Germain Greer is a Cunt (And a Whore) Part II
After writing my original article entitled Germaine Greer is a Cunt, I did some research on the dear lady doctor. After all, I did come at “Dr.” Greer like a venomous Ferrari (I’m sure I’m not the first — if you know what I sexually mean), and I didn’t want to sound half-cocked. I’m a man. If I’m going to sound anything it’s going to be all-cocked and I want to know about it first.
Not only did I discover that I was completely right in saying Germaine Greer is a cunt and also everything else I say about women not being as good as men, but I also found that Germaine Greer is even cuntier than I implied.
And she’s a whore.
Before I get into that, let me just say for the record that Germaine Greer has a nose like the cartoon version of Laurel from Laurel and Hardy. On a man it looks humourous, whimsical, and occasionally mischievous; on a woman, however — especially one as old and turkey chinned as “Dr.” Greer — it looks trashy and whorish, which she obviously is.
No woman has ever gotten to be a feminist without whoring the fuck out of herself for a good six or seven years prior. That’s why they turn into feminists. Five guys in one night, five guys at a time; your average feminist has fucked every combination she can count too and Greer is no exception. That’s why feminists (and specifically Greer) say they’re so comfortable in a world built by men for men. It’s because they’ve most likely fucked the sexual tension out of any situation.
Sounds like a pretty wild allegation doesn’t it? Well I have man proof. That’s the best kind of proof.
During her college years in like 65 BC, “Dr.” Greer joined a student acting troupe. I don’t know about you, but where I come from the only reason women join acting groups is because they want to sit on the casting couch. Whoring and attention whoring are pretty much the same thing anyway. I’ve man-proven elsewhere women can’t act anyway, so let’s just agree to agree and call that Exhibit A.
As Exhibit B, I present this anecdotal remark on a younger student Greer from one of her lady professors:
Germaine was explaining that there could be no liberation for women, no matter how highly educated, as long as we were required to cram our breasts into bras constructed like mini-Vesuviuses, two stitched white cantilevered cones which bore no resemblance to the female anatomy.
I’ve heard a lot of come-ons in my day. I’m a man after all and I wear a tie. That means women are coming on to me all the time. Try it for yourself. Fuck, wear a tie to the beach — just Speedos and a tie. You’ll need a lifeguard just to keep you from drowning in women. Actually, women are most likely coming on to you all the time anyway. As a man you just don’t notice because you’re too busy thinking of shit that matters, like getting a job or keeping a job by not fucking up. Women don’t have that option; thinking or not fucking up.
Do women look at your eyes or specifically avoid your gaze? Those are both classic female come-ons. Another classic female come-on is constantly ranting and raving about their breasts. Are they too big, are they too small? Do you not care for them, could they use a lift or a stuffing? Do you love them? Can they be aptly or cutely described by a volcano metaphor a fucking ten year old might concoct on a bad day?
There’s no better way for a woman to get attention from men than by talking about her tits. Just ask the America’s Women’s World Cup team — or Germaine Greer the student.
That’s strike one and strike two. In the whore game, that’s all you get. That’s a good thing too because Exhibit C is Greer’s own quote from a 1971 interview in the New York Times confessing that she was once a traveling unpaid sex toy for any and all bands; a period she calls her supergroupie phase. As a man, I am naturally more skilled than “Dr.” Greer at not inventing words where perfectly applicable ones already exist. That’s a waste of fucking time. In this case wanton, promiscuous slut seems appropriate.
Naturally, exhibits D through F are Greer’s advice to young women in Sex and Destiny to give up celibacy, monogamy, and finally to drink their own fucking menstrual blood — I assume that’s her homeopathic method of checking for STD’s.
And you thought the clitoris/penis thing was bad.
Germaine Greer is the real-life nightmare of every filthy, drugged up, and well abused whore who’s ever been typecast. She has no business speaking.
Related Articles:
September 8th, 2006 at 8:53 am - IP Man-Hash: af1047860b17b
roflmbo
What a sleazebag she is.
September 8th, 2006 at 6:23 pm - IP Man-Hash: 9b8f0aafee301
How depressing this website is - a bunch of bitter, abusive loners who reinforce each others’ unbalanced views on women by pretending it’s humorous.
Sad
September 8th, 2006 at 7:16 pm - IP Man-Hash: d8f419652ad49
Did you have a comment relevant to the topic as well, Liam?
-Dick
September 8th, 2006 at 11:06 pm - IP Man-Hash: c3106ac99958d
I think our friend Liam’s cerebral anoxia is getting to him.
September 9th, 2006 at 4:05 am - IP Man-Hash: cb6e01c4e5660
Dear Liam. Go unfuck yourself.
September 9th, 2006 at 5:20 am - IP Man-Hash: 14e5ada41b82e
Dear Liam, go a drink you own menstrual blood. You twat. I don’t give a turd about your opinions. There is no point in you posting anything else to this site as we already know what your going to say, becasue you are a feminist. If you had anything to say regarding the subject of this forum you would have mentioned something related to Dr. Greer. Instead you post a comment that has been seen 100 times before. How boring and unimaginative. Your comment regarding this site’s users could as easily be addressed to members of the feminist movement.
September 9th, 2006 at 7:50 am - IP Man-Hash: e1c4131d44871
According to Wikipedia, she said taste your own menstural blood, not drink it.
September 9th, 2006 at 9:40 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
There’s this cult floating round here, it’s called the Movement for Integration Spiritual into Absolute. MISA for short. Some new age mumbo jumbo crap. They go around making ‘human spirals’, saturnalian orgies and drinking each other’s piss.
Do you suppose there’s some common nutter trait in hovering amid the gene pool that compels to potty suck?
September 9th, 2006 at 9:41 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Urinal therapy, they call it. The mind boggles.
September 9th, 2006 at 9:51 am - IP Man-Hash: e1c4131d44871
http://www.life.com/Life/cover_search/view?coverkeyword=Feminist&start Month=1&startYear=1936&endMonth=12&endYear=2006&pageNumber=1&indexNumb er=0
September 9th, 2006 at 1:31 pm - IP Man-Hash: d3c1cd14f06ea
Nasty :S
September 9th, 2006 at 5:41 pm - IP Man-Hash: 31e3a7c29eec9
For fuck sake if your gonna try and re-claim the importance of being male at least do it in an clever way. Having a ridiculous list of insults for women does not make you anymore of a man, it just makes you look like you have completely given up on rational thought which I thought men were particularaly good at….obviously not….you all dissapoint me. What tiny cocks you must have. Go ahead continue to insult anymale that disagrees with your insanely stupid POV. Call them gay, feminists, whatever… I don’t give a fuck. I just went on google tonight to see if there is anything to be proud about being male… You guys insult everything that could be respectable about being a man. Get some fucking pubes… you all sound like LITTLE schoolboys.
September 9th, 2006 at 8:20 pm - IP Man-Hash: e66326523d778
“I just went on google tonight to see if there is anything to be proud about being male.”
You didn’t know there was anything already? Fuck off the site then.
BTW, why do we have to be “clever”? That’s for manipulative females and their boy toys.
September 9th, 2006 at 8:36 pm - IP Man-Hash: dd301ffa39400
I think I put this somewhere else, and I don’t mean to spam your website–but I’m sure you don’t get laid.
Like not at all.
September 9th, 2006 at 10:31 pm - IP Man-Hash: 280531d7742f3
Ms Geer fell out of the fugly tree and hit every branch on the way down.
No wonder she hates men, she couldn’t get any to buy her goods.
September 10th, 2006 at 7:04 am - IP Man-Hash: c489ffd6fd8e0
I think Steve Irwin was a nightmare on screen.. the programs werent about animals…but about him self… he was a bad, bad entertenant too.
And we all have the right to say what we think
September 10th, 2006 at 7:23 am - IP Man-Hash: d8f419652ad49
Including me.
-Dick
September 10th, 2006 at 7:27 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
One could reasonably argue some excel at the saying patr. Not so good at the other.
September 10th, 2006 at 8:41 am - IP Man-Hash: da3164911f9b3
Wow you think this way really? Visit this link below.
September 10th, 2006 at 8:42 am - IP Man-Hash: da3164911f9b3
Wow you think this way really? Visit this link below.
Link
September 10th, 2006 at 8:46 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Jolly good show, old chap. I confess I blissfully clicked away, didn’t think of seeing where it goes first.
September 10th, 2006 at 11:17 am - IP Man-Hash: 7478d77d6ad35
feminist boys piss off!
you give us girls who know their place in a man’s world a bad name.
September 10th, 2006 at 5:26 pm - IP Man-Hash: 64658567f5dab
what a fantastic website you boys have put together here. It’s nice to see there is a source of intelligent information where girls can learn their place.
September 10th, 2006 at 5:42 pm - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Actually, this isn’t a site for ‘girls to learn their place’. Perhaps you missed the home page where it said “NO WOMEN ALLOWED”.
Glad you found the site informative though, and equally glad we can always take what a woman says as being true, honest, accurate, and never sarcastic.
-wolfe
September 10th, 2006 at 5:46 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4da1754577035
This topic might be a bit stale, but I still wanted to say I think this is one of the funniest sites I’ve ever visited. Good show, keep it up. We certainly need to encourage chauvanism in a society of increasing equality. Oh how I dream of living in the time when women knew their place in life.
Germaine greer needs to think long and hard about what she said. Those words coming from an ex-whore don’t sound very credible, and even less so when you look at how truly gut-wrenchingly ugly she is. She is in all certainty the ugliest face to be blessed with life, and I don’t believe she can afford to slag off on an aussie hero like Steve when she’s got no redeeming qualities herself. None. I’d like to smack her around the face with one of Steve’s echidnas, but it would probably improve her image and I don’t think I’d like to play a part in that.
September 10th, 2006 at 6:04 pm - IP Man-Hash: 0264a8e77b5ac
Dear Bobby
LOL, you gay femminist. Great reply. Not only did you obviosuly find offense in the way in which the article was written, quote “a ridiculous list of insults” but then replied with a ridiculous list of insults:
“do it in a clever way”
“small cocks”
“get some fucking pubes”
“little schoolboys”
Oh and then to say “you dont fucking care” - you care enough to post a hilarious comment on a quality website. Perhaps you should start using the left side of your brain more frequently.
September 10th, 2006 at 6:10 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
But a lone grrr minion. Soon passeth.
September 10th, 2006 at 6:19 pm - IP Man-Hash: 64658567f5dab
September 10th, 2006 at 6:21 pm - IP Man-Hash: 64658567f5dab
Hey ‘Bobby’, shut your pie-hole you bitch’s bitch, and grow some balls. You’re a soft, homosexual, feminist, poor excuse for a member of the superior gender.
As God is my witness, and with the power vested in me by the Male population at large, I hereby declare you a woman. Congratulations, I’m sure you’ll now feel much more comfortable with yourself. You are now no longer a man, and not welcome here. Now fuck off you slut, and start selling your ass because that’s all you’re good for.
September 10th, 2006 at 7:19 pm - IP Man-Hash: d8f419652ad49
aussiebloke, I appreciate your comments.
-Dick
September 10th, 2006 at 7:27 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5475964f1d333
Jesus, you men become more sickening every second.
September 10th, 2006 at 7:48 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
And how are you doing, doctor Phil? I thought you finally (for the 20th time) decided to abandon this hell hole of ‘androcentrism’.
That’s only cause we’ve got plenty of women look down to.
September 11th, 2006 at 1:11 am - IP Man-Hash: 6422d96cec838
steve was the fucking man, i known he was going to die one day, anyone that went around fucking wild animal is for sure going to get it the end;) i’m sure he was taken the bards up the arse and it went too deep and got him in the heart.
September 11th, 2006 at 1:33 am - IP Man-Hash: 8df4b9656c70a
I’m well, thank you Sonyad. And how are you?
True, I am counting down the seconds, can’t wait.
Have you ever heard the expression ‘attention carries energy’ Sonyad? Keep viewing women negatively and not only will women pick up on that, but you may also find that you are then only able to attract that which you concentrate on. That which you wish to avoid.
P.S. I’ve only ever seen one episode of Dr Phil. Have I mentioned this before? Probably, anyway, he was basically blasting these obese American mother’s for being verbally abusive towards their teenage daughters. They were abusing their daughters because their daughters were fat. Americans are clearly mad. Jerry Springer, Tom Cruise etc have shown us this is the truth. In light of this, Dr Phil appears quite sane.
September 11th, 2006 at 3:23 am - IP Man-Hash: 349e9107ea259
Only a woman could find that funny.
September 11th, 2006 at 1:13 pm - IP Man-Hash: c8da780d6eefc
You went on Google to see what there was proud at about being male rather than looking at yourself and the men around you? No wonder so much of the world has problems.
September 11th, 2006 at 1:55 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Female, ever the delightful interloper (Keep viewing women negatively and not only will women pick up on that, but you may also find that you are then only able to attract that which you concentrate on. That which you wish to avoid. Complete and utter nonsense. English translation please, I don’t read Stupid.
September 11th, 2006 at 1:59 pm - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Poetic justice. Forgot to quote. The curses must’ve caught up with me.
September 11th, 2006 at 6:29 pm - IP Man-Hash: 205ed29d0af24
Greer is a pathetic fukin paedophile in the mould of a female garry glitter and u only have to see her arrogant smirking witch face on utube as she sqats n pisses on poor lovely bloke steves grave ( Who I fukin worshipped )I hope that fishy flapped fuker gets paralized from the neck down. plz forgive me but im really mad.
September 13th, 2006 at 12:59 am - IP Man-Hash: 83b3341c262d0
i going out right now to fuck and then kill a sting ray, whos with me!!
September 13th, 2006 at 7:02 am - IP Man-Hash: 4555637db20cf
I’m kinda busy, so you’ll just have to go without me. And, hey, go fuck yourself while you’re at it.
September 13th, 2006 at 9:51 am - IP Man-Hash: 8df4b9656c70a
GREAT article! GREAT site! I love it so much I just spent $45 of my Aussie dollar in your online store for a couple of items. Keep up the good work Dick! Steve Irwin was a true blue Aussie and was loved by everyone, he deserves better than some bitch mouthing off about him.
Cheers,
Eddy - Syd, Aus.
September 13th, 2006 at 11:10 am - IP Man-Hash: 6897e3ddf8ad0
Eddy, why are you coming from the same IP as Female?
-Dick
September 13th, 2006 at 11:43 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Because he ain’t getting any since he started to visit the site?
September 13th, 2006 at 11:44 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Circular logic, at it best and brightest.
September 13th, 2006 at 4:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: 8df4b9656c70a
Jerry Springer, proof positive of US Lunacy and now forever-after to be known as the man who coined the phrase, “my hair hurts”.
He is also 62 and wants his stage show to run for another 73 years. K. Then he’s going to run for the Oval Office. Ahh, those yanks.
http://www.kingcountyjournal.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060912/L IFE/609120306
September 13th, 2006 at 8:00 pm - IP Man-Hash: 5f25557f12b69
What is Jerry Springer guilty of? Providing an entertainment product that millions of Americans enjoyed and paid for? That’s called the free market system Female, you stupid cunt.
-Dick
September 14th, 2006 at 2:04 am - IP Man-Hash: 8df4b9656c70a
Jerry is guilty of lowering the general tone of social decency (Is he your role model? through encouraging, coercing and provoking people to go a round of fisticuffs on national television. I can clearly remember the first time I saw a physical fight break out on a talk show. I believe this was in 1997 on Sally Jesse or Jerry Springer. I think it was between lesbians. I cant remember what it was about. Anyway, I was shocked, the audience was shocked, Sally or Jerry (they both look similiar, so I forget which one) was shocked. Straight after that show, nearly every single talk show then just had to have a biff on it. Jerry is the main protagonist in this area.
So, my point, if he becomes President, who will he encourage to fight next? Syria versus Jordan? Syria, Iran versus Israel? The possibilities are endless and not good.
September 14th, 2006 at 2:20 am - IP Man-Hash: 4d87b4597f9f4
Are you guys aware thaty this cunt published a book, “The Boy”,which shows pics of semi-nude boys as young as 15? No oone said shit. Can you imgine the outburst of hatred which would be bestowed upon a man who published aa book called “the Girl”, showing semi-nude 15 year-old girls?! Damn, women get away with everything in this World, because, you know, they’re the oppressed “weaker sex” - despite the fact that they out-live men by several years, since the “oppressive” Patriarchy spares them from doing the most demanding jobs.
September 14th, 2006 at 2:30 am - IP Man-Hash: 8df4b9656c70a
Yes, we already know about this. Are you aware that many female models in magazines and on catwalks are as young as 14? Greer clearly published that book as a reaction to similar exploitation of women. You are outraged at it, which is all well and good, but are you also outraged about the exploitation of women in the sex trade, the fashion industry etc? Or because you like the look of what you see, it doesn’t really matter to you how young the girls are? Regardless of the boys in Greer’s book, most women are not going to find them sexually desirable, which is perhaps why there was no public outrage AFAIK over it.
September 14th, 2006 at 4:29 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
Women also get away with making believe they drive. With the engine running.
September 14th, 2006 at 4:31 am - IP Man-Hash: eadd56da2c7c9
As opposed to Fem, proof positive of Australian mental health.
Give my regards to the dolphins, Fem. If and when the planets are aligned correctly, of course.
And the next time you read about a 62 year old man who wants to keep doing something for 73 years, go to Google and type “define:irony”.
If I could be bothered searching for Dick’s article on women not having a sense of humour, I’d link to it.
-Big Al
September 14th, 2006 at 4:48 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
I’m not a big fan of Springer. His politics are pretty much the antithesis of mine: he’s all touchy-feely; I’m much more skeptical about the fundamental good nature of humans. I think his show is grotesque, tasteless, and tacky, but I defend utterly his right to go ahead and broadcast it if anyone’s stupid enough to watch it and advertise on it. More power to him.
But yeah. What Al said about irony.
-wolfe
September 14th, 2006 at 5:08 am - IP Man-Hash: 8df4b9656c70a
You think his show is grotesque and you wouldnt watch it but you admire him because he makes money from showing it and therefore you think it is a great thing. Irony alright.
September 14th, 2006 at 7:49 am - IP Man-Hash: 5f25557f12b69
So the correct method of dealing with problems is to commit the same offense as revenge? That’s why women, and specifically you female, make such shitty parents.
-Dick
September 14th, 2006 at 8:20 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
Female, that’s idiotic. No, I don’t admire him and never said I did. This is why your posts are sometimes so annoying, and it becomes impossible to defend you — or them.
I said I defend utterly his right to go ahead and broadcast. Didn’t say I admired him, for I don’t. And earning money is no sine qua non for admiration. At times the reverse.
Here’s a gentleman who had much the same feelings as I do on the matter of Springer. His name was François-Marie Arouet. You’ll no doubt need google to figure out his pseudonym, since you’re no doubt the beneficiary of a “comprehensive” Australian education. I agree with the man on free speech, if relatively little else.
-wolfe
September 14th, 2006 at 8:25 am - IP Man-Hash: 356b2e2244d02
Why don’t you respond to what was actually said instead of making shit up just to be a cantankerous bitch.
Where exactly did Wolfe say he found the Springer show admirable?
September 14th, 2006 at 8:27 am - IP Man-Hash: 356b2e2244d02
Damn Wolfe, you beat me to it.
September 14th, 2006 at 8:36 am - IP Man-Hash: 980cc8a8ac1a7
He tends to do that. Beam down suddenly, tase Female once or twice, then beam up just as quick. No forewarning of the flames.
September 14th, 2006 at 9:06 am - IP Man-Hash: 76cebfba7c181
@Mike Thanks Mike. Appreciate your comments.
@Sony Ha! Romulan cloaking device.
-wolfe
September 14th, 2006 at 1:17 pm - IP Man-Hash: 8df4b9656c70a
translation device:
“more power to him” aka, make money however you can. Money is your goal and if you have the power to make wads of it, then you must be good.
= admiration.
I know you will have a difficult time accepting what you have just read. Please note I did not type money is your god. I typed goal.
September 14th, 2006 at 1:39 pm - IP Man-Hash: 8df4b9656c70a
So the correct method of dealing with problems is to commit the same offense as revenge? That’s why women, and specifically you female, make such shitty parents.
-Dick
There is no need to get emotional Dick. I’m being purely logical here, I’m not surprised you can’t handle it.
I haven’t made mention of whether I agree or disagree with Greer’s actions, so I guess you’d better hold onto your shorts while you run away with your assumptions.
Greer was a marketing genius. Obviously no more. However, you’d have to be blind to disagree with the level of exposure she has. She clearly likes shock tactics to draw attention to issues.
Of course you don’t like the fact she has published a book which apparently sexualise young males, but hold on a minute, I already thought most males would be sexual by age fifteen anyway, or they would, if they could.
What she has effectively done is publish a book of males looking innocent, looking more like young girls. The only reason it also looks sexualised is because they’re also half naked. Perhaps her point is that regardless of gender, young people are vulnerable and sexploitation of them is wrong.
Lucasz didn’t answer my questions about what he thinks of young girls in magazines/catwalks and neither did you. I’ll give you both the benefit of the doubt that silence doesn’t speak volumes in this instance as you probably both don’t read all my posts.
The power of Greer’s book is in the outrage you are able to feel about it and the challenge that then presents to your acceptance of sexploitation of adolescent girls…if you honestly don’t wish to be a hypocrite.
September 14th, 2006 at 2:49 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4d87b4597f9f4
The stupidest, most illogical rebuttal ever. First of all, there is an enormous difference between showing a 15 year-old boy who’s almost completely naked - except for a boxer brief - and who’s showing the upper part of his pubic hair line, to a similarly aged girl who’s doing a fashion show fully clothed. It’s like comparing apples to oranges. Secondly, straight men don’t care about fashion and don’t watch fashion shows, so your point is mute. In reality, it is women who purchase fashion magazines and, thus, supports the exploitation of girls.
Thirdly and finally, there is no logical connection between women not finding teen boys sexually attractive, and there not being any public outrage against the book. Women may or may not buy this book en masse. Completely irrelevant. There is no logical connection between the demographics of those who purchase this book and the lack of public outburst, as much as there is between the perceived motifs of the book’s author, and how such motifs are deemed to be acceptable exclusively due to her gender. Most men might find underage girls to be sexually attractive, but this is immaterial to the discussion, because no man would even dare to publish a book showing semi-naked 15 year-old girls, and very few men would have the galls to purchase such book. Again, your point is nil. No: there was no public outrage over the book because the author is female, and the gender being exploited, male. It’s like the double-standard when a grown man has sex with an underge girl, and is immediately deemed to be a paedophile, but when a woman does the same to an underage boy, the charge is dismissed because “he obviously wanted it”. Even if it’s true, the fact is that grown women can get away with acting towards minors of the opposite gender in ways that no man would get away when it comes to girls. Like Greer, you’re a hypocrite and learly biased toward the commonly acepted post-modern feminist prejudice that women can do no wrong, and that men are responsible for all the evil in the World. Fuck you and your gender.
P Coderch
September 14th, 2006 at 2:57 pm - IP Man-Hash: 8df4b9656c70a
It’s not comparing apples to oranges when these days any magazine or catwalk show is more than likely going to involve clothes through which you can see tit and ass.
September 14th, 2006 at 3:01 pm - IP Man-Hash: 6897e3ddf8ad0
Well said, P Coderch. Unfortunately, Female is as dumb as a brick.
-Dick
September 14th, 2006 at 3:20 pm - IP Man-Hash: 4d87b4597f9f4
Thanks. One other thing: I forgot to criticize the use of the word “exploitation”, which feminist whores, such as the aforementioned one who replied to my missive, like to use so much. “Exploited” is such a strong word! Women who pose for “Playboy”, “Penthouse” and do other such pornographic material for men, are all over the age of consent, which is not the case for two thirds of the boys featured in Greer’s book. Secondly, they get paid tons of money to do it; many are actually quite pleased to be “exploited”! Thirdly, none of these women were, in any way, forced to strip naked and have their pictures taken: they signed a contract and gave permission for the “exploitation” to take place. And finally, who the feminists think they are for saying what a woman should or not do with her body?! The body belongs to the person, so the woman who decides to showcase her body to the World has the right to do so! By saying otherwise, you’d be arguing that a government or, worse, a feminist cadre has more right over the woman’s body than herself. I know most women are stupid and need to be protected from their own decisions, but stopping an adult woman from removing her clothes and having her pictures taken because she doesen’t realize that men will masturbate to her pictures is utterly pahteti