T-bag, many thanks for typing what I was thinking but could not be assed stating. You have self-sacrified your own time for naught though I’m afraid. These people revel in their cult of the retarded.

Doubt said:
How hard is it to look at something and say:
MEN MAKE BETTER PARENTS THAN WOMEN.
That’s all there is to say. If the men were automatically the primary caregivers, America would not be a utopia but our children would be better off. Just admit you are wrong and move on, Rachel.

It’s extremely hard to say that when you seem to think that children with severe mental disorders are better off than ones with low self esteem.

King Wang said:

Good point.

But how is it a loss if serial killers can be pointed to clean out the stupid ones, and the strippers keep on being trained by Mommy?

Methinks we should examine THAT aspect.

Hey, knowing your neighbor is nuts and going to whack out that asshole across the street while you are at a titty bar would……rule. Manly.

Obviously you know nothing of Antisocial Behavioural Disorder. People suffering from it go against lawful behaviour, or rules, or whatever people tell them to do. They don’t obey people mindlessly, they’re not animals. You wouldn’t be able to ‘point out the stupid ones’.
It would not rule if the neighbour walked up to you and slit your throat. They lack remorse, empathy, they’re aggresive, manipulative and are not ‘hitmen’.
Oh, and not only has this disorder been linked to lack of a mother figure, but also back to alcoholic fathers.

King Wang said:

Oh yes, we all remember T-Bag Timmy and his ruthless and female approach to “rightness” by speaking forever.

Here’s to hoping a small mind like his own doesn’t start a dissertation on “How T-Bag Speaketh But Say Nothing At All”.

As usual T-Bong, being long-winded only proves you have a lot of hot air in your head, it means not at all you have anything to say.

Your rants prove nothing but a disagreeable dog barking at 3am, and never shutting up. You SHOULD be a woman, you most definitely ACT like one.

Essentially, you prove everything I said of your kind, you have no argument, and you only whine to do so, not to prove shit.
The stupid rarely resort to saying anything of import, stupid.

This is like making fun of a retard on a short bus, fun, amusing, and not at all a challenge, since the fucking idiot IS no challenge.

As always, emptying your head because you can doesn’t make you right or smart, but being stupid you will never understand it…….the saviour of your kind is someone like me pointing out exactly how fucking stupid you really are.

Your name is King Wang.
I could actually just state that and win the argument like *clicks fingers* that.
Your name is King wang.
I have won.
Now it’s time to rub salt in the wound by destroying you.

I do tend to speak a lot, I concede, but it’s hardly a female approach to ‘rightness’

You think I speakth but say nothing at all, but the majority of the time I have to repeat myself.

T-Bong? Wow, that was so witty and humorous I think I pissed myself, I mean like, you replaced the second word of my name with ‘bong’
with comedic genius like that you must get all of the girls.

Your comment is a perfect example of your complaint against me. All you are saying is that I have said nothing at all
but King Wang
theres a difference between saying nothing at all
and you just not understanding it. I act like a woman, you mean i’m right? ow man, some of the other big boys on here wont be pleased about that =(

I’d say that you were a barking dog at 3 AM, but dogs have such a higher intelligence than you it would be an insult to compare them to you.

”Essentially, you prove everything I said of your kind, you have no argument, and you only whine to do so, not to prove shit.”
o.o
In the last paragraph you said I was man.
You just said that all men have no arguement and only whine to do so, not to prove shit.
People on here won’t like you defending woman King Wang.
Nice contradictions.

The same could be said for this whole wesbite. You know, the stupid never say anything important.

You make fun of retards on short buses,was this your school bus? Yes it was, wasn’t it? It’s okay King Wang, I won’t make fun of the fact that you’re a disabled child. I understand its not your failt that you still have to wear nappies, and it’s not your fault your still breastfed by your mum.

Next comment, point out somthing that I said that you don’t understand and I will explain it to you. I will hold your hand through the process so don’t you worry ^^

If I am stupid King Wang, I hate to think what you would be classified as.
Severe retardation… that’s a good one, but it doesn’t even come close to describing you =)

Bwha, what? Where does the bitch-wife driving her hubby away even begin to enter into this? How hard is it to look at something and say:
MEN MAKE BETTER PARENTS THAN WOMEN.
That’s all there is to say. If the men were automatically the primary caregivers, America would not be a utopia but our children would be better off. Just admit you are wrong and move on, Rachel.

Ray said:
But personally I’d prefer having society over run by strippers instead of serial killers, wouldn’t you?

Good point.

But how is it a loss if serial killers can be pointed to clean out the stupid ones, and the strippers keep on being trained by Mommy?

Methinks we should examine THAT aspect.

Hey, knowing your neighbor is nuts and going to whack out that asshole across the street while you are at a titty bar would……rule. Manly.

Your stats are flawed because of the fact that there are more single mothers than single fathers. I thought you would have had the intelligence and mathematical skills to use ratio, to make the point slightly more reliable

Don’t fuck around with the rest of her message, I just had to read the first part to realize that she’s introverted and stupid like any other pasty little girly-girl.
If you go to a library and analyze the information given at the chart right at the bottom HERE:
http://christianparty.net/sfh.htm
you will find that it falls in accordance with the information offered. It is not questionable - if you cared so much about proving us wrong, you would go to a fucking library. But this is a stupid little girly-girl - she’s the kind of bitch who cries, screaming about how somehow she has a right to marry a man for his money but then a man is sexist for not marrying her ugly, fat ass. Well, let’s see, are you intelligent? Well, you have to constantly insist on your superiority but no.
Moving on, because our little whore is having trouble with comprehension, I will prove her wrong:
In accordance to the Texas juvenile prison records:
% Prison Population % of All Families Factor Relative to 2-parent Household
(Removed to avoid confusion)
Single Mother Household 75% 26% 2.9:1 9.3X
———–
Single Father Household 1% 6% 1:6 0.5X
———–
(Removed to avoid confusion)
(Removed to avoid confusion)

Read:
YEAH, BITCH, YOU’RE WRONG - NOW EAT SHIT AND DIE, CUNT, YOU’RE FUCKING WRONG AND IT’S IN YOUR FAT FUCKING FACE!
Ya know what would make you shut up? My cock in your mouth. Don’t try to breathe out your mouth, you’ll choke ;D
http://www.myfreegraphics.com/images/fulls/fat-girls-give-the-best-hea d.0.jpg
Want to prove me wrong? Pull up some census data, cockmongling whore. Won’t that feel good? Proving me wrong with facts, not just talking about how the fact your boyfriend titfucked you last night somehow makes you better than me?

Now, I know for a fact that she did not check the site or else she would have attacked the source for the fact that they have a few outrageous things out there. However, once again, that is not the way you question statistics. The only way to fight statistics is with additional statistics, complete with a reputable source and… oh, wait, I’m talking to a self-centered cunt who would see a man beaten to death if it made her look like less of a whore. For the rest of us, I’m going to slowly but surely pull out that wild card I’ve kept pressed against her eyeballs. I hope this doesn’t catch her by surprise.

I would love to directly quote the census, but then for some reason sociology reports these days seem bad at giving plain numbers and charts, but rather twisting things out so that ‘camwhore mother’ becomes ‘hitting the streets to feed her children’ and all of the other mental-masturbation bullshit you whores gobble up.

My faith in american men has waned yet again, and I love the way that you couldn’t say anything about the fact that the majority of people held in prison and detention centers were male =)

Who raised them? See, you need to accept the fact that you’re just mediocre scum, just like any rich white camwhore slut.

Doubt said:

http://christianparty.net/sfh.htm
Simply put, if the divorce courts favored men as the primary caregivers, society as a whole would be better off. Seeing as how people like you have trouble applying logic and reason to a situation, I’m afraid that’s how things will have to turn out.

‘Antisocial Personality disorder’, the disorder that all serial killers suffer from. “We are rare and we are mostly men.”
The majority of Serial killers are men, and 3% of men are sociopaths. Antisocial Personality disorder is caused by ‘maternal deprivation’ in the first five years of a childs life.
In other words, lack of a mother can turn people into serial killers.

Fathers are responsible for developing the self esteem in a child, especially in daughters. Hence the reason why a lot of fatherless women are strippers.

But personally I’d prefer having society over run by strippers instead of serial killers, wouldn’t you?

Oh yes, we all remember T-Bag Timmy and his ruthless and female approach to “rightness” by speaking forever.

Here’s to hoping a small mind like his own doesn’t start a dissertation on “How T-Bag Speaketh But Say Nothing At All”.

As usual T-Bong, being long-winded only proves you have a lot of hot air in your head, it means not at all you have anything to say.

Your rants prove nothing but a disagreeable dog barking at 3am, and never shutting up. You SHOULD be a woman, you most definitely ACT like one.

Essentially, you prove everything I said of your kind, you have no argument, and you only whine to do so, not to prove shit.
The stupid rarely resort to saying anything of import, stupid.

This is like making fun of a retard on a short bus, fun, amusing, and not at all a challenge, since the fucking idiot IS no challenge.

As always, emptying your head because you can doesn’t make you right or smart, but being stupid you will never understand it…….the saviour of your kind is someone like me pointing out exactly how fucking stupid you really are.

Zardoz said:

I’m yet to meet an actuary that believes stats can mean anything.

As for a troll whom claims to despise feminism then proceeds to bash an MRG website for negative portrayal of women, and in the process of which clearly demonstrates an inability to comprehend generalised humour, I find myself having to declare a double bullshit on both T-Bag’s assertions of being anti-feminist and of male gender.
If I am incorrect, then I can only view this as meaning Britain is so deeply under the talons of feminism that their male children are being raised without appreciation of their own masculinity, and an indoctrinated impulse to defend the female gender regardless of the fact it strengthens feminist superiority in their laws and culture.

I am going to respond to all three comments at once
and I hate having to repeat myself but its unavoidable when dealing with people like you
Your stats are flawed because of the fact that there are more single mothers than single fathers. I thought you would have had the intelligence and mathematical skills to use ratio, to make the point slightly more reliable
My faith in american men has waned yet again, and I love the way that you couldn’t say anything about the fact that the majority of people held in prison and detention centers were male =)
This is essentialy how the conversation between me and doubt has been going like:

Me:…you see you can’t use the average as a reliable source when arguing an absoloutist point.
You: but look at these stats, its shows on average men can blah de blah
Me: ut I just said that the average can’t be used to argue an absolutist point as a single exception brings the argument crumbling down.
You: Look at these stats!
Me: But they’re based on the average and don’t take many things into consideration.
You: Look at these stats *insert any bad girly girl joke you can think of*
Me: but I just explained to you…
You: Look at these stats
Me: Do you have an extra chromosone?

This disapoints me on a leval you can not believe, feminists love this site as it essentialy proves the stereotype of men, this website is fuel for the feminist fire you self defeating morons. If you actually look at the averages on anything regarding this, woman do tend to excel, this is because mens results are all over the place, there are more mentally retarded men than women and there are more genius men than women, but unfortuantly these amazing people
Leonardo Da Vinci, Albert Einstein Etc.
These awesome men cannot drag the average up enough to compensate for mentally challenged men, so woman do appaear to be smarter, and women tend to be able to read from an earlier age.
Isn’t a bit humiliating to be defeated by your own argument?
I would assume so.
Why is it the worst examples of the male race that always feel the need to represent it? Doubt, you are quite literally an insult to mankind.

Now onto Manvoice.
Manvoice, you fail. There’s no way I could really put it simpler. I could go onto a witty insult on how your name ‘Man-voice’ is probably an insecurity of the fact that your testicles never dropped and you now sound like a chipmunk on helium
but I fear that’s not the reason
I fear it’s because you think you feel you have the right to be the ‘voice of men.’
But you don’t, sorry. My rants disproved your entire argument. I am starting to think that American men can write but not read.
Majority of stats can be twisted to mean anything, and the majority of stats are made up on the spot
because I really don’t know who thought up the ‘Men can read and write better than women’ because its proven that women are better readers and writers than men, but then again it is statistically proven that men tend to be better at maths
but you and your buddys completly disproved that with your inability to comprehend the method of ratio. Shame.

Now onto Zardoz, the one I hoped I could have had some form of mature debating with, but he dissapoints, just like he frequently dissapoints his wife whenever he cannot ‘rise to the occasion’, oh what am I talking about, you don’t trust anyones gender, you probably think your wife was a puerto rican man named Bubba who had a sex change.
Oh, I’m also wrong again, you don’t believe in any form of feminism

You: ‘We are going to McDonalds’
Your wife: ‘I’d quite like to stay in tonight actually’
You: ‘SHUT UP BITCH! I thought you would have learned by now that I feel woman shouldn’t have a say in any matter’

My opinion : Modern day feminism = Bad
Useful old feminism= Good

but you wouldn’t comprehend that.
Just like you don’t comprehend ‘funny’
I’m sorry, but I love generalised humor, but I only like funny generalised humor, Dick’s jokes are the type for pre-pubescant boys who think girls have the ‘cooties’
Dick is a poor mans Maddox.

You can ‘declare’ all you want, but it’s not going to get you very far
and I don’t see why you keep on calling me a woman as I disagree with your point
That’s like calling a black guy getting called white over the internet because he doesn’t speak ’street’.
and if I were a woman
how would that be bad for me?
Your getting thrashed by a race you claim to have superitority over.
That’s like an olympically trained runner losing a race to a fat man in a wheel chair in your mindset.

I love the way you accuse my culture of being feminist.
America has San Fransisco and invented feminism
Northern Ireland invented manly.
Ow, your country created the very thing you hate.

So I’m brainwashed to defend a woman? I haven’t defended a woman as of yet, I have just been ripping the piss out of you and all your friends for being idiots, believe me, if a women came on here and started claiming superitority, I would argue with her as well, same with a man and this is how this situation arose.
I appreciate my masculinity and I am not indoctrinated.
I just like to put idiots back in their place is all. I hold a door open for men and women alike.

God.
This is like playing chess with a blind man.
Its easy, but it’s tough to convince him he’s lost.

Zardoz said:

I’m yet to meet an actuary that believes stats can mean anything.

As for a troll whom claims to despise feminism then proceeds to bash an MRG website for negative portrayal of women,

Contrary to popular belief, you can be against feminism and not hate women. A concept the men on here can’t seem to grasp.
Feminism in this day and age is outdated and unnecessary, so it is pointless and sexist. This site is sexist. So I’m guessing T-Bag is against sexism/discrimination in general.

I think i’ll respond to all three of your comments here
all right
I shall explain
yet again.
1: That stat about men being better parents based on those stats would be a lot more reliable using ratio, seeing as there is a considerable amount less of male parents for female parents. It dissapoints me that your amazing male brain didn’t notice that.
Why is it always the worst examples of the male race that feel the need to represent the rest of us? You’se and Dick are essentialy proving the feminist arguments that men only care about sex, why do you have the suck so much? This website is fuelling the feminist fire.
You ignored several things in my little rants that you don’t seem to understand
You are constantly using the average.
The average is a very bad thing to use when arguing an absoloutist point, as all it takes is one example to bring it crumbling down.
You also ignored the fact that the majority of the people in the Jails and detention centers are male.
This is essentialy how this argument has been going Doubt:

Me: Well you see, the average is flawed in arguing an absolutist point (shows example)
You: Look at the stats.
Me: Aye, so what?’
You: It says on average that men are better at blah-de-blah
Me: …but I just explained to you why that argument is flawed, l explain again *explains again*
You: Look at the stats.
Me: I have but like, I just told you why that is flawed
You: Look at these stats *shows more stats based on average*
Me: Look, I know that, but that doesn’t work in arguing an absolutist point *explains again*
You: Your maths are flawed, look at these stats *puts some sort of girly girl insults forward*
Me: Do you have an extra chromosone?

2: Mansvoice, you really need to y’know, become more sensible
statistics areally can be twisted to show anything, and even though there is a fair amount of stats saying that men are better than woman, there are just as many saying that women are better than men. Women do learn to read and write faster than men, save some some form of retardation, that is usually the case
you do get some male prodigys, like Leonardo Da Vinci, Einstein Etc.
but mens results are over the place, there is more mental retardation in males than in females, but there is also more geniuses in male
but using the average
Women are better than men
I personally detest that idea, but using your ‘immaculate and incontradicatble; argument of the average, its true
nice goign retards
using your amazing argument you just lost your battle
and there is more illiterate men than women.
So I will put this plain and simple to you
as I think you’se are american after all
and years of incest does make your mind think crazy thoughts.

Ignoring my points does not mean they do not exist.
No one is equal.
You cannot argue an absolutist point by only using averages and insults about gender.
You really need to get out more and meet a nice girl, and stop watching MTV.

Now this is to Zardoz, you I thought I was going to have an actual mature deabte with, but he failed as well. I should learn not to call peoples bluffs when im sure they can’t deliver, just like your wife should learn that she shouldn’t expect you to ‘rise to the occasion’
oh
but you wouldn’t have a wife, seeing as you hate the feminist movement

‘We are going to McDonalds.’
‘Can’t we just eat in?’
‘SHUT UP BITCH! I thought you would have learned right now that woman having any form of power is a bad thing!’

My opinion is: modern feminism bad, the important feminism good.
but seeing as you are like all the other idiots on here, you will probably ignore that, shame really.

generalised humor is awesome, but like
Dick’s?
Humor is supposed to be funny Zardoz.
Dick’s humor is like, well it’s a bit like maddox except not funny, and he believes it.

You can declare all you want but like, it’s not going to get you very far now is it?
If I were a girl, how would take away from my argument
it would actually add to my argument
y’know, being completly thrashed to pieces by someone in a gender you claim to have superiority over.
From your perspective, isn’t that a bit like an olympic runner being beaten badly by a guy with no legs?
Ouch…

Your from america, you have san fransisco, you can never be ‘manly’, you invented feminism.
I am from northern ireland, we invented manly.
but now I can be expected
by your amazing sense of wit
to be called a leprechaun princess
but thats like calling a black man ‘wonderbread’

This is like playing chess with a blind man
It’s easy, but its tough to convince him he’s lost.

I’m yet to meet an actuary that believes stats can mean anything.

As for a troll whom claims to despise feminism then proceeds to bash an MRG website for negative portrayal of women, and in the process of which clearly demonstrates an inability to comprehend generalised humour, I find myself having to declare a double bullshit on both T-Bag’s assertions of being anti-feminist and of male gender.
If I am incorrect, then I can only view this as meaning Britain is so deeply under the talons of feminism that their male children are being raised without appreciation of their own masculinity, and an indoctrinated impulse to defend the female gender regardless of the fact it strengthens feminist superiority in their laws and culture.

stats can mean anything

Apparently, they *show* that Men > women. They can also mean that “women suck” etc etc but to twist it to say that stats can mean anything shows how fucktarded you are T-bag. Fuck off.

http://christianparty.net/sfh.htm

Princess, scroll to the very bottom of this page. Just read the chart on the end. What do you see?
And you wasted all of that time making a fool about yourself.
Simply put, if the divorce courts favored men as the primary caregivers, society as a whole would be better off. Seeing as how people like you have trouble applying logic and reason to a situation, I’m afraid that’s how things will have to turn out.

T-bagged, mathematically you are wrong again. Yet this little bitch keeps nagging and nagging and grasping, she can not allay her furious hatred for the men that provide for her and protect her for one second to look around and see the logical, plausible answer. What a stupid, cockmongling whore.
You’ll soon be a lonesome 30-something crying about where the good ones went (uh, away from you, no-fucking-shit) and why men will no longer settle for your ’shapely’ body. Perhaps if your body was not the only thing you had you may not have so bleak a future, but alas, you are too stupid to even begin to comprehend the past or present. I imagine her future involves some rich man feeding her bonbons and expecting absolutely nothing in return.
To help you out, honeybuns, here is why a child raised by a father would be better off than one raised by both people:
Western girls are whores.
http://encyclopediadramatica.com/images/f/f5/Stupidandfat.jpg

Doubt said:

Wait, wait a second. I looked back on what I cited and look at this - a child raised by your boyfriend will actually be LESS likely to end up in prison than if you had to step in. See, that’s the world we live in - a world filled with ungrateful whores like you who think that if you ‘tried your best’ it somehow makes you equal or superior to me.

“Why does David Burgess believe this? Carefully consider what the
above statistics mean. An average of 4% of our nation’s children grew
up in single-father households, an average of 30% grew up in
single-mother households, and an average of 60% grew up in
two-parent families, with the remaining 6% growing up with
grandparents, foster homes, uncles and aunts, etc. Children from
single-father households are under-represented in juvenile prisons by 4
times, and children from two-parent families are under-represented by
3 times–BUT children from single-mother households are
OVER-represented by TWO AND ONE HALF TIMES (2 1/2 x). ”
- http://christianparty.net/sfh.htm
“Juveniles committed to juvenile prisons (Texas):
Less than 1% are from single father homes
20% are from 2-parent homes
79% are from fatherless homes”

Hm.
You don’t seem to understand the flaws of your mathematics
so I will explain, in a relativly patronising way:
I have 4 apple trees, and 25 of those apples turn bad.
My Friend, Greg, has 20 apple trees and and 75 apples turn bad
We send them to a place for bad apples.
My apples take up a quarter of the space, and my friends Gregs apple take up three quarters.
Using your theorey, my friend Greg is a worse apple grower than me.
We will ignore the fact, and there is a possibilty, that I gave him, against his will, some of those apple trees, and I planted them in bad areas so the trees couldn’t get enough nutrients for them to turn them into good apples.

You see, the thing about statistics is that the majority of them can be twisted to mean anything
99% of serial killers have eaten bread, therefore bread turns you into a serial killer.
and as for those wonderous little stats you gave me, about the children going to jail, how many of those children were male?

You said ‘our nation’
I have only ever heard americans use that phrase, and as seeing as you quoted the stats for texas’ juvenile prisons, i will assume your american.
That means you ignored me saying that I lived in the UK, but it’s okay, I can understand that ‘your nation’ is going to shit, and your government isn’t exactly the best for childcare.
But I am pretty sure that Dick got most of his opinions of women by watching MTV’s sweet sixteen on repeat, I admit that your nations girls (and boys for that matter) aren’t the brightest
and you can call them sluts and all you want
but the fact is
If you say that they can’t tie their shoelaces, but they are smart enough to marry a rich old billionaire and screw him for a while and when he dies gets all of their money, you may say that she is a stupid whore, but she managed to become a billionaire with no hard work and a measly IQ, somthing you could never hope to achieve.
and you may be like ‘But she is a whore’, well so are you when you suck up to your boss, the only thing is, her rewards are greater. I just think Dick and all are just pissed off because they get manipulated by women with less brains than a red blood cell.

but that only happens in America really, I mean, you are the stupidest and fattest country in the world, I don’t blame you, I mean you have got to take our your frustration (sexual, personal and professional) out on something.

Don’t even try and argue an absoloutist point, as all it takes is one exception to bring it crumbling down.
This website should be changed to
‘Some men are better than some women.’
and whenever you find your holy grail of an argument, an irrefutable piece of evidence that ALL men are better than ALL women at something, then the name should be changed too:
‘Some men are better than some women, except for (blank) in which men totally dominate)’

http://denisdutton.com/baumeister.htm
=)

Zardoz said:

I see T-Bag has mostly ceased posting their delight in homoerotica, and moved onto debating with fallacious logic and character assaults in an attempt to appear intelligent. Thus far, about the only intelligent thing s/he has contributed was this gem:

T-bag said:Nobody is equal and no one race is greater than the other.

As for declarations of being a man, I dispute that on the grounds that the fallacious manner in which they form arguments, twist facts, cast aspersions regarding sexuality (which is extremely amusing considering the amount of gay images s/he shared with us at the onset of their posting), then shut the fuck up when statistics were cited which clearly took into account ratios of representation, I would say that T-Bag was rather feminist-womanish. Which is to say they argue in very much the same manner as many other feminist trolls have done here. Since their gender is openly disputed, I shall henceforth refer to them as “it”.

I personally am not against women, only the feminist movement. If women wish to support feminism for selfish gains, then they are a feminist and as a result I am against them on the grounds of the feminist agenda they wish to propagate. If they support feminism for reasons of having been brainwashed during their scholastic indoctrination, then I will try to assist in helping them to see reality. If they are prepared to debate on rational terms. When they choose rather to do nothing but sling insults, in a tirade of indignation that men actually dare to have such a website as this, then I may join in the insult game purely for entertainment.
Forum trolls are like feminism-empowered slatterns. Use them once or twice, then ignore their calls and messages. Eventually they just go away and leave you to conduct business in peace.

@Doubt: don’t let this freak twist your words into its own version of what you said any more. In fact, I wouldn’t even bother arguing with it. Its “arguments” are not arguments, as there is no logical validity in misrepresentation (in this case twisting your words into something easier to argue against or insult), nor is there even the remotest form of validity in using insults as argument. Many forum trolls don’t even buy into the shit they spiel anyhow, they just post in order to get a reaction for their own perverted pleasure. Every time you reply to such a troll, with statistical fact, insult, or anger, they just lean closer into the monitor and manipulate themselves faster at having gained attention. As RobC has pointed out, far better to just talk about them than directly to them. Better still to just ignore them altogether.

I hate feminism as well, it is basically the female version of this. The idea of a superiority of a race is flawed.
I will ignore the insults and jibes as you actually are sensiblem, I detest feminism to a point which is unbelivable, I mean like
how do they expect us to stop certain men from being retarded sexual harrasers?
We can’t, but they blame the whole male race for this.
A lot like this website, but still, feminism is for man beasts and lesbians, this website is for men who don’t have the balls too handle rejection.
God I hate feminism, and I hate chauvinism which doesn’t make good points, like Dick.

and also to your point about talking about them rather than too them
That is called bitching, and that is very, very womanly. Shame.

and I actually would prefer that you referred to ‘them’ as it, but it really doesn’t matter. does it? I mean like, even if I was a girl, which I can assure I am not, it wouldn’t take anything away from my argument.
I don’t get pleasure from attention by the way, I get pleasure by correcting idiots. Sadism is awesome. and this is the first ‘forum’ I have ever been on, so i wouldnt call me a forum troll as of yet =)
I am prepared to debate on rational terms. Go for it.

I see T-Bag has mostly ceased posting their delight in homoerotica, and moved onto debating with fallacious logic and character assaults in an attempt to appear intelligent. Thus far, about the only intelligent thing s/he has contributed was this gem:

T-bag said:Nobody is equal and no one race is greater than the other.

As for declarations of being a man, I dispute that on the grounds that the fallacious manner in which they form arguments, twist facts, cast aspersions regarding sexuality (which is extremely amusing considering the amount of gay images s/he shared with us at the onset of their posting), then shut the fuck up when statistics were cited which clearly took into account ratios of representation, I would say that T-Bag was rather feminist-womanish. Which is to say they argue in very much the same manner as many other feminist trolls have done here. Since their gender is openly disputed, I shall henceforth refer to them as “it”.

I personally am not against women, only the feminist movement. If women wish to support feminism for selfish gains, then they are a feminist and as a result I am against them on the grounds of the feminist agenda they wish to propagate. If they support feminism for reasons of having been brainwashed during their scholastic indoctrination, then I will try to assist in helping them to see reality. If they are prepared to debate on rational terms. When they choose rather to do nothing but sling insults, in a tirade of indignation that men actually dare to have such a website as this, then I may join in the insult game purely for entertainment.
Forum trolls are like feminism-empowered slatterns. Use them once or twice, then ignore their calls and messages. Eventually they just go away and leave you to conduct business in peace.

@Doubt: don’t let this freak twist your words into its own version of what you said any more. In fact, I wouldn’t even bother arguing with it. Its “arguments” are not arguments, as there is no logical validity in misrepresentation (in this case twisting your words into something easier to argue against or insult), nor is there even the remotest form of validity in using insults as argument. Many forum trolls don’t even buy into the shit they spiel anyhow, they just post in order to get a reaction for their own perverted pleasure. Every time you reply to such a troll, with statistical fact, insult, or anger, they just lean closer into the monitor and manipulate themselves faster at having gained attention. As RobC has pointed out, far better to just talk about them than directly to them. Better still to just ignore them altogether.

T-bag, you just impersonated a man on the internet and girly-girls are well known for their sexual insecurity. You really shouldn’t be calling me a homosexual, especially if I do not need to validate my life in every post I make. Look at the numbers and explain to me the most likely explaination, not the one you wish were true. Perhaps these pictures will help if you happen to be one of those illiterates:
http://bp3.blogger.com/_c3HoRwOqXpE/Rs0GatGyapI/AAAAAAAAADg/jZCx9LZcJT M/s1600-h/BadMomCompilation.jpg

Wait, wait a second. I looked back on what I cited and look at this - a child raised by your boyfriend will actually be LESS likely to end up in prison than if you had to step in. See, that’s the world we live in - a world filled with ungrateful whores like you who think that if you ‘tried your best’ it somehow makes you equal or superior to me.

“Why does David Burgess believe this? Carefully consider what the
above statistics mean. An average of 4% of our nation’s children grew
up in single-father households, an average of 30% grew up in
single-mother households, and an average of 60% grew up in
two-parent families, with the remaining 6% growing up with
grandparents, foster homes, uncles and aunts, etc. Children from
single-father households are under-represented in juvenile prisons by 4
times, and children from two-parent families are under-represented by
3 times–BUT children from single-mother households are
OVER-represented by TWO AND ONE HALF TIMES (2 1/2 x). ”
- http://christianparty.net/sfh.htm
“Juveniles committed to juvenile prisons (Texas):
Less than 1% are from single father homes
20% are from 2-parent homes
79% are from fatherless homes”