Men Are Eco-friendlier
It should be no surprise to men that women care as much about the environment as they care about anything else — including embarrassing themselves.
They don’t care about it at all.
Sure, when you think of the term “Eco-friendly” you might think of a bunch of obnoxious women braying on endlessly with vaguely communist catch phrases that they could never possibly understand.
Do your part.
But you also might think of how cool the old McDonald’s wrappers used to be before a man in charge changed them from Styrofoam to 100% recycled paper.
Guess which one of these actually helped the problem.
Women are all talk and a bunch of blowhards. Every man knows this is true because every man knows that they respond incredibly well to the exact same kind of shit. That’s because when you’re pretending to be a pompous arrogant ass, you’re speaking a language that women can understand. It’s like barking at a dog. You don’t know what you’re saying, but the dog will bark back sometimes.
The only thing that’s important is your conviction and your volume: as hard and loud as possible. Women take stances on all issues in exactly the same way: hard and loud but with no substance at all — and while whoring for the media as much as possible. Something else they’re great at. Whoring.
Animal and human rights? No. Women don’t actually give a shit about that. The very same women will show up at a protest or comfortably eat a hamburger wearing leather from every part of the world and adorned with gems and metals mined by children.
The environment? Nope. Don’t think so. For every one Double Quarter Pounder wrapper that a man recycles, a woman will have released about a cubic yard of aerosol propellant into the atmosphere and have had a small hand in torturing like a dozen bunnies and orangutans.
Women’s rights? Yea right. I just made myself spit Coke all over my keyboard even suggesting that women care about women’s rights. If women cared about women’s rights so much, then they would learn to keep their mouths shut when they’re in so far over their heads that they can’t even see the surface.
Men have been doing that for years. That’s why we don’t sound like a bunch of pompous jackasses, ever.
Related Articles:
June 20th, 2005 at 2:03 pm - IP Man-Hash: cc0d45fa29251
A round of applause for ya, Dick
June 20th, 2005 at 2:50 pm - IP Man-Hash: 90732515db7b8
Yes, I always protest for animal rights eating meat, wearing leather. Must you generalise everyone? I have been a vegetarian since I was 10 (nor have I worn leather, silk or suede) can you say the same Dick?
Aerosol cans no longer have CFCs in them (well they’ve been banned in Britain, I’m not sure about anywhere else [Dear Lord I'll be ashamed if you're British, though this would be unlikely as I think you'd have had a severe kicking by now]) so my underarm deodrant doesn’t cause a build up of greenhouse gases.
Can you get out of your own arse now Dick? Your view is rather restricted and contorted!
June 20th, 2005 at 3:00 pm - IP Man-Hash: fa2367636fcfb
W-Hortencia Dick is a little boy trying to play big it’s fun though to play and pretend what he says is true. Dick is really an idiot a severe idiot. Man Dick I shake my head and feel so sorry for you. I hope your just doing this for fun and don’t really take yourself seriously.
June 20th, 2005 at 3:01 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
So you’re a vegan-lesbian who wears only hemp, doesn’t use deodorant, and hasn’t changed her view of the world since she was 10?
Someone call the cliché police.
-Dick
June 20th, 2005 at 3:06 pm - IP Man-Hash: fa2367636fcfb
Duhhhhhhhhhh no Dick that just means she was a lot more sound mind at 10 than most men are at 60. I guess your perfect. I know your scared dick it’s o.k. maybe they will start selling confidance soon.
June 20th, 2005 at 3:08 pm - IP Man-Hash: 90732515db7b8
I’m not vegan, I’m vegetarian who doesn’t use the products of animals that have been killed. I do use deodrant, I was merely stating that deodrant no longer contains greenhouse gases. I was a quick learner, I have merely strengthened my opinions. At least my views have changed since the Edwardian period anyway, you damn hypocrit!
June 20th, 2005 at 3:22 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
They’ve been selling confidence for years.
Buy it Now!
-Dick
June 20th, 2005 at 3:24 pm - IP Man-Hash: fa2367636fcfb
Dick I really think you should change your website to Boys are Better than Girls and they also have cooties. Its also funny little Dick that as such a superior being you would have to sit and argue with Nicole who is only 16 that must mean she’s right around your age.
June 20th, 2005 at 3:43 pm - IP Man-Hash: 198450b4642a5
Im American so I hope Dick isnt british either, because I hope a mind as brilliant as Dick’s would come from American soil. If you ladies have any more questions about the enviornment, why don’t you ask a MAN named Gaylord Nelson. If you dont know who he is, look him up.
June 21st, 2005 at 6:57 am - IP Man-Hash: 0eb4d0ea7a822
Christ almighty, Dick Masterson & Co
are you a bunch of repressed poofs or what?
June 21st, 2005 at 7:06 am - IP Man-Hash: 2df095214c68e
Your mama said- W-Hortencia Dick is a little boy trying to play big it’s fun though to play and pretend what he says is true. Dick is really an idiot a severe idiot. Man Dick I shake my head and feel so sorry for you. I hope your just doing this for fun and don’t really take yourself seriously.
Wrong. W-Hortencia = female. Though the second part of your post is accurate though.
June 21st, 2005 at 10:23 am - IP Man-Hash: 26390a6c57528
Charli-Dragon=female who skipped school today! Tut tut, a bloke would never do such a thing! The ‘A’ at the end of W-Hortencia would suggest feminity in most European languages, as an ‘O’ would suggest masculinity. But I’m stupid (because I’m female) and so don’t know this.
June 21st, 2005 at 10:44 am - IP Man-Hash: 26390a6c57528
I also have to say, I’m really glad that Jeff isn’t tarnishing the name of British gentlemen. I don’t mind that the majority of the sexists idiots on this site come from the country that re-elected George W Bush jnr! It makes me feel more confident in my own country.
But Oh My God! I know who George W Bush is! As a women how could I possibly know this? What with me never reading the newspapers, watching the news or newsnight. Maybe I’m psychic?
June 21st, 2005 at 11:40 am - IP Man-Hash: 20032332fa185
I happened upon this blog whilst taking a break from the strenuous daily activity required of men (and shunned by women), and I must say that it is refreshing to have found a place where the inherent superiority of men is both recognised and exalted.
I did note with considerable distress that notwithstanding your unambiguous instructions to the contrary, certain women (as well as men-who-would-be-women) have taken it upon themselves to intrude upon the intellectual sanctuary of this place. It is telling, isn’t it: You seek to speak truth, and they cannot bear its light. They tremble at its inevitability and certitude, like unwashed savages who have angered their gods.
Yet unlike those same savages, who at least have the sense to offer up some meager sacrifice in propitiation for their wrongdoing, the most these women and womanly-men can do is whine, and pick, and nag, and bray their nonsense about “men’s insensitivity” and other fiddle-faddle.
Hurrah for you, Dick Masterson; hurrah indeed, I say. I shall return.
June 21st, 2005 at 12:02 pm - IP Man-Hash: fa2367636fcfb
Manley you sound more gayly than anything your words are funny because your trying way to hard. You and Dick should get along really well.
June 21st, 2005 at 12:19 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
Manly,
Good to have you around.
I want to get a few more men’s opinions on having a separate Earth Day just for men. So a difference can actually be made.
Just like the feminist movement, women have turned the real Earth Day into a complete joke.
How about Man Earth Day?
Any thoughts are welcome.
-Dick
June 21st, 2005 at 12:25 pm - IP Man-Hash: 20032332fa185
your mama - I know big words are difficult for women, sweetheart; that is why men invented dictionaries. The unspoken premise of the things, unfortunately, is that women could actually be bothered to crack one open - not bloody likely, in my experience; it’s too much like work.
June 21st, 2005 at 12:36 pm - IP Man-Hash: 20032332fa185
Dick-
While the concept of a Men’s Earth Day is appealing, I believe it would ultimately be a zero-sum game. Here’s my reasoning: If we men were to dedicate a day each year to cleaning up the mess that women have made of the earth, we would be out of the house on those days. As the women would then have no one at home to nag, pester, and whine at, they would spend that day doing the only other thing they are proficient at: “getting ready to go out”; i.e., dumping additional pollutants onto or into the air, water and ground. One thing is certain: women can pollute much more quickly than men can clean up after them.
So your idea, while laudable, probably would lack any long term beneficial effects. That’s just my gut reaction, though.
June 21st, 2005 at 12:38 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
Manley, that’s a great point. Women certainly do not ever use a dictionary.
Some of the way they use words that have definite concrete meanings are just hilarious.
Women have the audacity of believing that words should mean what they want them to mean at any given time — and not what the words actually mean.
This deserves more exploration.
-Dick
June 21st, 2005 at 12:54 pm - IP Man-Hash: 20032332fa185
Dick- Your observation about how women use words is spot on. My own theory is that this permits women to convince themselves that they have “won an argument with a man” at least some of the time, the idea being that it’s better to make up a new language (using words that sound like English ones) than be reduced to tears yet again.
June 21st, 2005 at 2:25 pm - IP Man-Hash: c9adc407188f8
“cleaning up the mess that women have made of the earth” What kind of monstrous joke. You brag about all these great things men have invented, and let me give you a little hint here ,women (may have contributed to) were not the main inventors of burning fossil fuels which caused global warming.
You are complete fair-weather men, you brag about your genders achievements and inventions but as soon as anything negative is created by your gender you look the other way (women didn’t invent the atomic bomb, start world wars, blow up twin towers or go on crusades).
Women are by no means perfect, but neither are men. We are all human and we all make mistakes. You need to get over the fact that your gender isn’t perfect.
June 21st, 2005 at 2:28 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
Well, it looks like Vagina Steve is back.
“James”, you’re obviously a woman.
Men don’t use parentheses. They sicken us.
-Dick
June 21st, 2005 at 4:10 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7e677ff09fc5f
James, of course women didn’t go on crusades, you moron. Well, I’m sure some did, but not to do the actual crusading stuff, more likely to make the most of a market for blowjobs and exotic fabrics etc.
They didn’t go crusading because that particular enterprise was to liberate half the known world from the backward dumb superstition of Islam and to most women there’s nothing whatsoever wrong with backward dumb superstition–they admire feminists, after all.
June 21st, 2005 at 4:14 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7e677ff09fc5f
As for women not being the “main” invenors of fossil fuels–you mean they were the minor inventors?
Sure enough happy to use fossil fuels though, aren’t they? Whether to gather some twigs together to light a fire or to drive 630 miles to a tupperware party while the dishwasher thrashes away using a gigawatt or two of electricity generated in some coal-fired power station.
Jeez, either get a pair or defend women intelligently.
June 21st, 2005 at 4:31 pm - IP Man-Hash: a94a238fe564c
“James” - “women (may have contributed to) were not the main inventors of burning fossil fuels which caused global warming.”
But of course, honey. Women didn’t contribute to the development of internal combustion engines because the abstractions necessary to develop such a device were beyond the capacity of the female mind. I’d be willing to bet a considerable sum, though, that you don’t walk everywhere - i.e., while you whine about male superiority, you are perfectly willing to accept its fruits.
Let me tell you what women DID invent, though: the fallacy of “global warming.” It has no basis in scientific fact - the stuff by which men make decisions about reality. It is a “theory” which achieved prominence entirely by hysteria. You may want to research the etymology of “hysteria” if you doubt that women were responsible.
June 21st, 2005 at 4:45 pm - IP Man-Hash: 22c56efac587a
Listen to the whiny little bitches. ‘It’s not fair, oppression, fascist etc’. Women have an opinion, I agree, and it should be along the lines of ‘Yes honey, you are right, yet again’.
Equal rights for women don’t just include equal pay. It would also mean eual WORK, and there ain’t too many women around as good as the most useless man.
June 21st, 2005 at 7:11 pm - IP Man-Hash: 770ef9ea45010
Keith says: They didn’t go crusading because that particular enterprise was to liberate half the known world from the backward dumb superstition of Islam and to most women there’s nothing whatsoever wrong with backward dumb superstition–they admire feminists, after all.
The backwards, dumb superstition that teaches that women are property, and inequal to men? That backwards, dumb superstition? Yes, by all means, “liberate” people from Islam, Keith. Way to be a closet feminist there.
June 21st, 2005 at 7:40 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4966131dbe282
HA!! This has to be the funniest thing I’ve ever seen since….well, ever! I can’t believe you all are serious about this. I’m sorry, but this site is stupid, and this is a guy saying it. A straight, normal, average guy.
First, we need to think of this genetically. Females differ from males in ONE chromosome. ONE. Otherwise? Eh, hair color, eye color, the works, but everyone in the world is 99.9% the same in their genetic formulas. And yet you persist in saying this tiny tiny percentage that differs makes men superior to women? Very funny. You must’ve failed biology in school.
Next, let’s think of this in physical way. It is true men are usually stronger than women, and women tend to be more flexible than men. Wow I’m so amazed, that MUST mean men are better. Wrong. We’re all equal, and I’m not saying that because it sounds right. 50% of the population consists of women! Also, what the HELL are you talking about, men are smarter than women?? What, because men have suppressed women for hundreds upon hundreds of years, allowed very low education, and barely allowed women to speak until recently means we’re better? No, it means we’re power-hungry. We control them because that’s what they were taught, not because they’re dumb. I know for a matter of fact they aren’t, and they’re probably smarter than most of the feminists here, I’m sorry to say.
In conclusion, all you feminists need to get a life and open your eyes. Who makes a web site called “menarebetterthanwomen.com”? An old man with the maturity of a 6 year old apparently. And who actually supports this? I shiver at the thought. I’d sooner support a woman then any of you dumb-ass feminists, I can tell you that .This is so sad. But thanks for the laugh! Glad to get that all out. ;)
And on another note, men do use parentheses. They are so we obviously more-intelligent beings, that is, us non-feminists, can please you inept, dogmatic, ignorant fools to the best of our extent. I see now that isn’t possible.
June 21st, 2005 at 8:09 pm - IP Man-Hash: a94a238fe564c
Weeble - “It is true men are usually stronger than women . . . that MUST mean men are better.”
While your point is certainly true, it’s only part of the story. Men are also more intelligent, more able to abstract, better at mathematics, languages . . . the list goes on and on, and includes everything except “bearing offspring,” to which undertaking we all understand the male is indispensible. The physical strength difference is just icing on the cake, though thank you for pointing it out.
June 21st, 2005 at 8:18 pm - IP Man-Hash: cc0d45fa29251
Weeble- I surely hope you don’t consider yourself a true man, not after all that anti-male hate speech you’ve polluted this sanctuary with. You are the epitome of the pussification of modern man. By my calculations, you will indeed become a walking, talking pussy withign the next few years, hell maybe even the next few months. What’s important is that you do still have time to find your fuckign balls and return to the master race, The MAN race.
June 21st, 2005 at 8:35 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7e677ff09fc5f
Emrys, the treatment of women is only one aspect of Islam that makes it a backward, barbaric religion. Despising it no more makes me a closet feminist than regarding pussified men with contempt makes me anti-gonads.
ok?
June 22nd, 2005 at 1:15 am - IP Man-Hash: ac62c77584632
Weeble and Emrys raise some good if not slightly obtuse points about how men are better than women.
On some level we’re all just splitting hairs here. Whatever stance you may or may not claim to have on the issue, we can all agree on one thing: women are in no way as good as men at anything.
Now, I’ve certainly never said that women are stupid or weak, but when compared to men…come on, let’s be serious here.
In the end, why else would women need men to defend their rights with such manly ferocity.
-Dick
June 22nd, 2005 at 9:38 am - IP Man-Hash: 467fd5ac9e976
Dick: women are in no way as good as men at anything.
Um… Do you have statistic proof on that, or if this just your little ego trip?
Dick: Now, I’ve certainly never said that women are stupid or weak, but when compared to men…come on, let’s be serious here.
Er… You’re being too general… Not ALL men are better than women, and not ALL women are weaker than men… Let’s be serious here. I know men who can’t lift 50 lbs, and women who can lift twice the wieght of said man. I also noticed that there are very few men in the Gifted and Talented classes at my school. This isn’t saying women are better, I’m just saying you’re wrong.
June 24th, 2005 at 11:46 am - IP Man-Hash: 26390a6c57528
Women have to defend their rights with such ferocity because men like you persevere with oppressing women by saying it’s ‘fact’ with no logical argument or empirical evidence to prove your wild remarks!
June 24th, 2005 at 5:10 pm - IP Man-Hash: 7e677ff09fc5f
…” because men like you persevere with oppressing women by saying it’s ‘fact’…”
hmmmm…facts=oppression. Interesting theory. You could get a degree in postmodernist deconstructionist bullshit with that.
Or “Wimmins Studies”.
June 24th, 2005 at 8:36 pm - IP Man-Hash: b9ccf0bcef0c9
A woman demanding rights is like a fish demanding a bicycle.
Even if she gets what she wants, it’s useless.
June 25th, 2005 at 2:42 am - IP Man-Hash: c9adc407188f8
Blurting out a bunch of meaningless rubbish does not replace facts. On this entire website there is absolutely no factual evidence that men are superior of any kind.
Surely if men were so superior, there would be evidence.
June 25th, 2005 at 5:51 am - IP Man-Hash: 431e5b72d5dd7
I’m sorry, maybe it’s a little hard for you to comprehend. When I do: ‘this’ it means I am probably taking the piss. You say all these ‘facts’ however it is just bullshit opinion masquerading as fact.
June 27th, 2005 at 8:12 am - IP Man-Hash: c3fbaaa189425
in reply to “W-Hortencia” and the first post top of the page
Did you realise being a vegatarian actuerly kills more animals than a carnivor? when they are plowing your soy beans and other vegatainian substitutes, all those rabbits, and other small animals (its a few million a year) die from the harvesting. at least with meat eaters the animals are bread in farms, that way animals are replaced as fast as we eat them, and if we didnt eat meat, all the animals in the world would become extinct. I hate vegatarians (excluding the people who are doing it because of a health problem or have dietry needs). because we eat animals that we farm we save this world from colapsing in on itself from the masses of humans it holds, take away our farm bred cows, chickens, sheep, pigs and other animals and see how long this planet lasts.
oh and I cannot be bothered to go research this for you but i have done enough research myself to know this is true.
June 27th, 2005 at 8:41 am - IP Man-Hash: ac62c77584632
D&SSD,
I can’t remember the last time that I saw such a thorough and well-informed mode-ing.
Tremendous, man. Tremendously well done.
-Dick
June 27th, 2005 at 9:01 am - IP Man-Hash: c9adc407188f8
Drunken man you seem very judgemental of anyone with a conscience. People who are not vegetarians still eat vegetables (or at least they should) and so animals will always be killed due to farming. Not eating meat merely reduces the amount of animals killed.
And not all animals in farms are kept in good conditions, many people believe battery hens should no longer be allowed, I personally agree with them.
June 27th, 2005 at 1:23 pm - IP Man-Hash: c3fbaaa189425
I do realise this, but vegatarians cause EXTRA fields to be ploud for EXTRA food other than normal vegatables ie: Soy beans and I am not about to go off in a tangent of food and mention it all. but the amount of pretend meat products and other vegatables that I think taste foul (many have agreed with me) are therfore needing more vegtables to be harvested for people who choose to be vegatarian because they dont like animals being killed, hence killing more and not realising, alot of diets are taken on by women (and some men but mostly women) and I dont even need to look for data on this, I can tell you from the number of vegatarian men compared to vegatarian women I have known my whole life, I know off the top of my head 2 men that are veggies, 1 beacuse of a problem with meat, and the other because he doesnt like meat anymore, no reason, he just prefers to eat potato, fish and other stuff. infact fish wait a min, can u call that a veggie? oh well still i can name about 20 women from my head now that have been on and off meat or always off meat for the reason of killing animals or animal cruelty, fact still remains, those ‘poor’ animals are suporting the people who eat meat, if they didnt have them farmed we would all need to eat vegatables and would kill of all the animals faster than they can reproduce, at least the way we eat now with our system, we can farm animals fast enough with growth enhancers to sustain the billions of human life’s
And if thats the best responce you have Nicole then you suck more than the other women and the few men who suck up to you in here for telling me what is blatently obvious to us all. I just had to spell this too you again because you didnt pick up the obvious, i mean christ do meat eaters only have meat? i wouldnt of thought vegatables were eaten by us too, no i have steak thats it whats this thing u call vegatable? learn to read between the lines.
PS thankyou Dick, I am sure glad I am helping, maybe do consider the ‘Man world day’ because we could use it to help men who have fallen victem to womens evil charm? Hope you like the sudgestion.
June 27th, 2005 at 1:30 pm - IP Man-Hash: 2df095214c68e
Well now, DMA, I’m not on a ‘diet’ I have been vegetarian for many years now. And even if some animals do get caught up in farm machinary it is an unfortunate bi-prouct of overzealous farming methods used largely in the west. At leats that animal hasn”t spent it’s life in a tiny cage.
June 27th, 2005 at 7:00 pm - IP Man-Hash: b4de96109b641
Mr. Masterson:
>>Manley, that’s a great point. Women certainly do not ever use a dictionary.
Where did you get such a stupid idea? Did you even go to college? You probably don’t even know what a Lexicon even looks like, much less have opened one and actually used it. I own several, and use them quite often.
>>Some of the way they use words that have definite concrete meanings are just hilarious.
The same can be said of men.
>>Women have the audacity of believing that words should mean what they want them to mean at any given time — and not what the words actually mean.
Men think this way too. You have a very narrow-minded way of thinking. I am surprised you can survive in this world on such narrow views. You really are full of yourself.
June 27th, 2005 at 7:49 pm - IP Man-Hash: b9ccf0bcef0c9
DMA, that is a profound analysis. No woman could ever come up with such clear and well-supported reasoning.
June 27th, 2005 at 8:52 pm - IP Man-Hash: 868f03654397f
Being vegetarian is a choice people make for whatever reason - be it diet, moral conscience, religion, cost…whatever, that’s irrelevant.
I myself admire them, male or female, greatly for making a decision like that and sticking to it. Much of the food we eat now, and even the way our meals are designed, is based around the consumption is meat. Practical reasons alone make it difficult to be vegetarian, but when you add in other factors, it is very challenging.
June 27th, 2005 at 10:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: ac62c77584632
Megz, there are two types of people that no one gives a shit about who they admire: teenage girls and rapists.
-Dick
July 3rd, 2005 at 8:27 am - IP Man-Hash: c9adc407188f8
Yeah because everyone cares about what teensge boys think way more than teenage girls.
I know that no one gave a shit what I thought when I was a teenager.
July 3rd, 2005 at 11:20 am - IP Man-Hash: 2a3eaed8b56b0
Teenagers are all to often dismissed, and stereotyped because they don’t have voice enough to be taken sseriously. Dick you forgot paedophiles, con artists, serial killers, school caterers and just about anyone else. The world has become apathetic.
July 3rd, 2005 at 11:24 am - IP Man-Hash: ac62c77584632
Teenagers are overlooked because their opinions are completely invalid and based on hormones and gobbelty-gook.
-Dick
July 3rd, 2005 at 11:30 am - IP Man-Hash: 2a3eaed8b56b0
No ones opinion can be merely struck off so quickly. Some could say your opinions on women are tainted by the fact that you’re not getting any or of some childhood trauma or something. I may be hormonally charged but I know what I’m talking about, mostly.
July 9th, 2005 at 3:15 pm - IP Man-Hash: 35ddb97785cb3
To be honest I agree with Dick on this one, mostly… Most teenagers have completely invalid opinions and I don’t really like Ms. Hortentia’s attitude but some teenagers have intellects and opinions far beyond their years, in fact I am 16 and frequently discuss complex political issues with friends and we certainly have more opinions that are more sensible than the tories at the moment.
July 10th, 2005 at 11:23 am - IP Man-Hash: a71ce7daf1525
Everyone has more sensible opinions than the tories, except maybe the republicans! Most people do not like my attitude however my opinions are still valid. Age I have found has little bearing on one’s opinions on politics, ethics or much else. The majority of society has acquires their opinions from ridiculous tabloid newspapers, regardless of age. My group of friends who are all around 17 discuss many areas of politics, and the group is often fractured by each others views. However everyone has a valid opinion.
July 10th, 2005 at 6:02 pm - IP Man-Hash: 35ddb97785cb3
I beg to differ, age has a huge impact on ones politics, there is good evidence to suggest that the young tend to be more socialist in their views but as one ages, if one achieves then one becomes more right wing and capatalist. Of course everyone has the right to an opinion that is the beauty of a free society but that doesn’t mean to say that some opinions are just plain wrong. It’s not that I think you’re stupid but you are often too extreme and that frequently undermines what you are saying.
July 10th, 2005 at 7:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: e224f1f7216ad
Oh, jsut to get back to the vegetarian thing. I’m sorry to point this out but you are all complete morons.
Why? Well firstly someone said something about the biosphere collapsing if there were no cows or pigs. (or maintaining animals either way it’s stupid).
Firstly, do you realise that the amount of land needed to feed people with cows, compared with the amount of land needed to feed people with veggies is? Well maybe that’s a stupid question because you obviously don’t.
For every step up in the food chain 90% of the energy is lost due to respiration. So that means if a cow eats grass, only 10% of the mass of that grass actually gets made into cow mass. That means that a field of cows provides 1/10th of the energy of a field of wheat.
I.E you need much more land to feed people with cows rather than wheat.
What does that mean? You destroy habitat with the fields used to grow food for the cows.
What does that mean? More species die due to the reduced habitat.
I hope I have educated you DMA, if you doubt my word then look it up in any biology textbook.
Oh and the whole point about genetic similarity? A Chimpanzees’ genes are 99% percent the same as a humans. So in theory even a tiny amount of difference in genes can make a huge difference. This doesn’t prove the point that woman are inferior - just different. Besides, as demonstarted by young Dick here, superiority is only determined by the person esposing said view. After all, a chimpanzee might see us humans as being inferior.
If you really want to get into this further then just take the past (and present in some places) view that negroes are stupid. Well it turns out that they aren’t, and there is no scientific evidence to support that.
May 8th, 2007 at 9:01 pm - IP Man-Hash: 926a1904cecf2
There are articles and links to scientific studies all over the place on this website, twat.
July 3rd, 2007 at 5:04 pm - IP Man-Hash: ce5c278b20e99
thank you max for just about the only intelligent comment on this post. it’s a no brainer that of course it is better for the environment. one more thing for seriously drunk to ponder, if he sobers up long enough to do that.
back to drunk & serious’ initial comment concerning the mice being plowed under the fields by the blades of tractors verse the factory farmed cows being slaughtered & consumed in huge quantities by peeps like himself… well, i’d rather be a mouse living a free life in the corn patch and meeting my end with a huge blade one fateful day that being sequestered in a pen so small i can’t turnaround… and being fed food that’s not even native to my bovine system… and then meeting with a certain death with no chance of escape. which would you rather be? the cow or the mouse?
even you, seriously drunk, must agree with me on this. freedom trumps everything… and speaking of our hard won constitutional right, happy 4th of july america!
July 3rd, 2007 at 10:54 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Of mice and men… and cows.
Native to your bovine system, you say?
July 4th, 2007 at 7:20 am - IP Man-Hash: 51f86d6005c2d
Too bad humans can’t digest grass, huh?
July 4th, 2007 at 7:58 am - IP Man-Hash: 4555637db20cf
Excellent point there, Risk.
December 7th, 2007 at 6:50 pm - IP Man-Hash: e24370fe2bb3c
I do my part for the enviroment.
I recycle, I have signed dozens of petitions for the earth, I restrain from buying anything that is dangerous to the enviroment, I mean I don’t buy products tested on animals.
So you can’t say that women aren’t eco-friendly, because some women are, just as some men are.
December 31st, 2007 at 3:12 am - IP Man-Hash: 4eaf17bb5a4b6
Irony.
December 31st, 2007 at 3:56 am - IP Man-Hash: 60c984a618a05
Ha ha ha ha ha!
What a stupid little whore! Signing petitions for vague things you hardly worry your pretty little head over? And not buying products tested on animals - well, it’s not like the amount of le