Multi-Task? Don’t Make Me Multi-Laugh — Or Multi-Shit.
I was sent this question by a reader:
In the beginning, when God made men and women, it was pretty simple. God made men strong and smart so they could hunt and he made women to carry children, cook and clean. Then as women realized how much greater men were they started to attempt manly jobs. Now, women get pissed at men because they have to do their day job then come home and do what God intended for them to. What do you think?
The reason women are so fucked in their heads these days is because they invented The Career Woman. The Career Woman is like that guy in Short Circuit. Not that guy; that robot. He can’t do anything right, it takes two other guys to babysit him all day, and before he learned his lesson he caused about ten million dollars in property damage. Go watch that film with an insurance adjuster. He’ll tell you.
That’s women for you.
God certainly did make men strong and smart. God made mankind in his own image. If I had to make the opposite of a man in my own image, then I wouldn’t know what the fuck to do. If I was God, I guess I would make her totally incompetent and rude. I would also make her hate facial hair. How fucking annoying.
Women will always have to cook and clean. Ask any married woman and she’ll tell you the same thing, “I don’t mind cooking and cleaning and doing laundry for my family.” Good. Then shut up and do it because men do mind that kind of brainless shit. We’ve minded since we invented having a job.
Over the course of a million years, men have evolved into problem solvers par excellence. When out hunting woolly mammoths, men had to invent shit on the fly like flanking and sign language and the Half Nelson. Women didn’t have to evolve any of that shit into their brains. And that’s exactly the stuff we men use every day at work. It’s the extra 30 cents on the dollar women are always complaining about. When women try to match men in the job market, they’re not jumping into the deep end, they’re diving into the Grand Canyon with water wings strapped to their ankles.
Yet women still have to do the cooking and the cleaning. What are men going to do it? What next? Use the television to prop the door open and draw reruns of Coach on the doorstop? Don’t be absurd. Everything has a purpose.
Women’s purpose is to tidy up. That’s what you evolve by sitting in a cave for a million years and waiting for food to come home. You evolve the fucking invaluable skill set of tidying and fucking obsessing about tidying. Women can escape their curse of tidying as much as men can escape their curse of taking care of business and making shitloads of money. We’re fucking televisions and doorstops in here. You can use a television to hold your door open, but why the fuck would you do that?
Well you would if you were a Career Woman. You’d hold doors open from 9-5 and then come home and do the dishes like you were supposed to in the first place. That’s not multi-tasking, it’s just stupid and exhausting.
Men are better than women because we don’t think the grass is greener on the other side. We’re men. We’ve got the greenest grass in the whole fucking universe. We’ve got grass as green as 100 dollar bills.
Related Articles:
I guess that’s what this website is for though, it does help to open some women’s eyes…..but unfortunately, some women only end up infuriated, and keep themselves narrow-minded
Those comments are very interesting if carefully deconstructed. They are built on an assumption of Anglo-American female entitlement and assumed self-worth. If Anglo-American men dare to voice criticism of women, it is implied they must have something wrong with them - they must be gay, whatever - because they cannot ’see’ the wonder of Anglo-American womanhood. It never occurs to these women that they themselves might have serious defects in character (or even serious personality disorders), that are causing Anglo-American males to increasingly hate and avoid them. This is sad, as it means the already poor relations between Anglo-American men and women will only get worse.
And I do not fancy being a dhimmi in an Islamic super-state.
@ Muzalon- Oh YEAH, definitely, I just posted about that actually, under one of the other topics….It’s so annoying to read all the “you’re gay” “you’re a cocksucker” comments the women have been posting
No. The issue is that women who post on here (a handful excepted) are clearly enraged Anglo-American fuck-ups, agitated by the thought of being eaten by their own cats in lonely old age. Their responses to any kind of criticism seem to be homophobic/racist/misandrist rants entirely bereft of logical thought, revealing heartless, disturbed and unfulfilled personalities. If that is the typical Anglo-American female’s psychic landscape, who wants or needs it?
Do you see my point?
So you don’t want to understand…? Should I give up and just consent with everything? I think I’m outnumbered anyway…
Yes, you do - and that is the problem.
Maybe her and I can hold hands when we jump off the cliff…?
Um, maybe you want to be a cocksucker, and iron shirts for the rest of your life, but us “career grrrrrls” have some ambition. And I give a shit about my job, and I am rarely in an office- 90% of the time I’m outside blowing the shit out of something or sleeping in the woods- I love it. I don’t do it for the money to buy shoes, I do it because I ENJOY it
Funny: each Man Post is absolutely correct. KW especially. Yet, after Alissa bitches because she’s not the center of attention and is unable to grasp basic Man Concepts, she bitches more. THEN, she says she’s leaving. THEN she posts a novella about the same garbage. THEN says she’s leaving….
THEN JUST FUCKING STOP!!!
She never did, nor will, understand what we know as “logic”. That’s too difficult for her (or any woman). Not to mention clearly missed the part about “Females leave now”.
I completely agree. Women should just shut the fuck up and get back into the kitchen, iron some fucking shirts, and suck dick when they’re told to. I am sick of how so many women want to be “career grrrrrls.” WHY?! They want to work a shitty office job that no one gives a shit about, and then still have to come home and keep house? Just to fit some retarded feminist ideal? Nah, I would much rather keep my house immaculate, cook fabulous meals and still have the energy to give head than to put up with some 9-5 horse shit just so I can have enough money to buy a dumb pair of high heels. Fuck career women, as a matter of fact, fuck most women because they’re fucking stupid.
Omg I love this fuckin site. This is the best website I ever been to. No Ma’am!!
I order you to commit suicide.
Lol @ virgin nerds who can’t get any if their lives depended on it
You guys have been dumped and rejected a LOT, haven’t you? Or do you just not try because you know you will fail? :P
No you were not silly to take it literally. Men being better than women isn’t misogynism. Apples are better than oranges but it don’t mean I hate oranges. Just because women suck as humans don’t mean we hate them all.
Actually, I’m South African. Nice country. Come and visit sometime :-) I have American friends who are totally shocked at how traditional South African women can appear to be. I think they think we’re a bit backwards, and need to be reformed. The thing is, because we were cut off from the rest of the world for so many years, we’ve lagged behind the rest of the Western world in a number of areas. Strident feminism isn’t the way to go, though, in my opinion. Courtesy and respect go a long way to creating good relationships between the sexes. Thanks for putting up with me on your forum.
I don’t bother - I just hurl the necessary insults to get them on their way. It amuses me.
Well, I will only accidentally say this, one time.
You are not all that bad. You are well-spoken, intelligent, etc.
I am not supposed to feed the Trolls dammit.
VERY good. Respect is never given, it is earned. Common courtesy is given, actually. Everyone does their own part, and I can only assume that as a female and Non-American, you are more normal than our American gals………….as you can see by the posts.
If you say Russia is your home, I will marry you. Contractually of course. I am a American after all……………hahahaha! (He giveth, then he taketh away!)
King Wang, if you’ve got motion sickness, you shouldn’t be eating fried bacon or a cheeseburger!
Anyhow, I’m off. Just so you know, I’m not American, I come from a patriarchal country, and a patriarchal family, where my dad is head of the family, and all of us respect him. And he respects us in turn.
I’m surprised you bother reading their posts. After the Joan-troll’s Sex in the City melodrama posts, I just skim to establish whether they’re a troll or a genuine poster these days, can’t be bothered trying to have a rational discussion with idiots determined to fill up idle bandwidth and server space any more. The same tired old insult arguments repeated over and over by outraged women really get fucking boring…
I have no idea, I got motion sickness after the 32nd paragraph………
At a guess, personal opinion, no facts, no truth, womanly reality, and spread out even longer than MY posts.
Who the fuck said men were more stubborn? At least you ARE better at than I. I bet, given proper training, there is not a beer wagon one you couldn’t pull around, you little mule you.
MansVoice is being nice. He will call the cops next time. He carries Man-Spray, connected to his Testicles of Man-Justice. Or something. Hey, if the operation was successful, why gripe? I heard his plumbing is good….from a previous whine-bag woman.
I have no idea if you agreed, or disagreed. Probably because I was thinking that I need some fried bacon, or a cheeseburger……mmmmmmmmmm………
Why haven’t you fucked off already?
KW said: “Ok. I won’t miss you if you don’t participate. It is not a man-loss, but proves again that women are too lazy to do the hard stuff. In order to prove a point, you might consider actually working for it. People follow Leaders, not more followers.”
You won’t miss me? Hmmm. Then why did you bother to write such a long response? A provocative response, I might add, which is meant to annoy the “woman” in me as woman can’t shut up, they always need to prove their point, and by responding (as you probably knew I would) you can now say “See - you said you wouldn’t participate, but now you have. What a typical woman response from a woman. You’re inconsistent and lacking Man qualities of reticence.”
KW said: “You misunderstand Dick. NO woman understands real Dick. They don’t know what to make of Dick. So therefore……..they don’t know Dick. Then again, to them, they are so lazy they don’t TRY…….”
No - I don’t understand Dick. If I pretended I did I would be lying. How can anyone know or understand someone by their writings? It’s like an author creating a main character in a novel (an alter ego perhaps), and a reader then believing that they understand everything about what makes the author of the novel tick. I wouldn’t make that mistake.
KW says: “Dick says, “No women allowed” just like he said “for men by men”. What part of that has anything to do with women, besides “Go away Females”? But women seem to be so self-centered that ALL things are “about” them, personally, even when it is not.”
Point taken. A website called “men are better than women” is only about men.
KW said: “His articles are never meant to upset women, that would imply that men here actually care what women think, like everywhere else. THEY are not the primary concern HERE, though every single woman that posts always seems to take it to heart, simply because they can’t understand why THEY are not the center of attention, and so in their insanity and reality, they must speak about it.”
You’re right here. By implying that Dick cares whether his articles upset women or not, I was attributing compassionate feelings to him that I shouldn’t have. My mistake.
KW said: “This is an educational site, for men, by men, about women. But we never lack for self-obsessed women who, with no real experience, or understanding, somehow “know better”.”
And now you’ve added one more self-obsessed woman to your list, because I’ve weakly taken the tempting bait and voiced opinions. Tut tut. It’s arrogant for any woman to assume she knows better about a man. A good point. However, women know a lot about what it’s like to be a woman so perhaps what we try unwittingly to do on this site is try and get men to better understand women. But because the content of this site upsets women (we’re emotional creatures after all), our emotions take over, and we perpetuate the male impression that women are hysterical morons. A pity.
KW said: “Curtsy only if you feel it necessary. And I stretched the Man-Logic so far on this one, there is ZERO possibility of it making sense.
Just like a woman.”
And just like a woman, I couldn’t let your arguments go unanswered:-)
Ok. I won’t miss you if you don’t participate. It is not a man-loss, but proves again that women are too lazy to do the hard stuff. In order to prove a point, you might consider actually working for it. People follow Leaders, not more followers.
You misunderstand Dick. NO woman understands real Dick. They don’t know what to make of Dick. So therefore……..they don’t know Dick.
Then again, to them, they are so lazy they don’t TRY…….
Dick says, “No women allowed” just like he said “for men by men”.
What part of that has anything to do with women, besides “Go away Females”? But women seem to be so self-centered that ALL things are “about” them, personally, even when it is not.
His articles are never meant to upset women, that would imply that men here actually care what women think, like everywhere else. THEY are not the primary concern HERE, though every single woman that posts always seems to take it to heart, simply because they can’t understand why THEY are not the center of attention, and so in their insanity and reality, they must speak about it.
This is an educational site, for men, by men, about women. But we never lack for self-obsessed women who, with no real experience, or understanding, somehow “know better”.
Curtsy only if you feel it necessary. And I stretched the Man-Logic so far on this one, there is ZERO possibility of it making sense.
Just like a woman.
Thanks, King Wang, but I really won’t participate in future. I was surfing the net, and I came across this article quite by chance. It did upset me, but I should have read the “About” section, written by Dick Masterson where he states “First let me say that this is a site by men and for men. That means no women allowed…” before making any comments. Clearly Dick must know that women find his articles upsetting and that’s why he cautions them not to read them. It’s entirely my fault that Danny, King Wang and MansVoice came down on me like a ton of bricks. I will gracefully make my bow now (or should that be curstey?) and leave this male site to the men. My apologies for intruding on your forum.
And double-posting because she doesn’t understand Man-Technology.
Feel free to actually participate, many women do, but very rarely is it an actual debate, or conversation that contains intelligence.
You are still projecting.
The definition of “misogynism” is “hatred of women”, so of course it hit a nerve, Danny! I won’t make any more comments, however, because as you say this is a site for men, and I was wrong to participate. Sorry about that.
The definition of “misogynism” is “hatred of women”, so of course it hit a nerve, Danny! I wpn’t make any more comments, however, because as you say it’s a site for men, and I was wrong to participate. Sorry about that.
And no one likes a generalization if it is:
(A) Right
(B) Right
Sounds like Dick strikes the FemiNazi-Nerve, but not the intelligent one, just the Bitch Nerve they have in the back of their throats.
No, Alissa, you are silly for thinking (A)your comment was needed OR wanted (B) that this is a co-ed site (C) that you have anything to say, except obviously to speak because you can and (D) any man here doesn’t have a “Bitch” nerve that constantly sings when yet ANOTHER bonehead female stops by to offer complete and utter shit as “Fact” and/or “Truth”.
She is projecting her Tourettes onto others by speaking longer, louder and above all, faster.
As always, these gals make Dick’s job easier by proving the point, over and over and over…………..
Only if somehow, we Man-Geniuses could get these no-grey matter females to understand that personal opinion does NOT equal:
Fact
Truth
History
Society
Common Sense
Higher Education
A REAL Argument
Reality
Any of the Above
Clearly this website hit a nerve, otherwise you wouldn’t have resorted to calling it misogynistic. Did you ever stop to think that you were projecting your dislike of yourself onto people with a different opinion? Only someone who hates herself could hate other people so much.
Clearly I hit a nerve, otherwise you wouldn’t have resorted to calling me names. Did you ever stop to think that you are projecting your dislike of yourself onto women? Only someone who hates himself could hate other people so much.
Fine then leave this site.
Don’t bother making a thousands posts, we don’t give a shit. Fuck off whore.
Ah, my apologies, Dick. I’ve just realised something. Your website must be a finely tuned form of satire.
Satire is defined thus: “a literary composition, in verse or prose, in which human folly and vice are held up to scorn, derision, or ridicule.”
You are clearly satirising misogynism and obviously having a good laugh into the bargain at all the indignant responses you receive. I was silly to take it seriously!
Quoting: “The Career Woman is like that guy in Short Circuit. Not that guy; that robot. He can’t do anything right, it takes two other guys to babysit him all day, and before he learned his lesson he caused about ten million dollars in property damage.”
What vitriol! It’s quite unbelievable. I personally do not favour generalisations. I’ve worked with men and women, and I’ve known lazy women, and lazy men, and hard-working women and hard-working men. It’s never good to categorise people to the extent that you make a sweeping assumption about an entire gender. I’m a hard worker, I can’t multi-task (even though I’m a woman), and I like to focus on one task at a time. I’m an individual. And I see other people as individuals.
Clearly the writer of this article has serious problems. Misogynism isn’t something to aspire to, and a website called “www.menarebetterthanwomen.com” was clearly created by someone who probably is too frightened to vent his spleen face to face with a woman, so he uses the anonymity of the internet to get a false sense of power over women.
Well said. Men are better than women.
Indeed. My own theory on womens “multitasking” is this -When they were perpetually pregnant cave whores with a different annoying baby on their hip each year, they evolved a rudimentary ability to cook using their free arm, whilst the other arm was engaged holding the baby on.
Over a million years and more, this evolved into observable differences in the development of Male vs female brains. While the specific mechanisms of evolution are extremely interesting, particularly at the genetic level, it is sufficient to say here that human brains are not the same between genders, and that there are verifiable reasons for it.
The 2 hemispheres of a human brain are connected only by a finger sized conduit which differs in thickness between males and females. In males it is around the size of the average little finger, in females it is like an average thumb. This is the “corpus collossum”.
Women immediately jump to the conclusion that it means they “use both sides of our brain” better than Men, and “we can multitask, you can’t”. This is simply an illusion which is not supported by the facts.
They overlook that specialisation of brain function in Males is enhanced by this smaller sized Corpus Collossum, resulting in superior capability of specialised regions within the Male brain. The results are seen in most areas of human endeavour, where the highest achievers and innovators…are predominantly Male. As stated elsewhere on this site, there ARE no female Mozarts, Galileo’s or Hawkings.
Some outraged woman will probably come on here and bleat about an exception to the rule that she thinks proves “equality” of the genders.
It doesn’t. The real world provides all the evidence needed to dismiss such irrational conclusions.
Even with a million years of practice, women are still generally lousy cooks. If they can’t even get THAT right, anything more complicated is just a pipe dream.
LMFAO. So true man. I was directing a Project work group of mine and told a woman her work was crap and she got all “sensitive” blah blah and bitchy etc. What a load of bullshit. Everyone testified she did crappy work… but I shoved it in her fucking face that she did crap. She was stunned as I told her that …but I am a man and its not my policy to lie and hide around the bush like some woman. Damn bitch.
Women do not belong in management or the workplace.
First post, and on a favourite topic of mine!
Women can indeed multi task, it’s true, but so can men. The difference is that men don’t want to lower ourselves to womens standards, for example:
I would personally define multi-tasking as performing more than one mediocre task to a substandard level at one time, which I can quite easily do.
Being a man however, I would much rather perform one more important or technical task, to a much high standard.
What really gets me is that women seem to think they have some “advantage” over men because of this “ability”…
Congratulations women, you can perform lots of half-arsed tasks badly.
Max
Basicly the definition of feminism
and my list only refers to the three typical types of women in failed relationships.
Ms. I’mPowerful is usually an incessant nagger, and I would place her under the umbrealla of Ms. Nagatha.
Diametik, I’m busting a gut laughing at your Three Types of Women! VERYYY true, too.
Although, I think maybe you forgot one: Ms.I’mPowerful— this is the one who “catches” a man acting demure, comely and loving and then once married/attached tells him that HER needs and HER career (especially if she’s making nice money) are more important than his…NO compromise necessary, dude.
1. Ms. Settler = This is the one that does everything possible to get the man, and as soon as she thinks she’s trapped him (with marriage, children or both) she gets comfortable and lets herself go. These women are usually replaced by a more recent model (a.k.a. younger and prettier chicks).
2. Ms. Needy = This is the chick who relies on you for her happiness and her entertainment. She needs to have you around her constantly, and she expects you to de everything for her. She is the type that calls you every five minutes, and then stays silent on the other end, but expecting you to do the talking. This same woman then gets upset when you when you have nothing to say. She also expects you to be a damn mind-reader - here, she expects you to know things about her that she doesn’t even know herself.
3. Ms. Nagatha = She constantly complains.
@Diamatik: So, fill us in, what are the three types of women?
@Ubermensch: Dead on, man, I have worked in that kind of office, and I hit the street pronto. It’s better to not have a job than have to listen to that kind of shit.
How you drew that conclusion from my original comment, I have no idea.
Then again, you’re “Chantal the Feminist”, which pretty much answers that question, doesn’t it?
evileddy: Dude, I know precisely what you mean. Apparently, mothers don’t teach their daughters what my father taught me: “Excuses are bullshit. Only results matter.”
As always. I don’t ever get that shit anymore though. My views on women and relationships have always been clear to all my co-workers, so the ladies never approach me with any sob story.
In fact, when such discussions are going on, they usually come to an abrupt pause/end when I come around. Ever since that time I joined in on a discussion and gave an overview of the three typical types of women in failed relationships I guess I may have stuck a raw nerve there, and thus my opinion on matters of realtionships is not well revered here anymore.
Leave our treehouse alone!
I agree.
The women in my office are on the phone half the day with other women talking about stupid drama and personal shit.. I know more about the personal lives of these women than I ever cared to.
A planned 5 min stop in a woman’s office turns into a 10 min sob story of how she didn’t complete her work because her boyfriend and her had an argument last night about going to see a movie.. yet if I tell her I don’t care.. I just want to do my job.. off she goes crying to the boss saying I’m an insensitive bastard and doesn’t understand how hard it is for a single mom to be working and raising a child.
LAME
someone doesn’t like a woman challenging his manhood. hhahahaha
I have the great misfortune of working for a company that consists of 90+ women and five (maybe six) men, including myself. And it’s way past time for me to rant about it.
Up until I started working here, I actually believed the utter bullshit that women should be treated equally in the workplace, and that women were just as competent as men in said workplace. Oh, how wrong I was.
Women do not belong in administrative or high-level management positions. They just don’t. These are not positions which are conducive to any sort of emotional outburst at all, let alone a regular emotional tidal wave that happens every 28 days or so.
Women do not belong in positions of power over anyone other than their children. Because, if you’re a man with a woman for a boss, she will always treat you as if you’re a) her son, b) her husband or c) her father.
Without fucking fail.
She will never treat you as a co-worker or a friend. She won’t even treat you as an underling. You’ll always get: a) nagged incessently about how you’re irresponsible (a.ka.: treated as a son), b) nagged incessently about how you’re doing it wrong (husband), or c) shunned, avoided, and fucked over before you can theoretically fuck her over first. Because she’s still afraid of her Dad, and somehow equates you with Him. I can’t explain it, but it happens.
Five years of this shit. I’m not just talking out my ass here. It happens every fucking day. Every other man who works here (or who worked here then quit) has noticed this as well.
By the same token, every woman you work with expects you to treat her like she’s: a) a princess, b) your favorite girlfriend or c) your Mom.
Sorry, you’re not any of those things. You’re a fucking co-worker, and you will always be treated like one from me.
Women coworkers will also use the same excuse over and over again: “Get used to it; you’re working with a woman, and we’re emotional.”
I hear this shit all the time. A female coworker bitches about me to my (female) supervisor, and I talk to the supervisor to rebut the baseless complaints. The answer is *always* “Get used to it…you’re working with a bunch of women. We’re emotional.”
What if I were to put my fist in someone’s mouth, then say, “Get used to it, you’re working with a Man. This is how we solve disputes.”
Equality my hairy ass.
Every single complaint a female co-worker has ever had against me has been because I’ve somehow hurt her fucking feelings. Not because I’ve done something wrong in my job. Not because I’ve made a mistake. Not even because I’ve been an asshole.
Because, somehow, I said or did something that “hurt her feelings”. 95% of the time, this was the direct result of me not putting her priorities above my own and/or everyone else’s in the company. I have shit I need to do. Walking into my office and smiling at me while you bitch about your problems isn’t going to make me drop everything and make it all better for you.
I’m not your fucking husband. I’m not your fucking Dad.
We all have a bunch of shit piled up on our plates that we need to take care of. Stop batting your eyelashes and/or getting bitchy behind my back when I won’t put your shit in front of my own. Harden The Fuck Up and get your shit done. That’s why it’s called “A Job” and not “A Date”.
For Fuck’s Sake.
Let this be a warning to Men Everywhere: when you’re job-hunting, be damned sure to check two things before you get hired:
1: The men-to-women ratio at the place you’re trying to get hired on, and
2: Check whether or not your boss is a woman.
Trust me: these things are well worth looking into.
“japanese anime”
is there another kind?
“Women and men are biologically inferior to women male violence is a biological inevitability”
women are inferior to themselves?
“Men are better human beings than women.”
Not me, but to balance it out, I’m better at being evil.
“No more rape trails based solely on circumstantial evidence and the testimony of the one and only witness, the said whore.”
If they can trick the judge into thinking they are telling the truth, it’s their right to do so. But I would advise against it if it doesn’t get them anything.
“No more wearing short skirts and halter tops, walking around in your platform shoes and trying to act like you can look down to people taller, smarter, stronger, bigger, and just better than you without being laughed at.”
It wouldn’t be so bad if they actually had a reason to think they were better, but sadly, they don’t seem to.
“blah blah marriage blah blah”
marriage is just a stupid party.
Got a little off topic with “Dr. Z” trying to create an analogy -
About Sonyad’s comment that gender while coming from the male is largely determined by the female.
I corrected the analogy to something a bit more accurate.
Then saying who you adress the question to might be a good idea, Female. I, for one, do not play guessing games, and I figure not many of the men here do, either.
…what the fuck are we talking about? Speak properly.
That was a terrible attempt at an analogy, as you point out Sonyad. But it’s a woman attempting to weild logic - swing and a miss!
It isn’t about whether the bullets hit or miss the target but what effect the target material has on that bullet. A steel target, the bullet flattens and possibly no penetration. A paper target … you get the point. The vaginas PH has a considerable effect on the “bullets”.
Oh, come on, Dick. Of course, women can multi-task. And some are particularly good at it.
Why, just yesterday at the gym, I actually witnessed some little harpy sit on one of the back-strengthening machines for 30mns, text-messaging her friends, and giggling - all at the same time!
Astounding. She probably even farted at least once during that time, and perhaps had two or three pussy contractions!
Wonders never cease!
And even then, the main differentiating factor is the timeline for intercourse with the various partners.
First ‘come’ most likely first served.
- ladytron - beauty 2
As far as I know, sperm results from haploid division there’s basically one sex chromosome x spermatozoa for each sex chromosome y spermatozoa.
Whether one or the other of any one pair of spermatozoa makes it to fertilisation as well as which of the plenitude of pairs will see one of its cells succeed is really mainly up to chance.
Motility and alkaline pH can only matter so much for so long and don’t really vary that much in sperm.
Also, the relevancy of motility and/or pH is arguably mute as a natural selection enabling indication of the viability and quality of the genetic material within.
So it’s arguably the women’s body that selects the gender. Be it even only through happenstance.
Your argument doesn’t hold water unless sperm competition for fertilisation between multiple intercourse partners is what you had in mind.
- paul oakenfold - feed your mind featuring spitfire-nvs
You really shouldn’t be addressing anyone here. You’re not welcome. Only a stupid female would hang out where they are unwanted.
I wasn’t addressing the question to you, obviously.
Because I give a fuck about marriage why?
Why would you think someone who doesn’t even put up with females for an hour of sex would want to put up with one for a lifetime?
and what about married men? Do you think they should also wear condoms to protect themselves from diseases and/or to decrease their partner’s health risks?
What? Wearing plastic is just common sense. And if a whore has unprotected sex, I believe that she deserves whatever she has coming, and the sooner she’s out of the gene pool, the better. Really, what more is a whore than a disease trap?
It’s just like taking a trip to Chernobyl. It’s going to be fun as hell, yes, but wear your damn protection!
Well you’re wrong. I meant dissatisfying for the men who have to wear them, and if it is true that unprotected sex is correlated with higher rates of cervical cancer in women, then this perhaps would lead to widespread condom use, even in marriages, which I found a strange thing for sots to be ecstatic over.
I’m not impinging condom usage on anyone. People are responsible for themselves. I was, however, suggesting that there might actually exist some responsible married men who may consider their partner’s health and choose to wear condoms, clearly you will not be one of those men.
And to think, I never would have known that had I not started this site.
-Dick
She’s not just representative of radical feminism of the 70’s. She was instrumental in Canada passing a pornography law that prohibits anything can be construed as “degrading” to women. I don’t need to tell you all how ambiguous and subjective that is.
My point is that she’s still making her horrible misandristic influence felt, even more horribly in the form of law.
As an aside, I remember watching Andrea Dworkin and Al Goldstein (publisher of Screw magazine) being interviewed by Tom Snyder. Al was perfectly composed and articulate while his counterpart threw a shredded copy of his magazine at him, raved incoherently and spouted insults. Really a high point for women’s rights. She looked entirely the stereotype of the fat, ugly, man-hating lesbian feminist ideologue that eventually took over the women’s liberation movement.
I realize that full well sonyad, but she was trying to get me to give a fuck that her disease spreading sisters might give spread their pestilence to one of my fellow men.
And yet, anyone who marries a whore is hardly a man.
More like a cuckold.
Let’s play a game of reverse-the-gender-roles. True equality. Let’s see some of Dick’s stuff get published on a major newspaper. It’s actually based in reality, and not just some whiny hormonal rant… oh, wait, the double-standard. But that isn’t equal.
It appears we will have to phase out all the privilages of young girls until we can finally arrive at a mutually beneficial solution. That means:
No more rape trails based solely on circumstantial evidence and the testimony of the one and only witness, the said whore.
No more running your mouth without any fear of reprocussions - because you should have been born male, you know.
No more wearing short skirts and halter tops, walking around in your platform shoes and trying to act like you can look down to people taller, smarter, stronger, bigger, and just better than you without being laughed at.
Well, I say we start today. I know that I’ve stopped using the double-standard and reclaimed my body from the feminazis. I can take a good look at an exposed rack without any fear of reprocussions because if anyone asks, they’re my eyes. I can have several different girls at the same time because I was born male. I made a good decision based on logic and reason, not fetishes and perversion.
I believe Female meant unhealthy for women, the providers of sexual gratifications and fellatios.
Thus the feminist and womanly characteristic of arbitrary imposition on others and impinging on their rights and free will. With condoms, in this case.
Or do you believe she and her feminist kin give even a flying fuck for men’s health issues?
- David Morales - Better that you leave ft Lea Lorien
I knew Andrea Dworkin to be an radical feminist from the 70s, which is why I said “many” were probably taken from that era, the others I was unfamiliar with.
The “crazy with no support” comment was in reference to the female journalist who claimed women were genetically superior, and who celebrated the fact that men die earlier and commit suicide at greater rates. I can’t fathom any woman I know finding that anything but incredibly offensive, let alone agreeing with it or stating it, so in that sense those types of comments don’t have support. The fact that something like that could be printed in a newspaper, however, is shocking to me.
Nope. The 1990’s. Thirty years after what you suggest. And radical feminism is at a peak of influence in the supreme courts of many western countries.
@Alex, you’re an intelligent woman. I’m dismayed you’d try and slip out of this with a “oh that was in the 60’s” when TEN seconds of googling would reveal otherwise. I don’t know if you’re dishonest or just don’t want to know the truth. Since you’ve repeatedly engaged sincerely on this site I’ll assume it’s an overlook.
A cover story in Time Magazine? You have a strange definition of “no support”.
Let’s quote from that story: