Every Woman is a Cheating Whore
Oh yes, that’s right. That’s what I said. And I said it because it’s true. All women are cheaters.
I don’t mean this to be a provocateur or to prance around in the realm of the hypothetical like some kind of dandy. I mean, flat out, that every woman in the world is a cheater, has cheated, and is probably cheating at this very moment.
Getting a woman to cheat on her husband or significant other is not like getting a woman to go to the gym — by heaping shitloads of gifts and attention on her like a spoilt child and then ultimately getting no burn for your earn. Getting a woman to cheat is like getting a duck to eat bread crumbs or a rat to eat rubbish. All you have to do is toss it in front of their face.
It’s not a hard conclusion to draw, so let’s just look at the facts. Getting attention from men is a woman’s lifeblood. That’s why women worship men in the form of menial tasks that they’re not very good at — because men control our attention like the gods of old controlled the sun and the crypt. We giveth and we can taketh away.
Good attention, bad attention, the worst kind of attention; it doesn’t matter. To a woman, being in a Girls Gone Wild video is just as laudable as serving in a highly respected public office. They stack up eyeballs like empty pie plates at a NOW convention.
So let’s compare: a woman’s lust for attention versus a man’s desire to consume or waste things — something very manly indeed. Take throwing a sandwich in the street for example. Do you know what’s better than throwing a sandwich in the street? That’s right, throwing two sandwiches in the street. Now what if that sandwich cost twice as much as the first? What if you had to wait in line again to get it? I would probably still do it and I’m betting that most men would. But what if dealing with two sandwiches cost you your dignity, your job, and your soul?
Women, of course, have none of those things — or at least don’t have 2 out of 3. That’s why when we change ’sandwiches’ to ‘men’ and ‘throwing them in the street’ to ‘getting any kind of attention from them’, we can easily draw the conclusion that women would do anything, and would stop at the destruction of nothing, for more of it.
Not even guilt will stop women from being the cheating harlots that they are. That’s because women think that cheating requires some kind of expressed willingness or premeditation on their part to actually count. I shit you not, that is exactly what they say. To a woman true cheating requires a planning and malice on par with a bank robbery. If the only evidence of infidelity you can produce is that she got drunk and put herself in a compromising position, you’re up argument creek without a chance in hell.
Can you believe that? It means if a woman can somehow convince a co-worker to force himself on her, or to “rape” her, that doesn’t count as cheating. It’s just another horrible thing that’s happened to poor defenseless her in this dog eat dog, man-world of rape happy abusers. That’s obviously a bunch of bullshit, but stand back because it gets worse.
Women also don’t count miring themselves in twisted, Dynasty-styled emotional affairs as cheating. For instance, a woman may hang around with as many as five or six of her ex-boyfriends without batting an eye. She may accept niceties from male co-workers or university staff members without ever questioning the motive of a free backrub. That’s a perfectly reasonable thing to be handing out, isn’t it? A free backrub? They’re like porno pamphlets in Vegas. Sometimes I can’t even get to work without getting two or three.
Bullshit.
Like any virus, women are not content with ruining their own lives. Ultimately, they seek out the lives of decent, honest men and tempt and corrupt them until they appear to be cheaters as well when nothing could be further from the truth. Cheating is like getting pregnant. It’s 100% a woman’s fault 100% of the time.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 213 … 176 175 174 173 172 [171] 170 169 168 167 166 … 1 » Show All
Voting changes nothing in the present context. Elites will never yield their dominion except by force. Voting is a con-trick to fool working class gammas of all stripes into thinking they have a say in things. They do not. True misplaced Alphas like Carl Panzram never yielded to any establishment drivel, as they knew its true nature and purpose.
This is an American site, and its general thrust is American. Americans are most prominent in men’s studies and most vocal in resistance to feminism. Could this be because Americans man have unusually high expectations of life, due to the widespread myth of socio-economic fluidity that defines that country… that anyone can do anything. In recent history, Americans COULD do anything, of course - like in that movie, There will be Blood. But in the post war world, Wright Mills noted a closure in American society preventing ordinary Americans from attaining their desired status. Gone are the Presidents like Abe Lincoln who passed law exams in the backwoods by candlelight - all modern Presidents and their opponents are Ivy League/Skull and Bones alumni. This closure relates to women in particular, as the post-War liberal settlement allowed wealthy men to monopolise a succession of desirable women due to the removal of monogamous restraints on mate choice. And yet, unlike other peoples, ordinary American men EXPECT a high quality mate (or the chance to attain one) as a perk of their culture. Their baffled rage at removal of this perk is distinctively American, a part of lofty American ‘expectation’ if you will, which explains the emergence of sites like this in response to removal of this ‘right’ by chance and circumstance.
RE the elite exchange theory, it is demonstrated by genetics that males display less distinctive variance than females, because of massively uneven male mating success in history. By comparison, females are guaranteed children. This indicates periodic historical bottlenecks when elite men indeed monopolised vast numbers of women. Matt Ridley points out that in Aztec society, all kids were the children of important/powerful men. The fallout of this, however, is that even low status males will have alpha genes and qualities, which explains their success in throwing off elite oppression and founding their own dynasties… and so on… and on….and on. Criminals, serial killers, rapists and revolutionaries are in fact misplaced Alphas, wanting their sexual share of the cake, like Edgar in King Lear.
So, the unwelcome people are telling people to get out now. Irony. Social parasite much?
I guess everything is bigger in texas, including the bullshit.
There are an alarming number of complete total fucking morons in this world. Most of them seem inclined to post on this site. Take responsibility for your own actions. Don’t blame another socio-economic class, gender, race or anything else for your own shortcomings. Like they say in Texas… “Be a man and nut up”.
You get the fuck off, you chronically-lying fucktard of certified fucktard ancestry. Everyone knows your a misanthrope and so that means that you hate everybody here on this site. If so, why should we give a fuck what you think, Mr Homicidal Rapist? Oh, thats right, you wont do that yourself, your goal is to get others to do that for you. Fucktard loser.
Are you still here, agentofsexualfrigidity? Get the fuck off the site, you frigid, fast food-eating Anglo-fuck cunt.
I have three concerns about your argument. My first concern is that I sense you have a feeling of entitlement to an attractive and virtuous woman. Or, at the very least, you might feel that your entitlement to a women of this type should be as much as that of a wealthier person. I have a couple of problems with this. One, it goes against natural laws that predict that women will be disproportionately drawn (compared to men) to the partners with the most resources, so what your asking for maybe impossible to grant. The 2nd problem I have is if you feel a sense of entitlement than your no better than radical feminists that have this feeling as well, which strikes me as hypocritical, which is not a masculine character.
My second concern is with whom your directing your rage at. According to your model, women are submissive pawns to system generated by the power elite of the USA. If this is the case, shouldn’t you be directly your anger an the elite instead of the women? If so, then it would seem to me it would be in your interest to support political parties that promote an effective transfer of wealth from the rich to the poor, which is the Democratic, more than the Republican party. A mechanism by which this could happen is by the elimination of the Bush tax cuts for the wealthy, for example.
My third concern is about the mechanism by which you feel the elite gets extraordinary power recently which is by increased taxed revenue. However, increased taxation of the rich versus the poor would effectively re-distribute the wealth in our country, and presumably affect would be to increased opportunities for the disenfranchised men with women.
Overall, I have a major concern about why your desire to destroy the present system. To me, it seems like the major goal is for you to have increased power and authority so that you use the same, traditional mechanisms you have been railing against to get “hot” and virtuous women. This strikes me as extremely hypocritical and therefore unmasculine.
BTW, I am not a member of the elite. Although I have some education, I make approx $50 K/yr, which puts me in the middle class, I guess.
Wow…Since the last time I checked in it seems that the discourse has gone up a notch in terms of intelligence. Although it all seems a little detached and cynical about the value of intimate relationships, at least we are starting to get to the crux of the matter - that social engineering and capitalism are central to the dysfunction between the sexes rather than there being a feminist war on men or a misogynist war against women.
Muzalon we must make sure that men with daring and significant leadership talent can give the men of the West something to unite under rather than feminine self obsessed apathy and amoral lives in front of game consoles and porn.
It is not enough to passively watch as the mechanisms of Western man fall into pathetic mediocrity all because pencil dick elites with money and lesgislative power wanted to fuck 10’s.
The powerful who’s might is derived from artificial systems like currency and politik must be wiped from existance.. to be replaced by the power derived from the Natural Order. Masculine, charismatic, intelligence.
Singleness among men will set China marching through other countries before long. Singleness in men will have a different impact in the West - increasing lawlessness, anomie and male self-exclusion. Healthy societies have always compensated single men - not this one; and for that reason, it will perish, or at least, fall into decline.
Light the blue touchpaper and stand well back.
@Muzalon: this is a serious suggestion: Maybe you and SOTS should write a book about this. It can encompass evidence from this site to the situation in present day China. Maybe you get get Steven Pinker to write a forward.
A brilliant analysis. I propose a new form of socio-biological power-elite theory, that explains the whole of history: elites rise up to monopolise sexual access to women via harems, anti-rape legislation, and so on. Their genetic quality declines through out-breeding. Then, some of the sexually disenfranchised males below rise up, kill them off, and take their turn with the women. And so on… and on. A good example would be China, where the Emperor and his cronies enjoyed vast harems until the ‘Communist’ revolution. Then, Mao took over, and he an HIS cronies were fucking ten virgins a day. No doubt another revolution is on the cards. But all revolutions really change nothing, only the men who enjoy unlimited sexual access to women. Communist, fascist or capitalist, it all amounts to the same thing. A heady blend of Edward O Wilson and Vilfredo Pareto, if you will.
I would suggest most of the straight gentile guys here are in a revolutionary ferment, just waiting to rise up and supplant the post-war liberal elite across the Anglosphere. As Heinlein and Wilson opine, societies with large numbers of single men are unstable, since they have no reason to be obedient, facing genetic extinction as they are. We are on the cusp of a revolution, as there are vast numbers of single men with nothing to lose and everything to gain by ’sexual disobedience’.
all i have to say is that any guy who believes this s hit is gay. i also believe that you Dick are also homosexual. For what other reason would u write this ignorant garbage. You need to open your eyes because women are getting stronger & stronger every day. Your just helping us realize that we need to work that much harder to be rid of this chauvinistic attitude that you & your followers seem to have. In conclusion, suck a dick, Dick, & do what you do best, take it in the ass.
Upper middle class/rich elites like Dick benefit from feminism irregardless because they have the wealth to buy females and clean up all their messes ad infinium. I don’t give a fuck how my viewpoints conflict with his or if my camp of radicals is banned from the site.
Us lower class peasants meanwhile are powerless to breed by lack of wealth and political power. It’s a hilarious arrogance really on the part of the democratically cloaked aristocrat scum. The only thing that held Western slash and burn capitalism together so long was the fact that the underclases could have a loyal and attractive female and offspring to give them serenity inbetween their plowing and assembly line slaving.
But I guess wealth, power, a wife and a few mistresses isn’t enough. The yankee greed machines wanted double the tax revenue and to use those same income sources as a neverending stream of city dwelling corporate concubines that would make a Persion emporor flinch.
This order is corrupt beyond belief and cannot be aloud to infect the world any longer. It must be raped, destroyed, and burnt. I’m not a pervert but if I had men under my command who wanted to violate every dupe slut I wouldn’t shed a tear. Unit cohesion in great causes comes before a morally clouded mind towards subhuman’s who don’t share the same morality.
And i
And I assumed all men were idiots. Thank you no manhole. There are a few men on this site who don’t get it at all. They have their own ideas of chauvinism which include rape, murder and genocide and Im fairly certain these thoughts do not coincide with what Dick is trying to do here. A true chauvinisit is a gentlemen because he understands, like it’s been said so many times “you can’t blame a woman in the same way you can’t blame a dog” so do you rape and murder dogs? No you take care of them, you provide the things they cannot provide themselves. How many chauvinistic men on here are truely confortable with some of the comments being made?
Frankly, as a woman, she shouldn’t even be here. So no, no good points.
I think one thing she’s pointing out is a difference between the relative critical thinking of Dick and, on the other hand, the hate-based lying, calling for death commentary of Commander Scott. I think she makes a good point.
Look, fool. Don’t waste your time on this site if you are so intent on bypassing it and bringing it down with every commentary. Read the comments, don’t post, just don’t.
hahahahaha =]
this is soooooooooo true
im glad i found this i shall quote this forever