Every Woman is a Cheating Whore
Oh yes, that’s right. That’s what I said. And I said it because it’s true. All women are cheaters.
I don’t mean this to be a provocateur or to prance around in the realm of the hypothetical like some kind of dandy. I mean, flat out, that every woman in the world is a cheater, has cheated, and is probably cheating at this very moment.
Getting a woman to cheat on her husband or significant other is not like getting a woman to go to the gym — by heaping shitloads of gifts and attention on her like a spoilt child and then ultimately getting no burn for your earn. Getting a woman to cheat is like getting a duck to eat bread crumbs or a rat to eat rubbish. All you have to do is toss it in front of their face.
It’s not a hard conclusion to draw, so let’s just look at the facts. Getting attention from men is a woman’s lifeblood. That’s why women worship men in the form of menial tasks that they’re not very good at — because men control our attention like the gods of old controlled the sun and the crypt. We giveth and we can taketh away.
Good attention, bad attention, the worst kind of attention; it doesn’t matter. To a woman, being in a Girls Gone Wild video is just as laudable as serving in a highly respected public office. They stack up eyeballs like empty pie plates at a NOW convention.
So let’s compare: a woman’s lust for attention versus a man’s desire to consume or waste things — something very manly indeed. Take throwing a sandwich in the street for example. Do you know what’s better than throwing a sandwich in the street? That’s right, throwing two sandwiches in the street. Now what if that sandwich cost twice as much as the first? What if you had to wait in line again to get it? I would probably still do it and I’m betting that most men would. But what if dealing with two sandwiches cost you your dignity, your job, and your soul?
Women, of course, have none of those things — or at least don’t have 2 out of 3. That’s why when we change ’sandwiches’ to ‘men’ and ‘throwing them in the street’ to ‘getting any kind of attention from them’, we can easily draw the conclusion that women would do anything, and would stop at the destruction of nothing, for more of it.
Not even guilt will stop women from being the cheating harlots that they are. That’s because women think that cheating requires some kind of expressed willingness or premeditation on their part to actually count. I shit you not, that is exactly what they say. To a woman true cheating requires a planning and malice on par with a bank robbery. If the only evidence of infidelity you can produce is that she got drunk and put herself in a compromising position, you’re up argument creek without a chance in hell.
Can you believe that? It means if a woman can somehow convince a co-worker to force himself on her, or to “rape” her, that doesn’t count as cheating. It’s just another horrible thing that’s happened to poor defenseless her in this dog eat dog, man-world of rape happy abusers. That’s obviously a bunch of bullshit, but stand back because it gets worse.
Women also don’t count miring themselves in twisted, Dynasty-styled emotional affairs as cheating. For instance, a woman may hang around with as many as five or six of her ex-boyfriends without batting an eye. She may accept niceties from male co-workers or university staff members without ever questioning the motive of a free backrub. That’s a perfectly reasonable thing to be handing out, isn’t it? A free backrub? They’re like porno pamphlets in Vegas. Sometimes I can’t even get to work without getting two or three.
Bullshit.
Like any virus, women are not content with ruining their own lives. Ultimately, they seek out the lives of decent, honest men and tempt and corrupt them until they appear to be cheaters as well when nothing could be further from the truth. Cheating is like getting pregnant. It’s 100% a woman’s fault 100% of the time.
Related Articles:


















February 9th, 2006 at 3:17 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3249507be8fb8
Mech Pilot said:
I am glad to see I’ve gotten a serious debate going. Thank you Abandon I know that in my personal experiences I have found more women to be trustworthy than men, but that does limit my spectrum and it does make me buyist. Believe me I have been cheated on before by women so don’t get me wrong. You are very correct it is impossible to truly find which gender cheats more. There is no way to correctly survey the population.
-Agreed, personal experiences vary from person to person.
You may see the internet ads for porn and the articles about eating disorders. I see them as well, but I also have seen my male friends doing as many drunk girls as they can at one party, not because they want to, but because they feel they need to, to prove their “manliness” to be acceptedinto our culture.
-Ahh I see, The only rebuttal that you can come up with is some drunk guys having sex with drunk women, which is harmful to say the least however one has to wonder what is worse, selling your body over the internet completely sober(being a whore), or selling your body for as much money as you can get (destroying the institution of marriage and the trust between the sexes, not that there is much now anyways), or perhaps permanently damaging your body to look like a scarecrow (a strange form of self mutilation and perhaps selfishness) or getting drunk and fucking some girl at a party (big mistake but i’ll bet many people have made it at one time or another). Another point to be made here is while it is “considered” wrong to have sex with a drunk woman (or women), who in turn put themselves in that position in the first place (women) and who then in turn is responsible for the actions that happen afterwords (men)? Were the men as drunk as the women? Variables that to this point remain unanwsered.
I find that proving something to anothers expense is a horrible way to do things. I find that if you have to prove yourself you are obviously doing something wrong.
-Agreed, it only proves your insecurity it also shows your selfishness.
As for me being a “mangina”. I find that quite amusing really. I tend to find I am anything but typical and certainly not of the “mangina” sort. If you would explain to me exactly what a “mangina” is, then I might be able to get a better bearing on where you are coming from.
-To me a mangina is someone who swallows whole feminist propaganda, and can’t open their mouths to voice their postion because it is latched to the feminist teat.
Dick I never claimed to have all female friends. As for a Mech, go look it up like the “man” you are.
-I am paraphrasing here but a “Mech” is a large robot in a storyline that people use for warfare in the future, a Mech pilot is someone that pilots them.
February 9th, 2006 at 4:37 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3249507be8fb8
Mech Pilot said:
Abaddon trust me I have. I criticize both sides. Understanding is lost to both sides. It’s a worthless cause to try and make anyone see what they don’t want to.
-First and foremost, I apologize for my remark about you being a mangina. It was rude and inconsiderate. All I can really say to you is that I have read a lot of works on feminism, and much of it is hate inspired drivel. I have also tried to talking to “them” and its about as pointless as you can get.
February 10th, 2006 at 1:45 am - IP Man-Hash: 9ab12eae34b7e
I agree with you fully. But the same goes for the opposing side.
February 10th, 2006 at 7:37 am - IP Man-Hash: 281c250662a27
Mech,
Understanding is not necessarily lost on both sides. I would contend that understanding is less accepted on the Feminist side. I, however, do understand. I made a comment to Alison in another thread, “Now You’re Talking Double Team”, that sweeping generalizations cause undue prejudice. I fully understand that a radical stance such as “All women are cheating whores” may be construed as hateful. But the Feminist movement acheived what they have by shocking, radical statements such as “All men are rapists”. So I look at it as a kind of “true farce”. Some of the views and opinions catalogued in these pages have merit, the just expressed with the amplifier turned all the way up. Like the Feminist movement in reverse.
Mirroring the statements of other posters, thank you for engaging in intelligent discussion. Apologies for the hostility you encountered at first. I submit that if you click on yesterday’s date in a thread and get all the comments for yesterday, you’ll see that a lot of people posted inflammatory comments for the sole purpose of derailing the conversations and inciting malice. So my, and apparently some others’, mood was somewhat stand-off-ish. I am in some level of agreement with your post that it is worthless to try and make someone see what they don’t want, but I feel it is more that people have a right to their opinion. It doesn’t make it right, and just because you and I have differing opinions doesn’t mean that I have to make you see it my way or vice versa. I hate Howard Stern. I find him vile, repugnant and immoral. Do I call him or waste my effort to remove from the airwaves? No, I just change the channel.
February 10th, 2006 at 12:40 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9ab12eae34b7e
Alan,
Yes I first came across this site just as I have many other gender, race, or religion hating sites. I found it frustrating that people can have such an extreme view and complete disdain for someone over something such as gender. The gross generalizations that were here and the obvious prejudice made me come to the conclusion that understanding is lost to these men. But that in itself is a generalization that may not be true. For some to the men here it most certainly is true they will never give way to their stance and will never accept anything of any difference. But to others such as yourself you have shown that you still possess true wisdom and can accept anothers opinion without bashing it with hostile slander. So I posted in frustration, inevitably doing nothing. After I cleared my mind I realized why? Why am I doing this? all of these people are allowed their own opinions and just because mine are different does not mean they are correct. As you had said before life experience limits our spectrum of opinion as for me I have had some truly horrible experiences with women but I have also had some wonderful ones. I do sympathize with both sides I have been cheated on, ground into the dirt, humiliated openly in public and in front of my closest friends by women. But that has been a small percentage of the whole for me and worse has been done to me by men.
The hostility encountered was something to be expected I truly wasn’t welcome here. I also apologize for any hositility I may have expressed. It was not meant.
February 10th, 2006 at 1:38 pm - IP Man-Hash: 281c250662a27
Bravo Mech… Spoken like a true adult. And in an adult conversation, where logic and ration are present, we can see each others’ perceptions more openly than when hostility and sweeping generalizations are used. May I also say that you have also displayed genuine wisdom in grasping these points so quickly. Bravo Zulu.
February 14th, 2006 at 8:11 am - IP Man-Hash: 957564b4aff6d
Mech,
The reason men have to prove their manliness through sex is because they aren’t allowed any other way. Men used to prove their manliness through exploration, science, sports, hunting, literature, business - believe it or not, even marriage and fatherhood. Thanks to feminism, men have been harshly belittled for wanting to pursue masculine activities - in some cases, they’ve even had those masculine activities forcibly taken away from them (Title IX, anyone?). Feminists even raise their sons to be little girls - by teaching them that “compassion” and “playing nice with others” are the best virtues that they can have. Stripped of every true, manly virtue, what do you expect men to be, other than selfish predators?
February 14th, 2006 at 3:42 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5475964f1d333
I knew you were a sexist Arielle!!!!
February 14th, 2006 at 4:12 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5475964f1d333
I’m guessing your hubby didn’t get you much of anything yesterday. Poor thing. I was taken out to see my boyfriend Jake. Can I just say, Phwoar!!!!
February 14th, 2006 at 4:18 pm - IP Man-Hash: dc4b477cfd13b
I’m curious, Fem:
You’ve said that you think the world would be better without humans on it. You’ve said that the only reason that you don’t commit suicide so as to make the world better without your presence as a human is because it would hurt the feelings of those close to you. You’ve also said that you will not reproduce.
Why, then, do you have a boyfriend? It only encourages reproduction: I mean, whether you intend to reproduce or not probably has no bearing on you going through the motions, and birth control has been known to fail. Furthermore, you’re just letting someone get close to you when you’ve said that the only reason you don’t suicide is because you have people close to you.
It would seem to me that to be consistent with your stated positions, you should discourage friends of all stripes, particularly those who might get you pregnant by accident. If you discourage people from getting to know you, you’ll eventually have no loved ones to stop you from committing suicide in order to make the world a better place by eliminating one more human from it.
Or am I missing something that would make your behavior consistent with your stated positions?
February 14th, 2006 at 4:43 pm - IP Man-Hash: 957564b4aff6d
You assume far too much, Fem. Your qbservations are quite superficial.
February 14th, 2006 at 4:44 pm - IP Man-Hash: 957564b4aff6d
Bah. Observations.
February 15th, 2006 at 3:13 am - IP Man-Hash: bb6b5466d9bd7
These pro-rape attitudes on influential minds are dangerous
February 15th, 2006 at 8:11 am - IP Man-Hash: 7f5a0b2070dae
“particularly those who might get you pregnant by accident.”
The best population control is abortion. More than a couple late-term abortionists view the human race as a cancer on the planet. I suppose that assuages their guilt when they start sucking brains out of partially born infants, or extracting the fetus one limb at a time until they finally need to fish for the head.
That is later term abortion. I’m sure fem wouldn’t wait that long. She’d just have the kid vacuumed out or D&Ced in the first trimester.
Don’t concern yourself over the moral implications of the issue; it’s all for the greater good. We all know that the sacred ibex needs protecting.
February 15th, 2006 at 8:14 am - IP Man-Hash: 7f5a0b2070dae
If Arielle is a sexist, then sexism can’t be all that bad. I like my men manly.
March 8th, 2006 at 3:18 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4b1c0b41c6edd
i found this verry affencive i dont know wot ur motive was in making this website. you are making very general comments that are not true ok some women are the worst things in the world but that does not mean that they all are.men arent nesserily better than women and i believe that no one is better than anyone else no matter what people say i am sticking to my beliefs and some one like you arent going to change that if you were female what would you say to this website it should not be aloud through highschool restrictions and i believe that this may influence younger viewers i am looking forward to you reply.
March 8th, 2006 at 3:40 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
Me? I’m pretty sure I’ve never said anything that stupid. I am, after all, a man.
-Dick
March 8th, 2006 at 3:43 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
“Me”, I find your spelling and grammar very “affencive” (or offensive as the rest of us on the planet earth prefer to phrase it).
You’ve made a post in a forum where the last post was 3 weeks old. That’s generally viewed as poor manners. Let’s leave that aside, though.
There’s a reason why Dick phrases things as including “all” women — of course there are women exempt from Dick’s criticism — his mother for example.
The reason is this: to phrase it as “all” women means that every woman who hits this site must take a hard look at herself and say “Do I have any of this behaviour in me?”.
If she doesn’t, well and good. But that would be rather incredible. Far more likely for a woman to see “Yes, there’s a bit of that in me”.
“Me”, honestly, I’m not going to waste my time responding further to you unless you are prepared to do us the courtesy of using proper grammar, punctuation, and spelling. If you’ve further comments, I welcome them.
-wolfe
March 8th, 2006 at 10:21 pm - IP Man-Hash: a8b221859eaee
Rob said:
These pro-rape attitudes on influential minds are dangerous
-Where do you get this shit Rob? Where has anyone ever advocated “rape” on this site? Do you just spout off at the mouth when you find something that you cannot(or will not) agree with? Personally that sounds like a feminist one-liner to me. I could add a few more choicier examples of the hate that is feminism, however since this bullshit has been shoved down our throats for the past few decades I feel I dont have to do that.
March 8th, 2006 at 10:32 pm - IP Man-Hash: a8b221859eaee
Me said:
i found this verry affencive i dont know wot ur motive was in making this website. you are making very general comments that are not true ok some women are the worst things in the world but that does not mean that they all are.
-First, learn how to spell, and learn some general grammar as well. I have always said that hooked on phonics was the bane of the english language. As to the “general comments” feminists have been saying “general comments” about men that are far far worse than what is being said here, the only difference is that the feminists were lying. Nor has anyone said that all women are the worst things in the world, the basic premise of this website is that men are simply better than women.
men arent nesserily better than women and i believe that no one is better than anyone else no matter what people say i am sticking to my beliefs and some one like you arent going to change that if you were female what would you say to this website it should not be aloud through highschool restrictions and i believe that this may influence younger viewers i am looking forward to you reply.
-Well good for you, “me” why would I want to change your belief system? If I was a female, then I would really take a good hard look at myself and my friends and ask, are things really better now? Are people happier? Are things equal and if they are is that such a good thing? Are all things in nature equal or not? Ask yourself these questions. I certainly hope that this does influence younger men at least in the understanding of their gender. I hope that they learn to throw off the yoke that society has placed upon them and gain some measure of freedom.