I Want To Be A Crack Whore When I Grow Up!
We all know that men are better than women at everything; I’ve discussed and proved many reasons why on this site. Men are stronger. Men are smarter. Men are able to put their thoughts into words in order to communicate whereas women can’t mentally hold onto anything that isn’t sparkly or fluffy.
It’s true. Men are the super adhesive man-glue that holds society together by the seat of its ass, and women are that crappy sticky strip that holds Post It notes on your computer screen. They won’t stick to anything and goddamn if you’ll ever get that strip of gummy residue off your monitor, but at least you remembered Carole’s bullshit birthday party is in the lunchroom in 5 minutes. Fantastic.
In the past, I may have been a little hard on women. Sure, it’s easy to say that they’ll never achieve on par with a man or have as much of an impact on history because of science and genetics. That’s obvious. Women have tiny woman brains that are soaked in “crazy juice” (estrogen or some such thing — some kind of feminine hormone) like a big fat sponge at a big fat car wash. But that’s not a robust explanation. Not robust at all.
Only half of women’s ineptituderies can be blamed on their second rate biology. Let’s hypothesize now that the other half of the gold brick is a woman’s attitude. Her shitty, piss-poor attitude. Her attitude of backstabbing, undercutting, and most importantly bar lowering. And here I’m talking about role models.
Remember back when you were 25 and you thought of how much better you could make the world if you were Batman? Or maybe even further back. How about Steve McQueen or James Bond or O.J. Simpson…Indiana Jones? My point is that the heroes and role models of men are the spring boards to their success. They are the whip master of the conscience and a lifelong commitment. Men and young men have always looked to the heroes of history and cinema and thought to themselves, “Boy I sure want to emulate that guy and thereby increase the global quality of life.” And you know what? It works. It works.
That’s where women come in. Right when everything’s looking great. First of all, try to even come up with a female role model. Give it some real thought.
Sigourney Weaver from Alien? Yea, that’s about all I could come up with too. And, as we all know, that part was written for a man. Imagine how great that movie would have been as a Writer’s Cut. Let me give some alarming answers that I received from women of all ages when I asked them to participate in the very same thought experiment.
1. Paris Hilton
2. Tara reid
3. Princess Di
4. Their mother
Promiscuous sex and drunken debauchery does not a role model make — unless you’re a woman apparently. I swear, women set the bar so low that they’d have to dig a grave themselves just to fail. Who’s the grave for you ask? Chivalry — or grace, I don’t know. Throw the whole shit in there it’s all big cluster fuck anyway.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 21 … 14 13 12 11 10 [9] 8 7 6 5 4 … 1 » Show All
My kids from age 1 - 5 won’t be.
After that.. she gets a job… then we share the responsibilities of housework.
But if your kids are going to school, and she spends some hours cooking and cleaning each day, then she still has loads of time left with nothing to do.
Tending to my babies and making sure my supper is on the table for when I come home after working my ass off to provide money for my family.
And she damn well not be talking her ass off about her problems when I come in the door… I don’t give a shit if Susan said your drapes look drab.
Well, the wife will be home alone for 7-8 hours during weekdays. And as you said, with the new technology, housework takes a lot less time to do. So how do you actually suggest they fill up that time?
If the women stays at home she should turn Oprah and soaps off and do the housework, work on her appearance and work on staying fit.. Grow a garden.. Make things for the home. Do some damn work at home and then prepare a nice evening for her and the hubby when he gets home now and then.
It couldn’t be any more easier than that.
The point was many housewives are lazy assed couch sitters.
Sitting on your fat ass and being a pain in your husband butt when he gets home is what many owmen are like. Idol hands is the devils workshop. If you watch soaps all day then you going to disappoint your huband by doing nothing or geting the urge to go screw someone else.
Too many women claim they got bored and they screw around… It’s
their own damn fault. Because women are boring is no excuse.
Whether you believe in the bible or not..
Get one and read Proverbs chapter 31.
And see what blessed women is.
A foolish women tears down her house.
That is over 70% of Western women today.
Because of men’s inventions of dishwasher and laundry machines and cable TV and internet banking.. women have very little to do anymore at home.
They should all be concentrating on raising the man’s children and teaching them right from wrong.. not teaching them how much attention mom’s new fake tits got at the mall while shopping for ugg boots.
word?
can I get a hell ya?
ya.. I thought so.
If the women stays at home she should turn Oprah and soaps off and do the housework, work on her appearance and work on staying fit.. Grow a garden.. Make things for the home. Do some damn work at home and then prepare a nice evening for her and the hubby when he gets home now and then.
It couldn’t be any more easier than that.
The point was many housewives are lazy assed couch sitters.
Sitting on your fat ass and being a pain in your husband butt when he gets home is what many owmen are like. Idol hands is the devils workshop. If you watch soaps all day then you going to disappoint your huband by doing nothing or geting the urge to go screw someone else.
Too many women claim they got bored and they screw around… It’s
their own damn fault. Because women are boring is no excuse.
Whether you believe in the bible or not..
Get one and read Proverbs chapter 31.
And see what blessed women is.
A foolish women tears down her house.
That is over 70% of Western women today.
0618265724
“As to your second point, what’s illogical between criticising somebody for doing nothing properly or something half-assedly?”
But those are generally the only two options; to stay home or work outside the home (and, by the way, many women work outside the home competently). Women are criticized for doing either. Which do the men on this site want? What exactly is the standard you want women to meet?
Of course they are fugly untouchable man haters. We should start our own white feather campaign and True Feminuts should be the first to get one. And for equality sake no job behind the lines.
Give her a rifle and an all female platoon and leave them in heart of the action and shoot them if she runs away. That would be equality.
What else could she possibly have been thinking of? She could have any used of a number of colloquial alternatives. It doesn’t really
She chose what she did. But was only speaking metaphorically, subtly invoking imagery. They can’t all overtly showcase their longing for their very own Bobbit moment. Plausibly deniability must be maintained.
Otherwise, God forbid, sane people (well, men at least) would see them for the shriveled up, pristinely untouched fugly man haters they really are.
This latter part, written in finer print, no bold caps, is presumably addressing mothers of men of ‘eligible’ age.
- Paul Oakenfold - Southern Sun (ft. Carla Werner)
@TrueFeminist: Precisely how do you define equality? As equality of opportunity, or equality of outcome?
@Sony Good link. I knew of the white feather of course, but I’d never seen those quotes. I found the personal ad in the Times particularly striking. “I shall cut you dead”. Figure of speech to be sure, but one wonders what the lady was thinking when she chose those words.
-wolfe
Perhaps also the ‘order’ of the white feather is lost on you in your blissful and convenient ignorance.
- Paul Oakenfold - Southern Sun (ft. Carla Werner)
Very logical, in fact. But I suppose the difference between male only mandatory conscript service or shaming thereto and voluntary, professional military service is lost on you.
As to your second point, what’s illogical between criticising somebody for doing nothing properly or something half-assedly?
- Paul Oakenfold - Southern Sun (ft. Carla Werner)
In ‘angryharrys’ website he says it was men who were opressed in the early 20th centuary because women did not have to fight, but also critisises any notion that women should be allowed to fight today.
How is this logical?
Dick critisises women who stay at home and do fuck all for being lazy, but also laughs at women in the workplace.
How is this logical?
TrueFeminist you wouldn’t know logic if we rubbed it in your faced.
Logic now that is a manly word.
You really shouldn’t talk about things that you know nothing about!
Although you could talk about nasty cunts since you got one. But we would prefer you didn’t and you just left this site like the other cunts.
NO WOMEN ALLOWED
Funny. That’s what you’re doing.
This ‘angryharry’ ignors the statistics which prove him wrong and promotes those that do not, he cannot have it both ways.
For example, in his website he says it was men who were opressed in the early 20th centuary because women did not have to fight, but also critisises any notion that women should be allowed to fight today.
His problem is he doesnt know what he wants out of women, nobody on this website seems to. It is only critisims of the lifestyle choices we make without suggesting an alternative. Dick critisises women who stay at home and do fuck all for being lazy, but also laughs at women in the workplace. What does he want? What do any of you want? Do you even know?
“You only have one flaw; you’re a woman. Your countless other shortcomings are all emcompassed under your gender classification.�
I will NOT apologise for being a woman. Do not pretend you know me, my comments on this website have been two sided and fair, never personally critisising any men and I am met only with this bullshit. I attempt to discuss you’re beliefs with logic, but whilst you argue against anything I say (even when agreeing with you- absurdley) you cannot have a logical debate. Do you hate women? Why? I could never apply the word hate to so broad a demographic, its absurd. You have not met the majority of women and so have no right to judge us all.
Ah yes, the ultimate comback, ignoring any logic and actual argument in my comment and responding with a personal insult, way to show off male superiority.
Men and women are equal, you get stupid women but olny as many as there are men.
I will re-post my comment and see if you can be a good little boy and figure out why it is ‘angryharry’ feels the need to manipulate statistics and ignor facts.
Who are the fuck are you to determine Harry has some kind of problem?
The real problem is you are a raging lunatic and have poor reading comprehension. No we don’t have time to explain his articles to you. Women like you should be kept in cages.