too.
September 26th, 2005 at 12:07 pm - IP Man-Hash: 56806c0431943
jason, even with you bitching about some of my answers I still gave you 6 which you have not discredited. Thats more than the 5 you requested.
So yes to lied, either that or you had no intension of considering us as equals in which case why ask?
September 26th, 2005 at 2:00 pm - IP Man-Hash: 681f2e2cfc31a
Dick, what do you, Dan, alen, Manley, or any of the other men think here? Do I ask a lot? Have my questions been thoroughly and CORRECTLY answered? Are these women still bitching (I’ve decided not to acknowledge their turd-like excuses for posts)? Perhaps within the upbringings these chicks were raised, an INCORRECT answer or deed was rewarded because their parents/teachers/gimp-handlers didn’t wish to quell their already fragile self-esteems with the crushing reality that they would never live up to a man’s potential.
I don’t know about you guys, but a CORRECT answer also constitutes a fact. Anything close to that is still subpar. Hey, same could be said for a man–anything close to but not equal to a man is still inequal and, therefore, subpar.
September 26th, 2005 at 2:51 pm - IP Man-Hash: a071e097cf3de
Dick, Dick, can I have a cookie? Will you be my friend, Dick? Look at me Dick, I’m posting great aren’t I! Hey Dick am I doing good? Am I? Am I posting good stuff for you Dick? Can I get my lollipop now?
Sincerely,
Jason
September 26th, 2005 at 5:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: 681f2e2cfc31a
Anyway, back to my question.
September 26th, 2005 at 7:33 pm - IP Man-Hash: 1c02f21d37550
Kate, please. Men don’t give out things like lollipops and unicorn stickers. If any accolade is necessary we have badges of merit, trophies of metal, etc.
-Dick
September 26th, 2005 at 8:12 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3f6f1bc89c9c0
jason…it’s sad that they continue to stay where they are not wanted. Not even my huge, well lubricated man-brain can understand why they are still posting here. At first it was funny to see Dick’s articles come to life in the posts by these wantwit women, but now it’s just sad and annoying. Who knows, maybe one day they will leave and we will have a chance for some serious discourse.
September 26th, 2005 at 8:13 pm - IP Man-Hash: 681f2e2cfc31a
which “women”? I actually know some decent women–albeit not up to par with men–but the girlies here really do their sex a disservice
September 27th, 2005 at 2:52 am - IP Man-Hash: 682b6c01ada1d
jason, you did kinda say that if a women could give you 5 answers you would consider them equals. You cant go back on your word, your giving us men a bad name.
Edit by Dick
This is actually Nicole. Posted from the same IP. Poor form.