Dick’s Voice Mail #1
Part 1: The Man Beginning
Part 2: The Mantermission
Part 3: The Manclusion
If you’re a man, call 213-985-3425 and leave me a message.
The topic this week is things men are better at than women. Pick one thing men are better than women at, and make your case.
Women, as usual, do not call my voicemail. I don’t want to hear your opinions.
Download Dick’s Voicemail: Episode #1
Related Articles:
Guys lets make them pay for what they have done to our brothers! Everybody start making movies,videos,art, books,vblogs,blogs,websites on Complete MaleSupremacy and take over of all money, power, business,education, industry, electronics! All hail Patriarchy!!! All my brothers rise up! All the men rise up! Let’s all work together to usher in the New Masculine Era!
http://www.savethemales.ca http://www.henrymakow.com http://www.standyourground.com/boyc http://mensrightsmovement.com
http://www.christianparty.net
ALL THE MEN RISE UP! IT’S TIME FOR WAR!!!
I am shutting this site down.
Lol, I’ll write a draft for MY voicemail!
“Dick Masterson — yeah, hey. Uhm… Well, I called to ask you to stop fucking my brother. See, we’re afraid they’ll kick him out of the Navy. Thanks.”
All the crank callers had nothing worthwhile to say.
Even the man – and that’s really disappointing.
I imagine he was under female influence. Poor sod.
emo girls are the hottest imo but any girl on webcam is just sexy
i love how fucking dumb sluts call up people like dick or tom leykis and talk about their scum the spat out of their hairy cunts. also dick you have a sexy voice, too bad your face isn’t though…
Who gives a shit what his face looks like, bro. Forget the face, forget the d(D)ick. Brain is the key. If you hold back, bitches will be jumping on you. There is only one thing every dick should do – mind his own fucking business. Everything else will come to ya.
I just love to hear these women calling in raving, screaming, cursing Dick and the rest of us manly men on this site, its sweet entertainment
no what is sweet entertainment is chris’s vocabulary and seeing how many times he will say ‘cute try though’ or call some a girl a lesbian, whore or bitch or when hes being really clever a cunt.
he’ such an original thinker that chrissy poo
bitches have no purpose to live in this world
It’s a man world , and if you don’t comply you get exterminated.
Men are much better than women!!!
What the fuck are you talking about?
i wouldnt worry about her, as a woman shes never contributed anything to society, such as a quote. Clearly she doesn’t understand the concept of originality and cleary cannot comprehend that not everything someone says is “quoted” from a movie
Well, coming from a primitive, caste-divided shit-hole as you do, you probably cannot conceive of a world-view without it.
“Gandhi was racist” – Idiot.
“MESS WITH THE BEST, DIE LIKE THE REST” You’ve got to be fucking joking me. You’re quoting a film like “Hackers” to prove what a manly man you are?? Man, that’s HYSTERICAL!
I’m gonna be thinking of computer geeks in a whole other light now.
“I’m so cool; I pull random, B-rated film lines out of my ass to show what a bad ass I am!”
Spoken like a true humanist who believes in equality of all (except fatties, hahhahahahahahah).
“A bookstore is like a daycare for women”
LMFAO just great
Absolutely fascinating, isn’t it? They never mentioned his racism in that pompous, over-rated movie. Obviously, our resident snowflake is not nearly as informed as she thinks she is. Mess with the best, die like the rest.
“There,” said the Mayor: “That’s that.”
Wow…thanks Muzalon, I never thought to look into ghandi at all.
Who cares?
It might interest you to find that your great humanitarian ‘leader’ Ghandi was actually a racist who despised black people:
http://www.trinicenter.com/oops/gandhi2.html
Yup, that boy was really ringing those changes! Except when dealing with blacks or Untouchables… Is your latest assignment in finger-painting, by any chance?
Oh, I’m feeling so ’shut down’ by your stale secular humanism…
I assume you are Australian. Now, Miss Humanist, not to mention Miss Save the Whale anti-racist, when did have sex with an aboriginal male?
Think carefully now…
Hahaha indeed I am friends (a snowflake that is, beautiful and unique) what’s hilarious is that nothing you say actually refutes anything I have said, everything I stated is factual to a large extent and your retaliation is merely an alternate opinion. Really all that you write is simply a mish mash of what you consider to be intellectual language, you grab hold of anything contrary to my opinion throw in some big boy words and hope that no one notices. If you read (I’m unsure of your abilities in this area) my response, you may have noticed I am a humanist which means (again) I believe in equality of all. This means that quite obviously I am not a racist, nor am I a sexist (like yourself). Also i would like to point out that outside your strange little mind the world is not “lead” by military-industrial oligarchy. These are dictating forces. Those who lead are people such as Ghandi, Martin Luther King, Rose Scott all of the cliched revolutionary leaders who actually made an improvement to this sad sad world. Also doing something useful with my life like helping to run a foundation for the aid of indigenous Australians? Donating and helping to build refuges for the homeless? or moving to Peru to build shower blocks in villages? My friend what useful things have you done with your life? Abused women? Created flowery dissertations of the evils of half of the worlds population? Watched some porn? Played some video games?
Though finally and because I need to go and finish my assignments I would like to tell you a little truth I am 17 years old. hahahahahahhaahahhahaha and all of you were all “oh no kill the big feminist” haha sorry it is funny though that you were threatened by a 17 year old girl. Also sad (for you) that you were shut down by the same 17 year old girl aahaha. As for naivety the fact that you believed that I was a psychologist is testament to the fact that I am am not in any way – naive. My life experience I’m almost definite would outweigh yours a million fold. haha so anyway good luck with your sad sad lives and I will continue on with my promising and prosperous life here in reality. P.s are you overweight? it’s usually the over weight people who hate others unreasonably, I find in all my psychological knowledge that fatties are the ones with a lot of emotions hahahahahaha Good day to you all! much love!
It’s a rough job entertaining the world all the time, good thing we have men to do it
LOL, that was so funny L, she is … indeed.
I mean, she was so refined, when she had speculated about “the rape� and then again “the rape in a jail�. She must be so scared that someone would probably still that armchair from her;)
“another one bites the dust�
Charlotte:
You are a unique and special snowflake aren’t you? Enjoying your armchair psychology? Stop wasting your time, go do something useful with your life.
Actually, dimwit, people who ‘lead us’ – I mean, the military-industrial oligarchy, not the marginalised intelligentsia – owe their position to birth class. And read Sutherland for an expose for their ‘high moral standards’. You are not self-actualised or individuated in the Jungian sense: you are simply naive. You just assume that white, upper middle class values are immutable, refusing to acknowledge the diversity of lifestyles and opinions in the Post-modern era. Every point you made could be refuted without effort, and I will return to them in due course.
P.S. You’re a racist, aren’t you?
What is it with manholes and public masturbation?
Bitches fall down in manholes, opens mouth to catch cum from public masterbators
I loved that you were -to put it plainly “shut down” by every other comment I made and were forced to resort to only evading threat. Really in doing that you were merely trying to reassure yourself that you wouldn’t get in trouble with the big people. I know more about you than you do. Also no I am not a feminist, I am a humanist. If you’re unsure what that means it’s a person who believe in equal rights for all humans. Though in your case I’ll make an exception. I would like to complete the most basic exercize known to criminal psychology. I would like you to put yourself in the position of a woman, then go from there. Then think about the fact that it was only by a 50 per cent chance that you were born a man. Now think about how many people hate you, and how you will never have love with another person, because you have alienated an entire half of the population due to mere principle. One that you concocted due to a bad childhood or years of abuse. Unless of course you are homosexual, which is fine too, though you do have many many problems to work through.
To the person “Son of the Suns” who commented my comment. You just let me know when this apocalypse comes then oh Zeus. Also please do not pledge you sexual desires to me I find them repulsive. Though as I said I am a humanist and have pledged to help all that I can, so in helping you I would like you to look back and forgive women for rejecting you, they too are only human. Then move forward with your life, find yourself in learning that the opposite half of the populace is your equal and that the fact that you feel dominated by them is not something that you should fear. Finally no I do not believe power is a toy, it is something that is attained through achievement. In the more basic, less advanced ages that was achieved by brute force, in the 21st century we know more. We are more advanced in our thinking. We value those who have the ability to helps us move forwards, scientists, engineers etc. We value those who are able to lead without letting power go to their head, and the leaders that are valued above all are those who maintain high moral standards, who can accept and equal and who can be advised on matters that he/she does not understand in their fullest. These are the people who lead us, the advanced few, rather than you (sorry about the insult though it is necessary as it is true) the less advanced more backward people. Also I do not believe in an afterlife, heaven or hell I do not believe in God or any other form of deity. I am not Buddhist. I am myself with my own beliefs and a person who is not threatened by something that does not exist. I am content because I know myself and have reached self actualization. Are you content with yourself? Or are you unhappy and alone, abusive and rejected? Best of luck.
We’ll see how powerful the effiminate little pen is against the force of arms united by 3 generations of cuckolding, emasculation, and slavery.
Your pathetic little fantasm order is coming to an end.
If you don’t submit then you and the Sky Godder scum can cry in the next life. This one calls on the mighty to rule over it and the timid scum who think power is a toy instead of a calling.
The great white feminist in the sky speaks! By the way, I hope you report all the homophobia and racism by female posters on these pages to the Police, too (‘gook whores’ was the phrase most commonly used): both quite serious offences, these days, inciting homophobia and racism.
I find it hilarious that you have deluded yourself to the point of thinking that males still have dominance in this world. Here’s some news buddy, if you live in the western world you dominate with the pen, not the sword and seeing as you clearly never went to school you fail to meet the modern worlds standards, you may as well either move to a third world country (and hopefully starve) or resign yourself to the fact that you are never going to get anywhere in life, you simply are a sad little man who’s mother starved him of affection and therefore blames all women for it subconsciously. You in a couple of years will be that fool who killed a prostitute and is now locked in jail being raped by hundreds of other men because even in the lower end of the sex spectrum, you are at the bottom of the barrel. It is extremely unfortunate that you exist, though I do believe you exist for some minute purpose which was to annoy the female sex and make them stronger in their fight against people like you. Also, you seem to have come up with all sorts of theories about “male dominance” when really all male dominance ever was was brute force, so you can sit there coming up with your theories whilst intelligent beings like myself a renowned psychiatrist with several degrees, looks down on little people like you and analyzes how your minuscule brain works and understand more and more about why you are so deluded. Meanwhile, i have decided to report this website to the police. Good luck with your life.
You made it clear for men to call only, so why is it women keep calling? …oh wait, thats right.
For example I think that demanding respect is a total miss understanding and demanding respect is what women do. When earned, respect is given. And it’s given when a person does something significant to a group in which there are both; men/ man and women/woman.
Unfortunately pseudo-feminism benefits only women in a way that they don’t have to earn anything but are entitled to have anything. That’s why women won’t ever earn men respect, but also won’t ever feel the self worth. And the more they do it more men will hate them, and disrespect them.
Women would learn a lot form you. It’s a pity, that your observations and views can not be heard and learned by other women.
I bet being competent and having a feeling of competence (at least in a certain area) is a great feeling you feel. This is what we men want form women. This actually is all we men want form women. I was not born with competence, no one was and in the beginning is seems so tough. But when you get there you feel free. And this is where the freedom comes form. Not form demanding it, not form creating more nonsense privileges. It’s the feeling a human feels, when achieves competence.
That is why I am against the Social Matrix, which says; Hey women you need more rights, so you’ll feel better.
I teach women how to be competent, mostly in personal life. This is what they are interested in most anyway and also it’s true that more a person is competent=satisfied in their personal life, more she becomes competent in other areas. But it doesn’t work vice-versa. That is where women’s movement failed. And what pseudo-feminists are doing, they teach women to be more and more incompetent with men, however claiming, that what they teach is the competence. What a sneaky evil it is. It only creates more and more frustrated women. Why is that?
Well, teaching a women how to be competent with men is easy. After that a woman is freed and she doesn’t need any advice any longer because she becomes competent. And this is the problem right there, she is no longer a customer. But if a woman never is supposed to achieve the competence, but she thinks she is in the process of becoming “more and more competent and aware� she still is a customer.
And that’s how it goes on and on and women are being screwed all this time, no longer by men “congratulations�, but now by The Social Matrix. They lose their femininity and over time turn into monsters, and they hate it. But they can’t see The Social Matrix, so therefore the only logical choice is to hate men or themselves or both.
@ Studioline – In answer to your question, (without getting too much in detail about my life on the internet), up until recently I spent about 13 years working in a male dominated field that had very few women in it. So, in that sense, I suppose I would have been considered an active feminist. I learned a lot during that time, either through personal experience, or from observation of others, such as:
- You don’t get respect by demanding it. Respect only comes through hard work, and doing your job well. Be professional at all times, and be a lady (not girly, there’s a difference).
- There’s nothing worse than trying to be “one of the guys,” ie chewing tobacco, cursing, coarse jokes, etc.
- If you go into a male dominated field, don’t whine about how hard it is. If you can’t cut it, find something that is more suited to your abilities.
- Don’t seek/ accept special treatment because of your gender.
I’m not a political activist. Most times, I don’t even like being in a crowd of people, so I’m not very well suited to that sort of lifestyle. I do enjoy taking the opportunity now and then for online discussions, and as a matter of personal philosophy I try to conduct myself in anonymity just as I would in person.
As far as women today, I don’t know. There is a counter-movement going on towards balance, going against the radical-feminists, but they will always be downplayed or ignored in the media. Who knows? No society is ever static, it’s in our basic human nature.
Gold.
Add Ireland too. Can’t forget about Ireland.
Lynn
Im so excited. I was not sure that you are a woman. I alwas wanted to meet a woman who is a true feminist and I never did. It seemed to me that true feninists do not have any voice in your country. I like your views on the issues. If all women listen to you, it wolud be a hugde steap forward. Gee I wish more women had wievs like this. I also respect you, that you still belive both in men and women, despite the abuse you seem to take form both sides. Also, I admire that you stand behind your beliefs, despite that, and you are above the hate, as it seems to me. I bet you have a tendency to piss people off, though;))) And that’s a separate topic.
It also seems to me that you are some kind of an active feminist or maybe you got already a little bit tired of explaining to women, and them not listening to you, so for this reason you are not so active, I dont know, but Im interested, about it.
I am very interested in hearing form you about, Why women do not listen to you? What’s going on there?
Not a little like ‘elected’ politicians, academics, or anyone else… including you. No one changes anything.
Just look at how rock stars changed ‘Africa’ and halted global warming…
You forgot the part about the cheeseburgers and fries.
@NMH – I believe in equality for both men and women, and the virtue of common sense. I believe that radical feminism is tearing apart our culture by conditioning young women to believe that all men are evil, and that their rights take precedence over those of men. I believe that if two people go in for a job interview, the most qualified individual should get the job regardless of gender or skin color. I believe that when children are involved, divorce should only be an action of last resort, and to that end: I believe that alimony is ridiculous, especially when the ex-spouse is perfectly capable of providing for themselves. I believe that money from an ex-spouse should only go to provide for child support, and to that end, custody should go to whichever parent will best provide the best home for them, emotionally and physically. I believe in personal responsibility and accountability. That pretty much touches on the points most people are concerned about here.
Oh, one more. I believe that CS has been lonely here for the last week or so, it’s good to see he’s got his support group back.
Lynn is probably the smartest female here and she has no other talent than wordsmything and propagandizing that males with an IQ of 90 could do if they had time between their menial jobs to pay her tax subsidized life.
All arrogant western females from the United States, Australia, New Zealand, the United Kingdom, and especially Canada (where 99.99% of all the women in that country are sick, retarded, narcissistic pieces of money-obsessed garbage) deserve to be dragged out of their houses and shot at point blank range. You go ahead and tell ‘em like it is, mantastic.
Lynn makes, I think, extremely well-thought out remarks and I’m pretty sure shes against radical feminism. She may be against equity-feminism as well.
Jeezus “Lynn” you are so fucking full of your self you ignorant cunt, why do you do all of us a favor and play in rush hour traffic. You pretend to be “intellectual / intelligent” but all you are is a pompus, narcissisitc, pretentious, presumptious, egocentric inflated ego piece of shit loser who has a grip on words…and nothing else, mainly reality. You’re the kind of arrogant fucking cunt men would love to punch in the fucking face. I hope you get a case of the itchines and scratch yourself to death you useless fucking cunt. You’re female, that means you’re NOTHING just like your useless fucking opinions. Ignorant stupid cunt, fuck off and die.
Republicans and Socialists are only allies in the same cause but for vastly different reasons.
Republicans are for feminism because they can’t loose 50% of their tax base for their foreign resource wars. They all want to be famous and rich and be known with men like Caesar and Alexander. But they are short term minded primates incapable of long view.
Socialists care less about war and tax revenue than they do about castrating masculine societies.. they’ve started in the West and they know if they can cuckold the sons of Muhammed they can accomplish anything. They are like fish out of water in anything as masculine as war.. but at the same time they are very duplicitious and cunning and are using the Republican’s pride for their own long term goals of a global bastard state.
The first charismatic male who mixes socialist ideologies like energy nationalization and has environmentalist autistics shot en masse for their protests of domestic energy dominance with traditionally rightwing concepts like state-mandated patriarchy and unlimited war on aggressor nations will give himself a crown.
Anon
First of all accept my appologies if i have defended you
I know for sure you are a great men. but understand, that it the other post I was just talking to No manhole it was actually about his idea of the world as a whole. never mind.
But you know sometines when you exchange ideas like this way, a missunderstaning can take place.
I totally agree with you that going to irak with feminsm is like sentencing more american soldiers, that’s why I’ m suprised that people who are in charge of your international policy don’t take care first about this sexes war issue, and then after that go teach others how to live.
I know that between women feminists there are ones, who are against what is going on now, but their voice doesn’t count any longer, becasue the is no feminism today. There is only pseudo – feminism.
This somethig is f… up your county form the insight and someone has to do something about it. This is in my opinon the no1 issue for all of you there, because resolving this only issue, would resolve most of your problems.
I wanted to make it short, see you, this issues will come back, let’s start again form the beginig.
Anon
First of all accept my appologies if i have defended you
I know for sure you are a great men. but understand, that it the other post I was just talking to No manhole.
But you know sometines when you exchange ideas like this, a missunderstaning can take place.
I totally agree with you that going to irak with feminsm is like sentencing more american soldiers, that’w why i m suprised that people who are in charge of this international policy, do’t take care first about this sexes war issue, and then go teach others how to live.
“there are zillion of conservative/Republican women in the USA who would never vote for commie-scum, or even Hilary.”
Yea guess what, Republicans are Communists too with promotion of feminism very high on the agenda. Why do you think they are spending billions in Iraq? One of the primary reasons is to spread feminist culture and law.
“being a liberal can be consistent with a profound dislike for radical feminism.”
Liberal in the sense of Socialist/Leftist? Sorry I really can’t see that working out. In nearly all Socialist parties today (Democrats, Labour Parties, etc.), feminist thinking and policy totally rules the roost.
“I’m all for equality of the sexes, but I don’t think women should be promoted in society over men.”
This is what happens when modern Socialist parties take power – they promote women over men. Consistently. Be it Clinton in the USA or Zappetero in Spain. I’m so sorry to disillusion you.
“I’m all for equality of the sexes” … These are the exact phrases word for word that denote feminists, feminist-appeasers or manginas.
“Don’t get angry with Anon, he is just not on your level or rather he was not thinking. He just needs to understand, with time he will.”
“I was not thinking”?? Sorry let’s get real here, “studioline”. The link between Marxism (i.e. Socialism) and Feminism is very clear, and always have been. Feminists down through the decades have commented on this connection, and Marx, Engels and the other Communist crew were among the first to campaign for “women’s rights” and feminism in a mainstream political manner. One feminist commentator when asked what would a post feminist society look like said: A Socialist State with children raised by communities. (I.e. dismantlement of nuclear family complete.)
“There are some real feminists men and women, but not to many listen to them, they just want to kill each other.”
How are you so sure that wasn’t the stated aim of Feminism since the Founding Documents of the 1960s and 1970s?! I don’t know where you got this ABSOLUTELY ridiculous notion, that feminism means co-operation between the sexes, out of.
CS placed a hyphen between Yankee and English, so its a composite race, at least in his mind. Best Wishes.
What are you going to do about it? And how the fuck am I a Yankee-English Anglo-fuck?! That doesn’t even make sense you moron. And for your information, if I apparently have a “B.A in Basket Weaving”, then that’s a lot more than you’ll ever have.
Get the fuck off the site, you overweight Yankee-English Anglo-fuck with a B.A. in basket weaving. I hope you accidentally piss your boyfriend off and he ends up having to bust out all of your teeth with his bare fists. To tell you the truth, every single frigid Anglo-fuck whore living in the female-dominated nations of Canada, Great Britain, the United States, Australia, and New Zealand deserves to have her neck snapped and her eyes gouged out with a pair of tongs.
Geeza says:
Its called development sweets. No wonder women are paxil and prozac guzzling emo wrecks. They’re underdeveloped since incubation.
Heheh, yeahh.
To be honest, I couldn’t possibly give a flying shit about what you say.
You’re just some nobody who worships sexism, and thinks he’s so clever because he was born with a penis, to be honest, I’d say that’s over developed mate. That’s not development anymore, that’s something else!
I’m surprised that some of these people like to call themselves doctors, it’s hilarious, yet very sad at the same time. If that’s what most men in America are coming to, then god damn it I’ve never been so proud to be British, where all male and female are considered equals.
Oh, and Dick, if that’s really your name, it’s extremely appropriate, and would sound better ending in head.
So you’re here arguing against someone who will last 15 minutes and has a .0001% chance of changing a thing about anyone or anything and whos site is visited by men who already have a preemptive hatred of women?
More like epic stupidity.
You could have saved so much time an energy and simply typed ‘I may make a complete fool of myself, but I can sound very intellectual while doing so’.
Man are better than women because women never challenge the Social Matrix that’s why they can never be heroes. The world is always changing for the better, and a change is only possible, because men challenge the Social Matrix.
According to you Neo was an asshole becasue he had glasses.
Well meybe that helped him to focus when he faced mad mass of agent Smiths.
Try to challange the Social Matrix and you will see for yourself.
Epic WIN
I seriously give you credit for providing a bastion for the typical American male nobody to feel justified in their preemptive hatred towards women. As total slaves to their simple urges, they feel secure and justified by a website glorifying chauvinistic views conjured to mask their inevitable feelings of rejection, mediocrity, and utter uselessness. That you make a working business (and apparently a lucrative profit) off of this works equally well to contradict your views on women, as well as uphold the delusion many typical men desperately need to believe in a time when they’re faced with due inferiority.
I’d be interested in your website showcasing works of progression for all mankind by both yourself and your members. Exceptional math skills, scientific breakthroughs, inventions, cosmic theories, published works, degrees, Championship awards, and technological advancements brought to fruition from anyone on this site. At least a Dean’s List certificate or properly-spelled resume would suffice – something to place where your mouth is, so to speak, would go a long way in convincing the world of your legitimacy, and would hopefully appear in lieu of incessant complaining and nagging, so like many women, ironically…
I’m also sure you’ve had this asked to you a thousand times, but why the sunglasses? You seem cocksure enough to present your views on national television; glasses are usually reserved for indoor use by one afraid, in some way, to reveal themselves, Dick. They’d go real well with a trip to Afghanistan or Iran. Have you ever thought of moving to what appears to be your promised land? You may be alot happier there. Either way, although you have about a .0001% chance of changing a thing about anyone or anything, at least you’re smart enough to keep most people from easily recognizing you until your 15 minutes is up.
Funny you say should that, Tommaso. Strictly speaking, Josef Mengele was a gifted physician, well known for his intelligence and refinement.
I have to disagree with u on that one women are only good at providing the world with life, not pleasure if that is what u were meaning, Dick u are gods right ball.
The world would be a much better place to live in if all women were forced to wear burkahs and thrust back into the kitchen where they belong. Enough said.
Women are worthless fucking cock sockets.
As for the woman that says “we have a couple of women, you know just saying what’s on their mind”, you know that one that also says “we are worthy” or “this is a woman leaving a message”.
I think this dumb broad needs to get her bits and bolts checked. Notice how she says “we are worthy”, well when someone is found to be “worthy” that word refers to an old one from back in the day which relates to one being a DISCIPLE or a follower of a MASTER which is us men. Plain and simple she made herself look like a complete dumb ass.
Also the words “this is a woman leaving a message”…can she possibly crawl any farther into a dark endless pit of self confusing loathing. Like seriously…she clearly sounds like a fat, ugly and disgusting broad.
And when she said “this is a woman leaving a message” I almost fell off the end of my couch and onto the floor bursting with laughter and confusion…but that confusion was cleared up only seconds after it occured….why? Because I answered my own question which was “why did she say this is a women leaving a message”. My answer to myself was “well she is probably a confused and/or stupid individual…” which is normal for women…but seriously unless she was confused about her own sexuality she really did not need to say that part…she could of just hung up the phone.
Anyway cheers to Dick and his great success. As for you whores, chicks, obese fat ass twinkie loving hefers…you can all go fuck yourselves because….
********MenAreBetterThenWomen.com**********
( MABTW.com ) For ALL you women who are simple minded.
Guys
Talking about which brain is better is the same as talking about what is better coke or pepsi, or what is better PC or MAC.
It leads nowhere, besides only arguing.
The differnence comes from social martix. I like the term Matrix because it comes form the movie Matrix, which you can look at as stupid sci-fo movie, or you can look at the message it carries.
The purpose of our brain is not to argue, but to see the Matrix, and tell people what it is about this time, and how this pathology destoys us. Men and woman are now ready to kill each other, they hate each other instead of love each other. Sure in the begining this whole pathology was let’s say usefull, cos people were buying more things they didn’t need. But now your county USA is colapsing form the inside, and no one has a good idea what the f… to do about it. Either you poepole are going to do something about it or you are going to kill each other. So right now at its stage the present Matrix is no good for anybody.
Im just suprised that your goverment, that grew some extra power lately doesn’t have ideas basicly what to do about it.
I know but I don’t have any power, so I just can stay suprised:)
Right now you don’t need more preassure, You need more hapiness, to be motivated to live. You need to resolve the issue between man and women. The issues are because for last decades only women were allowed to speak and at some point the idea that was once started, by people like JFK, changed into a pseudo idea into a social Matrix a pathology and now it needs to be taken care of, even more than oli somewhere.
Mr. Richard Lynn is a modern Galileo spreading the truth of female intellectual inferiority to the world. He is the scientific champion we so earnestly need to fearlessly challenge the current stranglehold the liberal and Marxist-influenced establishment has on socio-political discourse. Only ignorant people, the majority of whom consist of the usual clique of mentally inferior, lesser evolved female brains, attack his character through the fallacy of ad hominem and vile calumny; if those who choose to criticize wish to prove themselves worthy opponents, they should stick to directly addressing the actual substance of his arguments for reasons of pure logic alone. After all, the great physicist, William Shockley Ph.D., often made foolish remarks about the science of eugenics, but this in no way detracts from his reputation as inventor of the solid-state transister and Father of the Information Age. In other words, any successful criticism of Lynn should be based on an analysis of those academic papers that closely pertain to his appropriate speciality (preferably in the one he was originally trained in) rather than the occasional off-hand remark, made in a moment of thoughtless absentmindedness, that is often played up by the media.
Generally speaking, I find it rather telling upon the character of the individual who they draw upon for inspiration. Especially as they espouse one side of the nature of their inspiration, but with hold from general scrutiny the entirety of the picture.
Racism is an easy trump card to throw out. It instantly puts the opponent on the defensive, and as an emotionally charged issue, quickly reduces the level of critical thinking in the audience at large. Interesting that you have used this tactic on your opponents, and yet it is so prevalent in the text that you admire.
Otherwise, I find debating the issue of intelligence with you about as satisfying as discussing astronomy with Tommaso Caccini.
Interesting fellow, Richard Lynn:
“What is called for here is not genocide, the killing off of the populations of incompetent cultures. But we do need to think realistically in terms of “phasing out” of such peoples. If the world is to evolve more better humans, then obviously someone has to make way for them. … To think otherwise is mere sentimentality.”
“Who can doubt that the Caucasoids and the Mongoloids are the only two races that have made any significant contributions to civilization?” (New Republic, 10/31/94)”
It is a well-established scientific fact, known since the time of the Greek philosopher Aristotle, that the male brain is substantially bigger than the female and that, because of this, men are intellectually superior to women. In fact, the female level of intelligence is so astonishingly low that many within the academic community are prepared to cease classifying women as members of Homo sapiens and see them as a species of highly evolved primate.
@ NMH – I think that we’ve at least got a good start on public awareness (on the food issue), esp. when you consider the fact that schools have been revamping their menus and removing soda and candy machines.
The whole social reform issue has always been a tricky one. I can’t say that I disagree about the need for certain forms of government assistance, in a variety of cases. What I do disagree with is that in many cases, these forms of government assistance are “open ended,” with little or no incentive to improve beyond the immediate situation.
Take for example welfare and single mothers, which I use here since it is a popular enough topic on this site. The way it is designed, it is actually more “beneficial,” monetarily, for the father to be absent from the picture, because no money would be received if there were a breadwinner in the house. Albeit with good intentions, we have created a situation which has resulted in a dramatic rise in the number of fatherless families. This is causing irreperable harm to a number of children who grow up without a father, and believeing that there is little if any importance to a stable, two parent home. In addition, in the more extreme cases, children are valued not as the result of a two people coming together in a loving, monogamous relationship, but as a monetary asset to bring in more government dollars.
It seems to me also that the stigma of being dependant on others (ie government dollars) has been gradually eroding away, which also falls in line with the need for immediate gratification and free spending in our society.
I hate that people are no longer held responsible for the choices that they make. We justify the worst crimes by stating that the individual who committed the crime had a bad childhood, or had a hard time in life, and therefore is more deserving of our sympathy than our censure.
O Lord, deliver me from these selfish, materialistic Yankee whores who threaten to indoctrinate the world with the twin evils of a feminism and Marxism gone mad.
The basic fact that you seem to ignore, Commander, is the reality of variability of intelligence in populations. As you and I both calculated, a male with the average IQ of approximately 105 will have 45% of the population of women smarter than him. Hence, it is reasonable to conclude that male and female intelligence, in a population of the same race, is about the same. For some reason, you keep ignoring this reality, which strongly suggests that you cannot analyze data without a personal bias and therefore cannot be trusted for an objective description of the available scientific information. Furthermore, posters have proven that YOU have falsified the interpretation of scientific results in earlier posts. Your done, Commander.
MALES HAVE GREATER GENERAL INTELLIGENCE THAN FEMALES
Steve Blinkhorn is a controversial psychometric researcher and gender scholar who has been repeatedly implicated in many attempts to deliberately falsify evidence. He is widely known for maintaining a strong ideological kinship with gender feminism and the liberal Keynesian economics of the social welfare state. Blinkhorn is also a staunch advocate of the extreme social constructionism propagated by the late Harvard palaeontologist S.J. Gould, another fellow socialist academic suffering from a severe bout of left-wing infantile psychosis. It has been fully established by much of the scientific community at large that much of his research has been thoroughly discredited by all leading proponents of hereditarianism and evolutionary biology. Many of the studies that have been produced by Blinkhorn have actually been derided by many scholars as both methodologically unsound and characterized by frequent distortions of whatever available scientific evidence is on hand. To illustrate, it was widely believed by a number of British psychologists, as determined by the mechanical technique of establishing coefficients of co-variation by means of electromagneto-encephalography (EM-EEG), that brain electrical activity could be reliably associated with psychometric differences in measured intelligence; the mathematical determination of “string length�, interpreted as average evoked potential, is expressed in terms of evoked potential component amplitude, and often under the parameters of such brain wave features as latency, contour length, variability, and zero-crossings. The major premise of those investigations involved in gathering together such empirical observations is based on the null hypothesis that people of high intelligence would have more reliable brain electrical responses to stimuli generated by the outer environment. Many within the academic community argued that the string length of the average brain electrical potential demonstrated an unmistakably positive correlation with both reaction time and differential abilities in mental capacity.
In his desperation to provide documentary evidence of a positive correlation between brain evoked potential and psychometric intelligence, Blinkhorn, as well as fellow left-wing colleague D.E. Hendrickson manufactured evidence for a 1982 study which purportedly demonstrated that such an association was an objectively quantifiable phenomenon. Most of the evidence gathered by Blinkhorn and Hendrickson was deliberately falsified, with much of the data being wilfully invented in order to further bolster claims of a direct causal relationship between average brain-evoked potentials and mental ability. The English psychologist of German extraction, Hans Eysenck, who is also celebrated as the great radical libertarian defender of hereditarianism, along with colleague P.T. Barrett, subjected much of the documentary evidence collected by Blinkhorn and Hendrickson to rigorous scientific scrutiny in two studies produced in 1992 and 1994 respectively. They failed to replicate any of Blinkhorn’s findings on string length measure of individual differences in average evoked potentials. In numerous instances, Eysenck and Barrett had actually managed to reverse the same association that had previously been established by Blinkhorn and co. Therefore, I submit that Blinkhorn is an academic charlatan; he is a pseudo-intellectual fraud who should, under no circumstances, be trusted by anyone seeking a rigorously scientific explanation of observed gender-based differences in human intelligence.
Blinkhorn’s rather quite inane and laughable criticisms of the research of Lynn and Irwing (2004, 2005) are easily disposed of once all of the dust has settled. The most powerful evidence in favour of the meta-analysis produced by Lynn and Irwing (2004) is the fact that it is based on 57 representative general population samples that consist of a total of 80,928 participants. Much of the available evidence for greater male mental ability in childhood clearly reveals that there is a marginal male intellectual superiority up until the onset of early adolescence. When the child reaches the fifteenth year of his physical development, his level of general intelligence increases by 5-10 IQ points; both female intellectual development and cranial capacity remains roughly static throughout the period of her adolescence beginning with the onset of her first menarche. In full confirmation of this, a study was conducted by M. Y. Quereshi and Rainer Seitz (1993) on the basis of those raw scores obtained through the administration of a comprehensive battery of psychometric tests (WPPSI, WISC-R, and the WPPSI-R) to children under the age of 6 years. On all three tests, it was shown that pre-pubescent males actually scored considerably higher than the average female. Through this avenue of psychometric testing, it was clearly demonstrated that males are significantly more intelligent than females (p < 0.05). Moreover, the fact of substantial gender-based differences in psychometric intelligence on the WISC-R in favour of male intellectual dominance was also further reinforced by the researchers Lynn, Raine, Venables, Mednick, and Irwing (2005). Boys obtained a significantly higher full scale IQ by 5.8 IQ points; in addition, boys also obtained a higher performance IQ by 6.5 points and a higher mean verbal IQ by 1.0 IQ points. Furthermore, it was mathematically calculated through a rigorous methodological analysis based on a series of complex statistical computations that boys possess a significant advantage on measures of Spearman’s operationalization of fluid intelligence, otherwise known as “g�. According to the fundamental statistical methodology of principal component analysis, it was determined that boys had an advantage over girls on Spearman’s g by 6.15 IQ points. The raw test scores underlying this figure are finally converted into point-biserial correlations. The resulting numbers are then entered within the full matrix of subtest correlations where these are subjected to further factor analysis. By subsequently determining the sex loading on g one finally ends up with a positive correlation between sex and g of .224, the equivalent of 6.9 IQ points. It is this evidence which fully establishes the developmental aspect of Lynn and Irwing’s theory of female intellectual inferiority, namely that a marginal sex difference in mental capacity exists giving males the advantage until the 14th year. At the age of 15, a significant cognitive difference between males and females is manifested much more visibly; the statistical mean of male intelligence gradually increases to its adult value of anywhere between 5-10 IQ points in favour of male intellectual superiority.
Moreover, there are further lines of converging evidence from four adult samples of gender-based differences in intelligence (n = 11,896) which confirm that men are intellectually superior to women by about as much as 10 IQ points or two-thirds of one standard deviation. The researchers Colom, Juan-Espinosa, Abad, and Garcia, on the Spanish standardization of the WAIS-III, found considerable sexual dimorphism in human intelligence on two separate studies conducted in 2000 and 2002. They mathematically calculated the male lead over the female in intelligence to be 3.6 IQ points, a finding which they have modestly described as being “negligible�. Furthermore, H. Nyborg (2005) has argued that higher level of male intelligence in general as well as the wider mean distribution directly create those conditions necessary for an “exponentially increased male-female ratio at the high end of the g distribution�. According to Nyborg, this also goes a long way towards providing an explanation for the universality of male patriarchal dominance for untold millennia. Consistent with this body of research, Canadian investigators Jackson and Rushton, in a large standardization sample (2006, where n = 102, 515), reportedly found a male advantage in mental capacity of 3.6 IQ points amongst 17 year olds.
Additionally, Blinkhorn has foolishly criticized Lynn and Irwing for not adopting weighting by sample size, as well as excluding the Backhoff-Escudero study (1996). By resorting to such mud-slinging, Blinkhorn further manifests his complete ignorance of meta-analytic technique as a means of correcting error and bias in research findings. After submitting a number of psychometric tests to a rigorous methodological analysis, Lynn and Irwing managed to isolate a number of moderator variables that could produce differing estimates of gender-based differences in mental capacity. The two researchers found a strong amount of evidence for two such variables; variables which could possibly skew the results for any investigation into sex differences in psychometric intelligence. These were, respectively, (1) the kind of test administered and (2) the tendencies of some universities to selectively recruit brighter men or brighter women. Because of the presence of these strong moderator variables, many of the studies provided biased estimates of the sex difference in psychometric intelligence. A logarithmic graph constructed by Lynn and Irwing and organized around d-score values demonstrates that the is a heavily biased and helps produce a significant underestimate of gender-based differences in mental ability, ultimately making it a statistical outlier. Given the high probability of bias in this sample, to weight it by its sample size (n = 9,048) would produce a serious underestimate of the population sex difference in IQ. Therefore, the authors adopted the methodological principles of meta-analysis as laid down by R. Rosenthal (1995), and took the median estimates, including that of E. Backhoff-Escudero, we end up with a measure in Cohen’s d, which is the difference between two group means divided by the standard deviation of either population group, expressed mathematically as d = M1 – M2 / O (the pooled standard deviation). The Cohen’s d extracted in this situation is .31; this dividend favouring males is again converted into a 4.6 IQ point difference which accurately reflects prevailing trends within general population sex demographic itself. As determined by Messieurs Lynn and Irwing, these calculations demonstrate that there is a preponderance of evidence clearly showing that they have produced an under-estimate in gender-based differences in psychometric intelligence and definitely not the overestimate as Blinkhorn preposterously imagines.
Interestingly enough, Blinkhorn, by employing a similar methodology, uncovers a marginal male intellectual superiority to the mentally inferior female. According to his method, by adjusting the standard deviation of 15 IQ points to 10 IQ points, and weighting the corresponding figure by sample size will inevitably produce a mean difference of 1.5 IQ points (10 x 0.15) still favouring the vastly more intellectually superior male.
Anyone who employs the study of Ian Deary et al (2003) as a means of establishing that there are no gender differences in intelligence either has an ideological axe to grind or has simply not read the paper in its entirety. The study by Deary et al is a study of population sex differences in IQ variability pertaining to a small number of individuals living at a particular socio-historical conjuncture before the Second World War. As the authors clearly point out, its findings are absolutely not generalizable to any group of individuals living before or after the time of the study and is not even applicable to other population demographics. Deary et al says:
The SMS1932 data apply to people whose main educational and occupational attainments occurred from just before the Second World War until retirement in the mid-1980s. Therefore, the distributions of IQ scores represent this specific cohort without necessarily generalising to prior or subsequent cohorts.
The Deary et al study itself happens to be based on considerably antiquated data (an IQ test administered to 11-year-olds in 1932!) at a time in the 1930s and 1940s when the initial tests constructed by Sir Cyril Burt (another fraudulent charlatan like our dear Steve Blinkhorn) and Lewis M. Terman were strongly biased in favour of females. However, the original Stanford-Binet underwent a series of successive re-standardizations involving the subsequent introduction of gender-neutral items replacing those items already biased towards female verbal ability and emotional intelligence. From the 1950s onwards, the tests themselves have become gradually free of bias; even within the frigid atmosphere of gender neutrality enforced by the burgeoning political correctness of the twenty-first century, psychometric testing itself still clearly demonstrates a considerable degree of male intellectual superiority over the mentally inferior female.
From what I understand, the main objective of the Deary et al study is to purportedly reveal the existence and underlying basis of whatever significant differences already exist in the standard deviations between males and females, given the fact that the male variability hypothesis had been long established by a general consensus emerging like a mist from the decadence of late Victorian times. It would seem that the basic idea of the paper is to show that boys, during their childhood development phase, tend to overpopulate the high and low extremes of cognitive ability. Because the findings only apply to gender-based differences in human cognition during childhood, the authors clearly state that their study in no way contradicts the research of Lynn and Irwing, scholars who have vigorously shown, through much of their research, that there are sex differences in innate mental capacity from mid-adolescence to early adulthood. To quote the authors verbatim:
The SMS1932 data apply to childhood and so do not address the debates concerning sex differences in abilities in later adolescence, adulthood, and old age (Hedges & Nowell, 1995). For example, Lynn (1994, 1998) suggests that any male–female mean difference becomes more marked after age 16…
Consistent with this line of reasoning, the authors also admit that N.J. Mackintosh (1998), an academic with strong gender feminist proclivities, agreed with Lynn (1998) that males score significantly higher than females on the Wechsler intelligence test which, even on an international level, is still one of the most commonly administered tests. Further bolstering this claim, a scientific paper produced by A.R. Jensen and C.R. Reynolds (1983) found, on the basis of results obtained from the WISC-R, that the male IQ was 103.08, with a corresponding standard deviation of 14.54; women had a somewhat lower IQ of 101.41, with a corresponding standard deviation of 13.55. Jensen, the great pioneer in understanding race-based differences in mental capacity, typically dismissed male intellectual superiority over the female as being the direct product of a somewhat marginal phenomenon. However, on a deeper level of statistical analysis, the colossal significance of such numbers can be readily seen by immediately converting them into z-scores. This is accomplished by means of the equation z = x (raw score) – mu (mean population score) / sigma (standard deviation). By plugging the numbers from Jensen’s statistical research into the equation itself, we find that there is a 55% probability that the average male is more intelligent than the average female. Alternately, there is a 45% probability that the average female is more intelligent than the average male. Ergo, men are intellectually superior to the mentally inferior female because there are more average men who happen to be much smarter than the average for mean female intelligence.
The proportion of white to gray matter in the male and female central nervous system is largely irrelevant to those scientific facts which lucidly and abundantly demonstrate female intellectual inferiority. Consistent with the research of Haier et al (2003), it has been shown that men have bigger brains than women (d = .30-.35) and have 15% more neurons than the female brain (Packenberg and Gundersen, 1997). The presence of a significantly greater quantity of neurons within the male brain means that men can process and systemize considerably more information and at a much accelerated pace than the retrograde functioning of the primitive, lesser evolved female brain.
Lastly, the“file drawer� effect is the belief that only those papers which prove the existence of gender-based differences in intelligence get published. Those papers that reveal little or no gender difference in mental capacity are presumably archived with little or no recognition from the academic community. This is sheer nonsense. That there is no bias operating here, especially when it comes to the published research of Lynn and Irwing (2004, 2005), is evident from the fact that even Blinkhorn himself observes, in his frequently hysterical rantings, that virtually none of the published literature focusing on Progressive Matrices deals with gender differences. The existence of a large number of studies in print, propagandizing the notion that there are null sex differences and touting the standard ideological pap of second wave feminism, simply undermines the so-called file drawer effect. The fact that 21 out 22 population samples (with the sole exception of Backhoff-Escudero) based on IQ differences between the sexes has shown that men are more intelligent than women simply proves to a sceptical world dominated by the false egalitarianism of an omnipresent liberal establishment that male intellectual superiority is a universal phenomena that must be dealt with at once.
In short, the fact that women are both intellectually and biologically inferior to men is a fact that is fully substantiated by a tremendous amount of experimental data; it is a fact that was first recognized by Paul Broca in 1861 and subsequently confirmed by the great evolutionary biologist Charles Darwin in 1871 and 1874. Of all the major statistical analyses of gender-based differences in mental capacity produced during the present day, 21 out of 22 studies demonstrate that men exceed women in average mental capacity on all psychometric measures of g. Thus, it is impossible that any amount of radical social constructionist theory can ever undermine the fact that the average male is considerably more intelligent than the average female. The notion that males and females are roughly equivalent in mental capacity is not grounded on any firm scientific basis whatsoever. It is a falsehood propagated by generations of gender radicals who have taken the high road of Ms Wollstonecraft’s Folly; they are benighted fools, filled with all the naiveté of a child, who have become fiercely ideologically motivated by the cardinal tenets of Marxist sociological analysis and feminist rhetoric through a gradual process of media-directed brain-washing. Those who continue to propagate the lie that women are the intellectual and biological equals of men are dangerous revolutionaries who have no interest in the substance of external reality or the results of empirical observation itself. Only those people interested in reinforcing their own personal bigotry would dare say that women were the equal of men; the notion of equality between the sexes is not founded on any kind of scientific reasoning whatsoever. Today, men are intellectually superior to women; and far into the foreseeable future, men will always be intellectually superior to the mentally inferior female.
We should stop believing what we wish to believe and break the crystal bubble by trying to see the world as it is; this is the beginning of modern conservatism.
MALES HAVE GREATER GENERAL INTELLIGENCE THAN FEMALES
@Lynn- Your points are good for me to hear, thanks for making them. Maybe what we need is a serious overhall of education for students and adults instead of government regulation of supply (eg control of fast food). It seems like materialism is driven by free speech, but obviously we cant control free speech. I guess gross public awareness movements work to change views in society, and this site maybe an example of a start of one.
@ NMH & Studioline – I belive that there is a great deal of danger in a government that regulates every aspect of life, from how to think, speak, act, and even eat, all under the guise of acting for the best interests of the people. I’m not speaking of the obvious rules of civilized society (murder, theft, etc.), but if people are not held accountable for their own actions, then they will never learn to be responsible for their own lives.
As it stands now, freedom of speach is actually being crushed under the banner of free speech. I watched a clip the other day, of the Berkley/ Code Pink protests of the Marine Corps. I actually saw a pink-swathed woman declare that the Marines don’t have the right to free speech, and that the “protests of the people” needed to be heard. There is this idea that only ignorent, brain-washed kids join the military, so for their “best interests” we need to make sure that they’re not exposed to a dissenting viewpoint.
We can’t talk about racism in this country, for the fear of being automatically branded a racist. I forget which University it was, somewhere in the Northeast, but there was temporarily a program set in place for white men to be “reeducated,” and they were promoting the idea that all white males are actually racists, even if they don’t know it.
I have to worry about my kid being “educated” at school that having sex is ok, as long as they use protection, because after all teenagers are going to do it anyway. The government is taking away my right as a parent to educate my children with my values, and supplementing my value system with someone else’s values, someone who believes that they know better and are doing in it our “best interests.” With that in mind, now people who are acting in the “best interests” of my child are trying to enact legislation that, now that they’re teaching our kids that having sex is ok (as long as it’s “protected”), that they can have abortions without parental notification.
Anyway, getting on a bit of a rant here, but my primary point goes back to personal responsibility and accountability need to take primacy over the idea of “what can the government/ social system do for me?”
karla Says:
April 13th, 2008 at 8:03 am – IP Man-Hash: e2ffdb361b71d
yo yo yo you are a faggottttttttttttt haha i hope you like penis cause that is all youll be getting for this shit in a long as fucking time!
[Quote
I just found this in some other section
look at this, I was just writing about this above
Women think they don’t need to become competent, as long as they have pussy power. What they don’t realise is that they had pussy power, but that pussy power is shrinking.
And what she gets out of being incompetent? she becomes a bitch which she hates. and more men become gay. i dont know how many men are gay but I would say about like 40%??? So what women are useing all this power they have for? to create more gay men? or maybe for putting dildos up their asses?
That’s not the way to go women.
karla Says:
April 13th, 2008 at 8:03 am – IP Man-Hash: e2ffdb361b71d
yo yo yo you are a faggottttttttttttt haha i hope you like penis cause that is all youll be getting for this shit in a long as fucking time!
[Quote
I just found this in some other section
look at this, I was just writing about this above
Women think they don’t need to become competent, as long as they have pussy power. What they don’t realise is that they had pussy power, but that pussy power is shrinking.
And what she gets out of being incompetent? she becomes a bitch which she hates. and more men become gay. i dnot know how many man are gay but I would say about like 40%??? So what women are useing all this power they have? to create more gay men? ofr maybe for putting dildos up their asses?
Feminism is not a factor because there is no feminism no more. Social matix used logo of feminism for the sole purpose of f…- ing women up. Right now we only have pseudo-feminism. Social matrix uses a basic human nature emotion, that whenever sometning goes wrong it must be somebody elses fault. Social matrix is a social pathology in a given time. it is not some group of people. It always creates itself in differnet historical periods. You cant tauch this, you can see this, you can only understand. Women are f… up by being exposed to wrong info about men, therefore, nothing they do works out. They can not blame social matrix cos they can’t see it cos according to social matrix such thing doesn’t exist, so the social matrix tells women to blame men, so that’s what they do. The more they feel f…ed the more angry and frustated they become. And the whole thing escalates. Which is good for the social matrix cos the more people are misserable, the more, they have to buy thing they don’t need. Social matrix is just a pathology that grows because, you can not talk about it exist. It’s a taboo issue of a given time.
people dont succeed because they listen to the matrix. What pepole need to do is to do things right, they just need to become competent. The problem is they can not find info how to to this in the social matrix and for most of them, especially women, matrix is the only source of information.
The only thing women need to do is to be competent about men. that’s how simple and difficult it is. Simple because that’s the only thing they need to do. Difficult, because they do exactly opposite, never listen to men only to the matrix. They want easy way a competent men just show up and make them happy, but for a woman being competent is a task she won’t undertake cos she sais it’s not her job, and because she does’t know how to become competent, best she can do is to argue who is smater and better.
It doesn’t matter who is better because it’s not a competition. But Dick M has a point, women have to be very mentaly lazy not to see that they are being f… up by matrix and that they lost last 40 years, cos they undestand men much less than before feminism, and faminism was an idea oposite to the martix, women lost this idea and only managed to create a new pathology and what they got form it is that men not only hate them, but now start to express theirs frustation and hate and not only undrground.
Sorry I didn’t notice before ( I was suprised so I looked again)
it’s NO manhole ups;)
Hey manhole
Don’t get angry with Anon, he is just not on your level or rather he was not thinking. He just needs to understand, with time he will. Many poeple don’t understand that, unfortunately many of them are so called faminists. They are pesudo-feminists. To bad that movement failed, we all wanted a better world, and look what happend. There are some real feminists men and women, but not to many listen to them, they just want to kill each other.
Personally I think the goverment won’t resolve it, the nature will. I saw it comeing. Women only managed to create a new regime, they fight with men, like they know better, but they are getting further away form the solution, every single day. So thier regime must fall down like every other.
This time it’s the begining. Men have enough of this oppression so much, that even the pussy power, doesn’t work on them any more. Sure not all of them are there yet, but look at Dick M., he just told them NO F… WAY. And he said that in front of all nation, he’s got some balls, I respect him.
I happen to know formula and know exactly where women go wrong, that’s also how I know that they are moving in the opposite direction to where the solution is. And as much I feel them and feel the comassoin for them, and i want best for them, I know they will never find it. I found it and I am sure many men found it too. With time we will teach them the “formula” Im just happy it hapens now not in 50 years from now.
Numero uno, Im a man, dip shit. Numero dos, being a liberal can be consistent with a profound dislike for radical feminism. I’m all for equality of the sexes, but I don’t think women should be promoted in society over men. At the same time, I see the strength of a country with a middle class and feel a liberal democracy best supports this, rather than a more libertarian government. Numero quatro, there are zillion of conservative/Republican women in the USA who would never vote for commie-scum, or even Hilary. So FUCK OFF, dumb Anon-flux-fuck.
“I have to admit I am a liberal with socialist tendencies”"
Yea just like 99.9% of women you twat..
Number one reason why women should not have the right to vote right there. They vote in Socialist-Commie scum every single time.
@Lynn-I have to admit I am a liberal with socialist tendencies–a dangerous admission on this site. I agree with what your saying in that americans are not taking care of themselves as they should, but I think most of them cannot do it, even if someone grabs them by the neck and shakes them. I feel we need government intervention of some kind to prevent people from destroying themselves b/c of influences of Madison Avenue. For example, I feel fast-food may need to be regulated like tobacco. This may mean that local municipalities control how many and where fast food restraunts can operate. I also feel that some support is needed for the poor and disenfranchised because if we were ever to became a libertarian society, say with a minimal flat-tax, the richer would get richer and the middle class would be eliminated, leading to social discord. Therfore, rather than having things like affirmitve action providing specific supports here and there, we need government to effect a transfer of wealth and control to the people that really need it, becauser the poor and dienfranchised simply do not have the will-power to do it themselves. Just my opinion.
Suggestions – instead of “social matrix”, say “social milieu”
sudofominism = pseudo-feminism
Although feminism in its current form has become one of the undermining factors in our society, I think that the idea of discriminatinon in all its possible forms has become the most pervasive issue. The idea is that, unless you’re a white male, if an individual fails to succeed, then the only possible cause is not a from some lack on the part of the individual, but because they were discriminated against.
Politicians, psychiatrists and lawyers set their livlihood on this concept, at the expense of the idea of personal accountability in our society. If a person gets fat from eating too much fast food, sue McDonalds. if a person gets cancer from smoking, sue the tobbacco company. If a child didn’t study and failed a test, then the test was too hard.
We are losing the idea of taking pride in ourselves, that we may succeed by our own merits and hard work. We are getting spoiled by the idea of immediate gratification, and put ourselves in serious debt by placing more importance in possessing an object, by whatever means, than by earning it through patience and prudence.
a little difernet equation – for you
a feminism leads to misery and misery leads to people spending more money on things they don’t need, to make up for their misery.
the last part of equation goes like this;
feminism does not exist any more, it served its purpose long time ago. but a social matrix has picked up on this trend and used frminism as headline, to inslave women. And like in the movie they dont even know it exist. They are only frustrated and look at men to put the blame on, which corresponds to a feminism somehow.
So right now we have a sudofeminism not feminism. the feminism only lead to sudofominism and so on misery ….
The latest science suggests than male and female brains are different. As an earlier poster suggested, intelligence for each gender is localized in different areas of the brain–which may support the idea that men and women do have different strengths (eg Men have better math skills visual spatial ability).
It sounds to me you feel feminism drives materialism in our society; an author named Rich Zubaty feels the same way that you do. I think materialism, though, may no longer be driven by feminism, but it just drives itself. In other words, men and women both see other people living good lives, and so they spend more on crap for themselves, causing others to do the same. Sort of like keeping up with the Joneses. Its just now, under the guise of chivalry, the crap men have to buy women to earn their affections is more expensive.
You don’t have to ask her, she doesn’t know the answer to your question. Brains are not different. Results are not published cos they do not support, the difference theory. This difference theory was created, so women and men can hate each other, which is good for the social matrix. The difference comes form behavioral patterns, after all we are what we repeatedly do. Women behave and think the way they do, because the social matrix supports it and does not allow men to speak up and doesn’t allow women to ever have a chance to became themselves. And it all happens under the shield of “Liberaton of women� and “Feminism� headword, just to deceive us people for what it really is. This way all people are fuc –ed, and more miserable, which is good for the social matrix. Unhappy people just buy more things they don’t really need, so we all instead of being free humans, are just batteries for credit cards. I tried to make it short.
And that is why, the social matrix hates Dick Masterson, cos he at least attempts, to reveal the truth. But dont worry, every regime must finally fall. It first starts as an underground movement, Just like this site. Cheers.
Hi Dick,
Im new to your site.
I have downloaded Dick’s voicemail episode 1
I love it I and I want more of it. Like you said, women are into reading. I prefer to listen.
I’m not sure whether, there are more episodes to download, or are they coming?
I wanna make sure I saved each and everyone of them.
Personally I think you message gets across better by voicemail, than by written responses, Pls make it ongoing.
Pls write info on your site, where to find more of your voicemails. So far I can see only one voicemail to download – the nr 1.
I actually have a friend that runs a laboratory that studies certain aspects of the brain (thats all that I know about what this person does) and SHE (yes, its a she) pointed out to me that a lot of studies that find no gender difference b/n IQ scores are never published b/c its considered to be a negative, and therefore unoustanding, result. Basically, in american scientific research, if a result is no different that the main body of literature published, it probably wont be published in a significant scientific journal or not at all. Ill have to talk to her more about this.
1. Lynn and Irwing’s research has been shown to have a critical flaw, noted by psychometrician Steve Blinkhorn, namely that 45% of the data from which they drew their research was excluded, which demonstrated that there was a difference of only 0.07 of a standard deviation, or that males only answered on average 0.4 more items correctly than females out of 60. They drew their median from the information that was left over:
“The 10 studies with estimated differences above the median cover a total of only 2,591 participants, whereas the ten studies with differences below the median include 15,735 participants. The four largest differences come from samples of 111, 173, 124, and 300, the four smallest from samples of 844, 172, 9,048 and 1,316. Choosing to use the median is a flawed and suspect tactic.�
2. Evidence against differences in overall average IQ scores between men and women comes from several very large and representative studies. Deary et al. (2003) performed an analysis of an IQ test administered to almost all children in Scotland at age 11 in 1932 (>80,000). The average IQ scores by sex were 100.64 for girls and 100.48 for boys. The difference in mean IQ is not significant. However, the standard deviation was 14.1 for girls and 14.9 for boys. This difference was statistically significant. In the sample studied, 49.6% are girls and 50.4% are boys. Because of the difference in variance between the sexes however, girls are in excess by 2% in the middle IQ range of 90–115. At the extreme IQ ranges, 50–60 and 130–140, boys make up 58.6% and 57.7% of the population (a gap of 17.2% and 15.4%) respectively. That is, boys were overrepresented amongst the lowest and highest IQ groups.
3. 2005, Haier et al.: compared with men, women show more white matter and fewer gray matter areas related to intelligence. The brain areas correlate with IQ differences between the sexes, with the conclusion that men and women apparently achieve similar IQ results with different brain regions. Although women may have smaller brains than men, they appear to have greater neuron density in their prefrontal lobe, which is involved in higher functions such as planning, judgment, and language, although men still have higher absolute grey matter volume than women in their prefrontal lobe.
4. A recent report by the National Academies in 2006 found that female performance in high school mathematics now matches that of males, and expressed that if biology were the basis of the change, then major evolution has occurred in the past decades. In addition, the report found that there were lower numbers of women in the mathematics and science fields than there should be even when studies based on biological differences, childbearing demands, and hormonal differences were looked at. The report concluded that women were the subject of unintended bias in these fields. (Bias or no bias, people are responsible for their own choices. Claiming that you can’t do a thing because there is a bias is a cop-out. It’s called personal responsibility.)
I concede that on while average, there are more males than females on both the highest and lowest ends of the spectrum, that doesn’t go to say that there ARE no females included on those ends of the spectrum. Although there is more variance in males, the average levels of intelligence are pretty much the same, with differences only being noted (in favor of both genders) based upon the type of test given. Generally speaking, average = the majority of people on the planet. As you only acknowledge research that falls in line with your own desired outcome, your argument that the majority of women on the planet are intellectually inferior to men is based upon your personal bias, and not on sound scientific reasoning.
The notion that women are intellectually inferior to men is one of the cornerstones upon which the modern psychometric investigation into gender-based differences in both fluid and crystallized intelligence, expressed as global mental capacity, is based. In fact, female intellectual inferiority can be readily demonstrated on the basis of that elementary principle of physiology which states that larger brain size = higher intellectual capacity. Thus, it has been established that men exceed women in brain size by an average of .78d. When this is multiplied by the .45 mean correlation between brain volume and g relationship derived from the research of Shoenemann et al (2000), we are left with a standard deviation of 0.351. Further multiplying this figure by 15 (the unit conversion of SD into IQ points) produces a male lead in average intelligence by about 5.265 IQ points. Therefore, because the average man has a significantly bigger brain than the average female, it can be mathematically calculated with ease that the average male is considerably more intelligent than the average female; the greater size of the average male brain in comparison to the female is central to being able to fully comprehend male intellectual superiority over the lesser mental capacity of the female.
In addition, it has been further argued by the British psychologist Richard Lynn that relative brain size and mental capacity is highly correlated; because men have larger brains than women it follows logically that men have higher levels of intelligence than women. Lynn also notes, on the basis of current psychometric research, that occupational status and income are also highly correlated with intelligence; men have greater occupational status and income than women, therefore men have higher levels of intelligence than women. Even the greater male advantage in mean intelligence, estimated by both Lynn and Irwing (2005), in their meta-analysis of gender-based differences in global intelligence as revealed on the highly g-loaded Progressive Matrices, as being roughly .33d or 5 IQ points, cannot be interpreted as being statistically insignificant.
Whether we accept a determination of the gender gap in mental capacity as being the equivalent of 8.4 IQ points in favour of males as uncovered by Stumpf and Jackson or Lynn and Irwing’s measure of male-female differences in global intelligence as being approximately 5 IQ points, it would be foolhardy to dismiss these results as being of little consequence. The effect of even a 5 IQ point gap favouring males in gender-based differences in intelligence is ultimately translated into an exponentially increased series of male-female ratios at the higher end of the normal distribution curve of intelligence. Therefore, the male advantage over the lesser intelligent female would be formulated as a ratio of 2.3:1 with IQs exceeding 130, 3:1 with IQs exceeding 145, 5.5:1 with IQs exceeding 155, and 30:1 with IQs exceeding the range of 170. Consistent with the foregoing, Benbow (1992) and Benbow et al (2000) both observe that male intellectual superiority over the lesser evolved and smaller brained female is most likely revealed in tasks of high complexity such as problem-solving with high level abstractions in mathematics, engineering, physics as well as other tasks calling for high degrees of spatial visualization, the sex-typical neurological specialization for which has been heavily integrated into the male central nervous system by a process of gradual biological evolution.
In light of the entire discussion so far, it follows that the greater advantage of the average male in both relative brain size and intelligence should also go a long way in providing an explanation for the omnipresence of male dominance throughout all social, economic, and political institutions around which human civilization is organized. The greater variability in male intelligence as opposed to female, as the German-British psychologist Hans Eysenck has pointed out, has tremendous implications for the socio-economic and political organization of human socio-sexual relations. It produces a significantly greater proportion of males at either end of the normal distribution curve of human intelligence. For example, it can be shown from the research of Benbow (1988) that of those students between the ages of 12 – 15 who scored over 700 on the mathematical section of the Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT), there was a ratio of 12.9 boys for every one girl. Thus, it is results such as these which help explain why a disproportionate number of those positions requiring high levels of intelligence or spatial and technical ability are always occupied by men; it helps elucidate the reasons as to why male patriarchal dominance has been both universal and psycho-physiologically inevitable throughout all societies and cultures.
In the final analysis, it would seem that the radical gender feminist theory of a ‘glass ceiling’, in which women face constant discrimination from men resulting in the routine social exclusion of women from the professions and senior level positions in industrial management, is shameless drivel. Male intellectual dominance over the lesser evolved and mentally inferior female is a product almost exclusively of genetic factors; it has absolutely nothing to do with the false ideological construct of male chauvinism, which essentially constitutes a theoretical leftover from the days when Marxist sociological analysis was fiercely advocated by the now defunct Frankfurt School of Dialectical Materialism.
The aforementioned material clearly demonstrates that female intellectual inferiority is an established scientific fact, proven by the most rigorous experimental methodology. For all of those individuals who have enormous difficulty reading the fine print, I will recapitulate: THE OVERWHELMING MAJORITY OF WOMEN ON THE SURFACE OF THE PLANET ARE INTELLECTUALLY INFERIOR TO MEN. WOMEN ARE A LOWER FORM OF HOMO SAPIENS DESIGNED BY BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION TO BE IN COMPLETE SUBJECTION TO MEN. It is precisely for this reason that women possess much smaller brains and considerably lower levels of intelligence than the human male. All women, except for the most masculinized amongst them, were created by nature to be owned by the considerably superior male patriarchal rulers of human civilization.
Genius IQ actually starts at 145, dumb-dumb. Reference: http://www.increasebrainpower.com/iq-scale.html
I laughed so hard at that part. She just looked fucking shocked. Like.. Wow.. Hahahahah. That was the most win I’ve seen in so long.
Let me tell you a secret about IQs. It’s your ability to learn. Not how much you know. Your IQ doesn’t mean shit if you don’t have knowledge to back it up with. Dumbass.
I love how that fat bitch on Dr. Phil got owned! And, if you’re a man and you don’t think that you’re better than most (not all) women, then you’re a fuckin pussy.
Dude, seriously?
This was your aspiration? To profit by degrading the opposite sex? This isn’t breakthrough man. You’re just a controversial mofo that is going to expire shortly. Have fun while you are it.
Oh btw, you got my attention. I took the time to post on this dirt bag site and now I hate myself for it. Congrats, I am a loser and you’re the F’n man. The world is a better place with you in it, because you serve as contrast – Douchebag!
Land skapping thats because all girls do is buy STUPID SHIT so they can put it in the backyard and spend your money.
what is your opinion on women who hate themselves so much they take testosterone shots to change their sex?
*sigh*
Here we go again. Shall I repeat my statement on the opposable thumb theory?
Save your Happy Meal insults for someone else, lest you end up resorting to repetitively applying the same insult to others. The thing is, you lost the ability to effectively insult me when you began inserting false scientific data into your posts. I can respect someone, even if I don’t like their point of view, as long as they back up what they say with accurate information. As you cannot prove your points without tapping into your “creative side,” you do not have my respect.
Even worse, it seems to me that you desperately need validation from people that you don’t know for the measure of your intelligence. Otherwise, why bother posting your IQ score? How many times is it now that you’ve bragged on your own intelligence? That tells me that you lack self-confidance.
Anyway, I have no doubt that you will post yet another lengthy reply to my statement, rife with venom, and then concluding with once again touting your own intellectual superiority.
(Or, you won’t, because you don’t want to prove me right. Personally, though, I don’t think you can stand not getting in the final word.)
Either way, frankly, I’m bored with this conversation.
@CS-Darwin’s and Paul Broca’s conclusions about the superiority of larger brains within a species have been largely dismissed, dumb-fuck. Furthermore, you missed the salient points of the IQ guassian curves and I had to point this out to you. There is absolutely no way that you surpass me in scientific knowledge–I completely kick your pathetic ass here. Furthermore, I don’t lie about the facts like you do. Go get some spankings from Mistress Alexis–but maybe this time you’ll be smart enough to stuff the ball gag in your mouth before she enters your filthy apartment, in an effort to save your welfare money, you chronic-lying 5′2″, 300 lb, impotent sack of shit.
That’s weenie-boy, you Anglo-fuck moron.
I strongly suggest that you both take a remedial reading course; it is well-nigh obvious that the two of you have the severest of difficulties replicating the correct English orthography in your posts.
As you two Anglo-cunts on cheeseburger restricted diets might well enough have guessed, I reserve my chivalry for my books; so you must apologize for the grave indelicacy of certain of the more crude Anglo-Saxon expressions I employ as I vacillate between the directly inflammatory and the relatively inoccuous in my writings.
On a theoretical-philosophical note, I think that the current condition of malaise which permeates so much of modern western society can only be eliminated by a direct frontal assault on the last vestiges of whatever remains of medieval chivalry and what Schopenhauer called “Teutonico-Christian stupidity.” Thus, the kid gloves of the polished homme des belles lettres must come off. It can only be my sincerest and most sage counsel that you stick to sexually harassing Doubt from now on, rather than making embarassingly stupid remarks in a contest of obviously unequal wits; you being but so lightly armed for the fray.
You know, concerning gender-based differences in mental capacity, it is obvious that the overwhelming majority of women are rather quite stupid; given the fact that the average intelligence of the human female has been measured to be between 5 IQ points to almost one standard deviation below the mean distribution of average male intelligence, the statistical probability of any woman exceeding me in intelligence is anywhere between one in twenty and one in thirty. Rest assured, mademoiselles, that there are no women of high intelligence; all the women of high intelligence are men. Thus, you can be certain that the chances of any woman being more intelligent than myself are rather quite remote; on a site such as this, the odds are astronomical.
I take it that you all know full well that female intellectual inferiority is a proven scientific fact. Even the great English naturalist Charles Darwin (1871, 1874) was fully cognizant of the fact that male intellectual capacity is significantly greater than whatever limited mental capacity the human female possesses. Interestingly enough, the limited mental capacity of the human female also approaches the level of borderline mental retardation much more closely than the male does; thus, the great majority of women are, in effect, permanently suspended in a state of perpetual intellectual childhood.
In short, I think it’s time you two Yankee Anglo-fuck whores ordered out another McHappy Meal or whatever strange array of greasy fast food you Feminazi Anglo-cunts are addicted to eating in copious quantities. I think it’s all the cholesterol you Anglo-cunts consume that make Yankee females some of the most uppity whores in the entire Western hemisphere.
Damn, these Cheeseburgers that Lynn is making taste great! And the fries…oh, just the way I like them…equal portions of potatoes and grease. Lynn and I are having a fat feast here in hot damn America….
Im really a woman, Commander Scott. And Its clear to everybody that with my marginal intelligence at the level of a chimpanzee, that I am smarter than you. I have humiliated you. Your done here, wennie-boy. So long.
I’m guessing that you must be having a really bad week. I can’t say as I’ve ever seen you quite this worked up before. Would it help if I started speculating on your possible Australopithecine heritage? Maybe if I threw some epithets at you?
Honestly, judging on how exciteable that you’ve gotten lately, I’m drawing the conclusion that you really do believe that no manhole is a man. If he can do all that, and not get you to this level of frenzy, than I must assume that this is a female-specific reaction.
Anyway, gotta go. Sorry, I can’t say as I have the amount of free time that apparently you do, I’ve actually got work to take care of. Hope your day gets better.
Besides, it’s rather uncomfortable to sit at the computer hours on end when I’ve got cheeseburgers stuck in various bodily orifices. They chafe something awful.
By the way, where is everybody (Muzalon, SotS, gwallan, Arbalest, P Coderch etc.)? The levels of estrogen and progesterone on this website have reached positively insufferable proportions! I feel as if I’m drowning in a flood of estrogen!
Pseudo-intellectual? Ha! Can’t you tell, through your ideological blinders, that I have the IQ of a genius (over 150)? Morons! I’m intellectually superior to 99.99% of all the people that post here! Ciao.
Oh, Lynn! There you go again trying to encapsulate my rather complex, quite sophisticated personality by using the simplistic diagnostic terminology of individual-level psychopathology. How can you tell me anything about myself given the fact that empirically based covariation never constitutes an adequate condition for the methodological demonstration of causation itself? Essentially, what you’re trying to do is explain away the power of my rhetoric by means of invoking the fallacy of post hoc ergo propter hoc. You can’t tell me anything about myself based on that faulty reasoning, you narrow-minded commie pinko bigot! I think you need to take your very small female brain and go back to the drawing board again!
Lynn, you are a very typical Yankee female; I strongly suggest that your considerably smaller female neurological apparatus pursue a course in elementary logic. I’m not sure how smart you are (I am supposing that you are rather quite stupid on the basis of both conventional female neuro-endocrinology and your obviously gramatically incorrect posts), but I would strongly recommend a cursory perusal of the Logic of J.S. Mill.
Your inane remarks, together with those of your fellow Bolshevik comrades in the gender revolution, reflect both the sub-normal level of female intelligence and how rudimentary the human female is in brain structure. As a matter of fact, you very much remind of Lavrentiy Beria, the head of the old Stalinist NKVD, who was fond of having his political opponents shipped off to the gulags after having them diagnosed with labels derived from traditional psychopathology as a means of neutralizing dissent. You really are a rather quite ignorant, foolish harridan. Don’t you know that R.D. Laing long ago disproved many of the basic pre-suppositions of psychiatry? Well, what can one possibly expect from a typically primitive, lesser evolved Yankee Anglo-fuck such as yourself? Labelling others with the language of individual-level psychopathology is typical of the disordered psychological functioning of left-wing authoritarian personalities like yourself (the only form of mental pathology that can be proven to exist), especially given the fact that the overwhelming majority of women happen to be intolerant bigots given to excessive moralizing.
I sincerely hope, Lynn, that Osama bin Laden, the Yankee-killer, sends jet aircraft to every major city in the United States and you, inadvertently but explicably, end up being killed. However, I think the best way to solve the Yankee female problem in that emasculated matriarchy you call the United States (where men are routinely castrated by the likes of feminist radicals such as youself) is to round up every woman in that shit-hole, gather them all in Washington D.C., and drop one massive nuclear device upon their heads!
KABAAM!
Dick……..will you adopt me?
Hmm, did a little research, seems that there is a tendency for the terms to be used interchangeably. I had understood them to be separate terms. Here’s a brief article that I found that addresses some of the issue:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=what-psychopath-means
and another:
http://www.mcafee.cc/Bin/sb.html
Either way, I pity the housekeeper that has to keep all the severed body parts dust free.
No, a psychopath is someone who has a tenuous hold on reality, and has a very difficult time functioning in normal society. I can’t think of the name offhand, but a perfect example is this individual who after killing his victims, cut out their organs, stuck them in a blender and drank them because he was convinced that the blood in his veins was drying up. Didn’t kill too many people because he was nuts. Ed Gein is another good example, which is why I referenced him earlier.
Sociopaths are people who lack the normal range of human emotion, namely the ability to empathise with others. These are the type that have the classic three signs of arson, bed wetting and cruelty to animals. They are perfectly capable of functioning in society, usually intelligent, and many times seem like the most charming person you’ve ever met. Often too, there is the flashpoint temper, which is rarely seen. Generally, a big trigger point is if they don’t feel they have control over a situation, because more often than not they are control freaks. This is the Ted Bundy “type.”
Hmmm…I read somewhere that a sociopath and a psychopath were the same thing. Interestingly, I did call CS, very early on, an “intellectual psychopath, along the lines of Ted Bundy”. But its clear from his lack of ability to understand the chief points in a graph that we must leave out the word “intellectual”. I think “pseudo-intellectual” fits him perfectly. I guess I see CS as a man really wanting to have some kind of power to make up for some kind of defeicency in his life.
@ CS: Interesting. You’ve been insulted by plenty of women on this website, and yet no one else besides myself have elicited that degree of antagonism from you. I’ve only made about three or four “glib, smart-alecky” comments, aside from about two posts where I blasted you on the Marie Curie thing. I haven’t called you names that I recall, nor used foul language at you. So, I have to wonder, what is it about my posts in particular that has you frothing in a particularly apopalyptic frenzy? I half imagine spittle is sprayed over the better part of your computer screen at this point.
If short riffs from me get you so worked up, why would you want me to write something longer? Personally, with the amount of time you spend on the computer, I’m amazed that you have the time to spare on your Anglo-hunts through the wilderness. I commend your ability to so successfully manage your time.
I mean, there is a certain amount of time that one must devote to the craft in order to do it successfully, to include selection of the victim, luring the victim into an isolated setting, conducting the hunt, and then disposing of the remains in such a manner as to avoid detection. I mean, if you’re working in a remote area, it’s hardly wise policy to conduct your hunts within a limited population, as reducing the pool gets noticible after a while. Then, you have to ensure that the bodies are either disposed of in a location that either precludes discovery, or you’ve got to spend a lot of extra time ensuring that traces of yourself are erased as effectively as possible.
Maybe you’re flying women in, which once again if you’re working in a remote area, at a small airport someone might notice that you keep flying women in, but not flying them out again. Got to be careful about that.
then there’s all the time harvesting, preserving, freezing, etc. of random body parts. If you’ve got an Ed Gein complex, chances are you’re going to slip up soon as your hold on sanity decreases.
Although, from the somewhat dubious lucidity of your posts, I’d argue against your being a psychopath. I’m leaning more towards sociopath, although your inflated statement above, and the relative ease by which your buttons appear to be pushed, argue more towards the latter end of Ted Bundy’s career where he lost control of himself and got really sloppy, so be careful of that.
Is it frustrating to hunt homo-sapiens with limited brain capacity? I’d imagine that the thrill of the hunt must pall somewhat when your target keeps blundering into trees, or maybe just the same tree over and over. I’d recommend marking a path through the trees. Use big red signs that say “SALE!” That gets women going in the right direction every time.
I have to wonder, though, is where do you find the space to keep all your trophys? I have a hard time getting the groceries in the freezer, let alone a large collectin of random body parts. Once again, assuming thta you’re working in a remote wilderness, I hope that you don’t lose power over there. I’d hate to think of the smell of all that once it starts going bad. I’d stick with taxidermy, if I were you. If nothing else, it would save on electricity, plus as an added perk you could maintain the tactile experience of human skin. Also, the money that you save on power could go to cost of fuel, maintenance and boarding for your private plane, that stuff really racks up in cost.
Now that I think of it, though, the fact that you make up your scientific research, instead of actually doing the reading it takes to have accurate facts at your disposal, must be a real time saver. I wish I had thought of that.
I hope that I’ve made a post of sufficient length for your satisfaction. I can’t promise to keep this up, however. I’m just too darn busy.
@Commander- you scaring nobody. Please feel free to let me know where you live, and ll be happy to pay you a visit.
@ Commander Scott: Seriously? Dude…it’s time for your meds.
Why are you always sitting on the sidelines making glib, smart-alecky comments while contributing absolutely nothing of substance to the conversation at hand? You know what? You exemplify nothing other then the typical snorting white Anglo-fuck on a cheeseburger-restricted diet whose most valuable assets probably include a useless B.A. in basket-weaving and a spineless bank account for a husband you can sponge off whenever you feel like.
By the way, Lynn, did I ever tell you that one of my most engrossing pastimes involves kidnapping American, Canadian, British, and Australian women and using them for target practice in the remote wilderness of some distant mountain retreat? I am certainly one of the few great enthusiasts of hunting and killing lazy, fat Anglo-Saxon females with both my rifle and bowie knife. I do it not only as a means of improving my gamesmanship, but because I also enjoy collecting trophies from the bodies of dead white Anglo-fucks like yourself; I have a large collection of severed breasts, nipples, pubic hair, female torsoes and vaginas soaking in jars of formaldehyde. You would positively love to see my collection of white female body parts! Do you know why hunting and killing ignorant Anglo-cunt whores like yourself is so enormously advantageous for seasoned hunters like myself? It’s not only because every single white Anglo-Saxon fuckface cunt on the surface of the planet deserves to be doused with gasoline, hung from a tree and then burnt alive; it’s also because sick Anglo-fuck cunts always make such ridiculously easy prey, especially Aussie, Yankee and English Saxon whores.
The Anglo-fuck cunts who talk about white pride and Hitler as a means of cajoling me into sparing their lives always bring a faint smile to my lips. As if I should let you live because we’re both white… Let me tell you a little something, all you frigid Anglo-Saxon whores who happen to be trembling on the point of death: “morituri morituros salutant”; firstly, I don’t give a fuck about any woman; secondly, if you come to me draped in the Nazi swastika, I’ll rip your clothes off and, with my pretty bowie knife that glistens in the sun, carve that swastika into the naked, quivering female flesh before my eyes; and lastly, you can stuff your neo-Nazi ideology up your frigid cunt back where it came from, you frigid Anglo-Saxon whore who deserves her eyes gouged out of her skull!
The only real accoutrements one needs to bring in order to catch a lazy, overweight Anglo-fuck for the purposes of being hunted and skinned alive is a car load of french fries and cheeseburgers. I’m being absolutely serious; no bollocks here! Sometimes, all one has to do is find a local haunt where Yankee-English Anglo-fucks generally congregate; I then proceed to leave a small trail of cheeseburgers and french fries from the doors of the bar or club to the doors of my vehicle. It is a remarkably effective way of catching large numbers of snorting Anglo-fuckface cunts who can’t stop boasting about their boyfriends. On good nights, I’ve even managed to capture 4 or 5 Anglo-fucks in rapid succession on a single night! Apparently, from a strictly taxonomic point of view, the white Anglo-Saxon female is a species of sub-human animal, of degenerate physiology and below average intelligence, who can only survive in concrete jungles on a strict diet of Burger King and McDonalds. With Anglo-cunts like these, it’s no wonder hunting and killing women has become such big business!
In conclusion, Lynn, shut the fuck up and go get your greasy paws on some of those cheeseburgers and french fries you lazy, overweight Anglo-fuck cows gorge on in order to survive. Have you finished your last Happy Meal? Here’s another cheeseburger, you English-Yankee cunt who deserves a flask of nitric acid thrown in your filthy, rotting face. Are you out of french fries too? Here you go, you Yankee pig; stuff your fat, ugly AIDS-infected Anglo-fucking cunt with more. But don’t push me too far, because I’ll start force feeding you cheeseburgers, you Yankee, English, Canadian whore who deserves to be brutally raped with a speculum and beaten to death with an ice pick. Go fuck yourself, you sub-human Anglo-whore. Who asked you to open your mouth?
What’s that you say, you neurasthenic Anglo-Saxon bitch? You need to take a shit now? You need toilet paper to wipe your 300lb fat ass with? Here’s your B.A. degree in communications or fine arts or whatever the fuck it was you wasted your time with. Go wipe your rump with that, you Anglo-cunt fuckface whore puke who deserves to have her head busted in with a baseball bat.
You are awesome. No speech, just keep doing your thing.
umm i would like to know something umm men are lazy if u did not wont us to vote or do anything then why did u get so lazy thats how women step it up and got jobd better than u make more money than u ……. i am a girl and i landscape in the summer hmmmm also if u think ur so cool try having a kid lol i laugh u boys are so dumb i am not going to lie girls are slut if they choose to but the girls who are not will they have made it far for ex. i have bet out guys at jobs that “are for men” and men hire me its funny lol that nw girls are doing ur work lol losers
Your site is HILARIOUS!!!! Hahahahahahaha… I love the way you break women down HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA…. I wish I could say keep up the great work, but my kind would hate me….(Im a Girl), I wanted to keep out but I COULDNT which proves everything you say is RIGHT ON!
Of course, I disagree with a bunch of things you say….but YOU are a visionary…its true… There should be more people out there like you.
Finally, a guy that tells it LIKE IT IS! You have no idea how badly it sucks to have been born a woman.
goddamn, about time a real man stood up and said what needed to be said. GODSPEED TO YOU, SIR. im with you on this one.
Mate, tip of the proverbial cap to you, because you are a hero, and you’re website, truly heroic.
The Blackberry thing in particular had me in stitches. Let’s just get on with the job like men :D
dude. i agree with you. women are basically no good. from experience, all the y do is get what they want from you, and leave. They want money, cars, sex, whatever. I fell for that shit and i have wasted so much money and time on them. screw women.
LMAO. this shit is too good. everybody quit getting worked up, this is obviously a clever ploy to sell and i must say a succesful clever ploy at that judging by the publicity this site and your book are getting. dick, the shit you are spewing is to outlandishly ridiculous to be considered fact. dick, and i doubt that is ur real name, i applaude u on the idea and how its blown up
Aww Common fucking jewtube, “this video is no longer available” :(
ummm. . . dude i really dont know wether to agree wit u or to tell u that u probly never been laid in your life i mean did u get a bad pussy or did u relize that girls love assholes but play it off like they want a good guy yo like no lie lemme kno if this shit get u laid mutha fucka i will play this game if it works lmao
Its called development sweets. No wonder women are paxil and prozac guzzling emo wrecks. They’re underdeveloped since incubation.
Wow, I’m surprised anyone would actually publish such an offensive, discriminating piece of writing, but I guess anything is possible in America.
This is why I’m proud to be British!…
And actually, there is more to most women than enslaving men and using children to get money, i.e. benefits.
Some women work very hard and earn a decent amount of money for themselves, just as any man would according to you, though yes, there are dirty whores roming the streets out there just to use men, but not all, just a minority. But who is to say that there isn’t a reverse??? Not all men work their asses off as you put it, it can be quite the opposite. Some men sit around on their sofas watching TV all day when their wifes/girlfriends are out earning money for the family, actually achieving something, whilst all the man learns about is the names of all the Simpson characters there are in the Simpsons, or if they’re really mindless, watching BBC Bitesize (This is a revision program they put on for kids of different ages to help them with their school work, you probably don’t have anything like that in America) and learning how to count before the wife/girlfriend finds out that he can’t count how many times he’s got out of his groove in the sofa in one day when she gets home from work and asks him what he’s achieved that day,
which, quite honestly, would be, NOTHING.
Oh, and before I finish, that stupid tagline at the top that says “Writing is for ladies. Say it instead. Leave a message.” is the stupidest thing I’ve read in a long time.
If writing is for ladies, what about William Shakespeare, one of the most intelligent writers who once lived. Work that out.
Oh yeah, and all men start off as female when in the women’s womb before they’re born. Suck off that, Einstein.
also if you dont know how to write your a lame
great men have wrote great books you moron
first off let me say you are an ignorent fagget you sound like a homo who has never got laid.
NOW WITHOUT WOMEN YOU WOULD NOT BE HERE!
MY LADY HAS A JOB AND GOES TO SCHOOL AND HAS HELPED ME WHEN I WAS DOWN ON MY LUCK.
THIER ARE RESPECTABLE WOMEN OUT THIER you just have to find them.
my boss is a woman you fuckin lame eat a dick
i love woman and respect them your mom didnt do a good job rasing you dont mean my hasnt my mom is one of the best moms in this world yours must of been a whore him me up if you wanna talk shit i dont care
You know, at this rate, at some point CS is going to make the case that men are smarter than women because it’s been scientifically proven that men have opposable thumbs, and women don’t.
Interesting technique he has, though. Just add the phrase “scientifically proven,” to your post, then whatever you write must be true.
Commander Scott, are you saying you’d like to blow me? I’m happy to oblige cause tongues don’t have a gender, especially when I close my eyes. Aaah. Call me sometime, loverboy.
Thanks for the clarification but I can’t factor anything into the equation based on heresay or research that is at minimum 9 years old.
You seem like one of the few serious posters to this site. Whether or not the research you cite is or was valid at time of publication, you mention serious issues such as child abuse. You state that women commit this more often than men. The pool of female perpetrators you are referring to, is however, quite specific. They are typically only either mentally ill (post-partum depression (child neglect) or post-partum psychosis (child abuse) can be included in this classification of mentally ill; and/or substance abusers, and in most cases, they have a male partner who is a substance abuser (usually alcohol). As such, there is a man in the picture, and I think you are doing a disservice when you forget that, or simply fail to mention it.
It’s significantly later than much of the stuff still used by feminists or NOW or the domestic violence industry. These are the primary forces trying to force men out of the lives of children.
If you like please also figure into the equation that women are responsible for over two thirds of all child abuse(even if you include sexual abuse) up to and including murder. Similar to this is elder abuse. Overall women are more abusive than men in domestic settings.
Actually, the KKK was started after the “southern confederacy” was defeated and dissolved by Union forces in 1865, you corpulent austalopethicus-look-alike, spanked-by-prostitutes, chronic-lying sociopathic dumb-ass!
Actually, his most recent citation is from 1999. Learn how to read properly, you frigid western whore.
gwallen, do you have any recent references and ones that aren’t culturally specific? Your most recent citation is from 1992…out of date perhaps?
Except that women initiate more than three quarters of divorces. Seems that women aren’t capable of real commitment. It’s actually women doing the deserting. There are as many cheating women as men – by definition. The men you say “got themselves in prison” almost certainly were raised by single mothers.
Yes! Blame it on the single mothers. The outcomes are horrific for their kids and it’s the choices made by those women that create those outcomes…
On fatherlessness…(possibly some duplication)
63% of youth suicides.
Source: US Dept. of Health & Human Services, Bureau of the Census
71% of pregnant teenagers.
Source: US Dept. of Health & Human Services
90% of all homeless and runaway children.
Source: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Special Report, Sept 1988
70% of juveniles in state-operated institutions come from fatherless homes
Source: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Special Report, Sept 1988
85% of all children that exhibit behavioral disorders.
Source: Center for Disease Control
90% of homeless and runaway children are from fatherless homes.
U.S. D.H.H.S., Bureau of the Census.
80% of rapists motivated with displaced anger come from fatherless homes.
Criminal Justice & Behavior, Vol 14, p. 403-26, 1978.
60% of repeat rapists grew up without fathers.
Raymond A. Knight and Robert A. Prentky, “The Developmental Antecednts of Adult Adaptations of Rapist Sub-Types,� Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol 14, Dec., 1987, p 403-426.
71% of pregnant teenagers lack a father.
US Dept. of Health & Human Services press release, Friday, March 26, 1999.
63% of youth suicides are from fatherless homes.
US D.H.H.S., Bureau of the Census.
85% of children who exhibit behavioral disorders come from fatherless homes.
Center for Disease Control.
90% of adolescent repeat arsonists live with only their mother.
Wray Herbert, “Dousing the Kindlers,� Psychology Today, January, 1985, p.28.
71% of high school dropouts come from fatherless homes.
National Principals Association Report on the State of High Schools.
75% of adolescent patients in chemical abuse canters come from fatherless homes.
Rainbows for all God`s Children.
70% of juveniles in state operated institutions have no father.
US Dept. of Justice, Special Report, Sept. 1988.
85% of youths in prisons grew up in a fatherless home.
Fulton Co. Georgia jail populations, Texas Dept. of Corrections, 1992.
75% of prisoners grew up without a father.
Daniel Amneus, The Garbage Generation, Alhambra, CA: Primrose Press, 1990.
Fatherless boys and girls are: twice as likely to drop out of high school; twice as likely to end up in jail; four times more likely to need help for emotional or behavioral problems.
US D.H.H.S. news release, March 26, 1999.
Dick put his empty mind to work and requested…
I’ve made a choice above. Men are significantly better than than women as single parents. Indeed children from single father homes do as well as those from intact families. The outcomes speak for themselves.
In the long term view of parenthood the desired outcome is kids grown to mature, balanced and capable adults. In this regard men are the vastly superior parents.
Your the best, keep it up.
Great job – give ‘em hell Dick.
There’s an elite percentage of women that aren’t shitty, but the rest needs a wakeup call.
Go Dick ^^
Why are the mothers single? Because the jerk husbands left, cheated, or got themselves in prison. Blame it on the single mothers…what a great argument!
Also, why don’t you like writing? The founders of this country that drafted the US Constitution had to handwrite it out, genius. The MEN WROTE out the right for you to spew your empty mind.
I hope this is some kind of outrageous, satirical hoax created so you can make some easy money.
Don’t slip on your spot lotion, cunt.
balls baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaallssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss ssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss lol
i read about this website on a Dutch blog.
I fckin love u man.
Dont get me wrong I love women, i need a woman in my life, but i am a man i am the boss.
Keep up the good work, totally the truth, I always tell this stuff to my sisters and mother and they always come up with shitty comments or refuse to talk to me.
Greeting from the Netherlands.
Since the “free world” is massed and ruled by degenerate deviants like the both of you scum.. I can foresee it.
But there will be pleasure in simaltaneously wiping out the leader of the Old Order and your blood line.
JY makes some good points actually. I despise pussy whipped males far, far more than I despise the fems.
Women should not have any power in this society, but they do. In fact they have more power than men do, and this is only because we give them that power.
Our real enemies are the males who allow the abuse to go on (marriage, child support, affirmative action, etc.) and not the women who take advantage of those things.
Nah. Our spawn will either be the next leader of the free world or pornography king. Maybe both.
This statement is false. There is only a 5 IQ point difference on average. I would not call a substantial difference. Reference: http://www.iqcomparisonsite.com/SexDifferences.aspx
False. While the male brain has 10% more weight, the female brain has more white matter. However, intelligence seems to be focused in different areas of the female and male brain, taking advantage of the kind of matter that pedominate in the specific brain.
Reference: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/01/050121100142.htm
The previous reference suggests this is true; however, the reference also suggests that women integrate and assimilate information better then males, because they have more white matter.
This statement is false. The latest brain research suggests that there are centers in the male brain that are more metabolically active then the female brain, and vice versa. There are no references to suggest that the male brain has dramatically more metabolic activity, at least ones after 2002 which are considered accurate. As for “Electromagnetic Radiation�: any kind of metabolic activity is never 100% efficient and because of this the activity generates heat, which is a form of ER (IR wavelengths). This energy is lost to the surroundings and is non-functional.
Reference: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12084447?ordinalpos=1&itool=EntrezS ystem2.PEntrez.Pubmed.Pubmed_ResultsPanel.Pubmed_DiscoveryPanel.Pubmed _Discovery_RA
Your repeating yourself again. Your functional autism appears to a chronic case, rather than an acute one.
This statement is meaningless gibberish.
Actually what you mean to say is that the average male brain produces more heat than the female brain, and obviously this has no relation to how readily and quickly it responds to stimuli.
This statement is false. The chimps brain weight is approx 400g. The average human female brain weight is 1000g.
Reference: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/abstract/62000404/ABSTRACT? CRETRY=1&SRETRY=0
Clearly this statement is false. The average IQ of a female is about 102, while mental retardation is below 70.
Good basic resources for the difference between female and male brains:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=his-brain-her-brain
http://sumpfnoodle.blogspot.com/2007/04/male-brain-vs-female-brain.htm l
Manclusion: Commander Scott is a chronic liar, and a fraud. Time for your morning spanking by Mistress Alexis, Commander.
I go away for a hunt one night and I come back to a site flooded with estrogen influence.
I sense a tangable connection between the mangina and the land whale.
You two should absolutely meet and spawn some future Gamestop or food service manager.
lol!
Not to mention the foul smells and the, er, sticky dried-semen stains that have evidently jammed the “return” key on his computer keyboard, and have hardened once-pliable bedsheets. Yuck.
Mistress Alexis probably doesn’t come cheap, in light of the disgusting sight of his pimple-covered hairy butt she’s asked to lash.
You’re probably right. You can really picture the layers of grease and grime over everything in his apartment. I don’t reckon he has the courage to actually leave the place as his obsessive writing smacks of agoraphobia… So I’m not so sure about Mistress Alexis unless she does home visits.
Nah. He’s living in his filthy basement apartment at the Brisbane docks, being payed for by his mother. You see, the welfare checks he receives are being used up for his weekly spankings by his favorite Dominatrix Mistress Alexis. At least that’s my theory.
Commander Scott, through all your verbosity, it is obvious you have cognitive defects, namely the abilty to prioritise information and form clear ideas. You also flirt with science and mathematics, but you don’t have an understanding of what they are actually for. Only a fool could be bamboozled by your posturing into crediting you with intelligence. You probably are being ‘cared-for’ by state funding or your parents. And as for commenting on women, it is a bit strange since you never meet any.
You make some decent points. I am oft fascinated by the fact that young females have a much lower sex drive than older females. From a sociobiological perspective, could it be that older women have evolved a late budding sex drive for the reason you described, to marry/fleece a middle class nice guy when they hit 30? Perhaps it is a faux monogamy they need to present in order to inveigle the sucker from his money. Sociobiology argues that female sexuality is rather more complex than that of the male, which is why we see contradictions of the type you described, young cunts fucking around for underclass sadistic genes, older cunts focussing on monogamy in order to exploit more stable men. As you say, the weak deserve to be punished and viewed with contempt: weak male feminists deserve everything they get. In fact, I think Anglo-American males are just too ‘nice’ to handle women. Everyone knows Anglo males are gentlemen, but are they too gentlemanly? Hispanic men or South Asians beat up women quite casually, or practice honour killing, and it is notable that their birth rates remain very high. My guess is that Anglo puritanism persists more among Anglo males as this ‘gentlemanly’ cultural residue makes them think they are in a Jane Austin novel, when in fact they are surrounded by grasping cunts. Maybe Anglo-American females are such cunts because Anglo men think women are 18th Century ‘Laydees’ or something.
If you ever read Oriana Fallaci, she make it plain that Europe will slide into ‘Eurabia’ unless something is done to arrest Muslim minority birthrates. In Italy, women only have 1.3 kids (and falling), way below what is needed to replace the population. This is echoed in all Western European countries, no indigenous white population has enough kids. So the issue may not be with Middle Eastern nations as such, but with Middle Eastern minorities in Europe who are in fact more committed to Islamic values than the nations they hail from. The same is true in North America, where Hispanics are dramatically out-breeding Anglos. On the whole, I myself think it is not a Kultur Kampf as such, as the West in general and the Anglo world in particular are generally unaware of the fate unfolding around them. The conflict is also not a complex ideological one like WW2: it is based around pragmatic issues like Western white populations not maintaining viable birthrates, while the birthrates of culturally alien minorities are soaring. Obviously feminism is a big influence on that, but there are other influences, like the media and the decline of religion.
The Anglo-American men’s movement is admittedly toothless and shit (our discussion here makes far more sense than their chaff), but many men have cottoned on (as individuals) to some of their core themes, such as Anglo women being cunts and marriage the road to penury. If there was absolutely no increase in male awareness, the feminists would not have had to cook up IMBRA to stop Anglo males from marrying foreign women via dating agencies. Clearly, the long standing Anglo-American feminist agenda of limiting access to sex is at work there, because they know many men prefer a traditional woman to raise kids with, not an Anglo cunt. Ultimately, I can see Anglo cunts just dying out like nuns if Anglo men can get a steady supply of foreign chicks. Probably explains why feminists are so keen to shut the trade down.
I think the Anglo puritan thing is complex, it is only expressed today in particular contexts (consider the ridiculous, hypocritical knee-jerk sentimentality over Weddings) but it is a floating factor that feminists will bring out whenever is suits them (e.g. IMBRA). It also has an influence on primitive Anglo views of what is acceptable sex or not (anything other than Missionary Position hetero sex is tacitly considered ‘perversion’). Also, Anglos tend to remain voyeuristic with regard to experimental sex – it is something to watch, not something to do. So, like women’s shifting sexual strategies at different life-junctures, it is a complex picture.
I’ve seen pieces of freshly laid dogshit that are more intelligent than the overwhelming majority of women on the surface of the planet. God, most women are dumber than fuck!
Female intellectual inferiority is the building block upon which the whole edifice of male patriarchal dominance is based. Most educated people are thoroughly conversant with the fact that the average male is significantly more intelligent than the average female; moreover, the average man possesses a considerably bigger and more complex brain than the average woman. Natural selection equipped women with smaller brains than men because the female neurological apparatus was not designed to handle such tasks as spatial visualization or sophisticated problem-solving with high level abstractions. It should be obvious that neural processing, as it occurs within the male brain, requires large-scale glucose metabolization involving high levels of adenosine triphosphate chemical energy transfers, as well as substantially higher frequencies of neuron-mediated action potentials. It is these processes which help accelerate the pace of long distance communication across the uncharted frontiers of the male brain. Consequently, it can be seen from the aforementioned that the male brain not only generates more electromagnetic energy than the female but also requires considerably more electromagnetic energy in order to function smoothly as one integrated unit.
The neuro-physiological correlates of male intellectual superiority over the less evolved and less intelligent female has already been established by an international team of researchers; the male brain produces significantly more energy than the female; this has already been fully demonstrated by the technique of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) alone. Not only is the size of the brain moderately correlated with level of general mental ability, but so also is the relative velocity of nerve conduction. Some electromagnetic waves produced by the brain demonstrate a 0.5 or 0.7 correlation with human intelligence; a correlation which is much higher than the 0.4 correlation between relative brain size and intelligence.
Therefore, because men are more intelligent and have bigger brains than women, it follows that men require considerably less energy than women when solving problems of great complexity and abstraction. Men produce much stronger electromagnetic waves than women and this enables the average man to respond much more readily and quickly to such barely noticeable stimuli as tones produced at low decibels; because men have greater ‘g’ than women, men process information with much greater accuracy and efficiency.
Conversing with the average female can be such a chore! Women often find it exceedingly difficult to comprehend the more sophisticated male personality. This is because the overwhelming majority of women have been proven to have very small brains (a little larger than that of a full grown chimpanzee) and correspondingly low intelligence. With average female mental capacity slightly above the male level of borderline mental retardation, it should come as no surprise that the overwhelming majority of women find it difficult to do simple mental arithmetic or even spell properly, let alone carry on an intelligent conversation with any degree of coherence with the average man.
Yawn
http://salmonofdoubt.110mb.com/incest4pay.txt
Haven’t you said that one already?
That is what a feminist looks like.
How do you stop a manhole from choking?
Take your dick out of its mouth.
http://salmonofdoubt.110mb.com/bi.txt
Thanks for re-posting my cyber-raping of SOTS. I’m very proud of it xx
http://salmonofdoubt.110mb.com/shame.txt
Her argument. In one sentence, repeated over and over again.
http://www.singleabroad.com/articleasia.html
At least we wasted her time.
No, plenty of people disagree with me about many things, but having observed the accumulation of Doubt’s posts he is obviously a very confused individual with problems coming to terms with a significant chunk of himself. Dare I say it…his ‘feminine’ side.
Right, because he doesn’t agree with you he’s “repressed” Awesome.
Doubt it’s far too boring to follow your links. I don’t know quite what it is that got up your snatch to make you blame feminism for your personal problems, but Doubt, the problem is with YOU. Do some soul-searching as you are clearly repressed. Everything you post screams it out.
JY is functionally retarded.
Let’s cut the shit and look at the facts. Most feminists are rich white girls: True. Most men arrested for sex crimes are black males: True.
Anyone who can not put two and two together is functionally retarded: Fucking true.
By the way, I am immature and I need advice from manhole to keep me out of jail. I don’t know I need it, but I need it because without a white suburban female’s insight into greater society, I might very well be left with my life-experience.
Really, though, read through the bolded parts. Feminism is not a part of the Civil Rights Movement and all feminists are bigots and racists.
“A noteworthy example of the Court’s diffidence on this issue is Maxwell v. Bishop (1970). Maxwell, a black male, received a death sentence from an Arkansas jury for the nonfatal rape of a white woman. The case received particular attention because Maxwell’s attorneys supported with statistical evidence their claim that Maxwell’s death sentence was part of a racially discriminatory pattern. They first offered data showing that, nationwide, 89 percent of the defendants who were executed for the crime of rape between 1930 and 1962 were black.”
- http://www.answers.com/topic/race-discrimination-and-the-death-penalty ?cat=biz-fin
Feminism in its current form has been around for longer than you might think – it’s just taken on different forms; Nazism, censorship, etc.; it’s all about externalizing blame and quite literally is more trouble than it’s worth.
http://salmonofdoubt.110mb.com/wutafaggot.txt
I will only bother responding to your post, as it was really the only intelligent one. Many of the other posters here reflect very poorly on the site, and no one will take it seriously as a result. I don’t know if they are still in high school or they have never mentally matured, but it makes this place look bad.
I agree with this your point that I quoted. People with reading comprehension will understand that I hate feminism completely, but I have to give them credit. In a few decades they have completely screwed over men.
Where I disagree is that a men’s movement will fix things. Again, this is because the majority of men will place the pussy on a pedestal. Just take a look at a lot of the negative comments that feminist men have left on this site. They are your typical ad hominem attacks which make them look stupid. How many men will defend ailomony? You’d think very few would, yet I can find many who think its a great idea. These are your typical “nice” guys who will bend over backwards to please women. These are the weaklings who being failures at life, try to win love and acceptance by having a placating and spineless personality.
Earlier you pointed out a supposed contradiction – if women are such sluts then how can they use sex as a tool to control men? Again, its because the “nice” guys aren’t the ones getting any (I put nice in parentheses because they’re not really nice, just losers). They’re the ones being friend zoned and providing the emotional (and probably financial) support for their female friends. These females will sleep around and after being used up, they settle for a “nice” guy at age 30, then divorce him and take away everything. They can get away with this because there are more than enough guys who will condone this behavior. These men are the same people who will vehemently defend feminism while completely disregarding the fact that they are being walked upon. The siren call of the pussy is too strong.
While america may profess to be a christian nation, in practice its not really. Again I ask, how many people do you know who are virgins? Even among the christians, there are very few virgins. Studies show christian girls who take those abstinence vows just end up having anal or oral sex. The repression doesn’t really stop people from looking at porn, having sex with prostitutes, or having sex in general.
You bring up the middle east, but which culture do you think will win in the long run? The most backwards places in the middle east are also the poorest. Countries like the UAE which are wealthy are far more progressive, and women are treated far better. Obviously, the ignorant and poorer countries in the middle east will not give rights to women. In the long term, if conditions improve there, feminism will come into power.
I don’t really see the situation improving at all.
Feminists do not want you to further your knowledge. Feminists want to repress sites like this because their beliefs can not stand up to criticism.
Observe another example of feminist repression:
http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Missing_White_Womyn_Syndrome
Freedom or slavery?
http://encyclopediadramatica.com/XxPrincessPunkxx
Power or servitude?
http://encyclopediadramatica.com/BitingBeaver
http://salmonofdoubt.110mb.com/bi.txt
I encourage you to further your research. Observe deception, hypocrisy, and racism. All feminists are rich white whores.
http://salmonofdoubt.110mb.com/transvestite.txt
http://salmonofdoubt.110mb.com/wutafaggot.txt
Our side is the side of reason.
So now I have repressed feelings.
Look through her history; witness for yourself the failed abortion that is feminism!
Doubt, you are far too inadequate a human being to piss anyone off. Well…you are a bit irritating like a gnat, but not significant enough to spoil anyone’s day. But anyway, if it helps you to disguise your repressed sexual feelings from yourself, carry on. But I think cruising, cottaging or therapy might be a bit more healthy for you.
I love pissing feminists off; then again, who doesn’t? Anyone who makes themselves an easy target deserves to learn security or humility.
This is pretty lame, Doubt. Really. Go study math.
Next: The ‘You might be a rapist if…’ satire – ‘You might be a manhole if…’
I enjoy the Russian reversal.
My guess was that you are a HS student. Not anymore. Your either a Junior HS or some reform camp student.
Correction:
What’s red and pink and flies around the room?
A manhole with a punctured tit.
Correction: you need multiple drug therapy with several anti-psychotics, and multiple lashes with the sharpened end of a rattan cane over the course of several weeks.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070821064531AAERBhS
What’s funnier than a dead manhole?
A dead manhole in a clown costume!
What’s funnier than a dead manhole?
A dead manhole sitting next to a manhole with down syndrome.
How do you know when a manhole is a dead manhole?
The dog plays with it more.
What’s more fun than feeling up a dead manhole?
Feeling up a dead manhole with three nipples
How do you make a dead manhole float?
Take your foot off of its head.
What’s the difference between a manhole and a trampoline?
When you jump on a trampoline, you take your boots off.
Why are test tube manholes the most beautiful ones?
Because they’re hand made.
What’s brown and gurgles?
A manhole in a casserole.
What’s blue and flies around the room at high speeds?
A manhole with a punctured lung.
What do you call a dead manhole with no arms and no legs in the middle of the ocean?
Fucked.
How do you stop a manhole screaming and crawling round in circles ?
Nail its other foot to the floor.
What do you call a dead manhole with no arms and no legs hanging on your wall?
Art.
What do you call a dead manhole, a rat, 6 week old bread and a gherkin?
A Big Mac.
What’s blue and thrashes about on the floor?
A manhole playing in a plastic bag.
How do you stop a manhole falling down a well?
Stick a javelin through its head.
How many manholes does it take to paint a house?
Depends how hard you swing them.
What’s purple, covered in pus and squeals?
A peeled manhole in a bag of salt.
What’s the difference between a bucket of gravel and a bucket of manhole guts?
You can’t gargle gravel.
What gets louder as it gets smaller?
A manhole in a trash compactor.
What do you call a dead manhole with no arms and no legs laying in a ditch?
‘That’s Life.’
What’s the difference between a manhole and a tree?
One is legal to hit with an axe.
What do you get when you have sex with a pregnant manhole?
A baby with a black eye!
- http://salmonofdoubt.110mb.com/gay4pay.txt
Evidently the dosage of ritalin you are receiving a day (6 x 1000 mgs) is ineffective. Time to move you up to an anti-psychotic medication. Frankly, I would like to see you move to Singapore, commit a minor infraction, and have your ass lashed with a sharpened cane. Aeeeeeee-chaaaaaa!!!!!!!
Did you know that 99% of dead manholes were battered manholes first?
And all this time, I was eating mine plain!
What do you tell a manhole with 2 black eyes?
Nothing. You’ve already told her twice!
Why did the manhole fall out of the tree?
Because, she was dead!
Why are dead manholes such shitty drivers?
Because, they are manholes!
Why did the manhole fall off the swing?
Because, her arms were cut off!
What did the blind, deaf, and dumb manhole get for Christmas?
Cancer!
What do you call a manhole with no legs?
A nightcrawler!
What’s the difference between your job and a dead manhole?
Your job still sucks!
What’s the worst thing about killing a Chinese manhole?
An hour later, you want to kill another one!
What’s the difference between Jello and a dead manhole?
Jello wiggles when you eat it!
What’s the difference between a dead manhole in the road and a dead cat in the road?
There are skid marks in front of the dead cat!
What’s the difference between a Corvette and a dead manhole?
I don’t have a Corvette in my garage!
What do you do if your manhole is running around screaming and bleeding in your hotel room?
Shoot her again!
What’s the difference between an onion and a manhole?
You don’t cry when you chop up a manhole!
says the rabid cunt frothing at the mouth.
it really doesn’t matter which article i post it on, i honestly don’t care..its not like i been reading these shitty articles..i just saw some of the book and that’s all i needed..Dick(perfect name for him) honestly doesn’t care that he’s putting down women all around the world and that there are idiots out the believing everything he’s saying
Its ironic you post such a irrational, emotional hate rant on this of all articles.
you are the biggest ass wipe that i ever seen in my life..why don’t you suck a penis since you sure don’t like pussy..you are a sexist bastard..just go kill yourself..without women on this planet you wouldn’t be able to function..i feel bad for the women who gave you birth..you don’t even deserve to live
JY’s understanding of the Arabic world is absolute hubris and retardation.
That was great. Definitely made my morning. And this JY fag needs to wash the sand out of his clit and shut the hell up. Stop rambling on like a whining ass whore. Grow a set bud. If I wanted to read this much rambling, I’d go to a woman’s site.
Comparatively speaking, Anglo countries are repressive. This is revealed by your assumption that simple sexual intercourse is the zenith of sexual experience. In Continental countries, intercourse is more like bread and butter: they consider such Anglo-American assumptions to be primitive. Anglo-American taboos against porn have always been more repressive than other advanced societies. Activities like S & M are seen as perversions in Anglo countries, abroad they are just part of a normal sex life. Anglo-Americans are so sexually backward they don’t know how backward they are. Why else are there sites like this?
Also, your views are contradictory. If all women were sluts as you attest, sex would lose all its bargaining power. Yet you also maintain males are controlled by sex; yet, if women did not ration sex, this ‘control’ would be ineffective. And women DO ration sex, or try to: this is why the 60s Sexual Revolution died the proverbial death; why most women try to ban porn, prostitution, and so on. Only 2% of women are prostitutes in advanced industrial societies, hardly a universal lifestyle. Serious sexual research refutes your claims of female sexual profligacy in Anglo Saxon societies. It simply is not in their interest to lower the barter value of sex. If you go to a pleb youth slut bar, you’re just seeing less than 1% of the female population. Most women aren’t hot, young and sexy: less than 5% in fact.
Another thing: the reason why women can presently fleece men in the courts and so on, is this: feminism and its fallout have not been properly modulated in western societies yet. Women can fleece men because the law is still in a pre-feminist state, hearkening back to a time when women had little money and few rights: while the socio-economic reality of all that has changed. That’s why we have a men’s movement, to bring these things into line. Society is an unfinished work.
Also, do men do stuff merely to impress women? Women are generally more interested in gay serial killers on death row, not scientists or soldiers or politicians. Guys like Washington or Newton were hardly fighting off cunts with clubs, yet who could be more alpha than them? Also, most males in high positions are not true alphas anyway: they are just born into wealth and advantage. Birth class determines social status rather than genes in 90% of cases. This is why true alphas like Ghengis Khan cannot create lasting dynasties – their genetic legacy deteriorates with each successive generation, until only faux alphas remain, to be swept into the shit pan of history.
RE Muslims, even low status men enjoy much higher status than women in those societies. For example, any man’s testimony is worth more than a woman’s in an Islamic Court of law. It does not matter if the male is a farmhand and the female a Princess. Of course, here the opposite it true. And interestingly, a lot of Islamic terrorists are not plebs at all. Many come from good families and enjoy successful careers. Some are higher professionals. Why do they kill themselves? Your guess is as good as mine.
It seems our little JY is thinking again.
http://dir.salon.com/story/news/feature/2005/06/24/prostitutes/index.h tml
That’s enough of that.
Dick, please reply..what is the name of the song played in the background of the first video, Part 1: The Man Beginning ..it’s piano jazz, i adore piano jazz, who plays it?
You’re giving women way too much credit, the ones who go that route suffer more in the end. All the single mothers whining about not having help, all the celebs having mental breakdowns like Spears, in the end women are unintelligent and shortsighted. One way or another they live in a constant state of depression and self-hate. You can easily see it if you look. Due to their own incompetence, women are incapable of being truly happy. Even the men they do screw over will tell others how to avoid it. Soon, a immunity to women’s parasitism will develop and they will have no choice to act as they should.
And another thing, women do not act the way they do because men “let” them, they do so because they’re simply incapable of acting otherwise. Their own stupidity should be credited to them and them alone.
and lastly if you’re so sure that men are pussywhipped you could try changing it instead of complaining on the internet at people who know better already. Not only does it make you look like a whining pussywhipped man, it’s redundant
really? we are a puritan society? if this were true, men and women would remain virgins until marriage. how many virgins who aren’t married do you know? exactly. pussy is hardly the rare commodity you make it out to be. this might have been true decades ago (even then it is doubtful), but it is hardly true now. go to any club or bar and you will find legions of drunk sluts ready to give it up. even if have zero game, you can find an escort to satisfy your needs. the reason women act like cunts is because men let them get away with it. for every guy who listens to tom leykus, there are ten others who put the pussy on a pedestal.
as for muslim society, again i reiterate the point that most of the guys there are desperate to get laid. they live in sexually repressed and polygamous societies where a few alpha males do get lots of women and get to own them like property, while the rest of the beta males don’t get jack. its no wonder they’re so eager to kill themselves. most males aren’t alpha males, which has been my whole point. just like most men aren’t leaders, scientists, or what have you. a few elite men have dominance over women, but the majority don’t.
yeah exactly. think about that. men are the ones who do everything. they do the back breaking labor, while women just sit around and spend all their money, cheat on them, divorce them, and take everything. so who really is the winner in such a scenario? You say “that’s the only thing they have” as though it were a bad thing.
That’s like saying warren buffet is only good at picking stocks. That’s all he needs. A con artist is only good at exploiting the stupid. Why would he need to do anything else when he is amply rewarded by the stupid? Likewise, why does a woman need to do anything other than spread her legs when there are legions of guys willing to commit financial suicide in order to be with her? A tape worm has evolved to leech off other people’s digestion systems. It doesn’t “need” anything else. A woman has evolved to pussy whip guys for free. They don’t “need” to do anything else. Anything else is just icing on the cake. They can go out and be scientists, engineers, doctors and what not, but most don’t need to, given the sad state of men.
perhaps you guys need some better reading comprehension. who said i wasn’t misogynist? i just don’t make any pretense that men are better, especially given the state of the laws in america. if men are better, why is it that men have to pay child support for a kid that’s not even theirs if they dont contest paternity within a very short time period? ask yourself, who does this law benefit, and who does it screw over, and then ask yourself, how did it come to be passed.
No you just sound like a female as SOTS pointed out.
See you even take that as a attack or insult.
Ohhh of course it is insulting. Because you’re not a stupid female.
You just stepped into your very own misogynist world while trying to defend some pussy. Hope you get some from all your efforts, Ma’am.
No, I’m just a male amused at how deluded guys are into thinking they’re better than women, when pretty much the majority of guys are pussy whipped and owned by the various females in their lives, from their wife to their mistress to their hookers.
This is quite funny that you would say I am a female when you are engaging in typical female response of an ad hominem attack instead of being able to rationally or logically defend your point. Unable to use reason, something that men are good at, you lash out with emotion, something that women do. That’s quite sad.
It is an Anglo-Saxon phenomenon because Anglo-Saxon cultures are more repressed and puritanical (something Anglo women are keen to maintain) so sex has a higher ’scarcity value’ in Anglo cultures. This is why Anglo American women are such insufferable cunts. Outside the Anglosphere, women are far less entitled, as their main offering has less ‘value’.
RE Muslims, the heee-roes are served by lithe young boys in green robes and the virgins are 100 feet high. Hardly a conventional sexual model.
The girlfriend picked me up your book today!
M>W!
Wow a few mamma’s boys at the end of the last one. Oh well, keep being pussy whipped, fellas. That was a great listen. You will hear from me, Dick. Because I have some true shit to say and maybe I can think of something worthy of your mancellent replies.
That’s still cute. In the end men are still the ones doing everything, women are the ones so pathetic harming themselves to get men’s attention. Breasts implants, anal bleaching, pregnancy, all just to get a man’s attention. The only reason women are so good at using sex is because that’s the only thing they have. So, if that’s the kind of thinking they need to get over being a natural sex-toy, that’s fine.
Funny stuff… The women sounded like every ignorant woman I hear opening their mouths 100 times a day. But where did these dumbass men come from? Probably the losers in jail using their one phone call to impress their whore of a girlfriend hahaha.
Here is one :
Woman pilot (24 old hottie Maxi J, and no it’s really her name) almost kills everyone on board trying to land passenger jet, if not for cool man-thinking man Capitan Oliver that saved everyones life by grabbing controls from her then circles around and lands safely. The wing actually scrapped the runway! The passengers were quoted later that during the circle around and landing there was nothing but dead silence.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=usHuqPq7g5w
Apparently Lufthansa is in a habit certifying female pilots after 2 years of training. To think I used to fly this airline! I’m not kidding, I’ve read the translated German news site, they had a link to their air school for women!!!
One of the articles on the subject says “From what is currently known I see no one who is to blame,” – I beg to differ, the WOMAN is to blame for being a WOMAN that thinks she can do a MANs job, on top of that the airline is to blame for allowing woman to drive a complicated piece of machinery because they sold out everyones safety to feminatzi ideals. Lets be honest, how many woman can drive anything better than an average MAN… ZERO that’s how many.
Stay safe, avoid Luthansa like a plague, in fact ask before you fly anywhere who will be your captain, dyeing because feminist pipe dreams is weak
V.
…of course I was refering to the website posted by Billy earlier:
http://www.humbledfemales.com./basetenets.html
Billy, I’ve never seen this sentiment anywhere, but yet it describes the very qualities I’ve always sought from a woman. I also think many women deep inside know this too, and they playact nice, untill you put that wedding band on their finger.
BTW hilarious messages! I laughed hard, but I think it’s a loss of man points to actually listen to any message left by a woman (really what’s the point, it just feels like a waste of time in the end). Also since this is MEN only website fuck trying convincing any woman out there to what REAL MEN know already.
Can’t wait to read your book Dick
I also recommend “What Men Know That Women Don’tâ€? by Rich Zubaty
… and yes the book is NOT a lightweigh judging from the title…
V.
Get over what?
JY is a female.
and why are women capable of using sex to get ahead? because men are pathetic. men are always horny, always thinking with their dicks. the majority of men will have no problem letting women walk all over them, and would gladly do it. hence the raping in divorce courts. its so bad that even fat chicks can get laid. horny men just call them “thick”.
is it really just an anglo saxon phenom? Muslims are so horny they’d blow themselves up just to get 72 virgins. Just the mere thought of getting some action is enough to brainwash those idiots. Since the dawn of time men have been fighting wars, inventing stuff, doing this and that, to impress the woman. All the men’s greatest accomplishments were pretty much just to get laid. The woman’s greatest power is manipulating men. Men are physically stronger, yet women still control them with ease. Funny, that.
“I’m 24 and I have two kids”
Dear god almighty.
BAHAHWHAHW I love it! Genius.
http://encyclopediadramatica.com/Cheryl_Lindsey_Seelhoff
…anonymous! That’s good – right on my sadism; the vultures have been fed and the world has seen our might.
That prick at the end of the third video is really creepy. Think he was touching himself at all of those pervy messages he left. LOL.
JY’s post and Muzalon’s mantastic response have been archived for your reading gland.
salmonofdoubt.110mb.com/bigot.txt
@SoTS – Good response. I hope you get over yourself; I’d buy you a drink if I could.
JY that was the biggest drawn out piece of shit I’ve ever seen.
Report back when you find out how to let your skull rule your groin.
Ehehe, that’s a cute speech. But in the end that’s all women are capable of doing, using sex to get ahead. Men do not think of women as just sex objects they simply see women as they see themselves. Without a man to support her or for her to leach off of, a woman is simply nothing, and will waste away as such. They can enjoy it while they can because end the end women using sex to get around will only die sad and unhappy. In fact that’s the only reason women are as far ahead as they are now,not because men bent over backwards for them but because men felt pity for them. The minute that pity is gone, women like that will have no choice but to crawl back and beg for the chance to be useful again.
Why is the situation you describe a largely Anglo American phenomenon? Why does it not prevail in, say, Muslim countries?
what an interesting website here. men are better than women? really?
is that why women rape men for free in divorce court? is that why women can freely physically abuse their husband with no fear of repercussions, yet if the husband lifts a finger to defend himself he will likely be thrown in jail? is this why women can cheat on their husbands, yet still get the kids, the house, half her husband’s assets, and ailomony in divorce court? is this why strippers and hookers earn ridiculous amounts of money? is this why women can get drunk, sleep with a guy, then cry rape and despite a lack of evidence, will ruin the reputation and career of any man who cannot afford a good lawyer?
face it, women completely dominate men for free. men are driven by the desire for sex. they cant stop thinking about it. one of the articles here is: women hate sex. well, that’s certainly not true for guys. men cant stop thinking about it and will jump through ridiculous hoops just to get laid. men are logical about everything except women. women however, suffer no such weakness when it comes to the opposite sex. they know how to utterly destroy a guy – just offer to spread their legs. the smart ones get married and then they dont even need to spread.
american women are spoiled self entitled whores? perhaps, but who was it that empowered them to act in such a manner? that’s right, men. men who bent over backwards to please them in hopes of getting some.
the fact is the majority of men are inferior to women. this is why i find it funny when in a comment a man will talk about how males have accomplished this or that and then ask what have women done that is so great. YOU didnt accomplish any of that. a few elite men did, but what did you yourself accomplish? aside from the guy who runs this site, who brilliantly managed to gain fame and profit off of misogyny, i doubt most of you have anything to write home about.
now, i’ll stop playing devil’s advocate for now and just say this: women are human beings at the end of the day. they aren’t perfect and have flaws, but that holds true for men too. women are good for more than just sex. if men stopped thinking of women as just sex objects, then maybe they’d stop getting owned by them day in and day out.
About Sweden, I read that in the recent elections the people ignored the feminist party there as if even women are tiring of their crap.
Wow, the Manclusion proves what I had already known. The “man names” who post here calling us faggots and pencil dick virgins actually are males. There is actually a large portion of lead skulled men who will betray even themselves for access to overutilized vaginas.
Premptive strikes are requisite in times of war and no empires are built without breaking some eggs.
I love the elevator music in the background. It makes it even more funny. I cant wait to hear more…
I laughed, I laughed hard.
Manly. EPICALLY so.
Sweden is a stupid femenism country and everything have to be so fucking same for everyone. They do not understand here that men are 10 times smarter than women and most women honestly think they are smart.
Do not worry, I will soon move out from this evil country.
Heard that guy who was abusing Dick in the manclusion video? I bet there was a woman standing right behind him.. “abuse Dick or I won’t show you my pussy” That guy would have certainly got a gross pussy to lick at after he hung up.. I am saddened by the extent some guys go to please a pussy. I mean pussy is gross, why would you fall down to such a low level to please it?
There are still men left in Sweden? I thought the members of Amon Amarth were the last ones left.
My man-heart goes out to you men of Sweden. I’ve heard that your country has become a feminazi hell-hole.
Man, I have to give it to you: You are the best EVER!
I have bought your book and can not wait to get it in the mail!
I will do my best to share your message with everyone here in Sweden! Keep up with your amazing work and I hope you make a freaking fortune on the way!
Here is a few females who got something right!
http://www.humbledfemales.com./basetenets.html
If only they all were taught this.
Awesome… Rofl
Dick this weeks topic is never ending..
What exactly do women do well?
They cant even pop out babies without having someone else tell them when to breathe. I always thought that was kind of natural.
I got my schadenfreude fix.
What happened?
Epic win!!! Fucking EPIC!
I want more.
Keep it up.
Awesome. I definitely can’t wait for the next round of these calls.
ur a fag =]]
“Female anger is the weathervane of truth.” They prove it time and time again. Dick, you won’t have to write anymore. Just keep recording and posting the evidence on your site for the masses. Don’t stop writing though, that would suck.
I was able to listen to all three, but the 2nd two links on the page didnt work. I had to goto mabtw’s account on youtube.
Noone who leaved a message seemed to know the difference between writing and man-writing! We dont bull sh*t through essays. We say our point and wait for some god damn criticisms.