Marie Curie Deserves a Nobel Prize in Full of Shit
You know, I’m seriously sick of all this Marie Curie nonsense.
Men, let me tell you one thing that I know as 100% fact. Marie Curie was not some fucking super scientist that saved all women from the brink of total historical irrelevance. Women can’t be scientists; plain and simple. It’s not in their blood.
What she actually was — just like every other successful woman in history — was an opinionated, bray-hard, nag ninny with a penchant for stealing the work of her diligent husband.
Marie Curie was the Courtney Love of the 1920’s.
Watch me as I compile a man-erific list of evidence against this pseudo-chemist broad-fraud and her tall tales of females in science. The very idea of which is as laughable as a farting machine.
First of all, Madam Marie Curie didn’t win any fuck all Nobel Prize. She won a third of a Nobel Prize. And to do so she had to support herself on not only her husband, but some other dude as well. How typical of a woman to allow her business relationships to become inappropriately mingled with her personal life. If Marie Curie deserves any kind of Nobel Prize, it’s one for Cock Teasing — which shouldn’t be rewarded. That’s why there’s no Nobel Prize for it.
Marie Curie was the first woman to be allegedly awarded the Nobel Prize.
Here’s a lesson that I’ve learned while reading books of history. I’m a man so I enjoy history. I find it a comfortable fit with my manly ethos; like a worn jacket or old pair of sneaking shoes. Unlike women of course, who loathe history as much as they hate being told they’re just as obnoxious as their mothers. And they all are.
Throughout my years of didactic historical research, I’ve realized that any time a woman is the first to do something it’s always complete token bullshit. And I mean industrial-grade, economy-sized bullshit. The kind of tangled nonsense horseshit you get when you cross a woman and an opinion, or a mule and a spinning wheel. Just like Sandra Day O’Connor, Susan B. Anthony, Edith Wharton, Rebecca Felton, Lucy Stone, Madeline Albright, and Sally Ride; Marie Curie is nothing more than a lip-serviced “Runner Up” in the history of MAN.
What my point is, is that instead of hijacking her husbands work on radiation and spouting an infeasible, overly-idealistic and immature philosophical dogma about scientific progress while doing so, Marie Curie should have been going for her Nobel Prize in Not Dying of Radiation Poisoning like a twat. What the fuck do women know about scientific progress anyway? How about absolutely nothing.
Marie Curie was also widely known as a racist — and she was also Polish so you know she was dumb as shit.
Related Articles:
Pages: « 4 [3] 2 1 » Show All
(meant) … typing on the other hand.. I do need another coffee for this morning it seems.
Actually, I means some times. Although either are acceptable, with “some times” the emphasis is on specific (real) times, rather than the vague time associated with sometimes.
Need a hand?
try, sometimes
(some times)
Thanks Dick.
There certainly seems to be an ample supply of female Fuckheads out there.
I mean it can be interesting some time to see how far they go; but honestly… they’re just shooting themselves in the foot here…
Anyone that hasn’t read this, should….
http://thingy.apana.org.au/~fun/fsckhead.html
Nice catch, alen.
I have two words for everyone: IP Man Hash.
-Dick
Have a reference?
PS: It seems that that the person’s name you are referencing in your area of expertise is spelled “Rosalind Franklin”.
I have published genetic research at rutgers university.If you say so Dick.
Samantha, you could also say that many men would have invented or made discoveries faster if their women assistants had been replaced by competent men.
-Dick
What have you published?
This site is endlessly amusing. No that wasn’t sarcasm, to see how both sides, argue is entertaining, however as a woman and a published Scientist, this article is just bullshit.Woman have made hundreds of contributions to science, many men would not have invented or made discoveries without the assitance of women, for example Watsona dn Crick would have never discovered the structure for DNA (my are of expertise) without the assitance of Rosalynd Franklin, who accurately depicted the structures using x-rays. This article just peaked my interest so I thought I’d voice my opinion. (Great forum though I commend you.)
Ciao.
Estrogen causes brain damage? That’s interesting, John. I’m going to have to do some research on that.
-Dick
Ahh, finally a man of reason!
I think that the Nobel Committee is best equipped to decide who deserves a prize and who doesn’t. I would also say that rarely, if ever, does one person that worked alone ever make a major scientific breakthrough. But rather than trying to make a rational justification for your hatred of women, pehaps it’s more sensible to argue that Ms. Curie was not a woman at all, but rather a man in dsiguise! Demonstrable facts don’t seem to influence your pronouncements very much anyway. This way, us men can save face and hold our heads high, safe in the “knowledge” that estrogen causes brain damage or in whatever whimsical misogynistic delusion we care to endorse today…
Got em all fired up Dick, bugger isn’t it when you show wimmin for exactly what they are.
I am wondering if she ( the curry womyn) used her pro-feminist, ball-busting, empowerment-womyn-kick-ass-men-know-nothing type physics or did she have to use ours ?
Geeza, that’s hilarious. “Stepped on their tails.â€? I’ve got to use that one. It’s true though; women hate any kind of criticism. Constructive or otherwise, it makes no difference. It’s all poison.
-Dick
“Unlike women of course, who loathe history as much as they hate being told they’re just as obnoxious as their mothers. And they all are.”
Another gem that I previously missed out. My Missus and her sis both hate their mother, bet if I ever tell them that they are behaving like her (which they do of course) then they screech and rant as if I’d stepped on their tails or something.
Yes, historical truth is hidden by the idiocy known as political correctness. Political correctness says it’s ok to do or say whatever you want, as long as you’re not white, or a man.
And the fact that you pounce on men for trying to find the truth, while simultaneously quoting the politically correct version of history is simply an example of the system in action. Create an image for society that women can do whatever they want, while men are stupid brutes who are always wrong, and soon people who have been raised in that society will believe it, and vehemently support that view, while simultaneously calling for “equality” (ie, female domination)
Ah the ole ‘internet is for everyone’ shtick. Have you considered a career in comedy? By the look of your picture, you’ve got a real face for radio.
Tax payers money put to good use….
Now, if you had said:
No, I am not in therapy. My parents were not negative towards me the way yours were.
You’d be right. As written, it was ambiguous.
Sad when you have to explain a joke to such a “literate” young lady…