Fighting the Good Fight
I recently had the misfortune of speaking with a highly ranking NOW member. At least that’s what she said. She couldn’t, however, explain to me exactly how one could rank highly in an organization like NOW. It’s like being a captain of the Swedish Submarine Brigade or the CEO of Armpit Fart Noises Inc. Seriously, what the fuck?
I raised several valid points about women being catastrophes and hazards to have in any level of government or under employ in any position where showcasing their sexuality was not the main job skill. I’m not talking about just prostitutes either. There are plenty of jobs where women exploit their sexuality: sales ladies, bar ladies, school teachers.
Why the fuck else would so many women teach? Because it’s easy?
Needless to say, I got the brush off. After all my salient and well put together points, I was called a derelict of this and that generation — the Stepford card was played, and I was summarily brushed aside.
Women can’t fight for causes for shit.
Men are natural born diplomats and politicians. We’re leaders and figureheads. It doesn’t matter what the cause is, if you put a man in charge of it, it’ll win. And ten years later everyone will look back and say, “Jesus, I can’t believe we ever thought any other way.” If a woman’s in charge of it, ten years later everyone will be saying, “Shit. We might have fucked that up.”
Does the name Susan B. Anthony ring a bell?
Women are natural born poor customer service reps. Now what happens when you put a shitty customer service rep in charge of a movement? Fuck, put them in charge of gathering lunch for the office, you get the same thing either way. A series of shrill regurgitations and an ethos of martyrdom. You end up with feminism.
When you’re an alleged highly ranking member of any organization, you can’t just brush off any Tom, Dick, or Harry with a flip of the wrist and a party talking point. That’s bad business.
To their credit, however, there has been one and only one woman in the history of the whole fucking world who knew how to fight a cause for shit: Joan of Arc. Here’s a little bit of food for thought, men. Make that a juicy rib eye for thought with a side of twice baked potato and sour cream and a mug of beef stew. It’s in a mug so you don’t have to use a bunch of silly effeminate silverware to enjoy the soup.
Joan of Arc had Syphilis.
Saying Joan of Arc is a hero is like saying someone who’s been drinking Jagermeister for three hours is strong because he put his head through the windshield of a Peugot. He’s not strong. That’s just what people who have been drinking Jagermeister for three hours do — crazy things. Cousin Larry who won the eating contest while he was stoned out of his mind? He wasn’t hungry, he was high!
I think I’ve made my point. A woman’s brain works better while it’s being consumed by an STD.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 5 4 3 2 [1] Show All
a href=”#comment-4351″ title=”View the original comment”>Female said:
Ah yes, but that implies that there must have been a pre-existing problem that they needed to correct.
-True,true.
As men have always dominated cultures, they must have created the imbalance problem in the first place, and then turned around and tried to correct it, under the banner of a “just cause” or “good fight”, cause we know how men like dramatics, heroics etc etc. Male ego at work, can’t remember the relevant Man Law number.
See you were doing so well, then you had to go and open your mouth again. Listen, MEN haven’t dominated all cultures, and likewise MEN haven’t dominated all women. I would posit that a small percentage of MEN have dominated MEN AND WOMEN throughout history. MEN like dramatics? Wow, you are really misinformed, this is coming from a person whose gender likes such greats as “The Bridges of Madison County” and “Steel Magnolias” Hah what a joke. Another thing you fail to mention, is that those men that did turn the tide of barbarism and injustice, did it for the betterment of humanity, what would have happened if no men went and fought? We’d still be living in caves thats what.
Female, I suppose you may be correct to an extent, but higher causes in themselves are ideals worth devoting one’s entire life to. I think those conceptions are mankind’s greatest achievement as far as Im concerned.
How many threats to leave is that now? Is anyone keeping track of this spineless example of everything I’ve said so far on this site?
Such language.
-Dick
Ban me asshole and I’ve left a present for you in the forums.
The last post of yours I deleted was about a spider that was loose in your car. Men don’t come here to read your off-topic horseshit, Female. Get some real friends and fuck off my site.
-Dick
If you were clearer in your expression I would be able to understand you, but something tells me you don’t want me to understand. Like, how you like to delete my posts that must hit the mark.
What a surprise. The mule hasn’t a clue.
-Dick
???
That’ll hold up in court. Actually I’m surprised at how stupid you women are. That one should be easy for you to remember.
Accessory.
-Dick
Which came first, crime or the police? When you’ve figured out which is was, I’ll get back to you on which sex invented both.
Note for believers: She didn’t steal the apple, it was a gift.
Like how the police create crime. Right, idiot?
-Dick
Ah yes, but that implies that there must have been a pre-existing problem that they needed to correct. As men have always dominated cultures, they must have created the imbalance problem in the first place, and then turned around and tried to correct it, under the banner of a “just cause” or “good fight”, cause we know how men like dramatics, heroics etc etc. Male ego at work, can’t remember the relevant Man Law number.
Spider karma is not good karma.
Most higher causes have been pioneered and fought for by men :)
Needless to say, I got the brush off.
You’re kidding! I canna believe it.
Does the name Susan B. Anthony ring a bell?
Nope, is that who gave you the brush off?
How’s business? Moving many off the lot in between making prank calls, lolz xx