Fighting the Good Fight
I recently had the misfortune of speaking with a highly ranking NOW member. At least that’s what she said. She couldn’t, however, explain to me exactly how one could rank highly in an organization like NOW. It’s like being a captain of the Swedish Submarine Brigade or the CEO of Armpit Fart Noises Inc. Seriously, what the fuck?
I raised several valid points about women being catastrophes and hazards to have in any level of government or under employ in any position where showcasing their sexuality was not the main job skill. I’m not talking about just prostitutes either. There are plenty of jobs where women exploit their sexuality: sales ladies, bar ladies, school teachers.
Why the fuck else would so many women teach? Because it’s easy?
Needless to say, I got the brush off. After all my salient and well put together points, I was called a derelict of this and that generation — the Stepford card was played, and I was summarily brushed aside.
Women can’t fight for causes for shit.
Men are natural born diplomats and politicians. We’re leaders and figureheads. It doesn’t matter what the cause is, if you put a man in charge of it, it’ll win. And ten years later everyone will look back and say, “Jesus, I can’t believe we ever thought any other way.” If a woman’s in charge of it, ten years later everyone will be saying, “Shit. We might have fucked that up.”
Does the name Susan B. Anthony ring a bell?
Women are natural born poor customer service reps. Now what happens when you put a shitty customer service rep in charge of a movement? Fuck, put them in charge of gathering lunch for the office, you get the same thing either way. A series of shrill regurgitations and an ethos of martyrdom. You end up with feminism.
When you’re an alleged highly ranking member of any organization, you can’t just brush off any Tom, Dick, or Harry with a flip of the wrist and a party talking point. That’s bad business.
To their credit, however, there has been one and only one woman in the history of the whole fucking world who knew how to fight a cause for shit: Joan of Arc. Here’s a little bit of food for thought, men. Make that a juicy rib eye for thought with a side of twice baked potato and sour cream and a mug of beef stew. It’s in a mug so you don’t have to use a bunch of silly effeminate silverware to enjoy the soup.
Joan of Arc had Syphilis.
Saying Joan of Arc is a hero is like saying someone who’s been drinking Jagermeister for three hours is strong because he put his head through the windshield of a Peugot. He’s not strong. That’s just what people who have been drinking Jagermeister for three hours do — crazy things. Cousin Larry who won the eating contest while he was stoned out of his mind? He wasn’t hungry, he was high!
I think I’ve made my point. A woman’s brain works better while it’s being consumed by an STD.
Related Articles:
July 9th, 2007 at 5:04 am - IP Man-Hash: a730319341049
And apes are superior to mankind because they preceded us. Or so you would have us believe.
July 9th, 2007 at 6:32 am - IP Man-Hash: a4d09f925fa82
An example of how Female, an ardent feminist completely misses the point in the issue. Look below:
What the fuck was that? You prevaricated around the ENTIRE issue and went on about “The Bridges”. Oh… my… god. Either you failed basic english or you are overly radical and deluded. I am guessing the latter.
Dont whine and bitch at me for pointing that out; I challenge you to respond at issues rather than an issue which you attempt to make a mockery of.
Oh, blow me.
July 9th, 2007 at 7:21 am - IP Man-Hash: 51f86d6005c2d
The Y in womyn is obviously derived from penis envy.
July 9th, 2007 at 7:22 am - IP Man-Hash: 3c8b05bf321cc
@ Doubt- Yep, people should be viewed as individuals and neither gender should have be given a false advantage. But “don’t try to intimidate your physical superiors”? Women shouldn’t have to live in fear of men any more than a smaller man should fear a larger one. People should be able to say basically whatever they want regardless of their size without fear of physical retribution. As for physical intimidation, the weak attacking the strong is extremely unfair (since the strong is then forced to either violate their principles by attacking someone weaker than them, or just accepting the abuse), and the strong should respect the weak’s rights and not resort to violence without very good cause.
Also, enough with attacking the female body. Breasts are not “fat sacks” and our hips aren’t “warped”. Male and female bodies are suited for different purposes and are therefore built differently, but one isn’t superior to the other. And breasts, by the way, unless they are VERY large, do not cause back pain or prevent women from playing sports or hiking.
July 9th, 2007 at 7:55 am - IP Man-Hash: 160e0041dcad8
Women can’t have breasts as sex objects.. then claim they aren’t when faced with charges for exposing them in public.
Pick one… can’t have both.
Enough with attacking the female body? You ever been in near a group of hackling hens tearing apart their husband’s penis in public.. some even at work do this constantly… within ear shot of children.
Disgusting.
July 9th, 2007 at 11:45 am - IP Man-Hash: 3c8b05bf321cc
I don’t think Doubt called them “fat sacks” and a “fat, bloated chest” in regards to women exposing their breasts, he just refers to breasts that way in general. I’ve heard women making fun of their husband’s/boyfriend’s physique… but then, I’ve heard men do the same of their wife/girlfriend. Doubt, however, constantly calls the female body inherently warped, deformed, and unnatural. I haven’t heard women say the same of the male body.
July 9th, 2007 at 11:52 am - IP Man-Hash: 1b85be027ad1c
men are just jealous of female parts *cough*
July 9th, 2007 at 1:51 pm - IP Man-Hash: 81cf23f923f46
Alex and Jess, while I don’t think there is anything wrong with the female body, you have to admit, men are physically superior to us. As a general rule, of course.
I happen to be very strong for a woman. I build muscle almost instantly. It’s genetic. But as strong as I am, I doubt I could win an arm-wrestling match against a man of average strength. That’s just the way it is. Accept it and move on.
July 9th, 2007 at 4:18 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5fd634f6ed1ed
You should read my article on strength of man. It has alot of philosophical thoughts on what really makes you strong mentally and physically.
July 9th, 2007 at 5:17 pm - IP Man-Hash: 3c8b05bf321cc
@ KellyMac- Men are stronger as a rule, yes, but that doesn’t make their body superior. Again, men and women are built for different purposes. A man’s body may be superior for every day tasks that require strength, but it is obviously useless for bearing children, which is what a woman’s shape is built for. Our “warped” hips and “fat sacks” serve a purpose as important as men’s muscles. And, by the way, Doubt actually does say there is something inherently wrong with and unnatural about women’s bodies.
July 9th, 2007 at 11:11 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9a305b0d72d4d
so you speak for every strong woman in the world. thanks, that is duly noted. physical power doesn’t mean you are BETTER than someone else. tard. some of the greatest minds of this world are attached to some weak ass bodies.
July 9th, 2007 at 11:13 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9a305b0d72d4d
lol what has “doubt” been reading? i’m curious. anyway, good post sista.
oh, and men aren’t always stronger. just had to say that. also, men and women compliment each other. i think that’s great.
July 9th, 2007 at 11:14 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9a305b0d72d4d
You should read my article on strength of man. It has alot of philosophical thoughts on what really makes you strong mentally and physically.
you can do some powerful things with your mind
July 9th, 2007 at 11:15 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9a305b0d72d4d
And apes are superior to mankind because they preceded us. Or so you would have us believe.
yea because i just said that ::rolls eyes::
if you’re going to refute something, make it RELEVANT.
July 9th, 2007 at 11:16 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9a305b0d72d4d
says who? ever heard of womb envy? it’s very real. freud’s theory on “penis envy” has been disregarded by the APA
July 9th, 2007 at 11:17 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9a305b0d72d4d
i’d be jealous ;-)
July 9th, 2007 at 11:18 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9a305b0d72d4d
are you one of those people who over-generalize everyone b/c of a few incidences?
Disgusting.
July 9th, 2007 at 11:18 pm - IP Man-Hash: 27820ae317b9e
And apes are superior to mankind because they preceded us. Or so you would have us believe.
yea because i just said that ::rolls eyes::
if you’re going to refute something, make it RELEVANT.
Here is a thought: Maybe he did?
Well, he took Clitn’s logic out of that specific context, and showed why it was illogical.
But you knew that already, right?
July 9th, 2007 at 11:19 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9a305b0d72d4d
guess it’s a counter attack. :)
July 9th, 2007 at 11:21 pm - IP Man-Hash: 27820ae317b9e
i’d be jealous ;-)
I would prefer not bleeding every month, actually. Besides, your hinting at sexual body parts are rather annoying.