Fuck Marriage
This is a very important and very special MenAreBetterThanWomen because it’s a treatise on my favourite topic: marriage. The conclusion is this:
Do not get married!
Do not do it now. Do not do it later. Do not do it for looks. Do not do it for money. Do not do it for sex. Do not do it because people want you to. Do not do it because a woman wants you to. Do not do it because The Bible says to do it. Do not do it to have children. Do not do it for tax purposes. And especially — the most important reason of all reasons every thrown into a reason oven and baked on Man degrees for a day and a half — do not get fucking married for love!
There’re three reasons why you shouldn’t get married, and when I say three I mean there are about a fucking billion reasons why not to get married. That’s one for every skin cell of the woman you’re dating that’s going to turn into a wrinkled mess inside of 20 years.
There are three big reasons though.
1. It’s against your manstincts.
When in the whole universe of fuck has a man’s manstincts ever been wrong about anything. I’ve seen a man punch through a wall twice in a row using his manstincts and not hit a single fucking stud. I’ve seen a man win 30,000 American Dollars at a Black Jack table using his manstincts. My cousin had a dog who wandered over 100 miles home from a stranger’s house in the course of two weeks. Guess what gender that dog was. I’ll give you a hint. It had a fucking dick.
Men’s manstincts are never wrong. That’s because men’s brains are super-charged with experience, a special lubricating coating I call Think Juice, and about 60 times the processing power of women. Women don’t have the brains to have instincts. They barely have the fucking brain power to walk upright. That’s probably why women used to wear gloves.
2. You don’t have to.
Have you ever seen one of those tags on the bottom of a mattress that says “Fuck Off. Don’t Remove This Tag”? I’ve never seen one, but I’ve seen plenty of comedians talk about them so they might as well be real for the purposes here. You know what happens when you remove one of those tags? Not a fucking thing.
How about this. Have you ever walked on grass where a sign said “Do Not Fuck Around on the Grass” or had a fourth pint when woman said you shouldn’t have a fourth pint?
Fucking of course! That’s called being a goddamn man. And what happened after you perpetrated that shit? Absolutely nothing. That is exactly what happens when a women threatens you with anything in exchange for marriage.
I’ve seen the fucking The Rock. I’ve seen every movie starring Nicholas Cage like six times because he’s the most mantastic actor of the day. I remember the part where his hot girlfriend threatened him with a break-up if they didn’t get married.
Scary huh? She was awfully hot.
The I also remember the part in The Rock when Sean Connery had hair and the US President didn’t sound like a fucking hillbilly. The Rock was a piece of fucking fiction. Real women never follow through on anything in their goddamn lives. Only women who are written by men do that. If a woman ever threatens you over a missing ring, tell her to go fuck herself. She won’t. Women are too sex crazed to stop coming back for it over some fucking ring. Please. We’re talking about the gender who’d fuck Lionel Ritchie because he can sing. You think they can cut off sex on tap over a dowry. Fuck you.
3. Plausible Deniability
If you go into a bank with a ski mask on a gun in your pocket, you’re probably going to get stopped at the door — or sent into some kind of fucking man trap, I don’t know. I don’t run a bank. Better yet, if you see someone in the middle of the street crack a beer, unbelt, and then drop their pants to the ground; guess what. They’re about to do something fucking stupid.
That’s what getting married is. You’re signing a fucking binding — a Fuck You binding contract in an imaginary, somehow non-sexist world where women have no earning power past 30, that says you will support their ass out of pure benevolence and with no expectation other than getting harangued by a raging fucking bitch about 6 years passed her prime.
Do not go into a bank with fucking ski mask on and a sack of potatoes in your pocket. Do not pull down your pants in public if you aren’t about to do something funny. Do not get married unless you can look in the mirror and say this:
“Hello, <your name said derisively>. Five years from now, I want to indefinitely support an adult woman long after she has stopped fucking me, started fucking as many other guys as possible, and always, always acts like a raging bitch.”
Trick question. You can’t say that because you’re a fucking man.
Related Articles:
August 21st, 2006 at 7:24 am - IP Man-Hash: 15c9819bbdda2
I love it!
August 21st, 2006 at 8:58 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Dick channels Dr. Seuss.
Seems like coming up on 16 years we’ve had one of those, albeit one was a Rhodes scholar hillbilly.
Well-written as always, Dick.
-wolfe
August 21st, 2006 at 2:35 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4555637db20cf
Ouch, wolfe, very ouch. I’ve always harboured a great amount or respect and admiration for that man. He proved that even if a woman had a psychology degree from Lewis & Clark College, she still had only one purpose in politics.
August 21st, 2006 at 3:18 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Who the fuck is doctor Seuss?!!!
Is he swiss?
August 21st, 2006 at 3:26 pm - IP Man-Hash: 15c9819bbdda2
Okay boys… don’t be letting your guys say stupid things while trying to make women look stupid.
August 21st, 2006 at 3:46 pm - IP Man-Hash: cb99b69c1d558
wolfe, I think you’d like Jay Nordlinger’s Carter column for National Review back in ‘02: There He Goes Again.
-Big Al
August 21st, 2006 at 5:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: 775184d81dfb7
There’s not much to try at. You do it on your own.
The truth is out.
Marriage is not being avoided by men because we fear commitment, it’s just that modern women think “commitment” means if you don’t find out who she’s fucking behind your back, and you keep paying her bills, then everythings good.
Men have something besides our 60x superior brains called “honor”. For us it means when we commit to something, we actually commit, not “half ass commit” while stealthily having affairs with whoever shows our pathetic asses attention at the bar or at work or wherever the cool place for sluts is these days.
You should go to a site that makes men look bad. But it will probably suck, since we’re perfect. That’s the advantage of being an original design and not a hackjob of a extra rib, no soul, and some minor brainpower cobbled together with spare parts from vultures and cats.
August 22nd, 2006 at 1:07 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Isn’t that cute? I read, write and speak your language better than you do yet I must clearly be stupid to no get some cultural reference thrown in at random.
It’s ok. I already knew humour is lost on women.
August 22nd, 2006 at 2:11 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Someone’s laughing, Lord, kumbaya!
Someone’s laughing, Lord, kumbaya!
Someone’s laughing, Lord, kumbaya!
August 22nd, 2006 at 4:20 am - IP Man-Hash: 68cb7479382dc
OH, look! Once again a dumbass woman disparages the form of how something is communicated, instead of the the knowledge that is imparted from that communication. How boringly typical.
August 22nd, 2006 at 6:08 am - IP Man-Hash: 4b440c9da9641
You’re right sonyad. I apologize for the “stupid” comment.
August 22nd, 2006 at 6:43 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
What about the stupid comments?
August 22nd, 2006 at 6:48 am - IP Man-Hash: 4b440c9da9641
Okay, I take it back.
August 22nd, 2006 at 7:27 am - IP Man-Hash: 4555637db20cf
What you should be taking back is that silly name: cathouse teri
You fool! Do you have any idea what a cathouse is? Perhaps you do, hence this article.
August 22nd, 2006 at 10:10 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Aside: This post simply discusses Dr Seuss.
@Sony: Dr Seuss, was the penname of Theodor Seuss Geisel. He was best known as a children’s book author, very well known in pretty much the entire English-speaking world. Despite the European (German) name, he was born in the US, though studied at Oxford.
His style was unique: he generally wrote in anapestic tetrameter (an older meter oft-used by English poets such as Byron) and his best known books contain very few unique words, and are simplistically, but joyously illustrated.
This gifts his writing with a charming cadence, and, simultaneously, a degree of accessibility to small children unparalleled at the time.
One of his best-known (and best-selling) works was The Cat in the Hat. It contained only 250 unique words. It is said that after he wrote this, his publisher bet him he could not write a best-selling book with only 50 words. He took the bet; the result was “Green Eggs and Ham”.
The structure of the story consists of one character trying to persuade another to try “green eggs and [green] ham”. The character responds with a series of parallel assertions, concerning green eggs and ham.
Dick’s construction of
brought up elegant echoes of Seuss’ writing. Moreover, the very idea of someone being persuaded to marry (or not) brought up echoes of the story itself (someone being persuaded to try green eggs and ham). There’s a literary word for that kind of double-reference, but I forget it. No matter.
More non-seuss below, back on topic.
-wolfe
August 22nd, 2006 at 10:21 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
@Teri. Yes, cheap shot at someone from another culture who simply doesn’t get an (obscure to him) cultural ref.
@Al. Yeah I remember reading that column when it came out. Used to get NR on dead trees, now just read NRO. (General lack of time). Carter is highly destructive of the non-partisan comity and support that ex-Presidents have traditionally offered their successors. He’s also wrong on nearly every issue imaginable.
One possible exception: I think the push on Human Rights in Eastern Europe, buttressed by the Helsinki Accords, had a subtler and deeper impact than most Reaganite Conservatives would acknowledge. There were some positive aspects of the Carter/Zbigniew Brzenzinski policy in that regard. And at least they never said “Poland is not under Soviet Domination”.
@son of suns. What you say is sadly largely true. Honor indeed.
@*
Bottom line? Marriage is dangerous.
-wolfe
August 22nd, 2006 at 12:31 pm - IP Man-Hash: 12a058b6dc4b3
What about marrying foreign women? I hear that many foreign women are actually worth it since they act more like women of the past. What about women from Latin America, East Asia, Southeast Asia, South Asia, Middle East, and Russia? I heard that they can cook, clean, and fuck 10 times better than Western Women. Many are also not an anti-man feminist.
August 22nd, 2006 at 12:36 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4b440c9da9641
I can’t think of a single good reason to get married. So, fuck marriage? How about just fuck! That’s what I’ve settled on, and it works much better!
August 22nd, 2006 at 12:48 pm - IP Man-Hash: 174f3a6512e36
Impressive.
Proving to us what we all know to be true:
Women who come to this site are abuse loving damaged goods incapable of maintaining a relationship.
August 22nd, 2006 at 1:09 pm - IP Man-Hash: 6897e3ddf8ad0
How about just fuck off my site.
-Dick
August 22nd, 2006 at 1:54 pm - IP Man-Hash: 112422d706a3e
Your billboard says men are than better women.
August 22nd, 2006 at 2:08 pm - IP Man-Hash: 12a058b6dc4b3
What about marrying foreign women? :D
August 22nd, 2006 at 2:25 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4555637db20cf
Really? How did you figure that out?
August 22nd, 2006 at 3:37 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Many men are doomed to regret having married and a few women not having.
August 22nd, 2006 at 3:47 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Well, if you don’t think that (say), Russian women can’t be acquisitive and pick up on western women’s worst features awfully fast, then you are likely to be disappointed.
I’ve a friend who just married a woman from Belarus; I’ll let you know how it works out. Me, I’m predicting divorce once she’s got her citizenship solidly.
Not because she’s from Belarus, but because she’s a woman.
That said, I’ve another friend who married a nice Filipina girl. Of course, she’s RC, and he’s Jewish, so you can imagine how popular that made him with his family. It took his sister marrying an apostate Muslim for them to let him off the hook.
So, I’m not sure that marrying “foreign women” (keep in mind that’s got a different meaning to everyone reading this site) is a panacea.
-wolfe
August 22nd, 2006 at 4:09 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Marrying a gentile must be a big no-no then and marrying a muslim, the capital sin.
August 22nd, 2006 at 4:11 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Pretty much. The family wasn’t orthodox, but…
Still, really, that little anecdote further proves the point of this site. The son ’screwed up’ in his father’s eyes, but he could securely do so, knowing his sister would be coming along soon to make a much bigger distraction.
-wolfe
August 22nd, 2006 at 4:35 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
I think I’d be far more open to the idea of marrying a Jewess than a Jew. Call me antisemite.
August 22nd, 2006 at 8:48 pm - IP Man-Hash: 1a4ed84419c7b
im buying a wife/cunt from the internet… preferably a mute model I think Ill take a young brunnette one with low miles and alot under the hood chances are shed find a new way to annoy me and fuck things up. nah fuck it just get me a dishwasher and a playboy and leave me alone for a while…
August 22nd, 2006 at 8:52 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Or just rationally homophobic in your own personal life?
Yeah. I’d actually be reluctant to marry either, though obviously more willing to marry the female. That said, the pressure her parents would put on to have kids… the thought of a Jewish mother-in-law with a goy son-in-law… No thanks.
-wolfe
August 23rd, 2006 at 3:16 pm - IP Man-Hash: bf61cd5d9d46d
So, is the mistake on the billboard on purpose? Because if it is, the humor in that eludes me.
August 24th, 2006 at 12:07 am - IP Man-Hash: 2da9b7d34e824
Big Train, aka verivertiteri, fuck off my website, you stupid cunt.
Apparently the IP Man-Hash eludes her as well.
-Dick
August 24th, 2006 at 5:30 am - IP Man-Hash: bf61cd5d9d46d
Does that mean it was on purpose?
August 24th, 2006 at 6:24 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Yes, pumpkin tits. It means whatever you want it to mean. Now go back to sleep, dear.
My apologies to Dakota Smith.
August 24th, 2006 at 7:20 am - IP Man-Hash: bf61cd5d9d46d
I finally figured out what this website reminds me of. I once saw an after-school-special about an experiment with high school kids who started a club based on the teachings of a great leader. The kids flung themselves into the thing wholeheartedly. The best part of it was that even the outcasts and rejects were accepted as equals. This was of immeasurable value to those who had been used to being regarded as non-essentials all of their lives. For the first time, what they said mattered! AND, for the first time, THEY were the ones who got to reject those who weren’t in the “club.” They all gathered one day to finally meet their leader, who had spoken to them only in absence up to that point. It was a big day. You can imagine their horror when they discovered that when the curtain went up, their leader was Hitler.
August 24th, 2006 at 7:50 am - IP Man-Hash: 4555637db20cf
veriveriteri/Big Train, you would have voted for Hilter, so you have no point!
Now go away.
August 24th, 2006 at 8:36 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Every German man, woman and child should seek you out and beat you to a bloody pulp for what you wrote.
August 24th, 2006 at 8:46 am - IP Man-Hash: de67bec4e9a38
Why is MISchief and MISery the only things women can create?
It saddens me that they aren’t good at anything else.
August 25th, 2006 at 11:55 am - IP Man-Hash: 0d17ac160ff85
Assuming it is not a lie, I am surprised this person remembered an after-school special with this theme. Watching an after-school special? Outcasts and rejects? Mattering to someone? Obviously, the show made an impression her. As they say, if the shoe fits.
August 25th, 2006 at 4:29 pm - IP Man-Hash: 86e22b5728baf
August 25th, 2006 at 4:29 pm - IP Man-Hash: 86e22b5728baf
I love that!
August 25th, 2006 at 4:54 pm - IP Man-Hash: 6897e3ddf8ad0
That sounds more like a better episode of The Twilight Zone.
-Dick
August 27th, 2006 at 9:47 pm - IP Man-Hash: a6d7c26eb9d5f
Ignore the bullet points of the following article at your own risk.
The Forbes.com article that ignited a firestorm of protest (even after it was yanked) from American Cuntery……
Point: Don’t Marry Career Women
By Michael Noer
How do women, careers and marriage mix? Not well, say social scientists.
Guys: A word of advice. Marry pretty women or ugly ones. Short ones or tall ones. Blondes or brunettes. Just, whatever you do, don’t marry a woman with a career.
Why? Because if many social scientists are to be believed, you run a higher risk of having a rocky marriage. While everyone knows that marriage can be stressful, recent studies have found professional women are more likely to get divorced, more likely to cheat, less likely to have children, and, if they do have kids, they are more likely to be unhappy about it. A recent study in Social Forces, a research journal, found that women–even those with a “feminist” outlook–are happier when their husband is the primary breadwinner.
Not a happy conclusion, especially given that many men, particularly successful men, are attracted to women with similar goals and aspirations. And why not? After all, your typical career girl is well-educated, ambitious, informed and engaged. All seemingly good things, right? Sure…at least until you get married. Then, to put it bluntly, the more successful she is the more likely she is to grow dissatisfied with you. Sound familiar?
Many factors contribute to a stable marriage, including the marital status of your spouse’s parents (folks with divorced parents are significantly more likely to get divorced themselves), age at first marriage, race, religious beliefs and socio-economic status. And, of course, many working women are indeed happily and fruitfully married–it’s just that they are less likely to be so than non-working women. And that, statistically speaking, is the rub.
To be clear, we’re not talking about a high-school dropout minding a cash register. For our purposes, a “career girl” has a university-level (or higher) education, works more than 35 hours a week outside the home and makes more than $30,000 a year.
If a host of studies are to be believed, marrying these women is asking for trouble. If they quit their jobs and stay home with the kids, they will be unhappy (Journal of Marriage and Family, 2003). They will be unhappy if they make more money than you do (Social Forces, 2006). You will be unhappy if they make more money than you do (Journal of Marriage and Family, 2001). You will be more likely to fall ill (American Journal of Sociology). Even your house will be dirtier (Institute for Social Research).
Why? Well, despite the fact that the link between work, women and divorce rates is complex and controversial, much of the reasoning is based on a lot of economic theory and a bit of common sense. In classic economics, a marriage is, at least in part, an exercise in labor specialization. Traditionally men have tended to do “market” or paid work outside the home and women have tended to do “non-market” or household work, including raising children. All of the work must get done by somebody, and this pairing, regardless of who is in the home and who is outside the home, accomplishes that goal. Nobel laureate Gary S. Becker argued that when the labor specialization in a marriage decreases–if, for example, both spouses have careers–the overall value of the marriage is lower for both partners because less of the total needed work is getting done, making life harder for both partners and divorce more likely. And, indeed, empirical studies have concluded just that.
In 2004, John H. Johnson examined data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation and concluded that gender has a significant influence on the relationship between work hours and increases in the probability of divorce. Women’s work hours consistently increase divorce, whereas increases in men’s work hours often have no statistical effect. “I also find that the incidence in divorce is far higher in couples where both spouses are working than in couples where only one spouse is employed,” Johnson says. A few other studies, which have focused on employment (as opposed to working hours) have concluded that working outside the home actually increases marital stability, at least when the marriage is a happy one. But even in these studies, wives’ employment does correlate positively to divorce rates, when the marriage is of “low marital quality.”
The other reason a career can hurt a marriage will be obvious to anyone who has seen their mate run off with a co-worker: When your spouse works outside the home, chances increase they’ll meet someone they like more than you. “The work environment provides a host of potential partners,” researcher Adrian J. Blow reported in the Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, “and individuals frequently find themselves spending a great deal of time with these individuals.”
There’s more: According to a wide-ranging review of the published literature, highly educated people are more likely to have had extra-marital sex (those with graduate degrees are 1.75 more likely to have cheated than those with high school diplomas.) Additionally, individuals who earn more than $30,000 a year are more likely to cheat.
And if the cheating leads to divorce, you’re really in trouble. Divorce has been positively correlated with higher rates of alcoholism, clinical depression and suicide. Other studies have associated divorce with increased rates of cancer, stroke, and sexually-transmitted disease. Plus divorce is financially devastating. According to one recent study on “Marriage and Divorce’s Impact on Wealth,” published in The Journal of Sociology, divorced people see their overall net worth drop an average of 77%.
So why not just stay single? Because, academically speaking, a solid marriage has a host of benefits beyond just individual “happiness.” There are broader social and health implications as well. According to a 2004 paper entitled “What Do Social Scientists Know About the Benefits of Marriage?” marriage is positively associated with “better outcomes for children under most circumstances,” higher earnings for adult men, and “being married and being in a satisfying marriage are positively associated with health and negatively associated with mortality.” In other words, a good marriage is associated with a higher income, a longer, healthier life and better-adjusted kids.
A word of caution, though: As with any social scientific study, it’s important not to confuse correlation with causation. In other words, just because married folks are healthier than single people, it doesn’t mean that marriage is causing the health gains. It could just be that healthier people are more likely to be married.
August 28th, 2006 at 6:09 am - IP Man-Hash: c984a75816a9f
Of course they would protest and complain. It’s talking about ending the financial success of many women. Marraige is the key to gain financial rewards. How else can they get a new car, house and have someone else pay for it all?
August 28th, 2006 at 3:26 pm - IP Man-Hash: a7b18d1ab9e86
Here’s a possible explanation, Billy.
Women are conditioned to believe that ANYTHING worthwhile has to have a level of PAIN involved. Not necessarily physical pain, but even the SIMPLEST of tasks has to be made as DIFFICULT as possible. For example:
You’re at home watching the game, and you run out of beer (you lose man points right there; you should have properly stocked up beforehand). So you get up at halftime (assuming American football or basketball is your thing) and you say to wifey or g/f, “I’m going to the store, do you want anything?” Of COURSE she’s going to want or “need” only a “couple” of items, so you make a mental note and make the beer run. You get the beer and the “needed” items, and make it back just time for the second half. You sit down, crack open your cold one, maybe some chips (hey, they had a sale on Doritos), and enjoy the third quarter. The game gets interesting in the fourth quarter,with three or four minutes to go, when you-know-who calls out, “I need ______.” ” Quite naturally, you ask, “WHY DIDN’T YOU TELL ME THIS WHEN I WENT OUT THE FIRST TIME?” She replies, “I didn’t know we were out of ________”. Which is, of course, utter BULLSHIT. You end up with a broad with an attitude because you waited until the game ends to go back (you lose man points again because you didn’t chuck her the keys and say, ” I’ve had 10 beers, I can’t drive-YOU get it), becuase she “needed” the forgotten item right then and there!
Another example:
Think about the music a lot of women listen to…there’s a song that goes “No Pain, No Gain”….another one that goes “Hurts So Good” …this one is NOT sung by John Mellencamp-totally different song..many of these “pain-filled” songs are sung BY women FOR women (as the two mentioned are; they are blues songs, but you guys can mention any number of top-40 pablum that falls in the same category)…the pain and suffering is a sign of love to them!
It is all about self imposed misery: a woman simply CANNOT be happy for ANY reason! Any endeavor HAS to be painful to a woman to be worthwhile; whether it’s a side effect of bearing children or something like that, I don’t know. This is why women will pack 3 suitcases for a weekend trip, this is why women stress over what to wear when going out, this is why women agonize over whether they should choose the beige purse or the tan purse (WHAT’S the FUCKIN’ DIFFERENCE!?)
Hopefully, this serves as an explanation, if not THE explanation! Peace!
August 28th, 2006 at 4:32 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4555637db20cf
Nice thoughts there, lhook10. Perhaps this may explain why the idiots are attracted to jerks. They prefer the anguish of being in a relationship with a man who treats them like shit.
August 28th, 2006 at 6:48 pm - IP Man-Hash: b8f4057cccb8b
And the anguish they inflict upon themselves by being with a jerk adds to their store of beloved gossip…”Nice guys” don’t exactly make for long phone conversations with girlfriends, ya know!
August 28th, 2006 at 7:03 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4555637db20cf
Sometimes they do. If the “Nice Guy” has a fat bank account, she will have very long conversations about how much he spends on her. She love sthat because it will make all her friends jealous, and thus hate her. I know that it doesn’t make sense to a man to revel in your friends hating you, but its women we’re talking about here.
August 29th, 2006 at 7:46 am - IP Man-Hash: c984a75816a9f
lol
diamatik
I find truth amusing at times and bloody painful at other times.
September 4th, 2006 at 6:19 am - IP Man-Hash: 8c92c4db09a99
September 4th, 2006 at 6:22 am - IP Man-Hash: 8c92c4db09a99
I THINK ITZ ALL ABOUT HUNTING IN PAIRS……….
September 4th, 2006 at 12:04 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4555637db20cf
Okay, that went way above my hear there.
September 4th, 2006 at 12:24 pm - IP Man-Hash: d865e00d5fef0
Dude, you are a fucking legend, just strolled across this site, absolutly fantastic, top marks!
September 4th, 2006 at 4:08 pm - IP Man-Hash: a534d221e3ca9
You mean mantastic!
September 4th, 2006 at 7:09 pm - IP Man-Hash: d8f419652ad49
Appreciated, Sweet Chilli.
-Dick
September 11th, 2006 at 12:55 am - IP Man-Hash: f39c364652da8
fuck you
September 11th, 2006 at 3:01 am - IP Man-Hash: eadd56da2c7c9
I misread that. I thought you wrote “Hunting in Paris”.
I was getting excited there for a minute.
-Big Al
January 26th, 2007 at 4:10 pm - IP Man-Hash</