I Want To Be A Crack Whore When I Grow Up!
We all know that men are better than women at everything; I’ve discussed and proved many reasons why on this site. Men are stronger. Men are smarter. Men are able to put their thoughts into words in order to communicate whereas women can’t mentally hold onto anything that isn’t sparkly or fluffy.
It’s true. Men are the super adhesive man-glue that holds society together by the seat of its ass, and women are that crappy sticky strip that holds Post It notes on your computer screen. They won’t stick to anything and goddamn if you’ll ever get that strip of gummy residue off your monitor, but at least you remembered Carole’s bullshit birthday party is in the lunchroom in 5 minutes. Fantastic.
In the past, I may have been a little hard on women. Sure, it’s easy to say that they’ll never achieve on par with a man or have as much of an impact on history because of science and genetics. That’s obvious. Women have tiny woman brains that are soaked in “crazy juice” (estrogen or some such thing — some kind of feminine hormone) like a big fat sponge at a big fat car wash. But that’s not a robust explanation. Not robust at all.
Only half of women’s ineptituderies can be blamed on their second rate biology. Let’s hypothesize now that the other half of the gold brick is a woman’s attitude. Her shitty, piss-poor attitude. Her attitude of backstabbing, undercutting, and most importantly bar lowering. And here I’m talking about role models.
Remember back when you were 25 and you thought of how much better you could make the world if you were Batman? Or maybe even further back. How about Steve McQueen or James Bond or O.J. Simpson…Indiana Jones? My point is that the heroes and role models of men are the spring boards to their success. They are the whip master of the conscience and a lifelong commitment. Men and young men have always looked to the heroes of history and cinema and thought to themselves, “Boy I sure want to emulate that guy and thereby increase the global quality of life.” And you know what? It works. It works.
That’s where women come in. Right when everything’s looking great. First of all, try to even come up with a female role model. Give it some real thought.
Sigourney Weaver from Alien? Yea, that’s about all I could come up with too. And, as we all know, that part was written for a man. Imagine how great that movie would have been as a Writer’s Cut. Let me give some alarming answers that I received from women of all ages when I asked them to participate in the very same thought experiment.
1. Paris Hilton
2. Tara reid
3. Princess Di
4. Their mother
Promiscuous sex and drunken debauchery does not a role model make — unless you’re a woman apparently. I swear, women set the bar so low that they’d have to dig a grave themselves just to fail. Who’s the grave for you ask? Chivalry — or grace, I don’t know. Throw the whole shit in there it’s all big cluster fuck anyway.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 21 … 19 18 17 16 15 [14] 13 12 11 10 9 … 1 » Show All
I’m convinced now that Clair is a teenager, emotionally stunted with man-hate driven into her soul from her mom or sister, or some other angry women in her life.
Now I sort of pity her…
Claire, it’s common knowledge women have the right to work wherever they want as long as they have the dinner ready when you get home.
Slamdunk…again!!! Huge Manpoints to Doubt.
Maybe its because the women like yourself never leave?
That’s because you’ve confused a forum - where everyone can see what you’ve written - with email correspondence. Speaking of which, perhaps the little ladies could try that sometime and stop spamming up the forum.
That’s alright, though, you have cleavage, you can use a man to compensate with your technological ineptitude - and then not put out afterwards. Because you’re only a slut if you actually engage in the sexual act, but a man can be a pervert/freak for oh-so-much less than that.
Now run along, little miss. It’s time for man-talk now.
Doubt, you keep saying it’s time for man-talk but I never see you talking to anyone here except the women…
Clair, you little girls seem unable to form a coherent argument - you just put forth a few hasty conclusions about why men are inferior, equal, whatever, and call us gay for ‘not doing anything for you when you look sullen.’
Real men do not let little girls use and manipulate them - there, I solved this little debate - I’m right, you’re wrong. And I fail to see how what you think my superficial appearance is enters into this. The whole pay for sex thing - no one’s putting a gun to my head and forcing me to pay the ‘dancers.’ When no one tips, they feel insecure and drink/snort (who gives a shit, they get loose). When they feel insecure, anyone gets pussy. So apparently you do not have to ‘follow the rules,’ if you will, to get a piece of that ass. And seeing as how girls have stopped holding up their end of the deal, I fail to see how it is dishonorable to do the same.
We also observe that all of those boyfriends you talk about - the real ones, not the hypothetical ones - seem to be sterling examples of men who get a piece of that ass and do not have to act like pussies to do so. He does not even have to come up with excuses why you chose not to orgasm and he keeps getting a grab at them big-ass titties - now that’s a deal. It’s difficult to explain to girls how I am an inferior ‘faggot’ who will pay for their dinner and if they happen to be ‘in the mood’ and aren’t worried that they’ll ‘feel like a slut’ then they might put out. Or I could embrace my brutish male nature and exploit them in the same way they have exploited themselves.
I’d hate not to live up to your expectations, sugar-tits.
Now it’s time for man talk, short-cakes, so we’re going to have to ask you to leave.
Maybe the reason you will never orgasm is because you see sex as a tool to use and manipulate men.
I would also like to rephrase what many of the stupid, shallow little whores here have said: if you hate men so much, fuck dykes. There’s no need to go around giving men herpes and then filing false rape charges against them cuz they deserv it anywayz.
But yes, as long as you use sex to attract men - wear a halter-top, wear slutty clothes like most girls your age, you can expect men to value you for exactly and only that.
It’s your fault, slut, that men only see you for a wet hole and a bloated chest. You exploit your sexuality so often that you have never picked up the talent, social skills, or emotional maturity required to be an individual and a productive member of society. Hence, you enjoy the victim-feminist enforced double-standard 4 gurlz only, and ‘empower’ yourself by using sex to compensate for your own shortcomings.
I assure you, if any of you little girls were judged by the male half of the double-standard, you would be laughed at, ridiculed, literally - not emotionally - alone, and ostracized. Just because men step up to their responsibilities in society, and as a result develop into better people than petty little victim feminists, is no reason to drag them down to a girl’s level. If you do not respect men, they will not respect you.
And, of course, you will need to be deserving of respect. Men do not get a free ride in society, and if you take the whore’s route and use your gender to get ahead, you will be seen as a bloated chest and a wet hole.
But then you’re probably too busy fabricating awkward and long-winded excuses for what you have imposed upon yourself to think about that.
Good point Clair. But coming from a guy, you need to shut the hell up and do it.
But you said, “But this bs of you have to have tons of foreplay each and every time bores men. Sometimes you need to shut the hell up and do it without all of that.”
“Women need to tell men what they need more of.” They do, hence the foreplay debate.
No, I said most men are bored by sex always being all about the woman. Sex should not be all about a woman because she might have trouble with having one.
Women need to tell men what they need more of. Women on the other hand need to extend the same courtesy. This constant badgering makes it sound like most men suck in bed, and women naturally know what their doing.
A man having an orgasm does not mean she’s any good at it.
Yes, because as a woman, I know nothing about MYSELF, I learn everything about ME from some weight fluctuating t.v personality. As a woman, surrounded by women, you learn a thing or two about the female species. Do you have any idea of the amount of teenage girls that have sex with their boyfriend just to keep him happy so he wont leave? Cause their are LOTS, and the sad thing is, this is the foundation for their future relationships.
I don’t think women have a problem about saying that they like sex, I mean…just take a look at any womans magazine. It’s either about how to get good sex, have good sex, have even better sex or learn how to make their man happier in bed.
Thats good that most men don’t have a problem with foreplay, other then the fact that you said that most men are bored by it, which indicates a problem.
If you think it’s ALL about women, maybe thats because most women have never, and probably never will, orgasm during sex. Most women’s first orgasm is achieved by themselves, even AFTER being sexually active. It seems to me that women seem to like fore play because it heightens their chance of orgasming or at least makes up for the fact for lack there of.
Would you always be willing to have sex and no foreplay? Your assertion that women have sex for closeness is laughable. More often than not they just have it for the same reason we do.
You can forget that garbage you heard on Oprah. That’s just a cover because women feel like whores for admitting they like sex.
Most men have no problem with foreplay. What they do have a problem with is everything is always about her and for her. What about us?
“…But this bs of you have to have tons of foreplay each and every time bores men.”
Hmm, do you think you would be willing to just have foreplay and no sex after woods? Because thats the equivalent of what your saying.
Just so you know though, some women along with some men, actually psychologically need foreplay. Other wise they feel as though they have been used for their body, and they begin to degrade psychologically and emotionally. Any human with the empathy would try to avoid this.
“You know without sex their is no other logical reason we would deal with you.”
Why don’t you turn gay then? You’d get to be around men, and not women. Or just take care of business on your own. I mean, you obviously have to emotional attachment to sex, but the reason you would (presumably) have sex, would be to achieve orgasm, correct? Why get with annoying bitches that you hate and don’t live up to your standards when you could either get with men that understand you, or just get what you want by yourself?
I’m not saying sex should be on demand. But if you know you can’t or are not going to, then don’t get married.
A man should not always have to cater to a woman before sex. That’s always what we hear. It’s about what two people wan’t not one. Making her feel special often times I can see. But this bs of you have to have tons of foreplay each and every time bores men. Sometimes you need to shut the hell up and do it without all of that.
Women think a man should meet their emotional needs before sex. Can’t we use the same logic and say you need to meet our physical needs, before we meet your emotional ones?
Yes, not having sex with your spouse is a divorcable thing. It is one of your spousal duties. Just like talking to one another about your problems. You know without sex their is no other logical reason we would deal with you.
I never said a woman shouldn’t cook you dumb asses. I said she shouldn’t be expected to do something based purely on the grounds that she is female. The same is applicable for men. THAT is sexism at it’s finest.
sonyad, there is nothing wrong with “malgamating exquisite culinary treats for the man (persons) you (supposedly) love”. I never said there was.
Oh and Billy….I wasn’t “pretending” that women shouldn’t have to cook or make a pleasant home, because they DON’T. I would ask you how real women act, but I’m not going to as I’m expecting a chauvinistic answer, however, if I’m wrong, please do enlighten me.
“Clair explain how a woman making a good home is problematic?”
It’s not. If thats what she wants then thats fine. However if she says “No, I don’t want to be a homemaker, I want to enter the work force.” Then she shouldn’t be expected to still maintain the home. If the man isn’t working, then he should take care of the home. If he is working, then it’s equal work. Or however the couple decide is the best solution.
“Men work on average 12-15 hours less a week out of the home. What do you think should happen? He works more out of the home and then you split the household duties equally?”
No, if he’s working longer hours, and depending on what kind of job each partner has.
“As far as sex get real. If it wasn’t for that one thing men wouldn’t bother with women. Seriously. We don’t care about your problems or supporting you.”
Thats why feminism came about, and as long as you keep acting this way and thinking this way, it will never leave.
“Men shouldn’t have to do nice things to get some. Just like you shouldn’t have to blow some guy to get him to treat you with some respect. It works both ways.”
Sex is a very personal thing, and for some people, spiritual. Now, I’m aware some people are completely emotionally detached from sex, however their are those who are. For these people it is a very meaningful and spiritual thing that only bonds you further as a couple. No one has any form of sexual right over YOUR body. If you don’t feel like it, then don’t do it. It’s YOUR prerogative. There-fore if you wish to engage in this activity with another person, you should show them that you have a certain amount of respect for them first, that you value them, and if you are lucky the person that you love might begin to share mutual feelings and wish to engage in this act with you.
“Sex is a requirement for marriage. In fact it’s a divocable thing. I believe its called not fullfilling your matrimonial duties.”
Anyone that divorces you for something like that, didn’t deserve you in the first place.
It’s their false feminist inspired pride. They’re too proud to do a “menial” job like cooking for their “husband”.
Yet another Marital duty they choose to subvert when it suits them. Soon they’ll have nothing to offer.
I wouldn’t mind cooking for my hypothetical wife as the odd exception to the rule.
Most certainly, the man should also reign over the barbeque, for sure.
But what’s so revolting about amalgamating exquisite culinary treats for the man (persons) you (supposedly) love?
I really don’t see what’s with all the feminist stigma about. Unless you’re some fugly feminist butch battleaxe hag that sees marriage as subservience akin to slavery.
Which you’ll still longingly regret after when the years have sought you into old age and you’re microwaving some cat food for your politcally correct spouse.
By the way Clair it was meant to say more instead of less.
Clair explain how a woman making a good home is problematic? Men work on average 12-15 hours less a week out of the home. What do you think should happen? He works more out of the home and then you split the household duties equally?
As far as sex get real. If it wasn’t for that one thing men wouldn’t bother with women. Seriously. We don’t care about your problems or supporting you.
Men shouldn’t have to do nice things to get some. Just like you shouldn’t have to blow some guy to get him to treat you with some respect. It works both ways.
Sex is a requirement for marriage. In fact it’s a divocable thing. I believe its called not fullfilling your matrimonial duties.