Good post Reckless. Someone has to make sure the lunacy doesn’t go on unchecked.

Actually skank you don’t have biology on your side, and anyone with common sense would know that.

1) Rebuttal: I’d like to see your numbers on that. Considering that most of the poor and destitute are women with children, I’m hard pressed to believe that women are taking care of themselves more. Furthermore, if they were, why the huge press with all these skanks demanding paternity and alimony payments. Most of these skanks are broke, and pop out a baby just so they can get CS/alimony.

2 (yes, 2 comes after 3 honey)) Rebuttal: Once again, I’d like to see you numbers on how many women are deciding not to have children. Most of the time, a woman decides to have a child in a failed attempt to snare a man, it doesn’t work, and she becomes a single mother. In any case, when it comes to having children, the decision is more the father’s than the mother’s (and I’ll explain that in a minute).

3 (or whatever the fuck number you’re on)) Rebuttal: Yeah you know the drill: numbers please. Are we talking about unmarried women, or _divorced_ women. I’m quite sure that if you married a guy, got half his stuff, and didn’t have to work anymore/could repeat the process, you would live a lot longer than some skank who actually did have to work to butter her bread. As for unmarried men dying a lot younger, I believe it’s more on the average of 3 or 4 years younger, not this huge leap in generations you seem to be implying. Also, I think that there are a lot more questions to ask than simply “who lives longer.” I’m sure a slave would live a lot longer than an explorer, but who has the better life? Single people and married people have different lifestyles. Chances are married men live slightly longer because they’re at home or work more. How were those numbers figured up: did they count in every guy who died as soon as he turned 18, every guy who was married and got divorced, every guy who just isn’t married yet?Chances are, seeing how marriage isn’t a default state, and that men have to work harder and be considerably more well off to be marriagable (as opposed to just being 16 with breasts), I can see how more men would die before or without being married.

Now, as for biology being on your side (and number 2), it isn’t. Short reason why: you’re on a clock skanks. Regardless of how many hormones you take, your eggs are only good for so long, and then they get old and useless. On the other hand, men can reproduce effectively up until and including the day they die. We don’t have any biological clock spreading our legs open one day before we hit 40. Ergo, any man can wait as long as he wants for the right woman to come along, and still have children. You’re on a time limit: trick as many men as you can into breeding with your stinking cunt in 20 or so yrs, or else your blood dies with you. Furthermore, men only need money and/or power to be attractive to a woman. Only youth, kindness, and decency can make a woman attractive to a man. Western women lost any shred of kindness and decency generations ago, and most of you whore around until you’re 40, then want to have kids, looking like a wrinkled sagging prune. Why: while you were out whoring around playing stupid games I was busting my ass to make something of myself. When I marry some Cambodian girl half my age and make her the mother of my children simply because I can, don’t get indignant: see Western women slut around because they think they can, but they don’t seem to realize that they can’t. However, men can play the waiting game, and have been doing so for eons. And what’s more, our _biology_ (as you so like to vaunt) let’s us do it, and encourages us to do it. That’s life bitch suck it up.

PS: Christianj, nice to see you here as well. Nice to see you modding the forums over here as well.

I’m fine thanks, and so’s my biology.

I don’t need luck sweetheart cause I’ve got biology on my side.
Good luck to you lot you’ll sure as hell need it.

Yeah… that’s right, Female.
It’s all about women choosing not to marry…

Good luck.

Very well stated Reckless, good to see some good commentary amoungst the angst, handwringing and dregs.

Riding on the backs of men? Pfft. You’ve got to be joking.

Let’s consider what is currently going on in Japan, Australia, Canada, Europe and the US.
Marriage rate down, fertility rating drastically declining.
Ever thought why fellas?

There are many reasons for this, I shall list some because you all clearly never moved on from concrete thinking and can’t consider another person’s point of view.

1. Women are providing for themselves. The only reason they couldn’t before was because they were trapped by children. The pill wasn’t around and abortions were illegal (typical male decision aimed at keeping women trapped in the home).

3. Women no longer need to marry men because they can decide not to have children, and the whole stigma of being unmarried and pregnant has rightly fucked off. Nice little stigma that one, perpetuated by the Church, which of course is run by MEN (in frocks, ha!)

4. Research proves unmarried women are far better off than married women. Quite simply, they live longer because they don’t have to put up with men’s bullshit. Unmarried men do not fair as well as married men, in short they die a lot younger. Guess they always need a godamn mummy to do everything for them. Nothing is more pathetic than a man who doesn’t know how to cook or clean.

In short, women control the decision to work or breed, women control the decision to marry or not. Women control and determine how your lives will pan out. Get the fuck used to it.

I agree.

While I agree with you, Woody, that decor, civility, and most of all pity should and do prevent a man from deriding a woman, you have to admit, she is a cunt.

At this point I don’t think the hate accusations will ever end. Even if they are groundless.

-Dick

“Yeah that’s right Wolfe, or, shall I call you hairy? Furry? Idiot?

Not that I should waste my time justifying myself to you hypocritcal, massively bigotted, blind as fuck dumbarses..but I will. Cause I care. Just the sort of person I am.

I don’t give a rats if you “gentlemen� hate women or fuck hollowed out logs, what you choose to hate/love and where you choose to stick your dick is your concern, not mine. I don’t care if you form a men’s group, feck off to the forest, beat your chests, reclaim each other’s manliness and end the night in tears of joy or shame. Like I said. Not my concern.

I don’t even care if you bitch about women in the pub, car, at home/work or in the lav. What I do care about though is this hate-fueling site being publicly accessible. If you’ve got a gripe with the better sex, then form a fucking private users group for your tales of woe. The rest of the world shouldn’t have to put up with unfortunately coming across this site of tripe.”

1) Apparently you do give a fuck if men run off to the forest, or talk about women in pubs, or anywhere else, as this site is pretty far removed from any skanks forum or webpage, and it’s not something that you would trip over accidentially. The only reason one would be here is to a) emphatically agree, or b) emphatically troll. If you disagree you do what most intelligent internet users have been doing ever since browsers had back buttons and use it.

2) Hate filled site? Please. So I suppose the SCUM website, and HeartlessBitches.com aren’t derogatory towards men and as such don’t fall under your astute definition of “hate filled?” Once again, for the stupid, or those incapable of logic or restraint, there is nothing making you read or post to this page. Furthermore, they have every right to express their viewpoints here, the same way you skanks do on your hate blogs. Difference is, men don’t really care if you congregate on a message board to assissinate masculinity: we just won’t deal with you. On the other hand, you do care if men get together to discuss how not to get assraped by the gynocracy: as stated earlier (to you), women need men, even when they say they don’t need men. The thought of women leaving men alone does nothing to men. The thought of men leaving women alone terrifies the shit out of you, because then you’d have to work for your shit, and couldn’t ride on the backs of men and live life without forethought and sacrifice.

Hairy? Furry? Idiot? Wit again eludes you. Or are you trying to say that you are yet another of these women in this thread with kinky internet sex obsessions; in this case a penchant for furry plush toy imbeciles? You should consider seeking psychiatric help if that is the case.

“Not that I should waste my time justifying myself to you hypocritcal, [sic] massively bigotted, [sic] blind as fuck dumbarses [sic].. [sic]but I will.� Indeed, why should you?

Nice spelling. Good punctuation.

“What I do care about though is this hate-fueling site being publicly accessible.� As Dick says, this site is not about hating women. Instead, it’s a sober look at some of the myriad ways in which men are better than women.

Let’s recap what happened here.

Dick wrote a brief analysis of a scientific study from Brunel University. I, and others, commented cogently on the study. We exchanged our thoughts and ideas. You came flouncing in, in violation of the terms of service of this site, and proceeded to curse and insult individual members of this thread. Actually I should say, “attempt to insult�, for even at that you failed rather miserably. Your abusive intrusion has been dealt with remarkably politely, for we are aware that, being a woman, you are not as rational as a man or as independent a moral actor.

I’ve a suggestion to add to Alen’s (“do what any sane, rational person would do and move on�).

If you disagree with the contents of this site, start your own. Make it about kittens, or fuzzy bunnies or dreams and pixie dust; whatever your little heart desires. Curse men out there to your heart’s content and bask in a warm glow of reflected glory from the shadow of a phosphor screen.

With love for women everywhere,
-Wolfe

I am unimpressed with this conversation, where people, both male and female, have resorted to personal attacks to win an argument. Calling a woman a “cunt” is unecessary, especially over the internet.

Women are Fascists. Plain and simple. This site is not about hating women, Female. In fact the only place where hate is openly displayed on this site is by women.

Men are better than women.

-Dick

Unfortunately your attitude flies in the face of the concept of freedom of expression. No one is forced to read this site; and those that would find it objectionable are urged not to.

You are as guilty as anyone in fueling hate. Hopefully you are mature enough to take responsibility for your own actions without blaming them on others.

If you really don’t care, then you should do what any sane, rational person would do; and move on.

Yeah that’s right Wolfe, or, shall I call you hairy? Furry? Idiot?

Not that I should waste my time justifying myself to you hypocritcal, massively bigotted, blind as fuck dumbarses..but I will. Cause I care. Just the sort of person I am.

I don’t give a rats if you “gentlemen” hate women or fuck hollowed out logs, what you choose to hate/love and where you choose to stick your dick is your concern, not mine. I don’t care if you form a men’s group, feck off to the forest, beat your chests, reclaim each other’s manliness and end the night in tears of joy or shame. Like I said. Not my concern.

I don’t even care if you bitch about women in the pub, car, at home/work or in the lav. What I do care about though is this hate-fueling site being publicly accessible. If you’ve got a gripe with the better sex, then form a fucking private users group for your tales of woe. The rest of the world shouldn’t have to put up with unfortunately coming across this site of tripe.

Ah, Female, your wit devastates us all. Or not.

Your post is so boringly typical of women of a certain type; it opens with an insult, is irrelevant, and closes with a curse. No doubt you are well-pleased with yourself.

Gents, I also see I missed most of one of the more amusing posters. A “Female/White Supremacist” with large numbers of perverse internet sexual relationships who’s staunchly pro-death. What a treat. I see she had the requisite shoddy grammar and spelling. Another typical less rational bigoted woman. I suppose “Female” will follow in the same mold.

-Wolfe

“Don’t apologize to anybody for being what you should be.”

What a soppy fuck

No problem gents, glad to help with my small contribution. Tech 1017 gave Mancoat the heads up. I don’t know if anyone here frequents that board a lot, but it’s another board for sensible men who are tired of women’s bullshit, the gynocracy that this world is becoming, and idiocy in general. Just so you know, you are not alone in the least in this battle. We have professors, business owners, millionaires, researchers, geinuses, military, ex-military, nuts, grunts, and more that have your back if you need it. So if you ever find yourself overrun and up to your neck in tampons and douches, just give a holler, and your brothers in arms will come running.

Excellent blog btw: I found the articles on women attempting to box and that idiot posterskank Danica Patrick to be hilarious. Keep up the good fight, and remember, being a man is a good thing, something to be proud of, and if a skank can’t handle it, fuck her with a mangina’s dick. Don’t apologize to anybody for being what you should be.

If we removed everything from her trailer made by men all she would have left is the “Helena Rubenstein anti-wrinkle cream” that does not work.

Bummer…

Steve walks warrily down the street, his brim pulled way down low. hahaha.