Or to be more precise, remove any existing laws criminalizes prostitutes. Seriously, you’re playing right into the Matriarchal/feminist/UN agenda when you engage yourself with the prostitution industry. All feminism is based on sexual anarchism. There is scarcely a Matriarchal society in the planet that isn’t saturated with pornography, slut culture and prostitution. Cut out the sexual anarchism and you’ll find feminism/Matriarchy seizing up.
Becoming a user of prostitution is an anti-male feminist thing to do. Prostitution (or as women like to say “the sex industry”) is a female-operated business and one of the first things the UN does when it wants to feminize a country is to make prosecution of prostitutes illegal.
I don’t think western women will like the laws of the sharia, women are digging their own grave and there will be no man left with enough sympathy for them to protect them against the results of their own liberation.
Really? What about the feminist War in Iraq? Plenty of men willing to go die to defend and extend feminist rule there.
I’m glad you see that I am 100 percent right about IQ. I am going to adopt a child as a single man and train him to be a fucking hollywood director from the age of 2. I can shape the boy, i’ll give you the man. No fucking nursing home for me!!!
Our civilization is now rotten in the core and the final strike will be given to the west by the islam. I don’t think western women will like the laws of the sharia, women are digging their own grave and there will be no man left with enough sympathy for them to protect them against the results of their own liberation. Maybe the laws of the sharia aren’t such a bad deal for men compared with contemporary female behaviour and family court. I don’t have sufficient knowledge about islamic culture to judge if the sharia will profit men, but i can imagine what will happen when a significant portion of western men convert to islam.
Yes, now that you mention those points I see that as well. can you give some examples of other civilizations that have treated women as equals that have been destroyed? (and not just the name of the civilization, what happened)
thanks
In no civilization have men and women ever been treated as equals; as a matter of fact, in all civilizations, women have been granted preferential treatment and special privileges, whereas men, especially those of the middle and lower classes, have always been discriminated against harshly and treated with great brutality. Thus, contrary to popular opinion, women were granted more privileges and a much higher status than the vast majority of men in such societies as Pharaonic Egypt, Ancient Rome, Han China, Japan under the shoguns, and the feudal kingdoms of the Middle Ages. In these cultures, the vast majority of men were bought and sold as slaves, coerced at the end of a sword to till the soil like serfs bound to the land forever. In what historical period have women ever been treated with such barbarism? After all, is woman not redeemed solely through the presence of her vagina?
It is under the aegis of contemporary Western society, that women are more privileged now than they have ever been throughout the history of the world. The notion of female oppression by males is an ideological fantasy concocted by Marxist historical revisionists; women have always been placed on pedestals and those men with the audacity to curtail female entitlement have always been subject to violent retaliation. Even in the polygamous culture of Islam, where most available young women are confined to lavish harems of concubines and beautiful odalisques, women have always been granted a higher status than men, given the fact that none ever have to work, pay taxes or fight wars. However, in Islam, female entitlement never reaches the same bizarre extreme as it does in the West.
The only difference between the contemporary West and previous civilizations is that the West has granted women so many privileges as to subvert the current patriarchal basis of civilization. Because all civilizations are founded and held together on the basis of male strength and intelligence, the elevation of the human female to such dizzying heights of power and wealth can only undermine the very fabric of Western society and ensure a civilizational collapse of the modern West more spectacular than that of the Roman Empire during late classical antiquity.
One very direct cause of cultural decline is the natural female preference for low IQ thugs and morons as sexual partners. Not only is this costly to society, putting unhelpful demands on the economy when the titular fathers abscond; it also has a dysgenic effect, causing the average IQ to fall in formerly healthy populations.
Under patriarchy, female choice counts for nothing, and the finest males tend to spread their genes, keeping the population at a respectable level in terms of IQ, social acumen and mental stability. When patriarchy crumbles, female choice (always in favour of the workshy,stupid and sociopathic) becomes a central factor in determining the genetic decline of the population. This is why and how matriarchy kills civilizations.
Muzalon or whatever the fuck your name is…. read a book called ‘the mismeasure of man’…. I think you are a eugenicist fuckhead… the wide baseless assertions you attribute to simply ‘genes’ are misguided in the utmost.
What creates low IQ is letting a fucking dvd player raise your children. Any child who is homeschooled by a father who has retired early or is self employed and has the time and vigor to dedicate hours a day to the child, will ace any IQ test.
You eugenic fucks are the ones that need to be wiped off the map and rolled into the fucking sea, simply because you cheapen every newborn baby with your baseless assumptions.
Learn motherfucker.
Oh, man, did you pull my string! I can’t say I agree with you 100% but I can say I certainly mostly agree with you. In fact, I could write a book on that topic.
You don’t have to spend hours a day with a kid to boost their i.q. More is better, but after work/school, normal interacting with your kids in a rational way is adequate to the task.
First example: My second wife was a type I unwed mother. (Type I was stupid; type II involves serial immorality.) I do not advise anyone marry an unwed mother. I was apparently blessed by God. My stepdaughter is simply put the best thing that ever happened to me in my life. Not my wife.
I have heard other men have had the same experience, but I have never personally met one. DON’T DO IT!!!!! Every other man I knew, and I counseled more than 1,600 divorced man, who took a step-child would have been better off to aim a double barreled shotgun at both knees and pull the triggers.
She told me as a young adult if I hadn’t become her dad, she probably would have run away from home — and probably ended up being one of X’s hookers to beat up?
Anyway, when her mom and I married, she was 7, and the teacher was recommending her for special ed classes. If I hadn’t come along, you can be sure her future as a Hispanic minority in special ed was bleak.
After I was there, she went up two years every year on Skill testing. She now has a Master’s Degree in Science Ed. and is working on another Master’s.
Am I a conceited jackass who thinks he is responsible for the difference? Absolutely! Eugenics f*****s would have labeled her as low i.q.and talked about dragging down the i.q. of society. With the proper dad (let me repeat, dad) she has done relatively well with herself.
My eldest son is a math research professor; the second is at least temporarily in med school, starting his last year. They are both Hispanic minorities. My ancestors were all manual laborers or dirt farmers.
My latest example is the half-grandson of my best friend. He is 8 months old, and within a few hours he jumps at me when he sees me.
Has anyone seen a woman trying to calm a fussy baby? The woman usually rocks him up and down. This kid was doing that and his mom was trying to rock him to calm him. I took him, and started exploring, I call it, just as I did with my own kids. I took him to the window and started talking to him in English, about the trees blowing in the wind, and the truck driving by. For some reason he wasn’t fussy!
If a kid isn’t sick or teething, in most cases when a kid is fussy, he is bored sick. Give him to a man who understands kids, and not only will he (or she) quiet down but his i.q. starts climbing. Heh, heh.
When my son was a kid, they did a study that showed the less time a small kid spent with his mother, the better he did intellectually. Hee, hee. Men Are Better Than Women.
Dude, how do you go from talking about cuttin up women ala American Psycho, to some Anti-Semitic Stuff to 9/11 conspiracy theory stuff to Anti Homophobic stuff to an article about helping people survive a heart attack
got a lot on your mind …lol
Sounds much like the high i.q. folks I met in Mensa when I was an officer. Heh, heh.
I must say it is at least refreshing to see for the first time months and months, a mabtw comment thread has graduated beyond the stock standard ‘you’re gay…. you’re a cunt’ kind of shit.
Yeah, and on top of it I found out I can buy the M>W book easily in Germany too!
End of next week it´s here.
Dude you need to lay off on this Women hating shit. It´s like hating a dog for being a dog, just plain stupid.
Plus you always end up giving away your power to the thing you hate.
If you got issues then go beat up a sandbag or something.
Give up our power to that which we hate? I gotta’ think about that, at great length. I know the same folks who support all sorts of strange things say that (not to say you are in that category, just pointing out what I have seen.)
But, what I see as a former divorce counselor is men giving away their power to the thing they love.
So, I am not really sure I can buy that viewpoint. Maybe it’s one of those things that gets repeated enough that we start to believe it?
I suppose it’s possible that when someone lets their hatred dominate their life, it can screw them up. The guy who says he likes to beat up on hookers will sooner or later find himself with a knife in his back, or bullet in his forehead, or in lock-up.
But, I think modest amounts of hatred serve to keep us out of trouble.
Dude, how do you go from talking about cuttin up women ala American Psycho, to some Anti-Semitic Stuff to 9/11 conspiracy theory stuff to Anti Homophobic stuff to an article about helping people survive a heart attack
Let’s say it’s 6:15 p.m. and you’re driving home (alone of course), after a hard day on the job. You’re really tired, upset and frustrated. Suddenly you start experiencing severe pain in your chest that starts to radiate out into your arm and up into your jaw. You are only about five miles from the hospital nearest your home. Unfortunately you don’t know if you’ll be able to make it that far. What can you do? You’ve been trained in CPR but the guy that taught the course, didn’t tell you what to do if a heart attack happens to you.
Since many people are alone when they suffer a heart attack, this article seemed to be in order.
Without help, the person whose heart is beating properly and who begins to feel faint has only about 10 seconds left before losing consciousness.
However, these victims can help themselves by coughing repeatedly and very vigorously.
A deep breath should be taken before each cough, and the cough must be deep and prolonged, as when producing sputum from deep inside the chest.
A breath and a cough must be repeated about every two seconds without let up until help arrives, or until the heart is felt to be beating normally again.
Deep breaths get oxygen into the lungs and coughing movements squeeze the heart and keep the blood circulating.
The squeezing pressure on the heart also helps it regain normal rhythm. In this way, heart attack victims can get to a hospital.
Tell as many other people as possible about this, it could save their lives!
There are few spectacles quite as rivetting and pitiable as a revved-up public pursuing a false idea in the name of equality. One gets the sense that the snake has charmed the charmer. One of the Canadian Public’s pet snakes is the idea of homosexual rights, and “All shall be the same in this society,” is the tune that charms.
I would argue, rather, that unless we maintain our historical distinction between individual rights, and social rights, there will be no society left. Every citizen of Canada, including all homosexuals, already has the same, exactly equal, individual rights (freedom of speech, right to trial, and so on). But not everyone has, nor ought to have, the same social rights. Simply being a citizen is sufficient to get all individual rights. But in a normal society, a citizen must qualify for specified social rights and benefits, and society has the prerogative of stipulating exactly how, rigorously excluding - that is, discriminating against - unqualified individuals.
For example, you cannot have a Canada Pension until you reach a certain age (unless you are an M.P. - then age doesn’t matter!). Nor can you have Social Assistance unless you demonstrate difficult circumstances. Nor can you qualify for veteran payments unless you have fought for Canada in a war. Nor are you a legal adult until a specified age. AND, most importantly - you can’t have the legal or tax benefits of a spouse unless you marry someone of the opposite sex.
But increasingly, people are believing the egalitarian idea that qualification for social rights is unnecessary. Increasingly, we have been subjected to a damnable new Charter argument designed to get social rights for homosexuals.
Most people have insisted the Charter should only protect against discrimination based on immutable characteristics such as colour, ethnicity, and gender, but never behaviour. But the new argument says: How about religion? Religion is protected, and that’s not immutable! Unfair!
But there is an unbridgeable gap between these two.
For starters, religion underpins Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Preamble of which specifically states: “Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God.” Homosexuality is not mentioned as a principle upon which Canada is founded (yet). A Charter would be Orwellian if it did not protect from discrimination those who believe in its own founding principle.
Religion is universal. It infuses all societies, and directly or indirectly shapes their collective identity. But homosexuality is the opposite. It is a widely spurned behaviour, even a counter-identity, practiced by only 1.5 to 2 per cent of the population in most nations.
Religion, though fallible like all things human, at least promotes moral behaviour through the worship of God, the highest Good. Homosexuality is the opposite. If not outlawed by most countries, it is deemed morally wrong, or sinful, by overwhelming majorities of normal people - even by those who defend the legal right to practice it privately. Charters and human rights codes should not be used to protect behaviours universally deemed bad.
Religion promotes procreation, is supportive of society, traditional family, and the continuation of both. Homosexuality is the opposite. Two homosexuals cannot procreate with each other. A fully homosexual society would self-destruct. Charters should protect procreation and pass over in silence other choices made by free individuals.
Religion is healthy, too. Societies that stress sincere religious beliefs tend to be the lowest in sociopathology, alcohol abuse, and crime. Homosexuality is the opposite. It is unhealthy, even dangerous behaviour. Homosexuals die younger, and have vastly more social, psychological, sexual, alcohol/drug problems than any other group. About 85% of all AIDS deaths in Canada and the U.S.A. are male homosexuals.
Religion is culturally inherited. The vast majority of the world’s children are inducted into their religion before adulthood, and never change. In this sense, religion is in theory mutable, but in practice is only quasi-mutable.
Homosexuality is the opposite. No one, no parent, no community leader, no one except another (usually older) homosexual, would ever voluntarily induct a child into homosexuality. About half of all homosexuals themselves even say they would “become upset” if a child of theirs became homosexual (Bell and Weinberg). And in no sense is homosexual behaviour immutable, as is skin colour, or ethnicity. Respected sexologists Masters and Johnson have repeatedly shown recovery rates of 70 per cent for homosexuals.
Religion is necessarily based on spiritual belief, but not necessarily on behaviour. Homosexuality is the opposite. No beliefs are required. What is required to identify and define homosexuality, is an act. Without homosexual behaviour, there is no homosexuality to worry about, and this fact alone is sufficient grounds to deny protection.
Charters should not protect or promote the mere appetites or behaviours of any individual or group.
I think it is time for the obligatory ZOG planned 9/11 and mind controlled bush with antidepressants and made him mesmerized reading a children’s book on the morning of 9/11… and metal doesn’t melt in the history of man…. and listen to alex jones he is so right…. and watch loose change…. and visit meatholes.com
SMash said:
Ich bin der fuhrer von Deutschland! Sig Heil! Jude NEIN!!!!!!!
I personally prefer the words of the megalomaniacal Aguirre, as portrayed by Klaus Kinski, in the movie of the same name:
“Ich bin der Zorn Gottes!”
Much darker and more sinister, don’t you think? Anyway, the Jews, provided that they are all of the male gender, are a friendly and intelligent people who have contributed enormously to both the scientific and material progress of civilization; what these men have suffered throughout history was a tragedy of immense proportions.
However, I do agree that the Protocols of the Elders of Zion was probably penned by a Jewess and that the world would be a much better place if all of our Jüdische Frauen were stuffed into the ovens of Auschwitz and roasted alive.
Beating up a whore is just like beating sandbag. No one knows about it. I leave the place and I’m fucking out of there. It’s fine. Don’t worry about me. Bitch patches her cunt up… goes to the ER…. its like American Psycho…. with the coathanger.
I’m impressed to see Dicko’s bx is 4 sale in the reich… that’s impressive… has it been translated to spreche deutsche?
Ich bin der fuhrer von Deutschland! Sig Heil! Jude NEIN!!!!!!!
I must say it is at least refreshing to see for the first time months and months, a mabtw comment thread has graduated beyond the stock standard ‘you’re gay…. you’re a cunt’ kind of shit.
Yeah, and on top of it I found out I can buy the M>W book easily in Germany too!
End of next week it´s here.
Dude you need to lay off on this Women hating shit. It´s like hating a dog for being a dog, just plain stupid.
Plus you always end up giving away your power to the thing you hate.
If you got issues then go beat up a sandbag or something.
I must say it is at least refreshing to see for the first time months and months, a mabtw comment thread has graduated beyond the stock standard ‘you’re gay…. you’re a cunt’ kind of shit.
I enjoy frequenting prostitutes…. I really fucking do. I very much love to economically rape and pillage these cunts’ bodies and minds. It is payback for what their ’sisters’ have done to my society. I spit in bitches’ faces.
Our civilization is now rotten in the core and the final strike will be given to the west by the islam. I don’t think western women will like the laws of the sharia, women are digging their own grave and there will be no man left with enough sympathy for them to protect them against the results of their own liberation. Maybe the laws of the sharia aren’t such a bad deal for men compared with contemporary female behaviour and family court. I don’t have sufficient knowledge about islamic culture to judge if the sharia will profit men, but i can imagine what will happen when a significant portion of western men convert to islam.
Yes, now that you mention those points I see that as well. can you give some examples of other civilizations that have treated women as equals that have been destroyed? (and not just the name of the civilization, what happened)
thanks
In no civilization have men and women ever been treated as equals; as a matter of fact, in all civilizations, women have been granted preferential treatment and special privileges, whereas men, especially those of the middle and lower classes, have always been discriminated against harshly and treated with great brutality. Thus, contrary to popular opinion, women were granted more privileges and a much higher status than the vast majority of men in such societies as Pharaonic Egypt, Ancient Rome, Han China, Japan under the shoguns, and the feudal kingdoms of the Middle Ages. In these cultures, the vast majority of men were bought and sold as slaves, coerced at the end of a sword to till the soil like serfs bound to the land forever. In what historical period have women ever been treated with such barbarism? After all, is woman not redeemed solely through the presence of her vagina?
It is under the aegis of contemporary Western society, that women are more privileged now than they have ever been throughout the history of the world. The notion of female oppression by males is an ideological fantasy concocted by Marxist historical revisionists; women have always been placed on pedestals and those men with the audacity to curtail female entitlement have always been subject to violent retaliation. Even in the polygamous culture of Islam, where most available young women are confined to lavish harems of concubines and beautiful odalisques, women have always been granted a higher status than men, given the fact that none ever have to work, pay taxes or fight wars. However, in Islam, female entitlement never reaches the same bizarre extreme as it does in the West.
The only difference between the contemporary West and previous civilizations is that the West has granted women so many privileges as to subvert the current patriarchal basis of civilization. Because all civilizations are founded and held together on the basis of male strength and intelligence, the elevation of the human female to such dizzying heights of power and wealth can only undermine the very fabric of Western society and ensure a civilizational collapse of the modern West more spectacular than that of the Roman Empire during late classical antiquity.
One very direct cause of cultural decline is the natural female preference for low IQ thugs and morons as sexual partners. Not only is this costly to society, putting unhelpful demands on the economy when the titular fathers abscond; it also has a dysgenic effect, causing the average IQ to fall in formerly healthy populations.
Under patriarchy, female choice counts for nothing, and the finest males tend to spread their genes, keeping the population at a respectable level in terms of IQ, social acumen and mental stability. When patriarchy crumbles, female choice (always in favour of the workshy,stupid and sociopathic) becomes a central factor in determining the genetic decline of the population. This is why and how matriarchy kills civilizations.
Muzalon or whatever the fuck your name is…. read a book called ‘the mismeasure of man’…. I think you are a eugenicist fuckhead… the wide baseless assertions you attribute to simply ‘genes’ are misguided in the utmost.
What creates low IQ is letting a fucking dvd player raise your children. Any child who is homeschooled by a father who has retired early or is self employed and has the time and vigor to dedicate hours a day to the child, will ace any IQ test.
You eugenic fucks are the ones that need to be wiped off the map and rolled into the fucking sea, simply because you cheapen every newborn baby with your baseless assumptions.
It is alleged there is a book SEX AND CULTURE, by Unwin, 1934, which covers the subject of civilizations which rise and fall as female sexuality is controlled or not. And Unwin says in every civlization, of over 80 he studied, the first generation of women who had complete sexual freedom saw the end of their civilization.
The only copy I have found was listed for around $800 in UK.
wow just wow. On amazon there are 2 reviews of this books and I quote : “Of course I rate this book 5 stars. It is the most important book written since The Origin of Species. But since the facts it contains are not politically correct, it is doomed to obscurity.”
Yes, civilizations, in my limited study, just before the end believe they are stronger and better than ever. I am looking forward to getting time to read this book.
has anyone else realized how ridiculous every woman’s comment in when calling dick’s voicemail? it’s one thing to be a stupid whore and go ahead and call dick, its another to just say something that even lowers my respect for your sex
Yeah hopefully i will never be in that position, but he has 2 kids to her and the only thing he is worried about is his kids.
It’s downright disgusting how women use the kids to get back at their ex-husband / boyfriend. I’ve even heard women in an -office environment- ‘joking’ about how they can get whatever they want from their partners by threatening to take the kids away. Not only inappropriate but sick beyond belief. Vindictive shits is what they are.
A few years back, a relative of mine went through the divorce process after his wife cheated on him with some other guy (while he was working his ass off to provide for her and their two kids). This guy was one of the happiest people I knew because he thought he had it all; job, house, wife, kids he loved. That is, until he found out what was really going on. As soon as the question of who gets what came up, the monster he had married went into emotional manipulation overdrive and used the kids to get at him, telling them lies about him, threatening to take them away from him for good. He ended up wrapping his car around a tree.
This was one of the key events in my life that made me realise there is something very wrong with feminist analysis and prescription. The more I started to think about it, the more I realised how gynocentric and anti-male Western society has become, on so many levels. It’s beyond ridiculous. In the office where I currently work, comments that are derogatory of men are passed on a very regular basis, sometimes as a “joke” but often quite clearly hateful in intent. I have not heard a single anti-female comment. Everyone is too scared to speak their minds because they’ll get slapped with sexual harassment and then they’re fucked for life. Feminism is anti-free speech, anti-progress and anti-male. This is why I have to admire Dick for having the balls to do what he does.
“Isn’t it ironic that your name is Dick?”
No, there is nothing ironic about that.
“What was your name OVARIES and then you got it changed?”
There is nothing funny about that. At all. Women suck at being funny.
Irony and comedy: two things that women should stop pretending that they understand. I know women love to speak, or rather, babble, in cliches; but “isn’t it ironic that …” doesn’t work unless what you say next is ironic.
Idiots.
Yeah Sal, I think women get all bent out of shape about Dick and his website because they can’t even come close to making a website this hilarious and relevant. Shit, they can not even put together a simple joke with a set up and punch line.
You guys are clearly, ALL GAY.
One of the few retorts women have when they’re slapped in the face with truth and don’t have anything relevant to say in return.
It is alleged there is a book SEX AND CULTURE, by Unwin, 1934, which covers the subject of civilizations which rise and fall as female sexuality is controlled or not. And Unwin says in every civlization, of over 80 he studied, the first generation of women who had complete sexual freedom saw the end of their civilization.
The only copy I have found was listed for around $800 in UK.
wow just wow. On amazon there are 2 reviews of this books and I quote : “Of course I rate this book 5 stars. It is the most important book written since The Origin of Species. But since the facts it contains are not politically correct, it is doomed to obscurity.”
Our civilization is now rotten in the core and the final strike will be given to the west by the islam. I don’t think western women will like the laws of the sharia, women are digging their own grave and there will be no man left with enough sympathy for them to protect them against the results of their own liberation. Maybe the laws of the sharia aren’t such a bad deal for men compared with contemporary female behaviour and family court. I don’t have sufficient knowledge about islamic culture to judge if the sharia will profit men, but i can imagine what will happen when a significant portion of western men convert to islam.
Yes, now that you mention those points I see that as well. can you give some examples of other civilizations that have treated women as equals that have been destroyed? (and not just the name of the civilization, what happened)
thanks
In no civilization have men and women ever been treated as equals; as a matter of fact, in all civilizations, women have been granted preferential treatment and special privileges, whereas men, especially those of the middle and lower classes, have always been discriminated against harshly and treated with great brutality. Thus, contrary to popular opinion, women were granted more privileges and a much higher status than the vast majority of men in such societies as Pharaonic Egypt, Ancient Rome, Han China, Japan under the shoguns, and the feudal kingdoms of the Middle Ages. In these cultures, the vast majority of men were bought and sold as slaves, coerced at the end of a sword to till the soil like serfs bound to the land forever. In what historical period have women ever been treated with such barbarism? After all, is woman not redeemed solely through the presence of her vagina?
It is under the aegis of contemporary Western society, that women are more privileged now than they have ever been throughout the history of the world. The notion of female oppression by males is an ideological fantasy concocted by Marxist historical revisionists; women have always been placed on pedestals and those men with the audacity to curtail female entitlement have always been subject to violent retaliation. Even in the polygamous culture of Islam, where most available young women are confined to lavish harems of concubines and beautiful odalisques, women have always been granted a higher status than men, given the fact that none ever have to work, pay taxes or fight wars. However, in Islam, female entitlement never reaches the same bizarre extreme as it does in the West.
The only difference between the contemporary West and previous civilizations is that the West has granted women so many privileges as to subvert the current patriarchal basis of civilization. Because all civilizations are founded and held together on the basis of male strength and intelligence, the elevation of the human female to such dizzying heights of power and wealth can only undermine the very fabric of Western society and ensure a civilizational collapse of the modern West more spectacular than that of the Roman Empire during late classical antiquity.
One very direct cause of cultural decline is the natural female preference for low IQ thugs and morons as sexual partners. Not only is this costly to society, putting unhelpful demands on the economy when the titular fathers abscond; it also has a dysgenic effect, causing the average IQ to fall in formerly healthy populations.
Under patriarchy, female choice counts for nothing, and the finest males tend to spread their genes, keeping the population at a respectable level in terms of IQ, social acumen and mental stability. When patriarchy crumbles, female choice (always in favour of the workshy,stupid and sociopathic) becomes a central factor in determining the genetic decline of the population. This is why and how matriarchy kills civilizations.
The vast majority of western women have large labia and cliterises shaped like miniature penises. Keeping that in mind, is it any wonder that so many of the modern western women of today are rebelling against traditional femininity? Clearly, Sigmund Freud’s remarks on female psycho-sexual development are more relevant now than ever before.
if what you maintain is true, then you have managed to shock me to my very core.
but that construct does have a very strong inherent ‘rightness’ to it.
When your woman is also your very good moll, it is ALWAYS wiser to be the designated purse holder when she is in a restroom, e.g., or a fittingroom, etc.
Purses have been known, especially withing today’s very “pro-woman” society, to hold certains bits of pieces of VERY lethal items; only to be used for one’s self protection of course.
Multiple items are always best for mutual protection.
In an ever changing world, for the worse btw, in an unavoidable confrontation with hostiles, I want to ‘do unto’, before anything is ‘done unto’ the wife-unit or myself or the bothof us.
Misterjos, I was enthused to find your link. I had been looking for some time.
I downloaded it ASAP. Any idea how they intended to use that file? I simply opened the PDF file in one of the folders with Acrobat Reader in Linux, but there are several formats, and some XML files, so I assume it is intended to be used in some clever way. There are also Word and Text versions.
Our civilization is now rotten in the core and the final strike will be given to the west by the islam. I don’t think western women will like the laws of the sharia, women are digging their own grave and there will be no man left with enough sympathy for them to protect them against the results of their own liberation. Maybe the laws of the sharia aren’t such a bad deal for men compared with contemporary female behaviour and family court. I don’t have sufficient knowledge about islamic culture to judge if the sharia will profit men, but i can imagine what will happen when a significant portion of western men convert to islam.
Yes, now that you mention those points I see that as well. can you give some examples of other civilizations that have treated women as equals that have been destroyed? (and not just the name of the civilization, what happened)
thanks
Heh, you ask me a question worth writing a book about, so there is no way i’ll be able to provide you with a satisfying answer. However, i’ll give you one example with reference in pdf and a book in pdf (see at the bottom). Note that, as a previous poster also pointed out, men and women were never equal, men granted women rights.
Case Sparta:
The men in sparta were specialized as soldiers, and after conquering a great agricultural region they were needed to keep the slaves working. Now as soldiers they didn’t have much spare time so they granted their women rights to own land and do management tasks. But as the women were employed they didn’t have as much time for children as they used to have, so birth rate fell and the strong soldiers were not replaced, the result was an invasion of an other culture and the end of the women’s rights.
Read the complete essay here: http://www.colby.edu/economics/seminar/SSRN-id788106.pdf.
It is alleged there is a book SEX AND CULTURE, by Unwin, 1934, which covers the subject of civilizations which rise and fall as female sexuality is controlled or not. And Unwin says in every civlization, of over 80 he studied, the first generation of women who had complete sexual freedom saw the end of their civilization.
The only copy I have found was listed for around $800 in UK.
It is alleged there is a book SEX AND CULTURE, by Unwin, 1934, which covers the subject of civilizations which rise and fall as female sexuality is controlled or not. And Unwin says in every civlization, of over 80 he studied, the first generation of women who had complete sexual freedom saw the end of their civilization.
The only copy I have found was listed for around $800 in UK.
Much cheaper is Prof Daniel Amneus’ The Garbage Generation. In that text, he shows that the only social level associated with matriarchy is the Stone Age.
We live in a Post-feminist era, wherein feminists cannot engage intellectually with their opponents without fear of defeat. What does that say about feminism? Where are the feminist scholars who claim to refute us? Why is female criticism of conceptual misogyny always at the crass level of the personal attack? Why do you not come forth to fight like Amazon queens under the walls of Troy?
It is alleged there is a book SEX AND CULTURE, by Unwin, 1934, which covers the subject of civilizations which rise and fall as female sexuality is controlled or not. And Unwin says in every civlization, of over 80 he studied, the first generation of women who had complete sexual freedom saw the end of their civilization.
The only copy I have found was listed for around $800 in UK.
Our civilization is now rotten in the core and the final strike will be given to the west by the islam. I don’t think western women will like the laws of the sharia, women are digging their own grave and there will be no man left with enough sympathy for them to protect them against the results of their own liberation. Maybe the laws of the sharia aren’t such a bad deal for men compared with contemporary female behaviour and family court. I don’t have sufficient knowledge about islamic culture to judge if the sharia will profit men, but i can imagine what will happen when a significant portion of western men convert to islam.
Yes, now that you mention those points I see that as well. can you give some examples of other civilizations that have treated women as equals that have been destroyed? (and not just the name of the civilization, what happened)
thanks
In no civilization have men and women ever been treated as equals; as a matter of fact, in all civilizations, women have been granted preferential treatment and special privileges, whereas men, especially those of the middle and lower classes, have always been discriminated against harshly and treated with great brutality. Thus, contrary to popular opinion, women were granted more privileges and a much higher status than the vast majority of men in such societies as Pharaonic Egypt, Ancient Rome, Han China, Japan under the shoguns, and the feudal kingdoms of the Middle Ages. In these cultures, the vast majority of men were bought and sold as slaves, coerced at the end of a sword to till the soil like serfs bound to the land forever. In what historical period have women ever been treated with such barbarism? After all, is woman not redeemed solely through the presence of her vagina?
It is under the aegis of contemporary Western society, that women are more privileged now than they have ever been throughout the history of the world. The notion of female oppression by males is an ideological fantasy concocted by Marxist historical revisionists; women have always been placed on pedestals and those men with the audacity to curtail female entitlement have always been subject to violent retaliation. Even in the polygamous culture of Islam, where most available young women are confined to lavish harems of concubines and beautiful odalisques, women have always been granted a higher status than men, given the fact that none ever have to work, pay taxes or fight wars. However, in Islam, female entitlement never reaches the same bizarre extreme as it does in the West.
The only difference between the contemporary West and previous civilizations is that the West has granted women so many privileges as to subvert the current patriarchal basis of civilization. Because all civilizations are founded and held together on the basis of male strength and intelligence, the elevation of the human female to such dizzying heights of power and wealth can only undermine the very fabric of Western society and ensure a civilizational collapse of the modern West more spectacular than that of the Roman Empire during late classical antiquity.
“Isn’t it ironic that your name is Dick?”
No, there is nothing ironic about that.
“What was your name OVARIES and then you got it changed?”
There is nothing funny about that. At all. Women suck at being funny.
Irony and comedy: two things that women should stop pretending that they understand. I know women love to speak, or rather, babble, in cliches; but “isn’t it ironic that …” doesn’t work unless what you say next is ironic.
Idiots.
Yeah Sal, I think women get all bent out of shape about Dick and his website because they can’t even come close to making a website this hilarious and relevant. Shit, they can not even put together a simple joke with a set up and punch line.
Our civilization is now rotten in the core and the final strike will be given to the west by the islam. I don’t think western women will like the laws of the sharia, women are digging their own grave and there will be no man left with enough sympathy for them to protect them against the results of their own liberation. Maybe the laws of the sharia aren’t such a bad deal for men compared with contemporary female behaviour and family court. I don’t have sufficient knowledge about islamic culture to judge if the sharia will profit men, but i can imagine what will happen when a significant portion of western men convert to islam.
Yes, now that you mention those points I see that as well. can you give some examples of other civilizations that have treated women as equals that have been destroyed? (and not just the name of the civilization, what happened)
I think it all has to how much EVERYTHING has become feminin. Everywhere you look you see foot in a high heel. As much as I love high heels on women, Id much rather see them upside down. This saturation of feminity is programming our men to become more like women and to lower their masculinity at the same time (If i hear another: “Yes dear, I’ll hold your purse” one more time…need to start deprogramming these men.)
I love women and we need Sun Tzu’s Art of War on Women to survive a) their games b) their manipulation and c) the movement to feminity here in North America.
WHAT WE NEED IS MORE MASCULIN RIGHTS OF PASSAGE…More creation, more innovation, more power!
Cheers.
I partly disagree, feminism wasn’t ever and isn’t about femininity, it is a movement of women wanting to be masculine, and at the same time prohibiting the masculinity in men and instilling them with feminine behaviour. The result is women who aren’t feminine nor masculine, and men who are not masculine nor feminine, both are unhappy unnatural disgusting creatures deemed to die off.
Nowadays the socialist state is the great provider and alpha male surrogate, so women (and also the state) treat all the men like sub-beta males. Still people seem to be desperate for that wet hole no matter how women treat them. This sort of behaviour is the result of a trick nature has build into men to secure the propagation of the species, and women know how to abuse this trick to get what they want. The problem is that feminists aren’t worth propagating, and propagating them is a sure weapon of mass destruction against our western civilization. Every past civilization where men gave equal rights to women was destructed from within, and eventually from without. Our civilization is now rotten in the core and the final strike will be given to the west by the islam. I don’t think western women will like the laws of the sharia, women are digging their own grave and there will be no man left with enough sympathy for them to protect them against the results of their own liberation. Maybe the laws of the sharia aren’t such a bad deal for men compared with contemporary female behaviour and family court. I don’t have sufficient knowledge about islamic culture to judge if the sharia will profit men, but i can imagine what will happen when a significant portion of western men convert to islam.
I think women aren’t born this way. They have the ability to think clearly (read Ester Vilar’s: The Manipulated Man - she was sent death threats based on the truths she told) but something gets lost along the way.
I think Ester Vilar was just trying to persuade men to open up the job market to women by suggesting that it was for their own good. The irony is that Vilar’s book is in itself an exercise in manipulation.
Men don’t mind working for their wives, as long as they get love and respect in return. Today men still have to work, and sometimes do the chores in the home as well, and there’s no guarantee they get much in return for that. Many men even work to support a family they’re not part of anymore.
I think women aren’t born this way. They have the ability to think clearly (read Ester Vilar’s: The Manipulated Man
Cheers.
EXACTY, women know exactly what htey are doing, but saying that they are “naturally” this way, does 2 things; They say to man that nothing can be changed, cos you can not change the nature of things, also it gives them redemption - oh we are already this way God created us this way, so we do nothing wrong, we are women so we have the right to do that, in fact we need more rights.
This way one could “explain” everything for ex; a serial murderer is also a God’s creature, give that someone more rights and opportunities to murder people.
In human history women always tried to be this way, but they did not have the opportunity. Knowing that men called them Devil’s creatures. So that’s where the story of Adam and Eve comes form. But in last decades we men thaught when we give women rights they will use it for the right cause, that thay will become competent. And what they are doing they are abusing the credit we gave them. Long soty short what women managed to do for the last decades is they have created a social pathology which size is killing all humanity.
I think women aren’t born this way. They have the ability to think clearly (read Ester Vilar’s: The Manipulated Man - she was sent death threats based on the truths she told) but something gets lost along the way.
Maybe its the environment, maybe its peer pressure, maybe its our society and how shockingly tolerant we are about 2nd - rate behaviour from women and maybe its our society putting them on a pedastal where they don’t belong (NO WHERE in History has a woman been on a pedestal - except for Cleopatra or Boadicea, barbarian Queen of the Iceni, statue in london)
I seriously doubt its genetic (mostly an excuse). One example…Some cultures in the world don’t experience Menopausal symptoms. Whereas the women here go to psychics and crystal healers because they are a little hot. Eternally lamenting about their psychologically manifested symptoms.
I’ve also seen men behave as stupid as women. THey can’t talk clearly or formulate a directed thought. It comes out as passive aggressive filler that women are famous for.
I think it all has to how much EVERYTHING has become feminin. Everywhere you look you see foot in a high heel. As much as I love high heels on women, Id much rather see them upside down. This saturation of feminity is programming our men to become more like women and to lower their masculinity at the same time (If i hear another: “Yes dear, I’ll hold your purse” one more time…need to start deprogramming these men.)
I love women and we need Sun Tzu’s Art of War on Women to survive a) their games b) their manipulation and c) the movement to feminity here in North America.
WHAT WE NEED IS MORE MASCULIN RIGHTS OF PASSAGE…More creation, more innovation, more power!
The vast majority of western women have large labia and cliterises shaped like miniature penises. Keeping that in mind, is it any wonder that so many of the modern western women of today are rebelling against traditional femininity? Clearly, Sigmund Freud’s remarks on female psycho-sexual development are more relevant now than ever before.
Or to be more precise, remove any existing laws criminalizes prostitutes. Seriously, you’re playing right into the Matriarchal/feminist/UN agenda when you engage yourself with the prostitution industry. All feminism is based on sexual anarchism. There is scarcely a Matriarchal society in the planet that isn’t saturated with pornography, slut culture and prostitution. Cut out the sexual anarchism and you’ll find feminism/Matriarchy seizing up.
Becoming a user of prostitution is an anti-male feminist thing to do. Prostitution (or as women like to say “the sex industry”) is a female-operated business and one of the first things the UN does when it wants to feminize a country is to make prosecution of prostitutes illegal.
I don’t think western women will like the laws of the sharia, women are digging their own grave and there will be no man left with enough sympathy for them to protect them against the results of their own liberation.
Really? What about the feminist War in Iraq? Plenty of men willing to go die to defend and extend feminist rule there.
And I am not going to tolerate any one of you dribbling clap cock assholes saying the above was a ‘homophopic rant’…. It wasn’t.
PHOBOS = FEAR
THERE. IS. A. BIG. DIFFERENCE. BETWEEN. FEAR. AND. DISGUST.
Homosexuals are the ultimate product of womens’ fuck ups as mothers.
I’m glad you see that I am 100 percent right about IQ. I am going to adopt a child as a single man and train him to be a fucking hollywood director from the age of 2. I can shape the boy, i’ll give you the man. No fucking nursing home for me!!!
I only use legal brothels by the way. There is no violence but my violence there…. so I am fully safe so don’t worry about me.
Oh, man, did you pull my string! I can’t say I agree with you 100% but I can say I certainly mostly agree with you. In fact, I could write a book on that topic.
You don’t have to spend hours a day with a kid to boost their i.q. More is better, but after work/school, normal interacting with your kids in a rational way is adequate to the task.
First example: My second wife was a type I unwed mother. (Type I was stupid; type II involves serial immorality.) I do not advise anyone marry an unwed mother. I was apparently blessed by God. My stepdaughter is simply put the best thing that ever happened to me in my life. Not my wife.
I have heard other men have had the same experience, but I have never personally met one. DON’T DO IT!!!!! Every other man I knew, and I counseled more than 1,600 divorced man, who took a step-child would have been better off to aim a double barreled shotgun at both knees and pull the triggers.
She told me as a young adult if I hadn’t become her dad, she probably would have run away from home — and probably ended up being one of X’s hookers to beat up?
Anyway, when her mom and I married, she was 7, and the teacher was recommending her for special ed classes. If I hadn’t come along, you can be sure her future as a Hispanic minority in special ed was bleak.
After I was there, she went up two years every year on Skill testing. She now has a Master’s Degree in Science Ed. and is working on another Master’s.
Am I a conceited jackass who thinks he is responsible for the difference? Absolutely! Eugenics f*****s would have labeled her as low i.q.and talked about dragging down the i.q. of society. With the proper dad (let me repeat, dad) she has done relatively well with herself.
My eldest son is a math research professor; the second is at least temporarily in med school, starting his last year. They are both Hispanic minorities. My ancestors were all manual laborers or dirt farmers.
My latest example is the half-grandson of my best friend. He is 8 months old, and within a few hours he jumps at me when he sees me.
Has anyone seen a woman trying to calm a fussy baby? The woman usually rocks him up and down. This kid was doing that and his mom was trying to rock him to calm him. I took him, and started exploring, I call it, just as I did with my own kids. I took him to the window and started talking to him in English, about the trees blowing in the wind, and the truck driving by. For some reason he wasn’t fussy!
If a kid isn’t sick or teething, in most cases when a kid is fussy, he is bored sick. Give him to a man who understands kids, and not only will he (or she) quiet down but his i.q. starts climbing. Heh, heh.
When my son was a kid, they did a study that showed the less time a small kid spent with his mother, the better he did intellectually. Hee, hee. Men Are Better Than Women.
Sounds much like the high i.q. folks I met in Mensa when I was an officer. Heh, heh.
Give up our power to that which we hate? I gotta’ think about that, at great length. I know the same folks who support all sorts of strange things say that (not to say you are in that category, just pointing out what I have seen.)
But, what I see as a former divorce counselor is men giving away their power to the thing they love.
So, I am not really sure I can buy that viewpoint. Maybe it’s one of those things that gets repeated enough that we start to believe it?
I suppose it’s possible that when someone lets their hatred dominate their life, it can screw them up. The guy who says he likes to beat up on hookers will sooner or later find himself with a knife in his back, or bullet in his forehead, or in lock-up.
But, I think modest amounts of hatred serve to keep us out of trouble.
Like I said, I gotta’ think about this at length.
HOW TO SURVIVE A HEART ATTACK WHEN ALONE
Read This - It could save your life!
Let’s say it’s 6:15 p.m. and you’re driving home (alone of course), after a hard day on the job. You’re really tired, upset and frustrated. Suddenly you start experiencing severe pain in your chest that starts to radiate out into your arm and up into your jaw. You are only about five miles from the hospital nearest your home. Unfortunately you don’t know if you’ll be able to make it that far. What can you do? You’ve been trained in CPR but the guy that taught the course, didn’t tell you what to do if a heart attack happens to you.
Since many people are alone when they suffer a heart attack, this article seemed to be in order.
Without help, the person whose heart is beating properly and who begins to feel faint has only about 10 seconds left before losing consciousness.
However, these victims can help themselves by coughing repeatedly and very vigorously.
A deep breath should be taken before each cough, and the cough must be deep and prolonged, as when producing sputum from deep inside the chest.
A breath and a cough must be repeated about every two seconds without let up until help arrives, or until the heart is felt to be beating normally again.
Deep breaths get oxygen into the lungs and coughing movements squeeze the heart and keep the blood circulating.
The squeezing pressure on the heart also helps it regain normal rhythm. In this way, heart attack victims can get to a hospital.
Tell as many other people as possible about this, it could save their lives!
There are few spectacles quite as rivetting and pitiable as a revved-up public pursuing a false idea in the name of equality. One gets the sense that the snake has charmed the charmer. One of the Canadian Public’s pet snakes is the idea of homosexual rights, and “All shall be the same in this society,” is the tune that charms.
I would argue, rather, that unless we maintain our historical distinction between individual rights, and social rights, there will be no society left. Every citizen of Canada, including all homosexuals, already has the same, exactly equal, individual rights (freedom of speech, right to trial, and so on). But not everyone has, nor ought to have, the same social rights. Simply being a citizen is sufficient to get all individual rights. But in a normal society, a citizen must qualify for specified social rights and benefits, and society has the prerogative of stipulating exactly how, rigorously excluding - that is, discriminating against - unqualified individuals.
For example, you cannot have a Canada Pension until you reach a certain age (unless you are an M.P. - then age doesn’t matter!). Nor can you have Social Assistance unless you demonstrate difficult circumstances. Nor can you qualify for veteran payments unless you have fought for Canada in a war. Nor are you a legal adult until a specified age. AND, most importantly - you can’t have the legal or tax benefits of a spouse unless you marry someone of the opposite sex.
But increasingly, people are believing the egalitarian idea that qualification for social rights is unnecessary. Increasingly, we have been subjected to a damnable new Charter argument designed to get social rights for homosexuals.
Most people have insisted the Charter should only protect against discrimination based on immutable characteristics such as colour, ethnicity, and gender, but never behaviour. But the new argument says: How about religion? Religion is protected, and that’s not immutable! Unfair!
But there is an unbridgeable gap between these two.
For starters, religion underpins Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the Preamble of which specifically states: “Canada is founded upon principles that recognize the supremacy of God.” Homosexuality is not mentioned as a principle upon which Canada is founded (yet). A Charter would be Orwellian if it did not protect from discrimination those who believe in its own founding principle.
Religion is universal. It infuses all societies, and directly or indirectly shapes their collective identity. But homosexuality is the opposite. It is a widely spurned behaviour, even a counter-identity, practiced by only 1.5 to 2 per cent of the population in most nations.
Religion, though fallible like all things human, at least promotes moral behaviour through the worship of God, the highest Good. Homosexuality is the opposite. If not outlawed by most countries, it is deemed morally wrong, or sinful, by overwhelming majorities of normal people - even by those who defend the legal right to practice it privately. Charters and human rights codes should not be used to protect behaviours universally deemed bad.
Religion promotes procreation, is supportive of society, traditional family, and the continuation of both. Homosexuality is the opposite. Two homosexuals cannot procreate with each other. A fully homosexual society would self-destruct. Charters should protect procreation and pass over in silence other choices made by free individuals.
Religion is healthy, too. Societies that stress sincere religious beliefs tend to be the lowest in sociopathology, alcohol abuse, and crime. Homosexuality is the opposite. It is unhealthy, even dangerous behaviour. Homosexuals die younger, and have vastly more social, psychological, sexual, alcohol/drug problems than any other group. About 85% of all AIDS deaths in Canada and the U.S.A. are male homosexuals.
Religion is culturally inherited. The vast majority of the world’s children are inducted into their religion before adulthood, and never change. In this sense, religion is in theory mutable, but in practice is only quasi-mutable.
Homosexuality is the opposite. No one, no parent, no community leader, no one except another (usually older) homosexual, would ever voluntarily induct a child into homosexuality. About half of all homosexuals themselves even say they would “become upset” if a child of theirs became homosexual (Bell and Weinberg). And in no sense is homosexual behaviour immutable, as is skin colour, or ethnicity. Respected sexologists Masters and Johnson have repeatedly shown recovery rates of 70 per cent for homosexuals.
Religion is necessarily based on spiritual belief, but not necessarily on behaviour. Homosexuality is the opposite. No beliefs are required. What is required to identify and define homosexuality, is an act. Without homosexual behaviour, there is no homosexuality to worry about, and this fact alone is sufficient grounds to deny protection.
Charters should not protect or promote the mere appetites or behaviours of any individual or group.
I think it is time for the obligatory ZOG planned 9/11 and mind controlled bush with antidepressants and made him mesmerized reading a children’s book on the morning of 9/11… and metal doesn’t melt in the history of man…. and listen to alex jones he is so right…. and watch loose change…. and visit meatholes.com
I personally prefer the words of the megalomaniacal Aguirre, as portrayed by Klaus Kinski, in the movie of the same name:
“Ich bin der Zorn Gottes!”
Much darker and more sinister, don’t you think? Anyway, the Jews, provided that they are all of the male gender, are a friendly and intelligent people who have contributed enormously to both the scientific and material progress of civilization; what these men have suffered throughout history was a tragedy of immense proportions.
However, I do agree that the Protocols of the Elders of Zion was probably penned by a Jewess and that the world would be a much better place if all of our Jüdische Frauen were stuffed into the ovens of Auschwitz and roasted alive.
Beating up a whore is just like beating sandbag. No one knows about it. I leave the place and I’m fucking out of there. It’s fine. Don’t worry about me. Bitch patches her cunt up… goes to the ER…. its like American Psycho…. with the coathanger.
I’m impressed to see Dicko’s bx is 4 sale in the reich… that’s impressive… has it been translated to spreche deutsche?
Ich bin der fuhrer von Deutschland! Sig Heil! Jude NEIN!!!!!!!
Yeah, and on top of it I found out I can buy the M>W book easily in Germany too!
End of next week it´s here.
Dude you need to lay off on this Women hating shit. It´s like hating a dog for being a dog, just plain stupid.
Plus you always end up giving away your power to the thing you hate.
If you got issues then go beat up a sandbag or something.
I must say it is at least refreshing to see for the first time months and months, a mabtw comment thread has graduated beyond the stock standard ‘you’re gay…. you’re a cunt’ kind of shit.
I enjoy frequenting prostitutes…. I really fucking do. I very much love to economically rape and pillage these cunts’ bodies and minds. It is payback for what their ’sisters’ have done to my society. I spit in bitches’ faces.
Muzalon or whatever the fuck your name is…. read a book called ‘the mismeasure of man’…. I think you are a eugenicist fuckhead… the wide baseless assertions you attribute to simply ‘genes’ are misguided in the utmost.
What creates low IQ is letting a fucking dvd player raise your children. Any child who is homeschooled by a father who has retired early or is self employed and has the time and vigor to dedicate hours a day to the child, will ace any IQ test.
You eugenic fucks are the ones that need to be wiped off the map and rolled into the fucking sea, simply because you cheapen every newborn baby with your baseless assumptions.
Learn motherfucker.
Yes, civilizations, in my limited study, just before the end believe they are stronger and better than ever. I am looking forward to getting time to read this book.
has anyone else realized how ridiculous every woman’s comment in when calling dick’s voicemail? it’s one thing to be a stupid whore and go ahead and call dick, its another to just say something that even lowers my respect for your sex
It’s downright disgusting how women use the kids to get back at their ex-husband / boyfriend. I’ve even heard women in an -office environment- ‘joking’ about how they can get whatever they want from their partners by threatening to take the kids away. Not only inappropriate but sick beyond belief. Vindictive shits is what they are.
A few years back, a relative of mine went through the divorce process after his wife cheated on him with some other guy (while he was working his ass off to provide for her and their two kids). This guy was one of the happiest people I knew because he thought he had it all; job, house, wife, kids he loved. That is, until he found out what was really going on. As soon as the question of who gets what came up, the monster he had married went into emotional manipulation overdrive and used the kids to get at him, telling them lies about him, threatening to take them away from him for good. He ended up wrapping his car around a tree.
This was one of the key events in my life that made me realise there is something very wrong with feminist analysis and prescription. The more I started to think about it, the more I realised how gynocentric and anti-male Western society has become, on so many levels. It’s beyond ridiculous. In the office where I currently work, comments that are derogatory of men are passed on a very regular basis, sometimes as a “joke” but often quite clearly hateful in intent. I have not heard a single anti-female comment. Everyone is too scared to speak their minds because they’ll get slapped with sexual harassment and then they’re fucked for life. Feminism is anti-free speech, anti-progress and anti-male. This is why I have to admire Dick for having the balls to do what he does.
One of the few retorts women have when they’re slapped in the face with truth and don’t have anything relevant to say in return.
wow just wow. On amazon there are 2 reviews of this books and I quote : “Of course I rate this book 5 stars. It is the most important book written since The Origin of Species. But since the facts it contains are not politically correct, it is doomed to obscurity.”
One very direct cause of cultural decline is the natural female preference for low IQ thugs and morons as sexual partners. Not only is this costly to society, putting unhelpful demands on the economy when the titular fathers abscond; it also has a dysgenic effect, causing the average IQ to fall in formerly healthy populations.
Under patriarchy, female choice counts for nothing, and the finest males tend to spread their genes, keeping the population at a respectable level in terms of IQ, social acumen and mental stability. When patriarchy crumbles, female choice (always in favour of the workshy,stupid and sociopathic) becomes a central factor in determining the genetic decline of the population. This is why and how matriarchy kills civilizations.
if what you maintain is true, then you have managed to shock me to my very core.
but that construct does have a very strong inherent ‘rightness’ to it.
thnaks for the thought provocation!
FT
When your woman is also your very good moll, it is ALWAYS wiser to be the designated purse holder when she is in a restroom, e.g., or a fittingroom, etc.
Purses have been known, especially withing today’s very “pro-woman” society, to hold certains bits of pieces of VERY lethal items; only to be used for one’s self protection of course.
Multiple items are always best for mutual protection.
In an ever changing world, for the worse btw, in an unavoidable confrontation with hostiles, I want to ‘do unto’, before anything is ‘done unto’ the wife-unit or myself or the bothof us.
Update. When unzipped, there will be five folders, each with the book in a different format. I chose PDF, but it also has html; mhtml; text, and word.
Misterjos, I was enthused to find your link. I had been looking for some time.
I downloaded it ASAP. Any idea how they intended to use that file? I simply opened the PDF file in one of the folders with Acrobat Reader in Linux, but there are several formats, and some XML files, so I assume it is intended to be used in some clever way. There are also Word and Text versions.
Heh, you ask me a question worth writing a book about, so there is no way i’ll be able to provide you with a satisfying answer. However, i’ll give you one example with reference in pdf and a book in pdf (see at the bottom). Note that, as a previous poster also pointed out, men and women were never equal, men granted women rights.
Case Sparta:
The men in sparta were specialized as soldiers, and after conquering a great agricultural region they were needed to keep the slaves working. Now as soldiers they didn’t have much spare time so they granted their women rights to own land and do management tasks. But as the women were employed they didn’t have as much time for children as they used to have, so birth rate fell and the strong soldiers were not replaced, the result was an invasion of an other culture and the end of the women’s rights.
Read the complete essay here: http://www.colby.edu/economics/seminar/SSRN-id788106.pdf.
Hey, i hope i can delight you and maybe others with the electronic form of this book, its available here: http://www.tenjune.com/SexCulture.zip.
BTW, men knew they were better than women for ages: http://www.theabsolute.net/minefield/mansup.pdf (1739), found on this website: http://www.menstribune.com/.
Yeah hopefully i will never be in that position, but he has 2 kids to her and the only thing he is worried about is his kids.
Some men just need to learn the hard way. Sad but true.
You should know.
lol, my mums gf said the same thing last night as her oldest son is going through a divorce and his x wants everything.
this site is the work of a repressed homo, no lie.
Much cheaper is Prof Daniel Amneus’ The Garbage Generation. In that text, he shows that the only social level associated with matriarchy is the Stone Age.
We live in a Post-feminist era, wherein feminists cannot engage intellectually with their opponents without fear of defeat. What does that say about feminism? Where are the feminist scholars who claim to refute us? Why is female criticism of conceptual misogyny always at the crass level of the personal attack? Why do you not come forth to fight like Amazon queens under the walls of Troy?
http://www.crosswalk.com/blogs/mCraven/11578863/
is a olog which discusses Unwin, and next week is going to expand on it.
Horsepussy guy you cracked me up.
“…moneyhungrybitches doing the jig…”
“… all this stupid shit that doesn’t happen…”
“… and its all for attention”
Just Golden Truth
It is alleged there is a book SEX AND CULTURE, by Unwin, 1934, which covers the subject of civilizations which rise and fall as female sexuality is controlled or not. And Unwin says in every civlization, of over 80 he studied, the first generation of women who had complete sexual freedom saw the end of their civilization.
The only copy I have found was listed for around $800 in UK.
In no civilization have men and women ever been treated as equals; as a matter of fact, in all civilizations, women have been granted preferential treatment and special privileges, whereas men, especially those of the middle and lower classes, have always been discriminated against harshly and treated with great brutality. Thus, contrary to popular opinion, women were granted more privileges and a much higher status than the vast majority of men in such societies as Pharaonic Egypt, Ancient Rome, Han China, Japan under the shoguns, and the feudal kingdoms of the Middle Ages. In these cultures, the vast majority of men were bought and sold as slaves, coerced at the end of a sword to till the soil like serfs bound to the land forever. In what historical period have women ever been treated with such barbarism? After all, is woman not redeemed solely through the presence of her vagina?
It is under the aegis of contemporary Western society, that women are more privileged now than they have ever been throughout the history of the world. The notion of female oppression by males is an ideological fantasy concocted by Marxist historical revisionists; women have always been placed on pedestals and those men with the audacity to curtail female entitlement have always been subject to violent retaliation. Even in the polygamous culture of Islam, where most available young women are confined to lavish harems of concubines and beautiful odalisques, women have always been granted a higher status than men, given the fact that none ever have to work, pay taxes or fight wars. However, in Islam, female entitlement never reaches the same bizarre extreme as it does in the West.
The only difference between the contemporary West and previous civilizations is that the West has granted women so many privileges as to subvert the current patriarchal basis of civilization. Because all civilizations are founded and held together on the basis of male strength and intelligence, the elevation of the human female to such dizzying heights of power and wealth can only undermine the very fabric of Western society and ensure a civilizational collapse of the modern West more spectacular than that of the Roman Empire during late classical antiquity.
You just shattered my fragile ego.
You guys are clearly, ALL GAY.
Yes, now that you mention those points I see that as well. can you give some examples of other civilizations that have treated women as equals that have been destroyed? (and not just the name of the civilization, what happened)
thanks
I partly disagree, feminism wasn’t ever and isn’t about femininity, it is a movement of women wanting to be masculine, and at the same time prohibiting the masculinity in men and instilling them with feminine behaviour. The result is women who aren’t feminine nor masculine, and men who are not masculine nor feminine, both are unhappy unnatural disgusting creatures deemed to die off.
Nowadays the socialist state is the great provider and alpha male surrogate, so women (and also the state) treat all the men like sub-beta males. Still people seem to be desperate for that wet hole no matter how women treat them. This sort of behaviour is the result of a trick nature has build into men to secure the propagation of the species, and women know how to abuse this trick to get what they want. The problem is that feminists aren’t worth propagating, and propagating them is a sure weapon of mass destruction against our western civilization. Every past civilization where men gave equal rights to women was destructed from within, and eventually from without. Our civilization is now rotten in the core and the final strike will be given to the west by the islam. I don’t think western women will like the laws of the sharia, women are digging their own grave and there will be no man left with enough sympathy for them to protect them against the results of their own liberation. Maybe the laws of the sharia aren’t such a bad deal for men compared with contemporary female behaviour and family court. I don’t have sufficient knowledge about islamic culture to judge if the sharia will profit men, but i can imagine what will happen when a significant portion of western men convert to islam.
I think Ester Vilar was just trying to persuade men to open up the job market to women by suggesting that it was for their own good. The irony is that Vilar’s book is in itself an exercise in manipulation.
Men don’t mind working for their wives, as long as they get love and respect in return. Today men still have to work, and sometimes do the chores in the home as well, and there’s no guarantee they get much in return for that. Many men even work to support a family they’re not part of anymore.
Marriage = Bad deal.
EXACTY, women know exactly what htey are doing, but saying that they are “naturally” this way, does 2 things; They say to man that nothing can be changed, cos you can not change the nature of things, also it gives them redemption - oh we are already this way God created us this way, so we do nothing wrong, we are women so we have the right to do that, in fact we need more rights.
This way one could “explain” everything for ex; a serial murderer is also a God’s creature, give that someone more rights and opportunities to murder people.
In human history women always tried to be this way, but they did not have the opportunity. Knowing that men called them Devil’s creatures. So that’s where the story of Adam and Eve comes form. But in last decades we men thaught when we give women rights they will use it for the right cause, that thay will become competent. And what they are doing they are abusing the credit we gave them. Long soty short what women managed to do for the last decades is they have created a social pathology which size is killing all humanity.
You got a point there CS, women are just poorer version of men its like you would compare a Ferrari to a Fiat.
I think women aren’t born this way. They have the ability to think clearly (read Ester Vilar’s: The Manipulated Man - she was sent death threats based on the truths she told) but something gets lost along the way.
Maybe its the environment, maybe its peer pressure, maybe its our society and how shockingly tolerant we are about 2nd - rate behaviour from women and maybe its our society putting them on a pedastal where they don’t belong (NO WHERE in History has a woman been on a pedestal - except for Cleopatra or Boadicea, barbarian Queen of the Iceni, statue in london)
I seriously doubt its genetic (mostly an excuse). One example…Some cultures in the world don’t experience Menopausal symptoms. Whereas the women here go to psychics and crystal healers because they are a little hot. Eternally lamenting about their psychologically manifested symptoms.
I’ve also seen men behave as stupid as women. THey can’t talk clearly or formulate a directed thought. It comes out as passive aggressive filler that women are famous for.
I think it all has to how much EVERYTHING has become feminin. Everywhere you look you see foot in a high heel. As much as I love high heels on women, Id much rather see them upside down. This saturation of feminity is programming our men to become more like women and to lower their masculinity at the same time (If i hear another: “Yes dear, I’ll hold your purse” one more time…need to start deprogramming these men.)
I love women and we need Sun Tzu’s Art of War on Women to survive a) their games b) their manipulation and c) the movement to feminity here in North America.
WHAT WE NEED IS MORE MASCULIN RIGHTS OF PASSAGE…More creation, more innovation, more power!
Cheers.
The vast majority of western women have large labia and cliterises shaped like miniature penises. Keeping that in mind, is it any wonder that so many of the modern western women of today are rebelling against traditional femininity? Clearly, Sigmund Freud’s remarks on female psycho-sexual development are more relevant now than ever before.
Horsepussy!