I miss you, man.

As for your question, no.Pakistanis are mostly Muslims(87%.)They converted to Islam long ago during the Islamic invasions of the 11th and 12th centuries.

Indians do well because most of them going there give and pass the GRE, SAT ans whatever other tests you have.They are all good students.

Pakistanis, on the other hand, go to the U.K and elsewhere to just study abroad.Most of them are just mediocre or lower than mediocre students.

Nowadays, many Indian students are going abroad just for the sake of it too.These people seem to be under the impression that just studying abroad means that they’ll get good jobs.

One more question, is the University of Sussex a good one?A boy I know went to study finance there, wasting Rs. 5 million of his father’s money.

For instance, sex itself shows how the woman has a very complicated view of sex even though we all know that she physically has more pleasure in sex than the man. Most women, if not all, count to one thousands before going for sex with a man, but count to only 10 before going for sex with a woman (if she is a lesbian). This is not the case for men.

The reason behind this is because the woman feels that sex is possession and hence she feels shy to have sex with any man. She resorts to taking something in return.

The woman is reluctant even of nudism more than the man. If she feels she is equal to the man, then why she feels shy? Why does she need all the media and laws to encourage her for years to do something?

Even the most notable feminists are shy of sex with men. Sex is just an example that we can easily see in our eyes, which shows that the woman, HERSELF, feels inferiority to the man.

I do not use the terms superiority/inferiority as used by the feminists to denote humiliation. I use these terms just to describe a hierarchy in roles.

First of all, I appreciate that you do not have a stereotypical view of men and women. Neither do I. I don’t say all men are better nor all women are worse! However, there is nature to which we all belong, and nature created us as two sexes with different roles. The basis is whether we want to respect nature, or change our nature.

I do not say men are more important than women. We are both humans, and hence we have the same nature. That is, we are equal in the substance, or nature.

However, men DO have leading roles. I do not say this simply because I have a penis, but because nature created me this way, and created you submissive. Nature created the man pioneer, creative, giver, and ethical; and hence he suits to be the leader. Nature gave the man more grey matters in his brain to be more creative and pioneer. It gave him a larger body to be physically better suited for the hard works.

On the other hand, nature created the woman feminine and submissive. This need not mean you feel submissive to every man, as people are not on the same level. You could have more leading capacities than some men, but STILL you prefer to have a man who leads you and on him you depend.

It is the woman who gets pregnant and breastfeed. Nature created the woman dependent on the man, and suitable for the house work and children.

This is nature, and the question is whether you love or hate your nature.

Dick Masterson is very good at what he does, but these writers are quite heavyweight, backing a lot of their claims with research and statistics. Farrell for example popularised the uncomfortable fact that far more is spent on women’s health than men’s health for instance (despite men paying more taxes).

There is another branch to men’s studies, discussing the difficulties of men’s emotional lives, anger issues and so on. Another American named Bly is a big player in this field, though I have never read him. Bluntly, a lot of ‘emotive’ men’s studies seems to be the work of Anglo-Manginas who want to suck up to women.

Here is a question for you. Is it true that Pakistanis are just low-caste Hindus who ‘converted’ to avoid low status? In Britain, Indians seem much more advanced than Pakistanis. For example, most Indians seem to be Doctors and Lawyers, while Pakistanis are generally dead-beats.

Although you might have fair mentalities, it seems that you want to re-invent the wheels. Women have, for about a century, tried to be responsible and self-dependent, and they absolutely FAILED. Women love to use sex because their are not as pioneers and determined in other areas as men.

For decades, women have been blaming men for their “own” mistakes and failures, and blaming men that he forbid them from working and being self-dependent. So, they entered the work field in an attempt to be like the man. The question is, did they succeed?

An honest answer would be a big NO. They still are dependent on men. They want to be free while dependent on the man. This is because they have less responsibilities and are lazy, and not hard-working.

Their main goal of freedom is SEX, not being self-dependent. Most of the feminists’ articles teach the woman to be dependent on the man and take his money, while she is free.

Women are playing around just because they do not dare to say they FAILED to be self-dependent. What you are doing is just to retry what has been tried and failed.

Have a very happy new year.

Women also like to re-write history as victims. Something I have noted since I got into men’s studies is the way male-specific historical tragedies like the First World War are presented as having befallen ‘a generation’. In fact, they didn’t at all - they befell MEN, exclusively: women were exempt from those negative experiences. Women suffered no casualties in those events, yet this fact is cleverly distorted by using weasel words like ‘generations’, ‘peoples’ and ‘nations’. If they used ‘men’, the correct word for these victims, history would be seen in a truer light.

Again - no mid-wife crisis need be feared; if you’re smart enough to avoid the first one.

menarebetterthanwhimmin.

Once again - whimmin’s failure to understand, acknowledge, or acquiesce to BIOLOGICAL-based differences in the sexes should lead (at least) Western men to never give her a chance at a mid”wife” crisis.
Spoiled bitches.

menarebetterthanwhimmin.

No need to feel sorry for my daughters…I’m not teaching them to be inferior!- that’s not what this is all about. I want them to be responsible for the choices they make in this life and not point to a man when it doesn’t go the way they expected!

If my daughters choose to have unprotected sex and get pregnant - they better ass get a job so they can support the child. Why should it always be a man’s obligation?

They might not be able to change out an engine…but I’m teaching them how to be responsible for their own property…change the oil in your car, maintain your small engines, clean the sediment from your hot water heater.

And for goodness sake, I will tell my girls to never use sex as a weapon. Everyone loses. If a woman is no longer excited by her lover…so be it…tell him and let him go. But never use it as a manipulation tool and make him jump through hoops. Again…everyone loses.

Overall - I just want them to be responsible…not overly dependent or feeling entitled to anything…you make your own bed. It’s really all about respecting each other and not using sex, children, finances or a crying fit to manipulate others.

No matter…I am just committed to making better residents of this world. I’ve been given the challenge of 3 girls…LOL!

Worst thing is that I was oblivious to feminist propaganda (grew up in rural Michigan) and really had no idea how it all affected the way that I grew up…in fact I don’t think it did at all…we were just poor farmers. My dad was blessed with two daughters to work the farm…did he wish to have had a son?…if so, he has never said. He worked us, never the less…thank God! I grew up knowing hard work and how to be self reliant.

Because of my work ethic and self reliance, I have experienced the same as many men in the Friend of the Court…and through the second marriage (did not know about his arreages), quickly found out what happens to income tax refunds or Bush stimulus packages when someone you are married to is behind on child support…even if they went into arreage before you were married. I earned the money, had 3 children of my own to support…and still had to pay his arreage, which accrued before we were married…simply because we were married (I was only making 35,000 a year at the time). All of the women that I paid the arreage to were not working - either stay at home or welfare moms.

I tried to help him legally fight the system…just lost dollars…the government doesn’t care where the money is coming from as long as it is being paid. Obviously it broke up the marriage…the liability of paying someone else’s bills that have nothing to do with you… to the detriment of your ownself and your own children!

I just want to teach my girls to be responsible for themselves. I also hope that they all get to have a chance to experience the love of a man…when it’s authentic and one on one without all of this banter…it is the closest to heaven that one can ever get.

A Gender War? If this happens, then Satan has surely won.

I think our real enemies are materialism and commercialization. What our children are seeing every day as they are being baby sitted by the TV while we are out working our hearts out to keep paying the cell phone and cable bills.

I am serious and this website is a good start point.

As usual what your saying makes complete sense. A mid-wife crisis sounds a lot like years of little glimpses of the reality that the woman did nothing to deserve being treated so well, building up into something normal human beings might call guilt. But since feeling guilty would imply she is not perfect and therefore shatter what’s left of her fragile little soul, and simply showing appreciation is of course out of the question, she has to create a ficitional cutesy sounding syndrome to explain things. And of course being a failure at your own marraige isn’t good enough, you have to convince 800000 other retarded vaginas to fuck up theirs as well to reinforce how enlightened and imporant you are.

By whore logic, starting from the premise that she is not to be blamed for anything, she deduces that the man must be to blame, and therefore she must search for why he is to blame. Which of course takes the form of “my husband is not meeting my emotional needs” aka my husband doesn’t understand the things about me that i just made up so he wouldn’t understand them. And on top of things not having her emotional needs met is a good excuse for her to have on deck for after she blows 8000 guys while married, as to why she isn’t really a whore.