Women Traded Cooking and Cleaning for Blowjobs

Ever wonder why the only place you can get a home cooked, fresh baked apple pie these days is at Marie Calendar’s or at your grandmother’s house?

It’s because during a movement called “Women’s Liberation”, women traded cooking and cleaning for blowjobs

Does anyone also remember when men worldwide exchanged being the sole breadwinner of the house for listening to their woman’s endless screed of woman problems?

No, no one does. That’s because it never happened.

Men don’t operate like that. All of us work on one principle: always going up and always going faster — and better whenever possible, which to a man is all the time. That means we don’t get to trade shit we don’t want to do for things like are easier, like how today’s modern, “liberated” women traded cooking and cleaning for blowjobs.

How typical of the laziness of the female species. When men are requested to do something in addition to what they’re already doing, they just say, “Well I guess I better do that then.” Then they fucking do it.

Women, however, ration their time out in bits and pieces like it was worth half a damn in the first place. The whole thing is amateur and childish, really. Imagine if men worked that way. When we men invented farming and agriculture, we would have just stopped hunting all together and became a veganous species of some kind.

Would you like from fries with your Big Mac? No, because there’s no such thing as a Big Mac in a world without meat. And that’s exactly what we would have if women ran the show. No meat, just a bunch of aimless dreams and junior high grab-ass horseshit.

Related Articles:

RSS feed | Trackback URI

564 Comments in 563 threads.»

Pages: « 2912 11 10 9 8 [7] 6 5 4 3 21 » Show All

Comment by Voice of Reason
2006-05-19 12:41:17

HEY LADIES: DAKOTA SMITH IS BETTER THAN YOU! OH SNAP! DAMN RIGHT I SAID IT, BITCH! WATCHA GONNA DO? HOLLA BACK, BEYATCH! PFFT I KNEW YOU WAS JUST A CHICKENHEAD. DAMN NIGGA, THESE BITCHES IS FRONTIN’. DON’T THEYS KNOW THEY GOTSTA GET THEY OWN CLUBHOUSE, DOG? WORD.

 
Comment by Voice of Reason
2006-05-19 12:33:59

I am fond of the female sex in general and have loved specific women. I just believe that I’m better than they are, that’s all.

NA-NA NA NA-NA!!!!!!

We, the He-Man Woman Haters Club, promise not to fall for this Valentine’s business, because girls are the bunk.

 
Comment by Voice of Reason
2006-05-19 12:20:25

Women Traded Cooking and Cleaning for Blowjobs

I wish! I’d be more than happy to do all the cooking and cleaning in exchange for some sucky sucky fucky fucky. Oh wait…you’re the guy who prefers a dildo up the ass. Perhaps you’d be in a better mood if women traded cooking and cleaning for pegging sessions?

 
Comment by Dakota Smith
2006-05-18 19:09:36

Aubrey:

I’m not the owner of the site, but a frequent poster. However, I find your attitude refreshingly polite compared to most critics of the site. I applaud you for it.

aubrey said:

If women are (as you claim) so inferior…is there any possibility that you would become married to one?

Well, I for one believe that men are better than women. I’ve been married — to a verbally, emotionally, and ultimately physically abusive woman. We’ve divorced, but I do have a female love in my life and will consider marrying her when the time is right.

I was just wondering…after all…I’m only 15 and I’m just curios… I think what drew me to your site was the curiosity for why you found us (the female gender) so repulsive…Just wondering…

I don’t actually find women repulsive in general. I find some of their behaviors generally irrational and irresponsible, but one tends to come to expect that from women and make allowances for it.

All I simply believe is that men are better than women. That doesn’t mean I dislike women. I also happen to believe that Chinese Hot and Sour soup is better than Egg Drop soup. That doesn’t mean I find Egg Drop repulsive unless it was prepared badly. It just means I think Hot and Sour is better.

Don’t mistake believing that men are better than women as being the same as hating or even disliking women. I am fond of the female sex in general and have loved specific women. I just believe that I’m better than they are, that’s all.

 
Comment by aubrey
2006-05-18 18:22:18

Dear Sir…
I have noticed that you said FOR MEN ONLY and I am sorry that I have broken your rules but the truth is that I am a 15 year old freshman at highschool and became facinated with your opions on women. I find it very ammusing and yet totally disagreeable.

If women are (as you claim) so inferior…is there any possibility that you would become married to one? I was just wondering…after all…I’m only 15 and I’m just curios… I think what drew me to your site was the curiosity for why you found us (the female gender) so repulsive…Just wondering…
Sincerly,
Aubrey

 
Comment by Big Al
2006-05-16 05:13:30

abaddon_fff said:

I agree, how would it be phrased though?

I’ve had a few tries, but if you condense it any more it becomes really nasty and, well, unmanly.

Almost womanly, in fact.

-Big Al

 
Comment by abaddon_fff
2006-05-10 09:30:52

I agree, how would it be phrased though?

 
Comment by wolfe
2006-05-10 07:57:57

This insight almost seems worthy of a new Law of Women. It’s certainly mantastic.

Cheers, Al.
-wolfe

 
Comment by Big Al
2006-05-10 04:53:26

johno said:
im a man by the way.

Big Al’s Guide to Women:

If a person puts in their post “I’m a Man”, she is a woman.

If a person puts in their post “I’m a Woman” she is a woman.

If a person just comes straight to the point in their post, he is a man.

Men don’t assume that the world is going to doubt them.

Probably because they don’t spend their time lying about their gender on web sites.

-Big Al

 
Comment by Hammer
2006-05-09 20:48:27

Why is that all the comments by these womyn read exactly the same? They offer nothing original to any discussion and only repeat the same marxist-feminist tripe the previous one wrote. The words logic, consistency, or fact are not in their dictionary.

 
Comment by joeschmoe
2006-05-09 19:40:28

johno said:

just letting you know,women created agriculture. while men were the hunters,women were the gatherers and became very educated in the many plant species and the rearing of young organisms.

im a man by the way.

your comments about men and women are so annoyingly general. a person’s sex dosnt determine their personality/traits. genetics does. and genes are inherited by both the mother AND father.

you seem to think women are stupid.
im from dublin,ireland.
we have an extremely high standard of education,and the women excel.
females(most,not all) dominate the ‘higher level’ classes and the males(most,not all) are always lagging behind,mainly due to laziness.also,they cant keep up with the syllabus and end up dropping out of school.sad.
the women i know are far from lazy.

did you know that 90% of the people in jail are men?

as a matter of curiousity,answer me this question,’man to man’:
have you ever been in love with a woman,dick?

or has one woman done something terrible to you,and now you vow to hate and generalise all women???

I am a man also…..I will tell you, that if I had to pay for a education that REQUIRED gender equality, African American or Womyn’s Studies courses. I would not drop out for laziness. More likely out of sheer boredom, and the inability to see that Womyn’s courses would have ANYTHING, I repeat anything to do with my chosen degree.

Add to the fact that “gender norming” or additional consideration is given for ANY minority, while I am still held to the higher standard, has a tendency to infuriate the hell out of me.

Any moron that tries to dispute the whole “gender norming” deal, here is the heads up. I served in the US military, I experienced and observed the blantant dumbing down of standards, to accomadate the fairer sex. No level of pontificating will make me forget, what was observed by my own two eyes.

 
Comment by christianj
2006-05-09 14:43:15

One does wonder if they actually read anything else besides their feminised tainted version about the planet and it’s inhabitants or whether they are actually capable of seeing outside of their own selfish circle.

The education system as we have already found out, is solely skewed towards women. This is a proven fact. They only have to attend “women’s studies” to be awarded a degree in psychology as most women are only interested in trying to work out their own screwed up minds with no success or better still an Arts Degree as they are the easiest to achieve.

It is also a known fact that if it were left to women we would still be living in caves and incubating kids is not it either.
Picking berries does not constitute “helping” with agriculture, it only means that freeloaders were difficult to get rid of, just like your incoherent rantings and falacies.

We have already thoroughly negated all the points you raise, but here you are still trying to score some more. You are going through the same motions as ten other females before you have already tried over the last month. totally meaningless and pathetic efforts trying to inform readers and posters consistant feminist lies.

Using the same pathetic effort to elevate your sex back onto the podium will not work here. We already know what women are all about.

One day you will stumble across the facts, unfortunately with you it may take a litle longer that usual.

 
Comment by Geeza
2006-05-09 11:05:28

The evidence of Johno being a man is disappearing fast too.

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2006-05-09 10:34:30

There’s absolutely no evidence women had a hand in creating agriculture.

None.

-Dick

 
Comment by johno
2006-05-09 09:49:27

just letting you know,women created agriculture. while men were the hunters,women were the gatherers and became very educated in the many plant species and the rearing of young organisms.

im a man by the way.

your comments about men and women are so annoyingly general. a person’s sex dosnt determine their personality/traits. genetics does. and genes are inherited by both the mother AND father.

you seem to think women are stupid.
im from dublin,ireland.
we have an extremely high standard of education,and the women excel.
females(most,not all) dominate the ‘higher level’ classes and the males(most,not all) are always lagging behind,mainly due to laziness.also,they cant keep up with the syllabus and end up dropping out of school.sad.
the women i know are far from lazy.

did you know that 90% of the people in jail are men?

as a matter of curiousity,answer me this question,’man to man’:
have you ever been in love with a woman,dick?

or has one woman done something terrible to you,and now you vow to hate and generalise all women???

 
Comment by Big Al
2006-04-28 06:10:20

Effing pot said:

Fact 1 - You design a comments section underneath each article so that anybody from the web can post without restriction.

Fact 2 - You put a sign on your website ´No women allowed´

It is a contradiction to present a service that is available to men and women with no restriction (your comments section) and then claim that women are not allowed. So you are putting a restriction where there technically is none (even by your hand).

Um, it relies on something called “honour”, which I guess you don’t know about. It’s when you are trusted to abide by the terms of the site as set out on the front page.

Oh, and “respect”, where you don’t go barging in where you’re not wanted.

But I guess you wouldn’t be familiar with either concept, Effing Pot/Gent (“I am a man”)

-Big Al

 
Comment by Dick Masterson
2006-04-27 09:55:08

Is it stupid then to put up a sign that says ‘Keep Off the Grass’ without erecting a twenty foot barbed wire fence?

It isn’t a contradiction. It’s just that you’re an asshole who can’t follow simple requests.

Completely masculine kudos to Dan for that analogy.

-Dick

 
Comment by mike
2006-04-27 05:33:34

restricting*

 
Comment by mike
2006-04-27 05:19:11

Nothing is restricted you from diving at the shallow end either, or crossing the street when the sign clearly says “wait here”.
But you do it anyway, then complain when you snap your neck, or get mowed down by a huge truck.

 
Comment by Effing pot
2006-04-27 01:44:15

Actually my point was very clear as to why it was stupid. But I will reiterate.

Fact 1 - You design a comments section underneath each article so that anybody from the web can post without restriction.

Fact 2 - You put a sign on your website ´No women allowed´

It is a contradiction to present a service that is available to men and women with no restriction (your comments section) and then claim that women are not allowed. So you are putting a restriction where there technically is none (even by your hand).

 
Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI

Close
E-mail It
Powered by ShareThis