Children Are Not Pinatas
Click below to get Dick in your Ear and listen to the podcast of this article.
Child abuse is one of the most shepugnant acts of violence known to man. It’s wrong for the same reason it’s wrong to beat up crippled people. They can’t fight back. That’s also why it’s wrong for fat ladies to squeeze themselves into anything that couldn’t be packaged and resold as a tent. No one can fight that.
There should be no size 4, 6, or 8. If you can’t fit into a 2, cut a hole in the bottom of a trash bag and throw yourself away.
All women suffer from a form of female narcissistic personality disorder, FNPD for short. Here are a summary of the symptoms:
1. Being loud and obnoxious.
2. Speaking when they don’t know what the fuck they’re talking about.
3. Beating the shit out of children.
That sums up every woman in the world.
Also: can’t drive for shit.
In the wild animal kingdom, mothers eat their babies all the time. Hamsters do it. So do fe-weasels and woman-guinea pigs. One of my friends had some gerbils when we were younger and it happened right in front of our very own eyes.
Men are better than women.
In a recent study, it was discovered that the wives of American soldiers are twice as likely to beat their kids and four times as likely to neglect them while their husbands are overseas fighting for the freedoms that make that kind of atrocious behavior possible. The neglect I can understand. Women would forget to feed themselves if men weren’t around to take them out. But the abuse?
Just like putting them on a leash, having a man around keeps women in line.
Here are some government statistics that will send you running to the pet store.
Women are 36% more likely to abuse children than men.
41% of child abuse victims were maltreated by mothers acting alone, compared to a low and manly 19% for fathers.
In the age range of 20 to 29, women are twice as likely than men to abuse their children.
Anyone with a penis will tell you that the younger women are, the more abusive and dumber they are. If teenagers had kids more often, child abuse would be so prevalent there would be no more racism. Everyone would just be black and blue.
Here are the results of a study I financed and undertook personally.
100% of women’s bodies turn to shit after they give birth.
I have a friend who would have been a pro footballer except late in a pre-season game, he blew his knee out. It was never the same and he blamed this blown knee for his ruined football career.
Now, if he had had absolutely no other prospects in life, and if he could have given birth to that knee, he might have smacked it around. However, as women so frequently and arrogantly remind us, men can’t give birth.
Men are better than women.
If women were my friend, football was their bodies, and grinning idiot kids were the weak knee that ended an illustrious career as a third stringer, the reasons for women and their out of control child abuse become painfully obvious.
When women aren’t thinking about their ridiculous sexual fantasies, they spend their day either beating children or thinking about beating children. That violence is all they have left after giving birth to a football that ruins their vaginas and turns their C-cups into tube socks. That’s why women in their 20’s beat children at remarkably higher rates. At that age, they have the most to lose.
Just because women can have babies doesn’t mean they should, and it definitely doesn’t mean they should raise them. We don’t put cops in prison. We don’t give fat kids schoolbooks printed on donuts. We don’t dress up in Bid Bird costumes, beat the fuck out of some German shepherds and then drop them off at a kid’s party.
It’s reckless and insane.
Army Child Abuse
Women More Likely To Go To Hell
Women Acting Alone
Women In Their 20’s Are The Worst
Related Articles:
August 14th, 2007 at 1:20 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Quite.
But innate cowardice and that very fact are why stealthy or at least indemonstrable (or so presumed) poisoning is women’s favourite approach to murder for insurance fraud.
- Eiffel 65 - Blue (Da Ba Dee)
August 14th, 2007 at 1:22 pm - IP Man-Hash: 369bfee4084ad
I shudder when I think about that 6 times figure of women bringing men into the home to abuse their children. It does happen, all the time. Usually, when a man in a household abuses a child, he is not related to it.
The things some women will do, just to have a maaan in their lives. It’s sickening.
Luka is right when she says some women should not have children, even in a society where women are expected to act like adults. Some just don’t have the instinct.
And this whole post-partum depression excuse is utter bullshit. I have had PPD, a VERY severe case after my son was born. (I had undiagnosed clinical depression at the same time, and the PPD was on top of it - GAH). I can’t say I ever got the urge to hurt him, but I wanted so badly to give him away. It worried me a LOT. But there was always a part of me, a voice in my head, that told me I’d regret it forever if I ever took a step like that. So I went through the motions, and called my doctor.
That’s what I’m saying, though. If you have thoughts of hurting your child, you KNOW it’s not right. It’s not a socially acceptable thing to do. And I know these people know this because they don’t do it in public, only behind closed doors. So you know you’re in trouble, cause you’ve got this crazy stuff going on in your head. What do you do?
You can go ahead and follow through on the thoughts, or you can call someone for help. For chrissake, take a walk and leave the kids for a few minutes! Not the best thing to do, but infinitely better than hurting them! It just kills me everytime one of these psychopaths gets away with injuring or killing a person who relies on them for EVERYTHING, and then getting a big hug and flowers because they had PPD.
Dang. Blog entry coming on.
August 14th, 2007 at 1:54 pm - IP Man-Hash: a13ba81333017
We can thank women for the existence of coroners. And if you’re that concerned, leave your insurance proceeds to your children in trust. Again, men have thought of these things, dangers though they are.
@Kellymac You have a blog? I’ll have to look at it. So little time these days….
-wolfe
August 14th, 2007 at 2:28 pm - IP Man-Hash: d4548428e3f26
chicks are stupid, take my ex girlfriend for example. i moved to 500 miles away to work for three months to earn alot money to buy her a ring(typical man thing to do, take care of busness) and she couldn’t keep her stupid fuckin legs closed for 3 weeks. like she needed a dick pounding as a pacemaker.
also,females are dumb cause they like to dress up with those dumb ass audrey Hepburn giant white glasses, that make every girl decievingly hot. On top of that they can’t keep a best friend for more than four months. guys on the other hand, keep their friends forever.
fat girls on myspace, or whatever lame ass excuse for a website they use to get dates with out of towners on, these girls are taking decievingly hot pictures of themself to catch a man. and if they get him drunk enough they can baby trap his ass. K fed is the only guy to ever do that but with that chicks money why wouldn’t you, he was providing for himself, now he doesnt need shit for a rainy day.
had to vent,
G’s up
August 14th, 2007 at 2:31 pm - IP Man-Hash: d4548428e3f26
one more thing, who is breaking the rules and showing women this website. what the hell guys don’t let them control you with their mind, not like they are smart enough to do it but us guys always read in to things deep cause we are smart and better lovers.
August 14th, 2007 at 2:50 pm - IP Man-Hash: 369bfee4084ad
I do. You’re welcome anytime. Just click my name.
August 14th, 2007 at 2:56 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
She’ll just poison you while your kids are still minors.
- Mecano - Dis-Moi Lune D’argent
August 14th, 2007 at 3:25 pm - IP Man-Hash: c406e944e31e4
KellyMac, why’d you get rid of your picture that you had on your site? Not so trusting that the men wouldn’t give you negative feedback after all, were you? Probably a smart idea, because, trust me, you would have got some very negative feedback. Also, as you’ve removed your picture, does this mean you’ve also done some other editing and removed your bitchy comments about me in your forums, or perhaps, removed any other comments that were actually logical and rational but perhaps because they did not reflect your own narrow-minded mindset, you felt the need to delete them? Surely not, forgive me for questioning one as morally righteous as yourself, clearly you’re above rebuke.
btw, Catherine is a million times hotter than you.
August 14th, 2007 at 3:29 pm - IP Man-Hash: c406e944e31e4
oh and before any comments, yeah, you can all go and fuck yourselves, that is of course, if you haven’t already done so already five times today.
August 14th, 2007 at 3:30 pm - IP Man-Hash: c406e944e31e4
:)
August 14th, 2007 at 3:48 pm - IP Man-Hash: c4d026b819ad4
Desperate.
-Dick
August 14th, 2007 at 3:53 pm - IP Man-Hash: c72d3d7fa1251
Probably pretty likely, Z. At least 50%. Are you saying that absolves the woman?
Considering simply children’s safety, if we have an abuse rate of (say) 10%, and we have 1000 children… 6 will be abused because a woman decides it would be fun for her and her new boytoy to abuse the children.
One will be abused because a man decides the same thing.
Are you adopting the feminist argument that women are morally inferior to men and not really truly human beings capable of independent thought and action? That the men in their lives are forcing them to abuse children?
Now please go consider the Paul Bernardo case.
He was a serial rapist near Toronto Ontario.
Every single victim lived. None were physically harmed apart from the rapes themselves.
A scumbag, definitely.
Then he got married to a woman named Karla Homolka.
Suddenly, they shifted to younger victims and the victims all started dying, including Homolka’s own 14-year-old sister.
The victims often died when alone with dear Karla.
Who was the evil one there? Who was the leader?
Fortunately, we don’t have to guess. We know. Video tape evidence survived, showing Karla was the ring-leader and master of the game.
A grisly, sick game.
She of course got about 7 years in a low-security prison, and Bernardo got live in maximum security.
Because women simply aren’t morally responsible for their actions.
-wolfe.
Thanks for bringing this story to light, Wolfe. I used to live in the area where it happened and, regretably, used to jog by the house where the events occured.
The way in Bernardo’s “activities” changed once Karla came into the picture is one that has never been, to my mind, picked up on by the press, especially in the politically-correct worker’s paradise called Canada.
That the bitch is out, living in Quebec under another name and, reportedly, with her lesbian lover, is a complete travesty.
That the media made it sound like she was a victim in all of this was also disgusting, especially when the video tapes were later found, making clear the extent of her involvement in the murders. I recall the entire affair was spun as an example of male aggression and dominance.
Too bad we can’t fry/hang anyone in Canada. I would like to see both of them go to hell screaming.
August 14th, 2007 at 4:08 pm - IP Man-Hash: a358901ed53cc
Jeeez, Female, a bit touchy? If you didn’t like what KellyMac wrote about you, why not discuss it logically with her rather than list bitchy tripe like this here on MABTW? Her blog does allow comments.
And, did it ever occur to you that maybe she’s removed the picture because she might want to put another one there instead? Or some other graphic? How rude of you to say “Not so trusting that the men wouldn’t give you negative feedback after all, were you? Probably a smart idea, because, trust me, you would have got some very negative feedback.”…
see, this is one of the reasons men get upset with women…nasty comments like this from one woman to another about her looks (instead of the woman with a complaint going to the other woman to DISCUSS and DEBATE points of view INTELLECTUALLY). I’m sure that KellyMac’s world rises and sets on the fact that you think Catherine is hotter than her…she’ll be so upset. Not.
Oh, and I don’t think KellyMac’s EVER said she’s more morally righteous than anyone else and above rebuke.
August 14th, 2007 at 4:18 pm - IP Man-Hash: 369bfee4084ad
Actually, I took it down because I had to cut it out of the original and enlarge it as the original had one of my children in it. Knowing there are nuts like you on the internet, I don’t want people to know what they look like. I didn’t like how the enlargement turned out. Don’t worry, sweetie, I’ll get one up there after my daughter returns from Cali with my camera. As far as feedback, I’ve actually had men say they’d marry me if I weren’t taken, so I’m not all that worried.
As for editing anything out, I have stated many times that I post every comment submitted to me, with the exception of people who ask me not to, or anything illegal or completely unrelated to the subject. For instance, I once had someone send me a comment bad-mouthing a fellow member of the men’s rights movement. It had nothing to do with my blog entry; they just wanted me to post about how evil this person was. I didn’t post that one. In my experience, the only websites that censor comments are the feminist ones. The other night a feminist deleted 3 of my comments in a row, simply because I questioned the assumption that that Airforce woman was telling the truth when she accused those others of rape, even though she couldn’t keep her story straight, and refused to testify because of the stress, but apparently didn’t find it stressful to be in the middle of a media circus. Bitchy comments about you? I don’t remember posting any, but if I did, I wouldn’t dream of taking them down.
As far as Catherine being hotter than me, that’s clearly a matter of opinion. You sound attracted; maybe you should get her phone number.
August 14th, 2007 at 4:26 pm - IP Man-Hash: 84f51b832bd91
A woman’s looks fade.. but her personality grows….hopefully.
:|
August 14th, 2007 at 4:29 pm - IP Man-Hash: 6b5d8a918eeec
Can’t stand dickheads who think they’re righteous.
August 14th, 2007 at 4:42 pm - IP Man-Hash: 04de1e4af36c0
Now repeat after me. Women are six times more likely than men to bring in an outsider to abuse their children.
And how likely is that outsider to be a man?
That was was a dumb thing to say.
-Dick
Actually, it was a simple question. Posed by a single mother who has not brought anyone new into her children’s lives, by choice. The only answer necessary was “about 50%,” but it turned into an interesting discussion of peripheral ideas, until it was derailed temporarily by a little cat fight.
Not all women are feminists, all mothers are not abusive, and all single mothers are not sluts.
Carry on.
August 14th, 2007 at 4:43 pm - IP Man-Hash: 04de1e4af36c0
Because women simply aren’t morally responsible for their actions.
-wolfe.
Morally responsible, or legally responsible? Karma’s a bitch.
August 14th, 2007 at 7:40 pm - IP Man-Hash: 94b3b6aecd2aa
Oh my god, I have to break my very brief self-imposed silence to say that I wish I hadn’t said I’d leave before I read all of zogmama’s posts.
I handed Wolfe the laurel (sonyad was in the running), and here you were, all along, zogmama.
May I offer myself as your acolyte? Or, if you are actually a man posing as a woman, as some here have accused, I must ask - how do you feel about a second marriage, and did you like my picture?
August 14th, 2007 at 7:41 pm - IP Man-Hash: 1d7991e476ee8
That didn’t last very long…