Multi-Task? Don’t Make Me Multi-Laugh — Or Multi-Shit.
I was sent this question by a reader:
In the beginning, when God made men and women, it was pretty simple. God made men strong and smart so they could hunt and he made women to carry children, cook and clean. Then as women realized how much greater men were they started to attempt manly jobs. Now, women get pissed at men because they have to do their day job then come home and do what God intended for them to. What do you think?
The reason women are so fucked in their heads these days is because they invented The Career Woman. The Career Woman is like that guy in Short Circuit. Not that guy; that robot. He can’t do anything right, it takes two other guys to babysit him all day, and before he learned his lesson he caused about ten million dollars in property damage. Go watch that film with an insurance adjuster. He’ll tell you.
That’s women for you.
God certainly did make men strong and smart. God made mankind in his own image. If I had to make the opposite of a man in my own image, then I wouldn’t know what the fuck to do. If I was God, I guess I would make her totally incompetent and rude. I would also make her hate facial hair. How fucking annoying.
Women will always have to cook and clean. Ask any married woman and she’ll tell you the same thing, “I don’t mind cooking and cleaning and doing laundry for my family.” Good. Then shut up and do it because men do mind that kind of brainless shit. We’ve minded since we invented having a job.
Over the course of a million years, men have evolved into problem solvers par excellence. When out hunting woolly mammoths, men had to invent shit on the fly like flanking and sign language and the Half Nelson. Women didn’t have to evolve any of that shit into their brains. And that’s exactly the stuff we men use every day at work. It’s the extra 30 cents on the dollar women are always complaining about. When women try to match men in the job market, they’re not jumping into the deep end, they’re diving into the Grand Canyon with water wings strapped to their ankles.
Yet women still have to do the cooking and the cleaning. What are men going to do it? What next? Use the television to prop the door open and draw reruns of Coach on the doorstop? Don’t be absurd. Everything has a purpose.
Women’s purpose is to tidy up. That’s what you evolve by sitting in a cave for a million years and waiting for food to come home. You evolve the fucking invaluable skill set of tidying and fucking obsessing about tidying. Women can escape their curse of tidying as much as men can escape their curse of taking care of business and making shitloads of money. We’re fucking televisions and doorstops in here. You can use a television to hold your door open, but why the fuck would you do that?
Well you would if you were a Career Woman. You’d hold doors open from 9-5 and then come home and do the dishes like you were supposed to in the first place. That’s not multi-tasking, it’s just stupid and exhausting.
Men are better than women because we don’t think the grass is greener on the other side. We’re men. We’ve got the greenest grass in the whole fucking universe. We’ve got grass as green as 100 dollar bills.
Related Articles:
August 14th, 2007 at 12:45 pm - IP Man-Hash: 6b5d8a918eeec
Basicly the definition of feminism
August 31st, 2007 at 6:06 am - IP Man-Hash: 4730c1f9a8124
First post, and on a favourite topic of mine!
Women can indeed multi task, it’s true, but so can men. The difference is that men don’t want to lower ourselves to womens standards, for example:
I would personally define multi-tasking as performing more than one mediocre task to a substandard level at one time, which I can quite easily do.
Being a man however, I would much rather perform one more important or technical task, to a much high standard.
What really gets me is that women seem to think they have some “advantage” over men because of this “ability”…
Congratulations women, you can perform lots of half-arsed tasks badly.
Max
August 31st, 2007 at 6:22 am - IP Man-Hash: a8014d2ff3afb
LMFAO. So true man. I was directing a Project work group of mine and told a woman her work was crap and she got all “sensitive” blah blah and bitchy etc. What a load of bullshit. Everyone testified she did crappy work… but I shoved it in her fucking face that she did crap. She was stunned as I told her that …but I am a man and its not my policy to lie and hide around the bush like some woman. Damn bitch.
Women do not belong in management or the workplace.
September 4th, 2007 at 6:07 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5556903c41ed8
Indeed. My own theory on womens “multitasking” is this -When they were perpetually pregnant cave whores with a different annoying baby on their hip each year, they evolved a rudimentary ability to cook using their free arm, whilst the other arm was engaged holding the baby on.
Over a million years and more, this evolved into observable differences in the development of Male vs female brains. While the specific mechanisms of evolution are extremely interesting, particularly at the genetic level, it is sufficient to say here that human brains are not the same between genders, and that there are verifiable reasons for it.
The 2 hemispheres of a human brain are connected only by a finger sized conduit which differs in thickness between males and females. In males it is around the size of the average little finger, in females it is like an average thumb. This is the “corpus collossum”.
Women immediately jump to the conclusion that it means they “use both sides of our brain” better than Men, and “we can multitask, you can’t”. This is simply an illusion which is not supported by the facts.
They overlook that specialisation of brain function in Males is enhanced by this smaller sized Corpus Collossum, resulting in superior capability of specialised regions within the Male brain. The results are seen in most areas of human endeavour, where the highest achievers and innovators…are predominantly Male. As stated elsewhere on this site, there ARE no female Mozarts, Galileo’s or Hawkings.
Some outraged woman will probably come on here and bleat about an exception to the rule that she thinks proves “equality” of the genders.
It doesn’t. The real world provides all the evidence needed to dismiss such irrational conclusions.
Even with a million years of practice, women are still generally lousy cooks. If they can’t even get THAT right, anything more complicated is just a pipe dream.
September 4th, 2007 at 8:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: a8014d2ff3afb
Well said. Men are better than women.
February 2nd, 2008 at 4:30 am - IP Man-Hash: 8231ecaf9cfe2
Quoting: “The Career Woman is like that guy in Short Circuit. Not that guy; that robot. He can’t do anything right, it takes two other guys to babysit him all day, and before he learned his lesson he caused about ten million dollars in property damage.”
What vitriol! It’s quite unbelievable. I personally do not favour generalisations. I’ve worked with men and women, and I’ve known lazy women, and lazy men, and hard-working women and hard-working men. It’s never good to categorise people to the extent that you make a sweeping assumption about an entire gender. I’m a hard worker, I can’t multi-task (even though I’m a woman), and I like to focus on one task at a time. I’m an individual. And I see other people as individuals.
Clearly the writer of this article has serious problems. Misogynism isn’t something to aspire to, and a website called “www.menarebetterthanwomen.com” was clearly created by someone who probably is too frightened to vent his spleen face to face with a woman, so he uses the anonymity of the internet to get a false sense of power over women.
February 2nd, 2008 at 4:45 am - IP Man-Hash: 8231ecaf9cfe2
Ah, my apologies, Dick. I’ve just realised something. Your website must be a finely tuned form of satire.
Satire is defined thus: “a literary composition, in verse or prose, in which human folly and vice are held up to scorn, derision, or ridicule.”
You are clearly satirising misogynism and obviously having a good laugh into the bargain at all the indignant responses you receive. I was silly to take it seriously!
February 2nd, 2008 at 7:01 am - IP Man-Hash: 5acb8d5dc39dd
Fine then leave this site.
Don’t bother making a thousands posts, we don’t give a shit. Fuck off whore.
February 2nd, 2008 at 2:21 pm - IP Man-Hash: 8231ecaf9cfe2
Clearly I hit a nerve, otherwise you wouldn’t have resorted to calling me names. Did you ever stop to think that you are projecting your dislike of yourself onto women? Only someone who hates himself could hate other people so much.
February 2nd, 2008 at 2:58 pm - IP Man-Hash: eae6840fabe35
Clearly this website hit a nerve, otherwise you wouldn’t have resorted to calling it misogynistic. Did you ever stop to think that you were projecting your dislike of yourself onto people with a different opinion? Only someone who hates herself could hate other people so much.
February 2nd, 2008 at 3:16 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0a379370a5fd8
No, Alissa, you are silly for thinking (A)your comment was needed OR wanted (B) that this is a co-ed site (C) that you have anything to say, except obviously to speak because you can and (D) any man here doesn’t have a “Bitch” nerve that constantly sings when yet ANOTHER bonehead female stops by to offer complete and utter shit as “Fact” and/or “Truth”.
She is projecting her Tourettes onto others by speaking longer, louder and above all, faster.
As always, these gals make Dick’s job easier by proving the point, over and over and over…………..
Only if somehow, we Man-Geniuses could get these no-grey matter females to understand that personal opinion does NOT equal:
Fact
Truth
History
Society
Common Sense
Higher Education
A REAL Argument
Reality
Any of the Above
February 2nd, 2008 at 3:17 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0a379370a5fd8
And no one likes a generalization if it is:
(A) Right
(B) Right
Sounds like Dick strikes the FemiNazi-Nerve, but not the intelligent one, just the Bitch Nerve they have in the back of their throats.
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:23 am - IP Man-Hash: 8231ecaf9cfe2
The definition of “misogynism” is “hatred of women”, so of course it hit a nerve, Danny! I wpn’t make any more comments, however, because as you say it’s a site for men, and I was wrong to participate. Sorry about that.
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:23 am - IP Man-Hash: 8231ecaf9cfe2
The definition of “misogynism” is “hatred of women”, so of course it hit a nerve, Danny! I won’t make any more comments, however, because as you say this is a site for men, and I was wrong to participate. Sorry about that.
February 3rd, 2008 at 12:45 am - IP Man-Hash: eae6840fabe35
You are still projecting.
February 3rd, 2008 at 1:01 am - IP Man-Hash: 0a379370a5fd8
And double-posting because she doesn’t understand Man-Technology.
Feel free to actually participate, many women do, but very rarely is it an actual debate, or conversation that contains intelligence.
February 3rd, 2008 at 7:10 am - IP Man-Hash: 8231ecaf9cfe2
Thanks, King Wang, but I really won’t participate in future. I was surfing the net, and I came across this article quite by chance. It did upset me, but I should have read the “About” section, written by Dick Masterson where he states “First let me say that this is a site by men and for men. That means no women allowed…” before making any comments. Clearly Dick must know that women find his articles upsetting and that’s why he cautions them not to read them. It’s entirely my fault that Danny, King Wang and MansVoice came down on me like a ton of bricks. I will gracefully make my bow now (or should that be curstey?) and leave this male site to the men. My apologies for intruding on your forum.
February 3rd, 2008 at 6:18 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0a379370a5fd8
Ok. I won’t miss you if you don’t participate. It is not a man-loss, but proves again that women are too lazy to do the hard stuff. In order to prove a point, you might consider actually working for it. People follow Leaders, not more followers.
You misunderstand Dick. NO woman understands real Dick. They don’t know what to make of Dick. So therefore……..they don’t know Dick.
Then again, to them, they are so lazy they don’t TRY…….
Dick says, “No women allowed” just like he said “for men by men”.
What part of that has anything to do with women, besides “Go away Females”? But women seem to be so self-centered that ALL things are “about” them, personally, even when it is not.
His articles are never meant to upset women, that would imply that men here actually care what women think, like everywhere else. THEY are not the primary concern HERE, though every single woman that posts always seems to take it to heart, simply because they can’t understand why THEY are not the center of attention, and so in their insanity and reality, they must speak about it.
This is an educational site, for men, by men, about women. But we never lack for self-obsessed women who, with no real experience, or understanding, somehow “know better”.
Curtsy only if you feel it necessary. And I stretched the Man-Logic so far on this one, there is ZERO possibility of it making sense.
Just like a woman.
February 3rd, 2008 at 10:47 pm - IP Man-Hash: 8231ecaf9cfe2
KW said: “Ok. I won’t miss you if you don’t participate. It is not a man-loss, but proves again that women are too lazy to do the hard stuff. In order to prove a point, you might consider actually working for it. People follow Leaders, not more followers.”
You won’t miss me? Hmmm. Then why did you bother to write such a long response? A provocative response, I might add, which is meant to annoy the “woman” in me as woman can’t shut up, they always need to prove their point, and by responding (as you probably knew I would) you can now say “See - you said you wouldn’t participate, but now you have. What a typical woman response from a woman. You’re inconsistent and lacking Man qualities of reticence.”
KW said: “You misunderstand Dick. NO woman understands real Dick. They don’t know what to make of Dick. So therefore……..they don’t know Dick. Then again, to them, they are so lazy they don’t TRY…….”
No - I don’t understand Dick. If I pretended I did I would be lying. How can anyone know or understand someone by their writings? It’s like an author creating a main character in a novel (an alter ego perhaps), and a reader then believing that they understand everything about what makes the author of the novel tick. I wouldn’t make that mistake.
KW says: “Dick says, “No women allowed” just like he said “for men by men”. What part of that has anything to do with women, besides “Go away Females”? But women seem to be so self-centered that ALL things are “about” them, personally, even when it is not.”
Point taken. A website called “men are better than women” is only about men.
KW said: “His articles are never meant to upset women, that would imply that men here actually care what women think, like everywhere else. THEY are not the primary concern HERE, though every single woman that posts always seems to take it to heart, simply because they can’t understand why THEY are not the center of attention, and so in their insanity and reality, they must speak about it.”
You’re right here. By implying that Dick cares whether his articles upset women or not, I was attributing compassionate feelings to him that I shouldn’t have. My mistake.
KW said: “This is an educational site, for men, by men, about women. But we never lack for self-obsessed women who, with no real experience, or understanding, somehow “know better”.”
And now you’ve added one more self-obsessed woman to your list, because I’ve weakly taken the tempting bait and voiced opinions. Tut tut. It’s arrogant for any woman to assume she knows better about a man. A good point. However, women know a lot about what it’s like to be a woman so perhaps what we try unwittingly to do on this site is try and get men to better understand women. But because the content of this site upsets women (we’re emotional creatures after all), our emotions take over, and we perpetuate the male impression that women are hysterical morons. A pity.
KW said: “Curtsy only if you feel it necessary. And I stretched the Man-Logic so far on this one, there is ZERO possibility of it making sense.
Just like a woman.”
And just like a woman, I couldn’t let your arguments go unanswered:-)
February 4th, 2008 at 4:36 am - IP Man-Hash: 1de19318c8883
Why haven’t you fucked off already?