Marie Curie Deserves a Nobel Prize in Full of Shit
You know, I’m seriously sick of all this Marie Curie nonsense.
Men, let me tell you one thing that I know as 100% fact. Marie Curie was not some fucking super scientist that saved all women from the brink of total historical irrelevance. Women can’t be scientists; plain and simple. It’s not in their blood.
What she actually was — just like every other successful woman in history — was an opinionated, bray-hard, nag ninny with a penchant for stealing the work of her diligent husband.
Marie Curie was the Courtney Love of the 1920’s.
Watch me as I compile a man-erific list of evidence against this pseudo-chemist broad-fraud and her tall tales of females in science. The very idea of which is as laughable as a farting machine.
First of all, Madam Marie Curie didn’t win any fuck all Nobel Prize. She won a third of a Nobel Prize. And to do so she had to support herself on not only her husband, but some other dude as well. How typical of a woman to allow her business relationships to become inappropriately mingled with her personal life. If Marie Curie deserves any kind of Nobel Prize, it’s one for Cock Teasing — which shouldn’t be rewarded. That’s why there’s no Nobel Prize for it.
Marie Curie was the first woman to be allegedly awarded the Nobel Prize.
Here’s a lesson that I’ve learned while reading books of history. I’m a man so I enjoy history. I find it a comfortable fit with my manly ethos; like a worn jacket or old pair of sneaking shoes. Unlike women of course, who loathe history as much as they hate being told they’re just as obnoxious as their mothers. And they all are.
Throughout my years of didactic historical research, I’ve realized that any time a woman is the first to do something it’s always complete token bullshit. And I mean industrial-grade, economy-sized bullshit. The kind of tangled nonsense horseshit you get when you cross a woman and an opinion, or a mule and a spinning wheel. Just like Sandra Day O’Connor, Susan B. Anthony, Edith Wharton, Rebecca Felton, Lucy Stone, Madeline Albright, and Sally Ride; Marie Curie is nothing more than a lip-serviced “Runner Up” in the history of MAN.
What my point is, is that instead of hijacking her husbands work on radiation and spouting an infeasible, overly-idealistic and immature philosophical dogma about scientific progress while doing so, Marie Curie should have been going for her Nobel Prize in Not Dying of Radiation Poisoning like a twat. What the fuck do women know about scientific progress anyway? How about absolutely nothing.
Marie Curie was also widely known as a racist — and she was also Polish so you know she was dumb as shit.
Related Articles:
now i know why you keep spawning articles of something so controversial and so damn ridiculous…you love all the attention dont ya?..lol..you little son of a gun…look at the NUMBER AND FREQUENCY of responses to a relatively small entry of yours…mind boggling..;)
well then the MEN that selected her for the nobel prize which she actually won two of by the way would’ve been pretty fucking stupid for giving a Nobel prize to someone who hasn’t done anything. thats worse than her.
Really after that first paragraph you’re the last one to be speaking of excircising your brain.
“Also polish”. So your not only sexist, your racist. And as a word of advice, not all of us hate history. I greatly enjoy history. I got between 85%-95% in my history classes. But maybe because canadian history isn’t littered with as much racist, sexist, war mongering horse shit as the U.S.A.’s is. And do you know where all of that horse shit comes from? Christianity.
I suppose writing is for ladies Dick, but writing is an extremely intellectual practice and a wonderful way to exercise your brain. I didn’t call, more so, because being Canadian would mean having to pay long distance fees to leave my wonderfully intelligent voice on your shitty answering machine.
When do any women who come on this site know their limits? LMAO!
- Sgt. Reyes
Girly-girls are hilarious little oinkers. Listen to that, she’s so fucking stupid and she’s even dumber for not knowing her limits!
Using X-rays huh? X-rays were discovered by a man.
You care for one; since you are arguing. Plus his site has over 1 million hits. So basically, you lost all credibility with that statement (not that you had any in the first place).
hmm, i was under the impression that her husband (whose name I do not know) also died of radiation poisoning because he had the bright idea to keep radioactive material in his breast pocket… Then again, this discovery was made before the discovery that radioactivity = bad. So I guess her husband isn’t a stupid twat but she is for dying that way?
can you offer any proof?
Dumb as loam.
What did that have to do what Samantha and I were saying?
Penis envy? Don’t make me laugh.
With that much grammatical and spelling errors as well as poor structuring of sentences, I am going to call you bluff. Bullshit.
Btw, welcome aboard Spartan.
Kristina, I’m only 15 years old but I got more sense then you. Women’s argument always come to something related about “getting laid” or some shit about “what we would do without sex”. Always the penis envy, eh? Very classy.
Samantha…You Rock. Men, come on now, quit putting her down; Just because she is right, and you are wrong. She even came at you with a civilized tone. She wasn’t calling you gay or useless maggots, she was pointing a fact…
As some of you tell us to do, GROW UP! :) Men aren’t always right, they just like to think they are.
If English is not your native language, then I suggest you master formal usage before you delve into the e-speak, especially since women are so e-stupid.
Marie Curie gave blow-jobs to the Swedish Academy of Sciences members to get the prize. The only bacteria she discovered were the ones she gave to the poor bastards through her disgusting mouth!
P Coderch
im sorry but I think U r just a perv how can u say that that is the most se4xist thing ive heard are u saying woman are stupid well men are ven more stupid why cuz all them fucken thing about is sex so how the fuck could her husband have wrote that we do not need this opinion if we are worhtless then ha what would u pervs do without sex fuck u woman are not stupid we are actually smarter than men
My bad… :)
alen, you’re arguing/lecturing semantics and meaning with a woman! What’s next, explaining to a Ju Ju Bee the impact of Toqueville’s America on the modern republic?
Good luck with that. I’m only kidding of course.
For those of you who don’t know, a Ju Ju Bee is a hardened candy similar to a Gummi Bear. It has no brains.
-Dick
(meant) … typing on the other hand.. I do need another coffee for this morning it seems.
Actually, I means some times. Although either are acceptable, with “some times” the emphasis is on specific (real) times, rather than the vague time associated with sometimes.
Need a hand?
try, sometimes
(some times)
Thanks Dick.
There certainly seems to be an ample supply of female Fuckheads out there.
I mean it can be interesting some time to see how far they go; but honestly… they’re just shooting themselves in the foot here…
Anyone that hasn’t read this, should….
http://thingy.apana.org.au/~fun/fsckhead.html
Nice catch, alen.
I have two words for everyone: IP Man Hash.
-Dick
Have a reference?
PS: It seems that that the person’s name you are referencing in your area of expertise is spelled “Rosalind Franklin”.
I have published genetic research at rutgers university.If you say so Dick.
Samantha, you could also say that many men would have invented or made discoveries faster if their women assistants had been replaced by competent men.
-Dick
What have you published?
This site is endlessly amusing. No that wasn’t sarcasm, to see how both sides, argue is entertaining, however as a woman and a published Scientist, this article is just bullshit.Woman have made hundreds of contributions to science, many men would not have invented or made discoveries without the assitance of women, for example Watsona dn Crick would have never discovered the structure for DNA (my are of expertise) without the assitance of Rosalynd Franklin, who accurately depicted the structures using x-rays. This article just peaked my interest so I thought I’d voice my opinion. (Great forum though I commend you.)
Ciao.
Estrogen causes brain damage? That’s interesting, John. I’m going to have to do some research on that.
-Dick
Ahh, finally a man of reason!
I think that the Nobel Committee is best equipped to decide who deserves a prize and who doesn’t. I would also say that rarely, if ever, does one person that worked alone ever make a major scientific breakthrough. But rather than trying to make a rational justification for your hatred of women, pehaps it’s more sensible to argue that Ms. Curie was not a woman at all, but rather a man in dsiguise! Demonstrable facts don’t seem to influence your pronouncements very much anyway. This way, us men can save face and hold our heads high, safe in the “knowledge” that estrogen causes brain damage or in whatever whimsical misogynistic delusion we care to endorse today…
Got em all fired up Dick, bugger isn’t it when you show wimmin for exactly what they are.
I am wondering if she ( the curry womyn) used her pro-feminist, ball-busting, empowerment-womyn-kick-ass-men-know-nothing type physics or did she have to use ours ?
Geeza, that’s hilarious. “Stepped on their tails.â€? I’ve got to use that one. It’s true though; women hate any kind of criticism. Constructive or otherwise, it makes no difference. It’s all poison.
-Dick
“Unlike women of course, who loathe history as much as they hate being told they’re just as obnoxious as their mothers. And they all are.”
Another gem that I previously missed out. My Missus and her sis both hate their mother, bet if I ever tell them that they are behaving like her (which they do of course) then they screech and rant as if I’d stepped on their tails or something.
Yes, historical truth is hidden by the idiocy known as political correctness. Political correctness says it’s ok to do or say whatever you want, as long as you’re not white, or a man.
And the fact that you pounce on men for trying to find the truth, while simultaneously quoting the politically correct version of history is simply an example of the system in action. Create an image for society that women can do whatever they want, while men are stupid brutes who are always wrong, and soon people who have been raised in that society will believe it, and vehemently support that view, while simultaneously calling for “equality” (ie, female domination)
Ah the ole ‘internet is for everyone’ shtick. Have you considered a career in comedy? By the look of your picture, you’ve got a real face for radio.
Tax payers money put to good use….
Now, if you had said:
No, I am not in therapy. My parents were not negative towards me the way yours were.
You’d be right. As written, it was ambiguous.
Sad when you have to explain a joke to such a “literate” young lady…
Alen, learn to read: “No I am not in therapy”
Personly I come on here to irritate the hell outa Dick, and also because the internet is for everyone, if I wana be here, I’l be here.
“Has it occurred to you that no one cares what you think either Dick? Really.”
If no one cares, than why do they come to a site he maintains and pays for? Pays for with money that comes as a result of his hardwork I might add…
Final interesting tidbit: HIStory…
Then why ARE you in therapy?! ;o)
Has it occurred to you that no one cares what you think either Dick? Really.
P.S. No I am not in therapy because my parents were not negative towards me the way yours were.
Again. Horty. You’ve got to take that Show and Tell, This is My Life bullshit elsewhere. Just like everywhere else, no one here cares what you’re going to do — ever.
-Dick
I don’t have a psychologist, I’m going to become one, but I never said that I had one.
Why does it not surprise me that both of you two crazy broads have psychologists by the ages of 16 and 17?
-Dick
Well as an American, you wouldn’t get a psychologist for free now would you?
Therapy bills?
-Dick
Oh no Dick, we wouldn’t want to be positive towards children. That would save too much money in later life on therapy bills.
My god man, I bet your parents never complimented you once as a child. Which may explain why you turned out the way you did, so dam negative.
Won two Nobel Prizes jointly!? Is this like how everyone wins for graduating the fifth grade just for showing up.
Congratulations kids, you’re all winners! And if women ran the world, that’s exactly how you’d be rewarded for the rest of your life.
What a bunch of bullshit.
-Dick
Maybe the ‘truth’ you’re looking for doesn’t exist, because in actual fact she was a brilliant scientist who deservedly won 2 nobel prizes, jointly or otherwise.
Jimbo,
I couldn’t agree with your sentiments any more than I do.
I think the men here should know that I actually found it difficult to find any information on how much malfeasance has been perpetrated on the account of Marie Curie. The truth is being buried out there in the history books. And that doesn’t fit well with my man sensibilities.
-Dick
Ladies, ladies, ladies. Calm down. Remember; you’re not even supposed to be on this site, let alone commenting about it. Be more like Marie Curie and sit on the sidelines while the men do all the commenting. And while you’re at it, get me a cup of coffee.
*hypocrisy
…guess it was too complicated for you as well.
“Marie Curie was also widely known as a racist — and she was also Polish so you know she was dumb as shit.”
Erm, hypocricy, or is that word a little complex for you boys.
Just how many famous science awards ARE named after women anyway?
Thanks for clearing that up, Dick. Actually, since chemistry is a lesser subject than physics, you may decide to factor that in as well.
Oh, and Elliott? Thanks for your insightful followup, you boring little puddle of piss.
hey,
fuck you brewer. you can cough on my cock
The second Prize was awarded after her husband’s death. It is therefore completely inadmissable as a full prize. We can only hypothesize that she might have been given half credit for it were he still around. And that’s a generous estimate.
Total prize: 5/6ths.
-Dick
“First of all, Madam Marie Curie didn’t win any fuck all Nobel Prize. She won a third of a Nobel Prize.”
Marie Curie won a joint prize in Physics and then a Nobel in chemistry. So actually, Dick, she won four thirds of a Nobel.
*cough*