Children Are Not Pinatas
Click below to get Dick in your Ear and listen to the podcast of this article.
Child abuse is one of the most shepugnant acts of violence known to man. It’s wrong for the same reason it’s wrong to beat up crippled people. They can’t fight back. That’s also why it’s wrong for fat ladies to squeeze themselves into anything that couldn’t be packaged and resold as a tent. No one can fight that.
There should be no size 4, 6, or 8. If you can’t fit into a 2, cut a hole in the bottom of a trash bag and throw yourself away.
All women suffer from a form of female narcissistic personality disorder, FNPD for short. Here are a summary of the symptoms:
1. Being loud and obnoxious.
2. Speaking when they don’t know what the fuck they’re talking about.
3. Beating the shit out of children.
That sums up every woman in the world.
Also: can’t drive for shit.
In the wild animal kingdom, mothers eat their babies all the time. Hamsters do it. So do fe-weasels and woman-guinea pigs. One of my friends had some gerbils when we were younger and it happened right in front of our very own eyes.
Men are better than women.
In a recent study, it was discovered that the wives of American soldiers are twice as likely to beat their kids and four times as likely to neglect them while their husbands are overseas fighting for the freedoms that make that kind of atrocious behavior possible. The neglect I can understand. Women would forget to feed themselves if men weren’t around to take them out. But the abuse?
Just like putting them on a leash, having a man around keeps women in line.
Here are some government statistics that will send you running to the pet store.
Women are 36% more likely to abuse children than men.
41% of child abuse victims were maltreated by mothers acting alone, compared to a low and manly 19% for fathers.
In the age range of 20 to 29, women are twice as likely than men to abuse their children.
Anyone with a penis will tell you that the younger women are, the more abusive and dumber they are. If teenagers had kids more often, child abuse would be so prevalent there would be no more racism. Everyone would just be black and blue.
Here are the results of a study I financed and undertook personally.
100% of women’s bodies turn to shit after they give birth.
I have a friend who would have been a pro footballer except late in a pre-season game, he blew his knee out. It was never the same and he blamed this blown knee for his ruined football career.
Now, if he had had absolutely no other prospects in life, and if he could have given birth to that knee, he might have smacked it around. However, as women so frequently and arrogantly remind us, men can’t give birth.
Men are better than women.
If women were my friend, football was their bodies, and grinning idiot kids were the weak knee that ended an illustrious career as a third stringer, the reasons for women and their out of control child abuse become painfully obvious.
When women aren’t thinking about their ridiculous sexual fantasies, they spend their day either beating children or thinking about beating children. That violence is all they have left after giving birth to a football that ruins their vaginas and turns their C-cups into tube socks. That’s why women in their 20’s beat children at remarkably higher rates. At that age, they have the most to lose.
Just because women can have babies doesn’t mean they should, and it definitely doesn’t mean they should raise them. We don’t put cops in prison. We don’t give fat kids schoolbooks printed on donuts. We don’t dress up in Bid Bird costumes, beat the fuck out of some German shepherds and then drop them off at a kid’s party.
It’s reckless and insane.
Army Child Abuse
Women More Likely To Go To Hell
Women Acting Alone
Women In Their 20’s Are The Worst
Related Articles:
Pages: « 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 [1] Show All
By the way, all you whiny feminists, you can learn alot from KellyMac.
Honestly, even I find myself being made smarter reading her stuff.
With the rest of you, my brain slowly trickles away.
Honestly you wasted your time on that? While you were writing that 5 african children just died of starvation.
Their meat is needed for KFC, McDonalds and Burger King!
Exceptionally well put Catherine. Thank you for taking the time to write such thoughtful commentary.
Ah, KellyMac, you know you’re right about the values and expectations of a lot of girls these days. But I don’t thinks it’s gender-related. Teens and twentysomethings in general seem to think they deserve the world handed to them on a silver platter (I can say that now that I’m safely out of my twenties). I think what you’re asking for is simply for people to treat each other with respect. Funny thing to say on a site like this eh? :) The thing is, I don’t watch much television, and I actually don’t spend too much time surfing the web (well, not as much as it probably seems on this site, anyway), and every time I do I’m appalled to the same level you are. Yet, when I look around (and I do work on a college campus, so I see alot of younger people) things aren’t actually as bad as some media sources make them out to be. The whole world is not a Jerry Springer show.
I think these guys - heck MOST guys - spend too much time oogling boobies on MySpace instead of taking a good look around at what’s really out there. It IS possible (judging from some of these posts) that they are so socially inept that they’ve never had a good interaction with a girl. But if so, I’m sure if they took the time to notice, they’ve never really had a good interaction with ANYONE.
We don’t disagree, really - you and I. My boyfriend is a happy man, and I work hard to keep him that way. He does the same. And while I would have resented being forced to stay at home had I married at a younger age (I’m contrary that way ; ) I’m not opposed to staying home, if that’s what makes the most sense. And by sense, I don’t mean the kind of sense the guys on here display. :)
Careful what you wish for though. My mother was a very traditional woman, and ended up the victim of a poor provider, who compounded his near uselessness by being mentally abusive, and a social system that did not allow for her to provide for us herself. She stayed for years in a hurtful and loveless marriage because she couldn’t leave us, her children, and she couldn’t leave him unless she left us too. And I have reason to believe that for women of her generation, this was not an isolated event.
My mother did all the things that the system you advocate told her to do and fully expected she would receive the things that were promised in kind. She did not.
I agree that divorce should be equitable and fair, and that children should never be used as pawns in a struggle for power or money. But when you come right down to it, as things stand right now in this country, most women ARE still the primary caregivers for the children. We’re in a funny way right now - I believe divorce WAS meant to protect the women, assuming that they would come out of a marriage with no marketable skills in the workforce since they had been at home tending the children. Obviously it’s not always the case now (and when I’m not playing devil’s advocate I’ve been known to remark upon the fact that in some cases courts have been known to force men to pay more than their ex wives had even requested). So I believe your site is a step in the right direction (but really, back off the feminists a bit - they really did some good stuff!). But I can’t help but think of my mother’s situation when you say that things are fucked up now. I made some effort to not ever be in her situation - making sure that I have the skills necessary to support a family, should I ever need to, be it due to death or divorce. Fifty years ago the opportunity to do so might have been there, but trying for it would have overwhelming to me. (Don’t want to gripe, but I haven’t exactly been a member of a privileged class.)
I think I should be applauded, myself. :) Why wouldn’t a guy like to know that his wife could support herself and their children alone if he happened to die young?
Anyway, enough of all that seriousness. Back to poking at these guys with a stick. They’re going to to be so mad that this post is so long!
Nothing is 100%. Extreme statements are not logical.
And, to say that EVERY WOMAN’s body “turns to shit” after childbirth is not correct. Some of us exercise, take care of ourselves and actually often look better after children. Genes cab play a part as well.It’s very individual. And, NO, not every good looking older gal with kids has had surgery, either.
I must take issue with one statement…that 100% of women’s bodies turn to shit after they give birth. Exception that proves the rule kind of athing, really.
Brooke Burke. That hot MILF is frigging even hotter now, and she’s just popped out kid number three early this year.
Surgery - pioneered by men, of course - has kept her in a totally fuckable state. Ergo - Men are better than women. I just know that logic works, I just don’t feel like showing my work.
And Catherine? You are a humorless, dry twat with a hint of mustiness about you. Metaphorically, intellectually and my guess would be physically as well.
That’s a good point, Catherine, and there certainly does seem to be a paradox there.
Two things: First, I’m not saying women should stay home and take care of their children, necessarily. It would be nice, but frankly it’s rarely possible. What I am saying is that women should make their home a haven for their family from the outside world. It’s kind of an intangible that I’m talking about. A man who has a woman he can rely on to be faithful to him, love him, feed him, sex him up regularly, back him, and not fight him 24/7, is a man who will battle the metaphorical dragon for her. It wouldn’t hurt for her to take care of herself physically, as well, if you see what I mean. You ask the guys on this site. They’ll tell you it’s true.
Second, women in our society are taught that they can do no wrong, and that they deserve to have anything and everything they want, when they want it. There’s no accountability, and no need for self-control. Society used to require women to have some personal responsibility, make good choices, and live with the consequences of those choices. Now, it’s just “You go gurrrrl! End patriarchy!!” In many ways, it means that women don’t really have to ever grow up and act like an adult. Children are a LOT of work. It takes sacrifice, and a high tolerance for frustration to be able to raise them. When you have the childish raising the child, very often with no man in the picture because he pissed her off, you wind up with some of the horrific things we hear of in the news.
Feminism is responsible for women believing we live in an oppressive patriarchy and constantly disrespecting and fighting men, and it is responsible for women having the emotional maturity of children. That’s the reason for the paradox.
Needless to say, a very thoughtful and responsible response. No wonder none of the other women who come to this site have chosen to respond.
If women would stay at home and tend to the children and teach others who to tend to them properly then the abuse stats would drop.
Cat you have no clue or logic.
That’s a good point, Catherine, and there certainly does seem to be a paradox there.
Two things: First, I’m not saying women should stay home and take care of their children, necessarily. It would be nice, but frankly it’s rarely possible. What I am saying is that women should make their home a haven for their family from the outside world. It’s kind of an intangible that I’m talking about. A man who has a woman he can rely on to be faithful to him, love him, feed him, sex him up regularly, back him, and not fight him 24/7, is a man who will battle the metaphorical dragon for her. It wouldn’t hurt for her to take care of herself physically, as well, if you see what I mean. You ask the guys on this site. They’ll tell you it’s true.
Second, women in our society are taught that they can do no wrong, and that they deserve to have anything and everything they want, when they want it. There’s no accountability, and no need for self-control. Society used to require women to have some personal responsibility, make good choices, and live with the consequences of those choices. Now, it’s just “You go gurrrrl! End patriarchy!!” In many ways, it means that women don’t really have to ever grow up and act like an adult. Children are a LOT of work. It takes sacrifice, and a high tolerance for frustration to be able to raise them. When you have the childish raising the child, very often with no man in the picture because he pissed her off, you wind up with some of the horrific things we hear of in the news.
Feminism is responsible for women believing we live in an oppressive patriarchy and constantly disrespecting and fighting men, and it is responsible for women having the emotional maturity of children. That’s the reason for the paradox.
There is no such thing as faulty logic. You are confusd because your womanly brain cannot comprehend logical thought; your poor head is overheating and ruining your hairdo.
KellyMac, I’m still sifting through your posts on the Germaine article for the the stuff I should give consideration to before replying, but I have a request for you. It’s actually an honest request, so please forgive me if the phrasing is blunt - I’m in a hurry.
Please correct me in my paraphrasing of my perception of your point of view:
Women should stay home and take care of their children, since they are better suited to it. This you believe despite the fact that you also believe women are the ones who beat their children [I'm not disputing that claim at this time]. And finally, despite the fact that women should be the primary caretakers of their children, when the marriage is broken, men should be given equal consideration for being the primary parent?
The logic is obviously faulty, so I’m seriously in saying that I assume I’ve misconstrued something somewhere. Please clear up my confusion.
Good piece. Supports the idea of the family unit, with a strong father. Too bad the lefties and feminists have tried to tell us otherwise for the past 20 years.
Incidentally, I wonder where lesbian couples with a kid fit into all of this. The whole idea, to me, is a little fucked-up, and I can only imagine what the kid will turn out like.
Dick, it is absolutely true that, in cases where a parent injures or kills a child, that parent is the mother the vast majority of the time. Which makes it just that much more crazy that mothers gain custody in cases of divorce almost by default. “In the best interests of the children”, my ass. I’m glad you addressed this issue, although I do take exception to your assertion that a woman bigger than a size 2 is too big. Think Mae West ;)
Of course, I’m only saying that because if you stripped all the flesh from my bones, I still doubt I would fit into a 2. Or a 4, 6, or 8. Well, maybe an 8 if it was just my bones…
Funny how they talk about pregnancy as if it were some sort of badge of honor even though they personally despise it more than anything. If I had a peso for every time a women on this site pulls the pregnancy card I would be one rich mother fucker. Also notice how every thread or Dickmasterpiece basically degenerates into some chick bringing this up. Sorry women but no man envies that, so stop talking like we do, or as if you deserve some kind of prize for it. Giving birth is the only thing women exist for in the first place, and your not even very good at it, winning by default gives no bragging rights.
Priceless.