I am shutting this site down.

Chris=Mr. Empty-pants: http://www.maleenhancement.org/

absogygoomb
ap5d
Laraffido
rwgf

Was your mom mean to you? If she wasn’t why the hell do you have to be such a DICK….. go to HELL!!!!

Dick, you should know by now that women can’t assimilate dissenting opinion. If it is contrary to the misinformation taught to them in college, they become irrational whores.

My solution: Give them a nice golden shower. They love it.

A group is basically a number of men speaking in the same voice.

no manhole Says: I promise to never post again if both you and Studioline join the forums

NOOOOOOOO….Who is going to be my partner in crime…in cereal killing! ;)

@Arbalest-there is some interest in forming some kind of group to lead to changes in how society regards men (Dont worry, Im not going to be involved with this–I’m too busy with shit). Anyway, it seems to me that you make a great leader or co-leader —-I’m not joking. I would like to suggest that you join the forums (if you have not done so) so you can exchange messages with Studioline because he is interested in the group thing too.

To sweeten the deal even further, I promise to never post again if both you and Studioline join the forums, except if Commander Scott of some other pseudo-intellectual posts. Best of luck to both of you.

@Studioline- I will not be part of the group. I am too busy and too contraversial (which means I piss too many people off). Good luck.

Thanks again, for your heart No manhole,

Ok, let’s see what Arbalest has to say about it.
And let’s see what other men have to say about it too.

In the mean time I wannna share something;

Recently I watched a documentary about rastamen. How does it relate to a group idea? It does. There is a group of Jamaican men living on the beach in Negril. Women come there from around the world and pay these men 150 usd, to suck on their dicks – same women which return home after 2 weeks of vacations and they say to you guys that they would never suck a men’s dick and they demand a respect, but tha’t not that much impotant, what they say. Important is that these men exist because they have a group. They have a certain ideology of that group. If you listen to them, you would think they don’t make any sense whatsoever, the nonsense they are saying about rasta philosophy is pure nonsense. The point is even if you don’t make any sense but you have a group behind you it still works. Now imagine that there is a group which want literally save women’s souls, lives, asses, orgasms and so on, and them women actually are waiting for this to happen but because they are women, they only know how to screw things up, that’s why they can not save thamselves, and they desperately need men as a group to do this for them. Now my second point is – wtf are you guys still waiting for????? This is amazing for me altrough I fully understand why, just I can’t accept it.

Can’t you just fucking type on your computer keyboard “Im into that group too” and then press submit comment? I won’t be waiting for you forever.

@Studioline- one way I think you can exchange messages on this site is by singing up into “Forums”–so thats your first step (if you have not done so): sign up for Forums.

@Studioline– I strongly suggest you form some kind of group, your heart is there, its clear. I also would like to suggest, if I may that you form it with Arbalest. What little I know about you two, you both have the interest and excitement for it, and about the right amount of temperment (somewhere between moderate and radical). I urge you in some fashion to exchange e-mails with Arbalest and do something about this. I agree–you cant just stand back and go your own way. I wish you both the very best.

Thank you No manhole

Like I told before and as you know, I didn’t come to this site with an intention at all to form a group or be a leader. I was takling about a group, just becasue it is so obvious idea to me….. and I thaught it is obvious idea to you guys. Just by doing it you guys would achieve anything you wanted, just by sticking to the idea and the plan. Maybe now afer I first lost hope and now I see one healthy man, who can see it I shoud consider a group idea again.

When I lost hope that a group can exist I had to think why it is so strange idea for men? And then I recalled a story with Jusus. Fuck!. Men always had problems with making a group. As soon as you have a leader who wants to save your soul, you gonna hate him, betray him, and watch him die, just because you can’t stand an idea that someone wants good for you and so, has to “lead” you there. Now I see why God makes you suffer – to wake up and see the group idea.

Before I make any decisions I want first to see if there are other men who can believe. Look for ex even at “Star Wars”, there is a grup idea shown. There is no idea of “every man for himself” and even Darth Vader finally comes to this conclusion… It is so obvious that nothing can be more obvious. But if you/us don’t make a group, you won’t blame any god or women, you will only at the end have to blame yourself.

studioline said:

in responce

why women always win even if they don’t make any sense? because they have a group

why men always lose? because they are “every man for himself”

as long as it stays that way, you guys will aways get fucked big time.

I agree. Form a group, Studioline. Its your destiny.

in responce

why women always win even if they don’t make any sense? because they have a group

why men always lose? because they are “every man for himself”

as long as it stays that way, you guys will aways get fucked big time.

I wondering if a disadvantage of the “every man for himself” attitude, whether it be a marriage strike or MGTOW, is the cause of the decline of western civilization. How this may occur is if this MGTOW attitude leads to a poor birth rate compared to cultures that don’t have that attitude, then western civ could collapse and the dawn of a new cultural dark ages might begin where men and women are ruled via pre-enlightenment values.

So if we “go our own way”, do we end up fucking over our children and grandchildren (the few that we have) that believe in western civ, as they will be controlled under totalitarian non-enlightenment (ie fundamentalist muslim) governments? What it comes down to may be this: Do our present attitudes (feminist for women, abandonment of western women for men) lead to future generations suffering under theocracies?

I’m not saying that men should marry shrews. But I think some kind of awareness needs to occur in women that their attitudes made leave to the collapse of western civ as I believe some pundits (Pat Buchanan comes to mind) have predicted. But it seems that except for the few women that appear to have gotten a view good shots of fetal testosterone that this logic (if what I said could be considered that) would not move them.

Group? Everyone thinks of groups first thing. Men have been trying to counter feminism with groups for well over 40 years. Groups don’t work.

There has never been a time in the last 40 years without a lot of groups.

Most men will not do anything. They will go to group meetings, but the minute group leader(s) start to achieve anything, those who aren’t willing to do anything attack; attack; attack. Until the group is destroyed then the destroyers wander off, pontificating, “I knew they weren’t going to achieve anything.”

Debating with women also accomplishes nothing. We have been debating with women for over 40 years. You can have the perfect logic, so perfect a woman will admit you are right, but the next two words out of her mouth after she realizes you are correct, are, “Yes, but…” and continues her defective logic because she simply does not care if you are right, she wants her own way.

The so-called marriage strike is working to some extent. Also, the MGTOW concept, which is really a way of life.

Not every man need avoid marriage to change things. In the early 70’s there was a major gasoline shortage. No gas? Not so. There was a very small shortage. Ditto for a marriage strike. Many men can marry each year, as long as their is shortage compared to the demand to marry by women.

Marriage strike and MGTOW work because there is no leader for every man and woman in town to attack; attack; attack. It is literally every man for himself.

So, what does marriage strike mean? That is up to you; don’t let any firebrand speaker tell you what to do. If to you, it means love ‘em, and leave ‘em, well, you decide what risks to take, and you pay the price and reap the benefits. IF it means take sex vacations once a year to foreign countries, that is your decision. If it means expat to a man friendly nation, so be it.

In fact, that is also what MGTOW means. Don’t be a follower. Don’t let your mommy tell you what to do, nor another man. Do what feels right. Sure, you can learn from others, but always make up your own mind based on your unique wants; needs; feelings; and so forth. Don’t get married unless you well understand the high probabilities for disaster.

Keb said:

CallMeCowgirl Says:I don’t know if they’re pissed off that I agree with you guys, or feel like I’m betraying my “own kind�

They hate to hear the truth, which causes them to go into attack mode. They are the “self hating bitches”. They know it and hate to admit it.

words of truth

CallMeCowgirl Says:I don’t know if they’re pissed off that I agree with you guys, or feel like I’m betraying my “own kind�

They hate to hear the truth, which causes them to go into attack mode. They are the “self hating bitches”. They know it and hate to admit it.

CMC

I feel you

Not when you show them a competence about men, providing that you first learn and become competent.

studioline said:

Great, then;)

So start with supporting me with explaing this to girls who are confuzed writeing posts on this site. Ill lead you through. You are a woman they will trust you more. Then you will get some practice how to talk to women about this when you talk to them in the reality. You will be like a Guru to them;) You are now more advanced than they would ever be if no one would break the news to them. If you won’t be too sure what to do or wtire to them, write on me a message first under this thread. Ok?

p.s. watch only the original matrix movie cos part 2 and 3 are not that valuable

I don’t think I’d get much farther than any of the men here have at trying to explain things to some of these women. They’re on attack mode it seems. Some of them seem to be watching every post I make just so they can pick it apart and attempt to bring me down. I don’t know if they’re pissed off that I agree with you guys, or feel like I’m betraying my “own kind” but I have no idea how I could possibly talk any sense into them without being called a “self hating bitch”

Canadian and American women are selfish, ignorant cunts whose panties are tightly wedged up their assholes.

@ No manhole

I think some guys think of me I wanna be some kind of a leader. lol. When I first came to this site I thought I will write just few posts, write to you all there is to it cos it’s really not that much, and maybe practice some english skills;)

And I would hate if you guys resented my ideas just for the reason that preasumably I want to be a smart ass or some kind of a leader. Can you imagine a leader who is living not in the US and english is his second languague? lol.

I just happen to know the ansewrs to all your problems out there and all I want to just help you out guys out there. That’s the whole mistery solved. I have been there myself, where you are at, believe me. As much as I wish I did a site myself I can’t right now.

I dont want a group to be my group. I just have all the steaps that need to be taken in my mind and Im giving them to you and one element which is necessary is a group. You guys need to create a group. Either now or later under this site or a different one. But you can’t just sit there and hope for a change, ior to postpone it, cos no one will do it for you. That’s why Im struggling so much to unite you under a group. The group can do different things like maybe support Dick M. I dont know what his plans are. But the best way to find this out is to ask him. How you do it? Well first of all you have to declare a group. Then present that group to him that it exists and then he will respond and then you will know. All it takes is just a vote. Women are good to if they qualify, it makes the group more credible in case of presenting it to some public circle. There seems to be already one as you can see. I asked a woman and ironically she said cool count me in. Now Im asking you guys. Are you voting yes?

@ Muzalon

I feel you man

Ok first. I really hate telling you that this part of your equation is not correct. I hate to say it because you are clearly an inteligent men who I like. But I have to adress it somehow and being direct is the best way.

Ok you say it’s a problem with Anglo-American, women as a part of your culture. Coincidently you give a name of japanese like sounding last name. Is it really any different in Japan for ex, for that matter? How many dominatrixes are runnig across Japan? You would be suprized, how bitchy thay are to japanese men.

Your women, American ones are the easiest to wake them up. I don’t say and never said “chnge or convince” them, it’s a wrong term. Also for ex every women will tell you it’s impossible to change or convince them.

Ill make my point short. They are already convinced. You men are just assumint they are not, so they act the way you expect them to. Call it mental trick, call it the way woman’s mind works, I don’t care how you explain it to yourself. But you guys must take this part down right in your mind. Otherwise day afer day wou will be doing inteligent mental circles. We already talked about this as I recall even under the same thread of Voicemail #8. Let’s say it again – outloud: The door is alredy open!

Muzalon said:

I think there is a problem with Anglo-American culture: these issues are just part of it. Google Fukuyama’s ‘The Great Disruption’.

Looks good, thanks.

@Studioline- I see nothing wrong with a little discussion of plans, if any plans are out there.

Also, I think you should consider that people are on this site for different reasons. Some guys are here to learn. Some guys are here to slam women because this site gives them a chance, as you really cant do this in regular life. I feel that not all guys are here to follow a leader. But if I am wrong, please feel free to correct me.

Also keep in mind that I think Dick Masterson’s major goal is to sell a book. Although he has provided us with a forum to speak, he maybe doing this mostly for advertisement of his book and other synthesis of his.

I would like to suggest that you talk directly with Dick about setting up some kind of site on your own, much like “Victorian Lady’ did with Lady Lessons, a site associated with MABTW:

http://ladylessons.mabtw.com/

I think there is a problem with Anglo-American culture: these issues are just part of it. Google Fukuyama’s ‘The Great Disruption’.

@ No manhole

It’s good you are asking but why for god’s sake you are asking at random? If guys would respond to you with a plan – by writeing a plan I wolud be all happy myself. But I bet you just have opened another pandora’s box so to speak and now most guys will start arguing and insulting each other, most of them aiming to be the smartest man. On the other hand if you ask me a question Ill ansewr to you, like I told you before.

Other than that, great spirit, I knew this thought will grow in you,

respect,

Muzalon said:

studioline said:

The world can be saved in a very easy way. Just like you understood, other women will too. They already know/ “feel” it. They just don’t know how the fuck this happend. They just can not put all the pieces of the puzzle together. There is a war out there, but emenies are not men and women. It’s us people against the matrix. Now there are 2 gropus of people these who are aware and those who are not. Those who are not are like “Agent Smiths”

Geez this so much resebles the movie “Matrix”. Thanks to it, it’s so much easier to explain this now, And also it’s a proof that we are not alone. Many others know it too. They are just affraid and feel helpless because thay are against the Social Matrix, which seems to be so big and powerfull, but really is not. That’s where the saing “There is nothing to fear just he fear itself” comes form. Do you know fables? The funny part is that most of the wisdom is encripted in them:) Do you remmeber the fable about a king who was naked but no one was dare to say it outloud?

That all is why I say the first steap is a grup. Then you won’t feel like helpless and only one. Will you be with me?

This Matrix you speak of is really called the Hegemony. It is the ideological cement that makes things ‘normal’ and binds the consent of the masses to the existing social order. Each cultural bloc has its own. The Anglo bloc has a distinctly matriarchal hegemony that derives from its puritanical origins. Until you address this, your attempt to change things will be confounded.

My question to anybody:

What is it that men want changed? And how is this done? It would seem to me this is so complex, it may need some categorization. So let me try a little here. There are things having to do with a.) laws and b.) attitudes.

With a.) it seems these things are pretty easy to define, like the misandrous laws on the books. Here, to elicit change, I would imagine you need cadres of hard working, dedicated people, including lawyers. A leader may be a male possibly analogous of Catherine MacKinnon; a man possibly in academia who goes to Congressional hearing that leads the charge for change, for example.

And now, b.) Do we want to change womens attitudes? And to what degree? This seems far more difficult to define.

Many men are on here because women have frustrated them with the so called “pussy power” which I guess is men agreeing to women’s bad behavior because, outside rape, they control the amount of sex we have.
So how is this combated? Should all men say “we want to be treated as equals”. Although I have not thought about this too carefully, I would think in order for this plan to succeed, that you would need a majority of every single guy out there to renounce women. The reason is if one man renounces a woman, shell just run to a more accepting man. To me, getting a major block of men to renounce women would seem to be an unlikely situation, and I think in this reality, one must ask, should we commit to such a plan? I’m not saying “surrender”, but I think it should be discussed if this is a reasonable plan at all? Are there other plans worth considering?

Another possibility is if the attack is lead first through a.) then awareness of b.) might occur and make things easier for men to change in the future.

I’m just throwing out ideas here if anybody gives a shit….

What the fuck is this a conspiracy theory web site now get the fuck out of here

@ Muzalon

From logical standpoint you should appreciate the fact of geting some outside help. After all, how many men form the US do you know besides Dick M, who have a plan and are able to pick up their ass and actually do something about it?

respect,

Great, then;)

So start with supporting me with explaing this to girls who are confuzed writeing posts on this site. Ill lead you through. You are a woman they will trust you more. Then you will get some practice how to talk to women about this when you talk to them in the reality. You will be like a Guru to them;) You are now more advanced than they would ever be if no one would break the news to them. If you won’t be too sure what to do or wtire to them, write on me a message first under this thread. Ok?

p.s. watch only the original matrix movie cos part 2 and 3 are not that valuable

@ Studioline

For sure I’ll be with you ;) Now I’m going to actually have to watch The Matrix movies, maybe that’ll help me understand it all a little better, lol. It’s definitely a completely different way of thinking, and it’ll take a bit of getting used to…

studioline said:

The world can be saved in a very easy way. Just like you understood, other women will too. They already know/ “feel” it. They just don’t know how the fuck this happend. They just can not put all the pieces of the puzzle together. There is a war out there, but emenies are not men and women. It’s us people against the matrix. Now there are 2 gropus of people these who are aware and those who are not. Those who are not are like “Agent Smiths”

Geez this so much resebles the movie “Matrix”. Thanks to it, it’s so much easier to explain this now, And also it’s a proof that we are not alone. Many others know it too. They are just affraid and feel helpless because thay are against the Social Matrix, which seems to be so big and powerfull, but really is not. That’s where the saing “There is nothing to fear just he fear itself” comes form. Do you know fables? The funny part is that most of the wisdom is encripted in them:) Do you remmeber the fable about a king who was naked but no one was dare to say it outloud?

That all is why I say the first steap is a grup. Then you won’t feel like helpless and only one. Will you be with me?

This Matrix you speak of is really called the Hegemony. It is the ideological cement that makes things ‘normal’ and binds the consent of the masses to the existing social order. Each cultural bloc has its own. The Anglo bloc has a distinctly matriarchal hegemony that derives from its puritanical origins. Until you address this, your attempt to change things will be confounded.

The world can be saved in a very easy way. Just like you understood, other women will too. They already know/ “feel” it. They just don’t know how the fuck this happend. They just can not put all the pieces of the puzzle together. There is a war out there, but emenies are not men and women. It’s us people against the matrix. Now there are 2 gropus of people these who are aware and those who are not. Those who are not are like “Agent Smiths”

Geez this so much resebles the movie “Matrix”. Thanks to it, it’s so much easier to explain this now, And also it’s a proof that we are not alone. Many others know it too. They are just affraid and feel helpless because thay are against the Social Matrix, which seems to be so big and powerfull, but really is not. That’s where the saing “There is nothing to fear just he fear itself” comes form. Do you know fables? The funny part is that most of the wisdom is encripted in them:) Do you remmeber the fable about a king who was naked but no one was dare to say it outloud?

That all is why I say the first steap is a grup. Then you won’t feel like helpless and only one. Will you be with me?

@ Studioline

So I guess this website is a first step to fixing things, though most women are trying to fight it, and like you mentioned above, they’re trying to ridicule and silence the men.
It’s all starting to make sense to me, though I feel so helpless because I am only one woman…

@ CMC

This is exactly right. Im proud of you, that you are waking up from this bad dream and start seeing the matrix. Women are the biggest victims of this. The truth is that they don’t even want or need these items like designer bags and so on. Women only care and want to be happy, that’s really all they are after. And the only way to achieve this is by becoming competent about men. That is what would really set them free and give them the feeling of full self worth. Gadgets are only for compensting that lack of competence (women are so endlessly presenting themselves those gadgets as the symbol of their competence about men but as you have noticed it’s just all fake – women are living in a dream of self dception, they sleep through their whole life and never wake up, that’s why I call it the Social Matrix, after the movie).

You never heard of this concept because it’s a part of taboo that this whole present woman’s movement is just a fraud. But no one can say that it’s a fraud because it is and must be a taboo. First of all as soon as men start to speak up they are being silenced and ridiculed, so women would never find out what is really ensalving them. As long as that happens women will never wake up and the whole fraud can go on. And as a side effect of this pathology, it influances more corresponding pathologies, and I won’t list them cos you can imagine what they are but also the list of them would go on and on and on. Moreover if women won’t help us now and won’t wake up now, these pathologies will grow. All this can be reversed in a very simple way, by making women aware about the Social Matrix and competent about men. And that’s is why the Social Matrix fights women liberation movement because then women no longer would be “a client� – the batteries. It only calims to be woman’s liberation movement, but really is just a fraud a big global scam.

Can you see how nasty cirlce this is, aiming against all the humanity, and how perfect destruction mechanism it creates, that most of people even can’t see it. I mean if you have a war for ex, it’s easy to see; weapons, dead bodies and so on. But this is just like a cancer you won’t see this unless you take a closer look and become aware.

That is why I say it’s important to create a group, to make people first aware and then competent.

@ Studioline

So what steps would a woman take to find the “real her” and to lose the Persona….? I’m thinking this won’t be an easy task, though now that I somewhat understand what has happend to women over the past 40-50 years….apparently we thought we were advancing, and apparently we were wrong

@CMC

Simplyfying my brief you can say it that way too. Your general understanding of this is correct. I like the way you are figuring out what’s real and what’s not.

@studioline

Ok, let me see if I can wrap my woman brain around this concept (lol). Basically women wanted to prove that they were as competent as men, but didn’t really have any way to make themseleves feel that way, so they turned to frivoulous shopping to make themseleves feel better. Thus making their sole purpose in the social matrix to be batteries for credit cards….do I understand that right..? Correct me if I’m screwing it up, because it’s the first time I’ve ever heard this sort of concept and I’m curious.

@ CallMeCowgirl

Sure not, I dont know you so I can’t be sure for 100% if what you say its really you. If so then you are a way ahead of other “the Persona” women, cos you want to find and be real you, not the Persona. This is a sign of a strenght.

You are asking me about TSM and Batteries. ok. You are told that the feminism still exist, but’s a lie. When long time ago the feminism acomplished itself as a social movement and there was not much left to fight for there was still one main challange left, but on the personal level. Women after having equal rihgts wanted to know how to be competent about men. And that’s how the feminism changed into pseudo-feminism. All women wanted to know how to be competent about men. But women/feminism did not know the answer, but women were so hungry of that knowledge, that the feminism had to act like it knows the answer. So it changed into a pathology and it’s nobodys fault it just happened by itslef. Every given reality of a given time has it’s patology=the Social Matrix, which creates itslelf just like a cancer creates itself in a human body. The feminism evolved into a business from women’s original desire to be competent about men. But in order to keep this bisuness going, it can never tell women how to be competent becuse then it would be no business any more, cos no woman would need to be a client. Every woman wolud be happy. And that’s the problem right there. A happy woman buys less things she doesn’t really need Only unhappy woman gets more of the stuff to compensate for the lack of hapiness and that’s how women become the batteries for the Social Matrix.

Guys, let’s give her a break, if she is being real then she is the part of the solution. Understand that women are themselves in bad situation and they are the victims of The Social Matrix, not just us. The are not the enemy, only the Social Matrix is. Don’t kill the patient, just the cancer.

Elitist_Prick said:

You could start by shutting the fuck up.

If you’re not a part of the solution, you’re a part of the problem.

So should I just kill myself now then…?

You could start by shutting the fuck up.

If you’re not a part of the solution, you’re a part of the problem.

studioline said:

2 CallmeCowgirl

Im curious what you think why is that?
What I see is that the Social Matrix needs you women only as batteries for Credit Cards, which is entirely on the oposite direction of being free.

I’m still not sure what I think….I’m 22 so I still have some time to figure it out I guess. So the Social Matrix indicates women are only batteries for Credit Cards? I could see that….though I guess in the Social Matrix I would have no use at all seeing as how I don’t really do the whole shopping thing =S Does this mean I’m purposeless…? I suppose I could reproduce…

2 CallmeCowgirl

Im curious what you think why is that?
What I see is that the Social Matrix needs you women only as batteries for Credit Cards, which is entirely on the oposite direction of being free.

studioline said:

CallMeCowgirl said:

I’ve noticed a patterns with these Voicemails….a lot of infuriated redneck women call in in hopes of defending themselves, or getting the chance to get one up on Dick, but they always just end up embarassing themselves….that’s if you can even understand them to begin with =S

That’s because they are confused. So how can this be? Women after 40 years of feminism, are confused, wtf? The feminism movement died long time ago. Its now the pseudo feminism which used feminism logo, so this way it can fuck up womens brains. Women are now more ensalved than ever before. We men don’t want to eslave you as you are told. We want to free you from the Persona, Tell me; does anybody deserves respect if they are not even themselves? We men want to help you women with understanding that you don’t need the Persona and that it is enough to just be you. If this won’t change soon men will stop being or even sleeping with you. Knowing this we can’t stay indifferent. It’s easy to not give a shit. If you want to join us, you are welcomed. Just don’t be suprised, that men wont trust you in the begining, cos they lost faith in women. This is just a brief, do tell us, do you want to join us?

Definitely. I completely agree with most of the views expressed on here. Women have become so…fake over the past couple of decades I can barely stand to be in a room with them. Everything is about the designer clothes, how much money they have to spend, whose husband is more handsome and successful, and who has the nicest designer bag. The smiles are fake, the attitudes are fake, and it’s damn near impossible to link the words “genuine” and “female” together in the same sentence.

I’ll definitely be jumping on this bandwagon.

CallMeCowgirl said:

I’ve noticed a patterns with these Voicemails….a lot of infuriated redneck women call in in hopes of defending themselves, or getting the chance to get one up on Dick, but they always just end up embarassing themselves….that’s if you can even understand them to begin with =S

That’s because they are confused. So how can this be? Women after 40 years of feminism, are confused, wtf? The feminism movement died long time ago. Its now the pseudo feminism which used feminism logo, so this way it can fuck up womens brains. Women are now more ensalved than ever before. We men don’t want to eslave you as you are told. We want to free you from the Persona, Tell me; does anybody deserves respect if they are not even themselves? We men want to help you women with understanding that you don’t need the Persona and that it is enough to just be you. If this won’t change soon men will stop being or even sleeping with you. Knowing this we can’t stay indifferent. It’s easy to not give a shit. If you want to join us, you are welcomed. Just don’t be suprised, that men wont trust you in the begining, cos they lost faith in women. This is just a brief, do tell us, do you want to join us?

I’ve noticed a patterns with these Voicemails….a lot of infuriated redneck women call in in hopes of defending themselves, or getting the chance to get one up on Dick, but they always just end up embarassing themselves….that’s if you can even understand them to begin with =S

Im glad you agree, then just do it.
And each time you do it realize that you are increasing the number of real women ( like the one you refered as one in twenty) by 1 and also decreasing by 1 the number of the Persona – a bitch who assumes everyone wants her pussy.

And then report it here so other men can do the same. So one day soon we can do it all together as a group action, and that day their pussy power will crumble overnight. We will tell them that tere is a new group of men, they are not either gay and they don’t want their pussy.

And other men can and should do the same. Without telling a female; I don’t want your pussy, takling or writing at her is totally pointless, because they assume that you want her pussy, so it doesn’t matter what she does or says, you still want it, and you do whatever because you want it. This assumption comes from The Social Matrix that has programmed this asumption into females mind. They do not know that you don’t want it as long as she is the Persona, that’s why you have to tell them that.

After that one day we wake up and we won’t have to wonder which one is the one in twenty or one in thousand, they all will be real women. Tey all will wake up as princesses form a fable, and this is exactly what they are waiting for. It’s that simple.

Im glad you agree, then just do it.

And each time you do it realize that you are increasing the number of real women ( like the one u refered as one in twenty) by 1 and also decreasing by 1 the number of the Persona – a bitch who assumes everyone wants her pussy.

And then report it here so ohter men can do the same. So one day soon we can do it all together as a group action, and that day their pussy power will crumble overnight. We will tell them that tere is a new group of men, they are not either gay and they don’t want their pussy.

And other men can do the same as well. Without telling a female; I don’t want your pussy, takling or writing at her is totally pointless, because they assume that you want her pussy, so it doesn’t matter what she does or says, you still want it, and you do whatever because you want it. This assumption comes from The Social Matrix that has programmed this asumption into females mind. They do not know that you don’t want it as long as she is the Persona, that’s why you have to tell them that.

After that one day we wake up and we won’t have to wonder which one is the one in twenty or one in thousand, they all will be real women. Tey all will wake up as princesses form a fable, and this is exactly what they are waiting for. It’s that simple.

@Studioline- I pretty much agree with your saying. I’m a single guy and have done a fair amount of dating in my recent years. What I think your basically saying is what Ive observed as well–the moment you start becoming too interested in a woman she will be turned off; I see this as counter-intuitive, but its a fact. I think a good book I could recommend in the arena of relating to women that I think is along your lines is one by David Deida called “the Superior Man”, where he gives a lot of, I feel, realistic advice on how to deal with women, your sexuality, and life on the whole.

I’ve gone out with about 20 girls in the past 2 yrs. Interestingly, I’ve only met one that I think would make a good girlfriend/wife/mother. What’s really fascinating about her is that she had a horrific childhood-was molested by he father on multiple occasions since the age of three-but is probably the most gracious woman I have ever met. I think some of it is due to great psychotherapy, but I think also it maybe this, sadly: I think if a woman, by unfortunate circumstance, sees the dark, evil side of men, she realizes how great she has it with a kind, gentle guy. Without this experience, a lot of women become entitlement princesses and take a guy for whats he’s worth.

no manhole said:

I’m thinking the words from the band ZZ Top may well explain the situation: “Everyday its man against man, on the planet full of women. Oh yea, driving me insane…”

@ No manhole, and guys
You are exactly right. Guys let’s not repeat the same mistake over and over of being against each other.
In response to previous post you don’t have to lose your sex drive. I also know that you ment The Social Matrix is limiting your potential, but I was lol when you said Evolution thanks fucking a lot… that was funny.
Guys
The solution is much simpler than this. Can you do the following? Go to a pub or any public gathering. Start talking to a woman/women in a normal way. No advances, no pickup, don’t be all over them just enjoy yourself and talk about things that are interesting to you on sexually indiferent thread of a conversation. Don’t just do forever all the talking, be also interested about them. Just like you have meet an old friend. But as soon as they start giving you the pussy power just say; I don’t want your pussy, and start leaving, don’t be nasty, say that with warmth and understanding. I want you to see for yourself what will happen, so when you come back write about it here, so other men can do the same.
I say it’s much simpler because men automaticly assume that when they say NO to pussy power they won’t get the pussy and they will be left with jo option. Nothing further form the truth. The paradox is you will get more pussy you could handle.
Now imagine what would happen if every man did that for a month like everyday. Game over. No more pussy power. Can “saving the world� or just doing anything, be more simple than this, or is it still too difficult?
Ps now imagine that women are reading this, they know all of this, so how could you demand respect form women if you couldn’t just do that?

The only tactical mistake is passivity in the face of your phenotypic destruction.

The women you “turned” here isn’t the result of some messianic quest put before you.. it’s simply common sense sinking through rockbrains at a trickle and would have happened one way or the other.

Too bad the percentage of them with such ability is too low to be hopeful.

I’m thinking the words from the band ZZ Top may well explain the situation: “Everyday its man against man, on the planet full of women. Oh yea, driving me insane…”

Ok have to go now, good night to all

You wanna make the same mistake women did which is “captivity” It doesn’t work like this. It’s much much simpler than this.
Besides violence is a tactical mistake, cos men and women who could be your believers would become your enemies, and you diminishing the number of the group.

Any plan against the Matriarchy without violence or atleast massive economic destruction is a failure before it begins.

@Muzalon- you said: “In other words, you seem to be saying that if men rejected pussy as the sole mode of modern aspiration, female power would crumble overnight.” I think this was Studioline’s idea first, although I support it. I just want to give credit where credit is due.

@ Muzalon

It’s a good question. The question of this type is already answered by the history. Pussy power is the tyrany of the present time. Every tyrany falls when it has nothing to offer any loner. So let’s take a look. Women as Personas – which stands for Godess on a pedestal, have nothing to offer to men. Every man know it by now, every man is alredy a member. They really have nothing to lose.

Does that gives anything to women? For every 100 normal women there is 1 normal man. By normal woman I mean a women who has to be a Persona by day, but when she is by herself, she thiks – Where is the man who will reascue me?

Few days ago there was a female on this site and we all talk with her. When she showed up she was a bitch. Well really it was something else. She was acting like a bitch because the only thing she saw so far was The Persona. Now she is a differnet person. What we did? What Jesus told us, We have saved her soul, We already have our place in heven. It just took few words and she woke up like the princess in the fable.

If they lose the pussy power, what do they lose? A better car? A biger TV? 10 pairs of shoes less in their collection? What do they gain? They gain their soul back!

How to do it techincaly is anoter issue, but you are right, men have to be be inforemd and come as a group. Not just one guy.

Evolution did not limit the great men of the past. It is rather that their evolutionary imperatives were tempered by other factors which we seem to have lost.

Muzalon said:

no manhole said:

@Studioline-every movement needs leaders, and you seem to be a good one. I really don’t know how exactly you might start a movement but maybe I might make you a few suggestions 1.) I may suggest that you enter the Forums (if you not have done so) and maybe start a thread there for how some kind of public awareness about the problems between men and women can be created. 2.) Although I don’t know much about organizations, I suspect you may be more effective if you started your own movement based on your own specific plan and get converts, much like Dick has done. My observation of you, based on what little I know about you, is that you have your own specific style of addressing the problems with women, and so I suggest you start your own movement, based on your plan.

It seems to me that every movement has several different leaders with different plans (eg compare Malcholm X to Martin Luther King in the American civil rights movement, or equity vs. radical feminsits). So I think it would not be unexpected if you found that while you were leading a movement others leaders may appear, with different approaches.

As for me, I am more of a thinker, not a leader, at least right now. But who knows. Also, I was a teacher, but not in History. I don’t know a damned thing about history! Best Wishes.

There is an English writer called Colin Wilson, and he says some interesting things. He says that in earlier ages, social status was determined by food, power, military might, authority, and so on. But in our age, status is determined by something else entirely: namely, sex (or having sex with young women). In other words, pussy power is the final social identifier in our Matrix: it is a measure of our affluent society, to pursue something so ephemeral. Guys in the Middle Ages were not interested in pussy, they were after glory, fame and the blessing of God (this is why they had no fear of death, were great warriors, etc.).

Women acquiring goddess status is thus related to sheer affluence, in that pussy (which they possess) is the sole aspirational ideal in our modern culture. Little wonder they are omnipotent, and we are living in a matriarchal matrix! And of course, men in the Middle Ages (or earlier ages than that) had different modes of aspiration, involving valour, religion, chivalry and so on which meant WOMEN HAD NO POWER.

Yea, I think your right. Thats why I hate my sex drive. I would much rather spend my time doing something great for society (building a bridge crossing the Bering Strait or finding the cure for cancer) rather than chasing after women. Evolution-thanks a fuckin’ lot for limiting my potential, damn it.

no manhole said:

@Studioline-every movement needs leaders, and you seem to be a good one. I really don’t know how exactly you might start a movement but maybe I might make you a few suggestions 1.) I may suggest that you enter the Forums (if you not have done so) and maybe start a thread there for how some kind of public awareness about the problems between men and women can be created. 2.) Although I don’t know much about organizations, I suspect you may be more effective if you started your own movement based on your own specific plan and get converts, much like Dick has done. My observation of you, based on what little I know about you, is that you have your own specific style of addressing the problems with women, and so I suggest you start your own movement, based on your plan.

It seems to me that every movement has several different leaders with different plans (eg compare Malcholm X to Martin Luther King in the American civil rights movement, or equity vs. radical feminsits). So I think it would not be unexpected if you found that while you were leading a movement others leaders may appear, with different approaches.

As for me, I am more of a thinker, not a leader, at least right now. But who knows. Also, I was a teacher, but not in History. I don’t know a damned thing about history! Best Wishes.

There is an English writer called Colin Wilson, and he says some interesting things. He says that in earlier ages, social status was determined by food, power, military prowess, riches, and so on. But in our age, status is determined by something else entirely: namely, sex (or having sex with young women). In other words, pussy power is the final social identifier in our modern Matrix: it is a measure of our affluent society, to pursue something so ephemeral. In contrast, guys in the Middle Ages were not interested in pussy, they were after glory, fame and the blessing of God (this is why they had no fear of death, were great warriors, etc.).

Women acquiring goddess status is thus related to sheer affluence, in that pussy (which they possess) is the sole aspirational ideal in our modern culture. Little wonder they are omnipotent, and we are living in a matriarchal matrix! And of course, men in the Middle Ages (or earlier ages than that) had different modes of aspiration, involving valour, faith, chivalry and so on, which meant WOMEN HAD NO POWER because pussy meant nothing to the iron men of those days.

In other words, you seem to be saying that if men rejected pussy as the sole mode of modern aspiration, female power would crumble overnight. But the question is – can modern Anglo-American men do that? Have they the Will?

Keb said:

@nmh- I thought you were a history teacher to. What did you teach?

Im an engineering/science type. Thats all Im saying, but I appreciate your interest.

no manhole said:

@Studioline-every movement needs leaders, and you seem to be a good one. I really don’t know how exactly you might start a movement but maybe I might make you a few suggestions 1.) I may suggest that you enter the Forums (if you not have done so) and maybe start a thread there for how some kind of public awareness about the problems between men and women can be created. 2.) Although I don’t know much about organizations, I suspect you may be more effective if you started your own movement based on your own specific plan and get converts, much like Dick has done. My observation of you, based on what little I know about you, is that you have your own specific style of addressing the problems with women, and so I suggest you start your own movement, based on your plan.

It seems to me that every movement has several different leaders with different plans (eg compare Malcholm X to Martin Luther King in the American civil rights movement, or equity vs. radical feminsits). So I think it would not be unexpected if you found that while you were leading a movement others leaders may appear, with different approaches.

As for me, I am more of a thinker, not a leader, at least right now. But who knows. Also, I was a teacher, but not in History. I don’t know a damned thing about history! Best Wishes.

There is an English writer called Colin Wilson, and he says some interesting things. He says that in earlier ages, social status was determined by food, power, military might, authority, and so on. But in our age, status is determined by something else entirely: namely, sex (or having sex with young women). In other words, pussy power is the final social identifier in our Matrix: it is a measure of our affluent society, to pursue something so ephemeral. Guys in the Middle Ages were not interested in pussy, they were after glory, fame and the blessing of God (this is why they had no fear of death, were great warriors, etc.).

Women acquiring goddess status is thus related to sheer affluence, in that pussy (which they possess) is the sole aspirational ideal in our modern culture. Little wonder they are omnipotent, and we are living in a matriarchal matrix! And of course, men in the Middle Ages (or earlier ages than that) had different modes of aspiration, involving valour, religion, chivalry and so on which meant WOMEN HAD NO POWER.

@nmh- I thought you were a history teacher to. What did you teach?

@Studioline-every movement needs leaders, and you seem to be a good one. I really don’t know how exactly you might start a movement but maybe I might make you a few suggestions 1.) I may suggest that you enter the Forums (if you not have done so) and maybe start a thread there for how some kind of public awareness about the problems between men and women can be created. 2.) Although I don’t know much about organizations, I suspect you may be more effective if you started your own movement based on your own specific plan and get converts, much like Dick has done. My observation of you, based on what little I know about you, is that you have your own specific style of addressing the problems with women, and so I suggest you start your own movement, based on your plan.

It seems to me that every movement has several different leaders with different plans (eg compare Malcholm X to Martin Luther King in the American civil rights movement, or equity vs. radical feminsits). So I think it would not be unexpected if you found that while you were leading a movement others leaders may appear, with different approaches.

As for me, I am more of a thinker, not a leader, at least right now. But who knows. Also, I was a teacher, but not in History. I don’t know a damned thing about history! Best Wishes.

@ No manhole

Im happy you said that, I knew that and I appreaciate you honesty and I always felt your spirit, even we never met and probably never will. Im also impresed with your inteligence, like for ex you know the reason Im here. As you know I live far from America, and I could easly give a shit about your country and people there. But as a human being I do care, and this even suprises me why cos I m a busy man, and every day I intend to leave this site and for some reason I find myself writing another post.

Your idea of this site is correct. This exactly was the intent of the founder Dick M. I was just hopeing that just like every movement based on truth it evolves in a natural way. It first starts as nothing at all, and then it changes everything. But in order to make a change something actually phisicly has to be done.

On one side you have a misery of your country and suffering of its people. There is no official war, no one shoots, but there is a war between sexes. It was kind of quiet so far, like sometimes a teenager shot his classmates, or some serial murderer wanted to pass a message, some chick cut off a mans penis, or some 9/11, just few examples. But this is not the worst what happens. The worst happen in the minds of your people who are exposed everyday to The Social Matrix. And even that everyone feels it noone does anything.

You were a history teacher, ok so lets look at one ex to draw a conclusion. The Roman Empire would never colapse if it was not The Social Matrix of that time which fucked those poeple minds so they colapsed form the inside. Your country is like that empire. And this happens again, right now. Only difference is there is no Colloseum and fear of tyrany, but there is a sexes war based on idea of pussy power. How long people will be able to live like this, without love, faith, just hating each other? It will only fuck up their minds and I don’t exactly know what disasters awaits you, but they will happen if you don’t do anything.

The history of your coutry is a history of great men. Even some of them arrived form my country. That’s why Im suprised that the brainwash went so far, that you are not able to do anything, Which brings us the the other side – the solution. The paradox is that saving your country is so easy, like never before in world’s history yet the brainwash moves forward everyday, so disables you to make this most simple thing happen.

I have even demonstrated it on this site. Boy was I suprised no one even noticed what I did. I picked up random women and once even one character by the name of “Martin” who claimed to be a man. I just did one trick a technique. And it was; I don’t want your pussy. plus possible variations of it, depends on the context. And it worked every time. Why? Simple. If the present Social Matrix is based on pussy power you basicly do the opposite you say ” I dont want your pussy”

Do this and variations of this theme and everyone is a winner.

This site is a variation of this theme, it indirectly says that to women, but still it too complicated for their minds, the frequency so to speak is not exactly the one they pick the signal on. It’s a good start however to tell them that they are inferior, they are stupid, bitch and so on. But it only makes them mad.

For ex If I was working for your goverment I wolud start a sight http://www.Idontwnatyourpussy.com . In that context they – women would get and understand the message. And a year form now the problem wolud be solved. Ofcourse not form a site alone but form the message, and then form carrying that message to the Matrix.

And the best part is; no bravery requred, no war, no shooting, only carry the truth and the last thing would be to teach women how to be competent about men, which would bring them more than the ability to use men and treat like garbage. Because the truth is that this is exactly what they want, and thats why they went after the pseudo-feminism, only not knowing that they do not have the formula.

This is basicly all your new matrix.

Muzalon said:

studioline said:
So my question is this; will you rather watch your country colapse instead of doing something as easy as snaping your fingers, or will you fucking finally do it?

One thing I have to admit about all these issues is: is Anglo-American feminism/pussy power/misandry actually nothing to do with women at all, but mainly to do with men becoming weak and unworthy of respect? The natural hierarchy of western society used to be such that the ‘rulers’ (men, the higher social classes) used to naturally command respect by how they behaved. Victorian men used to be bolder and more masterful, and because of this, no woman would think to challenge them. Pre-modern elite guys like Henry V were desperate to fight and win glory in wars, even at risk of death. Modern men or elites are just cringing pussies by comparison, and women/sheeple may simply have expanded into our weakness.

In the US, I think the media teaches men to be “pussies”–in other words, women are to be considered superior beings. Also I think a problem could be sometimes that our fathers may not be very good about teaching us how to be men, beyond what is brain-washed into us by the female-friendly media.

studioline said:
So my question is this; will you rather watch your country colapse instead of doing something as easy as snaping your fingers, or will you fucking finally do it?

One thing I have to admit about all these issues is: is Anglo-American feminism/pussy power/misandry actually nothing to do with women at all, but mainly to do with men becoming weak and unworthy of respect? The natural hierarchy of western society used to be such that the ‘rulers’ (men, the higher social classes) used to naturally command respect by how they behaved. Victorian men used to be bolder and more masterful, and because of this, no woman would think to challenge them. Pre-modern elite guys like Henry V were desperate to fight and win glory in wars, even at risk of death. Modern men or elites are just cringing pussies by comparison, and women/sheeple may simply have expanded into our weakness.

@Studioline- I think people that post here may have different goals; in other words, why are they at this site posting? Well,for me, its a way for me to feel empowered–to better understand myself and reality, and how I interact with reality. I think for others, perhaps you, its to draw great plans for many others in the hope of making a better world. Right now, I’m not really interested in being part of some massive plan, but maybe later. I think its great that you do have ideas for plans, and this challenges my thinking as well.

no manhole said:

I think feminists would love to see porn outlawed. The situation they would prefer is for the male sexual libido to feminized, in other word, we feel attraction as a women does: its not visual, but mostly emotional.

Not to mention financial. It is amusing how women complain about porn objectifying women, but think nothing of objectifying men financially without question. Bullshit, thy name is woman…

@ No manhole

I feel you Gezzzz

The solution already exist, there is no point of searching for it any longer as there is no point of forceing the open door. The door is alrady open. You and other guys [really no offence because I fucking love you all just as much as Dick M does love you] are staring at the door and thinking theories how to open it, while the bomb is ticking where you at.

I feel there is nothing wrong with making theories; its a way of attempting to understand reality. For example, poster A makes a theory, poster B challenges it, then A rethinks his theory, and modifies it if he wants to, to make theory most based on reality. Why bother you ask? I think for a couple of reasons 1.) As you have stated, the social milieu is complicated–there is what is being said, and then there is the truth, which may not always match what is being said, so exchange of ideas helps reveal the truth. 2.) with a better understanding of the truth, after exchange of ideas, you can make more effective solutions. Just my opinion.

Faminism and porn ok let’s take a pick

Women want to control the pussy market. If men watch porn and jo there is less dick for them, to control. If men dont watch porn and don’t jo they have to go to women and pay one way or another. But woman won’t say this when they speak because they know this and obviously can’t admit it, so they write on official version how porn objectifies women bs etc.

This strategy of women is plainly stupid. Let’s make an equation: There are lots of gey men which women have created over last decades. Plus there are lots of men who jo watching porn or use paid sex. There are men in the army, there are men in jail. Lets not forget also about men who are scared as shit to even apporach a woman… There is Dick M who says; I dont give a fuck what they do to me I no longer supply the movement of pussy power. There is No manhole who finds sexual drive disturbing as he stated somewhere in previous post. There are copule of gusy who don’t want to fuck women any longer but they want women to be fucked by dogs as they stated in their posts. And on and on…..

And there are other men on this site, who express that they no longer want to have anything to do with women. They is you and me. All men in the world vomit on the idea of pussy power at this point.

So to end our rough equation; there is like 1 dick for every 100 women out there. And suprisingly women still believe that movement of pussy power is the best thing since Jesus. Do they really.

You guys are asking; why women call Dick’s line and they leave mad messages with no point? Listen closer so you will hear. Women will never say it directly, but they cry for help, they cry: Men please, please, take the pussy power away form us. Listen again or next time and you will hear.

But you men are not willing to do that. You will bitch, create complicated theories, where the feminism come from, who is the smartes guy here, and all other useless bullshit. Insted of just taking that pussy power away form women and show them how to be better without it.

And why we all want that to happen? Because the world and especially your country can’t go on like this any longer. You have been brain washed for dacades, the power is yours to take, right under your feet, but you can’t see it, even that makeing this change is the most easy thing in the world as just picking it up.

So my question is this; will you rather watch your country colapse instead of doing something as easy as snaping your fingers, or will you fucking finally do it?

Jim said:

no manhole said:

Jim said:

no manhole said:

You can stat with the evidence that Einstein was a plagarist and that none of the equations in his 1905 paper were novel. I will do my own research as well.

He stole the whole lot off Marie Curie in 1904.

Einstein came out with four papers in 1905. One of them, about electrodynamics, did borrow a significant amount of information from Lorentz (the Lorentz contraction formula) and Poincare, however, he generalized the information with new insights and equations and codified it to a theory of Special Relativity. The other three papers (about Brownian Motion, the photoelectric effect, and mass -energy exchange (E = mc2) are completely novel. Also he came out with the theory of general relativity years later, so I really don’t think that Einstein was a plagarist, and its ridiculous to think that he was.

Curie did her research, as far as I know, on radioactivity, which has nothing to do with the mathematical codification that Einstein applied to relativistic physics, and other branches of the field. I think what she did was purify and identify radioactive elements–very little math involved.

If I need to be corrected, please do so.

Why is Brownian motion not called Einsteinian motion, if his ideas were completely novel? He did not come up with all his ideas totally out of the blue because his mind was infinitely better than anyone elses. I remember reading articles about him where people wondered if we would ever have relativity if he didn’t live. It was actually a race to be first to publish, and without Einstein it would have appeared in a few months or years at most. Gauss even tried to measure the curvature of space in his time, so its not as if only the genius of Einstein was capable of these leaps forward, and everyone else was just too dumb to ever figure it out.

I was joking about Marie Curie.

It is not ridiculous to suspect him of plagiarism. He did not cite prior work. That is not being honest. I guess my point is that he needs to be cut down to size. If he is still a genius after that, then so be it. I think his intellect is way exagerrated, that’s all.

And there was a british/jewish conspiracy to elevate him to god-like status as part of the propaganda drive after WWI, where they wanted a German hero to try and make amends for the war somehow. He was not famous after his 1905 relativity paper, and it was only after the fudged mercury precession that he became really famous. Quantum mech. has a whole host of heroes, why is only one name associated with the discovery of relativity, and yet so many names are associated with the details of it.

As I understand it, from one book I read “Einsteins Luck” (I forget the author), what made Einstein famous was that one of the predictions of his paper on general relativity, that light is bent by gravity, was dramatically “confirmed” by an astronomical expedition to check the positions of stars near the sun during the solar eclipse of 1919. This confirmation put Einstein into the stratosphere and further advanced the career of Arthur Eddington, the man that organized the eclipse expedition, as the man that proved Einstein was right.

Interestingly, the book describes, in one of its chapters, that this data was largely flawed and in no way could be used to support Einsteins hypothesis that gravity bends light; in fact, the technique needs more sophisticated equipment than what was available until modern times.

However, as I recall Einsteins predictions in his general relativity paper, including the one that light is bent by gravity, has been largely proven.

Anyway, one argument your using is that if Einstein didn’t discover the things that he did, someone else would have, and this is certainly true. But that can be said to ANY major scientific discovery, including plenty of great ones made by non-jewish scientists (eg Watson/Crick deducement of the structure of DNA, Heisenberg’s Matrix Mechanics description of electron disposition around atoms, etc). A good example of overlap between great thinkers occurs in the field of quantum mechanics, where Heisenberg and Schrodinger describe a lot of the same things but through different methods (Schrodinger, algebric wave equations, Heisenberg, matricies).

The view in science is that historical primacy of a discovery is everything; in other words, if scientist A discovers something years before than the exact same discovery of Scientist B, then Scientist A gets most of the credit. And so if you use your argument that Einstein means little b/c someone else would have discovered it, you would have to use it with great non-jewish scientists as well, and so nobody (including Heisenberg) would get credit for any major discoveries.

Jim said:

Feminists pretend to hate porn, but in feminist societies what really happens?
Lots of porn is used to keep men under control. They spend all day looking at it, and don’t bother women anymore. Feminists like that. Who makes all the porn? Mostly women porn queens. It is mostly for a male audience too.
In countries with lots of porn, rape and molestation rates drop, and feminists know this. In feminist countries prostitution is legalised for the same reason- to raise the costs of sex.
Now, you might think it makes it cheaper, but that is not the case. It becomes actually harder for a man to enjoy sex, and women will withhold it to get something in return. Many guys have to settle for less and less sex, and in order to get it, they have to pay big time. This is a continuation of the same alpha/beta male theme. To be an alpha has always been hard work, and women conspire to ensure it is as hard as possible. The costs of having an affair to compensate have risen through the roof – you can lose everything you have one and then pay more and more in the years afterwards.
Women are becoming more high maintenance than ever, if they even want a man at all.

I agree with you in the affect that the affect of porn is to pacify males, and interestingly a radical feminist opines this as well:

http://nymag.com/nymetro/news/trends/n_9437/

You seem to think there is a conspiracy of feminists to control the male libido, which is reminiscent to me of Naomi Wolf and other radical feminists, who seem to think there is a conspiracy of rich white men trying to control the power of women. I really don’t think this is the case. Feminists, I think, hate porn, because they feel it objectifies the womens body, and, as Thomas Ellis opined, makes it all to clear that there is NO connection between male sexuality and falling in love, a though that horrifies most western women. I think feminists would love to see porn outlawed. The situation they would prefer is for the male sexual libido to feminized, in other word, we feel attraction as a women does: its not visual, but mostly emotional. In this circumstance (which would never occur), the feminist would achieve two goals: the feminization of male libido and the lack of male interest in porn. Feminists are amazing to me that they don’t understand that you cannot change the male libido.

Feminists pretend to hate porn, but in feminist societies what really happens?
Lots of porn is used to keep men under control. They spend all day looking at it, and don’t bother women anymore. Feminists like that. Who makes all the porn? Mostly women porn queens. It is mostly for a male audience too.
In countries with lots of porn, rape and molestation rates drop, and feminists know this. In feminist countries prostitution is legalised for the same reason- to raise the costs of sex.
Now, you might think it makes it cheaper, but that is not the case. It becomes actually harder for a man to enjoy sex, and women will withhold it to get something in return. Many guys have to settle for less and less sex, and in order to get it, they have to pay big time. This is a continuation of the same alpha/beta male theme. To be an alpha has always been hard work, and women conspire to ensure it is as hard as possible. The costs of having an affair to compensate have risen through the roof – you can lose everything you have one and then pay more and more in the years afterwards.
Women are becoming more high maintenance than ever, if they even want a man at all.

no manhole said:

Jim said:

no manhole said:

You can stat with the evidence that Einstein was a plagarist and that none of the equations in his 1905 paper were novel. I will do my own research as well.

He stole the whole lot off Marie Curie in 1904.

Einstein came out with four papers in 1905. One of them, about electrodynamics, did borrow a significant amount of information from Lorentz (the Lorentz contraction formula) and Poincare, however, he generalized the information with new insights and equations and codified it to a theory of Special Relativity. The other three papers (about Brownian Motion, the photoelectric effect, and mass -energy exchange (E = mc2) are completely novel. Also he came out with the theory of general relativity years later, so I really don’t think that Einstein was a plagarist, and its ridiculous to think that he was.

Curie did her research, as far as I know, on radioactivity, which has nothing to do with the mathematical codification that Einstein applied to relativistic physics, and other branches of the field. I think what she did was purify and identify radioactive elements–very little math involved.

If I need to be corrected, please do so.

Why is Brownian motion not called Einsteinian motion, if his ideas were completely novel? He did not come up with all his ideas totally out of the blue because his mind was infinitely better than anyone elses. I remember reading articles about him where people wondered if we would ever have relativity if he didn’t live. It was actually a race to be first to publish, and without Einstein it would have appeared in a few months or years at most. Gauss even tried to measure the curvature of space in his time, so its not as if only the genius of Einstein was capable of these leaps forward, and everyone else was just too dumb to ever figure it out.

I was joking about Marie Curie.

It is not ridiculous to suspect him of plagiarism. He did not cite prior work. That is not being honest. I guess my point is that he needs to be cut down to size. If he is still a genius after that, then so be it. I think his intellect is way exagerrated, that’s all.

And there was a british/jewish conspiracy to elevate him to god-like status as part of the propaganda drive after WWI, where they wanted a German hero to try and make amends for the war somehow. He was not famous after his 1905 relativity paper, and it was only after the fudged mercury precession that he became really famous. Quantum mech. has a whole host of heroes, why is only one name associated with the discovery of relativity, and yet so many names are associated with the details of it.

son of the suns said:

To lose the sex drive is to lose the drive to conquer and build skyscrapers and spacecraft and everything.

I just think a large number of global elite matriarchy must be killed.. publicly and nastily. The cowards they are, this will probably send women running into our arms.

If not, we follow it to its completion.

Well, I said redirect the sex drive, not eliminate it. For example, the “eureka” pill could be a psychopharmacological agent that could be taken before sex with a sex-bot so that the sex-bot “feels” enough like a real women to achieve orgasm. That be enough for me, and I’ll still build my skyscraper the next day. Fuck yea.

To elaborate just picture what happened to the cunt pretender to the Executive in Pakistan… publicly shot in the neck with all her beta male entourage in attendance.

Just apply that treatment to every western political wannabe, the architects and current leaders of feminism, “sex symbol” entertainment industry harlots, etc.

Watch the world change in a matter of days.

To lose the sex drive is to lose the drive to conquer and build skyscrapers and spacecraft and everything.

I just think a large number of global elite matriarchy must be killed.. publicly and nastily. The cowards they are, this will probably send women running into our arms.

If not, we follow it to its completion.

son of the suns said:

The old dumbfuck meme of “blacks are Jewish tools of destruction wah wah wah”.

If white women wanted black men for their mythically large packages I’d be at the top of the list since im a “med man” of southern European genetic ancestry which are close to Africans in that department than Anglos.

But with females it’s not about big cocks and orgasms.. it’s about what’s a new host to exploit and destroy and move on. Swamp leeches.

If anything, it will be a Jew genius who finds some way to reproduce men when the “female problem” is addressed.

Oh, that will be Muzalon then. We will have to think of an appropriate appelation for him when he frees us from the bonds of servitude toward females by redirecting our sex drive in some fashion through a pharmacological agent (a pill).

I guess Der Fuhrer wouldn’t work. Mahatama? Djerassi?

The old dumbfuck meme of “blacks are Jewish tools of destruction wah wah wah”.

If white women wanted black men for their mythically large packages I’d be at the top of the list since im a “med man” of southern European genetic ancestry which are close to Africans in that department than Anglos.

But with females it’s not about big cocks and orgasms.. it’s about what’s a new host to exploit and destroy and move on. Swamp leeches.

If anything, it will be a Jew genius who finds some way to reproduce men when the “female problem” is addressed.

Muzalon said:

Mik3_D said:

Women on their own could not have pushed feminism as far as it has gone today. Only men in positions of power could have made it happen. According to one of the Rockefellers, “We … created the women’s movement, and we promote it. And it’s not about equal opportunity. It’s designed to get both parents out of the home and into the workforce, where they will pay taxes. And then we can decide how the children will be raised and educated.”

Strong, independent, father lead families are the biggest threat to their power and control over the people. Using feminism and divorce courts they are able to break them up and strip men of most or all of their power and influence in their own families.

But is not that just economic expedience, the nature of capitalism? Of course, women at work = more consumers = more profits. It is just the way of things – capitalism carried to its obvious conclusion.

At a deeper, conceptual level, Judaism lacks the characteristic puritan ‘anti life’ agendas of Christianity, which derive from Paul and (probably) certain strains of eastern asceticism. Christianity as practised and experienced in the West clearly has an anti-sex/pleasure/life agenda, especially in its debased Protestant form. This is why the Western, Christianised nations have a long-standing tendency to set women atop pedestals, above criticism or reproach. This did not start in 1920 or 1960: it goes back centuries, to the Medieval cult of Courtly Love, where women were accorded semi-divine status in poetry and song (the wandering Troubadours spread this cult across Europe). In my view, many of the gynaocratic tendencies we see today have their primal origins in Western culture, and Anglo culture in particular.

The Word of God gives many warnings about the ways of women. Churches don’t preach that but a real child of God doesn’t need a church built with mens hands anyway.

There were some worthy women of God in the Word but todays modern women have more in common with Jezebel than anyone else. The whore that washed Jesus’ feet with perfume is far better than most of them.

Jim said:

no manhole said:

You can stat with the evidence that Einstein was a plagarist and that none of the equations in his 1905 paper were novel. I will do my own research as well.

He stole the whole lot off Marie Curie in 1904.

Einstein came out with four papers in 1905. One of them, about electrodynamics, did borrow a significant amount of information from Lorentz (the Lorentz contraction formula) and Poincare, however, he generalized the information with new insights and equations and codified it to a theory of Special Relativity. The other three papers (about Brownian Motion, the photoelectric effect, and mass -energy exchange (E = mc2) are completely novel. Also he came out with the theory of general relativity years later, so I really don’t think that Einstein was a plagarist, and its ridiculous to think that he was.

Curie did her research, as far as I know, on radioactivity, which has nothing to do with the mathematical codification that Einstein applied to relativistic physics, and other branches of the field. I think what she did was purify and identify radioactive elements–very little math involved.

If I need to be corrected, please do so.

no manhole said:

You can stat with the evidence that Einstein was a plagarist and that none of the equations in his 1905 paper were novel. I will do my own research as well.

He stole the whole lot off Marie Curie in 1904.

Muzalon said:

Jim said:

Puritanism can lead to feminism. Feminism promotes pornography, promiscuity, destruction of the family. That is not exactly puritanism, but like everything in communism, things can seem the opposite of what they really are. Denmark is afflicted by a peculiar version of puritanism, but as always, it too leads to feminism.
Feminism is a communist plot.

Feminism hardly promotes porn – nearly all feminists want porn banned. Feminism also loathes promiscuity, viewing it as exploitation of women. Of course, their real agenda is to limit the supply of sex, so that men can be coerced by pussy power. My point is, that Anglo-Saxon feminism and Anglo-Saxon puritanism are one; they have always been one, and always will be one. Communism is dead, a non-event: Anglo feminism is a cultural, not a political movement which pretends to be revolutionary, but which in fact is just a continuation of the core meta-themes in Anglo-Saxon culture (repression, schizoid hatred of the body, poor gender relations, hatred of sensual pleasure, etc.). These ideas are so revolutionary some will find them hard to grasp, at first.

I really dont think the goal of radical feminism is to control the supply of sex–I see this as a side benefit for them, however. I feel their goal is to feminize men and society. Radical feminsits feel they are emotionally superior to men, and therfore they try to feminize men, as they feel we are barbarous (feminize the manner of our sexual attraction) and society (laws that favor women in the courts, government support of women). Muzalon, although I appreciate your scientific underpinnings, I dont think there is a concious evolutionary-based objective to the feminists to control sexual power, its just a by product, just my opinion. I think their objectives are completely against evolutionary-honed instict, and this clash causes the frustration and misery of today in western culture.

Jim said:

Puritanism can lead to feminism. Feminism promotes pornography, promiscuity, destruction of the family. That is not exactly puritanism, but like everything in communism, things can seem the opposite of what they really are. Denmark is afflicted by a peculiar version of puritanism, but as always, it too leads to feminism.
Feminism is a communist plot.

Feminism hardly promotes porn – nearly all feminists want porn banned. Feminism also loathes promiscuity, viewing it as exploitation of women. Of course, their real agenda is to limit the supply of sex, so that men can be coerced by pussy power. My point is, that Anglo-Saxon feminism and Anglo-Saxon puritanism are one; they have always been one, and always will be one. Communism is dead, a non-event: Anglo feminism is a cultural, not a political movement which pretends to be revolutionary, but which in fact is just a continuation of the core meta-themes in Anglo-Saxon culture (repression, schizoid hatred of the body, poor gender relations, hatred of sensual pleasure, etc.). These ideas are so revolutionary some will find them hard to grasp, at first.

Mik3_D said:

Women on their own could not have pushed feminism as far as it has gone today. Only men in positions of power could have made it happen. According to one of the Rockefellers, “We … created the women’s movement, and we promote it. And it’s not about equal opportunity. It’s designed to get both parents out of the home and into the workforce, where they will pay taxes. And then we can decide how the children will be raised and educated.”

Strong, independent, father lead families are the biggest threat to their power and control over the people. Using feminism and divorce courts they are able to break them up and strip men of most or all of their power and influence in their own families.

But is not that just economic expedience, the nature of capitalism? Of course, women at work = more consumers = more profits. It is just the way of things – capitalism carried to its obvious conclusion.

At a deeper, conceptual level, Judaism lacks the characteristic puritan ‘anti life’ agendas of Christianity, which derive from Paul and (probably) certain strains of eastern asceticism. Christianity as practised and experienced in the West clearly has an anti-sex/pleasure/life agenda, especially in its debased Protestant form. This is why the Western, Christianised nations have a long-standing tendency to set women atop pedestals, above criticism or reproach. This did not start in 1920 or 1960: it goes back centuries, to the Medieval cult of Courtly Love, where women were accorded semi-divine status in poetry and song (the wandering Troubadours spread this cult across Europe). In my view, many of the gynaocratic tendencies we see today have their primal origins in Western culture, and Anglo culture in particular.

Jim said:

no manhole said:

Muzalon said:

Jim said:

Iwillchewyouupandspityouout said:

Is that wrong? There is such thing as diversity and it’s a little bit more diverse than just men.

So you don’t appreciate me being racist, I don’t appreciate you being sexist.
fuck you, yer wrong

I agree, there is some merit to racism. It is loyalty to your own people, and what is wrong with that?
The people most loyal to their own race, and yet most vocal against racism are the jews.
The jews created feminism to divide the sexes, the same as they created multiculturalism to destroy the white race.
And before anyone takes offence at this, read about the origins of multiculturalism for yourself, and read about the origins of feminism too.
They are one and the same – communist jews.
The NAACP was started and run by jews. In the 1890s (yes, that long ago)a jew even tried to enact a law forbidding a white woman to resist the sexual advances of a black man. Of course this law was blocked, but they will stop at nothing to destroy us and take the world.
Women are corrupted, but jews are worse. In their behaviour they are like a race of women. The parallels run deep.
Spielberg’s movie Amistad is anti-white propaganda, and hides the fact that most of the slave traders were jewish. They have always used the blacks to destroy white civilisations, and this goes back centuries.
They privately gloat amongst themselves about this. They hate us far more than we could ever hate them.
Not all jews are like this, of course, but like women most have bought the story that white men are out to get them.
The flood of blacks into western countries has only just begun. Before its finished, everybody will be racist.

This is the real reason men and women hate each other in western countries today.

What about the role of Anglo-Saxon puritanism in shaping feminism? Puritanism, by suppressing sex, automatically grants women ‘the Little Princess’ Syndrome. Also, this explains why feminism and misandry are most rampant in Anglo-Saxon countries.

I do not understand anti-semitism in our contemporary culture. Without a doubt Jews are disproportionately in positions of power and influence in America but I don’t think they are there because Jews seek power to control others (except over themselves and their fate, understandable) but they are there because they are very smart, and fall to places where their talents lie.

I’m doubtful of Jim’s arguments about Jews starting feminism. Women started feminism, with two wave movements (1920’s and 1970’s). If the women leading feminism happened to be Jewish, I don’t think they were promoting feminism to promote the fate of Jews. Maybe the Jews started the NAACP but clearly they are not a major influential part of that organization in our current culture.

Jews strike me as quite willing to intermarry and lose their identity.

The idea of Jews “controlling” our culture to set up the destruction of whites, particulalry in the United States, is a paranoid rant with little basis in fact.

If this Jim is the same one that posted earlier that Einstein was a fraud then his objectivity must be questioned.

The NAACP was a Jewish organisation for its first 50 years of existance. It was founded and led by jews. It never had a black president until relatively recently.
Rosa Parks was paid to sit on the bus, it was an assignment given to her- by the jewish communists in the NAACP. She was a paid employee of the NAACP.
Puritanism can lead to feminism. Feminism promotes pornography, promiscuity, destruction of the family. That is not exactly puritanism, but like everything in communism, things can seem the opposite of what they really are. Denmark is afflicted by a peculiar version of puritanism, but as always, it too leads to feminism.
Feminism is a communist plot.
Einstein was known as the “incorrigible plagiarist”. On the night he died, mossad agents armed with uzis burst into his office and took all his personal papers, to return them to Israel. Why did they do that? How did they get away with it? If the Chinese, or Australians, or any one else did that sort of thing there would be trouble. Einstein was not what he seemed, and was a jewish ethnic activist as well as a scientist. Every single equation in his 1905 relativity paper appeared before. Every single one!There is evidence also that his wife did much of his research/copying.
Why, if he worked it all out, is virtually nothing in relativity named after him? Minkowski spaces, Robertson-Walker metric, Lorentz-Fitzgerald transformations to name a few. Some of these pre-dated 1905. And nobody back then thought he deserved a nobel prize for his efforts. The media says hes the most brainy guy ever, and the media happens to be 99% jewish-run.

The the US media promotes feminism, race-mixing, communist ideas etc.

Try stop watching TV for a couple of years, and then look for the anti-white propaganda. Its everywhere. The US is not going to be a white country in 100 years – so much for the power of “white racism”. The white man has less power against minorites than he has against women. The public seems to think men still rule 100%, and some men do, but the average joe aint got a chance against all this.

http://www.henrymakow.com is a website run by a jewish guy who knows the truth too. Most jews don’t know what their leaders are up to either, or else it suits them to keep quiet- they like what’s happening. Tell your jewish friends that you don’t like multiculturalism and wish america was still a white country. See what reaction that gets. Discuss it with them. I bet they know far more about the true situation than they let on.

I can back all this up with facts, figures, data, etc until hell freezes over. Where do you want me to start?

You can stat with the evidence that Einstein was a plagarist and that none of the equations in his 1905 paper were novel. I will do my own research as well.

Mik3_D said:

Women on their own could not have pushed feminism as far as it has gone today. Only men in positions of power could have made it happen. According to one of the Rockefellers, “We … created the women’s movement, and we promote it. And it’s not about equal opportunity. It’s designed to get both parents out of the home and into the workforce, where they will pay taxes. And then we can decide how the children will be raised and educated.”

Strong, independent, father lead families are the biggest threat to their power and control over the people. Using feminism and divorce courts they are able to break them up and strip men of most or all of their power and influence in their own families.

Yes. What you have said is all 100% correct. The reasons go much deeper than tax gathering too. Some people might think your post is a “paranoid rant”, but I know it is true.

no manhole said:

Muzalon said:

Jim said:

Iwillchewyouupandspityouout said:

Is that wrong? There is such thing as diversity and it’s a little bit more diverse than just men.

So you don’t appreciate me being racist, I don’t appreciate you being sexist.
fuck you, yer wrong

I agree, there is some merit to racism. It is loyalty to your own people, and what is wrong with that?
The people most loyal to their own race, and yet most vocal against racism are the jews.
The jews created feminism to divide the sexes, the same as they created multiculturalism to destroy the white race.
And before anyone takes offence at this, read about the origins of multiculturalism for yourself, and read about the origins of feminism too.
They are one and the same – communist jews.
The NAACP was started and run by jews. In the 1890s (yes, that long ago)a jew even tried to enact a law forbidding a white woman to resist the sexual advances of a black man. Of course this law was blocked, but they will stop at nothing to destroy us and take the world.
Women are corrupted, but jews are worse. In their behaviour they are like a race of women. The parallels run deep.
Spielberg’s movie Amistad is anti-white propaganda, and hides the fact that most of the slave traders were jewish. They have always used the blacks to destroy white civilisations, and this goes back centuries.
They privately gloat amongst themselves about this. They hate us far more than we could ever hate them.
Not all jews are like this, of course, but like women most have bought the story that white men are out to get them.
The flood of blacks into western countries has only just begun. Before its finished, everybody will be racist.

This is the real reason men and women hate each other in western countries today.

What about the role of Anglo-Saxon puritanism in shaping feminism? Puritanism, by suppressing sex, automatically grants women ‘the Little Princess’ Syndrome. Also, this explains why feminism and misandry are most rampant in Anglo-Saxon countries.

I do not understand anti-semitism in our contemporary culture. Without a doubt Jews are disproportionately in positions of power and influence in America but I don’t think they are there because Jews seek power to control others (except over themselves and their fate, understandable) but they are there because they are very smart, and fall to places where their talents lie.

I’m doubtful of Jim’s arguments about Jews starting feminism. Women started feminism, with two wave movements (1920’s and 1970’s). If the women leading feminism happened to be Jewish, I don’t think they were promoting feminism to promote the fate of Jews. Maybe the Jews started the NAACP but clearly they are not a major influential part of that organization in our current culture.

Jews strike me as quite willing to intermarry and lose their identity.

The idea of Jews “controlling” our culture to set up the destruction of whites, particulalry in the United States, is a paranoid rant with little basis in fact.

If this Jim is the same one that posted earlier that Einstein was a fraud then his objectivity must be questioned.

The NAACP was a Jewish organisation for its first 50 years of existance. It was founded and led by jews. It never had a black president until relatively recently.
Rosa Parks was paid to sit on the bus, it was an assignment given to her- by the jewish communists in the NAACP. She was a paid employee of the NAACP.
Puritanism can lead to feminism. Feminism promotes pornography, promiscuity, destruction of the family. That is not exactly puritanism, but like everything in communism, things can seem the opposite of what they really are. Denmark is afflicted by a peculiar version of puritanism, but as always, it too leads to feminism.
Feminism is a communist plot.
Einstein was known as the “incorrigible plagiarist”. On the night he died, mossad agents armed with uzis burst into his office and took all his personal papers, to return them to Israel. Why did they do that? How did they get away with it? If the Chinese, or Australians, or any one else did that sort of thing there would be trouble. Einstein was not what he seemed, and was a jewish ethnic activist as well as a scientist. Every single equation in his 1905 relativity paper appeared before. Every single one!There is evidence also that his wife did much of his research/copying.
Why, if he worked it all out, is virtually nothing in relativity named after him? Minkowski spaces, Robertson-Walker metric, Lorentz-Fitzgerald transformations to name a few. Some of these pre-dated 1905. And nobody back then thought he deserved a nobel prize for his efforts. The media says hes the most brainy guy ever, and the media happens to be 99% jewish-run.

The the US media promotes feminism, race-mixing, communist ideas etc.

Try stop watching TV for a couple of years, and then look for the anti-white propaganda. Its everywhere. The US is not going to be a white country in 100 years – so much for the power of “white racism”. The white man has less power against minorites than he has against women. The public seems to think men still rule 100%, and some men do, but the average joe aint got a chance against all this.

http://www.henrymakow.com is a website run by a jewish guy who knows the truth too. Most jews don’t know what their leaders are up to either, or else it suits them to keep quiet- they like what’s happening. Tell your jewish friends that you don’t like multiculturalism and wish america was still a white country. See what reaction that gets. Discuss it with them. I bet they know far more about the true situation than they let on.

I can back all this up with facts, figures, data, etc until hell freezes over. Where do you want me to start?

Yap, men are handicaped by their need to make sense,

Who makes the feminism? You do, by not doing anything about it. First you talk to a blody cunt without any result, and because that didn’t work what you did, now you are looking for someone who is responisble for blody cunts to exist. Who gives a fuck if it’s Jews or Santa Clause?

If you are not doing what is right, it only = you are supporting it.

Are we gonna do something about it, or just keep enjoing it. The only thing we need to do is just to say – I don’t want your pussy. Fuck the sense, just do it. Problem solved.

Women on their own could not have pushed feminism as far as it has gone today. Only men in positions of power could have made it happen. According to one of the Rockefellers, “We … created the women’s movement, and we promote it. And it’s not about equal opportunity. It’s designed to get both parents out of the home and into the workforce, where they will pay taxes. And then we can decide how the children will be raised and educated.”

Strong, independent, father lead families are the biggest threat to their power and control over the people. Using feminism and divorce courts they are able to break them up and strip men of most or all of their power and influence in their own families.

Muzalon said:

Jim said:

Iwillchewyouupandspityouout said:

Is that wrong? There is such thing as diversity and it’s a little bit more diverse than just men.

So you don’t appreciate me being racist, I don’t appreciate you being sexist.
fuck you, yer wrong

I agree, there is some merit to racism. It is loyalty to your own people, and what is wrong with that?
The people most loyal to their own race, and yet most vocal against racism are the jews.
The jews created feminism to divide the sexes, the same as they created multiculturalism to destroy the white race.
And before anyone takes offence at this, read about the origins of multiculturalism for yourself, and read about the origins of feminism too.
They are one and the same – communist jews.
The NAACP was started and run by jews. In the 1890s (yes, that long ago)a jew even tried to enact a law forbidding a white woman to resist the sexual advances of a black man. Of course this law was blocked, but they will stop at nothing to destroy us and take the world.
Women are corrupted, but jews are worse. In their behaviour they are like a race of women. The parallels run deep.
Spielberg’s movie Amistad is anti-white propaganda, and hides the fact that most of the slave traders were jewish. They have always used the blacks to destroy white civilisations, and this goes back centuries.
They privately gloat amongst themselves about this. They hate us far more than we could ever hate them.
Not all jews are like this, of course, but like women most have bought the story that white men are out to get them.
The flood of blacks into western countries has only just begun. Before its finished, everybody will be racist.

This is the real reason men and women hate each other in western countries today.

What about the role of Anglo-Saxon puritanism in shaping feminism? Puritanism, by suppressing sex, automatically grants women ‘the Little Princess’ Syndrome. Also, this explains why feminism and misandry are most rampant in Anglo-Saxon countries.

I do not understand anti-semitism in our contemporary culture. Without a doubt Jews are disproportionately in positions of power and influence in America but I don’t think they are there because Jews seek power to control others (except over themselves and their fate, understandable) but they are there because they are very smart, and fall to places where their talents lie.

I’m doubtful of Jim’s arguments about Jews starting feminism. Women started feminism, with two wave movements (1920’s and 1970’s). If the women leading feminism happened to be Jewish, I don’t think they were promoting feminism to promote the fate of Jews. Maybe the Jews started the NAACP but clearly they are not a major influential part of that organization in our current culture.

Jews strike me as quite willing to intermarry and lose their identity.

The idea of Jews “controlling” our culture to set up the destruction of whites, particulalry in the United States, is a paranoid rant with little basis in fact.

If this Jim is the same one that posted earlier that Einstein was a fraud then his objectivity must be questioned.

Jim said:

Iwillchewyouupandspityouout said:

Is that wrong? There is such thing as diversity and it’s a little bit more diverse than just men.

So you don’t appreciate me being racist, I don’t appreciate you being sexist.
fuck you, yer wrong

I agree, there is some merit to racism. It is loyalty to your own people, and what is wrong with that?
The people most loyal to their own race, and yet most vocal against racism are the jews.
The jews created feminism to divide the sexes, the same as they created multiculturalism to destroy the white race.
And before anyone takes offence at this, read about the origins of multiculturalism for yourself, and read about the origins of feminism too.
They are one and the same – communist jews.
The NAACP was started and run by jews. In the 1890s (yes, that long ago)a jew even tried to enact a law forbidding a white woman to resist the sexual advances of a black man. Of course this law was blocked, but they will stop at nothing to destroy us and take the world.
Women are corrupted, but jews are worse. In their behaviour they are like a race of women. The parallels run deep.
Spielberg’s movie Amistad is anti-white propaganda, and hides the fact that most of the slave traders were jewish. They have always used the blacks to destroy white civilisations, and this goes back centuries.
They privately gloat amongst themselves about this. They hate us far more than we could ever hate them.
Not all jews are like this, of course, but like women most have bought the story that white men are out to get them.
The flood of blacks into western countries has only just begun. Before its finished, everybody will be racist.

This is the real reason men and women hate each other in western countries today.

What about the role of Anglo-Saxon puritanism in shaping feminism? Puritanism, by suppressing sex, automatically grants women ‘the Little Princess’ Syndrome. Also, this explains why feminism and misandry are most rampant in Anglo-Saxon countries.

Jim said:

Iwillchewyouupandspityouout said:

Is that wrong? There is such thing as diversity and it’s a little bit more diverse than just men.

So you don’t appreciate me being racist, I don’t appreciate you being sexist.
fuck you, yer wrong

I agree, there is some merit to racism. It is loyalty to your own people, and what is wrong with that?
The people most loyal to their own race, and yet most vocal against racism are the jews.
The jews created feminism to divide the sexes, the same as they created multiculturalism to destroy the white race.
And before anyone takes offence at this, read about the origins of multiculturalism for yourself, and read about the origins of feminism too.
They are one and the same – communist jews.
The NAACP was started and run by jews. In the 1890s (yes, that long ago)a jew even tried to enact a law forbidding a white woman to resist the sexual advances of a black man. Of course this law was blocked, but they will stop at nothing to destroy us and take the world.
Women are corrupted, but jews are worse. In their behaviour they are like a race of women. The parallels run deep.
Spielberg’s movie Amistad is anti-white propaganda, and hides the fact that most of the slave traders were jewish. They have always used the blacks to destroy white civilisations, and this goes back centuries.
They privately gloat amongst themselves about this. They hate us far more than we could ever hate them.
Not all jews are like this, of course, but like women most have bought the story that white men are out to get them.
The flood of blacks into western countries has only just begun. Before its finished, everybody will be racist.

This is the real reason men and women hate each other in western countries today.

I think we should differentiate between Zionists and Jews. If we are to believe the Protocols of the Elders of Zion (a possible Czarist forgery?), Zionists have been responsible for most of the great catatstrophes that have afflicted Western civilization since the subsequent expulsion of the Jews from Palestine after the Bar Cochba revolt of A.D. 135. Since 1945, Zionists have also been personally responsible for much of the internecine conflict in the Middle East. According to the Turner Diaries, the United States government, that most benighted of female-dominated matriarchies, is controlled by Zionists, collectively known as the Zionist Occupation Government (ZOG).

Furthermore, I would like to point out that apart from a few ignorant Zionists, and their corresponding Marxist and feminist sympathizers, the overwhelming majority of Jewish males are both non-religious in temperament and secular in outlook. Most Jewish men are stand up guys; many actually deplore the aims of international Zionism or, atleast, the more radical vision espoused by Theodor Herzl. As a matter of fact, Jews have contributed enormously to world culture, with most of the world’s greatest intellectuals and artists having been Jewish males.

However, I would like to add that all Jewish FEMALES certainly deserved to be roasted alive in the ovens of Auschwitz. If most Yankee American women had been shipped to Hitler’s death camps, the world would be a better place…

Iwillchewyouupandspityouout said:

Is that wrong? There is such thing as diversity and it’s a little bit more diverse than just men.

So you don’t appreciate me being racist, I don’t appreciate you being sexist.
fuck you, yer wrong

I agree, there is some merit to racism. It is loyalty to your own people, and what is wrong with that?
The people most loyal to their own race, and yet most vocal against racism are the jews.
The jews created feminism to divide the sexes, the same as they created multiculturalism to destroy the white race.
And before anyone takes offence at this, read about the origins of multiculturalism for yourself, and read about the origins of feminism too.
They are one and the same – communist jews.
The NAACP was started and run by jews. In the 1890s (yes, that long ago)a jew even tried to enact a law forbidding a white woman to resist the sexual advances of a black man. Of course this law was blocked, but they will stop at nothing to destroy us and take the world.
Women are corrupted, but jews are worse. In their behaviour they are like a race of women. The parallels run deep.
Spielberg’s movie Amistad is anti-white propaganda, and hides the fact that most of the slave traders were jewish. They have always used the blacks to destroy white civilisations, and this goes back centuries.
They privately gloat amongst themselves about this. They hate us far more than we could ever hate them.
Not all jews are like this, of course, but like women most have bought the story that white men are out to get them.
The flood of blacks into western countries has only just begun. Before its finished, everybody will be racist.

This is the real reason men and women hate each other in western countries today.

While I agree mostly, I disagree with the women being abused ( as a group that is). That’s something feminists made up to gain faux pity.

And just one last note: Once again if your just going to quote me and try to make me sound like a child or an ass, you’ve proved me right.

Extreme feminists are allowed in society, but chauvanism is seen as “ignorant” and “foolish”. What about the women who go around screaming that women are superior to men just because they can carry children. Notice I said carry and not create, because they need sperm to create life. Women don’t create life, they just carry it. They have the egg and we have the sperm.

And why do people believe that women should be treated equal, but just more “equal” than men. Many women want to be treated “equally” but demand that they be taken care of like a princess! That’s not equality, it’s almost like reverse sexism. And all you men and women who might quote me and try to make me sound like an ass might as well give up. Even they know it’s true.

There are people who believe the courts aren’t biased when they really are. Women will usually get custody of the children even if they aren’t as good at parenting as the man. It’s seen as “wierd” if a single man raises a child, but a single women with a child has the patience of a saint! Women aren’t forced to use sex as a way to sell things, they get paid to do it and they accept. That makes this argument invalid, since they agreed to do it.

So all you men and women who believe in “equality” should know that it can never happen. If we try to, then we end up putting one over the other, just like now. We try to put women into society, but now men are being discriminated against. When men were being revered, women took the abuse. Only a child or an idealist can ever believe that equality can be achieved, so maybe you men and women who argue against this site should look at it from both angles instead of crying “foul play”.

wow.. Thanks Dick I made it in your voicemail rants.. Woman are cunts discusting liars who use there tits and ass as a lever at life to get by.. But thats all i can expect of them.. I mean what else are they good for.. CUM DUMPSTERS!

Commander Scott said:

Iwillchewyouupandspityouout said:

that’s the third time I’ve been called a yankee cunt and I’ve never been more proud

For the record, that’s FRIGID Yankee cunt to you, you bloody sexless bitch.

Hey, don’t forget your secret weapon man…………………TELL HER HOW MUCH SHE LOVES CHEESEBURGERS!!!!!!!!!!
Sorry, carry on

Iwillchewyouupandspityouout said:

that’s the third time I’ve been called a yankee cunt and I’ve never been more proud

For the record, that’s FRIGID Yankee cunt to you, you bloody sexless bitch.

no manhole said:

Dawn said:

@ Arbalest- Guess I should have made some comment on her idiocy as well…she hasn’t stopped spewing her pointless dribble all over this site for the past 20 minutes…

She and Commander are double “dribbling”–ha ha. Sorta of like watching Itchy and Scratchy hitting each other with rubber mallets–and about as exciting.

haha I’ve noticed that- everytime I check the Recent Comments it’s a back-and forth insulting match between the two

that’s the third time I’ve been called a yankee cunt and I’ve never been more proud

Dawn said:

@ Arbalest- Guess I should have made some comment on her idiocy as well…she hasn’t stopped spewing her pointless dribble all over this site for the past 20 minutes…

She and Commander are double “dribbling”–ha ha. Sorta of like watching Itchy and Scratchy hitting each other with rubber mallets–and about as exciting.

@ Arbalest- Guess I should have made some comment on her idiocy as well…she hasn’t stopped spewing her pointless dribble all over this site for the past 20 minutes…

Iwillchewyouupandspityouout said:

Is that wrong? There is such thing as diversity and it’s a little bit more diverse than just men.

So you don’t appreciate me being racist, I don’t appreciate you being sexist.
fuck you, yer wrong

Go suck on a potassium cyanide capsule and die, you frigid, racist Yankee cunt.

Is that wrong? There is such thing as diversity and it’s a little bit more diverse than just men.

So you don’t appreciate me being racist, I don’t appreciate you being sexist.
fuck you, yer wrong

Amazing how women can skip all over another woman’s stupity to point out what a man did.

Commander Scott said:

Iwillchewyouupandspityouout said:

This is the gayest site in the world. Everyone’s just trying to validate that they are the best person in the world. what a bunch of jews haha. Well don’t act like your shit don’t stink cuz it’s WAY worse than any girl I’ve ever fucked. ehhhh…I’m going to go crawl in my vagina and sulk!

The overwhelming majority of Anglo-Saxon females in America, Canada, Great Britain, Australia, and New Zealand are racist, neo-Nazi anti-semites.

You’re the biggest racist I’ve seen on this site by far

Let’s just get the facts straight. I am a nazi

Iwillchewyouupandspityouout said:

This is the gayest site in the world. Everyone’s just trying to validate that they are the best person in the world. what a bunch of jews haha. Well don’t act like your shit don’t stink cuz it’s WAY worse than any girl I’ve ever fucked. ehhhh…I’m going to go crawl in my vagina and sulk!

The overwhelming majority of Anglo-Saxon females in America, Canada, Great Britain, Australia, and New Zealand are racist, neo-Nazi anti-semites.

well, that’s good, cuz I like animals more than I like men

box of treasure between my legs? I get such a kick out of this. It’s the most hypocritical statement I’ve ever heard. You and your ugly, veiny cock and since Jesus had one that makes you royalty. Well, guess what, the jews killed Jesus. Next guy that tries to get in my pants (hence my box of treasure) I’ll cut his cock off and rape him in the ass with it.

oh, joy

Iwillchewyouupandspityouout said:

mmm yummy. I’ve always wanted to be raped

You deserve to be raped, but not by another human being. You deserve to be raped by an animal such as a horse or a dog.

mmm yummy. I’ve always wanted to be raped

This is the gayest site in the world. Everyone’s just trying to validate that they are the best person in the world. what a bunch of jews haha. Well don’t act like your shit don’t stink cuz it’s WAY worse than any girl I’ve ever fucked. ehhhh…I’m going to go crawl in my vagina and sulk!

Iwillchewyouupandspityouout said:

I can guarantee Dick’s never getting his dick wet again. haha what a loser.
Hey I got a nice pussy you might wanna nibble dicky boy. I’m going to have my period all over your face, so drink up.

Bugger off the site, you frigid Anglo-Saxon bitch. Women such as yourself deserve to be on the receiving end of domestic violence. I bet you already know that women are brutally raped and murdered solely because of frigid Yankee cunts like you who imagine that they have some sort of treasure box between their legs.

Duuuurrrr I went 2 Calledge So I’m SMERT! DURR YOu IS Idiosynchriotic Dick. DUUUUUUUUUUUUUrrrrrrrr

I can guarantee Dick’s never getting his dick wet again. haha what a loser.
Hey I got a nice pussy you might wanna nibble dicky boy. I’m going to have my period all over your face, so drink up.

Lols, Idiosyncratic.

@Jim

“Some always want to be the train, some the tunnel”

lolol

An additional note to my last post is that this explains why there are different types of gays: the girly ones, the manly ones, some always want to be the train, some the tunnel, etc.
It depends on which part(s) of the development process were affected.

no manhole said:

Any idea if Newton was a homosexual?

He might have been. Often gays are high acheivers for the same reason as nerds: they didn’t fit in so well so they resort to work to give themselves fulfilment. Hard work is a large component of genius, although ability is necessary too. Newton was a loner and depressed. He was accused of stealing work off other men, maybe that’s true too?

I consider this to be the final word on homosexuality:
http://www.heretical.com/toa/toa-s03x.html

Gays are usually not genetic at all, but they are mostly born that way. Mothers who smoke a lot of pot can actually turn their son gay in the womb apparently. Many forms of homosexuality may be preventable too, according to this.

Gays these days do try to recruit straight boys into their fold. It can work, because sexuality is not so clear-cut. Confused teenagers are becoming even more confused, because of this. Gay propaganda and promotion should stop.

I don’t hate gays, but I hate it when they hit on me. That happens from time to time, and it’s creepy. Many of them believe that anyone can be turned gay, or that even straight guys will enjoy a bit on the down low. Their behaviour is often ultra annoying too, and I avoid them usually.

I really don’t think Dick is gay, and if he is, big deal, he still makes some pretty damn good points…

no manhole said:

Muzalon said:

BrokenJohnny said:

Muzalon said:

G said:

Women always insult Dick for being gay. As if that’s an insult. They are haters, and here’s why:

Ev Psych 101: women hate gays because they are the only people that have no use for women at all. They are terrified that too many men become gay, and then nobody will give a shit about them at all.

The men we sometimes hear calling Dick a fag are pussies because they are essentially doing women’s work. What should a guy care if another guy is gay? He loses nothing, and it actually means less competition for women, so he gains. Men who hate gays are pussy whipped.

Men are better than women.

PS some men hate gays because they associate it with being a pussy. There might be a statistical corrolation, but it is the acting like a pussy we should hate and not the gay.

That thesis about female homophobia is the one advanced by Dworkin in Right Wing Women – that gays make women sexually redundant – women’s deepest fear.

Many guys hate gays because they envy them – lots of disposable income, no brats, no bitch, no Divorce, no being fucked around by Anglo-American women, and (very often) superior intelligence (for biological reasons I won’t go into here).

Ah yes, not only is homosexuality genetic, but it bears greater intelligence as well. Brilliant stuff. I can only DREAM of where you dug up THAT little gem.

Let me guess, your liberal arts college? *starts a slow clap* Bravo my friend, bravo.

The reason many men dislike gays is incredibly simple: They find the act of two men kissing to utterly repulsive, it spills over into anger towards anyone who doesn’t.

End.

Not quite, fancy pants…

Actually, homosexuality is demonstrably related to birth order: the later one comes in the mother’s birth order, the more likely one is to be homosexual. Homosexuals also have different finger ratios to heterosexuals, because of prenatal hormone influences. In homosexual males, the ring and index fingers are the same length, like women’s; in hetero males, the ring finger is rather longer:

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v404/n6777/full/404455a0.html

All the reputable literature on this issue conforms to these conclusions. In fact, these findings have nothing to do with the liberal arts at all, they are socio-biological. By birthing a spread of siblings with different sexual orientations, the mother is preventing them competing for the same resources.

Homosexuality is one of the greatest conundrums in evolutionary psychology: since gay men leave no children, how can it persist in modern populations? It must be that it confers some advantage on the breeding siblings of the homosexual concerned. It takes no leap of the imagination to see then why homosexual men have historically been somewhat overrepresented in the ranks of genius – men like Plato, Alexander, Wittgenstein, Turing, Shakespeare – you know, men much more intelligent than, er… an intellectual/military/scientific nobody like you?

Also, the scion of an race like yours who paid lip service to ‘turning the other cheek’ and ‘blessing the meek’ for 2000 years really shouldn’t be critiquing the liberal arts too hard… your whole retarded ‘Christian culture’ is the liberal arts, as far as I’m concerned.

Any idea if Newton was a homosexual?

Thought to have had Asperger’s. Very probably homosexual, though – no hetero interests at all. The same with Kant.

Muzalon said:

BrokenJohnny said:

Muzalon said:

G said:

Women always insult Dick for being gay. As if that’s an insult. They are haters, and here’s why:

Ev Psych 101: women hate gays because they are the only people that have no use for women at all. They are terrified that too many men become gay, and then nobody will give a shit about them at all.

The men we sometimes hear calling Dick a fag are pussies because they are essentially doing women’s work. What should a guy care if another guy is gay? He loses nothing, and it actually means less competition for women, so he gains. Men who hate gays are pussy whipped.

Men are better than women.

PS some men hate gays because they associate it with being a pussy. There might be a statistical corrolation, but it is the acting like a pussy we should hate and not the gay.

That thesis about female homophobia is the one advanced by Dworkin in Right Wing Women – that gays make women sexually redundant – women’s deepest fear.

Many guys hate gays because they envy them – lots of disposable income, no brats, no bitch, no Divorce, no being fucked around by Anglo-American women, and (very often) superior intelligence (for biological reasons I won’t go into here).

Ah yes, not only is homosexuality genetic, but it bears greater intelligence as well. Brilliant stuff. I can only DREAM of where you dug up THAT little gem.

Let me guess, your liberal arts college? *starts a slow clap* Bravo my friend, bravo.

The reason many men dislike gays is incredibly simple: They find the act of two men kissing to utterly repulsive, it spills over into anger towards anyone who doesn’t.

End.

Not quite, fancy pants…

Actually, homosexuality is demonstrably related to birth order: the later one comes in the mother’s birth order, the more likely one is to be homosexual. Homosexuals also have different finger ratios to heterosexuals, because of prenatal hormone influences. In homosexual males, the ring and index fingers are the same length, like women’s; in hetero males, the ring finger is rather longer:

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v404/n6777/full/404455a0.html

All the reputable literature on this issue conforms to these conclusions. In fact, these findings have nothing to do with the liberal arts at all, they are socio-biological. By birthing a spread of siblings with different sexual orientations, the mother is preventing them competing for the same resources.

Homosexuality is one of the greatest conundrums in evolutionary psychology: since gay men leave no children, how can it persist in modern populations? It must be that it confers some advantage on the breeding siblings of the homosexual concerned. It takes no leap of the imagination to see then why homosexual men have historically been somewhat overrepresented in the ranks of genius – men like Plato, Alexander, Wittgenstein, Turing, Shakespeare – you know, men much more intelligent than, er… an intellectual/military/scientific nobody like you?

Also, the scion of an race like yours who paid lip service to ‘turning the other cheek’ and ‘blessing the meek’ for 2000 years really shouldn’t be critiquing the liberal arts too hard… your whole retarded ‘Christian culture’ is the liberal arts, as far as I’m concerned.

Any idea if Newton was a homosexual?

BrokenJohnny said:

Muzalon said:

G said:

Women always insult Dick for being gay. As if that’s an insult. They are haters, and here’s why:

Ev Psych 101: women hate gays because they are the only people that have no use for women at all. They are terrified that too many men become gay, and then nobody will give a shit about them at all.

The men we sometimes hear calling Dick a fag are pussies because they are essentially doing women’s work. What should a guy care if another guy is gay? He loses nothing, and it actually means less competition for women, so he gains. Men who hate gays are pussy whipped.

Men are better than women.

PS some men hate gays because they associate it with being a pussy. There might be a statistical corrolation, but it is the acting like a pussy we should hate and not the gay.

That thesis about female homophobia is the one advanced by Dworkin in Right Wing Women – that gays make women sexually redundant – women’s deepest fear.

Many guys hate gays because they envy them – lots of disposable income, no brats, no bitch, no Divorce, no being fucked around by Anglo-American women, and (very often) superior intelligence (for biological reasons I won’t go into here).

Ah yes, not only is homosexuality genetic, but it bears greater intelligence as well. Brilliant stuff. I can only DREAM of where you dug up THAT little gem.

Let me guess, your liberal arts college? *starts a slow clap* Bravo my friend, bravo.

The reason many men dislike gays is incredibly simple: They find the act of two men kissing to utterly repulsive, it spills over into anger towards anyone who doesn’t.

End.

Not quite, fancy pants…

Actually, homosexuality is demonstrably related to birth order: the later one comes in the mother’s birth order, the more likely one is to be homosexual. Homosexuals also have different finger ratios to heterosexuals, because of prenatal hormone influences. In homosexual males, the ring and index fingers are the same length, like women’s; in hetero males, the ring finger is rather longer:

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v404/n6777/full/404455a0.html

All the reputable literature on this issue conforms to these conclusions. In fact, these findings have nothing to do with the liberal arts at all, they are socio-biological. By birthing a spread of siblings with different sexual orientations, the mother is preventing them competing for the same resources.

Homosexuality is one of the greatest conundrums in evolutionary psychology: since gay men leave no children, how can it persist in modern populations? It must be that it confers some advantage on the breeding siblings of the homosexual concerned. It takes no leap of the imagination to see then why homosexual men have historically been somewhat overrepresented in the ranks of genius – men like Plato, Alexander, Wittgenstein, Turing, Shakespeare – you know, men much more intelligent than, er… an intellectual/military/scientific nobody like you?

Also, the scion of an race like yours who paid lip service to ‘turning the other cheek’ and ‘blessing the meek’ for 2000 years really shouldn’t be critiquing the liberal arts too hard… your whole retarded ‘Christian culture’ is the liberal arts, as far as I’m concerned.

Dawn said:

Wouldn’t gay men be considered REALLY manly men, seeing as how they love penises so much…..??

Oh please don’t go there.

Wouldn’t gay men be considered REALLY manly men, seeing as how they love penises so much…..??

So I guess that concludes the “gay topic”

I view gays the same way I do people who are into animal sex or pedophilia or fecal fetish. Its all repulsive and dont want to see it, hear about it, or be your buddy.

They’ve been trying to push the “accept gays” crap as much as the “women are equal to men” crap.

hah now i never said anything about her being on top ill put my foot on top of her head and say eat the bed bitch a girls gana have to catch me asleep to be on top

BrokenJohnny said:

studioline said:

@G

I could never and still can’t understand why some “straight” men hate gay people either. I guess they must feel low and look for some excuse to feel better. It’s hard for me to understand.

I don’t hate gay men. I used to party with a Lesbian friend and her gay guys friends a few years back, and we had a great time drinking and smoking together.

But the way some gays act really, really pisses me off. For example, faggots like the infamous Chris Crocker, who talks like a whiney fat black bitch and wears makeup like a girl? That pisses me off.

Why? Because it is making a mockery of my gender. And a mockery of humanity all together.

For example, how would a gay man feel if I posed as a gay man, and acted like a complete fool? What if I made fun of their fruity accents, their taste in clothing, and their sexual preference? They’d be pissed off.

And that is precisely what a lot of faggots like Chris Crocker are doing. He dresses like a woman, acts like a bitch, yet, he has a penis. He’s making a mockery of people who have penis’s.

Thanks for sharing that. Now I have a better understanding of it. I really didn’t realise that this could be the reason.

I can tell you my prospective on the same issue;

When I am for example with my gf, one of many topics we joke is gay men. I don’t have anything against gay man at all, and nothing bothers me about them at all. I even think I would not joke about them if it was not good for one of the joke topics with women. For ex I never joke with men about gay people, I don’t even lough at gay jokes, when told by men. But with women I just use it, because it shows up my personality. They see that Im openminded, have sense of humor, Im wanted not only by women but also by men, it’s women who love to joke about gay men. You can use it in many ways.

Dominic said:

yo women hmm (of man) will fuck you over in a quick min. i had a girl say o baby im on birth control its ok cum inside me is was feelin lucky dont have to go threw the ropes and pull out and shit next week she calls tellin me i gata a kid on the way ive had to go threw alot of shit because of those bitches and also hmm pay somes of money also so all those women that think Mr.Dick here is wrong screw your head on bitches and look at the real problems youv created

Looks like you are the one who got fucked by a girl. This is what happens when you let a woman decide, what and how to do it in bed. Women on top? yea righ. Women on top=more single mothers.

Muzalon said:

G said:

Women always insult Dick for being gay. As if that’s an insult. They are haters, and here’s why:

Ev Psych 101: women hate gays because they are the only people that have no use for women at all. They are terrified that too many men become gay, and then nobody will give a shit about them at all.

The men we sometimes hear calling Dick a fag are pussies because they are essentially doing women’s work. What should a guy care if another guy is gay? He loses nothing, and it actually means less competition for women, so he gains. Men who hate gays are pussy whipped.

Men are better than women.

PS some men hate gays because they associate it with being a pussy. There might be a statistical corrolation, but it is the acting like a pussy we should hate and not the gay.

That thesis about female homophobia is the one advanced by Dworkin in Right Wing Women – that gays make women sexually redundant – women’s deepest fear.

Many guys hate gays because they envy them – lots of disposable income, no brats, no bitch, no Divorce, no being fucked around by Anglo-American women, and (very often) superior intelligence (for biological reasons I won’t go into here).

Ah yes, not only is homosexuality genetic, but it bears greater intelligence as well. Brilliant stuff. I can only DREAM of where you dug up THAT little gem.

Let me guess, your liberal arts college? *starts a slow clap* Bravo my friend, bravo.

The reason many men dislike gays is incredibly simple: They find the act of two men kissing to utterly repulsive, it spills over into anger towards anyone who doesn’t.

End.

studioline said:

@G

I could never and still can’t understand why some “straight” men hate gay people either. I guess they must feel low and look for some excuse to feel better. It’s hard for me to understand.

I don’t hate gay men. I used to party with a Lesbian friend and her gay guys friends a few years back, and we had a great time drinking and smoking together.

But the way some gays act really, really pisses me off. For example, faggots like the infamous Chris Crocker, who talks like a whiney fat black bitch and wears makeup like a girl? That pisses me off.

Why? Because it is making a mockery of my gender. And a mockery of humanity all together.

For example, how would a gay man feel if I posed as a gay man, and acted like a complete fool? What if I made fun of their fruity accents, their taste in clothing, and their sexual preference? They’d be pissed off.

And that is precisely what a lot of faggots like Chris Crocker are doing. He dresses like a woman, acts like a bitch, yet, he has a penis. He’s making a mockery of people who have penis’s.

G said:

That’s interesting about Andrea Dworkin. I didn’t know she said such a thing. I was talking from an evolutionary psychological pov. Where did Dworkin get it from? Did she get it from that academic field, or did she just make it up and hate for the best?

She just made it up. It is true, though: that book, Right Wing Women, says a lot of truthful things about women. The thing is, it applies to ALL women, not just the wealthy WASPs she specifically excoriates.

He’s probably more useful than you though.

Lacuna Coil – Enjoy the Silene.

Dominic said:

yo women hmm (of man) will fuck you over in a quick min. i had a girl say o baby im on birth control its ok cum inside me is was feelin lucky dont have to go threw the ropes and pull out and shit next week she calls tellin me i gata a kid on the way ive had to go threw alot of shit because of those bitches and also hmm pay somes of money also so all those women that think Mr.Dick here is wrong screw your head on bitches and look at the real problems youv created

oh good. you’re breeding.

yo women hmm (of man) will fuck you over in a quick min. i had a girl say o baby im on birth control its ok cum inside me is was feelin lucky dont have to go threw the ropes and pull out and shit next week she calls tellin me i gata a kid on the way ive had to go threw alot of shit because of those bitches and also hmm pay somes of money also so all those women that think Mr.Dick here is wrong screw your head on bitches and look at the real problems youv created

G said:

Women always insult Dick for being gay. As if that’s an insult. They are haters, and here’s why:

Ev Psych 101: women hate gays because they are the only people that have no use for women at all. They are terrified that too many men become gay, and then nobody will give a shit about them at all.

The men we sometimes hear calling Dick a fag are pussies because they are essentially doing women’s work. What should a guy care if another guy is gay? He loses nothing, and it actually means less competition for women, so he gains. Men who hate gays are pussy whipped.

Men are better than women.

PS some men hate gays because they associate it with being a pussy. There might be a statistical corrolation, but it is the acting like a pussy we should hate and not the gay.

No gay that acts like a pussy (or effeminate) is ever, ever:
1.) quiet
2.) happy
3.) adequately sexed
Stop acting like a woman and you won’t be treated like one!

Michael calls sushi braindead but his skull is full of gravel.

Michael said:

In case it doesn’t, I’ll further clarify. Women are human, biological creatures. The imperative to have sex means she’ll do it if biologically she feels a need to.

Michael, are you going somewhere with this? If you want to say something then say it, I mean it could be interesting. I just can’t see what are you trying to say especialy with like 2 sentences long clarifications. Do you want to share some discovery you made? I mean every healthy man knows that women love sex, so…?

That’s interesting about Andrea Dworkin. I didn’t know she said such a thing. I was talking from an evolutionary psychological pov. Where did Dworkin get it from? Did she get it from that academic field, or did she just make it up and hate for the best?

Michael said:

In case it doesn’t, I’ll further clarify. Women are human, biological creatures. The imperative to have sex means she’ll do it if biologically she feels a need to.

While are you telling a woman how she feels about sex?

Actually I see now that’s what G said so I’m being redundant. Sorry.

Muzalon said:

G said:

Women always insult Dick for being gay. As if that’s an insult. They are haters, and here’s why:

Ev Psych 101: women hate gays because they are the only people that have no use for women at all. They are terrified that too many men become gay, and then nobody will give a shit about them at all.

The men we sometimes hear calling Dick a fag are pussies because they are essentially doing women’s work. What should a guy care if another guy is gay? He loses nothing, and it actually means less competition for women, so he gains. Men who hate gays are pussy whipped.

Men are better than women.

PS some men hate gays because they associate it with being a pussy. There might be a statistical corrolation, but it is the acting like a pussy we should hate and not the gay.

That thesis about female homophobia is the one advanced by Dworkin in Right Wing Women – that gays make women sexually redundant – women’s deepest fear.

Many guys hate gays because they envy them – lots of disposable income, no brats, no bitch, no Divorce, no being fucked around by Anglo-American women, and (very often) superior intelligence (for biological reasons I won’t go into here). No wonder many guys envy gay men – it makes perfect sense.

Actually, I have to disagree with the envy. Quite frankly I believe many guys hate gay men because we’re constantly compared to them. As we see here constantly the best insults women can think of is a insult to a man’s manhood. “yur not teh rel man, fag!” Really, after all the faggot insults growing up men would rather they go away just to stop hearing about them(at least that’s how it was for me anywho) While just my own theory and experience men who hate gay men just haven’t realize it’s not their or the gay men fault that they’re being compared, but it’s just a woman’s excuse against criticism.

In case it doesn’t, I’ll further clarify. Women are human, biological creatures. The imperative to have sex means she’ll do it if biologically she feels a need to.

sushi said:

i’ve never once slept with a guy a) the first time i met him or b) that i wasn’t that into.

I’ll clarify for your smallish brain then. If you don’t seem like a long term prospect, she’ll fuck you and chuck you but she’ll need alcohol to do it. Guys will do the same thing except alcohol isn’t a necessity. Hope this helps!

Muzalon said:

G said:

Women always insult Dick for being gay. As if that’s an insult. They are haters, and here’s why:

Ev Psych 101: women hate gays because they are the only people that have no use for women at all. They are terrified that too many men become gay, and then nobody will give a shit about them at all.

The men we sometimes hear calling Dick a fag are pussies because they are essentially doing women’s work. What should a guy care if another guy is gay? He loses nothing, and it actually means less competition for women, so he gains. Men who hate gays are pussy whipped.

Men are better than women.

PS some men hate gays because they associate it with being a pussy. There might be a statistical corrolation, but it is the acting like a pussy we should hate and not the gay.

That thesis about female homophobia is the one advanced by Dworkin in Right Wing Women – that gays make women sexually redundant – women’s deepest fear.

Many guys hate gays because they envy them – lots of disposable income, no brats, no bitch, no Divorce, no being fucked around by Anglo-American women, and (very often) superior intelligence (for biological reasons I won’t go into here). No wonder many guys envy gay men – it makes perfect sense.

I envy them because they get all the sex they want, and don’t have to go through the crazy-stupid girl hoops to get it. Must be nice. Frankly, I find having a sex drive (as a heterosexual) to be an incredible annoyance.

@SOTS- I can’t imagine I have many more material possessions than you do. My place is sparsely decorated with material crap; I don’t have a plasma TV or a expensive, fancy car, and I still eat on the plates I had in college.

I’ll keep this short b/c I imagine your tired of hearing from me. I was a high school teacher for several years. I imagine that you could do the same, teaching History. You have the intellect to complete the education/degree requirements. Teaching history is a very important job (“Those who do not understand history are condemned to repeat it” Satyanna). Why not do something great?

Hopefully this post will get through this time. See Ya.

G said:

Women always insult Dick for being gay. As if that’s an insult. They are haters, and here’s why:

Ev Psych 101: women hate gays because they are the only people that have no use for women at all. They are terrified that too many men become gay, and then nobody will give a shit about them at all.

The men we sometimes hear calling Dick a fag are pussies because they are essentially doing women’s work. What should a guy care if another guy is gay? He loses nothing, and it actually means less competition for women, so he gains. Men who hate gays are pussy whipped.

Men are better than women.

PS some men hate gays because they associate it with being a pussy. There might be a statistical corrolation, but it is the acting like a pussy we should hate and not the gay.

That thesis about female homophobia is the one advanced by Dworkin in Right Wing Women – that gays make women sexually redundant – women’s deepest fear.

Many guys hate gays because they envy them – lots of disposable income, no brats, no bitch, no Divorce, no being fucked around by Anglo-American women, and (very often) superior intelligence (for biological reasons I won’t go into here). No wonder many guys envy gay men – it makes perfect sense.

@G

I could never and still can’t understand why some “straight” men hate gay people either. I guess they must feel low and look for some excuse to feel better. It’s hard for me to understand.

Your arrogance is in thinking you understand me because your type is college educated and no matter how much bullshit you run into you still have financial security and online video games and plasma televisions to vent into.

Men in my camp are peasants. We have nothing but revolutionary fervour and gentle souls turned supernova by betrayal. It’s a dangerous combination. Men of European genetic ancestry have far more coordination and cohesion.. and far less roadblocks like pathetic tribal and religious hatreds the Arabs suffer.

Nor is there any possibilty of me being greatness in anything this society considers such. The ‘bible belt’ is a wretched hive of meth, scum, and villiany. The only middle class jobs are operated on the ‘good ole boy’ system, the pathetic paying service jobs are given to cunts to feed their bastards food and their boyfriends ice and xanax.

The Army is the only escape.. but I’d rather die than use my talent to conquer masculine societies in the name of the Witch of the West for frycook wages just because no one paid for my “education” so I could be an officer. I mean a vaginal society can’t allow peasants to become officers just because of their skill as soldiers can it? They need 4 years minimum of feminization camp.

In the end.. my destiny is set in stone. A million factors up to this point have led to it and I would be arrogant to turn away from it. I’ve given myself to the dark and I will hold up my end of the pact.

son of the suns said:

I sense you are losing your arrogance slowly.

So enlighten us all to your theory why I became what I did. I’m not scared for all to see.

Its not that scary. My guess is that you received the ultimate betrayal of all, from what I can piece together: You were completely in love with your fiancee, and she cheated on you. Its hard for me to imagine anything worse than that.

Its understandable why you are angry. Many men would have committed suicide after such an act, for example.

I agree with you: there are practically no decent single women out there. And based on this reality, you have condemned the entire gender. But I did say no “decent single women”, b/c there are a bunch of great ones in marriages, and on a rare occasion I meet a single girl that seems to be decent. Just my experience.

One more thing: I will be as gentle but direct as possible. If you feel that it is arrogant of me to think that I could possibly know something about how you might feel, I would say in return that it is equally arrogant to think that someone, after learning something about you, could not possibly understand you. If this is holding you back from receiving outside help, and disabling you from being the best person you can be, don’t let it. Nothing wrong about getting outside help. You can accept the advice or refuse it. Best Wishes.

Women always insult Dick for being gay. As if that’s an insult. They are haters, and here’s why:

Ev Psych 101: women hate gays because they are the only people that have no use for women at all. They are terrified that too many men become gay, and then nobody will give a shit about them at all.

The men we sometimes hear calling Dick a fag are pussies because they are essentially doing women’s work. What should a guy care if another guy is gay? He loses nothing, and it actually means less competition for women, so he gains. Men who hate gays are pussy whipped.

Men are better than women.

PS some men hate gays because they associate it with being a pussy. There might be a statistical corrolation, but it is the acting like a pussy we should hate and not the gay.

I sense you are losing your arrogance slowly.

So enlighten us all to your theory why I became what I did. I’m not scared for all to see.

son of the suns said:

no manhole said:

son of the suns said:

Strike him down for his sins and join me, NMH.

Darth Vader speaks, I am flattered by your call. No thanks. But If I may say so, I feel I have some understanding of why you are the way you are. I really don’t know what to say to you, but I think there are opportunities for you to express your greatness in the content of our society. I know you are probably disgusted by this statement but thats the best I can do for you now. Good day.

And why am I what I am, oh oracle?

Do you feel the following statement is arrogant: ” But If I may say so, I feel I have some understanding of why you are the way you are.” ?

no manhole said:

son of the suns said:

Strike him down for his sins and join me, NMH.

Darth Vader speaks, I am flattered by your call. No thanks. But If I may say so, I feel I have some understanding of why you are the way you are. I really don’t know what to say to you, but I think there are opportunities for you to express your greatness in the content of our society. I know you are probably disgusted by this statement but thats the best I can do for you now. Good day.

And why am I what I am, oh oracle?

Michael said:

Here’s the rule guys. If she’s not that into you, she’ll sleep with you the first night she meets you. If she is into you, she won’t. Same rule applies for us, don’t it? Men and women are more alike than you guys like to think and it kills you. If you want to meet a nice chick, you’ll have to better yourselves first.

i’ve never once slept with a guy a) the first time i met him or b) that i wasn’t that into.

Hey Dick,

Great site, and insight!

I have been lurking around here for a while reading your articles, and the comments that follow. I don’t know what is more manly, the clarity of your brilliance & wit, or your ‘I just don’t give a fuck’ courage to say what needs to be said.

Underlying the hysterical hyperbole of the upward thrusting skyscraper that is MABTW is a foundation of solid concrete truth reinforced with a lattice of tempered man-awesomeness.

Keep up the good work,

Buster

son of the suns said:

Strike him down for his sins and join me, NMH.

Darth Vader speaks, I am flattered by your call. No thanks. But If I may say so, I feel I have some understanding of why you are the way you are. I really don’t know what to say to you, but I think there are opportunities for you to express your greatness in the content of our society. I know you are probably disgusted by this statement but thats the best I can do for you now. Good day.

And that’s why they are so angry, because they won’t ever have a clue, because they never started to learn it. They can only realy on our copmetence, that’s why their whole movement is bs. They are not angry at us they are angry at themselves.

Michael, what are you talking about? Who should care what her dating strategy is, and why men should adjust to it? I heve never heard of a man who was glad he gave in to woman’s leading, for ex look even at the responces you got. The difference between men and woman is that there are men who know how to seduce, but I have never heard of a woman who had a clue how to do it. Every man form the age of 15 must learn it, women on the other hand are never asked to learn it, that’s why they won’t ever have a clue.

Strike him down for his sins and join me, NMH.

Yep, would be nice to download rest of voicemails.

Fuck you :P

Michael said:

Here’s the rule guys. If she’s not that into you, she’ll sleep with you the first night she meets you. If she is into you, she won’t. Same rule applies for us, don’t it? Men and women are more alike than you guys like to think and it kills you. If you want to meet a nice chick, you’ll have to better yourselves first.

You are completely hapless. Women think completely differently then men. Their evolutionary-honed instincts are based on different goals (the care of their offspring) than our instincts (to fertilize as many females as possible). You appear to be a brain-washed simpleton, who will bobble his head to any bullshit a female says so that he can get sex. In the end, you will pay….dearly.

Michael said:

Here’s the rule guys. If she’s not that into you, she’ll sleep with you the first night she meets you. If she is into you, she won’t. Same rule applies for us, don’t it? Men and women are more alike than you guys like to think and it kills you. If you want to meet a nice chick, you’ll have to better yourselves first.

We’re not women, Michelle, so no it doesn’t apply to us. Second, who cares? Fuck off.

Here’s the rule guys. If she’s not that into you, she’ll sleep with you the first night she meets you. If she is into you, she won’t. Same rule applies for us, don’t it? Men and women are more alike than you guys like to think and it kills you. If you want to meet a nice chick, you’ll have to better yourselves first.

Truth apparently angers the female mind.

Hey, another dickline. While these are awesome any chance of setting up 2 and 4 for download here too? I wanted to download them and listen to the complete set at once.

A wise man once said, “Female anger is the weathervane of truth.” These women are so angry at the fact that they are not as good as men, so it must be true.

The amount of anger women have for an idea is directly proportional to the truthfulness of the idea.

Dumb broads.