Every Woman is a Cheating Whore

Oh yes, that’s right. That’s what I said. And I said it because it’s true. All women are cheaters.

I don’t mean this to be a provocateur or to prance around in the realm of the hypothetical like some kind of dandy. I mean, flat out, that every woman in the world is a cheater, has cheated, and is probably cheating at this very moment.

Getting a woman to cheat on her husband or significant other is not like getting a woman to go to the gym — by heaping shitloads of gifts and attention on her like a spoilt child and then ultimately getting no burn for your earn. Getting a woman to cheat is like getting a duck to eat bread crumbs or a rat to eat rubbish. All you have to do is toss it in front of their face.

It’s not a hard conclusion to draw, so let’s just look at the facts. Getting attention from men is a woman’s lifeblood. That’s why women worship men in the form of menial tasks that they’re not very good at — because men control our attention like the gods of old controlled the sun and the crypt. We giveth and we can taketh away.

Good attention, bad attention, the worst kind of attention; it doesn’t matter. To a woman, being in a Girls Gone Wild video is just as laudable as serving in a highly respected public office. They stack up eyeballs like empty pie plates at a NOW convention.

So let’s compare: a woman’s lust for attention versus a man’s desire to consume or waste things — something very manly indeed. Take throwing a sandwich in the street for example. Do you know what’s better than throwing a sandwich in the street? That’s right, throwing two sandwiches in the street. Now what if that sandwich cost twice as much as the first? What if you had to wait in line again to get it? I would probably still do it and I’m betting that most men would. But what if dealing with two sandwiches cost you your dignity, your job, and your soul?

Women, of course, have none of those things — or at least don’t have 2 out of 3. That’s why when we change ’sandwiches’ to ‘men’ and ‘throwing them in the street’ to ‘getting any kind of attention from them’, we can easily draw the conclusion that women would do anything, and would stop at the destruction of nothing, for more of it.

Not even guilt will stop women from being the cheating harlots that they are. That’s because women think that cheating requires some kind of expressed willingness or premeditation on their part to actually count. I shit you not, that is exactly what they say. To a woman true cheating requires a planning and malice on par with a bank robbery. If the only evidence of infidelity you can produce is that she got drunk and put herself in a compromising position, you’re up argument creek without a chance in hell.

Can you believe that? It means if a woman can somehow convince a co-worker to force himself on her, or to “rape” her, that doesn’t count as cheating. It’s just another horrible thing that’s happened to poor defenseless her in this dog eat dog, man-world of rape happy abusers. That’s obviously a bunch of bullshit, but stand back because it gets worse.

Women also don’t count miring themselves in twisted, Dynasty-styled emotional affairs as cheating. For instance, a woman may hang around with as many as five or six of her ex-boyfriends without batting an eye. She may accept niceties from male co-workers or university staff members without ever questioning the motive of a free backrub. That’s a perfectly reasonable thing to be handing out, isn’t it? A free backrub? They’re like porno pamphlets in Vegas. Sometimes I can’t even get to work without getting two or three.

Bullshit.

Like any virus, women are not content with ruining their own lives. Ultimately, they seek out the lives of decent, honest men and tempt and corrupt them until they appear to be cheaters as well when nothing could be further from the truth. Cheating is like getting pregnant. It’s 100% a woman’s fault 100% of the time.

Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

4,857 Comments in 4287 threads.»

Pages: « 21518 17 16 15 14 [13] 12 11 10 9 81 » Show All

Comment by Tony De Luca
2006-03-26 22:53:53 - IP Man-Hash: cd31d1dc41fca

You guys are a bunch of sick losers. There are plenty of women who do not cheat. You sound like all of the man hating feminists that MEN are supposed to hate. What is wrong with people today. Christ you have a bunch of man hating loser sites like dontdatehimgirl.com and now this.

 
Comment by christianj
2006-03-23 19:36:28 - IP Man-Hash: 34e3b10c32441

ChristianJ: Always good to see you posting. Is the Australian women blog yours?
-wolfe

Certainly is Wolfe, why be subtle when you can just tell it the way it is.

Australian women will provide plenty of material as they are just American skank clones and feminist wannabies.

Australian women keep their head in the sand like the clone on here, lives the feminist lies but denies association.

The automatons abound via proxy.

 
Comment by Fem
2006-03-23 15:52:52 - IP Man-Hash: 5475964f1d333

christianj said:

[blockquote removed]

Fem
If you are a woman voter, thank a feminist.
If your doctor is a woman, thank a feminist.

Interesting to see that the bitch factor has finally admitted to be a femidiot,
Something it has denied all along and continuously lied about and denied.

You are fine example of today’s ” Australian women” female.

Shallow, obnoxious, intolerable, indifferent, brainlocked in the feminist doctrine and did I say obnoxious.

Show us your lobotomy.

Your just another feminist lacky and a total waste of our time.

1. Not a feminist. Received that via email, with the other million jokes I get in my inbox everyday and I thought you’d like it.

2. How can I, or anyone, show you a lobotomy once it has occurred? And what’s with the psych language all of a sudden?

wolfe, that blog is clearly his, he has nothing better to do with his time.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-03-23 10:48:42 - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181

Fem said:

[blockquote removed]
Women are offensive items now? How wonderful for you to feel that way.

You misread my post. Try reading it again. I did not raise the issue of offensive; the other poster did. As for items, see the comparisons to beer and sushi. If you’d prefer, “set” or “group” or “class” would probably be better terms, though all vocabulary has its troubles when one attempts to use common terms in a forum such as this. Women are no more or less things (or items or objects) than men are in my view.

ChristianJ: Always good to see you posting. Is the Australian women blog yours?
-wolfe

 
Comment by christianj
2006-03-23 06:07:53 - IP Man-Hash: 34e3b10c32441

Fem said:

Do you think I’m dumb enough to have children in a society that is closely modelling the ridiculous laws of the US? Get serious.

Fem
If you are a woman voter, thank a feminist.
If your doctor is a woman, thank a feminist.

Interesting to see that the bitch factor has finally admitted to be a femidiot,
Something it has denied all along and continuously lied about and denied.

You are fine example of today’s ” Australian women” female.

Shallow, obnoxious, intolerable, indifferent, brainlocked in the feminist doctrine and did I say obnoxious.

Show us your lobotomy.

Your just another feminist lacky and a total waste of our time.

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-03-22 10:16:58 - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181

I note the posts between 315 and 358 am, bookcased by “im bleeding right now!”. They do show what a pair of drunken women at an internet cafe in the wee hours can get up to. (Note the IP hashes).

L said:
Those men who take part in this website seem to be proud and forceful in their opinions.

You would expect people who express their opinions to be milquetoasts? Interesting.

I didn’t realize there would be such difficulty understand a rather simple phrase.

The difficulty stemmed from your rather shaky syntax and sentence structure. As Abbaddon said, with only two posts, your grammar and sentence structure have improved markedly. Clearly this site is very good for you.

OFFENSIVE. I also didn’t realize such a small spelling error was such a big deal.

I simply found it an odd coincidence that two people arriving within days of one another made very similar criticisms of the site with almost identical spelling errors. No insult was intended; we all make typos.

It does not appear to me that this site exists because of a simple “distaste for feminism”or how “many” women act.

It does not appear to me that you are correct, but there we are.

To say that my reasoning is illogical is peculiar to me. Maybe you have not personally experienced someone expressing their superiority towards you.

A goodly number have tried to do so; a few have succeeded. The illogic in your reasoning is this: you seem to believe that the premise of this website (”men are better than women”) — even if fully accepted — means that women must be viewed negatively.

Not so.

We are not discussing the difference between men and sushi or women and beer. This is between men and women.

As long as you can accept the logical argument that to view A as relatively superior to B does not mean that one holds B in poor absolute regard, fine.

You have the right of your beliefs as well as to express them. As much right as I have to take offense to your expression of such beliefs.

Quite true, and well said.

How on earth can you have such beliefs towards women and still like them? That I find peculiar.

Let me be clear that I do not agree, in lockstep, with everything Dick says. That said, I find his premise persuasive. Again, this comes down to the difference between relative and absolute. On an absolute scale, I think many women are wonderful. On a relative scale, relative to men, I can choose to think “men are better than women” without that changing my absolute view of women. This is, again, the illogical portion of your argument.

How do you feel about your mother?

Interesting how it always seems to come down to this. She is a fine woman, with faults, but I cherish and love her.

I simply wanted to write a small opinion of my own. I will leave you with your thoughts and opinions, but it does not make them true!

Indeed. Much of your opinion seems to remain illogical, but it is clear you find the site offensive… because it offends you. From what you’ve said above, you feel superiority is being “personally expressed to you” by this site. If so, there’s little I can do to argue you out of an emotional view; it’s not subject to rational debate.

Kind regards,
-wolfe

 
Comment by Fem
2006-03-21 21:43:30 - IP Man-Hash: ee94550bfe94c

wolfe said:
Why can one not express one thing as being superior to another without being “affencive”, or “affensive”, or disliking the inferior item? .-wolfe

Women are offensive items now? How wonderful for you to feel that way.

wolfe said:
This reasoning is most peculiar and illogical.-wolfe

Well at least you got that right.

 
Comment by abaddon_fff
2006-03-21 20:06:06 - IP Man-Hash: 0a466d248da25

L said:

I meant what I said. Those men who take part in this website seem to be proud and forceful in their opinions. I didn’t realize there would be such difficulty understand a rather simple phrase.

-Wow, within two posts on this site your grammar and sentence stucture have improved markedly. I wonder what that means? Actually, your phrasing of it is what caused the confusion, as I had no idea what you meant. Your reasoning is flawed as well, I am proud to be a man, however I don’t see my opinions as forceful, in reality they aren’t because people CHOOSE to visit this website. I am not forcing you to read anything on here, nor am I forcing my opinion on anyone that CHOOSES to come here.

OFFENSIVE. I also didn’t realize such a small spelling error was such a big deal.

-In life it really isn’t however when posting in the written word, it becomes a crucial skill to be able to write and spell correctly, because that is the medium in which you express yourself.

It does not appear to me that this site exists because of a simple “distaste for feminism”or how “many” women act. I do agree that there are many women who do distasteful things as well as men, but that is far from saying all women or men are one way or another.

-Well, maybe if you would actually READ the posts and the forums then you might begin to understand. However I suspect that you looked at the websites name and instantly assumed a few things. I agree with you on the idea that not all women are bad or men ect ect. However many of womens distasteful acts are hidden by the media, or an excuse is made for their actions, whereas men are held to a higher standard of accountability.

To say that my reasoning is illogical is peculiar to me. Maybe you have not personally experienced someone expressing their superiority towards you.

-I have, and to be honest, some people are superior in many ways to me, however I don’t take offense to it I simply try to better myself at what I was doing.

We are not discussing the difference between men and sushi or women and beer. This is between men and women. Some men are rapists but I am not about to say that ALL men or EVERY man is a rapist. We are all human and to be human is not to be perfect. We all have our faults and our strengths.

-Agreed, however the same statement has been said of men by feminists. That all men are rapists, and that all men are oppressors of the female sex. These are the same people that dictate quite a bit of public policy, and control huge sums of money for the “protection of women”. I would ask why you aren’t visting their sites and complaining to them. Is it that you don’t find the idea of women proclaiming these things as offensive as you do men? I wonder what that means?

 
Comment by Grump
2006-03-21 19:33:32 - IP Man-Hash: 60b660aafc3e4

I wonder how many women would get this sort of flak if they said: “women are better than men”. Not very many.

Which reminds me! Dick! lol I tried typing ‘womenarebetterthanmen.com’ just to see whether some smartass chick installed a site merely to mimic and mock your own! lol

 
Comment by L
2006-03-21 18:44:39 - IP Man-Hash: 8a495a3f5447b

I meant what I said. Those men who take part in this website seem to be proud and forceful in their opinions. I didn’t realize there would be such difficulty understand a rather simple phrase.
OFFENSIVE. I also didn’t realize such a small spelling error was such a big deal.
It does not appear to me that this site exists because of a simple “distaste for feminism”or how “many” women act. I do agree that there are many women who do distasteful things as well as men, but that is far from saying all women or men are one way or another.
To say that my reasoning is illogical is peculiar to me. Maybe you have not personally experienced someone expressing their superiority towards you.
We are not discussing the difference between men and sushi or women and beer. This is between men and women. Some men are rapists but I am not about to say that ALL men or EVERY man is a rapist. We are all human and to be human is not to be perfect. We all have our faults and our strengths.
You have the right of your beliefs as well as to express them. As much right as I have to take offense to your expression of such beliefs. How on earth can you have such beliefs towards women and still like them? That I find peculiar. How do you feel about your mother?
I simply wanted to write a small opinion of my own. I will leave you with your thoughts and opinions, but it does not make them true!

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-03-21 15:29:56 - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181

Me said:

i found this verry affencive

L said:

I have to say that I find this site and all it stands for so completely affensive.

Darn. I thought L and Me were the same person. Guess not.

Sorry you find the site ‘affensive’, L.

L said:

Is it just women you dislike with just pride and force?

I’m not even sure what that sentence means. How does one dislike with pride? Or dislike with force? Did L mean “Do you only dislike proud and forceful women?”. Or perhaps “Do you dislike women because you are proud and forceful?”. Or even “Do you especially dislike proud and forceful women?”

Whatever was intended in that scrambled mess of syntax, few here, if any, dislike women. There is a marked distaste for feminism, and for the behavior of many women.

I think men are better than sushi, but I don’t dislike sushi. I think women are better than beer (sometimes at least), but I don’t dislike beer or women.

Why can one not express one thing as being superior to another without being “affencive”, or “affensive”, or disliking the inferior item? This reasoning is most peculiar and illogical.

Best,
-wolfe

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2006-03-21 12:38:04 - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3

Men are not better in some ways than women. Men are better in all ways.

-Dick

 
Comment by L
2006-03-21 12:36:17 - IP Man-Hash: 8a495a3f5447b

I have to say that I find this site and all it stands for so completely affensive. I also think this will not matter to you. I realize that for all time there has been the same argument that men are better, in some way, than women. And I realize that there will always be those people who feel that way. Just like there will always be racists. However, I find it quite disgusting, to say the least, how much time people like yourselves seem to waste arguing superiority and making such invalid generalizations. What is it that made you all (those men who create and run this site) feel so strongly against women? Is it just women you dislike with just pride and force?

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2006-03-20 13:19:43 - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3

You’re dumb enough to do anything you set your silly little head to. You’re a woman.

-Dick

 
Comment by Fem
2006-03-20 13:16:58 - IP Man-Hash: dd1b911ab43ac

Do you think I’m dumb enough to have children in a society that is closely modelling the ridiculous laws of the US? Get serious.

 
Comment by christianj
2006-03-20 05:11:30 - IP Man-Hash: 34e3b10c32441

Tim Crooks Says:
March 20th, 2006 at 3:45 am- IP Man-Hash: 719f525213722

im bleeding right now! Says:
March 20th, 2006 at 3:50 am- IP Man-Hash: 719f525213722

Fem, keep your kids under control.

 
Comment by Fem
2006-03-20 03:54:21 - IP Man-Hash: dd1b911ab43ac

Excuse me, are you a man? Cause I’m about to call Bullshit.

 
Comment by im bleeding right now!
2006-03-20 03:50:13 - IP Man-Hash: 719f525213722

i know how you feel! ive just had this guy over, hes a friend from works ex and he wanted to have sex with me so i agreed… he wasnt respectful, he didnt listen when i told him it hurt, and after he have cum inside me (not to mention i might get pregnant) he did up his pants and left… thats not decsency! thats abuse!

 
Comment by Abaddon_fff
2006-03-20 02:07:00 - IP Man-Hash: a0da30bfb699d

Melissa said:

You say all women are cheating whores, but why is it that men are caught cheating more? Are you mad because many women get away with such things because guys are so easily manipulted when sex is involved.

-Yes, it is one of the more disgusting traits of some women to “manipulate” the sex drive of men for their own gain. Instead of learning to “love” someone they would rather manipulate them for money or whatever they want, because it’s so much easier. If I may add it’s also the sign of a lazy mind and an insecure heart. They also “get away” with it because a lot of men are willing to forgive them (big mistake).

And I would have you know that not evry women cheats when she is in a relationship! I do not know who in their right mind would make a sight like this!

-Of course not, nor does every man either. Anyone with half a brain knows that. What I ask of you is to ask yourself, why does a “site” like this exist? Things like this don’t just pop up out of nowhere. You wonder but you don’t ponder.

Just remember, although a man is needed, the women is the one to carry the little boy in her for 9 months before he is born and is the one to raise him. Fuck face…guys like you should and will, burn in hell!

-Ahh, we are “needed” thats nice to hear. What I think happens is that men give up their control of half of the reproductive process, either through trust (”manipulation”) or for money (sperm bank). However that puts us at odds with our very nature, which is to share this “gift”. Granted that a woman is an “incubator” for a child, however that doesn’t make her a better parent, the law just says it does. How many women have you heard of that have abused their child, or killed them for that matter? I will add that men do the same however in the courts eyes there is a presumption of women being superior in childcare which is in complete defiance of reality. The reason why she is the one to “raise” him is because of the way the system is set up and for the most part, with children women become jealous of their “entitlements”. I think its because many are actually pretty selfish with their children, and have no understanding of the effects of fatherlessness. If things were actually “fair”, which they aren’t and probably never will be, then BOTH parents would be considered equally culpable in the raising of children.

 
Comment by Fem
2006-03-20 00:51:00 - IP Man-Hash: dd1b911ab43ac

Dick Masterson said:

[blockquote removed]

Because women don’t trust anything that moves.
Fem’s corollary: that is attached to a penis.
-Dick

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis