I am shutting this site down.

Dick Masterson=Dildo wearing a Groucho mask! http://www.maleenhancement.org/

I’m sorry Dick, but violence is the answer. It wouldn’t be violence on your part, merely self-defense. That bitch that threatend you needs her fucking jaw broken. That way she can’t call you yapping like a chiuaua.

I encourage women, or anyone for that matter, to take a swing at me. That way you have the self-defense argument in court. You just have to be careful and use “reasonable force” or you will go to jail.

Chris Murphy said:

It is quite funny how whenever a man calls in, they back up their argument or beliefs with facts, first hand accounts, and truth, but whenever a woman calls, she just randomly insults Dick with the usual, “You’re gay!” or , “You’re ugly!”. Women are so stupid that they can’t back up their “arguments” with anything that makes any kind of sense. I also think it’s funny how one of the women told Dick he’s going to hell. A lot of the things Dick bashes women for only backs up the word of God, found in the Bible. God created MAN in his image, not women. A MAN shall leave his family and find a wife. Women in modern times are disobeying the word of a God who has been around since the beginning of our species, and even before then, and they wonder why men like Dick are telling them they’re stupid. I mean seriously, would you rather trust the word of a 25 year old woman who’s been sucking cock since she was 14, or would you trust the word of a God who’s been around since the beginning of time. The point is, women think they’re smarter than God, and THAT is the reason why they push for feminism. They think it will protect them and help them more than the word and law of God. Any woman who turns her back on the grace and word of God is a fool, and quite possibly a whore too.

As Commander Scott says, women are stupid. Say ‘no more’, as the donkey said when he pissed in the strawberries.

It is quite funny how whenever a man calls in, they back up their argument or beliefs with facts, first hand accounts, and truth, but whenever a woman calls, she just randomly insults Dick with the usual, “You’re gay!” or , “You’re ugly!”. Women are so stupid that they can’t back up their “arguments” with anything that makes any kind of sense. I also think it’s funny how one of the women told Dick he’s going to hell. A lot of the things Dick bashes women for only backs up the word of God, found in the Bible. God created MAN in his image, not women. A MAN shall leave his family and find a wife. Women in modern times are disobeying the word of a God who has been around since the beginning of our species, and even before then, and they wonder why men like Dick are telling them they’re stupid. I mean seriously, would you rather trust the word of a 25 year old woman who’s been sucking cock since she was 14, or would you trust the word of a God who’s been around since the beginning of time. The point is, women think they’re smarter than God, and THAT is the reason why they push for feminism. They think it will protect them and help them more than the word and law of God. Any woman who turns her back on the grace and word of God is a fool, and quite possibly a whore too.

Dawn said:

@ Studioline
Does that include me? ;)

It’s only Keb and me who feels it, besides who cares now, don’t worry about it, if anything happens I’ll take care of it

Last caller = biggest waste of oxygen ever. He completely managed to sound like a woman with his rambling, incoherent and nonsensical rant. What a joke.

@ Studioline
Does that include me? ;)

Guys,

Kelly is gone, she is not comeing back, she won’t respond, she’s got the point, she is learning, she becomes someone better now, a woman. You can congratulate yourself, you have saved her soul.

There are new cunts comeing that need to be saved…let’s do it.

studioline said:

@ Dawn

Congratulations !

Now you start seeing the Matrix. It claims to be you allay as well as all women, to protect and inform them. But in fact it is there to only teach you women how to fail. When it started for ex only like maybe 5 % of men were gay. Now it’s like maybe 40 %? anyways, its more, much more. Is it pleasurable for a guy, to get fucked by another? No, ofcourse not. But it’s still less dangerous than having anything to do with a woman. This is just another ex of The Social Matrix at it’s work. Are you or other women gaining anything from it? I don’t see any gain, at all. You become only weaker, fell less of self worth, and threfore easier to control, just so you can be turned into batterys for a CC’s. You women are now more inslaved than ever before, under a logo of your freedom. This site and men’s movement is for not only freeing men but you women ass well. We are not fighting each other, we are fighting The Social Matrix, and this is what we want you to see.

So what is it the men here want/need from a woman? It seems like we have no use at all…..the thought of being purposeless is depressing…

Truth said:

Kelly B said:

Sorry, I could not resist this one.

You do realize that IQ tests do not actually measure intelligence right? As a psychology major I know this first hand, especially from taking psychology history courses. They were created in times of recruitment for war and figuring out mental retardation.

BUT, if you would like an explanation for why men score higher it could most likely be because men have more of an opportunity to attend university (and recieve other such types of higher education) than women because they do not have to worry about such things as giving birth and childrearing, etc.

Stop being so ignorant… seriously. Don’t argue or put women down unless it’s based on something more factual…

There is NO EVIDENCE men are smarter or better, or whatever else you want to dream up, than women.

The sooner you realize it, the sooner you can move on with your life and stop being so pathetic.

For someone claiming to be a psychology major you sure don’t know shit about IQ tests.

Truth said:

Kelly B said:

Sorry, I could not resist this one.

You do realize that IQ tests do not actually measure intelligence right? As a psychology major I know this first hand, especially from taking psychology history courses. They were created in times of recruitment for war and figuring out mental retardation.

BUT, if you would like an explanation for why men score higher it could most likely be because men have more of an opportunity to attend university (and recieve other such types of higher education) than women because they do not have to worry about such things as giving birth and childrearing, etc.

Stop being so ignorant… seriously. Don’t argue or put women down unless it’s based on something more factual…

There is NO EVIDENCE men are smarter or better, or whatever else you want to dream up, than women.

The sooner you realize it, the sooner you can move on with your life and stop being so pathetic.

For someone claiming to be a psychology major you sure don’t know shit about IQ tests.

Hey Kelly, what the fuck does “worrying about childbirth” have to do with being a fucking dumbass? Are you saying that women of all ages can’t think straight because they’re preparing for childbirth? Apparently an 18 year old girl can’t score better than an 18 year old guy on an IQ test because she’s being held back by her need to give birth. Even if the shitty excuse you gave made sense (it doesn’t) it would still mean men are better than women. I’m no fervent believer in this stuff but you’re not doing your cause any good, believe me. I could go on all day about how little sense your post makes… but it would be too fucking painful.

Kelly B said:

Dutch269 said:

Excellent points, I have taken many IQ tests and I always fall between 118-125. These tests are only partly based on education and memory.

Justin your so right, so many young men think they can get more pussy if they just fight for the girls side, but thankfully there are many that are like us, strong and dominant, and want nothing to do with those feminist pigs.

Ladies, before you start harping, strong does not mean beating up women or degrading them, it simply means we don’t put up with BS, not from you, not from anyone.

In my office, I am considered the “hard ass” of the bunch, one guy called me a “Gentle giant”, and guess what, all the chicks in my office flirt with me constantly. I play the game, but I never get suckered into the BS, and I get major respect for it.

Time for all men to take a stand.

I have taken a lot of those so called “intelligence tests” you speak of too (only psychologists and psychiatrists can administer an actual legitimate intelligence test.) and I always get a 124-ish. Looks like you aren’t that much “smarter” than me after all.

Late reply, but I never said I was smarter than you. I am however, better than you at being a human being. My post was for the retard female who thinks IQ tests are worthless.

Just like an ignorant female, you assume my disgust for you is because I am somehow afraid of your IQ. Why cant females just face the truth?

There are so few good women out there today. A women that can handle responsibility and show respect where its due. A women who understands justice and fairness.

I’m gunna keep looking though, Ive got too much to offer, and I wont settle for a women like you.

no manhole said:

Muzalon said:

no manhole said:

Jim said:

When a man realises the true nature of women, he goes through a period of despair, and then understanding, and finally acceptance and enlightenment. Then he can be happy. He must lower his expectations, and then he can be thankful for even the smallest courtesy from a woman.

Well said. In terms of dating, Ive learned that, for most (but not all) women, there is a certain “game” you have to play: a certain choreographed series of events that must play out to create attraction. What I find most disturbing is that women claim the opposite, they don’t want games.

Finding a single woman that does not need to be played is truly exhilirating, but she is sadly rare.

Maybe that sequence of ‘expected’ events has evolved. I am thinking of the male Bower Bird, who is expected to build an elaborate bower before a female will consider him. Any deviation from an archetypal behavioural model, and he will be rejected.

I think what pisses me off personally, perhaps the most, was that I was completely fooled by the PC-correct feminist line that women don’t want games, they want openess and to be treated as equals by men, including equal skills. I feel this is false, this is not what they really want. What they want is a composite: for men to assume the traditional roles of being a man (skills that suggest competence: bread winner, good dancer, athletic, whatever), with the emotional skills of women. Except, you have to be careful when you reveal your skills, particularly the emotional ones, during the dating ritual.

I wasted so many of my years being fooled by the feminist PC crap. I feel now I know what many women truly want. I am very angry for being lied to by political correctness, some of it came from my own mother. This is my rant for the week.

I think the lies promoted about women in the liberal media help to create this sense of disillusionment. Women get a very ‘good press’; when self-aware men find most women under 30 are grasping, selsish and addicted to violent sociopaths, it can be quite a shock. But a man has to live with reality, however distasteful.

Yap, The Social Matrix is a bitch isn’t it?

I play Pink Floyd “Animals” as I work, hearing the doleful yet incisive tones of Rogers Waters’s bass guitar. I feel a great darkness descending upon me. I hear the call of the Prince of Darkness (SOTS). I must resist. I must. :)

@ No manhole, I feel you..

In order for them to be equal, they would have to learn how to seduce men. Instead they only know how to capture a man, which is a very primitive “technique”, which basicly doesn’t work with any human since like the dawn of time;) But how they are going to teach themselves how to seduce a man if they don’t even in the first place have a clue who the fuck men are.

Muzalon said:

no manhole said:

Jim said:

When a man realises the true nature of women, he goes through a period of despair, and then understanding, and finally acceptance and enlightenment. Then he can be happy. He must lower his expectations, and then he can be thankful for even the smallest courtesy from a woman.

Well said. In terms of dating, Ive learned that, for most (but not all) women, there is a certain “game” you have to play: a certain choreographed series of events that must play out to create attraction. What I find most disturbing is that women claim the opposite, they don’t want games.

Finding a single woman that does not need to be played is truly exhilirating, but she is sadly rare.

Maybe that sequence of ‘expected’ events has evolved. I am thinking of the male Bower Bird, who is expected to build an elaborate bower before a female will consider him. Any deviation from an archetypal behavioural model, and he will be rejected.

I think what pisses me off personally, perhaps the most, was that I was completely fooled by the PC-correct feminist line that women don’t want games, they want openess and to be treated as equals by men, including equal skills. I feel this is false, this is not what they really want. What they want is a composite: for men to assume the traditional roles of being a man (skills that suggest competence: bread winner, good dancer, athletic, whatever), with the emotional skills of women. Except, you have to be careful when you reveal your skills, particularly the emotional ones, during the dating ritual.

I wasted so many of my years being fooled by the feminist PC crap. I feel now I know what many women truly want. I am very angry for being lied to by political correctness, some of it came from my own mother. This is my rant for the week.

no manhole said:

Jim said:

When a man realises the true nature of women, he goes through a period of despair, and then understanding, and finally acceptance and enlightenment. Then he can be happy. He must lower his expectations, and then he can be thankful for even the smallest courtesy from a woman.

Well said. In terms of dating, Ive learned that, for most (but not all) women, there is a certain “game” you have to play: a certain choreographed series of events that must play out to create attraction. What I find most disturbing is that women claim the opposite, they don’t want games.

Finding a single woman that does not need to be played is truly exhilirating, but she is sadly rare.

Women say they don’t want games and it’s “true”. They don’t want a man to play games, they only want to play games themselves. Pls understand them;) if you have discovered something and that was the only thing you have discovered, and the only thing you had, would you like someone else use it without your consent? Hugh?

no manhole said:

Jim said:

When a man realises the true nature of women, he goes through a period of despair, and then understanding, and finally acceptance and enlightenment. Then he can be happy. He must lower his expectations, and then he can be thankful for even the smallest courtesy from a woman.

Well said. In terms of dating, Ive learned that, for most (but not all) women, there is a certain “game” you have to play: a certain choreographed series of events that must play out to create attraction. What I find most disturbing is that women claim the opposite, they don’t want games.

Finding a single woman that does not need to be played is truly exhilirating, but she is sadly rare.

Maybe that sequence of ‘expected’ events has evolved. I am thinking of the male Bower Bird, who is expected to build an elaborate bower before a female will consider him. Any deviation from an archetypal behavioural model, and he will be rejected.

Well said Jim ;)

Like let’s be thankful, when a woman for ex gives us a courtesy of farting in our direction;) Ooh, poor women we don’t want to lower our expectations, and be thakful often enough, that’s the problem right there. Women would be happy to teach us how to be thankful especialy some of them, but Dick M. messes it all up. Let’s beat that guy. Oooh he so baaad not knowing that, woman are better, he so meeeean, he hates all god’s creatures, he should go to jail and hell. Why can’t some men understand this and be real understaning men. WTF these guys want, they must be all gay.

Jim said:

When a man realises the true nature of women, he goes through a period of despair, and then understanding, and finally acceptance and enlightenment. Then he can be happy. He must lower his expectations, and then he can be thankful for even the smallest courtesy from a woman.

Well said. In terms of dating, Ive learned that, for most (but not all) women, there is a certain “game” you have to play: a certain choreographed series of events that must play out to create attraction. What I find most disturbing is that women claim the opposite, they don’t want games.

Finding a single woman that does not need to be played is truly exhilirating, but she is sadly rare.

Jim said:

Muzalon said:

son of the suns said:

Withdrawl of blood is more effective than consent.

‘In Anglo-Saxon civilisation, and particularly in America, the man who exhausts his life and time in business and the search for wealth, a wealth that, to a large extent, only serves to pay for feminine luxury, caprices, vices and refinements, has conceded to the woman the privilege and even the monopoly of dealing with ’spiritual’ things. And it is precisely in this civilisation that we see a proliferation of ’spiritualist’, spiritistic, mystic sects, in which the predominance of the feminine element is already significant in itself (the main one, the theosophical sect, was purely and simply created and managed by women, Blavatsky, Besant and, finally, Bailey). But it is for a much more important reason that the new spiritualism appears to us as a sort of reincarnation of the ancient feminine mysteries : it is the formless escapism in confused suprasensual experiences, the promiscuity of mediumism and spiritualism, the unconscious evocation of truly ‘infernal’ influences and the stress laid on doctrines such as reincarnation, that confirm, in such pseudo-spiritualistic currents, the correspondence that we have already mentioned and prove that, in these misguided desires to go beyond ‘materialism’, the modern world has not managed to find anything that would connect it with the higher, Olympian and ’solar’ traditions of Aryan spirituality.’

This guy’s name was Baron Julius Evola, and he prefigured many of the things we discuss in his writings, for example the rise of women to dominance in contemporary society:

http://www.juliusevola.it/documenti/template.asp?cod=632

Evola taught that we are in an age that is predicted in all ancient scriptures, namely the Kali Yuga or Age of Kali, when women will be insolent and disobedient to their husbands and fathers, and entirely without respect for men. He argued that the Anglo-Saxon world is the most debased in its sickly worship of women, and most declined into degeneracy, worshipping only the basest values.

All sounds eerily familiar, doesn’t it?

This is a good post. It is very true.
See http://www.heretical.com for more on this too. The advance of feminism will not stop. There is no limit to its ambitions. Eventually men will be in veal crates if we do not stop this.
Women do not understand what they are doing to our people and our society. They need to reflect, and wonder why, after so many thousands of years women have decided to hate men, when all they had before was love to give.

What has caused this change? Advice to women: seek the cause of this change, and your eyes will be opened. Note to men: women will never do that on their own, so you need to help them. Go to http://www.heretical.com and read everything there.

I think some of the articles on women are interesting, though I find the anti-Semitic ones distasteful (and questionable).

Dawn said:

studioline said:

Dawn said:

I wasn’t trying to erase the issue at all, I thought you made a valid point.
I’m 21, I still have a lot of learning to do…

Ok, if so then learn what I just wote before and if you have questions ask them – learning is about asking questions, isn’t it? The point is you won’t find the ansewrs in the Social Matrix, becasue it supposed to “fuckâ€? your brain in the first place, so you fail, only acting as you allay.
Earlier you wrote a double standrd, and realy it goes like this; if a womam get hit by a man, he goes to jail even if he didn’t do it, just because she felt like saying so. If a men gets hit by a woman, and if,if he admits it, he will only be lought at. Of course you can pretend like you don’t know it. Are you still suprised that men get pissed off?

No, I get it, you’re completely right, it’s true. If a man’s wife starts beating him, punching him, kicking him, he is expected to just take it, he’s not even allowed to fight back or even protect himself or the woman will claim that HE assaulted HER.
Makes complete sense now…thanks

That happens all the time. I personally know someone in that situation as well.
If a woman makes a false rape complaint, nothing happens to her even though the accusation is more serious than murder.
Women on this site who think men’s complaints are not worth listening to should try a bit harder to listen. Men are hurting, and women as usual are completely unsympathetic. Its the way its always been I guess. Try listening for a change and find out what’s wrong, and maybe you can help fix it. There is a belief in our society that the troubles and pain of men are either trivial, deserved, or easily manageable. The troubles of women on the other hand are serious and require all manner of resources to remedy.

Men are better than women at suffering getting on with it. They have to be.
Women are often pleased to see a man in pain. They are often vindictive and will put a man in prison on a false charge and feel no guilt or sympathy. When a man realises the true nature of women, he goes through a period of despair, and then understanding, and finally acceptance and enlightenment. Then he can be happy. He must lower his expectations, and then he can be thankful for even the smallest courtesy from a woman.

Muzalon said:

son of the suns said:

Withdrawl of blood is more effective than consent.

‘In Anglo-Saxon civilisation, and particularly in America, the man who exhausts his life and time in business and the search for wealth, a wealth that, to a large extent, only serves to pay for feminine luxury, caprices, vices and refinements, has conceded to the woman the privilege and even the monopoly of dealing with ’spiritual’ things. And it is precisely in this civilisation that we see a proliferation of ’spiritualist’, spiritistic, mystic sects, in which the predominance of the feminine element is already significant in itself (the main one, the theosophical sect, was purely and simply created and managed by women, Blavatsky, Besant and, finally, Bailey). But it is for a much more important reason that the new spiritualism appears to us as a sort of reincarnation of the ancient feminine mysteries : it is the formless escapism in confused suprasensual experiences, the promiscuity of mediumism and spiritualism, the unconscious evocation of truly ‘infernal’ influences and the stress laid on doctrines such as reincarnation, that confirm, in such pseudo-spiritualistic currents, the correspondence that we have already mentioned and prove that, in these misguided desires to go beyond ‘materialism’, the modern world has not managed to find anything that would connect it with the higher, Olympian and ’solar’ traditions of Aryan spirituality.’

This guy’s name was Baron Julius Evola, and he prefigured many of the things we discuss in his writings, for example the rise of women to dominance in contemporary society:

http://www.juliusevola.it/documenti/template.asp?cod=632

Evola taught that we are in an age that is predicted in all ancient scriptures, namely the Kali Yuga or Age of Kali, when women will be insolent and disobedient to their husbands and fathers, and entirely without respect for men. He argued that the Anglo-Saxon world is the most debased in its sickly worship of women, and most declined into degeneracy, worshipping only the basest values.

All sounds eerily familiar, doesn’t it?

This is a good post. It is very true.
See http://www.heretical.com for more on this too. The advance of feminism will not stop. There is no limit to its ambitions. Eventually men will be in veal crates if we do not stop this.
Women do not understand what they are doing to our people and our society. They need to reflect, and wonder why, after so many thousands of years women have decided to hate men, when all they had before was love to give.

What has caused this change? Advice to women: seek the cause of this change, and your eyes will be opened. Note to men: women will never do that on their own, so you need to help them. Go to http://www.heretical.com and read everything there.

He looks like me with a full head of hair and middle aged.

There are no shortage of beta males to continue the system of fem worship without our consent.. they’d be fine actually without having to pathetically fail to outcompete us for breeding rights.

If we want our race to survive we must take control of what’s ours. A king must learn to hurt the ones he loves.

son of the suns said:

Withdrawl of blood is more effective than consent.

‘In Anglo-Saxon civilisation, and particularly in America, the man who exhausts his life and time in business and the search for wealth, a wealth that, to a large extent, only serves to pay for feminine luxury, caprices, vices and refinements, has conceded to the woman the privilege and even the monopoly of dealing with ’spiritual’ things. And it is precisely in this civilisation that we see a proliferation of ’spiritualist’, spiritistic, mystic sects, in which the predominance of the feminine element is already significant in itself (the main one, the theosophical sect, was purely and simply created and managed by women, Blavatsky, Besant and, finally, Bailey). But it is for a much more important reason that the new spiritualism appears to us as a sort of reincarnation of the ancient feminine mysteries : it is the formless escapism in confused suprasensual experiences, the promiscuity of mediumism and spiritualism, the unconscious evocation of truly ‘infernal’ influences and the stress laid on doctrines such as reincarnation, that confirm, in such pseudo-spiritualistic currents, the correspondence that we have already mentioned and prove that, in these misguided desires to go beyond ‘materialism’, the modern world has not managed to find anything that would connect it with the higher, Olympian and ’solar’ traditions of Aryan spirituality.’

This guy’s name was Baron Julius Evola, and he prefigured many of the things we discuss in his writings, for example the rise of women to dominance in contemporary society:

http://www.juliusevola.it/documenti/template.asp?cod=632

Evola taught that we are in an age that is predicted in all ancient scriptures, namely the Kali Yuga or Age of Kali, when women will be insolent and disobedient to their husbands and fathers, and entirely without respect for men. He argued that the Anglo-Saxon world is the most debased in its sickly worship of women, and most declined into degeneracy, worshipping only the basest values.

All sounds eerily familiar, doesn’t it?

Writing to Kellybs is like shooting your own foot. She looks at it in a diferent way. For her/ them arguing, or writning at er/them = attnetnion=pussy power. So guys can argue with them all they want, and the content will mean shit for them, cos they do not look at the content at all.

As the great Chris Rock once said, men will never ‘win’ an argument because they’re handicapped by the need to make sense. Women are in it for distance and irritation — ‘how long can I yap on before the motherfucker snaps?’.

Billy said:

Evidence that most women are just too lame to admit what they know is true. We didnt have this phoney competition with women in the 60’s. Women are so gullible.
Arguing with these dumbasses only gives them a false hope that they may be correct. Emotional thinking is backwards of logic.

Fuk off dopey

@Billy,

You’ve got it. Writing to Kellybs is like shooting your own foot. She looks at it in a diferent way. For her/ them arguing, or writning at er/them = attnetnion=pussy power. So guys can argue with them all they want, and the content will mean shit for them, cos they do not look at the content at all.

Like Arbalest said they can only realate to something which realates to them. And that something is their pussys, because it’s the only thing on their minds, because it’s the only thing they have, its the only “advantage”. So what to do instead of giving them attention=pussy power?

Guys, you just simply say; I DONT WANT YOU PUSSY. It is that simple.

It’s ok to say it! Do it and you’ll see what happens. Now they understand everything after you say it, they pay attention, it’s important to them. Othervise they won’t ever have a need to understand. It is that simple.

Muzalon said:

… Men must withdraw all consent from society until these issues are addressed… no marriage, no kids, no voting, no participation. Hold fast to the task, guys: never yield.

Good point Muzalon!

If I had a nickel every time I heard a girl say “I’m a psychology major so I know”, I’d be a millionaire.

Kelly B said:

Sorry, I could not resist this one.

You do realize that IQ tests do not actually measure intelligence right? As a psychology major I know this first hand, especially from taking psychology history courses. They were created in times of recruitment for war and figuring out mental retardation.

BUT, if you would like an explanation for why men score higher it could most likely be because men have more of an opportunity to attend university (and recieve other such types of higher education) than women because they do not have to worry about such things as giving birth and childrearing, etc.

Stop being so ignorant… seriously. Don’t argue or put women down unless it’s based on something more factual…

There is NO EVIDENCE men are smarter or better, or whatever else you want to dream up, than women.

The sooner you realize it, the sooner you can move on with your life and stop being so pathetic.

For someone claiming to be a psychology major you sure don’t know shit about IQ tests.

Every corporation in America today looks like this:

Executive: All men and one token women (either from a top school or who sucked and fucked).
Middle Management: Over 90% women.
Workers: All men in jobs of necessity, with some women or gay guys in secretarial jobs.

The reason is that corporations are required to hire women (at least the handicap is applied equally). Productivity is king, so women are always slotted into middle management where both the executive board and laborers can say “what a great report”, and then simply ignore the conclusions and recommendations and get back to work after the meeting. Unfortunately, many of these women are earning very high salaries because they are managers, putting further drain on company resources.

HP’s CEO was a women and now all the HP products (printers, scanners, computers, etc…) go through a zillion self-checks every time you require something of them, and they’re always breaking down… just like a women.

Kelly B said:

How about you get an education and then come back and see if your explanations actually are explanations at all.

Evidence that most women are just too lame to admit what they know is true. We didnt have this phoney competition with women in the 60’s. Women are so gullible.
Arguing with these dumbasses only gives them a false hope that they may be correct. Emotional thinking is backwards of logic.

Fuk off dopey

Because women can only relate to something if it relates to them. Simple.

Dawn said:

studioline said:

Dawn said:

Why are so many men on here so angry? Yeesh, what did I say to piss you off so much?

@Dawn;

Hey,

Because Men have been abused for past 30 plus years. Imagine being abused that long, and not even being able to speak up. Imagine being humiliated for that long and not even having the right to say it. And imagine that a reasn for being abused could be amnong many for ex just being perfect or too ideal, or even simply too “nice”. And what women do when they finally hear us speak? They lough, deny it, act suprized, threat us in various ways, call us gay and so on… There goes you answer!

Ok, good point, but everything you just wrote applies to a lot of women too…what about all the women that get the shit beat out of them by their boyfriends/husbands, and have to hide in fear for the rest of their lives…? I feel for them, but it’s not going to make me pissed off at all men…I could understand if I had laughed at someone’s post, or called them gay, or went on some kind of angry rant where “fuck” is every second word, but I haven’t….some of the points about women on here are very valid.

Who gives a fuck if it happened to “A lot of Women”, that is not the point of THIS website.

We don’t want you fucking women here, why is that so hard to understand?

Withdrawl of blood is more effective than consent.

@ Dawn

Congratulations !

Now you start seeing the Matrix. It claims to be you allay as well as all women, to protect and inform them. But in fact it is there to only teach you women how to fail. When it started for ex only like maybe 5 % of men were gay. Now it’s like maybe 40 %? anyways, its more, much more. Is it pleasurable for a guy, to get fucked by another? No, ofcourse not. But it’s still less dangerous than having anything to do with a woman. This is just another ex of The Social Matrix at it’s work. Are you or other women gaining anything from it? I don’t see any gain, at all. You become only weaker, fell less of self worth, and threfore easier to control, just so you can be turned into batterys for a CC’s. You women are now more inslaved than ever before, under a logo of your freedom. This site and men’s movement is for not only freeing men but you women ass well. We are not fighting each other, we are fighting The Social Matrix, and this is what we want you to see.

Wow….poor guy….its amazing that he really didn’t beat her, because she sounds like a psycho…

Dawn said:

-That post was in response to your post concerning the man you know who got arrested….but I’m sure you used your manly brain to figure that out all on your own ;)

It is far more serious than that. She once beat him and locked him out in the middle of winter, so he had to sleep in the car and nearly died of exposure. If I had not brought him a hot drink and a blanket he might have frozen to death. This is someone who served his country for many years in the dangerous role of bomb disposal expert, for which he was decorated, yet every time she attacks him, he is arrested! That Michael is living in Wonderland, he really is… men are 10th class citizens across the Anglo-Saxon world, right now, no question of it. Women have no respect for men at all and the Courts and State support them. Men must withdraw all consent from society until these issues are addressed… no marriage, no kids, no voting, no participation. Hold fast to the task, guys: never yield.

-That post was in response to your post concerning the man you know who got arrested….but I’m sure you used your manly brain to figure that out all on your own ;)

It’s true….it’s really sad actually. There shouldn’t be a double standard like that. I don’t understand how or why women can get away with that, and the really vengeful ones WILL claim that they were just “protecting” themselves from their big scary husband, when in reality HE was probably the one trying to protect himself from getting his teeth knocked out….

Some women really do try to use the “damsel in distress” card and I can really see why all the men on here see them as manipulative bitches…

irlandes said:

Tell me again, idiots one and all, how the evil patriarchy forced all those women on the Titanic to stand on deck singing hymns while the men took all the lifeboats, and the captain ordered any woman shot who tried to get in a lifeboat.

Some years ago, I challenged anyone anywhere to write a believable science fiction story, describing a slave society on any planet in the Universe, where the slaves were so valuable that their masters would voluntarily go down with the ship so the slaves would be saved. I am still waiting.

In fact, at every point in history, women have had the best treatment their society had to offer. If women had it rough, men had it rougher. If women worked long hours in the home, men worked at physically deblitating, dangerous jobs.

Read MIDDLETOWN USA, the sociology primer for the US, back in the 20’s. There is a chapter in that book telling just how dangerous the jobs were. The manager of a factory joked (hee, hee joked) that he kept a wagon by the door to cart off the maimed and injured male workers. He had one machine which ripped off an average of one hand a month.

The average man had a lengthy injury absence every so many years. Not only would no woman have accepted such a job, but the neighbors would have lynched any man who told his wife to apply for such a job.

Ignorant and stupid men and women today judge history by what they see today. Jobs in those days were simply beyond the capacity of most women, as strong as most women were then. Today, when women sit around nice, a/c offices, wearing their Victoria’s Secret underwear, they really believe there was an evil discrimination against women in the workplace in those days.

One reason why men earn more is that men will take dangerous jobs women will not do. Deep sea welding is dangerous, and so demanding it leaves men finished by 35. It pays well, but what do people expect for those risks? The minimum wage? I don’t see women signing up for that … don’t think I ever will, either.

Dawn said:

studioline said:

Dawn said:

I wasn’t trying to erase the issue at all, I thought you made a valid point.
I’m 21, I still have a lot of learning to do…

Ok, if so then learn what I just wote before and if you have questions ask them – learning is about asking questions, isn’t it? The point is you won’t find the ansewrs in the Social Matrix, becasue it supposed to “fuckâ€? your brain in the first place, so you fail, only acting as you allay.
Earlier you wrote a double standrd, and realy it goes like this; if a womam get hit by a man, he goes to jail even if he didn’t do it, just because she felt like saying so. If a men gets hit by a woman, and if,if he admits it, he will only be lought at. Of course you can pretend like you don’t know it. Are you still suprised that men get pissed off?

No, I get it, you’re completely right, it’s true. If a man’s wife starts beating him, punching him, kicking him, he is expected to just take it, he’s not even allowed to fight back or even protect himself or the woman will claim that HE assaulted HER.
Makes complete sense now…thanks

I know a man who suffers exactly that… and yes, he is the one arrested.

studioline said:

Dawn said:

I wasn’t trying to erase the issue at all, I thought you made a valid point.
I’m 21, I still have a lot of learning to do…

Ok, if so then learn what I just wote before and if you have questions ask them – learning is about asking questions, isn’t it? The point is you won’t find the ansewrs in the Social Matrix, becasue it supposed to “fuckâ€? your brain in the first place, so you fail, only acting as you allay.
Earlier you wrote a double standrd, and realy it goes like this; if a womam get hit by a man, he goes to jail even if he didn’t do it, just because she felt like saying so. If a men gets hit by a woman, and if,if he admits it, he will only be lought at. Of course you can pretend like you don’t know it. Are you still suprised that men get pissed off?

No, I get it, you’re completely right, it’s true. If a man’s wife starts beating him, punching him, kicking him, he is expected to just take it, he’s not even allowed to fight back or even protect himself or the woman will claim that HE assaulted HER.
Makes complete sense now…thanks

irlandes said:

Tell me again, idiots one and all, how the evil patriarchy forced all those women on the Titanic to stand on deck singing hymns while the men took all the lifeboats, and the captain ordered any woman shot who tried to get in a lifeboat.

Some years ago, I challenged anyone anywhere to write a believable science fiction story, describing a slave society on any planet in the Universe, where the slaves were so valuable that their masters would voluntarily go down with the ship so the slaves would be saved. I am still waiting.

In fact, at every point in history, women have had the best treatment their society had to offer. If women had it rough, men had it rougher. If women worked long hours in the home, men worked at physically deblitating, dangerous jobs.

Read MIDDLETOWN USA, the sociology primer for the US, back in the 20’s. There is a chapter in that book telling just how dangerous the jobs were. The manager of a factory joked (hee, hee joked) that he kept a wagon by the door to cart off the maimed and injured male workers. He had one machine which ripped off an average of one hand a month.

The average man had a lengthy injury absence every so many years. Not only would no woman have accepted such a job, but the neighbors would have lynched any man who told his wife to apply for such a job.

Ignorant and stupid men and women today judge history by what they see today. Jobs in those days were simply beyond the capacity of most women, as strong as most women were then. Today, when women sit around nice, a/c offices, wearing their Victoria’s Secret underwear, they really believe there was an evil discrimination against women in the workplace in those days.

Great story man!;)

son of the suns said:

Imagine the trouble saved if we could simply kill to the last body these social programming post-modern scum who brainwash moron females.

After all.. the truth is on our side.

Elou,
And we can and it’s very simple and I can tell how to anyone who asks. We men just do not realize how simple it is. Of course it’s on our side.

Tell me again, idiots one and all, how the evil patriarchy forced all those women on the Titanic to stand on deck singing hymns while the men took all the lifeboats, and the captain ordered any woman shot who tried to get in a lifeboat.

Some years ago, I challenged anyone anywhere to write a believable science fiction story, describing a slave society on any planet in the Universe, where the slaves were so valuable that their masters would voluntarily go down with the ship so the slaves would be saved. I am still waiting.

In fact, at every point in history, women have had the best treatment their society had to offer. If women had it rough, men had it rougher. If women worked long hours in the home, men worked at physically deblitating, dangerous jobs.

Read MIDDLETOWN USA, the sociology primer for the US, back in the 20’s. There is a chapter in that book telling just how dangerous the jobs were. The manager of a factory joked (hee, hee joked) that he kept a wagon by the door to cart off the maimed and injured male workers. He had one machine which ripped off an average of one hand a month.

The average man had a lengthy injury absence every so many years. Not only would no woman have accepted such a job, but the neighbors would have lynched any man who told his wife to apply for such a job.

Ignorant and stupid men and women today judge history by what they see today. Jobs in those days were simply beyond the capacity of most women, as strong as most women were then. Today, when women sit around nice, a/c offices, wearing their Victoria’s Secret underwear, they really believe there was an evil discrimination against women in the workplace in those days.

Imagine the trouble saved if we could simply kill to the last body these social programming post-modern scum who brainwash moron females.

After all.. the truth is on our side.

Dawn said:

I wasn’t trying to erase the issue at all, I thought you made a valid point.
I’m 21, I still have a lot of learning to do…

Ok, if so then learn what I just wote before and if you have questions ask them – learning is about asking questions, isn’t it? The point is you won’t find the ansewrs in the Social Matrix, becasue it supposed to “fuckâ€? your brain in the first place, so you fail, only acting as you allay.
Earlier you wrote a double standrd, and realy it goes like this; if a womam get hit by a man, he goes to jail even if he didn’t do it, just because she felt like saying so. If a men gets hit by a woman, and if,if he admits it, he will only be lought at. Of course you can pretend like you don’t know it. Are you still suprised that men get pissed off?

The name Michael is a misnomer. The correct spelling is Michelle. I hate people who lie.

This has been posted on other URL’s, but a while ago, I looked out my window here in the mountains of Mexico. Everything I can see out there was made by men, 100%, except an old junk car in the neighbors land. I understand in the US there are female assemblers, so I have to admit that car might have had female contributions, as much as 0.05%.

Every other thing; electric wires; houses; buildings; telephone wires; the road itself; the fences; the concrete posts; the water system; all made 100% by men. If all the work of vile, evil, inferior, worthless, violent men was removed from this village of 12,000, there would be no visible sign of human habitation.

Even the house itself, mostly concrete, sand, gravel, and re-bar, was almost 100% made by men. Not just the construction of the house, but the mining and foundry work for the metal; also the sand and gravel was quarried by men, 100%.

There are a few things in the house, such as electronics, that may have had female assembly. But, they were all invented by men and the factories were built by men, and the infrastructure to run the factories was built by men.

And, that is the way it is all over the world. Without evil men the human race would never have left the stone age. And, in places where women rule, except for goodies imported from the societies where men are allowed to produce things, they are in the Stone Age, too. I refer even to places like East Saint Louis where women rule, not just darkest Africa.

As far as historic oppression of women, I am reminded of my eldest daughter. She was raised with no male influence because her mom was a vile witch, and I divorced her. Even though my daughter admitted as an adult her life would have been much better if I had won custody, I did not.

When she met her current husband, around 15 years ago, in the Air Farce in Spain, and he proposed marriage, she told him she would never cook for him because any woman who cooks for her husband is his slave. And, the fool married her, anyway.

Eventually, he was discharged from the Air Farce as a radar technician, because all the promotions went to dearies, such as her. She was a very high priced, highly qualified typist. Unlike radar technicians who grow on every cactus, typists are so frickin’ hard to find…

He got a high paying job as FAA radar technician. She got a better than minimum wage job as a typist person.

After a time, she decided she wanted to have kids. He agreed. When she got pregnant, she got a burst of maternal hormones, and concluded she wanted to stay home with her baby when it was born. He said, sure, if they had a budget he could handle it with his good job.

As the time got closer, she began to realize it made no sense for her to be home all day and do no work while he was gone all day. So, she told him she would learn to cook. He told her he had promised he would cook and he would. But, she really figured out it made no sense to sit around while he was at work all day, then he had to do the work when he got home.

it slowly soaked into her stupid, thick head that women historically were not at all subjugated, oppressed, repressed, and enslaved. They were at home with their kids BEAUSE THAT IS WHERE THEY WANTED TO BE. And, they did the housework because in those days men went to work 70 or more hours a week, and there was no time left for them to run home and do all the housework while cupcake sat around doing exactly nothing. It was purely logical for the woman to do all the housework while the man earned all the money. It is called a division of labors, and only a psychotic feminist, whether male or female, would be unable to understand that simple concept.

Now, she brooks no nonsense from stupid men and women who believe women were historically enslaved.

studioline said:

Dawn said:

Ok, good point, but everything you just wrote applies to a lot of women too…what about all the women that get the shit beat out of them by their boyfriends/husbands, and have to hide in fear for the rest of their lives…? I feel for them, but it’s not going to make me pissed off at all men…I could understand if I had laughed at someone’s post, or called them gay, or went on some kind of angry rant where “fuck” is every second word, but I haven’t….some of the points about women on here are very valid.

I thought that you were inteligent, but you did not undestand a word form what I just wrote. Do you think you can erase the issue with a couter argument, deny it, pretend you don’t understand? I wrote you the answer because you rised the question, and if I didn’t, you would not find that answer in Cosmo magazine or anywhere else in the Social Matrix. But now at least you can’t say, you still don’t know the answer. And it was written here, on this site.

I wasn’t trying to erase the issue at all, I thought you made a valid point. I’m 21, I still have a lot of learning to do…

Dawn said:

Ok, good point, but everything you just wrote applies to a lot of women too…what about all the women that get the shit beat out of them by their boyfriends/husbands, and have to hide in fear for the rest of their lives…? I feel for them, but it’s not going to make me pissed off at all men…I could understand if I had laughed at someone’s post, or called them gay, or went on some kind of angry rant where “fuck” is every second word, but I haven’t….some of the points about women on here are very valid.

I thought that you were inteligent, but you did not undestand a word form what I just wrote. Do you think you can erase the issue with a couter argument, deny it, pretend you don’t understand? I wrote you the answer because you rised the question, and if I didn’t, you would not find that answer in Cosmo magazine or anywhere else in the Social Matrix. But now at least you can’t say, you still don’t know the answer. And it was written here, on this site.

studioline said:

Dawn said:

Why are so many men on here so angry? Yeesh, what did I say to piss you off so much?

@Dawn;

Hey,

Because Men have been abused for past 30 plus years. Imagine being abused that long, and not even being able to speak up. Imagine being humiliated for that long and not even having the right to say it. And imagine that a reasn for being abused could be amnong many for ex just being perfect or too ideal, or even simply too “nice”. And what women do when they finally hear us speak? They lough, deny it, act suprized, threat us in various ways, call us gay and so on… There goes you answer!

Ok, good point, but everything you just wrote applies to a lot of women too…what about all the women that get the shit beat out of them by their boyfriends/husbands, and have to hide in fear for the rest of their lives…? I feel for them, but it’s not going to make me pissed off at all men…I could understand if I had laughed at someone’s post, or called them gay, or went on some kind of angry rant where “fuck” is every second word, but I haven’t….some of the points about women on here are very valid.

Dawn said:

Why are so many men on here so angry? Yeesh, what did I say to piss you off so much?

@Dawn;

Hey,

Because Men have been abused for past 30 plus years. Imagine being abused that long, and not even being able to speak up. Imagine being humiliated for that long and not even having the right to say it. And imagine that a reasn for being abused could be amnong many for ex just being perfect or too ideal, or even simply too “nice”. And what women do when they finally hear us speak? They lough, deny it, act suprized, threat us in various ways, call us gay and so on… There goes you answer!

Dillard T. Wanker said:

Dawn said:

Why are so many men on here so angry? Yeesh, what did I say to piss you off so much?

You posted here, and continue to post here. Now get the fuck out.

Relax Dillard, it’s not like I’m disagreeing with what Dick’s saying…I haven’t been bitchy or whiny, and I have yet to use “you’re gay” as a plausible argument, so I think you can tolerate me for awhile…maybe concentrate on getting the crazy, ranting and cursing women out of here first

Necro – 86 Measures of Game

One that preaches the truth…

I have a new mind blowing theory on females and love I’ll post later in the general forum.

Michael said:

I think it’s important, however, to address why poronography exists. I believe it is because the male sexual needs are not being satisfied in some basic fashion by females

No manhole, no offense, but you are a fucking idiot. Rest assured, men’s sexual needs today are being satisfied on a historical scale never before known to civilization. Pornography is mainstream. If you don’t believe that that mainstream porn equates to mens sexual needs being able to be satisfied at any time, then I can’t fucking imagine what your opinion on the Victorian age would be.

Pornography exists because men have more power than women. Period.

Then why are women getting paid for it then? Quite frankly no one forced the women to participate, they do it on their own will for either money or the enjoyment of sex. Not only there are genres of porn tailored to the excitement of women, so that doesn’t make sense at all. Of course I’ve learned not to expect you to but still.

son of the suns said:

I never thought I would know anyone as skullfucked as Michelle that would make NMH look like a Taliban.

Thats the nicest thing you ever said about me. The Taliban, though? Ill get Ill just go out and mindlessly start to collect stones.

Oh, BTW, I want to thank you and Muzalon for your making me aware of the rising fundamentalist Islamic tide. I got “America alone” and its a fascinating read. I might vote for McCain. Thanks again.

I never thought I would know anyone as skullfucked as Michelle that would make NMH look like a Taliban.

If women were emotionally superior they’d be capable of fidelity, Michelle.

Not only are we stronger and smarter.. but also deeper.

Women are good for nothing breeders… to bad they like breeding with nothing but thugs and hillbillies and can’t be allowed to continue their occupation of this planet.

Michael said:

No manhole, it’s becoming clear you have never been in a relationship and you are possibly a virgin. All men, whether they are single or in a relationship look at other women and look at porn. Whether the porn is hardcore or simply bikini models, all men look at other women’s bodies aside from the woman they may be involved with because men cannot be sexually monogamous. Porn will never disappear because of this reason and this reason alone. Porn has nothing to do with men not being sexually satisfied by a mate, what it does have something to do with is sexual gluttony.

Actually I have been in several relationships, most notably my last one was for eight years. What I noted about myself was this: when I said and did the right things to get my girl in the mood, she granted me sex. Early on, I had plenty of sex, my sexual needs were satisfied, and I had no interest in porn at all (in additional to the fact that I completely adored her). As time progressed she became convinced of her superiority over me and for this and other reasons she granted me less sex, so I resulted to porn. I really don’t think my experience is unusual. In fact, I think its the norm.

Your lack of understanding of male grievences against women suggests VERY STRONGLY to me that YOU have never been in a relationship, or your just to whipped to dare to voice your own opinion to a woman, no matter what the truth may be. If you are doing this as in fact I think you are, than you are a pathetic man.

Michael said:

Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

The reason women don’t act as competent as men is not because they aren’t, but because they are not as confident. They do not believe in their competence because 99% of men act towards them as if they don’t expect them to be competent (Dick’s Master Class is on exactly this).

Treating women in this manner undermines their confidence in their abilities, which makes her step back and let men take the lead. This begins at a very young age for young girls. Educators know it, which is why they now work very hard not to undermine little girls sense of what they can achieve.

Any woman who doesn’t buy into an undermined position by a man is forced into an aggressive position automatically in order to get her opinion heard and taken seriously. She of course is then labeled a bitch feminist. Which is simply a shaming strategy, again designed to get her to shut up so a man appears more competent than her.

Men who win through bullying and undermining only prove they are competent manipulators of reality, nothing more.

The numbers go against what your saying. As you know, there are more women entering college than men than ever before–I have never thought that women are, overall, less competent than men (like most men here seem to think), and the numbers support this idea. Also, they suggest if there is any attempt for men to subjugate women than its failing miserably. Some writers have called this increase of women over men in certain professional ranks (medicine, law) the “new girl order” Interestingly, you seem to be ignoring the fact that young men, despite their innate IQ-descriptive abilities, are following behind, as countless cultural authors have observed. Why is this? Well, its because of our feminized culture that seeks to devalue men and feminize them (See Christina Hoff Sommers book “The War against Boys”).

Yea, sure, some men try to bully women. I think far more often than that men are held in thrall to women, and do and say anything as to not disturb them, so they are able to get sex b/c its in such short supply from their relatively frigid wives. Going to laugh at this as well, moron? How about if you read Thomas Ellis’s book “The rantings of a Single male”, for an opinion here?

You are terribly uninfromed.

No manhole, it’s becoming clear you have never been in a relationship and you are possibly a virgin. All men, whether they are single or in a relationship look at other women and look at porn. Whether the porn is hardcore or simply bikini models, all men look at other women’s bodies aside from the woman they may be involved with because men cannot be sexually monogamous. Porn will never disappear because of this reason and this reason alone. Porn has nothing to do with men not being sexually satisfied by a mate, what it does have something to do with is sexual gluttony.

Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

The reason women don’t act as competent as men is not because they aren’t, but because they are not as confident. They do not believe in their competence because 99% of men act towards them as if they don’t expect them to be competent (Dick’s Master Class is on exactly this).

Treating women in this manner undermines their confidence in their abilities, which makes her step back and let men take the lead. This begins at a very young age for young girls. Educators know it, which is why they now work very hard not to undermine little girls sense of what they can achieve.

Any woman who doesn’t buy into an undermined position by a man is forced into an aggressive position automatically in order to get her opinion heard and taken seriously. She of course is then labeled a bitch feminist. Which is simply a shaming strategy, again designed to get her to shut up so a man appears more competent than her.

Men who win through bullying and undermining only prove they are competent manipulators of reality, nothing more.

Michael said:

OMG. I just can’t get over how stupid you are. You are suggesting that if women satisfied men sexually by having sex with them that pornography would disappear! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

I guess this explains why men in relationships NEVER look at porn and don’t have porno collections. Yeah, you know, those men that don’t fucking exist.

Your the idiot. If a man is getting nicely-fucked often he is far less likely to look at porn. If he is single and not getting sex then he is more susceptable to porn. Fine, fool your self into thinking then women have nothing to do with the pornography problem and its all mens fault, you brain-washed retard. Yea, you’ll get dates, repeating what women want to hear, but you will never face the truth, and you will be used by women as you deserve to be.

Michael said:

I hardly watch TV but when I do, I can assure you that women are portrayed as nothing more than sexist objects or stupid far more than men are portrayed as idiots, this especially obvious in advertisements.

Seeing as we may be in different continents, why don’t you give us at least five examples of media images (Television or advertisements) in which men are portrayed as idiots.

I’ll make this fair and give you one top rating TV shows (US) in which women are portrayed as idiots and bimbos. I’d give you more but as I said, I don’t watch much TV.

1. Desperate Housewives.

I watch practically no TV. One of the things I do with my time, fuck-tard, is read literature to provide me with information so that I can form my own opinions. The Nathanson and Young book (I believe its one in a series) is extremely well-documented and is thought by at least one additional author (eg Bernard Chapin) to be the best description of the the misandrous bent of the media. I don’t think any list that you and I can form can compare in veracity to well-documented literature, dip-shit. Duh!

In my opinion, you are two brain-washed by the political correct media message that women are emotionally superior beings. I believe that men and women should be treated as equals because, for the most part, they are equals, with some differences in strengths/abilities here and there. However, I believe that radical feminism has tried to devalue men in society by brain-washing the denizens of our culure to think that women are emotionally and intellectually superior beings. For this reason, our culture seeks to feminize mens needs or completely ignore them.

OMG. I just can’t get over how stupid you are. You are suggesting that if women satisfied men sexually by having sex with them that pornography would disappear! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL

I guess this explains why men in relationships NEVER look at porn and don’t have porno collections. Yeah, you know, those men that don’t fucking exist.

Men’s sexual needs can never be satisfied. They are permanently desirous of women. You yourself said it exists because of demand, so what are you suggesting? Blinding all men so they can’t fucking see?

If we address the problem and satisfy men’s sexual needs naturally then pornography would go away.

Fuck me you are an idiot. As fucking if.

I hardly watch TV but when I do, I can assure you that women are portrayed as nothing more than sexist objects or stupid far more than men are portrayed as idiots, this especially obvious in advertisements.

Seeing as we may be in different continents, why don’t you give us at least five examples of media images (Television or advertisements) in which men are portrayed as idiots.

I’ll make this fair and give you one top rating TV shows (US) in which women are portrayed as idiots and bimbos. I’d give you more but as I said, I don’t watch much TV.

1. Desperate Housewives.

Michael said:

I think it’s important, however, to address why poronography exists. I believe it is because the male sexual needs are not being satisfied in some basic fashion by females

No manhole, no offense, but you are a fucking idiot. Rest assured, men’s sexual needs today are being satisfied on a historical scale never before known to civilization. Pornography is mainstream. If you don’t believe that that mainstream porn equates to mens sexual needs being able to be satisfied at any time, then I can’t fucking imagine what your opinion on the Victorian age would be.

Pornography exists because men have more power than women. Period.

I would say that a man satisfying his needs through pornography, ass-wipe, is not the optimal way of getting this done. Of course men would like to have women in their lives to have this done. Pornography is enough for many men to continue through life but in the end it does not make them as truely happy as a great sexual relationship with a women would.

Pornography exists because it fills a demand, moron. It would not exist if that were not the case. Why is this demand there? Because men’s needs are not being satisfied. If we address the problem and satisfy men’s sexual needs naturally then pornography would go away. It will NEVER disappear if this is not done. My guess is even Islamic societies which are predisposed against porn more than anglo societies have a greater need for it.

I suggest you keep posting. You’ll only make a fool of yourself and revitalize the thinking and efforts here.

*The rest of your post is some kind of self-aggrandizing drivel which is not worth addressing.*

You mean, those observations unsettle you.

Hardly, your observations are based on nothing more than very selective reading, which has a very biased interpretation of causative factors which do not take entire context into account.

Seeing as you forget, I’ll quote your self-aggrandizing drivel for you.

Little wonder we Jews are leading the way in challenging the feminist pseudo-consensus, which even many western women increasingly revile.

Michael said:

Spreading Misandry� that documents multitudes of instances of males appearing as idiots thanks to the media.

Many men are idiots. You seem to be suggesting that because not all men act like idiots all the time, they shouldn’t be portrayed in any negative fashion whatsoever in the media. Should the media do nothing but portray men as good and intelligent? That wouldn’t really be representative of reality though, would it. Meh. I shouldn’t really be bothering. You’re all convinced men are some kind of supernatural fucking beings without flaws. No doubt you do think men should only ever be portrayed positively because man simply cannot do wrong in your opinion. I don’t know what drugs you people are popping but you either need to get off them or share them around.

I think you would have to agree with me, dip-shit, that there are an equal number of men and women idiots in the world (although most on this site would say there are far more women). What the book suggests that there is a huge disproportionate emphasis of men being portrayed as idiots in the media over women, far more than what happens in real life. You are uninformed, as lost.

I think it’s important, however, to address why poronography exists. I believe it is because the male sexual needs are not being satisfied in some basic fashion by females

No manhole, no offense, but you are a fucking idiot. Rest assured, men’s sexual needs today are being satisfied on a historical scale never before known to civilization. Pornography is mainstream. If you don’t believe that that mainstream porn equates to mens sexual needs being able to be satisfied at any time, then I can’t fucking imagine what your opinion on the Victorian age would be.

Pornography exists because men have more power than women. Period.

Spreading Misandry� that documents multitudes of instances of males appearing as idiots thanks to the media.

Many men are idiots. You seem to be suggesting that because not all men act like idiots all the time, they shouldn’t be portrayed in any negative fashion whatsoever in the media. Should the media do nothing but portray men as good and intelligent? That wouldn’t really be representative of reality though, would it. Meh. I shouldn’t really be bothering. You’re all convinced men are some kind of supernatural fucking beings without flaws. No doubt you do think men should only ever be portrayed positively because man simply cannot do wrong in your opinion. I don’t know what drugs you people are popping but you either need to get off them or share them around.

@Micheal- I would like try to add a bit of information to you about misandrous media (hopefully Muzalon won’t mind). There is a book by Nathanson and Young called “Spreading Misandry” that documents multitudes of instances of males appearing as idiots thanks to the media. You can get a feel for what the book is like as it is described in Amazon reviews:

http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com/dicks-voicemail-7/#comment-236554

Also, I can understand why pornography is seen to lead in some fashion to the oppression of women. I think it’s important, however, to address why poronography exists. I believe it is because the male sexual needs are not being satisfied in some basic fashion by females (opined by Thomas Ellis but probably by others as well). Another question to ask is pornography a danger to society, for example Catherine MacKinnon and Andrea Dworkin predicted with the advent of the internet that widespread pornography would lead to a dramatic increase of rape and other sex-based crimes. In fact, that hasn’t happened, and I think the reason is that pornography is the great male pacifier, as Naomi Wolf opinied in this article:

http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/trends/n_9437/

no manhole said:

@Muzalon- you are really becoming an expert on the literature–maybe you should set up your own web site? Write a book? I implore you to harness and disseminate this great talent/energy for the greater man-good. Maybe you get start a mass cultural awakening and I can rescind my sex-bot order. :)

I am just rounding up my book now. It is indeed a revolution in Men’s Studies.

Michael said:

Suzie, he’d have to be an idiot to want to turn into a woman and lose his privileges.

far more funding is spent on women’s healthcare in countries with public healthcare systems,

Could this have anything to do with the fact that women’s reproductive systems mean they have far more complex and expensive health care requirements? Remind me, which sex gives birth again? It’s feasible that a man could go his entire life without entering a hospital system. That is hardly feasible for women, considering the majority do give birth, usually necessitating a hospital stay, not to mention gyno/obstretic checks.

although men make the primary economic contribution to those systems.

Stats? Facts? Regardless of your inability to provide any evidence, perhaps the fact that men earn more has something to do with more of their tax being spent on healthcare for women.

The media is also opposed to men (Nathanson and Young)

Incomplete citation. Year of publication? Peer reviewed? Critique? All you have done here is make a largely unqualified blanket statement. In what way is the media opposed to men? Surely you aren’t suggesting that pornography (the world’s largest media) oppresses and exploits men rather than women?

as are the courts (Farrell)

The courts have a mandate that decisions are predicated on the best interests of the child. Read that again perhaps, because it isn’t “in the best interests of the woman”, it’s “the best interests of the child.”
If it just so happens that the woman is usually the primary caretaker of a child and it would be in the child’s best interests not to be separated from their primary caretaker, then you can hardly blame that on the woman, unless she and the father fought over who was going to take on the role of primary carer prior to the child’s birth. Any bias towards woman in child custody determinations are therefore only consequences, not fundamental.

and general social support systems (90% of the western homeless are male, at least).

Got any stats on that because I see plenty of homeless women on the streets, living less than a minute from a homeless shelter, I can assure you that there is no gender discrimination in homelessness. It’s looking pretty equivalent from what I see daily. I think the point you are trying to make (badly) is that there are more accommodation services for homeless women than there are for men. To that I say, most men without a regular fixed address end up in prison, where they certainly aren’t on the streets. Most women in the same situation have children and are thus given accommodation in family crisis centres. If these women didn’t have children, then there would significantly less options for them. Again, it doesn’t come down to their gender, it comes down to whether they are the ones with dependents in their care.

US males are required to register for the Draft

In what way does this make men better than women? In what way should women be blamed for this? Do men in power enforce this ruling or do women in power enforce it? What would you like women to do about it?

Women, on the other hand, certainly white middle class post-feminists, have acquired plenty of rights with no obligations.

Hmmm, I certainly wasn’t aware that white middle class women were exempt from paying tax or abiding by the law like anything other citizen. Wow. You must live in a woman’s Utopia.

Women don’t enjoy many privileges when it comes to divorce either Muzalon. Studies have shown that the only women who benefit from divorce are those married to wealthy men, which according to your very stats would be 1% of all women. The majority of women fair 73% less well off after divorce, while men fair 30% less well off. Do some unbiased reading once in a while and maybe you’d learn a factoid or two.

The rest of your post is some kind of self-aggrandizing drivel which is not worth addressing.

This has really rattled your liberal, Anglo cage, hasn’t it? I seen no credible, dated or critiqued citations for any of the claims YOU make: your response seems to be anecdotes and completely unsubstantiated assertions. It’s all just begging the questions. For example, homeless men end up in prison: well, of course they will, if the provision for homeless men is desultory, and they have no other way of surviving but resorting to crime! Anyone with two brain-cells to rub together can see the flaws in your logic.

Another amusing bone of contention is the role of childbirth in inflating the amounts spent on women’s healthcare in countries with public healthcare systems. But in fact, feminist lobbyists are past masters at gulling Anglo-Saxon suckers like you. Take anorexia: gender feminists like Dworkin presented any vast figure that flitted into their heads to exaggerate the number of deaths from anorexia in the United States (Dworkin’s figure was ‘a million’). A (relatively) serious researcher, Christina Hoff Summers, found the real figure to be…uh, 100 (almost all white, upper middle class WASPs) using official US health statistics. Her research is presented in Who Stole Feminism? (1994) – a right riveting read. I myself am conducting research into the funding inequalities between suicide (a male issue) and anorexia (a female issue). In European counties, around 500 times more funds are allocated towards the prevention of anorexia than suicide, hardly evidence of an unbiased distribution of resources.

The Draft for males is a spiky one: it is not the result of a conscious agenda, more the product of legislation not being upgraded to match changing social circumstances. I don’t think women should be drafted for front line duties, as they are not ‘up to it’; they should be drafted for support duties, however, for example hospital work. I personally believe both sexes would benefit from a years’ National Service in the forces, even in peacetime, to give them a sense of responsibility and social participation. Many Anglo-American elite youths feel free to take from societal institutions, but give nothing back: this needs to change.

*The rest of your post is some kind of self-aggrandizing drivel which is not worth addressing.*

You mean, those observations unsettle you. Admittedly, as a white middle class male I enjoy certain advantages, but not in all spheres; nor are all males so advantaged. The issues are complex.

@Muzalon- you are really becoming an expert on the literature–maybe you should set up your own web site? Write a book? I implore you to harness and disseminate this great talent/energy for the greater man-good. Maybe you get start a mass cultural awakening and I can rescind my sex-bot order. :)

Suzie, he’d have to be an idiot to want to turn into a woman and lose his privileges.

far more funding is spent on women’s healthcare in countries with public healthcare systems,

Could this have anything to do with the fact that women’s reproductive systems mean they have far more complex and expensive health care requirements? Remind me, which sex gives birth again? It’s feasible that a man could go his entire life without entering a hospital system. That is hardly feasible for women, considering the majority do give birth, usually necessitating a hospital stay, not to mention gyno/obstretic checks.

although men make the primary economic contribution to those systems.

Stats? Facts? Regardless of your inability to provide any evidence, perhaps the fact that men earn more has something to do with more of their tax being spent on healthcare for women.

The media is also opposed to men (Nathanson and Young)

Incomplete citation. Year of publication? Peer reviewed? Critique? All you have done here is make a largely unqualified blanket statement. In what way is the media opposed to men? Surely you aren’t suggesting that pornography (the world’s largest media) oppresses and exploits men rather than women?

as are the courts (Farrell)

The courts have a mandate that decisions are predicated on the best interests of the child. Read that again perhaps, because it isn’t “in the best interests of the woman”, it’s “the best interests of the child.”
If it just so happens that the woman is usually the primary caretaker of a child and it would be in the child’s best interests not to be separated from their primary caretaker, then you can hardly blame that on the woman, unless she and the father fought over who was going to take on the role of primary carer prior to the child’s birth. Any bias towards woman in child custody determinations are therefore only consequences, not fundamental.

and general social support systems (90% of the western homeless are male, at least).

Got any stats on that because I see plenty of homeless women on the streets, living less than a minute from a homeless shelter, I can assure you that there is no gender discrimination in homelessness. It’s looking pretty equivalent from what I see daily. I think the point you are trying to make (badly) is that there are more accommodation services for homeless women than there are for men. To that I say, most men without a regular fixed address end up in prison, where they certainly aren’t on the streets. Most women in the same situation have children and are thus given accommodation in family crisis centres. If these women didn’t have children, then there would significantly less options for them. Again, it doesn’t come down to their gender, it comes down to whether they are the ones with dependents in their care.

US males are required to register for the Draft

In what way does this make men better than women? In what way should women be blamed for this? Do men in power enforce this ruling or do women in power enforce it? What would you like women to do about it?

Women, on the other hand, certainly white middle class post-feminists, have acquired plenty of rights with no obligations.

Hmmm, I certainly wasn’t aware that white middle class women were exempt from paying tax or abiding by the law like anything other citizen. Wow. You must live in a woman’s Utopia.

Women don’t enjoy many privileges when it comes to divorce either Muzalon. Studies have shown that the only women who benefit from divorce are those married to wealthy men, which according to your very stats would be 1% of all women. The majority of women fair 73% less well off after divorce, while men fair 30% less well off. Do some unbiased reading once in a while and maybe you’d learn a factoid or two.

The rest of your post is some kind of self-aggrandizing drivel which is not worth addressing.

Muzalon have you decided what gender you are yet as you seem to contradict yourself alot or are still undecided as too which way to go ?

Michael said:

So you’re saying that men do enjoy privileges over women for the main part, but it’s only when they experience losses that they lose privilege? Geez, funny how that works, experiencing a loss and then losing privileges…hmmm

The point, which I thank you for helping to prove, is that men do enjoy a privileged position in society over women and this position is the norm.

Any man that says otherwise is simply a whiner with a chip on his shoulder who revels in bullshit victim status.

Men indeed enjoy privileged standing for the most part, certainly on a global basis. For example, a man’s testimony is worth more in Islamic law. This ‘Masculine Personal Sovereignty’ applies in Western societies, albeit to a much lesser extent, and only in some areas (principally pay), not all (or even most), and to men who are socially unrepresentative (Power Elites, not blacks, the poor, or the middle class – about 1% of males, if that). In other areas, women are privileged. For example, far more funding is spent on women’s healthcare in countries with public healthcare systems, although men make the primary economic contribution to those systems. The media is also opposed to men (Nathanson and Young), as are the courts (Farrell) and general social support systems (90% of the western homeless are male, at least). US males are required to register for the Draft, from which women remain exempt despite now enjoying responsible positions in law, politics and the media, showing that men retain the obligations of privilege, without enjoying exclusive privilege for the most part. Women, on the other hand, certainly white middle class post-feminists, have acquired plenty of rights with no obligations. These truths are just self-evident.

The issue of western Divorce that you fail to grasp is that men presently enjoy NO privileges in that area at all, so they do not ‘lose’ privilege by Divorce, they simply never enjoyed any in the post-feminist era. This has resulted in the vaunted Marriage Strike, where males refuse to marry rather than risk permanent economic losses.

So clearly, your Anglo-fag ramblings have proven little, except the fact you need to engage in serious study of men’s issues. Anglo-Saxon liberals like you have been taught to set women on pedestals unthinkingly: this is a function of the Puritanism underpinning the ailing Anglo-American world culture, which accords women intrinsic status because sex is an elusive commodity in a repressive, puritanical culture. Little wonder we Jews are leading the way in challenging the feminist pseudo-consensus, which even many western women increasingly revile.

I think it revealing that now that feminism has allowed men to experience what women have always – and still do – experience as the norm, some men just cannot hack it. You guys should learn to suck it up, women have had to put up with worse and for much longer. They’ve only received more equitable treatment for the past 25 – 30 years which is in the span of time is nothing more than a fart. And yet, you all act like bitches about it. Get a fucking grip.

So you’re saying that men do enjoy privileges over women for the main part, but it’s only when they experience losses that they lose privilege? Geez, funny how that works, experiencing a loss and then losing privileges…hmmm

The point, which I thank you for helping to prove, is that men do enjoy a privileged position in society over women and this position is the norm.

Any man that says otherwise is simply a whiner with a chip on his shoulder who revels in bullshit victim status.

Michael said:

A person has sent a postcard into http://www.postsecret.blogspot.com which says “I think life is easier for men”.

Frank (the site creator) has posted underneath this an email from a reader, which I shall take the liberty of pasting below for posterity (Frank deletes the postcards after one week).

All the male professional whiners on this site might want to have a read of it.

—–Email Message—–
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 10:10 PM
Subject: Life is easier

I am a medical student who recently heard a doctor who works with people who are going through gender reassignments. The (male) doctor said that as part of the pre-surgery counseling, he always asks the male-to-female patients if they are ready to give up their privileged-male status in society. He said the patients often come back to him after they have completed their transition into a female. They tell him that they didn’t realize how significant the privileged-male status is.

Very few of those people will get divorced, though, which is an area of life where ‘male privilege’ runs up very short. I also doubt many of them will be non-white or working class, further confounding variables in the mix.

A person has sent a postcard into http://www.postsecret.blogspot.com which says “I think life is easier for men”.

Frank (the site creator) has posted underneath this an email from a reader, which I shall take the liberty of pasting below for posterity (Frank deletes the postcards after one week).

All the male professional whiners on this site might want to have a read of it.

—–Email Message—–
Sent: Sunday, April 20, 2008 10:10 PM
Subject: Life is easier

I am a medical student who recently heard a doctor who works with people who are going through gender reassignments. The (male) doctor said that as part of the pre-surgery counseling, he always asks the male-to-female patients if they are ready to give up their privileged-male status in society. He said the patients often come back to him after they have completed their transition into a female. They tell him that they didn’t realize how significant the privileged-male status is.

Dick is better than jesus.

Evan said:

Yea that last guy was a traitor to his gender. He tried to sound all wise and shit, but he just sounded like an idiot. “I feel sorry for you”? Waht the fuck is up with that! And to tell the truth, I feel that most of the stuff on this site relates to the women in my life who are trying to outdo men or become “equal” yet still treated like a princess.

Once again, that traitor just gave up all his man points for his idiotic statements.

Some boys are still hanging onto the proverbial umbilical cord and any insult to women is an insult to Mummy.
They haven’t been around enough women to realize how screwed up they are in the head, yet.

Kelly B said:

On a site note:
These voice mails are pointless because:
1. Dick talks over most of them and you can’t even hear the whole thing. Very annoying Dick.
2. A lot of these stupid things listed I have ALSO seen or heard of MALES doing. What’s the deal with that? Like, just for one example, I know a lot of guys who have done dumb shit with cars (wreck their engine, hit someone else).
How do you explain this? How do you explain it when men do dumb-ass shit?

Shut up you dopey wienie wallet.. Women have more accidents per mile than men. More women cause fatal crashes than men.

NHTSA … shows Men drive 70% more than women but women cause 37% of the accidents of fatal crashes.
over 2.42% higher fatal crashes per mile than men.

Female pilot crash statistics show that they are likely to crash 6 times more than males pilots on average at much earlier point in their careers which raise the overall rates per flyer miles to about 12 times more accident prone. BEetween 1983 and 1997 there were 144 females crashes and 287 male crashes. There are over a 100,000 male pilots compared to a few thousand females pilots.

Mishandling aircraft kinetics was the most common error of pilots of both genders and was noted more often in female pilots’ crashes (81% vs. 48%) The rates climbs much higher than this considering male pilots outnumber female pilots by well over 100,000.

Flying with affirmative action pilots? Oh hell no

Kelly B said:
There is NO EVIDENCE men are smarter or better, or whatever else you want to dream up, than women.

The sooner you realize it, the sooner you can move on with your life and stop being so pathetic.

Denial ain’t no river in Egypt bitch. You know that men are smarter but refuse to accept it. The truth will set you free but only if you accept the truth.

A woman lying about rape to get her way? That NEVER happens!

Actually it was a lot more than that. It’s kind of ironic I am studying for my Social Work exam right now and actually HAVE EVIDENCE in front of me. Not debating issues if you don’t have ANY SOURCES!

From: U.S. Department of Labor
Bureau of Labor Statistics
Occupational Outlook Handbook

Work Environment
Social workers *usually spend most of their time in an office or residential facility,* but they also may travel locally to visit clients, meet with service providers, or attend meetings. Some may meet with clients in one of several offices within a local area.

Employment Change
Employment of child, family and school social workers is expected to grow by 19 percent, which is faster than the average for all occupations. *One of the major contributing factors is the rise in the elderly population.* Social workers, particularly family social workers, will be needed to assist in finding the best care for the aging and to support their families. Furthermore, demand for school social workers will increase and lead to more jobs as efforts are expanded to respond to *rising student enrollments* as well as the continued emphasis on *integrating disabled children* into the general school population.

Now go play with your dollies, you useless fat hag.

-Rawkstah

Let me see if I understand this. Kelly tells us who smart she is. Yet, Dick has said in plain sight on this URL NO WOMEN, yet she posts here more than anyone. She not only isn’t very smart, she also pays no attention to any sort of social order.

Let us examine just how smart women, and social workers are. In Texas, someone called in, probably a hoax, and said she had been raped by an old man. So, a female judge, I think it was, ordered all 436 kids taken from the parents. Even when they couldn’t find the bogus girl, she ordered them kept.

And, the social worker in charge also reported a young girl in Waco who claimed she had been raped by Koresh.. No matter that the girl’s father reported that when she said Koresh raped her, she was with her father in another state.

Another name for social worker is man-hater. All major civilizations had provisions for women who had a psychotic fear and hatred for all men. They called those refuges ‘convents’ and that is where they put those sick, twisted women.

Today, we take women like that, send them to Women’s Studies, call them Social Workers, and let them take charge of children.

The Huns are coming, and my guess is they won’t be really nice to man-hating Social Workers.

Yea that last guy was a traitor to his gender. He tried to sound all wise and shit, but he just sounded like an idiot. “I feel sorry for you”? Waht the fuck is up with that! And to tell the truth, I feel that most of the stuff on this site relates to the women in my life who are trying to outdo men or become “equal” yet still treated like a princess.

Once again, that traitor just gave up all his man points for his idiotic statements.

Who’s that whipped piece of asshole that keeps calling? He sounds like a man but he’s arguing that women aren’t what this website claims. Fuck that noise. What a bunch of cockadooky.

Holy cow. Having an age moment. Just saw the trailer for the new Indiana Jones movie, and apparently it’s been 19 years since the Last Crusade movie was released.

Nineteen years.

Yikes.

Dawn said:

Why are so many men on here so angry? Yeesh, what did I say to piss you off so much?

You posted here, and continue to post here. Now get the fuck out.

Maybe he wants his brain disembodied, with all thinking and reasoning functions preserved intact, with the removal of annoying and debilitating lower-brain-functions……Coooooooool…………..

I doubt he’s a marine, he’s too much of an unorganized clusterfuck.

@ jarbrain – Out of curiosity, is that a twist on jarhead? Been wondering about that.

Dr. Phil said:

Yup, and it’s funny. Poor next generation… Kids are being taught by their women teachers that women like nice respectful guys who treat them with dignity and respect, but we all know that when they get older, they’ll discover the shocking truth. Women LIKE being treated like garbage, a piece of meat, just a little girl inferior to men and needing protecting. Don’t ask me why… I like being treated with common sense of respect (I give it to you and expect it in return most days) The women online talking about wanting to be treated as equals are fat losers who don’t get asked out on dates constantly by mr. muscles. The hot ones who have the whole world given to them because they’re hot, complain a hell of a lot less about their special circumstances. And the only thing women are better than men at? BEING WHORES.

thank you and good day to ya

Dick cites that femmes are disorganized and make lousy employees. Well, 5 will get you 10 that converts to crappy homemaker. You have to have your act together to take care of kids and run the ranch. It’s hard to find looks and competence and brains. Trust that the few and the proud who have bagged such and dragged it home have eluded everyone and rolled their mountains shut to prying eyes.
Gotta set the standard. Glams are expensive and conceited and later lay out to the luxury pasture.
Clipboard that gal! Put up a flowchart (next to hers, ofcourse!). Make her give an account of herself and the money she spends.
This needs to be nav’d out by contract before you find yourself waste deep in this burensome shit.

Muzalon said:

L said:

Kelly B said:

Well if I supposedly cannot add anything useful, then what’s your excuse for not being able to add anything useful?

I’m adding something, it’s just beyond your grasp. It’s called “comedy” and it’s one of the other things men are better at than women. You see, when a woman wants to insult a guy, she has a few standard insults. She shouts “You’re gay!” Then she shouts “You don’t have a girlfriend!” At least males can come up with interesting and entertaining insults, such as “Your father was a hamster and your mother smelled of elderberries!” No woman could come up with that. If you gave a thousand a monkeys with a thousand typewriters infinite time, they’d have Shakespeare’s plays done on Monday, but only if they were male. If they’re female, all they’ll have is a treatise on which nail polish to use, and even then it’d be wrong because no one gives a shit.

Women lack imagination, the first cousin of humour. They are also fat bastards!

Women create some of the choicest dark comedy I’ve ever seen-probably why they can’t shake el diablo.
Oscar Wilde was a fat bastard who’d say anything to get his mud flaps hoisted. Did you ever see that freak? I’d rather look at the laundry mat on Saturday morning in the middle of July!

Muzalon said:

Kelly B said:

Muzalon said:

Kelly B said:

How about you get an education and then come back and see if your explanations actually are explanations at all.

What education have YOU got? A degree in psychology and flower-arranging? Psychology has been trashed by sociobiology, as founded by Edward O Wilson of Harvard: it is no longer a credible subject. For example, crime is best explained by biology (greater male aggression – violent criminals are nearly all male) and sociology (nearly all criminals are also members of the underclass, for whom crime is ‘normal’). Psychology is boolsheet: it has no effect on reducing crime among underclass males because the causes of crime are biological and subcultural.

Psychology major and an honours in sociology so far.
A lot of what you just said can be disproved or explained a lot better. I refuse to debate issues anymore without scholarly evidence of your claims.

Check any crime figures, anywhere, ever: young, poor males commit nearly all violent crime. Check out Professor Hans Eysenck’s Decline and Fall of the Freudian Empire: he gives ample evidence there that psychological counselling has had zero effect in reducing delinquent behaviour, wherever it has been tried. In fact, psychotherapy does not cure people in any other sphere, either.

Soft-science academics have had little effect on anything – despite all their research, the world is still in an atrocious state. Academics also have mediocre IQs, and tend to have working class backgrounds.

ah,ah,ah-young males have all their job opportunity gobbled by women who are trying to support illegitamate children in single parent homes.
Dick says this over and over and over: single parent homes = dysfunct, criminal derelicts.
If you’re mom did work and try, you’ve got two roads at 18 at the end of her ‘State Pack’; will it be prison, or the military for you?

Muzalon said:

Ostrich Melee said:

The women coming to this site to “prove men wrong” can continue to blab on about how smart they are, and how all the men they know are sex crazed, semi-retards, but it won’t change the fact that men have been the dominant sex for the past 200,000 so years, and after 200,000 years of trying, the only way they’ve managed to achieve a crude sense of equality was by nagging men for it.

Plus, men earn more. If men are so dumb, how come they continue to earn far more than women?

…because the State is hitting them upside for Child Support! Ok-I’m pulling out 2 specimens so far: ’skullvoid’ & ‘asshole’.
Why is the State so involved? I personally believe that women via ‘Friend of the Court’ should have to be audited for how a man’s support funds are appropriated. You’ve got 2 scavengers hard at work here, Gentlemen.
Pass that legislation.

Kelly B said:

Muzalon said:

Kelly B said:

Ostrich Melee said:

Kelly B said:

Muzalon said:

Ostrich Melee said:

The women coming to this site to “prove men wrong” can continue to blab on about how smart they are, and how all the men they know are sex crazed, semi-retards, but it won’t change the fact that men have been the dominant sex for the past 200,000 so years, and after 200,000 years of trying, the only way they’ve managed to achieve a crude sense of equality was by nagging men for it.

Plus, men earn more. If men are so dumb, how come they continue to earn far more than women?

INEQUALITY! This is a patriarchal society. Has nothing to do with intelligence. AND I never said men were dumb. Grow the fuck up.

First off, i didn’t mention you. I mentioned women in general. Get over yourself.
Men have been dominant because of inequality? No shit. Of course its a patriarchal society. It wouldn’t be unless men were the superior race. If women were superior, they would have asserted their dominace thousands of years ago.

Once again, no evidence…
Go get an education, then come talk to me. Okay?

An education like yours, in Polytechnic sociology? Don’t make me laugh. Check out Professor Glenn Wilson’s (he is a Professor at the University of London) Great Sex Divide: he shows mythical matriarchal civilizations like that of the Amazons never existed. With benefit of footnotes. Women were dominant at the hunter-gatherer phase of human history: when settled civilization began, their power crumbled. Daniel Amneus (another Professor, incidentally) explains this in the Garbage Generation. Do these men need lessons in thinking from a budding social worker, you commie shit-heel?

It’s true that women had the power during that time frame, BECAUSE they gave birth and were the only KNOWN parent to the child and were respected for that. Men started trying to gain power shortly after… which was based on nothing more than money and power… sad really. Too bad men cared more about sex, money, and power. But they don’t. Owell.

huh. Go back that far, you’ve got women still feeding by the breast. In fact, (even though I’m sure they used sacks made of intestine, goat’s skin, something once in awhile to give other milk to human infants) why was there such a break-away from giving infant’s ‘nature’s finest’ after WWII?
Stock holders? Suddenly, human babies became lab rats, suffering from every infection you can think of because they were being deprived of free immunity from mom. Mom’s body got trashed because all the implements God put there to whip her figure back into shape were taken away! Anyway, I’m in this area because I’m convicted that woman I wired more animalistic and primal than males. Just read around in here, you will notice their reaction when threatened is verbally violent. A wise man (or genuine family man) recognizes this as misplaced nest defense. Shouldn’t the highest young-bearer on the planet destroy anything that threatens her infant? Excuse me: m-a-m-m-a-l.
Everything is complete disaster because women will not admidt they don’t understand their own wiring.
But-if they do admidt it…you shouldn’t act like a bum.

Women with dignity and respect is fairy tale fantasm.

Kelly B said:

Sorry, I could not resist this one.

But surely women have better self-control than men? After all, women are better than men, right?

BUT, if you would like an explanation for why men score higher it could most likely be because men have more of an opportunity to attend university (and recieve other such types of higher education) than women because they do not have to worry about such things as giving birth and childrearing, etc.

These days, more women than men attend universities as a result of affirmative action. That’s right, fewer men attend university, yet they score higher than women. If men are not better than women, why should women be treated as the inferior sex?

Yet, you still make the same claim, as if nothing has changed, just like the wage gap argument. Have the integrity to update your argument with current reality.

Stop being so ignorant… seriously. Don’t argue or put women down unless it’s based on something more factual…

There is NO EVIDENCE men are smarter or better, or whatever else you want to dream up, than women.

The evidence does not get more factual than this.

The sooner you realize it, the sooner you can move on with your life and stop being so pathetic.

Your insults are the only pathetic thing here.

Kelly B said:
I honestly hope you are not like this is real life… if so then you will have trouble finding a woman you will be happy with for the rest of your life… I am sincere in saying this and I am not trying to put you down. I just think you should really reconsider a lot of your views. If you want to act macho on this site then fine, but I hope someday you meet someone and treat her with dignity and respect.

Trouble finding a woman? Many of us are turning them away. Do you know why? Because today’s woman is not worth the risk. She has socially, fiscally and legally priced herself out of the market.

Remember the saying ‘a woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle’? The reverse is far more true.

Have fun living the single life, Kelly. I know we men will genuinely enjoy it more than you and your ilk will.

Kelly B said:

OKAY:

First of all you don’t know my IQ… I don’t even know my IQ… I have never had an actual IQ test done (except for when I was 10 and I’m not even sure if that was a complete one or not). I said my IQ is 124 according to those dinky websites which dont even actually measure “intelligence” in order to see what your IQ is you have to go to an actual Psychologist or Psychiatrist…
FUCK! So shut the hell up already because you have ALREADY proven I am way more intelligent THAN YOU!

Hahaha!

Right, he’ll never come close to your own book…oh wait.

Dick Masterson said:

Samantaha Lo said:

How about them shitty book sale numbers? Don’t lose any more hair over it dick.

I doubt her children are spared that sarcastic attitude.

-Dick

What a witty comeback no wonder you managed to climb to number 27,000 on the amazon best selling list. Thats a real accomplishment.

Kelly B said:

Muzalon said:

Hey, Kelly, what kind of secondary school did you go to? Not private or selective, I bet.

I went to public school…
BUT it was the most prestigious school in the city because it offered university level courses.

You suffer from status anxiety, don’t you?

Panda said:

Kelly B said:

I need evidence that water is wet. Name your sources!

I’m in Socal, and I don’t think there is a high school here for 70 miles that doesnt have University level classes.

Tommy Edison only went to elementery school, and Harry Truman never went to college. Harry could even speak latin.

Q: Would they need an education before they could talk to the likes of you?

A: No. They would need their heads examined.

And William Blake, one of England’s greatest poets, also a fantastic theologian and artist, never attended university.

Why are so many men on here so angry? Yeesh, what did I say to piss you off so much?

Leave it.

Dawn said:

Dr. Phil said:

Dawn said:

Why is it you think women like to be treated like garbage?

Just look at how women keep coming here planning to spend the rest of their lives arguing with men. They loooooooooooooooooooooooooooove the thrill of the fight, the challenge of breaking someone bigger than them down. That’s why women love the asshole, that and because he’ll fuck their brains out.

I don’t think every woman that comes to this site came her for an argument. I came here out of curiosity, to see what sort of chauvanistic theories Dick had, and what sort of evidence/proof he had to back them up. I’m actually quite impressed to be honest, he presents some pretty good arguments, but many are a matter of opinion rather than hard facts. But I like this site, I’m always up for a good discussion, I didn’t come here to scream and curse at everyone who believes this stuff like some of the women have been doing….its clearly not getting them anywhere…

Why the hell should i give a fuck what you’re here for. I told you how it is in the reality. Women love the guy who’s got money and will rip their asses up. Take it or leave it.

so I’m guessing she’s too ugly to do porn. Has grand ideals to be a hard working feminist pulling in a huge salary. Then few years into the job, she realizes she wants to be a stay at home mom, quits, and finds some man too leech off of as usual…

Kelly B said:

I need evidence that water is wet. Name your sources!

I’m in Socal, and I don’t think there is a high school here for 70 miles that doesnt have University level classes.

Tommy Edison only went to elementery school, and Harry Truman never went to college. Harry could even speak latin.

Q: Would they need an education before they could talk to the likes of you?

A: No. They would need their heads examined.

“There,” said the Mayor: “That’s that!”

So civilization IS inherently patriarchal. Ho hum.

Muzalon said:

Hey, Kelly, what kind of secondary school did you go to? Not private or selective, I bet.

I went to public school…
BUT it was the most prestigious school in the city because it offered university level courses.

Muzalon said:

Kelly B said:

Ostrich Melee said:

Kelly B said:

Muzalon said:

Ostrich Melee said:

The women coming to this site to “prove men wrong” can continue to blab on about how smart they are, and how all the men they know are sex crazed, semi-retards, but it won’t change the fact that men have been the dominant sex for the past 200,000 so years, and after 200,000 years of trying, the only way they’ve managed to achieve a crude sense of equality was by nagging men for it.

Plus, men earn more. If men are so dumb, how come they continue to earn far more than women?

INEQUALITY! This is a patriarchal society. Has nothing to do with intelligence. AND I never said men were dumb. Grow the fuck up.

First off, i didn’t mention you. I mentioned women in general. Get over yourself.
Men have been dominant because of inequality? No shit. Of course its a patriarchal society. It wouldn’t be unless men were the superior race. If women were superior, they would have asserted their dominace thousands of years ago.

Once again, no evidence…
Go get an education, then come talk to me. Okay?

An education like yours, in Polytechnic sociology? Don’t make me laugh. Check out Professor Glenn Wilson’s (he is a Professor at the University of London) Great Sex Divide: he shows mythical matriarchal civilizations like that of the Amazons never existed. With benefit of footnotes. Women were dominant at the hunter-gatherer phase of human history: when settled civilization began, their power crumbled. Daniel Amneus (another Professor, incidentally) explains this in the Garbage Generation. Do these men need lessons in thinking from a budding social worker, you commie shit-heel?

It’s true that women had the power during that time frame, BECAUSE they gave birth and were the only KNOWN parent to the child and were respected for that. Men started trying to gain power shortly after… which was based on nothing more than money and power… sad really. Too bad men cared more about sex, money, and power. But they don’t. Owell.

Kelly B said:
Once again, no evidence…
Go get an education, then come talk to me. Okay?

This would be like someone telling me that sharks kill people, and me demanding evidence. Are you really going to try to argue against the fact that human civilization has been, and still is, male dominant? It’s common fucking knowledge. If you have an actual counterpoint to my argument, I would love to hear it. Because all you’re doing right now is hiding behind pointless demands.

Quote of the day:

manhole said:

FUCK! So shut the hell up already because you have ALREADY proven I am way more intelligent THAN YOU!

Hey, Kelly, what kind of secondary school did you go to? Not private or selective, I bet.

Kelly B said:

Ostrich Melee said:

Kelly B said:

Muzalon said:

Ostrich Melee said:

The women coming to this site to “prove men wrong” can continue to blab on about how smart they are, and how all the men they know are sex crazed, semi-retards, but it won’t change the fact that men have been the dominant sex for the past 200,000 so years, and after 200,000 years of trying, the only way they’ve managed to achieve a crude sense of equality was by nagging men for it.

Plus, men earn more. If men are so dumb, how come they continue to earn far more than women?

INEQUALITY! This is a patriarchal society. Has nothing to do with intelligence. AND I never said men were dumb. Grow the fuck up.

First off, i didn’t mention you. I mentioned women in general. Get over yourself.
Men have been dominant because of inequality? No shit. Of course its a patriarchal society. It wouldn’t be unless men were the superior race. If women were superior, they would have asserted their dominace thousands of years ago.

Once again, no evidence…
Go get an education, then come talk to me. Okay?

An education like yours, in Polytechnic sociology? Don’t make me laugh. Check out Professor Glenn Wilson’s (he is a Professor at the University of London) Great Sex Divide: he shows mythical matriarchal civilizations like that of the Amazons never existed. With benefit of footnotes. Women were dominant at the hunter-gatherer phase of human history: when settled civilization began, their power crumbled. Daniel Amneus (another Professor, incidentally) explains this in the Garbage Generation. Do these men need lessons in thinking from a budding social worker, you commie shit-heel?

Ostrich Melee said:

Kelly B said:

Muzalon said:

Ostrich Melee said:

The women coming to this site to “prove men wrong” can continue to blab on about how smart they are, and how all the men they know are sex crazed, semi-retards, but it won’t change the fact that men have been the dominant sex for the past 200,000 so years, and after 200,000 years of trying, the only way they’ve managed to achieve a crude sense of equality was by nagging men for it.

Plus, men earn more. If men are so dumb, how come they continue to earn far more than women?

INEQUALITY! This is a patriarchal society. Has nothing to do with intelligence. AND I never said men were dumb. Grow the fuck up.

First off, i didn’t mention you. I mentioned women in general. Get over yourself.
Men have been dominant because of inequality? No shit. Of course its a patriarchal society. It wouldn’t be unless men were the superior race. If women were superior, they would have asserted their dominace thousands of years ago.

Once again, no evidence…
Go get an education, then come talk to me. Okay?

Muzalon said:

Dawn said:

Rawkstah said:

Kelly B said:

I gurantee I will have a well paying job as soon as I graduate with my Social Work degree.

A “job” entering data into a few empty lines on software (written by men on computers designed and maintained by) so that stupid whores can collect welfare (paid by men’s taxes) for being a) pregnant b) single-mothers or c) old and useless to everyone.

What was Social Work 100 years ago? Helping orphan girls find husbands so they wouldn’t end up as diseased whores. What is it now? Making sure we have plenty of diseased whores having kids and keeping old women in pills. Hoo-Rah.

-Rawkstah

I don’t understand why you would think that all women have clerical jobs this day-in-age….women are everywhere in the workforce

Deep-sea welders? Don’t think so. Not everywhere.

What about Infantry Soldier….?

Kelly B said:

Ostrich Melee said:

The women coming to this site to “prove men wrong” can continue to blab on about how smart they are, and how all the men they know are sex crazed, semi-retards, but it won’t change the fact that men have been the dominant sex for the past 200,000 so years, and after 200,000 years of trying, the only way they’ve managed to achieve a crude sense of equality was by nagging men for it.

Once again, based on NO EVIDENCE!

No evidence? How about the fucking history of human civilization?

Rawkstah said:

Kelly B said:

I gurantee I will have a well paying job as soon as I graduate with my Social Work degree.

A “job” entering data into a few empty lines on software (written by men on computers designed and maintained by) so that stupid whores can collect welfare (paid by men’s taxes) for being a) pregnant b) single-mothers or c) old and useless to everyone.

What was Social Work 100 years ago? Helping orphan girls find husbands so they wouldn’t end up as diseased whores. What is it now? Making sure we have plenty of diseased whores having kids and keeping old women in pills. Hoo-Rah.

-Rawkstah

Actually it was a lot more than that. It’s kind of ironic I am studying for my Social Work exam right now and actually HAVE EVIDENCE in front of me. Not debating issues if you don’t have ANY SOURCES!

Kelly B said:

Muzalon said:

Ostrich Melee said:

The women coming to this site to “prove men wrong” can continue to blab on about how smart they are, and how all the men they know are sex crazed, semi-retards, but it won’t change the fact that men have been the dominant sex for the past 200,000 so years, and after 200,000 years of trying, the only way they’ve managed to achieve a crude sense of equality was by nagging men for it.

Plus, men earn more. If men are so dumb, how come they continue to earn far more than women?

INEQUALITY! This is a patriarchal society. Has nothing to do with intelligence. AND I never said men were dumb. Grow the fuck up.

First off, i didn’t mention you. I mentioned women in general. Get over yourself.
Men have been dominant because of inequality? No shit. Of course its a patriarchal society. It wouldn’t be unless men were the superior race. If women were superior, they would have asserted their dominace thousands of years ago.

Dawn said:

Rawkstah said:

Kelly B said:

I gurantee I will have a well paying job as soon as I graduate with my Social Work degree.

A “job” entering data into a few empty lines on software (written by men on computers designed and maintained by) so that stupid whores can collect welfare (paid by men’s taxes) for being a) pregnant b) single-mothers or c) old and useless to everyone.

What was Social Work 100 years ago? Helping orphan girls find husbands so they wouldn’t end up as diseased whores. What is it now? Making sure we have plenty of diseased whores having kids and keeping old women in pills. Hoo-Rah.

-Rawkstah

I don’t understand why you would think that all women have clerical jobs this day-in-age….women are everywhere in the workforce

Deep-sea welders? Don’t think so. Not everywhere.

Rawkstah said:

Kelly B said:

I gurantee I will have a well paying job as soon as I graduate with my Social Work degree.

A “job” entering data into a few empty lines on software (written by men on computers designed and maintained by) so that stupid whores can collect welfare (paid by men’s taxes) for being a) pregnant b) single-mothers or c) old and useless to everyone.

What was Social Work 100 years ago? Helping orphan girls find husbands so they wouldn’t end up as diseased whores. What is it now? Making sure we have plenty of diseased whores having kids and keeping old women in pills. Hoo-Rah.

-Rawkstah

I don’t understand why you would think that all women have clerical jobs this day-in-age….women are everywhere in the workforce

Kelly B said:

I gurantee I will have a well paying job as soon as I graduate with my Social Work degree.

A “job” entering data into a few empty lines on software (written by men on computers designed and maintained by) so that stupid whores can collect welfare (paid by men’s taxes) for being a) pregnant b) single-mothers or c) old and useless to everyone.

What was Social Work 100 years ago? Helping orphan girls find husbands so they wouldn’t end up as diseased whores. What is it now? Making sure we have plenty of diseased whores having kids and keeping old women in pills. Hoo-Rah.

-Rawkstah

Dr. Phil said:

Dawn said:

Why is it you think women like to be treated like garbage?

Just look at how women keep coming here planning to spend the rest of their lives arguing with men. They loooooooooooooooooooooooooooove the thrill of the fight, the challenge of breaking someone bigger than them down. That’s why women love the asshole, that and because he’ll fuck their brains out.

I don’t think every woman that comes to this site came her for an argument. I came here out of curiosity, to see what sort of chauvanistic theories Dick had, and what sort of evidence/proof he had to back them up. I’m actually quite impressed to be honest, he presents some pretty good arguments, but many are a matter of opinion rather than hard facts. But I like this site, I’m always up for a good discussion, I didn’t come here to scream and curse at everyone who believes this stuff like some of the women have been doing….its clearly not getting them anywhere…

Ostrich Melee said:

The women coming to this site to “prove men wrong” can continue to blab on about how smart they are, and how all the men they know are sex crazed, semi-retards, but it won’t change the fact that men have been the dominant sex for the past 200,000 so years, and after 200,000 years of trying, the only way they’ve managed to achieve a crude sense of equality was by nagging men for it.

Once again, based on NO EVIDENCE!

son of the suns said:

If this skullvoid had any self esteem she wouldn’t be begging for acceptance from this site.

She has no career future because social workers are going to be shot en masse like criminals and no future love because she chose a pathetic mate who she’ll get tired of too late.

Begging for exceptance? I don’t need acceptance from you. I have acceptance from REAL MEN. Thanks anyways though.
I chose a pathetic mate? You really are an idiot. Go get some counseling.

Muzalon said:

Ostrich Melee said:

The women coming to this site to “prove men wrong” can continue to blab on about how smart they are, and how all the men they know are sex crazed, semi-retards, but it won’t change the fact that men have been the dominant sex for the past 200,000 so years, and after 200,000 years of trying, the only way they’ve managed to achieve a crude sense of equality was by nagging men for it.

Plus, men earn more. If men are so dumb, how come they continue to earn far more than women?

INEQUALITY! This is a patriarchal society. Has nothing to do with intelligence. AND I never said men were dumb. Grow the fuck up.

Muzalon said:

Kelly, you might find this useful sometime in the near future:

http://www.mcdonalds.co.uk/?f=y

I already have a job, but thanks.

Muzalon said:

Kelly B said:

Oh not, not Bill Gates. I’d rather die then become anything like him.

I gurantee I will have a well paying job as soon as I graduate with my Social Work degree. I am smart, I have always been smart. I have had straight A’s since Elementary school. I know people with BSc degrees and can’t find jobs, so what is your point again?

Liberal arts degrees are better than any other degrees out there… I am glad I know the things that I know so I don’t walk the earth being as ignorant as you… because THAT would be sad.

I also do not think I have finger painted since kindergarten, so you may as well leave kindergarten out of this conversation, it does not appear to ve relevant.

If someone wants to have a genuine academic debate with me then I will debate with you. Otherwise I’m done because all you men know how to do is talk about “pussy” and say things that are not relevant or even factually grounded in any real evidence. I do not have time or patience for such foolishness anymore.

You are not intelligent enough to be the new Bill Gates – stop kidding yourself. Your IQ is not high enough.

OKAY:

First of all you don’t know my IQ… I don’t even know my IQ… I have never had an actual IQ test done (except for when I was 10 and I’m not even sure if that was a complete one or not). I said my IQ is 124 according to those dinky websites which dont even actually measure “intelligence” in order to see what your IQ is you have to go to an actual Psychologist or Psychiatrist…
FUCK! So shut the hell up already because you have ALREADY proven I am way more intelligent THAN YOU!

Ostrich Melee said:

The women coming to this site to “prove men wrong” can continue to blab on about how smart they are, and how all the men they know are sex crazed, semi-retards, but it won’t change the fact that men have been the dominant sex for the past 200,000 so years, and after 200,000 years of trying, the only way they’ve managed to achieve a crude sense of equality was by nagging men for it.

Plus, men earn more. If men are so dumb, how come they continue to earn far more than women?

Dawn said:

Why is it you think women like to be treated like garbage?

Just look at how women keep coming here planning to spend the rest of their lives arguing with men. They loooooooooooooooooooooooooooove the thrill of the fight, the challenge of breaking someone bigger than them down. That’s why women love the asshole, that and because he’ll fuck their brains out.

If this skullvoid had any self esteem she wouldn’t be begging for acceptance from this site.

She has no career future because social workers are going to be shot en masse like criminals and no future love because she chose a pathetic mate who she’ll get tired of too late.

Seriously, of all the people to complain about making things up…ehehe.

Pot calling the kettle black.

The women coming to this site to “prove men wrong” can continue to blab on about how smart they are, and how all the men they know are sex crazed, semi-retards, but it won’t change the fact that men have been the dominant sex for the past 200,000 so years, and after 200,000 years of trying, the only way they’ve managed to achieve a crude sense of equality was by nagging men for it.

Kelly, you might find this useful sometime in the near future:

http://www.mcdonalds.co.uk/?f=y

Kelly B said:

Oh not, not Bill Gates. I’d rather die then become anything like him.

I gurantee I will have a well paying job as soon as I graduate with my Social Work degree. I am smart, I have always been smart. I have had straight A’s since Elementary school. I know people with BSc degrees and can’t find jobs, so what is your point again?

Liberal arts degrees are better than any other degrees out there… I am glad I know the things that I know so I don’t walk the earth being as ignorant as you… because THAT would be sad.

I also do not think I have finger painted since kindergarten, so you may as well leave kindergarten out of this conversation, it does not appear to ve relevant.

If someone wants to have a genuine academic debate with me then I will debate with you. Otherwise I’m done because all you men know how to do is talk about “pussy” and say things that are not relevant or even factually grounded in any real evidence. I do not have time or patience for such foolishness anymore.

You are not intelligent enough to be the new Bill Gates – stop kidding yourself. Your IQ is not high enough.

Oh not, not Bill Gates. I’d rather die then become anything like him.

I gurantee I will have a well paying job as soon as I graduate with my Social Work degree. I am smart, I have always been smart. I have had straight A’s since Elementary school. I know people with BSc degrees and can’t find jobs, so what is your point again?

Liberal arts degrees are better than any other degrees out there… I am glad I know the things that I know so I don’t walk the earth being as ignorant as you… because THAT would be sad.

I also do not think I have finger painted since kindergarten, so you may as well leave kindergarten out of this conversation, it does not appear to ve relevant.

If someone wants to have a genuine academic debate with me then I will debate with you. Otherwise I’m done because all you men know how to do is talk about “pussy” and say things that are not relevant or even factually grounded in any real evidence. I do not have time or patience for such foolishness anymore.

Kelly B said:

“The smartest people never went to school or dropped out in middle school. The most school they’d ever get is a few semesters at a college. Only a fool would gauge intelligence by the amount of organized education one has”

Like I said,
not debating the issue without scholarly evidence because anyone can sit here and make stuff up.

Bill Gates dropped out of school and he’s a helluva lot smarter (and richer!) than you’ll ever be, with your useless degree in finger-painting.

Quite aside from which, aren’t soft-science and liberal arts Graduates all earning two cents an hour as there is such a surplus of their asses?

Joke: What did the liberal arts graduate say to the customer?

“Do you want fries with that?”

Panda said:

I didn’t make up Samuel Clemens.

Do you think you are intelligent? Why?

She does not seem intelligent. An IQ of 124 is very mediocre, by Ashkenazi Jewish standards.

I didn’t make up Samuel Clemens.

Do you think you are intelligent? Why?

“The smartest people never went to school or dropped out in middle school. The most school they’d ever get is a few semesters at a college. Only a fool would gauge intelligence by the amount of organized education one has”

Like I said,
not debating the issue without scholarly evidence because anyone can sit here and make stuff up.

studioline said:

Dr. Phil said:

Yup, and it’s funny. Poor next generation… Kids are being taught by their women teachers that women like nice respectful guys who treat them with dignity and respect, but we all know that when they get older, they’ll discover the shocking truth. Women LIKE being treated like garbage, a piece of meat, just a little girl inferior to men and needing protecting. Don’t ask me why… I like being treated with common sense of respect (I give it to you and expect it in return most days) The women online talking about wanting to be treated as equals are fat losers who don’t get asked out on dates constantly by mr. muscles. The hot ones who have the whole world given to them because they’re hot, complain a hell of a lot less about their special circumstances. And the only thing women are better than men at? BEING WHORES.

thank you and good day to ya

HaHa, Hey Dr Phil

“Brandon” thinks that if all guys were “nice” there would be a chance to finally score. Kelly B. wants a bad boy, but for some misterious reason she feels she would not stand a chance of interesting a man like that, which pisses her off. A man like that doesn’t want her pussy because it’s all she can offer, and that’s not enough, that’s just being a whore. She studies psychology to find answers where she is missing, but won’t ever find them there and more she tries not to be, more she is turning into a whore she doesn’t want to be. Women want to be respected, they just pursue a wrong idea how to get that respect.

A “bad boy?” what in the hell are you talking about.
I have a guy anyways so you may as well stop talking about my “pussy” now.

Kelly B said:

Muzalon said:

Kelly B said:

How about you get an education and then come back and see if your explanations actually are explanations at all.

What education have YOU got? A degree in psychology and flower-arranging? Psychology has been trashed by sociobiology, as founded by Edward O Wilson of Harvard: it is no longer a credible subject. For example, crime is best explained by biology (greater male aggression – violent criminals are nearly all male) and sociology (nearly all criminals are also members of the underclass, for whom crime is ‘normal’). Psychology is boolsheet: it has no effect on reducing crime among underclass males because the causes of crime are biological and subcultural.

Psychology major and an honours in sociology so far.
A lot of what you just said can be disproved or explained a lot better. I refuse to debate issues anymore without scholarly evidence of your claims.

…what she said translates to NO DEGREE. She has no degree.

Muzalon said:

Kelly B said:

Muzalon said:

Kelly B said:

How about you get an education and then come back and see if your explanations actually are explanations at all.

What education have YOU got? A degree in psychology and flower-arranging? Psychology has been trashed by sociobiology, as founded by Edward O Wilson of Harvard: it is no longer a credible subject. For example, crime is best explained by biology (greater male aggression – violent criminals are nearly all male) and sociology (nearly all criminals are also members of the underclass, for whom crime is ‘normal’). Psychology is boolsheet: it has no effect on reducing crime among underclass males because the causes of crime are biological and subcultural.

Psychology major and an honours in sociology so far.
A lot of what you just said can be disproved or explained a lot better. I refuse to debate issues anymore without scholarly evidence of your claims.

Check any crime figures, anywhere, ever: young, poor males commit nearly all violent crime. Check out Professor Hans Eysenck’s Decline and Fall of the Freudian Empire: he gives ample evidence there that psychological counselling has had zero effect in reducing delinquent behaviour, wherever it has been tried. In fact, psychotherapy does not cure people in any other sphere, either.

Soft-science academics have had little effect on anything – despite all their research, the world is still in an atrocious state. Academics also have mediocre IQs, and tend to have working class backgrounds.

The smartest people never went to school or dropped out in middle school. The most school they’d ever get is a few semesters at a college. Only a fool would gauge intelligence by the amount of organized education one has.

Keb said:

BrokenJohnny has more education in his little toe than you have in that whole head of yours.

Why can’t men be the dominant sex? Why can’t they be great leaders? Why can’t we women just stand proud behind them and be their biggest fans and give them back the respect they deserve? I don’t understand why you want to fight it.

She doesn’t know either, she is just confused, that’s the point. She just hopes to find answers in psychology books. The funny-sad part is that all the answers she is seeking could be writen on 10 pages of text. Becasue a single psychology book is much longer than that and there are many psychology books it only means the answers can not be there. And when after many years of study, she realizes she didn’t find them there, she will feel cheated, and she will blame men for it ofcourse. Which all together disables her to stand behind men who are leaders.

To Keb-

Keb said:

BrokenJohnny has more education in his little toe than you have in that whole head of yours.

Why can’t men be the dominant sex? Why can’t they be great leaders? Why can’t we women just stand proud behind them and be their biggest fans and give them back the respect they deserve? I don’t understand why you want to fight it.

Your first statement is interesting. It’s true, BrokenJohnny may have more “education,” but what sort of education is it?

From what I have seen, no one has claimed that men aren’t great leaders; however, keep in mind that it is generally men who decide when to go to war. Sometimes, male leaders don’t think things all the way through. Then again, some female leaders don’t think things all the way through either. Think of Bloody Mary. Sure, it made sense then, but now..not so much.

The overall point is, Keb, that yes, we’ll respect them, but we want that same respect in return. Why should we respect them unconditionally if they do not have the courtesy to do the same?
Personally, I believe respect is earned, not given. I do my best to earn my respect, and respect no man unless he has deserved it. No man can claim “because I’m a man” and ‘earn’ respect. It doesn’t work that way. If it did, any mother could go “I am a mother” and ‘earn’ respect. That would follow the theory that we actually follow that thing called the Bible.
I’m not a big fan of religion. So no thank you. My mother earned her respect, same as I earn mine. Same as men have to earn their respect.
It’s give and take, really. That’s why we don’t just sit quietly and ‘let’ things happen. That’s why we fight.

Dr. Phil said:

Yup, and it’s funny. Poor next generation… Kids are being taught by their women teachers that women like nice respectful guys who treat them with dignity and respect, but we all know that when they get older, they’ll discover the shocking truth. Women LIKE being treated like garbage, a piece of meat, just a little girl inferior to men and needing protecting. Don’t ask me why… I like being treated with common sense of respect (I give it to you and expect it in return most days) The women online talking about wanting to be treated as equals are fat losers who don’t get asked out on dates constantly by mr. muscles. The hot ones who have the whole world given to them because they’re hot, complain a hell of a lot less about their special circumstances. And the only thing women are better than men at? BEING WHORES.

thank you and good day to ya

HaHa, Hey Dr Phil

“Brandon” thinks that if all guys were “nice” there would be a chance to finally score. Kelly B. wants a bad boy, but for some misterious reason she feels she would not stand a chance of interesting a man like that, which pisses her off. A man like that doesn’t want her pussy because it’s all she can offer, and that’s not enough, that’s just being a whore. She studies psychology to find answers where she is missing, but won’t ever find them there and more she tries not to be, more she is turning into a whore she doesn’t want to be. Women want to be respected, they just pursue a wrong idea how to get that respect.

Kelly B said:

Muzalon said:

Kelly B said:

How about you get an education and then come back and see if your explanations actually are explanations at all.

What education have YOU got? A degree in psychology and flower-arranging? Psychology has been trashed by sociobiology, as founded by Edward O Wilson of Harvard: it is no longer a credible subject. For example, crime is best explained by biology (greater male aggression – violent criminals are nearly all male) and sociology (nearly all criminals are also members of the underclass, for whom crime is ‘normal’). Psychology is boolsheet: it has no effect on reducing crime among underclass males because the causes of crime are biological and subcultural.

Psychology major and an honours in sociology so far.
A lot of what you just said can be disproved or explained a lot better. I refuse to debate issues anymore without scholarly evidence of your claims.

Check any crime figures, anywhere, ever: young, poor males commit nearly all violent crime. Check out Professor Hans Eysenck’s Decline and Fall of the Freudian Empire: he gives ample evidence there that psychological counselling has had zero effect in reducing delinquent behaviour, wherever it has been tried. In fact, psychotherapy does not cure people in any other sphere, either.

Soft-science academics have had little effect on anything – despite all their research, the world is still in an atrocious state. Academics also have mediocre IQs, and tend to have working class backgrounds.

Muzalon said:

Kelly B said:

How about you get an education and then come back and see if your explanations actually are explanations at all.

What education have YOU got? A degree in psychology and flower-arranging? Psychology has been trashed by sociobiology, as founded by Edward O Wilson of Harvard: it is no longer a credible subject. For example, crime is best explained by biology (greater male aggression – violent criminals are nearly all male) and sociology (nearly all criminals are also members of the underclass, for whom crime is ‘normal’). Psychology is boolsheet: it has no effect on reducing crime among underclass males because the causes of crime are biological and subcultural.

Psychology major and an honours in sociology so far.
A lot of what you just said can be disproved or explained a lot better. I refuse to debate issues anymore without scholarly evidence of your claims.

L said:

Dawn said:
So what you’re saying is we sort of function in the same way that most animals do…for example a herd of horses? The mares obediantly follow the alpha stallion and he provides protection while also enabling reproduction?

Pretty much. Also, with current city populations and basic statistics, attractive women are no longer a scare resource. So, if a woman becomes disobedient, it’s the work of maybe an hour to drop her and find another attractive woman. Women can be attractive independently. If you put a perfect 10 in a crowd of 9s or a crowd of whales, she’s still a perfect 10. Alpha males generally need a social group over which to reign, which means that alpha males are generally scarcer than attractive women. This also leads to a lot of the social sniping in female circles; Every woman wants an advantage so that the small group of top tier males will select them over the other women.

Ahh, humanity.

Hmm…interesting. It’s kind of disheartening to look at it that way. I’ve never been a big believer of the institution of marriage, but still…definitely gives me a different viewpoint on things, though I think that nowadays a lot of men don’t feel that way anymore, and women are more independent, but it’s possible that’s not the way things are supposed to be…..interesting indeed =P

L said:

Kelly B said:

Well if I supposedly cannot add anything useful, then what’s your excuse for not being able to add anything useful?

I’m adding something, it’s just beyond your grasp. It’s called “comedy” and it’s one of the other things men are better at than women. You see, when a woman wants to insult a guy, she has a few standard insults. She shouts “You’re gay!” Then she shouts “You don’t have a girlfriend!” At least males can come up with interesting and entertaining insults, such as “Your father was a hamster and your mother smelled of elderberries!” No woman could come up with that. If you gave a thousand a monkeys with a thousand typewriters infinite time, they’d have Shakespeare’s plays done on Monday, but only if they were male. If they’re female, all they’ll have is a treatise on which nail polish to use, and even then it’d be wrong because no one gives a shit.

Women lack imagination, the first cousin of humour. They are also fat bastards!

BrokenJohnny has more education in his little toe than you have in that whole head of yours.

Why can’t men be the dominant sex? Why can’t they be great leaders? Why can’t we women just stand proud behind them and be their biggest fans and give them back the respect they deserve? I don’t understand why you want to fight it.

Kelly B said:

Well if I supposedly cannot add anything useful, then what’s your excuse for not being able to add anything useful?

I’m adding something, it’s just beyond your grasp. It’s called “comedy” and it’s one of the other things men are better at than women. You see, when a woman wants to insult a guy, she has a few standard insults. She shouts “You’re gay!” Then she shouts “You don’t have a girlfriend!” At least males can come up with interesting and entertaining insults, such as “Your father was a hamster and your mother smelled of elderberries!” No woman could come up with that. If you gave a thousand a monkeys with a thousand typewriters infinite time, they’d have Shakespeare’s plays done on Monday, but only if they were male. If they’re female, all they’ll have is a treatise on which nail polish to use, and even then it’d be wrong because no one gives a shit.

Kelly B said:

How about you get an education and then come back and see if your explanations actually are explanations at all.

What education have YOU got? A degree in psychology and flower-arranging? Psychology has been trashed by sociobiology, as founded by Edward O Wilson of Harvard: it is no longer a credible subject. For example, crime is best explained by biology (greater male aggression – violent criminals are nearly all male) and sociology (nearly all criminals are also members of the underclass, for whom crime is ‘normal’). Psychology is boolsheet: it has no effect on reducing crime among underclass males because the causes of crime are biological and subcultural.

Dawn said:

Why is it you think women like to be treated like garbage?

It’s a class thing. Lower class women from dysfunctional homes want to re-enact their abusive childhoods with the abusive, dead-beat dads they knew as kids. Middle class women are looking for 1958 knights in armour that just don’t exist in post-modern reality. Either way, they’re fucked and living in Disneyland.

Well if I supposedly cannot add anything useful, then what’s your excuse for not being able to add anything useful?

Kelly B said:
How about you get an education and then come back and see if your explanations actually are explanations at all.

How about you don’t blockquote two pages of text?
How about you add something reasonably useful to this site?

Oh… You’re a woman. Right.

BrokenJohnny said:

You’re fighting a losing battle. I offered constructive, intelligent comments and questions a few weeks ago. The only response from the viewers of this website I got were just about as intelligent as my piss. I respect a woman, or any person, intelligent enough, brave enough, to come to this site and voice their opinion.

Do you respect the bravery of a child who comes to a bear with a stick and is killed? No. You pity it for it’s stupidity.

You respect a warrior who comes to a bear with a sword and kills it.

As mentioned before if my fellow men thought more with their brains than their balls, this society would finally have a chance at moving forward.

No argument there.

There is no proof women are less intelligent,

What is the ratio of male inventors to female inventors? That’s your proof.

or no proof women are worse drivers,

Ratio of men to women in racing sports? Proof again.

or no proof men are better than women in any way.

Ratio of men to women in running businesses, owning businesses, ruling countries, winning elections, winning wars, inventing technology, curing diseases…

I’m not saying I don’t love women. I’m not saying women are useless. I’m not saying women aren’t essential.

But men are better than women.

Please, please prove me wrong.

I did.

If you use a sports as a reason for male dominance, please. . . please. . . please do not answer. Someone responded to my last comment by saying, “you aren’t bringing anything new to us.� So I ask you, what right of any kind do we as men hold over women?

Ask yourself, why is it that every religion in the entire world places man as the leader of the house hold? Ask yourself why the leader of any higher social mammal is male? Ask yourself why people in China want to have a male child, as opposed to a female child (Not that’s it’s right! Just making a point) Ask yourself why the majority of world leaders have been men.

Have women really been “oppressed” by men across all cultures, all races, and all societies, for all of recorded history? Or could it be that the male is simply the dominant sex?

Then, ask yourself that is a bad thing.

Before traditional gender roles were destroyed, divorce rates were virtually non existent, crime was down, rape was down, teen pregnancy was down, and illiteracy was down. For God’s sake man, we have 5 year old boys confused over whether or not they are gay! Five fucking years old! A five year old should even know what sex is!

If you really, really want me to, I will compile together a graph of the statistics.

Men as the dominant sex is the way of nature. Any time you go against nature, it creates a snowball effect of societal degradation.

Case closed.

How about you get an education and then come back and see if your explanations actually are explanations at all.

Dawn said:
So what you’re saying is we sort of function in the same way that most animals do…for example a herd of horses? The mares obediantly follow the alpha stallion and he provides protection while also enabling reproduction?

Pretty much. Also, with current city populations and basic statistics, attractive women are no longer a scare resource. So, if a woman becomes disobedient, it’s the work of maybe an hour to drop her and find another attractive woman. Women can be attractive independently. If you put a perfect 10 in a crowd of 9s or a crowd of whales, she’s still a perfect 10. Alpha males generally need a social group over which to reign, which means that alpha males are generally scarcer than attractive women. This also leads to a lot of the social sniping in female circles; Every woman wants an advantage so that the small group of top tier males will select them over the other women.

Ahh, humanity.

Having an epiphany Dawn?

L said:

Dawn said:

Why is it you think women like to be treated like garbage?

Being treated like garbage is a side effect. Women want to be with alpha males. Alpha males can get away with whatever the hell they want, and a lot of them use their dominance to abuse others. You can find alphas who don’t, but they’re usually busy with things far harder than picking up chicks.

So what you’re saying is we sort of function in the same way that most animals do…for example a herd of horses? The mares obediantly follow the alpha stallion and he provides protection while also enabling reproduction?

Dawn said:

Why is it you think women like to be treated like garbage?

Being treated like garbage is a side effect. Women want to be with alpha males. Alpha males can get away with whatever the hell they want, and a lot of them use their dominance to abuse others. You can find alphas who don’t, but they’re usually busy with things far harder than picking up chicks.

Why is it you think women like to be treated like garbage?

Yup, and it’s funny. Poor next generation… Kids are being taught by their women teachers that women like nice respectful guys who treat them with dignity and respect, but we all know that when they get older, they’ll discover the shocking truth. Women LIKE being treated like garbage, a piece of meat, just a little girl inferior to men and needing protecting. Don’t ask me why… I like being treated with common sense of respect (I give it to you and expect it in return most days) The women online talking about wanting to be treated as equals are fat losers who don’t get asked out on dates constantly by mr. muscles. The hot ones who have the whole world given to them because they’re hot, complain a hell of a lot less about their special circumstances. And the only thing women are better than men at? BEING WHORES.

thank you and good day to ya

You’re fighting a losing battle. I offered constructive, intelligent comments and questions a few weeks ago. The only response from the viewers of this website I got were just about as intelligent as my piss. I respect a woman, or any person, intelligent enough, brave enough, to come to this site and voice their opinion.

Do you respect the bravery of a child who comes to a bear with a stick and is killed? No. You pity it for it’s stupidity.

You respect a warrior who comes to a bear with a sword and kills it.

As mentioned before if my fellow men thought more with their brains than their balls, this society would finally have a chance at moving forward.

No argument there.

There is no proof women are less intelligent,

What is the ratio of male inventors to female inventors? That’s your proof.

or no proof women are worse drivers,

Ratio of men to women in racing sports? Proof again.

or no proof men are better than women in any way.

Ratio of men to women in running businesses, owning businesses, ruling countries, winning elections, winning wars, inventing technology, curing diseases…

I’m not saying I don’t love women. I’m not saying women are useless. I’m not saying women aren’t essential.

But men are better than women.

Please, please prove me wrong.

I did.

If you use a sports as a reason for male dominance, please. . . please. . . please do not answer. Someone responded to my last comment by saying, “you aren’t bringing anything new to us.� So I ask you, what right of any kind do we as men hold over women?

Ask yourself, why is it that every religion in the entire world places man as the leader of the house hold? Ask yourself why the leader of any higher social mammal is male? Ask yourself why people in China want to have a male child, as opposed to a female child (Not that’s it’s right! Just making a point) Ask yourself why the majority of world leaders have been men.

Have women really been “oppressed” by men across all cultures, all races, and all societies, for all of recorded history? Or could it be that the male is simply the dominant sex?

Then, ask yourself that is a bad thing.

Before traditional gender roles were destroyed, divorce rates were virtually non existent, crime was down, rape was down, teen pregnancy was down, and illiteracy was down. For God’s sake man, we have 5 year old boys confused over whether or not they are gay! Five fucking years old! A five year old should even know what sex is!

If you really, really want me to, I will compile together a graph of the statistics.

Men as the dominant sex is the way of nature. Any time you go against nature, it creates a snowball effect of societal degradation.

Case closed.

Kelly B said:

brandon said:

Kelly B,
You’re fighting a losing battle. I offered constructive, intelligent comments and questions a few weeks ago. The only response from the viewers of this website I got were just about as intelligent as my piss. I respect a woman, or any person, intelligent enough, brave enough, to come to this site and voice their opinion. As mentioned before if my fellow men thought more with their brains than their balls, this society would finally have a chance at moving forward. There is no proof women are less intelligent, or no proof women are worse drivers, or no proof men are better than women in any way. Please, please prove me wrong. If you use a sports as a reason for male dominance, please. . . please. . . please do not answer. Someone responded to my last comment by saying, “you aren’t bringing anything new to us.” So I ask you, what right of any kind do we as men hold over women?

Amen for men like you. :)

Gentlemen, behold! The beta-male! And one that thinks being a beta-male is going to get him laid!

TheManTheory said:

Kelly B said:

Kelly Bowen?
Anyways. I think I’m seriously done. The only two people who portrayed any intelligence on this site were No Manhole and Brandon. Therefore I’m going to go elsewhere and have conversation with people who actually know something about the world. Later!

You said that before.

Get the fuck off the site, nobody wants you here.

All you do is spam up the topic with no real arugement.

Fuck off.

Thank you.

Kelly B said:

Kelly Bowen?
Anyways. I think I’m seriously done. The only two people who portrayed any intelligence on this site were No Manhole and Brandon. Therefore I’m going to go elsewhere and have conversation with people who actually know something about the world. Later!

You said that before.

Get the fuck off the site, nobody wants you here.

All you do is spam up the topic with no real arugement.

Fuck off.

on intelligence.
The thing is, i know it’s a weird concept but if we look at how things are, and as men being what we are with what we know, we kind of have some social responsabilities about this whole mess. Bear with me there, i know how it is, how women are, but trapped in this, there’s only one (poor) way out and it’s to teach them how things really are cause they live in a dream world. Feminism has indeed took away our possibility to teach them anything. But you gotta remind something, at 20 we are as dumb as they are. Don’t come up with some “yea but no” rhetoric, you know what i mean. It is true that women are ahead of us at a certain age, but if you agree with that, you can also agree that later on, as we get really later starts, we overcome that gap and end up way ahead of them, and even they stop where we start and we don’t stop. But i truly believe that there is no man out there who isn’t who he is without any contact of any women, i’d still be playing ball with my buddies you know. If you see things as a sinusoidal was that goes minus to plus, when we are on our plus, things are already fucked up. I think men (dads) teach us how to be good while women (mothers) teach us how to be bad, and that’s where balance is. What i mean is there is no women playing the field without men willing to play it too at a certain age. It’s all about timing. It’s all about you gotta vote republican until you gotta vote liberal, and from that i mean, you gotta get the worst of things before you can switch and realize it was crap (don’t see any political view on this, just an example). How many of us have been trapped into some scene until we got passed it and realized it wasn’t it, or was it for a time. The trouble is, our length is way longer than theirs, and they know it, and they play it. But when our time has come, when it’s our turn to be in charge of things, the matter is, they don’t accept it. They accept to be ahead for some time but don’t accept we grow up too and for the best, and when it’s our turn they don’t let go and stay endlessly into that mere childhood. Women have problems letting go of things if they don’t get it and when does that come from? From the fact that they accept that at a certain age, they have it more than we do but it doesn’t last forever, and it’s all about life understanding and wave length. It’s typical from a woman to think, that whatever she does, it has no impact on the world and it stays trapped inside the 4 walls where it happened. And i think , and it was possible at a certain time in history, that it’s our duty to take them off of that path they’re walking it, but nowadays, we lack respect, we lack recognition. They lack the will to take back our good in exchange for their bad. They lack … life itself.

Our society has accepted this myth that women are equal to men to such a degree that any logical challenge to this lie is openly ridiculed. I mean, ask yourself can you freely talk about this subject with your co-workers? Chances are that you would not, because honestly who needs the bullshit that might ensue when some land whale hears of it? Most of us live under corporate feminist state.
Women are their own enemies. They really don’t know what the fuck they want, ever, period. Even if they really think they know, they don’t. That’s what men are for, a woman can do her best if she just shuts the fuck up and follows, knowing deep down that her man knows best. Even if he doesn’t. A great woman is the one who uses her mouth for two things: telling her man how great he is, and you know what else…
Every man has in himself a guide to his own greatness. Problem is that this society of today somehow programmed into this man that a woman can know and be certain just like a man can. This has not happened, maybe with evolution, but I’m not holding my breath. When I was in high school I actually bought all this feminist crap, and I didn’t get laid. Women have no respect for a guy that treats them as an equal or worse puts them on a pedestal. If feminism is correct a guy like I was in high school would get laid constantly but alas this doesn’t occur. Between grade 11 and 12 I went for a 2 month long basic training in the armor core. It totally opened my eyes. Now don’t be stupid and sign up for the military because I did, be smart, the war is on. When I came back I became like a new person, confidant, could care less what others thought, dominant, patronizing women, and guess what, I got LAID, and a lot. The same girls that didn’t know I even existed before lined up to hook up with me. I never looked back…
To sum it up, most women would like to be thought and payed as an equal, and at the same time have a man in their life that sets them straight. Deep down they know they crave it and need it, that’s also why they have nothing but outright contempt for a man that lets them boss him around. All you ‘nice’ guys that keep on calling Dick to set him straight just don’t get it, and I pity you because I know you all are missing out on what it means to be a man. Hell, I’ve been there, done that, got the postcard, and will never go back.

–/ end of rant

Well, after hearing the women and those guys at the end talking shit, I just have to say that it is just fucking GREAT (sarcasm, by the way) to know that my side has such ARTICULATE and INTELLIGENT people representing it. Fuck. Looks like you win for now, Mr Masterson, as I don’t know what I can say that will redeem the gender equality side after hearing those morons talk. GG.

Women consider male intelligence equitable to beta submission.

The truely intelligent and powerful men they call neanderthals and morons – anything that comes out of a the mouth of an estrogen sack is nothing but lies.

Die young bleed slow.

Kelly B said:

Kelly Bowen?
Anyways. I think I’m seriously done. The only two people who portrayed any intelligence on this site were No Manhole and Brandon. Therefore I’m going to go elsewhere and have conversation with people who actually know something about the world. Later!

Ok bitch your making his fucking point. You keep triple posting and you dont shut the fuck up, how about make your fucking point, and then stop fucking posting. For fuck sake, can you get any more retarded? Go read or something.

Kelly Bowen?
Anyways. I think I’m seriously done. The only two people who portrayed any intelligence on this site were No Manhole and Brandon. Therefore I’m going to go elsewhere and have conversation with people who actually know something about the world. Later!

Kelly Bowen refuses to acknowledge that her whole life is financed and supported by men.

She’s just another female “educated” idiot. Knowledge by rote with no natural ability to apply it…

I’m not going to argue about this subject anymore though.
* A retreat is the same as a loss.

I think (and I have said this before) that males and females are too diverse to be grouped into one stereotypical set of behaviours.
*
Whether you said it or not, no one cares.

I think men and women should respect each other, where respect is deserved.
*
Nope, where respect is EARNED do you get any.

Women who EARN respect get it. The rest feel that having breasts and a vagina = respect.

I just find it funny because I don’t fit the stereotypical woman that is presented on this site and I do not think it is fair that men may treat all women based on this one stereotype.
*
WTF is this about YOU? No one CARES about you here. Your ‘feelings’ your ‘thoughts’, your ‘opinion’ mean NOTHING to 99.99% of the MEN here. BTW, this is where MEN get to talk…why are you here wasting OUR time trying to show how YOU are special. You’re a female—like billions more on the Earth. Look, why don’t you go to a feminist website…they’ll like you there.
But like all children, you want to know what the ADULTS are doing…and it annoys you that we see you as nothing but a whiny brat trying to disrupt our mandependence from women like you.

I don’t dress like a bimbo,
*
We actually consider it more slut wear or a hooker outfit.

I am in a steady long-term relationship with a man I love who I met at a very young age and have shared a lot of my life with..
*
Yawn. You’re not married, so you’re still single. No one cares except other females.

it has nothing to do with money or sex or anything like that.
*
As always, look for a prostitute to deny what she really is.

He is my bestfriend.
*
Women usually call their whipped slaves bestfriend.

I am also on the Dean’s list at a very well recognized university in Canada.
*
I have a female friend in the same boat…she’s much smarter than you.

I have strong morals and treat people fairly and try to see the good in everyone.
*
Rather than feed this attention whore, anyone go see ‘Forbidden Kingdom’? Is it manly enough for MEN or is it just barely good enough for even Die Hard status?

I am not some spoiled brat who has had everything given to be on a silver plater.. I grew up in a shady part of town with a SINGLE MOTHER because the father ran off so he could smoke his crack and party and have nothing to do with kids… imagine that. I have had the one closest person in my life die. I have worked my ass off to make sure I can have a decent career… I live on student loans. I have had no financial support from anyone, I don’t want or need it either. I have always been very independent.
*

Another thing…instead of listing to this drivel about this ‘poor widdle girl who done good’, let’s talk about the rising cost of gas and food.

Anyways, I’m not here to brag or tell my whole life story and yes I am well aware you all don’t give a fuck anyways. However, I just want you to know that not all women (probably not even MOST women) fit this stereotype. If you want to express your opinions among yourselves then fine. I just think you should try to see people for who they are, not for the sex that they are. I am met some pretty not so nice guys too you know. And have been hurt by guys too, one being the rejection of my father. And it’s pretty evident (some of you have even told me) that you have been hurt by women too. You need to move past that though because the day you meet someone who you know is completely right for you and will love more than your own life, you will look back and realize exactly what I am talking about.

*
Sorry, Gentlemen, I was watching Youtube ‘The Internet is for Porn’ and listening to Lord Masterson’s fan club and those who can’t quite figure out Dick doesn’t CARE if they don’t like him and why are they SOOOO concerned about his sex life- he’s getting laid, cool.

Did she say anything that we haven’t heard before or is it some self-righteous Dr. Fool BS that we may want to focus on?

Cliffs Notes, anyone?

Deathslayer

Kelly B said:

It’s more than an opinion though. Because you men actually WANT women to be nothing but sex-tools… and to have no rights… and you are PROMOTING this to as many men as possible hoping they will conform to these thoughts.

No one has to mold or desire women into being soulless sluts.

You do it on your own.

Men are actually capable of love unlike you and get burnt at a young age when they persue their first or second “relationship”. Then they learn through betrayal the true weaker sex in every aspect.

Some with large resoure pools respond with the “Dick” style of sex addict chauvanism because it’s very capitalist and Western in a Roman Empire kind of way.

I am not so forgiving. I mean to bring war without end to you and all your male enablers. You should pray Dick’s world triumphs.

Kelly B said:

Arbalest said:

Also, no one is subjecting you or any other woman to read, you come on your own free will. The magical patriarchy of doom did not force your browser to come back here and read something OVER THE INTERNET.

I never said they were but thanks for letting me know, I am so glad you cleared that up for me. Dick went on national television to try and promote his radical views.
Are you telling me this is just a website where you vent but then run back to your woman and act all nice and respectful to her? Or when you meet a woman are you like “you are a stupid whore”? If this is a site were you men just vent but in REAL LIFE act like normal respecful human beings then fine, however promoting this ideology is dangerous and oppressive, especially when Dick is doing it through television+internet+merchandise+books, and so forth.

You are such a dumb fucking cow.

This isn’t venting.

It’s a site for the recruitment and engineering of a New Patriarchy and the death of everything you love.

The point he was making was NO ONE’s making you sit here and whine. Your pathetic views affect no one and change nothing. Souls mangled by your ‘rights’ can’t be rebuilt by your never ending emtpy nagging.

Nothing you say matters. The oppression of the strong by the parasite is coming to an end. Cry to your finger painting instuctor.

Samantaha Lo said:

How about them shitty book sale numbers? Don’t lose any more hair over it dick.

I doubt her children are spared that sarcastic attitude.

-Dick

How about them shitty book sale numbers? Don’t lose any more hair over it dick.

Those people who are calling in (the majority of the men anyways) know about calling in… HOW? Because of this site…
You have no formal training in conducting research do you? You should hit up some books.

Uh, so I guess all those men calling in to urge dick to keep up the fight all think women deserve dignity and respect… logic of a woman, folks.

Not while I am alive. As much as this “cult” bugs me, the majority of men view women as actual human beings who deserve dignity and respect (basic human right). So too bad, you lose.

Fucking hell, you got a real feminized male at the end of this one, Dick. I’m afraid he’s not alone… Most young men today were taught by women teachers, raised without fathers or barely knew them, taught to let women walk all over them. And as you can clearly see, women will not own up to the fact that they’ve taken feminism too far. It’s going to be tough, bringing manhood back but we can do it, i tell ya.

brandon said:

Kelly B,
You’re fighting a losing battle. I offered constructive, intelligent comments and questions a few weeks ago. The only response from the viewers of this website I got were just about as intelligent as my piss. I respect a woman, or any person, intelligent enough, brave enough, to come to this site and voice their opinion. As mentioned before if my fellow men thought more with their brains than their balls, this society would finally have a chance at moving forward. There is no proof women are less intelligent, or no proof women are worse drivers, or no proof men are better than women in any way. Please, please prove me wrong. If you use a sports as a reason for male dominance, please. . . please. . . please do not answer. Someone responded to my last comment by saying, “you aren’t bringing anything new to us.” So I ask you, what right of any kind do we as men hold over women?

Amen for men like you. :)

Arbalest said:

What he said, men do not see women as sex tools, men see women as they see themselves. Many women know they don’t have much to offer a partner so they dress up as pretty as possible. Quite frankly the same women who think all men want them for is for sex are the same ones who spend so much time making themselves look good. They can’t face their own issues so they project them on the nearest man possible….you know the same way the feminists come here and accuse Dick of making a cult. Ironic it is.

It is a cult in a sense… there is a set of beliefs and members who follow those beliefs. Yes I am a feminist, a lot of people are and just don’t realize what it actually means to be a feminist. I believe in equality in all aspects of life and the deconstruction of “gender.”

And what you said above about women and sex and men probably holds some validity. Not sure if that is what you are implying I am though. What I meant is the current ideology presented on this site DOES basically say we are only good for fucking (even though theres a post about how we suck as sex, so it’s pretty contradictory.)

I’m not going to argue about this subject anymore though. I think (and I have said this before) that males and females are too diverse to be grouped into one stereotypical set of behaviours.

I think men and women should respect each other, where respect is deserved.

I just find it funny because I don’t fit the stereotypical woman that is presented on this site and I do not think it is fair that men may treat all women based on this one stereotype. I don’t dress like a bimbo, I am in a steady long-term relationship with a man I love who I met at a very young age and have shared a lot of my life with.. it has nothing to do with money or sex or anything like that. He is my bestfriend. I am also on the Dean’s list at a very well recognized university in Canada. I have strong morals and treat people fairly and try to see the good in everyone. I am not some spoiled brat who has had everything given to be on a silver plater.. I grew up in a shady part of town with a SINGLE MOTHER because the father ran off so he could smoke his crack and party and have nothing to do with kids… imagine that. I have had the one closest person in my life die. I have worked my ass off to make sure I can have a decent career… I live on student loans. I have had no financial support from anyone, I don’t want or need it either. I have always been very independent.

Anyways, I’m not here to brag or tell my whole life story and yes I am well aware you all don’t give a fuck anyways. However, I just want you to know that not all women (probably not even MOST women) fit this stereotype. If you want to express your opinions among yourselves then fine. I just think you should try to see people for who they are, not for the sex that they are. I am met some pretty not so nice guys too you know. And have been hurt by guys too, one being the rejection of my father. And it’s pretty evident (some of you have even told me) that you have been hurt by women too. You need to move past that though because the day you meet someone who you know is completely right for you and will love more than your own life, you will look back and realize exactly what I am talking about.

Kelly B,
You’re fighting a losing battle. I offered constructive, intelligent comments and questions a few weeks ago. The only response from the viewers of this website I got were just about as intelligent as my piss. I respect a woman, or any person, intelligent enough, brave enough, to come to this site and voice their opinion. As mentioned before if my fellow men thought more with their brains than their balls, this society would finally have a chance at moving forward. There is no proof women are less intelligent, or no proof women are worse drivers, or no proof men are better than women in any way. Please, please prove me wrong. If you use a sports as a reason for male dominance, please. . . please. . . please do not answer. Someone responded to my last comment by saying, “you aren’t bringing anything new to us.” So I ask you, what right of any kind do we as men hold over women?

regretfulmorning.com said:

Kelly B said:

Dick Masterson said:

Kelly B has three posts in a row. It’s official. She’s obsessed with me.

Three posts in a row equals obsession.

-Dick

You are too funny. I’ll admit, I find it hard to resist posting. Obsessed with you though? No. Haha. Keep dreaming hunny.

calling someone “hunny” on the internet is the same as saying “my legs are spread for you” in person.

Pretty sure it’s not. You should really stop refering everything back so sex, there’s a lot more to life than just fucking, eh.

B Dorian said:

Kelly B said:

It’s more than an opinion though. Because you men actually WANT women to be nothing but sex-tools… and to have no rights… and you are PROMOTING this to as many men as possible hoping they will conform to these thoughts.

Nothing but sex tools? No. Just to stop nagging, whining, and spouting out anything else that completely not constructive.

No rights? No. Basic human rights, great. But the right to divorce a man on a whim, take the money, kids, and house? No.

A great woman is one who is fun to be with and understands that they aren’t the only woman in the universe. Make and effort to keep your man happy rather than demanding all kinda of respect and attention. Both are earned, you’re not entitled just because you are a woman.

and I agree with you. BUT the same goes for men too.

What he said, men do not see women as sex tools, men see women as they see themselves. Many women know they don’t have much to offer a partner so they dress up as pretty as possible. Quite frankly the same women who think all men want them for is for sex are the same ones who spend so much time making themselves look good. They can’t face their own issues so they project them on the nearest man possible….you know the same way the feminists come here and accuse Dick of making a cult. Ironic it is.

Kelly B said:

Dick Masterson said:

Kelly B has three posts in a row. It’s official. She’s obsessed with me.

Three posts in a row equals obsession.

-Dick

You are too funny. I’ll admit, I find it hard to resist posting. Obsessed with you though? No. Haha. Keep dreaming hunny.

calling someone “hunny” on the internet is the same as saying “my legs are spread for you” in person.

Kelly B said:

It’s more than an opinion though. Because you men actually WANT women to be nothing but sex-tools… and to have no rights… and you are PROMOTING this to as many men as possible hoping they will conform to these thoughts.

Nothing but sex tools? No. Just to stop nagging, whining, and spouting out anything else that completely not constructive.

No rights? No. Basic human rights, great. But the right to divorce a man on a whim, take the money, kids, and house? No.

A great woman is one who is fun to be with and understands that they aren’t the only woman in the universe. Make and effort to keep your man happy rather than demanding all kinda of respect and attention. Both are earned, you’re not entitled just because you are a woman.

It’s more than an opinion though. Because you men actually WANT women to be nothing but sex-tools… and to have no rights… and you are PROMOTING this to as many men as possible hoping they will conform to these thoughts.

Kelly B said:

Arbalest said:

Also, no one is subjecting you or any other woman to read, you come on your own free will. The magical patriarchy of doom did not force your browser to come back here and read something OVER THE INTERNET.

I never said they were but thanks for letting me know, I am so glad you cleared that up for me. Dick went on national television to try and promote his radical views.

A: Sorry, I feel like someone needs to defend the women subjected to your ignorance.

Besides the fact that you going back on what you said…again..Dick was invited to Dr. Phil the same as the other 4 or 5 were to give out his opinion.

Are you telling me this is just a website where you vent but then run back to your woman and act all nice and respectful to her?Or when you meet a woman are you like “you are a stupid whore”? If this is a site were you men just vent but in REAL LIFE act like normal respecful human beings then fine, however promoting this ideology is dangerous and oppressive, especially when Dick is doing it through television+internet+merchandise+books, and so fort

Your? I do not own a woman. I did not go to walmart and pick up a female on sale with a can of coke. Besides, it’s only a opinion. We agree or disagree and keep going. There’s no reason to try to shut down someone’s opinion like it’s some demon because you don’t like it. Trying to do so is chilish..which would be fitting,eh?

Dick Masterson said:

Kelly B said:

How about you prove this to me. Anyone can sit here and make shit up. I actually know people, first hand, who have been royally fucked over by the FATHER and the mother did not initiate anything and worked her ass off to make sure that child had some kind of a life because the father was no wheres to be found. In one case he was off doing drugs and living like an immature idiot.

The walking womb should have used better judgment before spreading her legs. Women write checks with their vagina that their skill set can’t cash.

-Dick

I honestly hope you are not like this is real life… if so then you will have trouble finding a woman you will be happy with for the rest of your life… I am sincere in saying this and I am not trying to put you down. I just think you should really reconsider a lot of your views. If you want to act macho on this site then fine, but I hope someday you meet someone and treat her with dignity and respect.

Some women are EXACTLY how you describe them, hell I cringe everyday seeing and hearing some of the things women do and say… sometimes I honestly feel embarrassed to be a woman because I feel like a lot of women ASK to be degraded… BUT there are GREAT women out there and I think it is too bad you have not been fortunate enough to meet them yet.
As easy as it is to hate you, I for some reason don’t. I believe there is good in everyone and I know there is more to you then this whole “menarebetterthanwomen” empire. :)

And you cannot just blame the fact a woman is pregnant and the father is no wheres to be found on the fact that she “opened her legs” to begin with. Because it takes TWO to create the baby and the father should own up to what he did. Yes, she should have chosen a better man but that still doesn’t have anything to do with the fact its the MAN not owning up to his mistakes.

Arbalest said:

Also, no one is subjecting you or any other woman to read, you come on your own free will. The magical patriarchy of doom did not force your browser to come back here and read something OVER THE INTERNET.

I never said they were but thanks for letting me know, I am so glad you cleared that up for me. Dick went on national television to try and promote his radical views.
Are you telling me this is just a website where you vent but then run back to your woman and act all nice and respectful to her? Or when you meet a woman are you like “you are a stupid whore”? If this is a site were you men just vent but in REAL LIFE act like normal respecful human beings then fine, however promoting this ideology is dangerous and oppressive, especially when Dick is doing it through television+internet+merchandise+books, and so forth.

Kelly B said:

Arbalest said:

Kelly B said:

Arbalest said:

Kelly B said:

GeorgeWatson said:

I just want to beat the shit out of the last caller. I think he was raised by a single mom.

A lot of people ARE raised by single moms because the “Dad” fucks off because men don’t know how to take on responsibility. So kudos to all the single moms out there, SOMEONE has to raise the children.

Oh please. The dad “fucks off” because because the “mother” runs him off with falsified rape and child abuse charges. That is not raising children that’s just screwing kids over for money.

No not necessarily. I know of several cases were the man just wanted to get fucked and never cared once there was an announcement of a child on the way. Had NOTHING to do with the woman.

and I can tell you those cases are in the minority compared to other cases. Not only do women intiate most of the seperations they they rarely pay child support or use the money on the children.

How about you prove this to me. Anyone can sit here and make shit up. I actually know people, first hand, who have been royally fucked over by the FATHER and the mother did not initiate anything and worked her ass off to make sure that child had some kind of a life because the father was no wheres to be found. In one case he was off doing drugs and living like an immature idiot.

Bitch should take responsibility and choose a better man.

If she wants to be a whore and fuck assholes and losers, let her, she dug her own grave.

Kelly B said:

How about you prove this to me. Anyone can sit here and make shit up. I actually know people, first hand, who have been royally fucked over by the FATHER and the mother did not initiate anything and worked her ass off to make sure that child had some kind of a life because the father was no wheres to be found. In one case he was off doing drugs and living like an immature idiot.

The walking womb should have used better judgment before spreading her legs. Women write checks with their vagina that their skill set can’t cash.

-Dick

Also, no one is subjecting you or any other woman to read, you come on your own free will. The magical patriarchy of doom did not force your browser to come back here and read something OVER THE INTERNET.

Arbalest said:

Kelly B said:

Arbalest said:

Kelly B said:

GeorgeWatson said:

I just want to beat the shit out of the last caller. I think he was raised by a single mom.

A lot of people ARE raised by single moms because the “Dad” fucks off because men don’t know how to take on responsibility. So kudos to all the single moms out there, SOMEONE has to raise the children.

Oh please. The dad “fucks off” because because the “mother” runs him off with falsified rape and child abuse charges. That is not raising children that’s just screwing kids over for money.

No not necessarily. I know of several cases were the man just wanted to get fucked and never cared once there was an announcement of a child on the way. Had NOTHING to do with the woman.

and I can tell you those cases are in the minority compared to other cases. Not only do women intiate most of the seperations they they rarely pay child support or use the money on the children.

How about you prove this to me. Anyone can sit here and make shit up. I actually know people, first hand, who have been royally fucked over by the FATHER and the mother did not initiate anything and worked her ass off to make sure that child had some kind of a life because the father was no wheres to be found. In one case he was off doing drugs and living like an immature idiot.

OH! (still listening to voicemails)
Dick,
you said something about “statistics don’t lie” you honestly have no type of formal post-secondary education do you? Statistics are social constructs and they are NOT objective truth. So rethink what you say because you make yourself look stupid. And that guy who said the stuff about you just wanting fame and attention, definately true.

Kelly B said:

Arbalest said:

Kelly B said:

GeorgeWatson said:

I just want to beat the shit out of the last caller. I think he was raised by a single mom.

A lot of people ARE raised by single moms because the “Dad” fucks off because men don’t know how to take on responsibility. So kudos to all the single moms out there, SOMEONE has to raise the children.

Oh please. The dad “fucks off” because because the “mother” runs him off with falsified rape and child abuse charges. That is not raising children that’s just screwing kids over for money.

No not necessarily. I know of several cases were the man just wanted to get fucked and never cared once there was an announcement of a child on the way. Had NOTHING to do with the woman.

and I can tell you those cases are in the minority compared to other cases. Not only do women intiate most of the seperations they they rarely pay child support or use the money on the children.

Arbalest said:

Don’t forget that she left forever 3 times already.

Sorry, I feel like someone needs to defend the women subjected to your ignorance.

PS:
How come no one stepped up to the plate to answer the questions I asked above….
I really am interested in hearing some “well thought-out” answers.

Arbalest said:

Kelly B said:

GeorgeWatson said:

I just want to beat the shit out of the last caller. I think he was raised by a single mom.

A lot of people ARE raised by single moms because the “Dad” fucks off because men don’t know how to take on responsibility. So kudos to all the single moms out there, SOMEONE has to raise the children.

Oh please. The dad “fucks off” because because the “mother” runs him off with falsified rape and child abuse charges. That is not raising children that’s just screwing kids over for money.

No not necessarily. I know of several cases were the man just wanted to get fucked and never cared once there was an announcement of a child on the way. Had NOTHING to do with the woman.

no manhole said:

Kelly B said:

Dutch269 said:

Excellent points, I have taken many IQ tests and I always fall between 118-125. These tests are only partly based on education and memory.

Justin your so right, so many young men think they can get more pussy if they just fight for the girls side, but thankfully there are many that are like us, strong and dominant, and want nothing to do with those feminist pigs.

Ladies, before you start harping, strong does not mean beating up women or degrading them, it simply means we don’t put up with BS, not from you, not from anyone.

In my office, I am considered the “hard ass” of the bunch, one guy called me a “Gentle giant”, and guess what, all the chicks in my office flirt with me constantly. I play the game, but I never get suckered into the BS, and I get major respect for it.

Time for all men to take a stand.

I have taken a lot of those so called “intelligence tests” you speak of too (only psychologists and psychiatrists can administer an actual legitimate intelligence test.) and I always get a 124-ish. Looks like you aren’t that much “smarter” than me after all.

But I’m smarter than you, Kelly (mine is 135) :) But at the same time, unless he’s lying, Commander Scott with his IQ of 150 is smarter than me. Just proves that just because you score well on an IQ test doesn’t mean your not a complete fucktard.

Exactly, AND there are a lot of people who I am sure do not score well but are still fairly “intelligent.” Like I said, it was invented as a way to distinguish who was mentally retarded and who wasn’t a long time ago and it’s still mainly used for that purpose.

Dick Masterson said:

Kelly B has three posts in a row. It’s official. She’s obsessed with me.

Three posts in a row equals obsession.

-Dick

You are too funny. I’ll admit, I find it hard to resist posting. Obsessed with you though? No. Haha. Keep dreaming hunny.

Kelly B said:

GeorgeWatson said:

I just want to beat the shit out of the last caller. I think he was raised by a single mom.

A lot of people ARE raised by single moms because the “Dad” fucks off because men don’t know how to take on responsibility. So kudos to all the single moms out there, SOMEONE has to raise the children.

Oh please. The dad “fucks off” because because the “mother” runs him off with falsified rape and child abuse charges. That is not raising children that’s just screwing kids over for money.

Kelly B said:

Dutch269 said:

Excellent points, I have taken many IQ tests and I always fall between 118-125. These tests are only partly based on education and memory.

Justin your so right, so many young men think they can get more pussy if they just fight for the girls side, but thankfully there are many that are like us, strong and dominant, and want nothing to do with those feminist pigs.

Ladies, before you start harping, strong does not mean beating up women or degrading them, it simply means we don’t put up with BS, not from you, not from anyone.

In my office, I am considered the “hard ass” of the bunch, one guy called me a “Gentle giant”, and guess what, all the chicks in my office flirt with me constantly. I play the game, but I never get suckered into the BS, and I get major respect for it.

Time for all men to take a stand.

I have taken a lot of those so called “intelligence tests” you speak of too (only psychologists and psychiatrists can administer an actual legitimate intelligence test.) and I always get a 124-ish. Looks like you aren’t that much “smarter” than me after all.

But I’m smarter than you, Kelly (mine is 135) :) But at the same time, unless he’s lying, Commander Scott with his IQ of 150 is smarter than me. Just proves that just because you score well on an IQ test doesn’t mean your not a complete fucktard.

Don’t forget that she left forever 3 times already.

Kelly B has three posts in a row. It’s official. She’s obsessed with me.

Three posts in a row equals obsession.

-Dick

On a site note:
These voice mails are pointless because:
1. Dick talks over most of them and you can’t even hear the whole thing. Very annoying Dick.
2. A lot of these stupid things listed I have ALSO seen or heard of MALES doing. What’s the deal with that? Like, just for one example, I know a lot of guys who have done dumb shit with cars (wreck their engine, hit someone else).
How do you explain this? How do you explain it when men do dumb-ass shit?

Dutch269 said:

Excellent points, I have taken many IQ tests and I always fall between 118-125. These tests are only partly based on education and memory.

Justin your so right, so many young men think they can get more pussy if they just fight for the girls side, but thankfully there are many that are like us, strong and dominant, and want nothing to do with those feminist pigs.

Ladies, before you start harping, strong does not mean beating up women or degrading them, it simply means we don’t put up with BS, not from you, not from anyone.

In my office, I am considered the “hard ass” of the bunch, one guy called me a “Gentle giant”, and guess what, all the chicks in my office flirt with me constantly. I play the game, but I never get suckered into the BS, and I get major respect for it.

Time for all men to take a stand.

I have taken a lot of those so called “intelligence tests” you speak of too (only psychologists and psychiatrists can administer an actual legitimate intelligence test.) and I always get a 124-ish. Looks like you aren’t that much “smarter” than me after all.

Irony said:

Kelly B said:

BUT, if you would like an explanation for why men score higher it could most likely be because men have more of an opportunity to attend university (and recieve other such types of higher education)

You can’t LEARN to do an IQ test you tit.

Never ever said you could. But your abilities to problem solve and whatever else is on there (haven’t taken any sort of “intelligence testing” since I was 10 years old) has to be learned somewhere, does it not? All I am saying is men usually do better because they have more opportunities to gain knowledge and skills throughout life. Also, its only natural that men are better at such things as math, engineering, spatial skills, etc. Has nothing to do with anyone being better or smarter, men and women naturally (usually) have very different types of skills that they excel at. However, this is not the case for all men. Lots of men can’t do a single math problem and I have female friends who are engineers.

This was also directed at Muzalon because you listed a lot of logical type problems that men typically excel at.

GeorgeWatson said:

I just want to beat the shit out of the last caller. I think he was raised by a single mom.

A lot of people ARE raised by single moms because the “Dad” fucks off because men don’t know how to take on responsibility. So kudos to all the single moms out there, SOMEONE has to raise the children.

Excellent points, I have taken many IQ tests and I always fall between 118-125. These tests are only partly based on education and memory.

Justin your so right, so many young men think they can get more pussy if they just fight for the girls side, but thankfully there are many that are like us, strong and dominant, and want nothing to do with those feminist pigs.

Ladies, before you start harping, strong does not mean beating up women or degrading them, it simply means we don’t put up with BS, not from you, not from anyone.

In my office, I am considered the “hard ass” of the bunch, one guy called me a “Gentle giant”, and guess what, all the chicks in my office flirt with me constantly. I play the game, but I never get suckered into the BS, and I get major respect for it.

Time for all men to take a stand.

Justin said:

They like a MAN who is stand up and is dominant.. the guy just needs to get over it :)</blockquote

You might want to check the grammar honey. It’s not very impressive you little cutie.

His misogyny is so childish I find myself just wanting to pinch his face and offer him icecream. I mean come on, no one can take this seriously, he’s just a little sweetie

He’s just a sweet ass boy who thinks if he puts his name and number out there all women will think he stands up for them and he thinks he will get laid more, try again :) Im a male, im dominant, im an asshole by nature, and women love it. Why would women want to date women? They like a MAN who is stand up and is dominant.. the guy just needs to get over it :)

Justin said:

HAHAHAHA THE GUY AT THE end. What a funny little bitch, I mean come on dude seriously? Your gonna call and try and stand up for all women when you were just blabbling on and on and on just like a girl? Are you serious? Why not make your point like a MAN and then hang up the phone. And the part about his just trying to get popular and him just wanting to get hits? Hey, ya know hes right, he didn’t shove it down anyones throat. I garuntee more women buy his book then men, and for the popular part “Yea, put this is on your website” sounds like someone else is trying to get some popularity if you ask me.

That pussy was a certified ‘Anglo-Fag’ – an weak Anglo-American male with mummy issues who puts all cunts on a pedestal.

no manhole said:

Irony said:

You can’t LEARN to do an IQ test you tit.

But if you have an education the more likely you are to do better on it, at least the one I took. I remember one of the learned intelligence questions was who wrote Faust, which I blew. An MD I know got it right. This result maybe consistent with why this individual is an MD and why I am not. If I was an MD, I’d have all the chicks I want. Oh well.

But then, educated people tend to be more intelligent anyway.

Irony said:

You can’t LEARN to do an IQ test you tit.

But if you have an education the more likely you are to do better on it, at least the one I took. I remember one of the learned intelligence questions was who wrote Faust, which I blew. An MD I know got it right. This result maybe consistent with why this individual is an MD and why I am not. If I was an MD, I’d have all the chicks I want. Oh well.

Wow that last caller is a fucking queer.

Kelly B said:

BUT, if you would like an explanation for why men score higher it could most likely be because men have more of an opportunity to attend university (and recieve other such types of higher education)

You can’t LEARN to do an IQ test you tit.

HAHAHAHA THE GUY AT THE end. What a funny little bitch, I mean come on dude seriously? Your gonna call and try and stand up for all women when you were just blabbling on and on and on just like a girl? Are you serious? Why not make your point like a MAN and then hang up the phone. And the part about his just trying to get popular and him just wanting to get hits? Hey, ya know hes right, he didn’t shove it down anyones throat. I garuntee more women buy his book then men, and for the popular part “Yea, put this is on your website” sounds like someone else is trying to get some popularity if you ask me.

I just want to beat the shit out of the last caller. I think he was raised by a single mom.

Kelly B said:

Sorry, I could not resist this one.

You do realize that IQ tests do not actually measure intelligence right? As a psychology major I know this first hand, especially from taking psychology history courses. They were created in times of recruitment for war and figuring out mental retardation.

BUT, if you would like an explanation for why men score higher it could most likely be because men have more of an opportunity to attend university (and recieve other such types of higher education) than women because they do not have to worry about such things as giving birth and childrearing, etc.

Stop being so ignorant… seriously. Don’t argue or put women down unless it’s based on something more factual…

There is NO EVIDENCE men are smarter or better, or whatever else you want to dream up, than women.

The sooner you realize it, the sooner you can move on with your life and stop being so pathetic.

While lots of people with high IQs achieve nothing, people who do activities widely considered to demand high intelligence (software development, theoretical physics, analytical philosophy, Grand Master level chess, advanced engineering and other fields dominated by white/Jewish/Asian males) ALWAYS have high IQs, usually very high.

no manhole said:

Kelly B said:

Sorry, I could not resist this one.

You do realize that IQ tests do not actually measure intelligence right? As a psychology major I know this first hand, especially from taking psychology history courses. They were created in times of recruitment for war and figuring out mental retardation.

BUT, if you would like an explanation for why men score higher it could most likely be because men have more of an opportunity to attend university (and recieve other such types of higher education) than women because they do not have to worry about such things as giving birth and childrearing, etc.

Stop being so ignorant… seriously. Don’t argue or put women down unless it’s based on something more factual…

There is NO EVIDENCE men are smarter or better, or whatever else you want to dream up, than women.

The sooner you realize it, the sooner you can move on with your life and stop being so pathetic.

I took a form of the test twice: once an adult, one as a child. (Interestingly, I got the same score both times). Anyway, what I remember in the form I took, half the test was devoted to testing learned intelligence, the other half was for innate intelligence. I remember two sections of the innate one; one was called digit span, where the tester showed you a set of numbers for a few moments and you would had to recall them. Another (I forget the name) is where you assemble picture cards to tell a story. I guess the theory is no amount of education could help you improve your abilities to do well on these sections so I would think at least for some tests, there are sections which score on innate intelligence which should be independent of education.

That distinction in intelligence is the ‘fluid’ and ‘crystallised’ distinction. Fluid intelligence is innate, crystallised intelligence is predicated upon education.

Kelly B said:

Sorry, I could not resist this one.

You do realize that IQ tests do not actually measure intelligence right? As a psychology major I know this first hand, especially from taking psychology history courses. They were created in times of recruitment for war and figuring out mental retardation.

BUT, if you would like an explanation for why men score higher it could most likely be because men have more of an opportunity to attend university (and recieve other such types of higher education) than women because they do not have to worry about such things as giving birth and childrearing, etc.

Stop being so ignorant… seriously. Don’t argue or put women down unless it’s based on something more factual…

There is NO EVIDENCE men are smarter or better, or whatever else you want to dream up, than women.

The sooner you realize it, the sooner you can move on with your life and stop being so pathetic.

I took a form of the test twice: once an adult, one as a child. (Interestingly, I got the same score both times). Anyway, what I remember in the form I took, half the test was devoted to testing learned intelligence, the other half was for innate intelligence. I remember two sections of the innate one; one was called digit span, where the tester showed you a set of numbers for a few moments and you would had to recall them. Another (I forget the name) is where you assemble picture cards to tell a story. I guess the theory is no amount of education could help you improve your abilities to do well on these sections so I would think at least for some tests, there are sections which score on innate intelligence which should be independent of education.

You’re as blind as you are stupid.

Killswitch Engage – The End of Heartache

You’re as blind as you are stupid.

Killswitch Engage – The End of Heartache

Sorry, I could not resist this one.

You do realize that IQ tests do not actually measure intelligence right? As a psychology major I know this first hand, especially from taking psychology history courses. They were created in times of recruitment for war and figuring out mental retardation.

BUT, if you would like an explanation for why men score higher it could most likely be because men have more of an opportunity to attend university (and recieve other such types of higher education) than women because they do not have to worry about such things as giving birth and childrearing, etc.

Stop being so ignorant… seriously. Don’t argue or put women down unless it’s based on something more factual…

There is NO EVIDENCE men are smarter or better, or whatever else you want to dream up, than women.

The sooner you realize it, the sooner you can move on with your life and stop being so pathetic.

To the woman that wanted some statistical data:

“There were twice as many men with IQ scores of 125, for example, a level said to correspond with people getting first-class degrees.

At scores of 155, associated with genius, there were 5.5 men for every woman.”

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/4183166.stm