Fuck Women’s Sports: Part Fucking 3
Women’s newest complaint in the arena of sport is that their token female sideline commentators have to go into “icky” men’s locker rooms and see “gross” enormous wieners to get their jobs done.
A penny saved is a woman fired.
Between periods, pregnancies, and lawsuits, I’m surprised women have any time left in the workday to play Solitaire.
You’d never hear a male sports reporter complaining for easier access to female athletes. That’s because women athletes are disgusting wildebeests who should be hunted on safari and not seen, heard, or interviewed.
Fuck women’s sports.
Women cluttering up our ear-waves with their shitty post-game interviews all started with whinny plaintiff Melissa Ludtke. In 1977, she sued Major League Baseball for access to the men’s locker room during the 1977 World Series. I’m assuming she had no husband or children at the time. Without children or a man, the only thing a woman has in her life is the ability to complain. She needs to get that attention from someone or she’ll disappear like piss in a swimming pool.
Can you imagine a man doing the same thing if the genders were reversed? Suing to see a bunch of hideous pigs in their natural habitat after playing to an empty arena? What a loss of Man Points!
After Melissa Ludtke won her lawsuit to see men’s penises, she began a campaign of distraction and bullying against the awesome world of men and sporting.
In 1979, Michele Himmelberg, who is probably a bitch, sued for access to see the Tampa Bay Buccaneers wieners. Because this development, all reporters were banned from the locker room.
If you think reporters were banned because athletes have a problem with getting their penises checked out by desperate women who couldn’t make careers in bathing suits so they picked up a microphone, you’re wrong. You’re probably also a woman. Fuck off my website. Male reporters have something female reporters can’t suck out of their station manager: class. That’s why the athlete/reporter relationship worked so smoothly for so many years. Men were doing all the interviewing and they were conducting themselves with dignity.
Then women came in shoe-horning their vagina in everyone’s face. You’re there to sell Cheetos and Coors Light, sugar tits. No one even wants to hear your name.
I would also like to note that it’s quite likely female sports reporters became involved in sports because they thought it would get them more attention from their fathers. It’s called the Electra complex and it means women want to fuck anyone, anytime, anywhere; even if they’re related.
That’s called incest, and while women might sue it into being legal, it will still be gross.
Lisa Olson, another pioneer in complaining, got the general manager of the Patriots fired for not molly-coddling her enough to do her job, and for not feeding his awesome NFL team salt-peter after they kicked ass on the gridiron. Allegedly, a group of Patriots surrounded her and began making vulgar comments and gestures. When asked how many women would trade their souls for the exact same treatment, I had only this to say:
All of them.
With enough Michele Himmelberg’s in the world, we would never have had the glory of Howard Cosell and Mohammed Ali. Nor would we be able to savor the pithy remarks Larry Merchant. And we probably would have never heard about Marv Albert biting that prostitute’s ass. Who cares about prostitutes? It’s that a pimp’s job?
Here’s a quote from Melissa Ludtke. I’ll let you be the judge on whether she’s a bitch or not.
“Changing the rules doesn’t necessarily alter attitudes.” -Ludtke
It’s a good thing women can’t sue everyone into being nice, isn’t it? Let’s keep it that way. Don’t vote for Hillary.
Read more at The Ministry of Silly Walks
Related Articles:
Pages: « 9 8 7 6 [5] 4 3 2 1 » Show All
You got served. Your attack on his posting reeks of desperation itself. And it is Ironic, but not Ironic like Alannis Morrissette thinks irony is, but Irony like Webster, a man, defines it.
That’s pretty fucking Ironic. You proving men are better than women while professing your hate for the site.
That was me referring to you. You’re obviously desperate and a screeching harpie.
That was damn good advice that if you had taken, would have saved you from making a sorry ass of yourself as you are doing right now.
Are you blind as well as stupid? It wasnt heresay, it was the editor of the website and writer of the documentary and writer of a shabily researched book on Einsteins first wife who promoted your deluded beliefs eating a huge slice of humble pie. A slice of that pie is obviously stuck halfway down your throat and you are now choking on it.
The drivel I was referring to was the “Desperate Harpie” and the “If you want to believe another feminist fairy tale, be my guest. But dont expect the rest of us to” comments, you moron! As for the rest of it, it’s just as much hearsay as the other beliefs! You’re the loser. Why don’t you do the world a favor and go dig a “hole” (not whole) for yourself, jump into it and hide permanently!
All you’ve got to argue against is me pressing the submit button twice? Are you deliberately trying to make yourself look like a loser because you are doing a fine job.
The ‘drivel’ as you put it was a statement by the editor of the website and documentary that supported your sorry beliefs on Einsteins wife. In it she concedes that the PBS ombudsman ordered the suspension of the sales of the film and closing down of the website as the known facts and evidence do not back the findings.
I see that the whole that you are digging for yourself is coming along nicely.
@The Asshole Geezer, you’re the desperate one. Easy on the submit button! I noticed you posted your drivel twice. Once was more than enough! This whole pathetic site reeks of desperation.
Since I never said that myself, I am assuming that what MV meant was that if you have anything to be ‘thankful’ for then that thanks is probably owed to men. Conversly, if you have anything that is undeserving of thanks then you need to thank women. Standard pregnancy card aside, I can see where he is coming from.
Really Clair, are you so devoid of any reasonable argument that you need to bring up other male members points to argue with and then try to get me to argue against it.
If a man deserves criticism from me, he’ll get it. If I am proved wrong by anyone, I hold my hand up and admit that I’ve been proved wrong.
Just because I do not dress my words with lace and candy that doesnt mean that I am angry. I like to get to the point and if you think that my abruptness comes across as anger then maybe you’re just not used to having an adult conversation. Maybe this will help:
Lols. :p
But MV said I have men to thank for everything to thank for? Doesn’t this mean that this is mens fault? Then why are you angry at women for it? Get angry at men.
Men didnt let women gain equality so that feminists could rule society, they did it to help women. Thankfully feminists arent ruling society. They are just ruining it and women are unknowingly helping them.
Nice to see that you find that funny.
Its funny, Feminists and feminism are apparently ruling society…that men created….so men let it happen. why are you angry? you only have your selves to blame…LMAO
@ The Desperate Harpie:
http://www.pbs.org/opb/einsteinswife/editor_note.htm
http://www.pbs.org/opb/einsteinswife/science/mquest.htm
If you want to believe another feminist fairy tale, be my guest. But dont expect the rest of us to.
PBS policy does not allow them to shut down the website but they have removed the outlandish claims that you believe. The experts are however still pushing for more changes as they feel she is still being given too much false credit.
@ The Desperate Harpie:
Editor’s Note
Letter From Web Site Editor Andrea Gabor
September 24, 2007
In March 2006, Einstein’s Wife, a 2003 documentary aired on PBS, and an accompanying Web site came under fire from a U.K. physicist who wrote a lengthy critique of the film and Web site.
After reviewing the criticisms, including some from physicists whose commentary was published not on the PBS Web site, but on such sites as physicsweb.org, the PBS ombudsman responded, in part: “… while the story of Mileva Maric is fascinating, tantalizing and deserving of being told, I felt that it also exaggerates her role and takes the viewer and reader too far beyond what is known … there is not enough sense of uncertainty in the film. Rather, it seems to set out deliberately to create the impression that she was a true partner in the full scientific sense … the known facts and evidence do not back it up.”
The ombudsman went on to recommend that PBS review the documentary and Web site and that, pending the review, it shut down the Web site and suspend sales of the film.
http://www.pbs.org/opb/einsteinswife/editor_note.htm
http://www.pbs.org/opb/einsteinswife/science/mquest.htm
If you want to believe another feminist fairy tale, be my guest. But dont expect the rest of us to.
PBS policy does not allow them to shut down the website but they have removed the outlandish claims that you believe. The experts are however still pushing for more changes as they feel she is still being given too much false credit.
What’s the matter? Can’t Greg answer for himself?
I read the article by Alberto A. Martinez. Everything he wrote could be speculation. There is no absolute proof either way. Nobody nowadays will ever know what happened between Einstein and his wife behind closed doors as far as her being his collaborator. Female scientists and physicists back then weren’t taken very seriously.
http://home.comcast.net/~xtxinc/mileva.htm
http://www.teslasociety.com/theoryofrel.htm
Well put Greg.
@ I Hate This Site: The only hold she had over him was probably sexual and thats it. Thats all.
Riiight - because “historians and scholars” are men, we feel the irrational need to protect male pride at all costs. Newsflash sister: unlike women, men don’t feel insecure because someone of the opposite sex did something successful. Men are more concerned with the truth. And the truth is that Einstein was a brilliant fucking genius who unified space and time.
Finally, you say, “Nobody here…has proof that she DIDN’T contritbute to his research.” Yeah, we do. It’s called the 1921 Nobel Prize for physics. Look into it.
Wait sorry, I was thinking refutable….I know I even wrote reputable. Thats entirely my bad. Sorry.
Yes I know it does. Being a research fellow at a University is no mean feat. Guaranteed more credibility than some feminazi woman that probably didn’t complete high school. To be a research fellow you have to at least do an honours degree or equivalent. I fail to see your point, if you are trying to discredit PhysicsWorld you are way out of your league.
*D3C*
I read it as well. Load of nonsense. But if it makes you happy then go ahead. Whats the harm in believing another urban myth?