The F Word
The F word today is Feminism — not fuck like it is usually.
It seems that on the topic of men being better than women eventually the topic of feminism should be covered.
Although I don’t really see why.
Since no one gives a shit about it.
Instead of summing up The Feminism, Feminists, or the Feminist Movement in any way shape or form, I’m just going to let the experts do it for you.
Point your browser over to feministing.com, a harem of horn trumpeting and the slandering of nonsense the likes of which I have never seen before. It’s as if someone has hot-boxed horseshit hysteria. Remember that one short-lived game on American Gladiator, where the contestants and the gladiators would bounce from platforms on bungee cords, with a frantic and desperate mania, to stick Velcro balls to a suspended pole in the middle of an arena? Of course you remember it you’re a man and every episode of that show was man-tasticly great. Feministing.com is a lot like that game. Except instead of contenders, gladiators, and balls; there are only women and their lust for getting outraged as quickly and as often as possible about absolutely any news story that has to do with men, women, or gender. The frantic and desperate mania is quite the same.
Since only men are allowed to read this, I can guarantee what the first thing that catches your eyes on that page will be, and that is the giant picture of the braless woman on the right hand column of the page with her nipples sticking through her shirt.
Let me repeat that.
With her braless nipples sticking through her shirt.
Interesting.
That’s a very interesting thing to see on a site whose sole purpose is to counter that exact kind of female empowerment (read exploitation). It’s so interesting that one might even call it not interesting at all, typical, and complete bullshit hypocrisy.
Far be it from me to tell someone how to run a business — which feminism definitely is, just as much as is Nike Jogging Wear for women. The picture is an ad to sell T-shirts. That’s fine. Everyone knows attractive women sell the goods as well as their goods (while still not being as good as men at doing so). Women see that ad and immediately lust for her braless attention like rabid wolves, frothing at the mouth for their chance to casually tread the line between “taken seriously” and “woops”.
Put your hard helmets on, ladies. Your integrity is dropping like flies as Girl Power strikes again.
Addendum:
If you would like to see what feminists have to say about this site, click here.
Related Articles:
July 15th, 2005 at 12:20 pm - IP Man-Hash: fa48aa19ef342
Once again you’ve gone for an insult because you have nothing that makes actual sense to say.
July 15th, 2005 at 6:06 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3f6f1bc89c9c0
I perused that abscess on the ass of the internet for about 5 minutes, which was almost more than I could stomach. What’s sad is that many of them think this site is “a joke”.
Nicole - please take your overhyped, illogical, predictable, imbecilic posts elsewhere. Of course Dick and I are against doctors’ right not to be terrorised (whatever the fuck that means)…moron.
July 19th, 2005 at 2:59 am - IP Man-Hash: c3fbaaa189425
Nicole I agree your a moron…
a) you are not welcome because there is a clear message that you seam to avoid understanding, showing your true interlect by ignoration.
b) You have listed alot of sites linked from the site, almost every site online barring the good one’s have links to some matter of opinion about women in cultures being speculated by men and women of our culture if they should be allowed to do this or that… I dont support that because only that culture should deal with it, not being interfiered in by me or anybody outside the culture.
c) the sites I do support do not inflict the same problem they are trying to sort out ie:Feministing.com causes men like me to be outraged by the fact that they go round in a circle with this shit, look at the site and look at the world, they do what they are trying to prevent showing a woman in a shirt that i can almost see through clearly, then saying its wrong and that it brings shame to your sex, then why does alot of women do porn films? because of money maybe, some enjoy it.
you cannot class women as one in the views because nobody is alike we just seam similar in main view, but underneath some women are loving what they do, others need money, some do it to get mens attention etc.
the site goes around and around and there is alot about this site you will never realise because women as dick once said are not logical, if you look at logic, you would see what we see, alot of the same shit circling around and yet you women seam to see different, I can give you thousands of non logical ideas, things you women do and what we see, but then you wouldnt understand and I would have to tell you 3 times because you wouldnt understand the first or second.
I am late for dinner cause I am angry at that site, others like it and you as well… bye
July 20th, 2005 at 10:57 am - IP Man-Hash: 6a9283bd40454
Nicole,
You claim to support gender equality; but then you call yourself a feminist (”I guess”).
An organization that promotes the status of individuals based on their gender can’t be supporting equality between genders. It’s a conflict of interest. If “equality is here” as you’ve said, then feminism is no longer relevant. Equality between genders in feminism’s eyes will likely never be achieved since it will lose it’s raison d’être.
August 20th, 2005 at 5:59 pm - IP Man-Hash: 46d8304bbb9af
The reason it is called feminism is because women (feminine humans) were the repressed ones. So the point of feminism is to bring women up to the equal rights of men.
There would be not point calling it manism, because men were not the repressed ones, so that would imply bringing men down to women rights of the times. In other words lower pay etc for everyone.
Not a very good idea.
August 21st, 2005 at 4:37 am - IP Man-Hash: 3dddc19b55aad
You are still using circular logic.
August 21st, 2005 at 5:01 pm - IP Man-Hash: 46d8304bbb9af
Actually it’s called a chain reaction. Like pushing a domino in a line and wondering why they all fall down.
So it’s circular logic? What’s your point? My point is that men caused feminism then complained about it. And you don’t seem to have a point.
August 22nd, 2005 at 5:31 am - IP Man-Hash: 6a9283bd40454
My point is that your argument is invalid.
The reason that you claim that men caused feminism, is based on feminism claiming that men oppressed them. I believe that the root of your arguement (to lay it out more) is something like this:
Feminism was built on the premise that men oppress women
Feminism claims that men oppressed women
Feminism exists
Therefore men oppressed women
Therefore men are responsible for creating feminism
The problem is, that with this type of arguement, the point being made is completely invalid. There is in fact no logical point being made, since the arguement and the premise rely on each other.
See the following for more info:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_logic
In fact I would wager to guess that the only reason, outside of feminism itself (and information promoted to the media by feminist organizations, or feminist thinking individuals), that you have to believe in female oppression; is that you believe that it’s true. And that’s fine. This is the basis of many opinions; but be honest about it being an opinion if that’s the case.
From where I stand, and the research I’ve done; feminism has had a large tendency historically to misrepresent information for political gain, and to contractict itself. Most, if not all, information I’ve read has had heavy biases based on assumptions, that simply tend to be accepted as fact.
I was raised with feminism and wholeheartedly believed in its information, until I grew up and started seeng just how wrong it was about me, as a man; my male friends; and especially the women around me. It has done a profound diservice to relationships overall in my oppinion. Couples ending up in power struggles, where women are afraid of getting close and giving in on almost anything out of fear that they are being taken advantage of. Now I question feminism. Every aspect of it.
It may interest you to know too; that there have been efforts within feminism to minimize logical analysis by claiming that logical analysis itself is male oriented and women work in a “connected thinking” mode, where rational logic is not important, but the collective meaning of expressed experiences is what matters. Now that’s scary. Very cult - brainwashing-ish.
November 13th, 2005 at 12:17 am - IP Man-Hash: 957564b4aff6d
Alen,
I hope you’ll not have a problem with this, seeing as how it’s coming from another woman commenting where she isn’t supposed to…
You should question feminism, every aspect of it. Feminism has caused so many woes! It’s no coincidence that divorce, violent crimes, and single-parenthood rose dramatically after feminism came on the scene.
One woman that opposed feminism asked why women would want to give up a place of special privilege for equality. Why indeed!
I do hold that men are partly responsible for the existence of feminism - not because they were oppressing women, but because they seemed to have allowed feminism to prosper for the sake of getting more sex.
What are your observations on that idea? How many of the men you know would want to see an end to feminism, if it meant a return to marriage before sex?
November 13th, 2005 at 12:25 am - IP Man-Hash: 00ec4afa1ec15
Men are responsible for feminism only because women have the ability to vote. I’ll be posting more on this soon.
-Dick
November 13th, 2005 at 1:32 am - IP Man-Hash: 957564b4aff6d
I had the feminism in the 60’s more in mind, but you’re right, men should not have given in on the subject of voting. Most women vote based on their feelings, while most men vote based on logic. Whether or not a candidate is good-looking doesn’t matter to men, either. We also seem to be more easily deceived and manipulated. (Much to my chagrin, I speak from personal experience.)
Personally, I’d trade my vote to be treated the way women were prior to the 19th amendment. Even the roughest men usually treated a lady like a lady, as long as she behaved like one. It takes sick minds to see attitudes like “women and children first” as patriarchal oppression. I love it when my husband or one of our male friends will hold a door open for me.
Well, I’ve already spent too much time here, though I fear I will continue to be a rule-breaker as I want to visit and see what you have to say on the subject of women voting.
November 13th, 2005 at 2:09 pm - IP Man-Hash: 208bfdbe94f05
There is a site that tuns circles around the one mentioned it’s
http://www.feministing.org/
Much more intelligent.
November 14th, 2005 at 4:33 am - IP Man-Hash: 068c3571e2add
So men caused feminasty-ism because they swallowed the con of ‘more sex.’
Hahahahahahahahahahahah.
Hehehehehehehehelarious example of shooting yourself in the foot. Basically saying that women will use sex to get whatever they can and will exploit a man’s sex drive to manipulate him to acting against his own best interests.
In other words you made us of The Manipulated Man.
How typical. Now load the second barrell and let off another shot.
November 14th, 2005 at 3:27 pm - IP Man-Hash: 957564b4aff6d
Brainiac, I’m not saying my theory is correct - that is why I was curious as to how men would weigh in on the subject.
November 14th, 2005 at 11:47 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0a584ae5f4b57
Indeed, combined with income tax (used to lure female votes)
- the dragon of big government and hydra-head feminism was created.
A parasitic organism that self perpetuates by different special interest groups competing for yearly tax dollars. The symbiotic relationship between the groups and the government fuel its exponential growth via excessive taxation.
The very “wedges” between people these special interest groups try to solve are inadvertantly expanded and magnified by their presence.
Constant “victim mindset” indoctrination (found by a younger female poster above), the automatic “contempt held for men” because of false past oppressions, and finally the replacement of mans purpose via welfare, alimony, CS, mothers allowance has created a society of miserable misguided women.
The original culprit is and always has been the political man-whores seeking brownie re-election points who catered to the superficial needs of women.
November 18th, 2005 at 1:07 pm - IP Man-Hash: f3ae1ac46a2e3
The biggest mistake men ever made was giving women credit — credit of any kind. Unfortunately, I think we’re doomed to make that mistake time and time again. It is in our nature.
-Dick
December 6th, 2005 at 6:56 pm - IP Man-Hash: 597d2ae06f8a1
Rights and responsibilities are ’socially constructed’ concepts, and only in terms of these concepts should men and women be treated as equals. However, you cannot -by law, force or nagging- establish gender equality in football, basketball, car racing, chess, bridge, science, technology, philosophy, logical thinking, etc. All you can and must do is to perform well in these areas. What’s going on today is quite the contrary. Self-centered, selfish, illogical, deluded and brainwashed wimmin of today always demand privileges, never accept responsibilities of any kind and feel abused whenever they can’t get what they want, whenever they fail to back up their opinions with facts and logic or whenever they fail in some field including business, science, philosophy, music, sports, driving etc. Just like little babies, they want to be spoilt and excused for whatever they do. And they want all of this in the name of equality.
As for areas where only performance counts and it is always the male gender that performs better statistically, we have to believe in the socially constructed politically-correct ‘fact’ that men and women are definitely equal, and also that women are more ‘empathic’ and superior to men in social and communication skills, or we are sexist pigs.
December 6th, 2005 at 10:41 pm - IP Man-Hash: 957564b4aff6d
Bravo! Well said. Nothing shows the stupidity of feminism quite as much as the hoops they are willing to jump through in order to claim that black is really white.
January 31st, 2006 at 5:28 am - IP Man-Hash: 2d9698157eaa6
feminisim is stupid!!!
February 1st, 2006 at 3:11 am - IP Man-Hash: 06d0e5b505da1
Payback is on it’s way girls, 2006 will see it coming.