MansVoice said:

Idiots? Turn gay? Wow, thanks for proving everything that Dick has set out to accomplish. You do your gender credit. Bravo.

It’s been my experience that in the last 30 years, women have developed this mindset that they aren’t servants to men. Well, maybe, maybe not, but as a result, when they live with a man, the tend not to do housework because they perceive that as servitude, even when they don’t work and the man brings in all the income.

This isn’t all the time, but from what I’ve seen, it’s the preponderance (and I’m not speaking only from my own former domestic situation, although it’s pretty representative) . I can only conclude that modern women under 50 tend to be fucking lazy bitches. Not to mention parasitic, controlling whores.

In my humble opinion, a man shouldn’t even HAVE a woman living with him. There’s absolutely no benefit. Men generally don’t need the money, the woman almost always start wanting to get pregnant, the sex becomes boring and tapers off to 1/5 of what it used to be, and the don’t do chores. Where’s the benefit in that? What’s left, her pleasant company and conversation? In all likelihood, the biggest reason for her moving in was probably the convenient sex, and after that dries up, there’s nothing left except for her bitching. Men, you have more self-respect than that.

What? I pay all my own bills, thanks. I also don’t nag my boyfriend to clean, nor do I hold it above him when I do. You guys are idiots.

Sam Adams said:

It’s been my experience that in the last 30 years, women have developed this mindset that they aren’t servants to men. Well, maybe, maybe not, but as a result, when they live with a man, the tend not to do housework because they perceive that as servitude, even when they don’t work and the man brings in all the income.

This isn’t all the time, but from what I’ve seen, it’s the preponderance (and I’m not speaking only from my own former domestic situation, although it’s pretty representative) . I can only conclude that modern women under 50 tend to be fucking lazy bitches. Not to mention parasitic, controlling whores.

In my humble opinion, a man shouldn’t even HAVE a woman living with him. There’s absolutely no benefit. Men generally don’t need the money, the woman almost always start wanting to get pregnant, the sex becomes boring and tapers off to 1/5 of what it used to be, and the don’t do chores. Where’s the benefit in that? What’s left, her pleasant company and conversation? In all likelihood, the biggest reason for her moving in was probably the convenient sex, and after that dries up, there’s nothing left except for her bitching. Men, you have more self-respect than that.

All the truth. Men who get married to modern ticks are young morons surging with lust or closet homosexuals looking for a social cover to climb the corporate/political ladder.

This isn’t all the time, but from what I’ve seen, it’s the preponderance (and I’m not speaking only from my own former domestic situation, although it’s pretty representative) . I can only conclude that modern women under 50 tend to be fucking lazy bitches. Not to mention parasitic, controlling whores.

In my humble opinion, a man shouldn’t even HAVE a woman living with him. There’s absolutely no benefit. Men generally don’t need the money, the woman almost always start wanting to get pregnant, the sex becomes boring and tapers off to 1/5 of what it used to be, and the don’t do chores. Where’s the benefit in that? What’s left, her pleasant company and conversation? In all likelihood, the biggest reason for her moving in was probably the convenient sex, and after that dries up, there’s nothing left except for her bitching. Men, you have more self-respect than that.

Apparently one of the feminazy (I forget it’s name) had a daughter. She was determined that the daughter would not be given the option of being a girl, that is, she denied her little girl any dolls or anything that would distinguish her apart from a boy.

She thought that she as a mother was an exemplary example of feminasty right up until she found that the little girl had made a doll out of the rags that she had found around the house.

Feminasty mother found it in her bed one morning.

Feminazy mother decided there and then that male and female are different and tossed the feminazy doctrine and went on to become a writer for men’s rights.

Some women wake up to the lies and deceit. Most do not want to.

Has everyone been lied to ………?

really.

Arielle said:
Anyone with even moderate intelligence that hasn’t been thoroughly brainwashed by feminist dogma should know that there are innate differences between the male and female brains

The number to escape being cowed or brainwashed by said dogma is vanishingly small in the media elites, chattering classes, the academy, and other “good and great” trendsetters of Respectable Opinion in most of the West. Just look at the Summers controversy at Harvard where their president spoke of life choices and, reportedly, “innate differences” possibly explaining why there were far fewer women than men in the hard sciences and engineering. He was excoriated, vilified by a rampaging mob of lunatics bearing torches, pouring through the gates. (Many of them were of course already inside the gates.)

(http://www.slate.com/id/2112570/).

Hence, the value (and rarity) of sites such as this.

Actually - I’ve only heard about that book through other women. Have any of the men here heard of it and if so, what were your thoughts on it?

*(Anyone with even moderate intelligence that hasn’t been thoroughly brainwashed by feminist dogma should know that there are innate differences between the male and female brains as well as male and female behavior and capabilities.)

To add to the mini “language lesson”, it’s also worth noting the verb choices Arielle used, not just “notice” vs. “see”.

If I say “men do not notice”, I imply (suggest) that men CHOOSE not to notice. (This is what she did, if I recall).

If I say “men can not notice”, I imply that men are INCAPABLE of noticing.

Confusingly, if I say “men may not notice”, I imply either that they are NOT PERMITTED to notice or that they PERHAPS will CHOOSE not to notice.

Yes, English is a complex and peculiar language!

As for suggestions of a good book that’s cutting edge and actually useful on male psychology, I’m not really sure for several reasons.

One of the problems is that any research into population genetics and gender biases [and how they impact the brain] is generally viewed as highly politically incorrect. In part this is because much past research in this field has been incredibly stupid and even evil, leading to the sterilization of populations viewed as “defective”. (Margaret Sanger, a woman — no surprise there — lead racist efforts in North America to attempt to prevent whole populations from reproducing.)

This has lead to much of the work in this area being fluffy nonsense (e.g., Deborah Blum’s book, Sex on the Brain: The Biological Differences Between Men and Women. Her book is not garbage, but it is anecdotal and not remotely scientifically rigorous. It also contains many false views of the “superiority” of women.

Possibly a better work — certainly more scientific, but still, somewhat anecdotal and biased towards his speciality (the study of autism) would be Professor Simon Baron-Cohen’s [Cambridge] The Essential Difference: The Truth about the Male and Female Brain. It is worth noting that every male reviewer on Amazon.com gave Prof Baron-Cohen’s work 5 stars, and every female 1. Despite this, his work too says many kind things about women that are perhaps exaggerations.

Some have recommended Steven Rhoads’ Taking Sex Differences Seriously. I don’t know as I’ve not read it.

Dick (and even Arielle) may well know far more about the psychological aspects of gender differences than I and be better equipped to suggest something to your taste and needs. My studies in gender psychology are broad, but not deep.

Hopefully the above was of some help. Nice to meet you as well, Half Soul.

-wolfe.

Why should l pay for something that l dont really want anyway? l do just fine with the standard of cleaning that meets my needs, which is only slightly above average, say at 55%. A woman comes into my life starts cleaning at say 99.99999 anal retentive percent and all of a sudden l am ‘deriving a benefit’ that l must equalise or pay for. Sheesh, female, you think us guys cant see thru your self absorbed campaigns. l am gonna play your silly head game just to illustrate the absudity of your logic… my girl dont do her fair share of the sex work in our relationship. Therefore she should stop whinning about how l want it 3 diffrerent ways, 3 times a day, and pay for escorts.

Or a less absurd example… one of those feral wind screen washers starts cleaning my windscreen at the traffic lights. l say nothing, afterall lm just on my merry way. Then he demands payment for a service he assumed and in fact imposed upon me.

Again, you conveniently glossed over the crux of the matter which is that this whole cleaning is a power trip for women in relationships. Its about your ego. You are endevouring to set the standard, ergo make the rules. Sweet heart, let go of your massive yet fragile ego and relax into life. Its just nowhere as complicated as many women try to make it.

l just thought of another example Female. You are getting all this free analysis and therapy on this site. Yes, l know you dont need it, cant see it, dont care but l am going to UNILATERALLY decide that eventhough you deny it you derive benefit. You dont reciprocate except with duplicitous and tokenistic attempts at ’sweeping the floor’ therefore YOU OWE ME. Why? Because that is what my self absorbed ego demands. In short… because l SAY so.

There, as a female, you should be able to relate to that gamey waffle.