Every Woman is a Cheating Whore
Oh yes, that’s right. That’s what I said. And I said it because it’s true. All women are cheaters.
I don’t mean this to be a provocateur or to prance around in the realm of the hypothetical like some kind of dandy. I mean, flat out, that every woman in the world is a cheater, has cheated, and is probably cheating at this very moment.
Getting a woman to cheat on her husband or significant other is not like getting a woman to go to the gym — by heaping shitloads of gifts and attention on her like a spoilt child and then ultimately getting no burn for your earn. Getting a woman to cheat is like getting a duck to eat bread crumbs or a rat to eat rubbish. All you have to do is toss it in front of their face.
It’s not a hard conclusion to draw, so let’s just look at the facts. Getting attention from men is a woman’s lifeblood. That’s why women worship men in the form of menial tasks that they’re not very good at — because men control our attention like the gods of old controlled the sun and the crypt. We giveth and we can taketh away.
Good attention, bad attention, the worst kind of attention; it doesn’t matter. To a woman, being in a Girls Gone Wild video is just as laudable as serving in a highly respected public office. They stack up eyeballs like empty pie plates at a NOW convention.
So let’s compare: a woman’s lust for attention versus a man’s desire to consume or waste things — something very manly indeed. Take throwing a sandwich in the street for example. Do you know what’s better than throwing a sandwich in the street? That’s right, throwing two sandwiches in the street. Now what if that sandwich cost twice as much as the first? What if you had to wait in line again to get it? I would probably still do it and I’m betting that most men would. But what if dealing with two sandwiches cost you your dignity, your job, and your soul?
Women, of course, have none of those things — or at least don’t have 2 out of 3. That’s why when we change ’sandwiches’ to ‘men’ and ‘throwing them in the street’ to ‘getting any kind of attention from them’, we can easily draw the conclusion that women would do anything, and would stop at the destruction of nothing, for more of it.
Not even guilt will stop women from being the cheating harlots that they are. That’s because women think that cheating requires some kind of expressed willingness or premeditation on their part to actually count. I shit you not, that is exactly what they say. To a woman true cheating requires a planning and malice on par with a bank robbery. If the only evidence of infidelity you can produce is that she got drunk and put herself in a compromising position, you’re up argument creek without a chance in hell.
Can you believe that? It means if a woman can somehow convince a co-worker to force himself on her, or to “rape” her, that doesn’t count as cheating. It’s just another horrible thing that’s happened to poor defenseless her in this dog eat dog, man-world of rape happy abusers. That’s obviously a bunch of bullshit, but stand back because it gets worse.
Women also don’t count miring themselves in twisted, Dynasty-styled emotional affairs as cheating. For instance, a woman may hang around with as many as five or six of her ex-boyfriends without batting an eye. She may accept niceties from male co-workers or university staff members without ever questioning the motive of a free backrub. That’s a perfectly reasonable thing to be handing out, isn’t it? A free backrub? They’re like porno pamphlets in Vegas. Sometimes I can’t even get to work without getting two or three.
Bullshit.
Like any virus, women are not content with ruining their own lives. Ultimately, they seek out the lives of decent, honest men and tempt and corrupt them until they appear to be cheaters as well when nothing could be further from the truth. Cheating is like getting pregnant. It’s 100% a woman’s fault 100% of the time.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 217 … 24 23 22 21 20 [19] 18 17 16 15 14 … 1 » Show All
No, that’s not what I said at all. Learn to read without projecting. The nuclear family involves compromises and a reduction of freedoms for all concerned that cause anyone to question the word ‘ideal’.
That said, I invite you to show me what’s closer to ideal for human beings. Please ensure that it’s got a similar track record of societal progress as the nuclear family backed societies can boast.
Don’t be silly. Again this isn’t what I say above and say elsewhere.
This is your most astute point. However, it is not precisely a market-driven culture that is responsible; rather, it is more probably mobility. Now, please explain why shattering the less-than ideal to replace it with something we know to be a disaster is an improvement.
Or are you of Walter Duranty’s views on cooking?
You are aware that simply proxying your IP won’t truly disguise you? Any 高手['high hand'] can track you unless you yourself are gosu with the net.
-wolfe
Told you you shouldn’t beat coin so much on the Man-hash. They’ll wise up to it, or maybe ask a man.
Actually, I haven’t a clue what you’re ip is. Perhaps md5sum incripted, perhaps smth. else. Anyway, I’ll just have a look at the geovisitors’ map and see if any little red flags cropped up in Brazil, French Guyana, The Land Down Under, Portugal or P. R. of China. Maybe that’s where that annoying panda’s posting from? Or maybe just using proxies from there.
So then your view is that what is ‘ideal’ is the nuclear family. Especially the family as a ‘mini govt’ enabling the Federal, state or local governments to abdicate any role in the actual governing or welfare of its citizens through transposing that authority to the family. This might all be well and good, if we take the point you were trying to make through your comment below, as factually correct in this day and age.
Yes, the nuclear family ideal would work well if there was still linkages from it to other extended family networks, however, in individualist, market driven cultures, what tends to happen is that the nuclear becomes isolated and alienated. Family rule then dominates and if the head of the family happens to be an oppressor, then it’s suffer the tyranny for the other members. I am not trying to say that the head might necessarily be a man, I acknowledge that in many famiies, an oppressor may be a woman.
By the way, do you like my IP man hash? Thought so.
All hail the return of the Man Hash! Heck you probably did all 3 at the same time — tag buttons, IP man hash, geovistors, with enough spare manjo to compose an opera in your head were you so inclined.
Luka: not condescending. My reply was written though so that both new and old visitors could readily grasp it. The problem with charges like the ones you make is that they do pop up in search engines, and tend to become link magnets for some. Also, subtle or not (that’s my vote), Dick Masterson is a name worth saying to oneself a few times.
-wolfe
I’m a man. I did them both at the same time.
-Dick
Nice one Dick. The geovisitors feature, I mean. And I see you got the ip Man-hash feature up and running again too. Kudos.
When a man is “condesending” you, as a woman it means you fucked up.
-Dick
Wolfe said,
And that seems rather silly to me. Come on. The site’s author is Dick Masterson. Just say that name again to yourself a few times.
Please don’t condesend me Wolfe. I am not stupid, I do understand the humour of this site and I have noted the subtly. That said, I do see your point.
Quite the contrary. I think it’s rather frightening when policies become linked to a neo-marxist deconstructivist view of humans as rabid individualists selfishly competing in a vicious zero-sum game that destroys jobs, wealth, families, and people.
We know the ‘nuclear family’ for all its faults works reasonably well at raising sane happy humans. We’re getting a clearer and clearer picture of what the alternatives do, and they aren’t pretty. Welcome, Huxley and Orwell.
-wolfe
Christianj, I have been reading your posts and checked out your newsletter on-line. Let me ask you something, what exactly is your ‘ideal’ picture of how a woman should be? And what role, if any, do you think you as a man have, in influencing or allowing women to be this ‘ideal’ if at all feasible.
I am just thinking here that you can’t just click your fingers and make something happen, nor can you say to women, “be like this or else,” or do you disagree?
Do you think women should just be told what to do and how to be? Or do you think that lobbying govt. to make govt payments in all areas - parenting payments/disability pensions/youth allowance means tested on a FAMILY income is the way to go. I mean, that way, children and women do become locked into the family don’t they. Even if a child has abusive parents and wants to leave home, they can’t really access welfare payments because in order to fill out the form they need to get their parents to fill out those parts relevant to parental income if the allowance is means tested on it. Don’t you think it’s a bit scary when policies become linked to a stereotypic ideal of the ‘nuclear family.’
You make a very excellent point here, Oldone, I agree that MABTW does provide this as a service to men, this is a positive thing.
I am still concerned though, for the more vulnerable young men that might take this site far too seriously or miss the humour and not understand the distinction between ‘letting off steam’ and a real means to gain understanding and insight of women.
If this was wriiten or excisted last year, every effort would have been pursued by the feminiazies to have this site erased as they have with at least 6 men’s sites and forums that I am aware of.
Women do not like criticism, but they don’t mind handing it out on a regular basis.
Any criticism about women on the web was to be destroyed or screamed down as often as possible. Feminists have lost that power but only through the perseverance of MRA’s and our sheer determination to expose feminists and women for what they have become.
But we still have women on here denying that any problem excist, believe that the “priviledged princess” deserves her whoring money and that all males should pay just for the presence of the opposite sex.
This site does both, succinctly explains why the title of this site is correct and also where men stand at this moment on this planet. Our space has been invaded and we are basically sick to death of it.
It’s about time women were told, load and clear.
When completely annoyed they send you outrageously offensive emails. I’ll see if I can scrounge up a few of Female’s greats and post them in the forums. She’s really quite a cow.
-Dick
In a way this is a very revealing statement. I certainly started to have a good idea of what being mocked by gender was like as soon as I could watch TV. TV Dad’s are invariably portrayed (in commercials; often on the programs themselves) as bumbling idiots: Mom comes in and fixes everything.
Was this being mocked by gender? To some degree, sure. Going to school as a little kid — and it’s only gotten worse since then as far as I can tell — almost all teachers were female, and some showed some quite blatant bias. It got ridiculous and really quite bad by University. Without doubt, that was mockery by gender and from some self-styled progressive liberal thinkers.
Fortunately, in my case, I was fairly well insulated from it, having elected to study in an intellectually demanding field with miniscule female enrolment. But most men aren’t, unless they start eschewing higher education.
I had a brilliant friend who dropped out of law school [admittedly he made a horrible error in going to a prestigious but insane feminist-run school] because he couldn’t take the constant drumbeat of negativity that he as a man was a rapist, that he as a white man was a racist, etc.
And that seems rather silly to me. Come on. The site’s author is Dick Masterson. Just say that name again to yourself a few times.
The very name of the site is a glorious yet outlandish challenge to the orthodox wisdom of the age. It’s written large, wonderfully large for all to see. To suggest that someone would miss the multifaceted nature of this site is to suggest that someone has someone has no sense of humor or can’t read. By observation, these appear, in the early 21st century, to be qualities notable more by lack than by possession primarily in the distaff.
-wolfe
“Poor naive child.”
“Sweet young thing.”
“Poor thing.”
blablabla
Yet another clue :)
Carmen and Female seem to share the same annoying, unwarranted, unjustified condescendence when only mildly annoyed.
yeah, i noticed the ip hashes don’t show up anymore. sigh…
Ah, Billi, Dick will have to get the IP-Man Hash reinstalled with v2.
-wolfe
This site is entirely sexist and pathetic. You all sicken me. There’s a lot of smart women, why else would we make such a big fuss about them? It’s more like they control us with their sexual ways and we just pretend we’re the dominant ones. You all must be gay.
Luka, the difference between the online and the real world is that no man will listen to three pages of your bullshit without being able to stare at your chest.
-Dick
You make a very excellent point here, Oldone, I agree that MABTW does provide this as a service to men, this is a positive thing.
I am still concerned though, for the more vulnerable young men that might take this site far too seriously or miss the humour and not understand the distinction between ‘letting off steam’ and a real means to gain understanding and insight of women. I guess this could be said for any message, no matter how well intentioned or written - there is always a means for the human mind to twist a good, well written idea to fit a really disturbed version of reality - it’s the same kind of lame argument that links violence to computer games, I know, but you cannot blame me for having that concern, can you?
I swear the relationship between me and incompetent is a love-hate one because sometimes I type it and I spell it incompetant and at other times I write incompetent, I am a quick touch-typist so I know I could lie and say it was a typo - which would be plausible, but the truth is, I haven’t a bloody clue how to spell it so I try both spellings just in case LMAO!