The F Word
The F word today is Feminism — not fuck like it is usually.
It seems that on the topic of men being better than women eventually the topic of feminism should be covered.
Although I don’t really see why.
Since no one gives a shit about it.
Instead of summing up The Feminism, Feminists, or the Feminist Movement in any way shape or form, I’m just going to let the experts do it for you.
Point your browser over to feministing.com, a harem of horn trumpeting and the slandering of nonsense the likes of which I have never seen before. It’s as if someone has hot-boxed horseshit hysteria. Remember that one short-lived game on American Gladiator, where the contestants and the gladiators would bounce from platforms on bungee cords, with a frantic and desperate mania, to stick Velcro balls to a suspended pole in the middle of an arena? Of course you remember it you’re a man and every episode of that show was man-tasticly great. Feministing.com is a lot like that game. Except instead of contenders, gladiators, and balls; there are only women and their lust for getting outraged as quickly and as often as possible about absolutely any news story that has to do with men, women, or gender. The frantic and desperate mania is quite the same.
Since only men are allowed to read this, I can guarantee what the first thing that catches your eyes on that page will be, and that is the giant picture of the braless woman on the right hand column of the page with her nipples sticking through her shirt.
Let me repeat that.
With her braless nipples sticking through her shirt.
Interesting.
That’s a very interesting thing to see on a site whose sole purpose is to counter that exact kind of female empowerment (read exploitation). It’s so interesting that one might even call it not interesting at all, typical, and complete bullshit hypocrisy.
Far be it from me to tell someone how to run a business — which feminism definitely is, just as much as is Nike Jogging Wear for women. The picture is an ad to sell T-shirts. That’s fine. Everyone knows attractive women sell the goods as well as their goods (while still not being as good as men at doing so). Women see that ad and immediately lust for her braless attention like rabid wolves, frothing at the mouth for their chance to casually tread the line between “taken seriously” and “woops”.
Put your hard helmets on, ladies. Your integrity is dropping like flies as Girl Power strikes again.
Addendum:
If you would like to see what feminists have to say about this site, click here.
Related Articles:
September 1st, 2006 at 11:29 pm - IP Man-Hash: 620fd0d0b9273
Well it seems much of the issues being contended have been resolved.
One thing:
“Possibly the strongest reason I was so anti and challenging was because I have been raised as a girl, and suffered for years due to the ‘men-are-better-than-women’ attitudes.�
“How utterly bizarre. Please note: I am not implying that is wrong, given your condition, merely highly unusual; strange, and very difficult to fathom.”
This is not, unfortunately, unusual at all. Almost all intersexed people have their gender ‘chosen’ for them, and are raised as the parents/doctor decides. It is the commonest thing (now that the practice of culling such ‘abominations’ has been made illegal) when a child presents with traits of both genders. Thankfully, I was not one of those unfortunate children who had their genitals mutilated in order to conform them, forcibly, to one gender, as doctors are wont to do when dealing with an intersexed child.
If any of you are interested in learning more on this subject, then you should Google ‘intersexed.’
It’s a whole universe of ‘abominations’ out there.
“Exceptionally good (and bad) men are far more common than exceptionally good (or bad) women.”
That may be true in a few senses, in others it is not. It is tue that women seem to stick to the middle ground in general where it comes to IQ testing and other areas of life, whereas men are more likely to either be exceptional or the other end of the scale. (I hope you understand what I mean, it’s merely agreeing with some of what you have already noticed.) I was generalising and mainly referring to the fact that I have known more exceptional women than men. That’s why I started that sentence with “In my experience.” And I have known psychopaths of both genders.
I have had a thought on one possible reason why so few women strive to achieve as much as those men who strive after their goals… It is only one reason of many, but plausible at the least: They do not have to.
Then again the men don’t either, many of them simply choose to, but I’m referring to that attitude that is held by both many men and many women… The ‘wow’ factor when a woman rises to power or to achieve something other women have not. Given that women hve yet to make the fullest and most positive of their post-women’s lib freedom, so to speak. Bear with me, I am having trouble getting my point across.
Ok, example: The ‘wow’ factor.
The rarity of women/girls playing violent online games demonstrates the ‘wow’ factor, because when a girl does play them, she will go around the servers repeating ‘I am a girl’ to anyone who will listen, and everyone is suitably impressed that a female is playing this bloody game. It annoys the shit out of me, mainly because those women are being attention whores and making all women look bad… They are not being praised for their score, or for being great players, but rather for the fact that they are there at all. Because almost invariably their scores are down the bottom.
It is embarrassing for all womankind when a shitty player makes such a fuss out of her gender. But because so few girls play that genre of game in particular, the girl in question is praised and has her ass kissed simply for getting onto the server. Hence, the ‘wow’ factor. And while being an attention whore she gives the almost exclusively male gameing community the idea that all women are shit players.
It’s ridiculous, but having said that, there are a few exceptional female players who do not go around embarrassing the female species in general.
But there’s my demonstration of the ‘wow’ factor. As for the name… I’ll change it when I think of something more suitable.
By the way I live in queensland, and even among other Australians Queenslanders are held in contempt for being slow-witted. Oddly enough. I just moved here, in my defense. Thanks wolfe once again, and peace to you all.
September 2nd, 2006 at 11:30 am - IP Man-Hash: 8c4da32f89afb
11
Its prime.
September 2nd, 2006 at 12:19 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
It’s gender, by biz’s reading comprehension.
Yes, it’s different through having the property of being prime. The other 2 aren’t. It’s also primarily different through a lack of a property the other 2 share. It’s the only one that can’t be obtained through raising an integer to itself.
September 2nd, 2006 at 1:50 pm - IP Man-Hash: 620fd0d0b9273
……
Numbers? Sorry, I thought that sonyad was referring to my post, judging by the fact that he addressed his post to me, and I had assumed (wrongly) that it had some relation to the subject being discussed (which was gender-related.)
We were not discussing math.
As I have stated many times, the whole I-am-a-genius sentence was in order to show that just because a test says you are a genius does not mean that you are.
But apparently a few of you cannot read past a few sentences and so here I am, repeating the same disclaimer/explanation, over and over and OVER… Please read the whole post if you wish to answer and demand a reply at the same time. I was not… repeat NOT… discussing math. That was completely beside the point. Please quote me where I claimed to be a whiz with numbers. Where?
Oh, wait… I didn’t.
Now, for once and for all, please try to remember, I WAS POINTING OUT THAT IF EVEN I CAN GET A CERTIFICATE LABELLING ME A GENIUS, THEN SURELY THE TESTING SYSTEM IS NOT 100% ACCURATE, AND THEREFORE NOT TO BE TAKEN AS A BE-ALL AND END-ALL.
This was in response to the ‘IQ tests say men are smarted in general’ post.
It was a random example. But some of you seem to have taken it rather personally.
For future reference, please read my post from beginning to end, as I have the courtesy (and/or attention span) to pay full attention to yours, before deigning to reply.
Otherwise we would all sound like idiots.
Respect, and thank you for solving that puzzle for whatsisname.
Peace.
September 2nd, 2006 at 1:56 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
run cmd shutdown -s
September 2nd, 2006 at 2:00 pm - IP Man-Hash: 620fd0d0b9273
Also, sonyad failed to mention that he wished to start a little pop-quiz. I merely adhered to the subject at hand…
But at least wolfe replied with direct relation to what was being discussed.
Going by all the typos, grammatical and punctuation errors we all seem so fraught with, I overlooked the numbers down the bottom of that random and beside-the-point post as a random spasming of sonyad’s fingers upon the keyboard.
My bad.
Peace, biz
September 2nd, 2006 at 6:50 pm - IP Man-Hash: 109bcf0dfd9d2
BIZ, Sonyad’s pop quiz wasn’t random. He set it in response to this post by yourself.
Here’s another quiz for you. In what way are Australian’s degenerate? A. Because you were not bor in Australia and are mad due to being on the receiving end of racist remarks, B. Because you live anywhere in Qld excluding Kangaroo Point, Cape Tribulation and Sunshine Beach, C. You used to live in Southwestern Sydney.
September 3rd, 2006 at 12:02 pm - IP Man-Hash: c98b2a99f95b1
…. Nice to meet you too.
Yes it was random. This thread is not titled ‘Numerical Puzzles’. It deals with gender issues. Hence, that little quiz is random: beside the point.
Just as your post is.
1: How do I get ‘bor’?
2: Why excluding Kangaroo Point, Cape Tribulation and Sunshine Beach?
3: WTF? … Where does Sydney come into the equation?
Your post makes even less sense than sonyad’s surprise pop-quiz.
Perhaps if sonyad had indicated that he wished to start a number game then I would have replied in kind. Perhaps if you had clearly phrased your odd little ‘quiz’ then I could have replied in kind… But honestly you made no sense there.
How many fucking times do I have to explain that ‘genius’ remark was to DEMONSTRATE THAT JUST ABOUT ANYONE CAN BE A CERTIFIED GENIUS AND IT IS NOTHING SO SPECIAL. I was not advertising myself as an answer machine for all those math questions you want to know the answer to.
Thnx. Peace and respect, and please try to make a little sense next time.
September 3rd, 2006 at 12:19 pm - IP Man-Hash: eded4487db3b7
Perhaps you should just advertise yourself off this website.
September 3rd, 2006 at 12:23 pm - IP Man-Hash: c98b2a99f95b1
For future reference, I will no longer reply to posters that have not had the brainpower/attention span to read all the previous posts on this thread in order to come up with an intelligent addition to the debate.
Some people keep asking the same questions and flogging the same dead horse. The posts that started all the fuss have been explained, as anyone with half a brain knows by now; I have apologised for any and all offense I caused.
Anyone who is still personally attacking me or droning on and on about posts days old and long ago dealt with is simply slow. All relevent questions have been answered and quite frankly the issue is old and cold. Moving on, try to start a more interesting topic of discussion.
Oh, and sonyad: ctrl+alt+delete. (Since you are being unoriginal, so will I, all in the name of fun. Cheers mate.)
Google for the answer to your ‘degenerate Aussies’ question, Female. It was a rather sharp poke at the fact that Aussies are too laid-back to do anything much intelligent… Such as give a rat’s ass about the fact that bombshells containing Depleted Uranium are being exploded on Aussie soil, which will contaminate it with radioactive waste for the next few billion years. Howard signed a 20-year-contract with Bush to allow this.
Now don’t expect me to spout all the facts and figures about this crime upon demand. Research it yourself if you are interested. But there’s the basic fact.
Peace.
September 3rd, 2006 at 12:32 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
An intelligent addition to this thread would be your subtraction from it.
Ro, Bg 2 - 2 draw. You jinxed it with your attention spanning and certifications.
September 3rd, 2006 at 1:27 pm - IP Man-Hash: c98b2a99f95b1
:
… “Jinxed”? Do you read horoscopes too? It’s one and the same… Superstition.
I must say that I am very disappointed; these are far from intellectual ripostes. You two disagree with and dislike me, which you are fully welcome to do, but you resort to telling me to go away and reciting ways to shut down a PC. Unoriginal and rather boring replies, honestly, and you both know it.
A few of you are still acting hurt at something or another, but refuse to state/discuss what it is I have done that has so burned you, just as you refuse to accept my repeated apologies. Instead you merely keep up with the pseudo-clever insults and cries to leave you alone.
I have tried to solve the problem with apologising and clarifying my earlier posts in the most non-hostile and objective view possible, but still you two are harping on about old issues…
If you did not see my many humble public apologies then please read my previous posts in their entirety. You have no justification for these continued personal attacks. If you feel that you do, then please do not continue to keep the details of my crimes against you secret.
Tell me what personal wrongs I have committed against you and I will apologise for them, in an attempt to resolve this bitchfest. Or you could keep snidely offering the same type of suggestions often given by schoolchildren.
Once again I apologise for whatever offense I caused any of you… But I think I will stay on this website, awaiting a good, civil, intellectual adult discussion on gender differences and other similar subjects.
Unless you resort to banning me, which would be both amateur and petty, since I have repeatedly gone out of my way to make amends for whatever issue you have become so upset about.
Peace and respect.
September 3rd, 2006 at 2:07 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
You take yourself wehehey too seriously. Probably related, you also showcase somewhat of a persecution complex.
Anyway, your statements are liable to have offended Female (and others!), who is, and an astounding coincidence here, Ozzy, as in Australian. Yes, there are Australians reading and writing here.
You blanket labelled Australians as degenerates, for no good reason at all. At least none specified. What, did you expect that a bracketed “no offens[
sc]e(this noun in particular is spelt with a ‘C’, the adverb and adjective are spelt with ‘S’. offensiveness is also spelt with an ‘S’)” would somehow nullify the offensive bigotry of that insult?I myself have a predilection of spelling words with ‘S’ instead of ‘Z’. Partly because of my training background being founded in British english, partly because habits intrinsic to a non native, Romanian speaker of English. Forgive me, I’m not usually a stickler for spelling but this I felt I needed to point out.
Back on topic, were you born Australian? Living in Australia does not necessarily qualify you as Australian. That is precisely what Female pointed out pertaining to your insult as assumptive explanation of your reasons for gratuitously denigrating them as a people, they’re also actually more than one ethnic group. Your post reeks of a foreigner’s disdain for the people of a country he has the privilege to live in.
In any case, it’s really something of quite poor taste to say. It is indicative of lack of maturity and poor taste. It’s childish generalisation.
You being born or an Australian citizen would go some, little way to making what you said a lesser insult.
September 3rd, 2006 at 2:14 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Perhaps you are a foreigner of Australia by sentiment only?
Also, I fancy my retorts quite clever indeed. Perhaps if you should try going through them again with a cool, clear head and an unbiased evaluation you too will reach that conclusion.
September 3rd, 2006 at 2:18 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Indeed, a classic example of mistakenly using “will” instead of “would” as grammatically appropriate. Hopefully, I’ve beaten Wolfe to the correction.
September 3rd, 2006 at 3:13 pm - IP Man-Hash: 109bcf0dfd9d2
Are you trying for bitchy irony by signing off with peaceful blessings after you make racist, belittling remarks? You say you want to have a discussion about gender issues, which is fair enough, but I fail to see how your comments about Australians or uranium are relevant to that.
Possibly or it indicates someone whose ancesters were convicts and who therefore believes he/she has the authority to speak about and on behalf of all other Australians. No more pop quiz’s, just a direct question - Do you equate being degenerate with being laid-back, Biz? Cause if you do, you’ve moved to the most degenerate state in the country - enjoy.
September 3rd, 2006 at 3:40 pm - IP Man-Hash: eded4487db3b7
BIZ,
This site is not here to debate the hypothetical moot “Are men better than women?”
It was created to discuss the fact that men are better than women.
You are guilty of the former, and as such your presence is unwanted.
September 3rd, 2006 at 3:49 pm - IP Man-Hash: c98b2a99f95b1
Thank you sonyad for replying with more than an insult or nasty little suggestion/gag often used by children. I really appreciate the fact that you took the time to write a sensible post in regards to this ongoing saga of misunderstanding.
Yes I muck up with the english because I can’t be fucked most of the time, and my typos have been chronic lately.
I find it laughable that you people are so riled up that I generalised (in a bad way) about australians, when you do the exact same about women…
And as far as Aussies go I rather like them, especially the fact that we are largely a continent of immigrants.
I was born here. Female’s ‘quiz’ was just hard to make sense out of. I am sorry for any offence I caused, Female. sonyad’s incessant snappy little posts had me on the anti, since I had no idea that he was no longer waging war. As far as I know at this point. You just jumped in the middle.
“Also, I fancy my retorts quite clever indeed.”
Yeah I noticed, and they are some nice handy ones too. The only problem was that since my arrival on this blog you consistently attacked me (due to my aggressive entrance post) and did not make clear that your quips were (later on) simply for the sake of your amusement, not because you were continuing to be genuinely offended at something that I was at fault for. Therein lay the reason for my so-called ‘persecution complex’ as you labelled my attempts to set things right.
“In any case, it’s really something of quite poor taste to say. It is indicative of lack of maturity and poor taste. It’s childish generalisation.”
As is most of what is said about women on this site. The attitude held toward women here is almost identical to those held toward negros and people of other races by the caucasian westeners etc. (You know what I mean) and it is just as wrong, both as human to human and factually/scientifically. In the time of slaves in America the scientists had proven conclusively that black people were no better than animals… But as science grows it will always contradict whatever it claimed as irrevocable truth in the past.
Oops, there I go with another broad and probably offensive generalization. You get the general idea though, don’t burn me at the stake because I am not 100% politically/grammatically correct 100% of the time.
But each to their own, there are feminist blogs and therefore there must be anti-female blogs, since there are two sides to every coin. Feminazi propaganda is evil and damaging and largely misguided, and so is anti-female propaganda. Racists and gender-particular haters are pretty much the same thing.
Both genders have their faults and failings and no human is perfect. Paying too much attention to gender blinds people to the bigger picture, but we all have our pet hates and I am by no means suggesting an end to this blog. But that’s only my opinion and I will voice it as long as we both are free to voice our beliefs, as will you all. We may disagree over fundamental things but there is no reason that we cannot have a civil talk about whatever the current hot topic is.
I am sure there are numerous grammatical errors in this post but whatever. You can find them if you like. Happy hunting but no prizes, unfortunately.
Since you stated no particular reason why you should be at odds with me, I take it that we are no longer at loggerheads, so to speak…? If so then thank you for making an effort to clear things up.
Peace and respect to you all.
September 3rd, 2006 at 3:51 pm - IP Man-Hash: c98b2a99f95b1
…..The former what?
September 3rd, 2006 at 4:16 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Stating one person is inherently superior or inferior because of his or her skin colour is not tantamount to stating same due to gender.
Can you parallel park?