Every Woman is a Cheating Whore
Oh yes, that’s right. That’s what I said. And I said it because it’s true. All women are cheaters.
I don’t mean this to be a provocateur or to prance around in the realm of the hypothetical like some kind of dandy. I mean, flat out, that every woman in the world is a cheater, has cheated, and is probably cheating at this very moment.
Getting a woman to cheat on her husband or significant other is not like getting a woman to go to the gym — by heaping shitloads of gifts and attention on her like a spoilt child and then ultimately getting no burn for your earn. Getting a woman to cheat is like getting a duck to eat bread crumbs or a rat to eat rubbish. All you have to do is toss it in front of their face.
It’s not a hard conclusion to draw, so let’s just look at the facts. Getting attention from men is a woman’s lifeblood. That’s why women worship men in the form of menial tasks that they’re not very good at — because men control our attention like the gods of old controlled the sun and the crypt. We giveth and we can taketh away.
Good attention, bad attention, the worst kind of attention; it doesn’t matter. To a woman, being in a Girls Gone Wild video is just as laudable as serving in a highly respected public office. They stack up eyeballs like empty pie plates at a NOW convention.
So let’s compare: a woman’s lust for attention versus a man’s desire to consume or waste things — something very manly indeed. Take throwing a sandwich in the street for example. Do you know what’s better than throwing a sandwich in the street? That’s right, throwing two sandwiches in the street. Now what if that sandwich cost twice as much as the first? What if you had to wait in line again to get it? I would probably still do it and I’m betting that most men would. But what if dealing with two sandwiches cost you your dignity, your job, and your soul?
Women, of course, have none of those things — or at least don’t have 2 out of 3. That’s why when we change ’sandwiches’ to ‘men’ and ‘throwing them in the street’ to ‘getting any kind of attention from them’, we can easily draw the conclusion that women would do anything, and would stop at the destruction of nothing, for more of it.
Not even guilt will stop women from being the cheating harlots that they are. That’s because women think that cheating requires some kind of expressed willingness or premeditation on their part to actually count. I shit you not, that is exactly what they say. To a woman true cheating requires a planning and malice on par with a bank robbery. If the only evidence of infidelity you can produce is that she got drunk and put herself in a compromising position, you’re up argument creek without a chance in hell.
Can you believe that? It means if a woman can somehow convince a co-worker to force himself on her, or to “rape” her, that doesn’t count as cheating. It’s just another horrible thing that’s happened to poor defenseless her in this dog eat dog, man-world of rape happy abusers. That’s obviously a bunch of bullshit, but stand back because it gets worse.
Women also don’t count miring themselves in twisted, Dynasty-styled emotional affairs as cheating. For instance, a woman may hang around with as many as five or six of her ex-boyfriends without batting an eye. She may accept niceties from male co-workers or university staff members without ever questioning the motive of a free backrub. That’s a perfectly reasonable thing to be handing out, isn’t it? A free backrub? They’re like porno pamphlets in Vegas. Sometimes I can’t even get to work without getting two or three.
Bullshit.
Like any virus, women are not content with ruining their own lives. Ultimately, they seek out the lives of decent, honest men and tempt and corrupt them until they appear to be cheaters as well when nothing could be further from the truth. Cheating is like getting pregnant. It’s 100% a woman’s fault 100% of the time.
Related Articles:
November 22nd, 2005 at 3:35 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9efaeb2a8447e
Pfft. Do you people seriously blame women for affairs? How very interesting, you are all incredibly moralistic and conceited aren’t you? Ever heard the expression, “it takes two to tango?” No, you probably haven’t. Too busy being self-absorbed and complete and utter fuckwits.
November 22nd, 2005 at 4:21 pm - IP Man-Hash: 1cc2bd319db66
hi female
“Female” :Ever heard the expression, “it takes two to tango?â€?
so you also think a single man should be held morally responsible for the plan to cheat, which the woman made to begin with, and which the single man didn´t have any idea of? that is absurd.
Half-Soul
November 22nd, 2005 at 5:12 pm - IP Man-Hash: dd25bee8154fe
wtf? That is not how I interpreted dick’s story, but in regards to your example, if the woman was in a relationship and pursued the other man (then of course she is responsible), however, if the single man knew she was in a relationship but still decided to also pursue a relationship with the woman, then he is equally responsible. At the end of the day, you can’t help who you fall “in love/lust/infatuation” with, so I think it comes down to weighing up the pros and cons of the decision to engage in elicit behaviour. If their are children involved, especially young ones, it is generally ill-advised. Sometimes love is also inaction, in that, you have to sacrifice your own feelings and walk away for the benefit of others.
November 22nd, 2005 at 7:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: 2d19dfc739b51
Feamle said “At the end of the day, you can’t help who you fall “in love/lust/infatuationâ€? with…”
How predictably refreshing, how originally banal. How so very unusually typical of a female to completely DENY RESPONSIBILITY. You just got finished saying it takes two to tango and everyone within a 2km radius shares in the responsibility of YOUR ACTIONS and then you turn around and summarily deny same.
What a surprise.
Female, you should really stop wasting your breath in this pig dog haven of meesogeenust men and their rape extensions. You are VERY PREDICTABLE and everything you say is a variation on the same theme.
Why dont you just cut to the chase and drop the FE and just admit that you wish you were a MALE. Your choice of handle says it all. You are here not to challenge us, but to challenge yourself. Wading thru your latent penis envy is getting old.
November 22nd, 2005 at 10:12 pm - IP Man-Hash: 957564b4aff6d
Mr. Masterson has his beliefs on the issue, which I am not going to attempt to change - my personal belief is that women are 100% responsible for their own actions - and men are also 100% responsible for their own actions.
And you can help whom you fall in love/lust/infatuation with. People can control their own thoughts and emotions, rather than letting their thoughts and emotions control them.
November 23rd, 2005 at 2:39 am - IP Man-Hash: 5934e066dd9d4
I have yet to meet a woman that isn’t flattered by any scrap of attention that comes her way. Even if it is the spotty-faced kid behind the counter handing out her bucket of lard, she’s still smiling or winking her to herself ‘hey, i still got it’.
As for a genuine hot whore, well, it’s like there’s a party in her pants and all the cool guys are invited. Females, regardless of relationship status, will prance around like the cheapest two dollar hooker for a bit of good ole boy, particularly if they know they can’t be caught. Females I work with who try this I view with contempt. I have a rule of ‘Don’t screw the crew’, but your average female worker thinks that fucking or sucking their way around the workplace is just something you do as part of the whole ‘work’ thing.
Trust me, age does not weary them. The older slappers, potential mothers and grand mothers are some of the worst. whores and harlots, the lot of ‘em. If they didn’t have hairy checkbooks, they would be stacked 10 high at the rubbish tip.
November 23rd, 2005 at 8:21 am - IP Man-Hash: 6c059e71336cb
A-freakin-men, Dick.
Arielle does have a point–everyone is responsible for his own actions. The difference between men and non-men is that men take responsibility. In every case in my circles where there has been an affair on the man’s part, he honed up to it (even the one who openly stated that he was going to carry on with the woman he was having an affair with.) The women I know who have had affairs just blame the men or say it wasn’t really cheating–every time.
I know about a half-dozen hot women, any one of whom I could call up for some action at any time for free. Some of them are married. The only reason I don’t is because I’m a man (okay, and an old-fashioned abstinence freak), but because I am a man, it is only natural that I don’t think with my reproductive organs.
November 23rd, 2005 at 10:38 am - IP Man-Hash: 957564b4aff6d
Ian, you’re a man to be respected.
November 23rd, 2005 at 7:36 pm - IP Man-Hash: cbda87eba97d3
“I know about a half-dozen hot women, any one of whom I could call up for some action at any time for free. Some of them are married. The only reason I don’t is because I’m a man ”
Lol, Ian you just made my day.
November 23rd, 2005 at 9:22 pm - IP Man-Hash: d754ab99d7c00
Ian: interesting blog.
On this matter [affairs], as on many moral matters, I like to think about both culpability and responsibility. Culpability is guilt: what you have done is wrong. Responsibility is neutral: you can be responsible for a heinous act, or for a heroic one.
I won’t speak for men in general, but for myself, and I always consider myself to be responsible. I do not think I would ever have an affair outside marriage or a long-term committment. However, here are my thoughts about such an event.
If I ever had an affair, I’d be responsible. Especially an involvement — while I was single — with a married woman even if I didn’t know she was married but failed to do due diligence on her. (Now if I was uninvolved, and she faked her identity, claimed to be single, masqueraded as such brilliantly, put together a set of friends to lie to me for her, rented a separate apartment, then yes, while I would still be responsible, my culpability would be greatly diminished.)
If I were married, about the only thing that I could see greatly reducing my culpability — though not responsibility — to roughly zero would be repeated, continual denial of intimacy (physical and emotional) from my wife over many years.
Even then, an affair would have to be with a single woman who knew from the beginning the circumstances and never received a false promise from me. (e.g. “My wife doesn’t understand me, you do baby, I’ll divorce her soon” and such odious trash).
Even then [with long-term denial of intimacy] there are circumstances were to get involved with someone else would leave me culpable. A woman who uses intimacy (and denial of it) as a weapon is not to be respected. She has broken her marital vows. A woman who has been raped and remains terrified even in the marital bed for 2 years … that’s completely different.
To sum up: I think the look at this as an issue solely of responsibility is only part of the matter; culpability matters as well.
But that’s just my 2 cents.
Best to all, especially Ian,
-wolfe
November 25th, 2005 at 5:24 am - IP Man-Hash: b7795a2dc403c
Arielle, please reread what I posted. I never said emotions and thoughts couldn’t be controlled, I said you cannot help who you fall for. Ever seen Dangerious Liaisons? ‘beyond my control’ springs to mind. Top movie, should’ve been in that earlier movie list. Anyhow, yes I agree, it is possible to break your own heart and walk away, just not very nice that’s all.
November 27th, 2005 at 2:04 pm - IP Man-Hash: a11c28e7713fa
Dear Female,
Christ you speak absolute and utter codswallop.
Surely that VD infested cunt of yours must be loose enough by now to get your entire head up there.
“Clearly, I can see that the comment I made about being friends with my exbf,”
You can’t be “friends” with an ex-BF. It shows disloyalty to the man you are with- Hanging around with someone that you used to fuck. Men don’t hang around with their ex-GF’s. Why? Because of the prefix- “Ex.” Fuck you’re a dozy mole.
Of course, it wouldn’t be like a woman to give a rats kazoo how someone else may perceive the situation, or to be loyal to one.
“Because I said I was in love with someone else.”
Women love only themselves and what they can get from a man. That shit from your mouth is getting so thick you can walk on it.
“Which lead to Dick and various others calling me a whore.”
If it walks like a duck…
“Do you people seriously blame women for affairs?”
Because if she doesn’t open her filthy legs- Nothing would happen.
“At the end of the day, you can’t help who you fall “in love/lust/infatuationâ€? with…”
That’s what you tell yourself as you bounce around from one man to the other isn’t it? Slut. Grow some balls. If you love someone- You love them without question and to the exclusion of all others.
But I suppose a harlot like you wouldn’t understand that.
You women are disease infested rats jumping ship everytime a new and more appealing larder appears.
You really are a worthless whore of the lowest order.
November 27th, 2005 at 9:57 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5475964f1d333
How disgusting. If you bothered to read (and learn to spell) you would know that Female has been banned and therefore won’t be able to answer your insulting post, so hopefully she won’t mind me responding on her behalf. I think your post is absolutely disgraceful and you ought to take a very hard look at yourself in the mirror. Dick, as sitemaster, I would urge you to ban pigs like this from posting their filthy words.
November 27th, 2005 at 11:53 pm - IP Man-Hash: ac62c77584632
She started it.
-Dick
November 28th, 2005 at 12:02 am - IP Man-Hash: 127ff9689b3c3
Femalemark2 Says:
“so hopefully she won’t mind me responding on her behalf.”
Another from the same hyve ?
What difference does it make.
November 28th, 2005 at 12:49 am - IP Man-Hash: b7795a2dc403c
Femalemark2, thanks a lot for that, yes, this guy is a jerk of the highest order. Now, I don’t know how you feel about vulgar language, it doesn’t sound like you like it too much, but I’m afraid I’m going to have to address Mickey - hereafter to be referred to as the “mouse” - with a few expletives, he clearly needs one in particular that begins with an F. Sorry mouse, but you won’t be getting that one from me, no matter how much you beg for it.
You are a major fucktard, that is perfectly clear, you are also a presumptive little shit. You are calling me a slut and a whore because 1. I said I am still friends (not lovers) with my ex-boyfriend and 2. because I said I am in love with someone else. Here’s the thing, I am not shagging my ex (not that that is any of your sick fucking business) and 2. I may be “in love” with someone else but I am not with this person…..so why don’t you go and find the nearest shape appropriating a broom handle and jam it up your arse. You’ll enjoy it, I’m sure about that.
November 28th, 2005 at 6:43 am - IP Man-Hash: d754ab99d7c00
He did. That’s exactly why “Female” was banned. If you actually read what she wrote, she cursed nearly continuously, and repeatedly made crude personal attacks.
That having been said, no, I don’t support Mickey’s choice of words. They are crude and cruel. Though the accuracy of “you speak absolute and utter codswallop.” cannot be denied, nor can the fact that he responded to her in the manner which she herself initiated.
Moreover, by site Terms of Service, he has a right to be here (even cruel and crude); she doesn’t.
If Mickey (a newish poster) slammed a woman like Arielle (who has posted here) with language like that, I would probably politely remonstrate, though not to the point of conflict. Arielle, whatever her faults, has behaved like a lady. Female has behaved like an obnoxious whinging irrational creature spewing venom.
-wolfe
November 28th, 2005 at 12:46 pm - IP Man-Hash: 637bafa67bded
So in your opinion then, regardless of the accuracy of the mouse’s statements, it is okay for him to call me a slut and a whore, even though, in your words, those words are “cruel” and “crude”.???
I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again in case you didn’t see it with your substandard man eyes, you are a nasty piece of work.
November 28th, 2005 at 2:18 pm - IP Man-Hash: a11c28e7713fa
Guide for Women Engaged in an Argument They’ve Started.
1. If you’ve started the argument and are responded to in-kind, pretended to be hurt at the words you’ve just heard.
2. Call the other person crude and hurtful, even if your words previously match what has just been said by you.
3. Cry and whimper a little bit.
4. Question whether the male who insulted you really needs sexual intercourse. Then proclaim that he will never get it off you.
5. Justify, justify, justify. “I’m not really shagging him,” “I’m in love with another.” Then state “But it’s not like any of this is your business.”
6. Get the opinion of other people and then turn on them.
7. Sit in the corner and bitch a little more.
Female. It absolutely baffles the mind. How many times have you been told, that as a woman, you aren’t welcome here? How many times does someone have to tell you something before it seeps through that thick layer of bone, you call a cranium and into that worthless pile of tissue you’d like to call a brain?
Do you get some sick perverted thrill out of standing around here like the proverbial mad woman on the corner, screaming at passers-by with your virulent words and ideas, attempting and believing that somehow you might just convert others over to your way of thinking, yet still not realising that all we see is a crazy bitch, finger banging herself and ranting uncontrollably?
Did I, in any shape or form ask you about your personal life? No. You volunteered the information freely. Your behaviour is therefore up for debate or ridicule.
If my words disturb you, or my choice of language offends you, why not run back under the covers with a flashlight and hope that all the little monsters get out of your room and leave you alone?
The sad part about all of this- Is that you don’t get it. You, like many women, wouldn’t have the faintest idea about what it’s like to look through another’s eyes. You, like the other creatures in your species, narrow their world view down to the light of pin that focuses upon one person.
Yourselves.
Consider for one moment, how it must feel for your boyfriend, or significant other, to see you galavanting around with an ex-BF? Despite the fact, the nutless wonder may say he is “cool” with it, he is deep down offended and hurt that you would spend time with someone that you aren’t supposed to be seeing anymore.
Human beings are simple creatures, and despite our collective imploration that we are a civil and modern species, we are still primitive beings, with primitive emotions- Emotions like jealousy.
So, even though he may state it is fine, deep down he’d love to pick up the nearest piece of two by four and beat the bastard senseless.
You think about living with that feeling.
Then you start to get deeper into this maelstrom of shit that women infect the world with. Their lies, deceit, harlotry, their dishonesty, the nagging, the bitchiness, the two faced behaviour and their general level of selfishness which defies the imagination.
Would it not be much to ask the women of the world, to treat others, especially the ones they love, with a quiet dignity, respect and honesty, that many, notice I didn’t say “all,” men treat their partners, girlfriends and wives with?
In this world- No. Tied up in their own little worlds a woman sees only herself and what she can gain.
And that is why I called you a worthless whore.
November 28th, 2005 at 2:19 pm - IP Man-Hash: eadd56da2c7c9
Don’t dish it out if you can’t take it, Female.
A man would understand that.