studioline said:

Dawn said:

I wasn’t trying to erase the issue at all, I thought you made a valid point.
I’m 21, I still have a lot of learning to do…

Ok, if so then learn what I just wote before and if you have questions ask them – learning is about asking questions, isn’t it? The point is you won’t find the ansewrs in the Social Matrix, becasue it supposed to “fuck” your brain in the first place, so you fail, only acting as you allay.
Earlier you wrote a double standrd, and realy it goes like this; if a womam get hit by a man, he goes to jail even if he didn’t do it, just because she felt like saying so. If a men gets hit by a woman, and if,if he admits it, he will only be lought at. Of course you can pretend like you don’t know it. Are you still suprised that men get pissed off?

No, I get it, you’re completely right, it’s true. If a man’s wife starts beating him, punching him, kicking him, he is expected to just take it, he’s not even allowed to fight back or even protect himself or the woman will claim that HE assaulted HER.
Makes complete sense now…thanks

irlandes said:

Tell me again, idiots one and all, how the evil patriarchy forced all those women on the Titanic to stand on deck singing hymns while the men took all the lifeboats, and the captain ordered any woman shot who tried to get in a lifeboat.

Some years ago, I challenged anyone anywhere to write a believable science fiction story, describing a slave society on any planet in the Universe, where the slaves were so valuable that their masters would voluntarily go down with the ship so the slaves would be saved. I am still waiting.

In fact, at every point in history, women have had the best treatment their society had to offer. If women had it rough, men had it rougher. If women worked long hours in the home, men worked at physically deblitating, dangerous jobs.

Read MIDDLETOWN USA, the sociology primer for the US, back in the 20’s. There is a chapter in that book telling just how dangerous the jobs were. The manager of a factory joked (hee, hee joked) that he kept a wagon by the door to cart off the maimed and injured male workers. He had one machine which ripped off an average of one hand a month.

The average man had a lengthy injury absence every so many years. Not only would no woman have accepted such a job, but the neighbors would have lynched any man who told his wife to apply for such a job.

Ignorant and stupid men and women today judge history by what they see today. Jobs in those days were simply beyond the capacity of most women, as strong as most women were then. Today, when women sit around nice, a/c offices, wearing their Victoria’s Secret underwear, they really believe there was an evil discrimination against women in the workplace in those days.

Great story man!;)

son of the suns said:

Imagine the trouble saved if we could simply kill to the last body these social programming post-modern scum who brainwash moron females.

After all.. the truth is on our side.

Elou,
And we can and it’s very simple and I can tell how to anyone who asks. We men just do not realize how simple it is. Of course it’s on our side.

Tell me again, idiots one and all, how the evil patriarchy forced all those women on the Titanic to stand on deck singing hymns while the men took all the lifeboats, and the captain ordered any woman shot who tried to get in a lifeboat.

Some years ago, I challenged anyone anywhere to write a believable science fiction story, describing a slave society on any planet in the Universe, where the slaves were so valuable that their masters would voluntarily go down with the ship so the slaves would be saved. I am still waiting.

In fact, at every point in history, women have had the best treatment their society had to offer. If women had it rough, men had it rougher. If women worked long hours in the home, men worked at physically deblitating, dangerous jobs.

Read MIDDLETOWN USA, the sociology primer for the US, back in the 20’s. There is a chapter in that book telling just how dangerous the jobs were. The manager of a factory joked (hee, hee joked) that he kept a wagon by the door to cart off the maimed and injured male workers. He had one machine which ripped off an average of one hand a month.

The average man had a lengthy injury absence every so many years. Not only would no woman have accepted such a job, but the neighbors would have lynched any man who told his wife to apply for such a job.

Ignorant and stupid men and women today judge history by what they see today. Jobs in those days were simply beyond the capacity of most women, as strong as most women were then. Today, when women sit around nice, a/c offices, wearing their Victoria’s Secret underwear, they really believe there was an evil discrimination against women in the workplace in those days.

Imagine the trouble saved if we could simply kill to the last body these social programming post-modern scum who brainwash moron females.

After all.. the truth is on our side.

Dawn said:

I wasn’t trying to erase the issue at all, I thought you made a valid point.
I’m 21, I still have a lot of learning to do…

Ok, if so then learn what I just wote before and if you have questions ask them – learning is about asking questions, isn’t it? The point is you won’t find the ansewrs in the Social Matrix, becasue it supposed to “fuck” your brain in the first place, so you fail, only acting as you allay.
Earlier you wrote a double standrd, and realy it goes like this; if a womam get hit by a man, he goes to jail even if he didn’t do it, just because she felt like saying so. If a men gets hit by a woman, and if,if he admits it, he will only be lought at. Of course you can pretend like you don’t know it. Are you still suprised that men get pissed off?

The name Michael is a misnomer. The correct spelling is Michelle. I hate people who lie.

This has been posted on other URL’s, but a while ago, I looked out my window here in the mountains of Mexico. Everything I can see out there was made by men, 100%, except an old junk car in the neighbors land. I understand in the US there are female assemblers, so I have to admit that car might have had female contributions, as much as 0.05%.

Every other thing; electric wires; houses; buildings; telephone wires; the road itself; the fences; the concrete posts; the water system; all made 100% by men. If all the work of vile, evil, inferior, worthless, violent men was removed from this village of 12,000, there would be no visible sign of human habitation.

Even the house itself, mostly concrete, sand, gravel, and re-bar, was almost 100% made by men. Not just the construction of the house, but the mining and foundry work for the metal; also the sand and gravel was quarried by men, 100%.

There are a few things in the house, such as electronics, that may have had female assembly. But, they were all invented by men and the factories were built by men, and the infrastructure to run the factories was built by men.

And, that is the way it is all over the world. Without evil men the human race would never have left the stone age. And, in places where women rule, except for goodies imported from the societies where men are allowed to produce things, they are in the Stone Age, too. I refer even to places like East Saint Louis where women rule, not just darkest Africa.

As far as historic oppression of women, I am reminded of my eldest daughter. She was raised with no male influence because her mom was a vile witch, and I divorced her. Even though my daughter admitted as an adult her life would have been much better if I had won custody, I did not.

When she met her current husband, around 15 years ago, in the Air Farce in Spain, and he proposed marriage, she told him she would never cook for him because any woman who cooks for her husband is his slave. And, the fool married her, anyway.

Eventually, he was discharged from the Air Farce as a radar technician, because all the promotions went to dearies, such as her. She was a very high priced, highly qualified typist. Unlike radar technicians who grow on every cactus, typists are so frickin’ hard to find…

He got a high paying job as FAA radar technician. She got a better than minimum wage job as a typist person.

After a time, she decided she wanted to have kids. He agreed. When she got pregnant, she got a burst of maternal hormones, and concluded she wanted to stay home with her baby when it was born. He said, sure, if they had a budget he could handle it with his good job.

As the time got closer, she began to realize it made no sense for her to be home all day and do no work while he was gone all day. So, she told him she would learn to cook. He told her he had promised he would cook and he would. But, she really figured out it made no sense to sit around while he was at work all day, then he had to do the work when he got home.

it slowly soaked into her stupid, thick head that women historically were not at all subjugated, oppressed, repressed, and enslaved. They were at home with their kids BEAUSE THAT IS WHERE THEY WANTED TO BE. And, they did the housework because in those days men went to work 70 or more hours a week, and there was no time left for them to run home and do all the housework while cupcake sat around doing exactly nothing. It was purely logical for the woman to do all the housework while the man earned all the money. It is called a division of labors, and only a psychotic feminist, whether male or female, would be unable to understand that simple concept.

Now, she brooks no nonsense from stupid men and women who believe women were historically enslaved.

studioline said:

Dawn said:

Ok, good point, but everything you just wrote applies to a lot of women too…what about all the women that get the shit beat out of them by their boyfriends/husbands, and have to hide in fear for the rest of their lives…? I feel for them, but it’s not going to make me pissed off at all men…I could understand if I had laughed at someone’s post, or called them gay, or went on some kind of angry rant where “fuck” is every second word, but I haven’t….some of the points about women on here are very valid.

I thought that you were inteligent, but you did not undestand a word form what I just wrote. Do you think you can erase the issue with a couter argument, deny it, pretend you don’t understand? I wrote you the answer because you rised the question, and if I didn’t, you would not find that answer in Cosmo magazine or anywhere else in the Social Matrix. But now at least you can’t say, you still don’t know the answer. And it was written here, on this site.

I wasn’t trying to erase the issue at all, I thought you made a valid point. I’m 21, I still have a lot of learning to do…

Dawn said:

Ok, good point, but everything you just wrote applies to a lot of women too…what about all the women that get the shit beat out of them by their boyfriends/husbands, and have to hide in fear for the rest of their lives…? I feel for them, but it’s not going to make me pissed off at all men…I could understand if I had laughed at someone’s post, or called them gay, or went on some kind of angry rant where “fuck” is every second word, but I haven’t….some of the points about women on here are very valid.

I thought that you were inteligent, but you did not undestand a word form what I just wrote. Do you think you can erase the issue with a couter argument, deny it, pretend you don’t understand? I wrote you the answer because you rised the question, and if I didn’t, you would not find that answer in Cosmo magazine or anywhere else in the Social Matrix. But now at least you can’t say, you still don’t know the answer. And it was written here, on this site.

studioline said:

Dawn said:

Why are so many men on here so angry? Yeesh, what did I say to piss you off so much?

@Dawn;

Hey,

Because Men have been abused for past 30 plus years. Imagine being abused that long, and not even being able to speak up. Imagine being humiliated for that long and not even having the right to say it. And imagine that a reasn for being abused could be amnong many for ex just being perfect or too ideal, or even simply too “nice”. And what women do when they finally hear us speak? They lough, deny it, act suprized, threat us in various ways, call us gay and so on… There goes you answer!

Ok, good point, but everything you just wrote applies to a lot of women too…what about all the women that get the shit beat out of them by their boyfriends/husbands, and have to hide in fear for the rest of their lives…? I feel for them, but it’s not going to make me pissed off at all men…I could understand if I had laughed at someone’s post, or called them gay, or went on some kind of angry rant where “fuck” is every second word, but I haven’t….some of the points about women on here are very valid.

Dawn said:

Why are so many men on here so angry? Yeesh, what did I say to piss you off so much?

@Dawn;

Hey,

Because Men have been abused for past 30 plus years. Imagine being abused that long, and not even being able to speak up. Imagine being humiliated for that long and not even having the right to say it. And imagine that a reasn for being abused could be amnong many for ex just being perfect or too ideal, or even simply too “nice”. And what women do when they finally hear us speak? They lough, deny it, act suprized, threat us in various ways, call us gay and so on… There goes you answer!

Dillard T. Wanker said:

Dawn said:

Why are so many men on here so angry? Yeesh, what did I say to piss you off so much?

You posted here, and continue to post here. Now get the fuck out.

Relax Dillard, it’s not like I’m disagreeing with what Dick’s saying…I haven’t been bitchy or whiny, and I have yet to use “you’re gay” as a plausible argument, so I think you can tolerate me for awhile…maybe concentrate on getting the crazy, ranting and cursing women out of here first

Necro - 86 Measures of Game

One that preaches the truth…

I have a new mind blowing theory on females and love I’ll post later in the general forum.

Michael said:

I think it’s important, however, to address why poronography exists. I believe it is because the male sexual needs are not being satisfied in some basic fashion by females

No manhole, no offense, but you are a fucking idiot. Rest assured, men’s sexual needs today are being satisfied on a historical scale never before known to civilization. Pornography is mainstream. If you don’t believe that that mainstream porn equates to mens sexual needs being able to be satisfied at any time, then I can’t fucking imagine what your opinion on the Victorian age would be.

Pornography exists because men have more power than women. Period.

Then why are women getting paid for it then? Quite frankly no one forced the women to participate, they do it on their own will for either money or the enjoyment of sex. Not only there are genres of porn tailored to the excitement of women, so that doesn’t make sense at all. Of course I’ve learned not to expect you to but still.

son of the suns said:

I never thought I would know anyone as skullfucked as Michelle that would make NMH look like a Taliban.

Thats the nicest thing you ever said about me. The Taliban, though? Ill get Ill just go out and mindlessly start to collect stones.

Oh, BTW, I want to thank you and Muzalon for your making me aware of the rising fundamentalist Islamic tide. I got “America alone” and its a fascinating read. I might vote for McCain. Thanks again.

I never thought I would know anyone as skullfucked as Michelle that would make NMH look like a Taliban.

If women were emotionally superior they’d be capable of fidelity, Michelle.

Not only are we stronger and smarter.. but also deeper.

Women are good for nothing breeders… to bad they like breeding with nothing but thugs and hillbillies and can’t be allowed to continue their occupation of this planet.

Michael said:

No manhole, it’s becoming clear you have never been in a relationship and you are possibly a virgin. All men, whether they are single or in a relationship look at other women and look at porn. Whether the porn is hardcore or simply bikini models, all men look at other women’s bodies aside from the woman they may be involved with because men cannot be sexually monogamous. Porn will never disappear because of this reason and this reason alone. Porn has nothing to do with men not being sexually satisfied by a mate, what it does have something to do with is sexual gluttony.

Actually I have been in several relationships, most notably my last one was for eight years. What I noted about myself was this: when I said and did the right things to get my girl in the mood, she granted me sex. Early on, I had plenty of sex, my sexual needs were satisfied, and I had no interest in porn at all (in additional to the fact that I completely adored her). As time progressed she became convinced of her superiority over me and for this and other reasons she granted me less sex, so I resulted to porn. I really don’t think my experience is unusual. In fact, I think its the norm.

Your lack of understanding of male grievences against women suggests VERY STRONGLY to me that YOU have never been in a relationship, or your just to whipped to dare to voice your own opinion to a woman, no matter what the truth may be. If you are doing this as in fact I think you are, than you are a pathetic man.

Michael said:

Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong.

The reason women don’t act as competent as men is not because they aren’t, but because they are not as confident. They do not believe in their competence because 99% of men act towards them as if they don’t expect them to be competent (Dick’s Master Class is on exactly this).

Treating women in this manner undermines their confidence in their abilities, which makes her step back and let men take the lead. This begins at a very young age for young girls. Educators know it, which is why they now work very hard not to undermine little girls sense of what they can achieve.

Any woman who doesn’t buy into an undermined position by a man is forced into an aggressive position automatically in order to get her opinion heard and taken seriously. She of course is then labeled a bitch feminist. Which is simply a shaming strategy, again designed to get her to shut up so a man appears more competent than her.

Men who win through bullying and undermining only prove they are competent manipulators of reality, nothing more.

The numbers go against what your saying. As you know, there are more women entering college than men than ever before–I have never thought that women are, overall, less competent than men (like most men here seem to think), and the numbers support this idea. Also, they suggest if there is any attempt for men to subjugate women than its failing miserably. Some writers have called this increase of women over men in certain professional ranks (medicine, law) the “new girl order” Interestingly, you seem to be ignoring the fact that young men, despite their innate IQ-descriptive abilities, are following behind, as countless cultural authors have observed. Why is this? Well, its because of our feminized culture that seeks to devalue men and feminize them (See Christina Hoff Sommers book “The War against Boys”).

Yea, sure, some men try to bully women. I think far more often than that men are held in thrall to women, and do and say anything as to not disturb them, so they are able to get sex b/c its in such short supply from their relatively frigid wives. Going to laugh at this as well, moron? How about if you read Thomas Ellis’s book “The rantings of a Single male”, for an opinion here?

You are terribly uninfromed.