Marie Curie Deserves a Nobel Prize in Full of Shit
You know, I’m seriously sick of all this Marie Curie nonsense.
Men, let me tell you one thing that I know as 100% fact. Marie Curie was not some fucking super scientist that saved all women from the brink of total historical irrelevance. Women can’t be scientists; plain and simple. It’s not in their blood.
What she actually was — just like every other successful woman in history — was an opinionated, bray-hard, nag ninny with a penchant for stealing the work of her diligent husband.
Marie Curie was the Courtney Love of the 1920’s.
Watch me as I compile a man-erific list of evidence against this pseudo-chemist broad-fraud and her tall tales of females in science. The very idea of which is as laughable as a farting machine.
First of all, Madam Marie Curie didn’t win any fuck all Nobel Prize. She won a third of a Nobel Prize. And to do so she had to support herself on not only her husband, but some other dude as well. How typical of a woman to allow her business relationships to become inappropriately mingled with her personal life. If Marie Curie deserves any kind of Nobel Prize, it’s one for Cock Teasing — which shouldn’t be rewarded. That’s why there’s no Nobel Prize for it.
Marie Curie was the first woman to be allegedly awarded the Nobel Prize.
Here’s a lesson that I’ve learned while reading books of history. I’m a man so I enjoy history. I find it a comfortable fit with my manly ethos; like a worn jacket or old pair of sneaking shoes. Unlike women of course, who loathe history as much as they hate being told they’re just as obnoxious as their mothers. And they all are.
Throughout my years of didactic historical research, I’ve realized that any time a woman is the first to do something it’s always complete token bullshit. And I mean industrial-grade, economy-sized bullshit. The kind of tangled nonsense horseshit you get when you cross a woman and an opinion, or a mule and a spinning wheel. Just like Sandra Day O’Connor, Susan B. Anthony, Edith Wharton, Rebecca Felton, Lucy Stone, Madeline Albright, and Sally Ride; Marie Curie is nothing more than a lip-serviced “Runner Up” in the history of MAN.
What my point is, is that instead of hijacking her husbands work on radiation and spouting an infeasible, overly-idealistic and immature philosophical dogma about scientific progress while doing so, Marie Curie should have been going for her Nobel Prize in Not Dying of Radiation Poisoning like a twat. What the fuck do women know about scientific progress anyway? How about absolutely nothing.
Marie Curie was also widely known as a racist — and she was also Polish so you know she was dumb as shit.
Related Articles:
Pages: [4] 3 2 1 » Show All
You’re actually being generous about the 1903 prize. According the Nobel website, Becquerel got 1/2 the prize, while Pierre and Marie got 1/4 each. It’s as if the Nobel committee recognized the Curies as a single entity, so they only got a single share! If Marie’s contributions were truly independent, she should’ve got a 1/3 of the prize, a full share like everyone else.
admilumi
admilumi
If I see get off bitch, i’ll know why……
now i know why you keep spawning articles of something so controversial and so damn ridiculous…you love all the attention dont ya?..lol..you little son of a gun…look at the NUMBER AND FREQUENCY of responses to a relatively small entry of yours…mind boggling..;)
Polish men, I assume, then would logically be responsible for the delicious man-snack, Polish Sausage. Sausage is a manly food in itself, for it’s very contents are encased within the pig’s intestinal skin. It would most certainly have taken a very manly man indeed invent ways to preserve man’s hard earned food within the intestines of the animal itself. It is therefore my man-clusion that that the idiocy of the Polish woman is of such colossal magnitude, the Polish man’s intellect has been called into question.
well then the MEN that selected her for the nobel prize which she actually won two of by the way would’ve been pretty fucking stupid for giving a Nobel prize to someone who hasn’t done anything. thats worse than her.
I wouldn’t expect such a vastly inferior mind to comprehend the true nature of the situation, as has been noted on several occasions throughout this magnificent man-website.
Let my try to explain this as simply as possible: The only reason she was “awarded” with one third of the prize, is because the Nobel Award Awarding Council saw and recognized that Marie Curie was sure to seek some sort of shallow congratulatory award to make her feel good about her inferior intellect, and to avoid the wrath of undoubtedly cranky feminists, decided to award her with far more than was her fair share, (further demonstrating the greater compassion of men) if only to shut her undeserving and cum-slicked lips for but a brief second.
You see, men do not seek psychological validations for scientific advances he has made. A man knows when he has done well for fellow man, and requires no trophy to commemorate it. I will admit however, that trophies make excellent doorstops.
Really after that first paragraph you’re the last one to be speaking of excircising your brain.
“Also polish”. So your not only sexist, your racist. And as a word of advice, not all of us hate history. I greatly enjoy history. I got between 85%-95% in my history classes. But maybe because canadian history isn’t littered with as much racist, sexist, war mongering horse shit as the U.S.A.’s is. And do you know where all of that horse shit comes from? Christianity.
I suppose writing is for ladies Dick, but writing is an extremely intellectual practice and a wonderful way to exercise your brain. I didn’t call, more so, because being Canadian would mean having to pay long distance fees to leave my wonderfully intelligent voice on your shitty answering machine.
When do any women who come on this site know their limits? LMAO!
- Sgt. Reyes
Girly-girls are hilarious little oinkers. Listen to that, she’s so fucking stupid and she’s even dumber for not knowing her limits!
Using X-rays huh? X-rays were discovered by a man.
You care for one; since you are arguing. Plus his site has over 1 million hits. So basically, you lost all credibility with that statement (not that you had any in the first place).
hmm, i was under the impression that her husband (whose name I do not know) also died of radiation poisoning because he had the bright idea to keep radioactive material in his breast pocket… Then again, this discovery was made before the discovery that radioactivity = bad. So I guess her husband isn’t a stupid twat but she is for dying that way?
can you offer any proof?
Dumb as loam.
What did that have to do what Samantha and I were saying?
Penis envy? Don’t make me laugh.
With that much grammatical and spelling errors as well as poor structuring of sentences, I am going to call you bluff. Bullshit.
Btw, welcome aboard Spartan.
Kristina, I’m only 15 years old but I got more sense then you. Women’s argument always come to something related about “getting laid” or some shit about “what we would do without sex”. Always the penis envy, eh? Very classy.
Samantha…You Rock. Men, come on now, quit putting her down; Just because she is right, and you are wrong. She even came at you with a civilized tone. She wasn’t calling you gay or useless maggots, she was pointing a fact…
As some of you tell us to do, GROW UP! :) Men aren’t always right, they just like to think they are.
If English is not your native language, then I suggest you master formal usage before you delve into the e-speak, especially since women are so e-stupid.
Marie Curie gave blow-jobs to the Swedish Academy of Sciences members to get the prize. The only bacteria she discovered were the ones she gave to the poor bastards through her disgusting mouth!
P Coderch